Liverpool Rumours Member Posts

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.


(single word yields best result)
 

kjmainstreet's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing


No Profile Picture uploaded

Team: Liverpool


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




kjmainstreet's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To kjmainstreet's Posts

 

 

To kjmainstreet's last 5 rumours posts

 

To kjmainstreet's last 5 banter posts

 

To kjmainstreet's last 5 rumour replies

 

To kjmainstreet's last 5 banter replies

 

kjmainstreet's rumours posts with other poster's replies to kjmainstreet's rumours posts

 

17 Jun 2017 18:14:37
Echo reporting that we have had a major boost in our attempts to sing Mendy from Monaco. Personally don't believe it myself but he would be on the list for ones I would try and persuade (without tapping up). I believe city seemed in pole position to get the deal done, has that stalled at all or us the echo just feeding us false hope again that this might happen?

kjmainstreet

1.) 17 Jun 2017 18:41:50
I reckon it's false hope as mendy is looking for outrageous wages, we're talking north of £180k a week.


2.) 17 Jun 2017 19:23:51
Echo reads this page before writing an article, so that tells you what their word is worth.


3.) 17 Jun 2017 20:40:27
When an echo article is posted with *headline* - transfer rumours they are rumours picked up from other outlets they are just reiterating what other papers are saying.

It's the other articles where the echo are actually reporting information they get themselves.


4.) 17 Jun 2017 22:33:36
Mendy at 200k a week would be worth it.

Rather that than a new lb every season. Get the best one avavliable right now.


5.) 18 Jun 2017 03:42:10
It's not an original Echo report, it's gossip they've regurgitated in their gossip column. That's how clickbait works, X club will stall their negotiations for Z player, Y club haven't made any formal approaches, so then the papers will publish: "Y Club handed MAJOR boost to sign Z player! "


6.) 18 Jun 2017 06:17:32
Supermane-We can't pay £200k a week on a left back, that's just obscene.


7.) 18 Jun 2017 07:38:14
180k . its not really outrageous in this day and age is it.


8.) 18 Jun 2017 07:54:21
It's outrageous but if you want the top players, you have to pay the big money.


9.) 18 Jun 2017 08:08:08
I really am concerned by fans saying things like this.

Mendy is a good left back overall, because offensively he is top class. His pace, power and final ball make him an asset in the final third.

However this is a guy who literally cannot defend. Monaco won the league by outscoring everyone. Mendy and Sidibe were the biggest problems for them defensively because as Carragher would say, they are failed wingers.

Don't get me wrong, I'd take Mendy happily. But if people think we are getting the finished article who will solve everything defensively and justify £40m with £180k a week on top; well in my opinion they are sorely mistaken. If you care not for the finances of the club then yes, he is the best option we've looked at. He really isn't the best value though (in my opinion of course) .

{Ed001's Note - not sure about the full backs being their biggest issue, every time I saw them they struggled to defend through the centre more than the flanks. In particular Fabinho would get caught out a lot for me. I think the full backs getting caught out was more a consequence of the way they played than a lack of defensive ability. They may well lack it, but whenever they were back and facing up, they always seemed to handle the threats well, when I watched them.}


10.) 18 Jun 2017 08:38:40
I do agree in some respected MK and I wasn't necessarily referring to LFC directly when I said top players command the big salaries, as it is with football these days.

When you factor in all the costs when buying a player, I would rarely see value in today's game mate.

Except maybe Delle Ali of course, where our club failed to see the value in a £5m transfer. But we must have thought Benteke at £34m was value.

It's Bonkers.


11.) 18 Jun 2017 09:52:02
If we were willing to pay vvd £200k a week then mendy would be worth it . Good Attacking fullbacks are like gold dust right now in football. Get him along with a good defensive midfielder who can cover when fullbacks attack would be perfect in my opinion.


