Liverpool Banter Archive May 17 2017

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

17 May 2017 22:47:05
Well done Danny ward. Would be great for them to come up an he stay with them for another year!

Believable17 Unbelievable0

18 May 2017 07:35:57
Well done indeed. Looks to be the only on loan LFC player with a genuine future at the club.


18 May 2017 09:07:53
Im not so sure about that, klopp would not have bought karius if that was the case.


18 May 2017 10:49:25
Even if Migs performed like Lev Yashin, Gordon Banks and Bouffan all rolled into one, there would still be people on here who would put Calamity Karius straight back in.


18 May 2017 14:19:29
Kloppometer. . have a word with yourself.
I'm chuffed at Mignolet's improvement, great credit to him and the coaching team. Migs and Karius are both our players. Let's get behind them both. Migs has had many opportunities to come good, now you're writing off someone who was the most promising young goalkeeper in the Budesliega after a handful of games. Look at the Monster that de Gea has become for that mob down the East Lancs.


18 May 2017 18:37:13
I'll be watching the play off final to see how Ward does and hopefully, Huddersfield can come up to the PL.


18 May 2017 22:16:14
Andy,

I've nothing against Karius and hope he does eventually prove himself as number 1. My argument has always been that some posters assume that Karius will automatically be number 1 at the start of next season, when he has shown nothing yet to justify it. He's had his chances and hasn't taken them yet.

Incidentally, just because De Gea started his EPL career very shakily and then came good doesn't mean that everyone will do the same.


18 May 2017 23:57:34
Fair points Kloppometor.


17 May 2017 21:37:33
Hi Eds, have Liverpool or any other Premier league team shown an interest in Huddersfield midfielder Philip Billings. He has looked a real prospect whenever I've seen him play. Cheers.

Believable0 Unbelievable2

18 May 2017 02:45:22
In pole position.

Wagner and klopp! Yano blud bruvs.


17 May 2017 21:39:30
Love the new away shirt throw back to the old green and white squared kit personally think its lovely. Not sure about the orangey 3rd kit but they only get used about 2 times anyway.

Believable6 Unbelievable5

17 May 2017 22:31:36
It's not been released yet has it? I just searched and I saw those kits as leaked not official.


17 May 2017 23:35:57
I loved that 1995 away kit, my mum was always reluctant to buy me Liverpool kits (she's a rugby woman! ) and was always appalled at how much they cost. But she bought me that one at the end of the season as she found it cheap on a market stall. May have to invest in the new one (if the leaked images are true) and be 11 again!


18 May 2017 19:56:22
Seems there is a lot of weight behind them for it not to be them to be honest at this late point.


17 May 2017 19:04:06
Hi ed001

Looking at the stats, Sturridge has been available for 26 out of 37 games this season. That's a fitness rate of 70%. 6 starts, 13 subs, 7 unused as a sub.

We talk about this need to sell Sturridge because he's injury prone, yet his fitness this season actually hasn't been that bad. 70% is a great improvement for him. His lack of appearances is a lot more due to Klopp preferring Firmino than injury troubles.

Don't you think that if had Klopp trusted him more, we perhaps would have had UCL wrapped up by now? Apart from Mane, Sturridge with his great movement is by far the most useful asset to have in unlocking those deep-defending smaller teams we struggle against. If he started against Saints he well could have scored a goal, and if he started against Watford, the victory could have been more comfortable.

Yes, Firmino provides movement, but not the kind of movement suited against deep defences. He doesn't run in behind, he runs the opposite way. Without Mane, it's hard to score against these teams without a metaphorical needle in our team constantly trying to pierce holes open like Sturridge does.

I've never really bought into the argument that he doesn't suit Klopp. I think he suits Klopp well enough. People go on about how he doesn't press enough, but seriously, how much pressing does Liverpool actually do when the opposition is parking the bus? None, because you can't press when you always have the ball!

Believable9 Unbelievable3

{Ed001's Note - hard to tell, we might have conceded more with him in the side or anything. All ifs, buts and maybes. I would prefer him in the side when fit though.}

17 May 2017 20:27:16
Do you think he will leave ed?


{Ed001's Note - I don't think he will go, unless a last minute move, as no one will pay the money we would want.}

17 May 2017 20:40:20
Ye but how many of those sub appearances are when studge was 100% fit? I'd hazard most of those times he was just coming back from injury and clearly he is not 100% there physically or mentally. Its difficult to plan effectively with a player who has been injured like that.


17 May 2017 20:53:59
Earlier in the season the line on sturridge was: we create less chances when sturridge is in the team because of his lack of movement/ effort and although we score a higher % of those chances it's better to have him out and create more.

That was the line earlier this season when he played and we couldn't break teams down. I'm surprised he's now become the saviour against teams we can't break down.


