Liverpool Banter Archive July 02 2016

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

02 Jul 2016 22:45:18
Following on from the discussion earlier about a betting company sponsoring us.

I just got around to reading the replies and someone said about how betting can destroy lives.

I mean deary me, I know a lot more people who have ruined their lives with alcohol. I don't recall any complaints about Carlsberg being our main sponsors for the majority of the premier league era.

Just seems like people are looking for a stick to beat our owners with, yet again.

If anyone is genuinely stupid enough to see a Liverpool training kit and think "you know what, I might throw my life away on gambling" then I'm sorry but that is not the fault of the club, or the betting company. The fault lies solely at the feet of the person who betted irresponsibly.

And just for the record, I have never even been into a bookies. I occasionally put the odd £1 accumulator on using an online site. Bet I have never bet more than £1 at once. So I'm defending it because I like it!

Believable11 Unbelievable12

02 Jul 2016 23:38:28
Should say "So I'm not defending it because I like. "


03 Jul 2016 00:10:39
Dead on, nice post. People just want something to complain about when it comes to FSG.


03 Jul 2016 02:20:31
Just because you enjoy it, and are capable of gambling sensibly, doesn't me it is a good idea or that everybody else has the same amount of restraint. The scientific literature does not support your contention that is solely the fault of the person who gambled in the first place either. Like all forms of addiction (addiction is classified as a mental health condition) gambling addiction is more than a person "deciding" to throw money away - it is an uncontrollable behaviour that spirals into chaos. Just like how lots of people can drink alcohol without issue there is a percentage of people who will become addicts - those addicts only need 1 drink and that's it, the control is gone. The same applies to betting - most people might put on the odd accumulator or have the odd flutter but there is a percentage who, once they start, cannot stop. They are not "choosing" to ruin their life, they are addicts and they need help not encouragement.

I believe the clubs image and ethos is very important to how it is perceived, both in England and abroad, and I don't think it needs to have a betting company anywhere near it. This is not having a go at FSG, this is me saying that, i mu opinion, this is a poor move by the club.


03 Jul 2016 02:54:15
That wasn't the reason I complained about the betting company logo on the shirts. I wasn't using it to moan about FSG, who I happen to think have been as good as anyone could have been. Try reading the posts properly. It's a complaint in moral grounds; I would rather alcohol, payday loan companies and betting firms were all banned from shirts. By the way, Barcelona give money to UNICEF, not the other way round.


03 Jul 2016 03:07:14
I disagree. The availability of online betting will attract more people towards it so I don't necessarily think that it is solely at the feet of the person, the company will also have some level of blame. Its like saying heroin addiction has nothing to do with drug dealers. Although there are lots of other factors in play I think it's safe to say that there is a positive correlation between the two. Not that I oppose a betting company sponsoring Liverpool. It's exactly like what you said regarding Carlsberg.


03 Jul 2016 06:22:56
You are speaking from a position of ignorance MK, I've seen what gambling can do to a person first hand, a family member of mine a few years back was blowing his wages on FOBT, in the bookies, some days going without food.

Your trivialising a very serious subject to defend the owners, which is abhorrent in my eyes, and I suggest you research gambling addiction before making such stupid comments.


03 Jul 2016 06:35:59
Would you not have an issue with Benson and Hedges advertising on the shirts then, MKScouser?


03 Jul 2016 08:41:39
Every other advert on the tv during the footy is a gambling advert. A few words on a training topic nothing compared to that. Get down off your high horses and enjoy the fact that we're still commercially attractive at the moment. This deal helps pay towards our club.


03 Jul 2016 09:50:34
Just because its ubiquitous, doesn't mean its right unicorn.


03 Jul 2016 10:34:40
Choose your scumbag.
Most major corporations have ruined someone's life directly or indirectly whether it be gambling, sugar, alcohol, cigarettes, tax dodging or financial institution causing global recessions. None of them should be trivialised.

Your damned whichever you choose IMO.


03 Jul 2016 10:48:40
Fair enough guys.

Let's just get back to talking about transfers, tactics and stuff rather than argue amongst ourselves.

I see where people are coming from, but it's just coming across as the 21st century PC brigade to me. Whereas to you lads, I'm bound to be considered ignorant. That's just the way of the world today, so no change there ;)


03 Jul 2016 10:51:43
waro, agree with what you are saying, I've seen a friend lose everything through online gambling, but there is no difference between alcohol, drugs or gambling; all destroy lives.


03 Jul 2016 11:12:12
100% agree with that Ron.


03 Jul 2016 11:56:10
Barcelona pay UNICEF but also have a mega-deal with Qatar Airways for their shirt-fronts and a deal with Beko for their sleeve. Maybe best not to talk about working conditions in Qatar if we're taking moral high-ground?

I don't particularly like a betting company on our kits but no bank or alcohol or loan company is any better.