12.) 18 Jun 2017 11:28:44
Do people here not think about the consequences of paying a new player north of £180k a week? And a left back at that! The likes if coutinho, mane, et al would be wanting at least the same and if not more - deservedly so. It sets a precedent for the wage structure of the whole squad. It's not a one off deal. The long term effect just doesn't justify it as a realistic deal.


13.) 18 Jun 2017 13:48:47
Left back is arguably our weakest position so I don't mind the club splashing out to rectify it.
I don't mind the club spending big as long as it's wisely, if Mendy is going to have a similar impact to say Mane (we where desperate for a wide player, getting one worked wonders) then go for it.


14.) 18 Jun 2017 20:03:01
Both MK and Ed01 are spot on as whether Monaco fullbacks can defend or not is debatable based on the way they play. Sidibe came from Lille where being defensively sound as a unit is paramount. Mendy came from OM where his athleticism and attacking prowess were his main assets but he was a liability defensively and could not defend against a chair. Now will Mendy work here? I don't know but 180k or 200k is way too much for a defender that is defensively dodgy.


 

 

17 Feb 2017 01:40:28
can ed002 clear up a bit of a rumour I heard?
supposedly lfc are close to agreeing A pre-contract with solanke from Chelsea. can you please confirm this or even if lfc have any interest? (
many thanks.

kjmainstreet

{Ed002's Note - Liverpool are not allowed to speak to Solanke nor agree a pre-contract with him. If they have been speaking to the player then that would without doubt result in a very significant fine and perhaps a transfer ban. I cannot believe that they would be that stupid. They can however talk to his representative (his step-father) who was dealing with Chelsea in trying to reach an agreement over a new contract. Chelsea has no interest in being held to ransom and paying him the outrageous asking price for his salary - and would therefore be more than happy for him to let his contract run down and join another Premier League side (as it would significantly increase the compensation due). I understand that the player himself has already had a discussion witha representative of Celtic. He is a decent player of whom much is expected - but his financial expectations are way beyond Chelsea's means.}


1.) 17 Feb 2017 08:40:56
Thats saying something if his demands are outside chelseas means!?

Ed, you say cannot believe that they would be that stupid. I'm just wanting to understand. Are you saying that they have spoken direct with him ir that they wouldn't be stupid enough to?

{Ed002's Note - The original poster said that Liverpool were close to agreeing a pre-contract - I explained that Liverpool are not allowed to talk to the player nor agree a pre-contract. I then explained why he is available. It is perfectly clear.}


2.) 17 Feb 2017 10:25:51
thanks for your response ed002.


3.) 17 Feb 2017 10:44:45
Why is a representative of celtic allowed to speak to the player directly and not liverpool, is this because celtic are under the SFA and liverpool the FA? In other words is this because liverpool are from the same governing body as chelsea and celtic are not?

{Ed002's Note - Yes, correct.}


4.) 17 Feb 2017 12:52:40
Who enforces that rule Ed? Is it the FAs to stop the poaching of players to rivals or is it UEFA/ FIFA?

And what do you believe the purpose is if you don't mind me asking?

{Ed002's Note - UEFA enforce it via local FAs. It is to stop the disruption of rivals making approaches to players who have contracts up for discussion or running out.}


5.) 17 Feb 2017 16:50:59
Is he just a youngster the ed?

{Ed002's Note - It is nothing to do with his age.}


6.) 18 Feb 2017 08:36:58
Sorry ed i meant by that he is probably a kid seen as one for the future and not first team ready.

{Ed002's Note - Really? If Liverpool are willing to match his wage demands then he will be very happy and Chelsea will be happy with the compensation and to be rid of him.}


 

 

23 Jul 2016 22:25:49
lfc and Bournemouth supposedly agreed a fee for Bradford Smith. around 6mil according to reports.

kjmainstreet

1.) 23 Jul 2016 22:47:48
Bradford? 😄.


2.) 23 Jul 2016 22:47:48
Bradford? 😄.