17 May 2017 21:43:42
West Ham for Studge, London boy go back home and they will give him a decent wage and like a sicknote striker.


17 May 2017 21:44:20
but the best defence is a good offence. you invite trouble when the opponent aren't scared of our attack.


17 May 2017 22:01:22
If he played more games the percentage he was available would likely have dropped due to injuries incurred in matches.


17 May 2017 22:32:43
Somehow Studge even manages to get slated for being from London?


17 May 2017 22:48:35
It was nothing to do with sturrixge.

It was the change in systsm. Firminos movement was non existent when we played 433 with him.

No coincidence that like 13/ 14 sturrixge found himself in a diamond formation.


17 May 2017 22:49:17
If he doesn't move on ed that will mean we won't sign another striker? Luan for example. Ed002 has explained we continue to look at Strikers but if Studge stays I can't see how we can bring another one in?


17 May 2017 22:51:40
i think your just looking at stats but i think if you look at occasions when we hadnt the preferred guys there sturridge was missing also at times so he actually missed chances to play, like winter/ January when mane in africa coutinho just about come or just back he goes away for hot weather break and comes back with an illness another missed opportunity if you get my gist.


17 May 2017 23:23:17
He's from Birmingham, Mr Bobby J.


17 May 2017 23:56:50
Sturridge is from Birmingham I think, not London!


18 May 2017 00:59:55
Sturridge is from Birmingham.

And judging him on the game at the weekend is a bit hasty in my opinion as West Ham never turned up as they had nothing to play for.
I felt sorry for Slaven Billic who seems a xecent bloke but who has a chairman in Sullivan who thinks he knows more about buying players than hever does.

Sturridge need to play 10 games on the trot to be fully assessed.

There's no doubting his ability but there is a huge question mark over his stamina.

Hopefully with no world cup or euros this year he can have a proper preseason and build it up slowly FOR LFC IN THE CHAMPIONS LEAGUE.


18 May 2017 03:48:58
Sturridge suits 2 upfront or when we're facing teams that sit back and defend and we need his skills to put away the half chances. What he's not so good at IMO is the high press against top opposition as Firmino is such an important trigger for us, but we seem to be playing that a little less often now as Klopp seems to have adapted his style more to a slightly more balanced approach.

If sturridge can stay fit I think the way we're playing now suits him better than our style 12 months ago, particularly if it's Coutinho in midfield who is more capable of playing in his runs in behind.


18 May 2017 06:26:57
Ed I'm not sure if Sturridge could cause Liverpool to concede more goals, not at least when the team needs to break teams down. We always have around 70% possession and the opportunities the opponents get are fast counter attacks that Sturridge very often could not do anything to stop.

In other games when the opposition comes out to play - particularly the better sides - I agree that playing Firmino up top is the best solution, and results validate that. His pressing up top helps unsettle the opposition with a two-fold effect, it helps us score and helps us defend.

But when it comes to playing the double-deckers, I reckon a front two of Sturridge and Firmino would be ideal, with Coutinho pulling the strings in midfield.


{Ed001's Note - he could, very easily, by not covering a passing lane or playing a pass which is intercepted etc. There is no way of telling exactly what would have happened. It is pointless to talk about where we would have been as you can't tell.}

18 May 2017 20:00:41
I was referring to the lifestyle he seems to purvey not the place of birth and the fact he's lived in london before. Plus still don't see he doing anything but leave. We cannot afford anymore time or money being wasted on a player who spends all his time in the sick bay.


17 May 2017 18:56:55
Eds I know this is very very unlikely but say we get the results needed for a play off and city also had the same points and goals scored/ conceded, what happens then? Three way play off, best two head to head records play off?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - no idea, as far as I can see there is no format set out for this. I would assume it would be a one off match though.}

17 May 2017 20:26:55
It can't happen can it? I don't think it's mathematically possible for us all to have the same record now.


17 May 2017 21:19:30
Arsenal and Liverpool can and Arsenal and Manchester City can, but it can't be a three way.


17 May 2017 17:08:56
I was going to ask the Eds about Timo Werner, but I advised myself to use the search button first! Wow, the boys and girls unenthusiastic forum have been talking about Timo Werner since November 2013, and he's still only 21! Ridiculous!

Believable6 Unbelievable0

17 May 2017 16:21:14
Dirk Kuyt - thanks for the memories. Good luck in your retirement.

Believable20 Unbelievable1

17 May 2017 16:50:32
Top bloke.


17 May 2017 16:56:44
Kennys got his dirk kuyt la la la la.


17 May 2017 21:16:35
I wish him well on whatever he decides to do next. I actually got to talk to him in the Albert before the Chelesa game in January, what a humble guy.


17 May 2017 22:29:54
Great man.


17 May 2017 22:51:51
Could do with him in this team.


18 May 2017 01:07:34
He had some engine. A powerhouse.

If you could combine him and Sturridge then we would have some player .