{Ed001's Note - the deal with UNICEF was purely to get the fans to accept shirt sponsorship, it is not through altruism at all. The deal with Qatar is far more than just the airline on the front of the shirts as well.}

03 Jul 2016 12:01:36
I would just like to highlight this part of your message MK "If anyone is genuinely stupid enough to see a Liverpool training kit and think "you know what, I might throw my life away on gambling" " as someone stated this is speaking out of ignorance in I'm being honest. I'm speaking from a point of view of someone who has had a bad gambling addiction and has had to seek help, but people don't see the advertisements and think they're going to gamble their life, it's more towards people who already have the addiction or are dealing with the addiction, same way if someone quitting smoking smells smoke as they walk past and then suddenly want one themselves, or as stated someone quitting heroin sees their drug dealer on the street and the temptation automatically starts, well a gambling addict seeing a betting company every weekend they watch there team play can have the same affect I'm not saying it will to everyone but to a minority of people it really will.


03 Jul 2016 13:26:05
@ Mike g. WHAT?


03 Jul 2016 17:48:38
@Anniefields that's completely different. B&H advertisement, like all tobacco advertisement here, is illegal so no that wouldn't be preferred .

MK isn't saying he's supporting it as much as he just doesn't see it as so bad. In this world most advertising can be questioned ethically. Alcohol sponsors on football shirts for a fan base with a culture of drunken violence / McDonald's sponsoring kids athletics and sports tournaments.

They don't match up and in an ideal world we'd all get rid of them but they pay the bills. This is NOT an FSG problem this is a worldwide culture issue.


02 Jul 2016 22:42:17
I am somewhat disappointed we have not heard the term 'smokescreen' for ages!
Surely someone has a smokescreen conspiracy rumour.

Believable4 Unbelievable1

03 Jul 2016 02:00:04
Ken Aguero? Anyone?


03 Jul 2016 02:38:52
Klopp is actually the smokescreen, Rafa Benitez to be named manager on the 8th of August.


03 Jul 2016 06:51:36
No, the smokescreen is good old Woy coming back to replace Klopp. Why do u think he resigned? because he knew LFC were after him after Klopp ended up a major disappointment.


02 Jul 2016 21:51:47
Looking likely Lovren will be named captain next season.

Believable1 Unbelievable9

02 Jul 2016 23:45:00
Have I missed something?


02 Jul 2016 23:50:52
Haha, from a guy on Twitter I may add who has no history of being reliable.


02 Jul 2016 20:39:38
Eds can you see the death of international football? Well I don't mean the actual death.

I think it's well accepted that this particular championship has been pretty brutal! Me personally I find international football boring and slow! I've more an emotional connection with lfc that the rep of Ireland.

I think a lot of fans would be of the same opinion.

Believable3 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - not sure, I never really watch international footie any more, it bores me to tears. I really do not care what happens so long as the Liverpool players do not get injured.}

02 Jul 2016 20:51:53
We all say this but could you beay a proper run to the final for yoye country?


{Ed001's Note - yep, Scouse not English. Couldn't care less what England do.}

02 Jul 2016 21:02:21
I'm not really even scouse. Dads side is (Worcestershire) English with Welsh heritage. Mums side is (Northamptonshire) English. I've spent my whole life in the East Midlands.

But I couldn't agree more with Ed001. I am far more emotionally connected to Liverpool than England. As soon as England went out I was a bit embarrassed that my country invests so much money into a sport they are terrible at, but I still laughed at their extent. I'm just backing the Welsh instead now. I still don't care who wins the tournament though.

I'm still disappointed about the Europa final, sod the Euros. All I want is for Liverpool's pre-season to start as I'm hoping to get to a few of the UK based friendlies.

International football is just something to pass time in my opinion. I honestly couldn't care less. No matter what shirt they are in, I refuse to support Everton, United or Spurs players. All I want to see is Liverpool's players do well and stay injury free.


02 Jul 2016 21:53:16
After the Europa league final I didn't open any social media on my phone for nearly a week.

In regards to this championship the most entertaining thing was the fights instigated by the Russians.

Which leads me onto the next point. World Cup next in Russia. Surely dither nail in the coffin of international football, who in their right mind would travel there to be assaulted.

On a more positive note, great to see the lfc players back in training.


02 Jul 2016 23:15:56
It's a bit weird for me, because this is the first major international tournament that my team (Wales) is playing in. I am never usually that bothered by England, except for when I was younger, say 10 or 11ish - I enjoyed watching Shearer and Sherringham, and Stevie Macca, but that was about it. I can't stand the attitude of (many) England supporters, the arrogance, the blind assumption that England will automatically beat so called inferior sides without actually kicking a ball. Have to say I have been immensely proud of the Wales team, they have really encompassed what the game is about, pride and passion and working your ass off for your team mates. This is the first international tournament I can remember actually enjoying. Still desperate for the start of the season however. International football is like a different sport.


02 Jul 2016 22:06:30
Club over country every time.


02 Jul 2016 22:00:12
Fantastic second reply ed001 👍👍👍.


02 Jul 2016 20:20:59
i guess next season we will see premiership teams ditching the 4-2-3-1 in favour of the 3-5-2 line up judging by the success had play teams deploying this formation in the Euros
Just as last season the 4-3-3 was ditched by most teams.