3.) 23 Jul 2016 22:52:48
Have the Eds heard any rumours regarding Oscar Wendt to Liverpool? I remember him being linked with us years ago, but recently heard his name mentioned as a possible target, on another forum.

{Ed002's Note - A Hodgson target when he first arrived? Sure, why the hell not.}


4.) 23 Jul 2016 22:59:46
damn predictive txt on me phone.


5.) 23 Jul 2016 23:24:37
So potentially 22 mil for two fringe players. that's another plus for using the academy, of course you want to have them star for you but if there not deemed good ebough, once they have a good amount if appearances for a team such of ours, couting there age aswel, the fees are there for us to demand.

Ojo has a season or two now and if he doesn't maie it its another 10/ 13 mil just ib potebtial.


6.) 24 Jul 2016 01:03:21
Thatd be the advantage of developing youngsters. Cyncis would say fsg buy youth players solely for the intention of selling for profit. But I don't believe this at all. If the player pushes on and can contribute at 1st team level then he will. But if not then at least ya haven't wasted 30-odd million on someone like benteke. flipsidee being that opportunities need to be given for the youngsters to impress, which does make it hard for them to break through.


7.) 24 Jul 2016 02:10:37
Faithinworks, arevu saying no opportunities given to young players? Are u following liverpool at all?


8.) 24 Jul 2016 03:33:38
I think you'll find what I said was - " flipside being that opportunities need to be given for the youngsters to impress, which does make it hard for them to break through. "

if that translates to "no opportunities given to young players" then I'm sorry, I can't help you.


9.) 24 Jul 2016 07:10:31
Its a complete myth about fsg buying young to sell at a profit.

All clubs buy for the academy and then any young players who we've bought for the starting 11 we've massively over paid for them ie firmino.


10.) 24 Jul 2016 11:09:49
You think if we sold firmino now we wouldn't turn a profit? Karius, gruijic, Gomez, Ings, origi all players that if we sold in a few years we'd get more than we paid.


11.) 24 Jul 2016 11:37:33
I believe we would make a profit on Roberto Firmino but have a revolutionary thought, let's not sell our top assets.

{Ed041's Note - he washout best player in the second half of the season for me. If GW price went up after his poor showing last season RF value will of definitely increased.


12.) 24 Jul 2016 12:14:24
Fencey we would make a small profit yes but not the sort of profits people make out.

The way people go on is like fsg buy for a few mil and try and make a fortune.

Carrol didn't make anything, benteke won't either.


13.) 25 Jul 2016 08:04:07
Use of academies is always going to vary depending upon the size and wealth of the club. Smaller clubs, e. g. AFC Wimbledon, have a stated policy that they want to make half their first team home developed. They don't have the money to do anything else and can't afford to keep players around on good contracts as back ups.

But clubs like Liverpool are not going to be replacing half their first team squad every year or two so obviously most of the kids who come through the academy are going to be released or sold. That isn't a policy of signing them to sell them.

You would hope for 1 or 2 players good enough every few years realistically. But you can't just put the best player on the pitch on their own, they need a squad of around 14-15 each year they run a team. Realistically that is 14-15 lads who won't come through. That thins out post 16 but it still remains the case that the 17-21 year olds are almost all going to be released or sold. You can't keep them and bearing in mind you'll have fresh youngsters coming through this is just an ongoing cycle. If you can make some money from that natural cycle then that makes business sense but it still doesn't mean they are signed to be sold.

Even Chelsea you could argue aren't doing that, they have the cash to cast their net wider and sign in bucket loads of youngsters in the hope they find the odd one or two who are special. That they make money from loaning them out isn't necessarily why they do it.

Ironically, a kid wanting to play for a big club could be argued to be better off going into the set up at a much smaller club as that gives more chance of making it into the first team and at a younger age, which is the irony as then they have more chance of getting to a big team than a kid sitting in the age groups at the big club.

{Ed002's Note - Right - "clubs like Liverpool are not going to be replacing half their first team squad every year or two".