18 May 2017 12:35:25
Anyone remember the DK song;

Dirk Kuyt however good he may be, he hit every branch of the ugly tree. Like Fowler, Crouch and Craig Bellamy, Dirk Kuyts boss but he's f**king ugly!

Great bloke and some great memories none more so than an hat-trick against United.


18 May 2017 18:31:57
Love the guy. A true warrior with the heart of a lion on it and as gentle as a lamb off it. The guy never shied away from a fight and showed bravery and courage when others bottled it. A true gentleman and a role model to young kids in the game awash with pampered millionaires lacking the bottle for a fight. He will always be a Reds Legend to me.


17 May 2017 15:53:02
Hi Eds,

Its been long since I posted.
Quick one, just wanted to know what's the current situation with Lacazzete? Is Liverpool interested in the striker?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Try the Search engine.}

17 May 2017 14:53:27
One for Ed002 please. Can you explain how third party ownership works if you have time? Thanks in advance.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - It means that a third party or third parties (typically agents or other representatives, investors, sometimes other clubs) own a proportion of the players economic rights. It comes about either (a) when a club wants to buy a player but don't have the money do so - then a third party will buy, for example 50%, of the players economic rights by helping to fund the transfer, or (b) when a club has a player that they think they will profit more from in the future, so they can raise funds by selling part of the player's economic rights to a third party. When these players are subsequently sold, then any buying club meeds to negotiate with the selling club and any third parties who own an interest in the player. This is where it can become complicated. If a club owned 80% a player and agreed to sell for £8M, the buyer then needs to agree with the third parties to buy the remaining 20% - and that could be at any fee the sellers want.}

17 May 2017 15:50:49
Brutal.


17 May 2017 16:31:07
Thanks Ed. that's a great overview I can see how complications can arise!


17 May 2017 16:37:35
Ed002 can the club who own say the 80% buy out the third party at any time even outside the transfer window?


{Ed002's Note - Yes but typically they don't have the money.}

17 May 2017 16:49:55
Ed in a circumstance say with Luan who I think has third party ownership involved at what point can the player be contacted and personal terms discussed for example if the fee was agreed with the club and not with third party would the club be able to contact the player? Im assuming vice versa would be redundant as Id guess agreeing fee with third party would not happen prior to the club.

Secondly is there a maximum % a third party can own? Is it possible for a players majority stake to be owned by third parties?

I can also see why it would be a major problem for dealing clubs as third parties would clearly only be interested in return so would look to extort as much as possible.


{Ed002's Note - The player can be contacted when the club that holds his registration gives permission. There is no maximum and other vehicles are used for players owned outright, such as Deportivo Maldonado.}

17 May 2017 20:35:40
All very interesting ed.
Say if a player is looking to run his contract down and move on a free over some dispute he had with the club will the third party be in titled to any compansation.


17 May 2017 12:24:04
If any of the underwhelming transfer targets we've been linked with are true, I'd rather keep Sturridge.

Believable10 Unbelievable6

17 May 2017 15:27:51
What do you expect, mate? Dybala, Greizmann etc are a bit out of reach for now.

I'm quite excited by some of the targets discussed. And I hope we keep Sturridge, regardless.


17 May 2017 15:52:04
I'm excited for Ings coming back! Poor guy hasn't even had the chance to start his career here really : (.


17 May 2017 16:18:06
Why keep Sturridge? He plays a 1/ 4 of games each season and we are just losing money on him sitting on a treatment bench.

We could bring someone in who is hopefully not as injury prone.


17 May 2017 16:49:43
I sort of see your point adamski, but can we actually bring in anyone as good? If not, keeping him is a reasonable gamble.
Also really hoping Ings comes good, he should be an ideal player for Klopp's style if he can regain fitness.


17 May 2017 16:51:56
We've been linked with Gareth Bale.


17 May 2017 18:46:11
I'd rather keep Sturridge to begin with.


17 May 2017 18:56:33
I tend to agree that our rumoured targets are very underwhelming, Keane, Maguire, Pickford, Oxlade Chamberlain, none of them are good enough to take us to the next level or are an improvement on those already at the club. TQ if you're genuinely excited by that list then you need professional help!


17 May 2017 19:10:45
I said some, not all. Brandt and Sessegnon excite me. Robertson does not, for example.

Either way, you're probably right about needing professional help ;)


17 May 2017 23:46:16
Ronald, stop teasing us about Lord Gareth, you bad man! id give my right arm to sign Bale, and considering I'm a supporter of the Wales national team I'll be devastated if he ends up with the Mancs. I think we would be the last team he would join unfortunately if he came back to the EPL.