Believable2 Unbelievable4

02 Jul 2016 22:22:25
4-2-2-2 is the way to go like our greatest sides and the incredible Brazil 82 team.


03 Jul 2016 08:04:02
Brazil used 3-5-2 in 2002 and had no problem winning the WC, winning every game they played. I've always loved this formation and the last team to use it to perfection wast the Costa Rica team of 2014 with Kaylor Navas in goal. They showed that if you have the right player personnel, you can succeed with it. Italy played it well too because Lippi used it a lot while Conte played at Juve and Dino Zoff used it at Euro 2000 again, where Conte was a starter. Hence as Juve coach, Conte used it and Allegri now does the same so the transition was seamless.


02 Jul 2016 19:42:58
Just seen a rumour online PSG to replace the united bound sweedish legend with our Daniel sturridge for £50 million. Just thought I'd leave this in the banter section.

Believable4 Unbelievable2

02 Jul 2016 22:08:33
Old rumour from March. . no chance.


02 Jul 2016 18:59:37
Liverpool are a joke concerning buying players. We pay far too much for mane but pay what Southampton will accept yet mess about with zeilinski at 12 million or close to that. I'm surprised many clubs still do business with us.

Believable3 Unbelievable15

02 Jul 2016 19:08:17
So they are damned if you do and damned if you dont? Will Mane be too much at £30 million if he has a blinding season? Will Zeilinski be too much if he is a squad player and hardly gets a kick? I would suggest holding off until the end of the season before going into hyperbole. You just don't know how it will pan out.


02 Jul 2016 19:21:29
Al buddy. Do you not think it's what the club see's players worth. I don't think Mane is worth is £32-£34m yet. Ultimately it's upto the club to find a agreement with the selling club for the player/ we are interested in. The one factor with Mane is, he does have PL proven experience. Okay it doesn't add £20m+ to his price tag. It's still what LFC were prepared to pay. Maybe they only see Zeilinski as £10m (? ) player and no more.


02 Jul 2016 19:25:50
People where saying that about firminho whan he was signed.


02 Jul 2016 19:29:50
Irish
Maybe you should read the posts on the page. I've a feeling you stare at the words for a length of time trying to interrupt info.
I could have sworn the edd's have said at different times that Liverpool have messed about club's and players concerning attempting to buy.
Definitely could have sworn I've read that a few times but maybe I might be wearing your glasses and oblivious to some of our dealings and how the club conducts itself.


02 Jul 2016 19:35:00
Gazza mate
Type zeilinski into the search engine. Edd001 mentions loosely how we conducted ourselves regarding zeilinski.
This is what my point was getting at.


02 Jul 2016 20:00:30
Big Al = doubter 😠.


02 Jul 2016 20:44:07
So if your issue is with how Liverpool dealt with Zeilinski which i agree with then why bring Mane into it? As i have said you or i or anyone else have a clue if £30 million is too much. You didn't want him, you brought into his "bad attitude" and youve got your knickers in a twist ever since. You don't need to bring it up on every post to make your point. Big Al didn't want Mane, move on.


02 Jul 2016 22:12:02
I reckon your a manc big Al. 😱 just sayin.


02 Jul 2016 22:39:54
I get your point Al, in how we conduct our business. My only thing is saying we paid too much for Mane, the price of players is on the rise and £30 mil is the new £20 mil if you get my meaning. The money is rediculous and not worth talking about anymore as it leaves us all shaking our heads.
If business is done correctly we get the player we want, but pay a lot more it seems. If we find other routes and the player wants to leave, then it's regarded as tapping up, the price is lower but the transfer will take longer - but will generally happen.
Not a perfect formula, just a general observation. We need to change they way we do business, negotiate in the correct routes and keep it clean.
Don't think of Mane as a £, judge him as a player once he has played at least.


02 Jul 2016 23:32:05
Waro I have thought that a few times myself!


02 Jul 2016 19:16:49
Nothing to do with the money. We tapped up the player which pissed Udinese off, Hence they have no interest in a deal with us. Had we approached straight forward Zielinski would have been a Liverpool player a month ago for his actual price or even less.


03 Jul 2016 00:27:22
We get destroyed for jerking other clubs around about their valuations of players and when we actually pay what a club asks, its criminal overpayment on our part. Going rate for players is going up, get used to it. Our own Joe Allen, whom we valued at 10 mil going into the Euros, will probably fetch 12-15 mil now if LFC decided to sell.


03 Jul 2016 00:54:20
Big al spends a lot of time at the united page, posts a lot on there.


03 Jul 2016 08:06:28
Al, if we pay what they ask, you say we pay over the odds. If we stick to our guns and not get jerked around, you say we are messing about. Make up your mind, pls.


02 Jul 2016 18:22:26
Just a thought. what's the possibility for we won't be buying any more players this summer? I mean, all we hear about is just rumours, and the squad is complete even tho we could use some improvement in a few areas. Could this be it for us now?

Believable0 Unbelievable5

{Ed002's Note - RTFP.}

02 Jul 2016 18:38:55
The club are actively trying to sign Chilwell and Zielinski.

They have also expressed varying levels of interest in Gotze, Dahoud, Subotic, Nkoudou, Silva and Amavi.