14.) 25 Jul 2016 08:19:55
ED - ok change that to shouldn't be if they get their recruitment right first time around, should also say if you replace managers regularly you'll see big squad changes but rarely to bring through youngsters, in fact you may see lots of existing youth binned for an influx from the country of the new manager. Either way, not going to replace half the squad with academy products.


 

 

31 Jan 2016 22:21:37
ED002, can I ask a question that may seem odd even conspiracy theory like?

I am not for one minute saying this to be the case or have any info on this whatsoever but can I ask a bit about the teixeira offer? I seen on earlier posts that you said the owner of shakhtar kept on putting the price up when Chelsea came calling about teixeira so subsequently a deal was not concluded. Did lfc know all about the ongoings between the 2 clubs? I only ask this as I have a little theory (I have had a few scoops tonight so i will deny all tomorrow) it seems pointless lfc entering negotiations or any talks with shakhtar if they knew how awkward they were to strike a deal with, that is unless we did know and had no intention of getting teixeira but looked good to the fans craving a big money signing? All bollocks and I know this wouldn't be the case but been sitting bored for last hour.

kjmainstreet

{Ed002's Note - Liverpool would have known that there was a certain futility in making a very low offer and never really increasing it. Shakhtar has done nothing but said the player will be sold in the summer - they have known for months that he wanted to leave this year. If they had read these pages they would have known what happened with Chelsea and the increasing price - I have made no secret of it. There is no conspracy and people should not forget that the club is in a precarious position financially. Perhaps the offer was all they can risk.}


1.) 01 Feb 2016 09:25:30
cheers for your reply ED002 as always is most appreciated. I won't try and ask if we interested or sign anyone today. try enjoy your day guys you ALL do a top job. 😆.

{Ed002's Note - I would not expect too much to happen with LFC today - hopefully no knee jerk buys. I could see one leaving and a loan or two outbound perhaps. Have a good day.}


2.) 01 Feb 2016 09:41:35
Ed, can you explain what you mean by "precarious position financially"? - Have we NO money, have we been bought by chancers? ( yet again) According to statistics prodcued, we are around the 8th richest club in Europe, so god help the rest if we are skint. Keep up the good work!

{Ed002's Note - I have explained the financial position on many occasions. I have no idea what you mean by "richest".}


3.) 01 Feb 2016 10:57:05
They are not chancers IMO
They have invested lots in transfers plus associated fees
They are funding the ground upgrade.

Give them a break. I think the precarious position is because the club is borrowing money against future income and losing money weekly.
We have to get the wage bill under control, we have to get the squad number under control and we have to optimise income from sponsorship, gate receipts/ corporate and all that requires a successful team.

I think they need to rein in the spending, generate money from sales and utilise the reserves more. We need to hold our nerve and not throw more good money after bad.
The modern day fan has grown up with 5-6 in-coming transfers a season. They must change their perspective and realise this is not sustainable and complete folly. You win things with consistency, you don't become consistent by having a revolving transfer door. That just makes you poor.
All opinion.


4.) 01 Feb 2016 11:24:03
I am not surprised Liverpool are in a precarious financial position.

Having had a manager who spent fortunes on donkeys and loan-outs.

However there are some good buys and money from good sales.

I got grief because I called Benteke a donkey. Which was unfair on my part. Expensive mis-fit would have been a better description.

The walking wounded list is unfortunate.

Liverpool have agreed personal terms with Alex Texeira, he wants to come. Shaktar are digging their heels in. Why keep a player that doesn't want to play for you?

{Ed001's Note - because they will sell him in the summer and want him until then.}


5.) 01 Feb 2016 11:36:56
Do we have a good chance of him in the summer then ed? Its a long way off i no. Will we have to start from scratch with him again?

{Ed001's Note - depends on whether we still want him then or not really.}


6.) 01 Feb 2016 10:35:15
Ed can you say who might leave us and who the loan might be please? Youngsters?