18 May 2017 18:32:29
I do not see where the Ed's (the only ones I listen to regarding interest in transfers) have said we are interested in the slowest CB in the PL Maguire (who wouldn't even make the stands in our team), Keane (who is off to Utd), Oickford (who won't be here), the Ox (less said, the better) and Robertson (still under consideration but definitely not first/ second nor third choice per Ed01). I would wait until the summer before passing any judgement on the targets as bar Brandt, Perreira, and Sessegnon, no one really knows who we are after.


17 May 2017 12:09:58
I've seen in a few papers and online that were linked to Jordan pickford.
Do people really think he's better than karius? I really think karius will be a top keeper for us. His bad start for us I'm putting down to him think8ng our defence was better than it was.

Believable7 Unbelievable9

17 May 2017 13:11:38
Karius will be much better next season. The criticism belted at him at from all corners will make him a better player who can handle pressure. His distribution is pretty decent, just needs to be more dominating from set pieces and he will be fine.


17 May 2017 13:50:50
Problem is, does he play next season? He will probably be used in the European games and cup games if you ask me.

Mignolet has done nothing to deserve getting dropped. His improvement this year has been astonishing. After 5 games I thought it was just luck. After 10 games I thought it was a purple patch. Now though 25 games on without a glaring mistake and after a string of man of the match performances, I have to give him credit where it is due. He is (looks around and whispers) a good goal keeper.


17 May 2017 14:32:40
yep, MK, Migs has made a massive improvement, apart from that glaring mistake V Chelsea, were I may add, he saved a penalty, he should be first choice, Karius should be making progress too, and will get some game time .


17 May 2017 14:44:46
Know one can really make a judgement on Karius (apart from Klopp of course) He could be great he could be ok or he could equally be poor. Migs has improved but there will always be the potential for him to lose the plot in a game (s) . If we seriously want to compete for the league then we need a top top goalie, can't mess about. A solid defence starts with a solid goalie, Migs ain't the answer, Karius is currently a no.2.


17 May 2017 15:12:42
Mignolet's improvement has been quite incredible. It makes me wonder whether it's down to good coaching or to the fact that his position as number one is properly being challenged for the first time.

What do people thank? I'm inclined to go with the latter but I could easily be wrong. Maybe it's a combination of the two.

Whatever it is, I'm just glad it's working.


17 May 2017 15:19:06
I'm not sure I consider that Luiz free kick as a glaring error personally. You can argue he was caught out by quick thinking but sometimes you just have to hold your hands up and say it was clever from the opposition. He was caught out whilst trying to organise his defence as well which is something he has been criticised for not doing in the past.

It certainly wasn't as embarrassing as his mistakes of previous seasons anyway!


17 May 2017 16:19:47
Karius was not ready for the premiership,

It was obvious in the previous season matches in America. He really struggled on any kind of cross from the wings.

Klopp was right to take him out of the firing line.

But it wasn't wise using him in cup games in a vastly inexperienced side with by far too many changes from the first team.

The lad who looked confident on signing looked shattered by the cup exits.

Hopefully he'll kick on this season and he must be doing something right as he seems to have shook Migs out of his stupor when he thought he was guaranteed to start.

We need to improve what's in front of them before they are properly judged.


{Ed002's Note - So was Klopp also right to (a) buy him, (b) tell him he was first choice, and (c) tell the world he would be Liverpool's first choice? Or did Klopp get it all horribly wrong?}

17 May 2017 16:54:51
i think the difference has to be accredited to the mentioned change in coahing and having the keepers knocked about while dealing with balls. Mignolet has clearly gotten stronger at not just coming for the ball but before any slight contact he would drop the ball and pray for a free now regardless he is holding onto the ball which is a huge improvement.

Personally I would have said this type of coaching should have been obvious for years but if karius has the same improvement as migs has had with the coaching he will be a fantastic keeper as he is much quicker off his line and also much better technically with the ball than mignolet.


17 May 2017 16:43:29
Yes klopp was right to buy him because buying him has got the best out of mignolet. No he wasn't right to tell him he'd be first choice (because he hasn't shown the faith in him) . And no about telling the world. Also no to getting it horribly wrong, it's worked out quite well we've bought a bargain bucket GK who's young and talented and he's pushed our very expensive GK onto higher levels than previously expected. By hook or by crook it's worked out well for LFC. Mignolet would now be far more valuable to sell and his potential replacement is waiting in the wings after a season of training and gaining some experience. Obviously Karius won't be happy with this season but he's a transient employee of the club and a cheap one at that if he wants to leave with Ward a free replacement as number 2.


17 May 2017 16:55:27
Ed

Personally I would say Klopp was right in the way he went about things but it was the idiots that call themselves fans that pushed for Karious to be dropped and wrongfully so. Was Klopp right to drop him due to fans pressure? Absolutely not but that's the joys of Liverpool and the certain cretans that call themselves supporters.