02 Jul 2016 19:25:26
Lets take the LB situ. Chillwell seems to be our number one choice. Amavi had been looked at and discussed also. The club is not guaranteed their first option every time, alternative signings will be considered and known. We still have a hell of a lot of clearing out to do. I think there will one or two regular first teamers who will be subject of enquiries and or bids. What if the bid is a good offer, if the squad is trimmed down. That player need to be replaced?


02 Jul 2016 17:34:37
Liverpool after Sissoko of Newcastle, the player wants to go Arsenal though. not a player I would look at personally, but in this case I think we do need a strong powerful cm. Our squad looks a little short and weak IMO.

Believable0 Unbelievable12

02 Jul 2016 18:19:19
He's French after French players what's to work under Wenger.


02 Jul 2016 19:27:21
They have Xkaka. Not going to sign Sissoko too.
He's not consistent enough to be considered for us. Where we going to play him? Hendo, Can, Stewart, Lucas and Grujic already at the club as centre midfielders.


02 Jul 2016 17:51:45
Sissoko wouldn't improve us at all.


03 Jul 2016 08:07:49
Whatever Sissoko added to Newcastle that got them relegated, I want none of it at LFC.


02 Jul 2016 17:31:56
Ed001, what's your take on Ben Davies and would you like him at the club?

Believable0 Unbelievable3

{Ed001's Note - average full back at best. Nowhere near good enough for us. Though he has improved on his woeful stamina he had at Swansea. He would be out on his feet after an hour there. Lacks quality delivery and is poor defensively.}

02 Jul 2016 17:45:58
Thanks for the reply, better than Moreno though?


02 Jul 2016 18:41:37
Better than Moreno. Could Moreno successfully play as a third centre back like Davies does for Wales?

Thing is, Moreno is not a benchmark for a good defender.


02 Jul 2016 20:01:45
Sorry Ed, I love you, but davies can defend and although I'm not saying snap him for £30m, defensively he would be a huge improvement on Moreno.


{Ed001's Note - I have never seen any evidence of defensive ability in him. To suggest being better than Moreno defensively means he can defend is ridiculous. Davies is a second rate left back, behind the very poor Danny Rose in the Spurs side because he is worse than him. He is simply not a good player and it is simply the systems used that covers his weak spots, which are numerous.}

02 Jul 2016 20:32:16
Then we will have to agree to disagree Ed ;) I think defensively he reads the game well and is calm in defence. Some of his performances this summer have shown that.

I personally think Rose gets picked as Poch rates him better going forward as he uses high full backs.

Again I'm not saying he's world class and we should sign him etc.


{Ed001's Note - if he could read the game he would be a good player, but he can't.}

02 Jul 2016 15:36:02
Ed just wondering if Grujic needs to registered in the 25 man squad or is it only home grown players under 21 that don't have to be?

Believable1 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - He is under 21 so no.}

02 Jul 2016 16:44:32
Rumours that Allen will be staying if we can't get zielinski. Whilst I agree that we should not buy for the sake of it, surely we should be looking at someone better than him. He has had seasons to prove what he's got, and if we can't find someone who wants to come to us, that we can buy who would be an improvement, then it's not a good sign. Hendo and can first choice, and Lucas and Stewart options too, plus branagan and chirivella if needed. I'd rather just sell Allen and play chiravella or branagan more often.

Believable2 Unbelievable5

02 Jul 2016 17:14:01
So you want to replace him with someone better, but think we should use two players that arent? (and yes I'm aware they could eventually be better. Possibly. Maybe. but they aren't right now)


02 Jul 2016 17:33:09
I'd say that right now Lucas, Stewart and Brannagan already offer much more than the headless chicken Joe Allen, a man that seems to have tricked people into thinking he's improved because he's grown long hair and a beard.


02 Jul 2016 19:23:41
Floss. You haven't got a clue bud are you watching the euros? Fcuking 100 times better than any of English mid wilsher. hendo. dier. we're all shit and can't dictate a game at all whereas Allen with Ramsey look the bollocks. Give credit where it's due he gives his all for us and Wales.


02 Jul 2016 19:30:22
Nothing wrong with growing longer hair and a beard. Trying to disguise myself after a name change so Ed002 accepts my invatation to a drink. For informative purposes of course 😉.


02 Jul 2016 19:47:10
Headless chicken. really?

That's how much we like our players.


02 Jul 2016 17:38:38
Lucas offers nothing to the first team Hence he played much football for the second stringe team in the PL closing stage last season. People need to come off from this Lucas love. Bang average.


02 Jul 2016 17:54:12
@Gandhi define more? Lucas and Allen are very different players and offer some very different. Equally Brannagan is a different type of midfielder and so to say one offers more than the other is hard because they all do different roles.


03 Jul 2016 00:42:56
hmasson, yes I am watching the Euros but as Ed001 says, it's dangerous to judge a player in international football since the game is so slow and the players are given so much time that even the fat kid Wayne Rooney can occasionally look decent.
The fact is Joe Allen at his best is still nothing special, Henderson for example is twice the player. Allen is simply not good enough.