{Ed002's Note - Sinclair - and the sqaud is too large so a couple of loans would not be a surprise.}


7.) 01 Feb 2016 19:02:57
Ed002 I've had no offers nor made any bids.

All the best.


8.) 01 Feb 2016 20:44:17
Just thought I'd mention this 'precarious financial position', ED2 mentioned. It's not actually precarious in the slightest. We have an interest free loan from the owners, but it's not the size of Bolton - the commercial team will manage to sell some form of rights on the new stand - of that, I am positive.

Outside of our interest free loans (which are exactly what Chelsea and Manchester City had before they were written off), we're in a solid financial position, based on reasonable accounting of outgoing vs incoming transfers and the length of contracts offered to new and current squad members.

For example, Migs new contract was likely offered to allow for a longer accounting of the original fee paid. Allen isn't on for a new contract for two reasons. A) there is only £4.5m remaining of his transfer fee to be allocated in accounts - his value is currently low. To increase and preserve that, Liverpool would look to sign a new deal with him. However, I still see him being sold in the summer.

I'm still predicting a small profit (around £10m) in the next financial reports, prior to the influx of overseas rights money. I may be wrong in my predictions (I wasn't last time), but I wouldn't call that precarious, by any means.

{Ed001's Note - how much of a debt do you think Bolton have? Bearing in mind their owner just wrote off some of it. I don't think you quite understand the issue is not debt with Bolton at all. It is not having the cash flow to keep up with payments such as tax. Profits or otherwise are not really relevant, the accounts can be messed around with very easily to make a business look profitable if need be. The issue is that underneath it, the spending outstrips the income.}


 

 

21 Jan 2016 11:13:52
if ED002 would be so kind in providing us an update in Alex teixeira if possible?
I looked on the Chelsea page search engine and I seen a post from yourself when providing transfer updates for the guys and gals over there, you said you expected a deal to be done in January can you confirm if Chelsea still interested or have they taken a step back now? if so do you know the reason why, or was it the 2 clubs simply not agreeing a fee? I understand you a busy man and don't like to give hour by hour updates but this seems to have come way out of left field if this whole lfc teixeira rumour is true. thanks ed for your time and patience.

kjmainstreet

{Ed002's Note - Shakhtar's Alex Teixeira has accepted an offer to join Chelsea in January, but the move remains subject to (a) Shakhtar deciding to sell - and their owner is blocking any move at this time; (b) the clubs agreeing a fee and terms - but they have been negotiating - but the price was raised considerably, and (c) the player being able to pass a medical this month, . Juventus and and PSG have a declared interest and Spurs have watched him recently but it is unlikely an eventual move to Chelsea can be disrupted - but I suspect the summer is far more likely now. I am travelling at the moment so I am not sure what is happening with Liverpool.}


1.) 21 Jan 2016 13:02:48
Cheers ed002, your reply was a big help.

{Ed002's Note - You are welcome.}


2.) 21 Jan 2016 14:54:53
He (Alex) fits the profile of the players we are after, young with a hamstring injury.


3.) 21 Jan 2016 16:10:55
he's not that young, Roy.


4.) 21 Jan 2016 16:54:05
And he doesn't have a hamstring injury, they have confirmed that rumour was false.


5.) 22 Jan 2016 06:19:44
Read Ed002s reply!
He ain't coming to Liverpool if the deal to go to Chelsea is tied up.

Good old Daily Star! reliable as ever in writing rubbish.

{Ed001's Note - the player accepted an agreement, but the club didn't, read what Ed002 said again.}


6.) 22 Jan 2016 19:10:42
Fair point. Still can't help thinking this is unlikely to happen.