17 May 2017 18:35:15
Pickford seems like a younger mignolet. His distribution is still poor. The upside is he has a lot of time to improve on that. His positioning and shot saving ability are pretty good (maybe better than Mignolet already) . I personally don't think we need a keeper.

The main reason I don't like Pickford, however talented he may be, is that a young keeper like him would struggle to organize an already fragile backline. Lord knows we need as much organization as we can get at this point.


17 May 2017 18:05:31
Your right Ed Imo Klopp has got the Karius situation horribly wrong.


17 May 2017 18:24:29
A) It's too early to say if Klopp made a mistake bringing him to the club.

B) If he promised Karius that he would unconditionally be the first choice, then that's a mistake. No player should be told that and doubt that happened here. If Klopp told him he was being brought in with the intention of becoming first choice, then I don't see the problem. The guy made too many errors, Klopp was right to drop him and Mignolet's recent form vindicates the decision. Karius can't have too many complaints.

C) I'll gladly hold my hands up if you can find the quote, but I don't recall Klopp telling the world that Karius was going to be his automatic first choice. If that's what he said, then yeah it was probably a mistake. I do remember him saying something like "Karius is currently my first choice" in Oct/ Nov, which was true at the time but gave no assurances toward the future. I don't see a problem with that - he was starting then, after all.

So no, Klopp didn't get it all horribly wrong. The discussion requires more nuance than simply chastising Klopp for his decisions.


18 May 2017 00:29:48
at that time Klopp was wrong about Karius and proved it by taking the lad out of the firing line after bigging the lad up.
Did you see preseason when a cross came over and Karius came to punch and nearly took the head of Lovren breaking his hand in the process.

From Klopp's point to of view he saw in Karius all the main factors required for a top goalkeeper but you don't know really how they are until you throw them in the deep end and see if they sink or swim.

Klopp decided that for the lads own benefit that he could do with some more swimming lessons and hopefully for us and Karius that this year he will get a better run of games to build confidence.
I'd say that Klopp has learned more this last season as any of the young lads.


18 May 2017 18:33:33
Great post, Savvy. In addition, Karius was brought in cos Migs had been a dud for 3 full season here. That is a fact. if Migs was very good, what was Karius doing here then?

People seem to have forgotten how dreadful Migs was before this season so those saying he did not deserve to be dropped at the start of this season, are talking nonsense as many of us here were fed up with his pathetic mistakes.

Karius is a very talented GK, no doubts and his struggles is not new to any foreign GK or player to the PL as that happens and that has not stopped players from being PL legends either.

Karius was dropped cos a set of spineless moaners chose to take sides with a manc and a paranoid ex red who bullied Karius for making two mistakes (as if his De Gea was a saint when he fist arrived) instead of sticking up for our own player. With fans like these, who needs the mancs and bitters.

Migs is improving but he had already reached the floor due to his many prior mistakes so the only place he could go was up. Let's wait and see.


19 May 2017 01:22:10
A lot of the problem is the set pieces .

If you concede a goal from a great piece of play, fair enough.

Conceding goals from set pieces is really demoralising for the whole team as they have obviously worked on them all week in training.


17 May 2017 10:44:39
Ive just been reading that Saints have said they could quite easily turn down a 60m bid for VVD this summer. This surely prices us out ed Despite you saying we have 4 CB's already. Do you think they are just trying to drum up interest in him?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - They don't need to drum up interest in him - it has been said following a discussion with another club. If Liverpool were to sell Gomez then they will look for another centre back as I have explained.}

17 May 2017 11:13:20
Is selling Gomez a possibility? Hope not.


{Ed002's Note - Yes it is. And if all these nailed on marquee signings everyone keeps telling me about are arriving, the club needs to make space.}

17 May 2017 12:12:59
Nailed on marquee signings? 🤔. Not what's needed imo. 2-3 players in certain posistions.


17 May 2017 11:46:03
Robertson and Maguire marquee?


{Ed002's Note - I am not aware of any approach by Liverpool for Maguire.}

17 May 2017 11:57:17
I think Klavan is more likely to be offloaded than Gomez personally if a CB was to be brought in. Gomez has been talked up by the club since he arrived as having huge potential. Would be strange to see him leave rather than a plus 30 defender who has shown he is average at best.


{Ed002's Note - No. Gomez.}

17 May 2017 12:09:31
Why is Gomez the only option to make space ed.? couldn't Klavan also be an option to make way.?


{Ed002's Note - Liverpool has made no efforts to sell Klaven, the player is not looking for more than his lot right now and there is no other club looking at him. Everyone here tells me that van Dijk has already agreed to join Liverpool, and as I have wasted my time explaining over and over about the actual situation - I can at least point out that space needs to be made. There is interest in Gomez, Klopp does not seem keen on him and his career is effectively on hold since recovering from injury.}

17 May 2017 13:24:35
No worries ed thanks for that mate. i think james pearce among others constantly telling us he is a priority is swaying peoples opinions. me included actually, when normally i usually keep my ideas on these things reserved to you and ed1s insight. I would find it strange for Klopp to allow Gomez to move on as he has said 2 or 3 times this season that he is a long term player for us and has a big future with us. And cos of his age and long stint injured he needs time to build that fitness base, consistency and confidence etc.