Game of Thrones, if you think Lucas offers nothing then you are simply not worth arguing with because you clearly know nothing about football.


02 Jul 2016 16:43:49
Concerning communication amongst the team, most especially in the defence, I honestly believe this was a major part of the problem. Was this a language thing or a chemistry thing?

Believable1 Unbelievable1

02 Jul 2016 17:10:15
it was a Skrtel (poor communication) / BR problem, it has been solves by JK.


02 Jul 2016 17:31:19
Partly solved by Klopp but we still gave far too many silly and soft goals away.


02 Jul 2016 19:12:44
I agree natural poolie. Our defensive issues have been far from sorted out and its not all down to Skrtel.


02 Jul 2016 17:55:18
Definitely not SOLVED. In our last game we conceded 3 goals in the 2nd half in a major European final.


02 Jul 2016 16:05:52
Joe Allen likely to stay after deals for Zielinski and Dahoud are unlikely to be concluded.
Meanwhile Dahoud has rejected a contract extension at Borrussia.

Believable1 Unbelievable10

02 Jul 2016 14:50:07
There's a statement on here that should never die and should make it into the book of football quotes (if there's anything like that) :
"A great team can beat a team of greats. "--Andy K, July 1, 2016.

Priceless in my opinion!

Believable16 Unbelievable0

02 Jul 2016 17:26:24
Definitely. We've all seen it many times.


02 Jul 2016 20:48:12
Thanks Noski although i don't think i can claim it as mine.


02 Jul 2016 14:40:24
Balloteli says he is going to win the ballon d'or. Great news as I thought he was just a joker. He returns to training with Liverpool this weekend. Is there any hope some club is foolish enough to buy him? Celtic maybe?

Believable4 Unbelievable3

02 Jul 2016 14:49:54
Brenda should do the right thing and take him off our hands for 17mil.


02 Jul 2016 16:16:52
Brendan should do the right thing and apologize to everyone involved at LFC for shifting blame for every failed signing on the TC.


02 Jul 2016 14:21:21
Eds (especially 002), I know you always say not to get hung up on the money, but who at the club was drunk and turned down the 25 million for benteke? Obviously he's a good player in the right system and still young. And I know we want to minimize our losses. But come on! We need to start getting rid of some players. And if they don't come back with a second offer, we could be stuck. We're already going to have one hell of a time selling ballotelli, markovic, Moreno etc etc. Just seems crazy if you ask me.

Believable1 Unbelievable8

02 Jul 2016 15:36:53
The club believe Palace will pay the 30 million eventually. Why settle for 25 when we know Palace have a lot of dosh to throw around? Benteke will be like a marquee signing for them, and Pardew will not want to miss out.
Have patience my friend.


02 Jul 2016 164:36:21
Palace to sign Benteke. Avoid the money the club will recoup as much as possible.


02 Jul 2016 17:09:44
We paid 32 mil i believe for him i think 30mil is a fair return considering he is pretty fresh from sitting on the bench all season for both club and country.

If we have to fork out for players i see no reason for us not to maximise the value of our own when selling.


02 Jul 2016 13:52:26
Seen it about today about sissoko from newcastle is there any truth in it? i think he would be good signing as often we get bullied out of games in midfield an while we on the subject of lookin at newcastle players surely wjildum could be an option.

Believable1 Unbelievable6

{Ed002's Note - Try the search engine.}

02 Jul 2016 13:43:10
Hi Eds, I'm curious, is Mario Balotelli likely to get a chance to impress Jurgen in pre-season or are we going to pack him off to China when the first offer comes in?

Believable1 Unbelievable2

{Ed002's Note - Why would he want to go to China? As I have said, Liverpool is completely overrun with forwards - space needs to be made in the bloated and ballooning squad.}

02 Jul 2016 13:21:34
Neil Jones from the Echo has said that we are trying to sign either Dahoud or Zielinski and that Joe Allen wint be sold if we can't get one over the line.

Believable1 Unbelievable3

02 Jul 2016 12:45:11
Eds/ Reds

Can i ask if an Ed or any posters has any idea who makes these crazy decisions i mean betting companies who are disgusting and don't deserve to be promoted hell no!

Then there was the ticket pricing and I'm just wandering who is it behind these decisions is it one person? a committee? Its really annoying it also creates tension between us fans i understand we need money but we can't sell our soul not for any price! YNWA.

Believable0 Unbelievable2

{Ed002's Note - It is the club who is responsible.}

02 Jul 2016 14:44:53
Wint, does that mean he will / won't be sold.


02 Jul 2016 12:15:42
Not sure if it's relevant, ........

Believable1 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - You are on the wrong page, this is the Liverpool page.}

02 Jul 2016 10:58:15
Hi Ed001

As an older statesman I have always been of an opinion of trying to support players who show their support for the club, even when they are going through poor patches.
Its sad to see people using social media to lambast players constantly, and even worse people who have little knowledge of football echoing the opinions of otheres (such as yourselves) just as an excuse to feel some kind of self importance.