 

 

 

kjmainstreet's banter posts with other poster's replies to kjmainstreet's banter posts

 

22 Jul 2017 15:15:31
Coutinho and salah will get all the plaudits and rightly so both where awesome. But henderson this second half has shown that he is vitaly important, keeps things ticking in the middle of the park and tell you what he breaks the play up unbelievably aswel. Well done Hendo.

kjmainstreet

1.) 22 Jul 2017 15:24:51
KJ, Hendo just like Wiji, have always been important players for us under Klopp and that has not and won't ever change. It is his detractors many of who have ne idea why they slate him cos they just do it cos those around them do it, that unfairly slate him without watching him closely to see all the dirty and unflashy work he does on the pitch.


2.) 22 Jul 2017 17:03:55
Hendo was excellent. Great to have our Captain back!


3.) 22 Jul 2017 17:14:52
Per Echo FSG has told Klopp the Magician will not be sold.


4.) 22 Jul 2017 17:38:09
Then, that settles it then. Time to focus on the preseason and get ready for the season ahead as it may be a quite memorable one, hopefully.


5.) 22 Jul 2017 19:46:46
Of course and that's why Klopp is looking at a more dynamic playmaker in Keita. Lol. Second half was all passing Sideways Brendan Rodgers! Wijnaldum was cut open by Mahrez not once!


6.) 22 Jul 2017 21:31:22
Imagine when Mane is thrown into the mix too! Salah and Mane terrorising from the flanks and any one of Firmino, Studge, Origi, Solanke occupying them in the middle with Coutinho and hopefully Keita pulling the strings in midfield. Wow!


 

 

03 Jun 2017 23:42:58
Understand people might not think we need vvd or need positions more than a cb what I loathe about this is why on earth offer player x amount to then change and lo ball the player? Did fsg not think he would say yes to us and agree to city deal so can say well we was in for vvd but he wanted x amount of money that only city would match? Bit wrong me thinks.

I could even understand if they said right we have a wage structure in place here, we can offer this amount but you coming to a club you could be loved and play every week and maybe sell the club to him. If he rejects us then and moves to Chelsea or city yes I understand lfc fans would be pissed but at least there was reason and can say we wanted him we have a wage structure in place here and maybe he was after more money.

Don't mess around, offer one amount let him agree then shaft him. If all above is true I wouldn't even negotiate with lfc anymore, I would move somewhere else.
Rant over.

kjmainstreet

1.) 04 Jun 2017 01:12:24
Sounds like we entered into negotiations initiated by their camp and to me it looks like they were demanding basically a ransom fee for his services. So for a player in a position that we were told by the eds that we're not looking at players for, we have done exactly the right thing. For a player that was desperate to come to us it's is amazingly convenient that he has now gone to the highest bidder. Would love to hear this confirmed by the eds but to me it just sounds like the agents was doing his job and shopping his commodity for the highest price. Presumably van diik will now fall into a state of depression because he can't play for us, and will now slump his shoulders and reluctantly play for city.


2.) 04 Jun 2017 06:08:02
How can anyone blame FSG here. We have a wage structure and have stuck to our guns. Van dijk and his agent must be having a laugh if they think were going to break our wage structure.


 

 

03 Jun 2017 21:16:10
If what I'm reading is to be believed (and I don't for one second doubt macca) that we risk if loosing out on vvd over changing what I assume was either wages or maybe diving on fee after an offer has been made then fsg need to pull there heads out of there arses.

I'm not going to go into detail if we need vvd instead of full backs or anything else that isn't my gripe here. Klopp has obviously gave the green light to go ahead and get vvd. now I get a club walks away if a transfer fee can't be met as clubs usually disagree on fees so son so fourth sometimes negotiations happen and things.

kjmainstreet

1.) 03 Jun 2017 22:52:04
We've lost out on VVD. I only hope we don't then go for substandard players like Keane or Gibson.