{Ed002's Note - So he should play him.}

17 May 2017 14:15:54
VVD is Chelsea bound imo.


17 May 2017 15:03:39
With Matip and Lovren likely to miss some games due to their constant niggles, a 3rd and 4th choice centre back is a necessity. Selling Gomez is not a vaible option, the boy is coming back from a serious injury and I didn't expect much game time for him this season.

But next season things might changed, he might get his chance. His fitness would have improved then probably. And as it has been mentioned before, Liverpool is not looking to add any CBs. A loan rather than a sale would make sense at this time. There are no quality CBs available currently, VVD for the famous quoted 60 million is also not going to happen.

In an ideal world we would have Matip, Lovren, Gomez and Sakho as our CBs but Klopp didn't handle this department very well. Ed002, do you see Gomez moving since you mentioned that there is interest in him?


17 May 2017 15:10:49
Absolutely sick of hearing about VVD, to be honest.

I'll be very annoyed if Gomez leaves - really liked the look of him pre-injury - but if Klopp isn't going to give him a chance then there's little point in keeping him at the club. The lad needs first team football somewhere. If he does go, I think the club will live to regret it.


17 May 2017 16:58:43
At the very least a decision to sell is better than fannying around. If Klopp doesn't want him, better he moves to Bournemouth for a profit. Personally I hope he gets a chance with us.


17 May 2017 18:54:29
If klopp sells Gomez I'll be livid.


18 May 2017 18:34:05
Spot on, TQ. VVD is overrated and simply not good enough for the system we play in especially with his lapses of concentration, pathetic positioning (always needing someone else to cover his arse like Fonte did for him and Lovren at Saints) . Though his has all the ability in the world, he's nothing than an expensive, overpriced Skrtel. As for Gomez, I would not be happy if Klopp sold him and kept Klavan. If any CB needs to be sold, it should be Klavan and not Gomez.


17 May 2017 10:29:43
Apologies if this had been asked before but if we do finish 4th what stage of the qualifiers will we enter?

Believable0 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - Play off round.}

17 May 2017 13:51:59
Square. Do you have any news on Joe and possibly leaving us mate?


17 May 2017 15:16:18
Thanks ed002 and last I was told was he'll be pushing lovren next season but I'll try and get an update.


{Ed002's Note - Thanks.}

17 May 2017 10:21:53
Although it is not a given, if we do get top 4 I would like to ask everyone here (incl the Eds if they are up for it) how would you prioritise the positions we need to upgrade in the summer?

For me the priority would be in the following order - LB, RB, CB, LW, GK, DLP (deep lying playmaker if it was too cryptic), ST and then an AM (attacking mid) .

The rationale? Well, when I look at our team I see fullbacks that are not good enough in the final third, centre-backs that make too many individual errors, us lacking a midfielder (apart from a fit and firing Hendo) that can dictate tempo as well as execute a long pass (more than 5 yards), lacking options available for left side of attack and finally a natural goalscorer up front (apart from a rarely fit Sturridge) .

Obviously we can't solve all of these as that would make Ed002's eyeballs roll into the back of her head :) but I would be disappointed (again) if we didn't focus on the first few priorities.

Believable1 Unbelievable7

17 May 2017 10:34:40
I reckon we will sign a LB and Milner will be RB next season.


17 May 2017 10:47:36
Jesus you want the whole team changing then lol. That's a team that looks like it'll get fourth and is the joint second highest scoring in the league.

For me, its just about strengthening. I would of course like to see Clyne moved on and a new left back in as well. We need another pacey winger who can beat a man. That's obvious. And possibly a new striker. The new striker is down to whether Klopp feels he can't relay in Studge. Even though last game he was the difference for me compared to the last few games.

Understandable us looking at another CM which would of course be because of Lucas looking like leaving.


17 May 2017 10:48:17
Lb
Cb
Str.


17 May 2017 10:52:22
It's obviously complicated as we don't know which players will definitely be leaving : Can? Lucas? Sakho? Coutinho? Gomez? Bogdan?
The squad needs beefing up for champions league. Beefing up means having players in the squad who the manager feels he can use to rotate the team. At the moment we have loads of players who don't seem to get a run of games. So any departures need replacing.
To upgrade as you put it, I would try and look at 3 positions maximum. Our 3 biggest weaknesses, if you exclude GK, are left back, centre back and DLP (as you put it)
A DLP would require a change in formation though.