Joe Allen is a perfect case in point. Every time Joe Allen has put on a red shirt he has given 100%, Noteably he has good and bad games but his desire to play well has never been in doubt. Its a very similar scenario to Lucas - I remember the amount of people who had a go at him calling him useless, and through his detemination he became one of the most reliable players in the team.
Someone on the site said let's get rid of Allen and play Brannagan or Chiverella, wow what a statesment, do we really want to throw these youngsters in with some of the supporters we have - they will be teared to shreds ruining thier confidence for good. Jordon Ibe looks teriffied when he plays for Liverpool, and that's probably from the vile he reads on social media.
Joe Allen is not the best player in the world but as a squad player he is someone any manager would want, he trains hard, is commited and when called upon rarely let's us down, as it proved many times last season. In all Wales games he has been consistently one of the top 3 plaers, controlling the tempo of the game, keeping the passing short and neat. He has the support of the fans and shows it.

I know your not that keen on Allen but that's football its all about opinions, however when you hear the dross on hear, most of it just echoing your opinions by sychophants, it gets my back up.

Just a little gripe on the people who use the site to constantly troll our players.

Thanks ED001.

Believable9 Unbelievable5

{Ed001's Note - actually he let us down repeatedly. The opposition midfield constantly ran past him like he didn't exist.}

02 Jul 2016 11:48:40
The problem is as much as he's been wonderful for Wales your trying to compare international football which is slow to the demands of the prem which is fast, I like Joe he's a tryer and a battler and in the right system he looks good, but he just doesn't have much of a role here with the mountain of midfielders we do have, Stewart isn't exactly 19 anymore and the other lads need games before we start wasting anymore young talent like we have in the past
Just a note to either ed01 or 02 any news on Alberto? Is he back for pre-season and is he definitely one who wants to leave? I caught him a few times last season and thought he'd do a job under Klopp big shame if he's going i reckon but i suppose we can't house so many midfielders at once.


{Ed001's Note - the club wants him gone if possible.}

02 Jul 2016 11:58:51
Cheers buddy, would we be hopeful of a fee? Or is he just going to be set free as it were? It doesn't matter to me it just seems a waste of talent once again.


{Ed002's Note - The club will want a fee.}

02 Jul 2016 12:10:47
Joe Allen fee 25 million.


02 Jul 2016 13:20:41
Evered, I abhor abuse of players as well but there is a difference between that and commentary. As fans we should talk about who's playing well and who's not, it's what being a fan is all about.

Job's been at the club for for years and the odd good performance does not make up for the fact that he hasn't had a positive influence on the team. Liverpool aren't in a position where they can carry a player because he tries hard. We need to get better and that means replacing under performing players.

When Joe leaves I'll say Thank-you very much and welcome him whenever he returns but I do think it's time for him to go.


02 Jul 2016 16:36:48
I was the poster who mentioned Chivarella and Brannagan so allow me to retort. Allen is a player who has been, at best, mediocre. He has constantly failed to perform and has shown that he can offer little (in either attack of defence) consistently. I know you might be wetting your pants because he came of the bench for us and looked good a couple of times, or because he has played well in an International tournament were the standard has been lower than most top tier European leagues, but he is not good enough. We have no European football next season, we have at least three players currently in the squad ahead of him (Can, Henderson, Milner - I don't agree with that last choice but hey ho) another who I think is far better than him (Lucas) and a couple of youngsters who really need to be given more chances to prove themselves (Chivarella and Brannagan) . Oh and we are also looking at Zielinski and seem likely to sign him. On what planet does keeping hold of Joe Allen make sense?

You talk about Allen giving 100% and trying to do well - so what? That should be the bare minimum for players pulling on the red shirt. He doesn't deserve praise for that, because it's what I expect every player to do. He ran about a lot, in a similar vein to Milner actually, but it completely ineffective in the middle. He has never looked an effective player for us and we have much, much better within the squad and potentially much better in the academy. This is my reasoning for him to leave.

For the record I never said throw in Brannagan or Chivarella into the first team but guess what? When they have been they've looked good! Much better than Allen! So I hope Klopp gives them more chances. There is also a big difference between criticising established players and youth prospects - if Allen was 18 I would, of course, not be so blunt. But he isn't, he's 26 and shows no sign of improving - I'm not being horrible to him, or trying to be obnoxious, I'm simply stating my opinion on the player and his role at the club - he hasn't done enough and, in the current circumstances, needs to be moved on. You have offered no reason, so far as I can see, to change my mind.


02 Jul 2016 16:20:12
There is a lot of hype and euphoria surrounding Allen right now. Its a genuine opportunity for the club to recoup at least 10-12 million for him than let him walk for free next summer. Allen does not fit into Klopp's high intensity play, so better to move him on. Our 2 man midfield also looks lightweight and easily penetrable when Allen's part of it, so move him on. His performances at the Euros has no bearing on his LFC career. The pace and intensity of football in the BPL and Euros is totally different so thinking that Allen's form will continue into next season is just ridiculous.


02 Jul 2016 11:04:32
I wonder if and its a massive if I know, if Balotelli gets his head and act together what he could do for LFC under Klopp.