 

 

15 May 2017 11:23:34
Oh the sturridge conundrum, on the pitch no-one seems divided here excellent player who would get in most prem teams. Problem is injuries, I wouldn't like to speculate too much but I can't imagine firmino would have missed as many games for lfc as sturridge has if he had same problems sturridge has had. I really didn't realise tho the involvement he had with the younger players and I think square Tomato has said gas been excellent with Joe Gomez so good in him and seems a nice enough guy. My worry tho is his injury record doesn't seem to be changing pattern and I can't see it changing if he at lfc next season either, the amount of games missed through injury since he been at lfc is astonishing I could understand it more if he has had a long term injury like gomez or ings but it's when he gets knocks and the amount of time it takes him to get back to fitness, whether that be mental, poor fitness coach at lfc or something else I don't know but he on a big contract and I think only has 2 years running on it, he 27 at what many would consider peak age is the gamble worth taking trying to get another season out of him if history shows us it isn't going to be much different regarding his injury record. We in a stronger place to negotiate this summer with potential buyers (depending if there is any) with him being fit and scoring end if this season at 27 years of age with 2 years left than taking a chance of him only having 12 months left next season being another year older and maybe another year disrupted by injury?

kjmainstreet

1.) 15 May 2017 11:55:22
We may not have any choice but to keep him - it will be a brave club and manager who commit to paying his £150k wages and a hefty fee for him.
In fact I would call it a big gamble.


2.) 15 May 2017 12:53:17
That one of my points, I don't like to pretend to know exact figures but I would suspect a transfer fee between 20m-30m and wages of around the 150k per week amount. I don't know agent fees or whatever would be involved but seems like a hell if amount to gamble on. West ham get linked a lot with him but surely that would swallow a massive amount of there budget on a player that may only make 20 appearances? Would love a fit studge at liverpool because when he is he genuinely class. Only time will tell I suppose.


3.) 15 May 2017 15:40:57
I agree on his day he is great but he HAS had chances this season and one good game doesn't change the fact that he has been absolutely woeful all season long. I was at the Southampton semi final and he was dreadful. Great talent when he decides to actually try.


4.) 15 May 2017 15:47:23
Great point made here, lads. Another question is that who would pay the say 30m and 150k in wages for a very talented player who unfortunately, cannot be relied upon in the least bit, to be fit on a consistent basis? If LFC tried to do that for a player like Studge, there would be massive protests cos we would all view it as a waste of money, right? Therefore, we may be forced to keep him cos no one will pay that money and the high risk (with very little high reward) . They may have to restructure his contract or something to make that happen.


5.) 15 May 2017 17:36:30
He has not been woeful in any respect. Whenever he's played he's been amongst our better players.


 

 

08 Apr 2017 19:05:30
Crazy game today. First if all I'll get my grievances out of the way. I seriously think when stoke seen out team they would have been lifted immensely now I'm not saying he has to play coutinho and firmino every game but with the injuries we have and studge severely lacking match practice I was worried. I think the team contributed to the first half as we looked like a team that hasn't trained with 3 at the back and stoke having a huge lift seeing out team sheet.
Second half was completely different tho. Arguably we conceded the best chances against us from second half but mignolet produced when we needed him too. I think it really important that we keep couts and Bobby not only that add quality players that if they do become tired and injured then the replacements can do nearly as good a job. That will be some task for klopp to get right. As all lfc fans hope let's get this 13th spot sorted and plan for a proper challenge next season.

kjmainstreet

 

 

 

kjmainstreet's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

25 May 2017 15:02:46
I agree I think another loan for DW would be best for all, even better if it going to be a prem club and getting prem game time experience. According to the echo tho DW will stay at LFC next season and compete with mignolet and karius. Seems a massive mistake to me, I only see him as no3 next season which will massively stump his development.

kjmainstreet

 

 

Click To View This Thread

17 Feb 2017 10:25:51
thanks for your response ed002.

kjmainstreet

 

 