17 May 2017 11:03:16
I did make it clear that we couldn't upgrade ALL of the positions. I just prioritised it as I saw it. That's all. :)

Of course if we just took care of the fullback and centre back positions and added a left sided wide player then I would be fairly happy.

The only reason I mention the other positions is that we have a group of senior players that are are struggling with injury across multiple seasons - ie Sturridge, Henderson and Emre/ Lallana to some extent. As we have seen with Arsenal, this can make or break your seasons.


17 May 2017 11:08:27
@Ron, would a DLP force a change of formation? Didn't Henderson play there brilliantly for the first half of the season?


17 May 2017 11:15:52
Full backs is a must. We need attacking full backs that can pick someone out and score the odd goal themselves (Not from the penalty spot before everyone says how many Milner has scored) . A top centre back would be great but not absolutely essential and a pacey left winger to allow Couts to play more central and deeper (if he stays) . That would be it for me depending on other outgoings.


17 May 2017 11:20:39
i would be satisfied if we could solve the fullbacks. the way we play, i think we mostly struggle because of those two positions, the rest i'm fine with.


17 May 2017 11:38:58
Essential would be a LB - that would allow us to sell Clyne, move Milner to RB with TAA. If we sell Moreno we could also bring in someone young to develop.

LW is also a priority - allows Coutinho to drop into midfield and then we can move Can deeper to cover Hendo and we don't need anyone else in midfield.

CB is a priority too - I'd like to see someone to compete with Lovren and Matip and I'd be Ok to see Klavan sold. Think he's decent but would rather keep Gomez and he struggles with the system we play which exposes him for lack of pace. Alternatively keep both and sell Moreno as Gomez can help cover LB if desperate.

Rest are luxuries, possibly a new Striker if Sturridge leaves - or if we don't get a LW. Possibly a GK but arguably Migs has made that redundant.

I'd be happy with just three additions to the squad.


17 May 2017 11:48:02
LB, CB and LW for me.

3 proven top level players for each position then see where that gets us.


17 May 2017 12:16:49
Actually don't mind the Milner replacing Clyne at RB idea.


17 May 2017 12:21:10
Lb lw and st.

Done move on.

Coutinho can provise all the creativity we need from the middle.

Sessegnon****/ gaya***/ tierney**/ mendy*
Brandt***/ forsberg**/ lemar*/ mertens****

The starz indicate which players together.

Mendy nd lemar becausw they already play together

Forsberg and tierney

Sessegnon and mertens because of age one 30 the other 17

Gaya and brandt. Gayas electric pace overlapping brandt.

Luan/ germain/ dolsberg

Any of the above wouls be welcome 😊.


17 May 2017 13:42:27
Think we all agree a LB is needed. Milner to cover both sides and complete with TAA at RB. Striker next for me, if he can play wide also then great, but we don't have a 20+ goal machine anymore (Not one that can stay fit anyway) . As much as I like Firmino and think he had done ok up top, I would prefer him to be playing behind a striker. I personally think we should be looking for a holding midfielder who will protect the CBs, someone more defensive minded than Henderson.
I would be happy with these 3 positions arriving, not sure we need a left winger as we have loads of attacking players who can play there, and if you have a new player on the left, Mane on the right firmino and Coutino plus a striker then you are only left with room for one CM if we keep to a back 4.


17 May 2017 14:44:37
A pacey wide forward would be my first priority. Followed by a lb then as all the kids seem to be calling them these days a DLP. Not much else depending on out goings.


17 May 2017 15:31:58
We do desperately need some left feet! It's agonising watching Milner run thank flank at times.

Ojo is left footed (I think) - I wonder what the plans are for him? He's clearly talented but it's not obvious whether he has desire required to step up right into first team football. There were some quotes about him trying to improve his aggression and intensity which is a good sign but also worrying if it doesn't materialise. Ed001 would know better there I am sure.


{Ed001's Note - I fear Ojo is a long way away from being a first team player for us.}

17 May 2017 18:45:19
It all depends on what the club plans to do with certain players as Ron has said, there could be some surprise and unexpected departures that would change everyone's opinions, there could also be some player nailed on to leave ending up staying. With that being said, it's clear we need to improve the first team, there is no point buying a bunch of potential squad players like we have done in the past. We either improve to first 11 or forget it. Those players that get replaced that are currently in the first 11 become the 'depth'.

If the first 11 generally stays the same then my priorities would be: LB, CB, CM (defensive or box to box mid), forward (ideally a player that can play as both a striker and outwide) . Probable positions are GK and RB depending on if mignolet and clyne end up leaving. For me they are not priorities and I would be content with mignolet and karius as our goalkeepers and Milner playing right back or TAA eventually replacing Clyne as our first choice right back. I would prefer more money being spent on the priority areas. We have to work within our means and replacing our whole team and selling players like lovren, Milner, mignolet, Lallana etc as people want to do after a bad performance is not working within our means and will set us back.