Believable1 Unbelievable14

02 Jul 2016 11:56:35
Now he's an absolute tool Alan let's be clear BUT you can't help but think surely in the name of William Shatner the pennies going to drop one day and a top drawer player will emerge, surely he's got to mature at some point? he's a proper head scratcher this boy, what a waste of talent, I suppose we'll see when pre season begins buddy, be a cracking achievement by Klopp to get him playing, I wonder if he's thought it an option or if he's just written him off, anyone have any info? Eds?


{Ed002's Note - Liverpool is completely overrun with forwards and his agent has been told to find him a new club, but there is a little something going on with Mino that Liverpool need to resolve before any move can happen. I expect him to move on.}

02 Jul 2016 12:51:04
Agree Ritchie, the penny has to drop sometime and that's my point, if it does could be a good player for us and yes the pre season training will find him out one way or another.


02 Jul 2016 13:28:14
I'll be pulling for him. Someone may correct me, but over the last two seasons is it fair to say his off-field transgression have reduced? Anyways, as a person his development will be incremental. He was never resiliant enough to manage his career once his natural talent let him down. I really hope he can make aomwthing of his career, wherever that is.


02 Jul 2016 14:49:00
His off-field antics maybe, but the bigger problem with Balotelli now is his on-field performances. At least when he was setting off fireworks in his bathroom he followed it by scoring the first goal in the 6-1 rout of United.

In the last 2 years i don't think he has shown that he even has the natural talent everyone speaks of, even when trying hard for the team, and he looks a shadow of his former self which was sporadic at best to begin with.

Not saying he can't come good. But we can't assume Klopp's only problem is getting his head right, he needs to coach a decent player out of him again too.


02 Jul 2016 10:39:16
This what Balotelli said at a short press conference before flying back to Liverpool "My future is hopefully at Liverpool and definitely not at Milan, who let me go and to whom I won't return and on a scale of 1 to 10, my last two seasons have been a 5 and Conte was right not to choose me as I have underperformed due to injuries and other reasons. But I want to improve and get to Ballon d Or levels. "

Yeah right lad prove us all wrong then.

Believable9 Unbelievable0

02 Jul 2016 11:02:00
You'll still have the Klopp crowd saying klopp can make him a star hahaha.


02 Jul 2016 12:43:13
He only stated a few months ago he was saying was never happy at Liverpool and wanted to stay in Milan, guys a tool.


02 Jul 2016 13:29:12
Red - people can change their minds. The team sucked when he was here. And that wasnt all down to him.


02 Jul 2016 17:40:49
The last time he played for us was under Brenda so maybe now Klopp here he could of had a change of heart. Plus the press only print what sells papers and people are constantly quoted out of context. Not sticking up for the guy just saying.


02 Jul 2016 10:32:37
‪Karius, Grujić, Markovic, Mané and unfortunately Balotelli will all train with Klopp for the first time today ‬.

Believable7 Unbelievable0

02 Jul 2016 11:33:40
What about matip?


02 Jul 2016 12:13:06
Yeah mate he's there too missed his name off.


02 Jul 2016 10:05:35
I think we should buy Will Griggs, may be a player swap with balotelli. He is a good finisher, a fox in box type striker what we r missing at this moment, someone who can score 20+ goal. He could be our Vardy.
I can feel the "will griggs" song being sang in anfield in full voice.
To be honest i just wat us to have the copyrights for "will griggs " song, possibly we can get the song to #1 in uk charts. Any chance ed?

Believable1 Unbelievable12

02 Jul 2016 12:40:47
How about not buying another striker over already 3 at the club? Let's keep the money and spend it on a top class CM / DM. Someone who would stand like a mountain in the middle and we would concede very very less?


02 Jul 2016 13:29:06
Brother that's sarcasm. And all I want is to sing the song in anfield.


02 Jul 2016 09:41:23
I thought Wales voted for Brexit. Why are they still at the Euros? 😊
Well done Wales.

Believable6 Unbelievable5

02 Jul 2016 09:09:27
Not Liverpool per se ....

Believable0 Unbelievable3

{Ed002's Note - Take it to one of the relevant pages please.}

02 Jul 2016 08:50:48
If there was one company I didn't won't near Liverpool fc it's a betting agency, sorry but gambling agency saying it's great to be part of the Liverpool family just doesn't work for me, never will.

Believable9 Unbelievable5

{Ed002's Note - You are right Liverpoolkiwi it is not something which I see as a good thing either. In a number of countries betting concerns like tobacco and alcohol companies cannot sponsor sports teams - but I fear you will soon see lots of nifty offers to entice fans on the club web site.}

02 Jul 2016 09:28:26
So betting to go with dunkin donuts.
So we're going to be skint, fat and have type 2 diabetes. Lol.


02 Jul 2016 09:48:43
Haha classic.


02 Jul 2016 09:53:43
Yep totally agree!

Some posters have highlighted that the hierarchy at this club only care about money, I never took much notice of it but after this i believe it so. And to add insult to injury they don't care about the image of the club!

Unacceptable! (truly)

Think its petition time or boycott the training clobber!?