Click To View This Thread

24 Jan 2017 11:47:33
I personally can't see this happening but going back to the summer window and I remember having a convo with a few reds and ed001 about who would like to see us sign and my target was William carvalho. looks a destroyer in the middle of the park and after watching the euros in the summer was very good on the ball. would be a good signing in my opinion, this signing would surley mean the end to stewart at lfc tho in the long term. the lad is 23 and by now would be thinking about his options especially if carvalho or indeed another central midfielder signed.

kjmainstreet

 

 

Click To View This Thread

24 Aug 2016 13:36:37
I take on board what you are saying ed001, and I normally agree with most things you say but regardless of fees or who we have bought do you think Hart is an upgrade on mignolet? I agree with what a lot of people say he is English so the players get hyped up and made to be better than what the actualy are and I agree Hart falls into that category but I still think he a good keeper. he seems to me to be a vocal keeper who is respected by his fellow peers, I respect everyone's opinion on this matter and ov course if it was as easy as everyone agreeing we wouldn't have football forums. hope we can agree to maybe disagree on this one ed001?

kjmainstreet

{Ed001's Note - what difference does it make if he is an upgrade on our back up keeper? The question is whether or not he is better than Karius. Sorry but peers respecting him? What does that even mean? That his fellow pros aren't slagging him off? When do you ever hear a current player slag off another current player publicly? Try watching Hart flap and throw the ball into the back of his net repeatedly, then you will see he is the English Mignolet, crap with the ball at his feet, unable to organise a defence and not much of a shotstopper.}


 

 

Click To View This Thread

24 Aug 2016 12:27:16
I don't think signing karius is a 'mistake' or anything I jus think our league is a difficult one to get used to and Hart has been a number one at a massive club playing for many years as first choice. he has had adversities throughout his time at city and has come through them. he has the right mentality to succeed and be a winner. as I said in my above post I hope karius proves to be as good as some of the German keepers in recent history. I just think In my opinion that we would b buying a ready made winner in Hart who would have been an upgrade on mignolet. as for ward I think a years loan at a championship/ lower prem team is best. unless klopp made him his number one this season because he needs to be playing regular football.

kjmainstreet

{Ed001's Note - Hart has been number one purely because he is English and they want an English core. 4 managers have been there and not wanted him, surely that should tell you something? All of them didn't think he was good enough but struggled to recruit a replacement, until now. Hart is just not very good. He has done nothing in his career other than been behind a good team so he never had anything to do.}


 

 

 

kjmainstreet's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

22 Jul 2017 18:57:33
Ed002, if report's are correct and lfc have or will make a £75m offer do you think this is the amount the deal could be brokered on?

kjmainstreet

{Ed002's Note - I have no feeling at all for it - and any submission will be in €s not £s.}


 

 

Click To View This Thread

21 Jul 2017 17:58:20
Player power is a joke these days. I would love vvd at LFC but let's be honest if coutinho does what he is doing now everyone would be outraged. Clubs don't have the power anymore. 😡.

kjmainstreet

 

 

Click To View This Thread

19 Jul 2017 17:52:58
Gomes has a lot of potential and I think a good run of games would benefit him immensely. I just don't think he quite ready for starting a long run of games in the current lfc back four. He made a few mistakes today and personally think it would be jumped on by so called fans and his confidence may drain if he was doing this at top end and champs league level. I think a season loan at a mid table to lower prem team would benefit his education at Then we can assess again next summer and see what level he at. Let's not forget he still quite young and hasn't played a lot of football in last 18 month so loan is best in my opinion.

kjmainstreet

 

 

Click To View This Thread

10 Jul 2017 23:13:36
I only seen the endish of Fowler, Owen I liked, Stevie g made me get out my seat but I can't forget the feeling when Fernando Torres left. Looking back at it now lfc done well to get what they got for him but in his prime I thought he was amazing.

kjmainstreet

 

 

Click To View This Thread

30 May 2017 19:53:48
I fear for ings if I'm being honest. If he can get himself fit then a loan would be best all round in my opinion because as things stand I can't see him being any better than 4th choice and the lad needs games after his 2 years if hell.

kjmainstreet