18 May 2017 18:35:58
Spot on, Kman. We have to be very smart in the way we target playwers cos we need those who not only fit the way we play, but can improve us quality wise and bring the type of desire and experience this young squad needs to get to the next level, mentally.

For me, the FB positions need a severe upgrade, first off. Then a wide player or two for either side, and then a midfielder depending on who is staying and who is leaving. A CB will only come in if one leaves as we still have Grujic to come in there.

Striker? Not sure as it would depend on Studge's status. The GK's are set, IMO if no one leaves.

Klopp has already said he will not make wholesale changes as that will only stifle other players from developing. We shall see.


17 May 2017 09:40:44
Just on the subject of Middlesbrough does anyone else think Adama Traore could be worth a shout in the summer? I know his downfalls he's greedy, picks the wrong ball, has no real quality on the ball and he seems to be one of those players that could have issues with his temperament (I'll stand corrected on that if anyone knows different) but his pace is frightening and can really stretch teams. At the right price, less than £15mil I think he'd be a potent weapon from the bench and could be coached in to a better player. It's a risk but what does everyone else think?

Believable3 Unbelievable12

17 May 2017 09:50:33
I think you answered your own question pip.


17 May 2017 09:55:18
Big risk and we already have Mane - rather we spent our funds on the area's we really need strengthening in.


17 May 2017 09:56:45
I know but he just has all the physical attributes to be a really good player! Except perhaps talent ;-)


17 May 2017 09:58:13
Come on pip, you should have realised halfway through writing this.


17 May 2017 10:04:46
You're probably right Hjikle but I just can't help thinking with that pace he has in a better side he could be lethal. Like I said it's a risk but I do love a player with lightening pace.


17 May 2017 10:05:25
Every time I see him I think that he's basically just Zaha but not quite as good.

And Zaha is not great.

So I would much rather give the role you are suggesting to Ojo or Wilson or Kent and use that £15mill elsewhere.


{Ed002's Note - What £15M? Why don't you propose not buying Neymar and using the £100M elsewhere?}

17 May 2017 10:10:29
Pip he seems to have no end product I would rather have ojo step up. Barca let him go for a reason like most kids these days they get a contract of a big club and think they have made it when really the hard works just begun you never know mind we got gini of a relegated club and he's been a vital cog in our team this season.


17 May 2017 10:13:13
On this basis I must be worth a shout.
I have all the physical attributes and no talent.
Anyone know a good agent? 🤠.


17 May 2017 10:19:01
I'm lost Ed002? The original post said £15mill?


{Ed002's Note - Is this the £15M Liverpool have set aside to spend on him?}

17 May 2017 10:20:27
Red is just using that figure because it's a figure I used Ed and I only used that figure as I don't think he's worth any more than that at the moment. I understand people saying about Ojo and Wilson etc. but it seems to me that Klopp doesn't fancy them or he would've thrown them in this season when Mane's been out when we were crying out for some pace in the team.


{Ed002's Note - And Klipperty has the hots for AT does he?}

17 May 2017 10:24:07
Ron I'd sign you just to keep everyone's spirits up 👍.


17 May 2017 10:25:26
I don't know Ed that's what you're here for 😉.


17 May 2017 10:26:54
No I just meant that the original poster had advocated spending £15mill on Adama Traore.

And I stated that we have players who can fill the role that he was suggesting, a sub who might come good, at the club already.

So instead of spending £15mill on Adama Traore I would rather use the money elsewhere.

Never suggested that Liverpool have £15mill set aside for Traore, it was the original post that stated that's what we should spend on him. Which I think would be a waste of £15mill.


17 May 2017 10:32:55
Woodburn then pip?


17 May 2017 10:33:05
Woodburn**.


17 May 2017 10:53:42
Cheers pip, I want my image rights protecting though 😎.


17 May 2017 11:04:11
Thomas Cook. . Ron.


17 May 2017 11:09:59
No worries Ron we'll need someone to do that when Lucas goes. Jamesy I like Woodburn and Klopp obviously likes him but he's hardly got that raw pace that Traore possesses. I doubt Ron has either but when it comes to positivity there's no one better 👍.


{Ed001's Note - I would rather put Ron in the team personally, he would have to be better than Traore.}

17 May 2017 12:40:47
He's also been relegated twice in two seasons for two different clubs. It's got to say something.


17 May 2017 18:58:07
come on mate, he may be very fast but he doesn't know where his legs are, let alone where the ball is in relation to his feet.


17 May 2017 22:25:39
Ron I've got $5 spare to buy your image rights. Come to Oz and Ill buy you a beer to seal the deal:-)


18 May 2017 07:18:24
You're on phil 👌.


 
Change Consent