02 Jul 2016 10:10:33
Unfortunately it is a sign of the times that we are living in. We all want the best players at our club and the money has to come from somewhere. Personally I hate McDonald's but they provide money for every event. Not ideal but it's the way of the world. Who liked carlsberg when they sponsored us? I wouldn't buy any product from sharp when they sponsored man united. We will never all get what we want but we want the money. As I say, not ideal but I can live with it.


02 Jul 2016 10:25:43
Agree totally. What's the need for it? It just shows that the importance of image is being placed below the importance of a few extra bucks. Bad decision, whichever way you look at it.


02 Jul 2016 10:30:33
Get with the times lads. Betting is major part of modern football, like it or not.

You either progress with the game, or get left behind. We got commercially deserted in the nineties and noughties. Finally we have owners who are progressive and trying to build sustained success, and they get stick for agreeing to advertise a betting company?

You can't be serious about a boycott? The Premier League have an official betting partner for Christ sakes. You going to boycott the premier league? Or Sly Sports for having their own betting company? Or BBC for advertising betting before during and after every single Euros game this summer?

Honestly, some people are stuck in the stone ages. It's additional sponsorship and if that makes us even slightly more competitive on the pitch, I'm happy. I don't actually know anyone who follows football who hasn't at the very least stuck a £1 accumulator on every once in a while.

Get off your high horses. It's not going to subliminally convince all LFC fans to start gambling irresponsibly. It will probably just make a lot of people who already bet on the football reconsider which betting agency they should use. I had a lot more reservations over a bank being plastered across the front of the main kit. If anyone has shafted the working man, it is banks. Not betting. Nobody batted an eyelid then though. Whilst I was skeptical initially, I didn't care one bit when I found out the magnitude of the sponsorship deal.

Leicester City gave out thousands of free bottles of beer last season. Is that not also supporting a bad habit? Did anybody care? No, you all just moaned about how much more of a community they are.

Hypocrisy of the highest level. I actually cannot believe this thread. It is yet another example of how the modern world has gone mad with 'political correctness'.


02 Jul 2016 11:14:59
Dear mr MK

Thanks for that lovely essay! It was an interesting read.
Just a couple of points the fact that the premier league bbc and sly sports have connections with a betting company does not mean we should (really they shouldn't either) but i don't care about them I'm Liverpool FC! there's a word for people who follow and that word is Sheep!

Where does this bet victor money come from?

The suffering of people gambling addiction i mean people are pi$$in away their mortgage payments or takin food from their kids mouths because they going to win this time! Getting into serious debt and in many cases are driven to the extreme and hurt themselves or others.

So basically what your post should have said was f--k it we getting paid!


02 Jul 2016 11:42:31
When I saw bet victor on the front of the training kit I thought it was some type of joke. I can't stand these betting companies, victimising football fans every chance they get. Look if you have a few quid and want to have a bet now and again feel free, it's a dirty habit but that's on you. But there's a lot of people who have suffered through gambling addictions and lost families and even their own life who I have known personally, all through the stupidity of betting. I don't want Liverpool advertising or promoting something that can alienate a lot of people, even through religion.

Doesn't matter what era we are in MK, betting companies are filth and should not be promoted by a club of Liverpool stature. Just because you like betting doesn't make it right.


02 Jul 2016 12:06:59
Mmmmm I'm unsure on this one but just because we are sponsored by a gambling company doesn't mean people are going to go out and bet. People who like a bet will still bet, the sun will still shine etc. It's just another investment into the club and it may be questionable but I wouldn't spend too long worrying about it. Just concentrate on your team and if they are going to win things. People are far to quick to want to get involved in this type of debate and plan boycotts etc. just stick to the football side of stuff. Just my opinion but I don't care who sponsors us to be honest just as long as we are successful on the pitch.


{Ed002's Note - Football fans are very easily led as we know. The temptation should not be put to them - and no doubt there will be lots of "attactive offers" for the Liverpool supporters. I would caution against it.}

02 Jul 2016 12:11:17
Kman92 you are spot on. These betting companies are filth and make money out of the misery of their victims. I don't want to see either 'pay day' loans or betting companies smeared across our glorious shirts. They will be no purchases in this household of any gear bearing those companies names or logos. It is nothing but an attempt to groom young, impressionable people into wasting their money with these firms. It is a disgrace that the club hierarchy think so little of the fans. They need to get a grip and understand these concerns. It is not a trivial gripe and I don't care if it's all around us, sanctioned by immoral government, Liverpool are better than that.


{Ed002's Note - It is nothing to do with the Government and Liverpool are not "better than that" because it is exactly what the club has done.}

02 Jul 2016 12:40:57
The joys of "the business" taking over the football.


02 Jul 2016 13:10:05
You having betting stands in the ground. The ground does a lottery on match days.
Personally it comes down to choice and being in control. I have a online betting account. It's not the newly associated one to Liverpool and I won't be changing to be in support of Liverpool FC's choice. Does that in turn make me a bad supporter?
When I go to a match. If I choose to have a beer in the city and not at Anfield. Am I depriving the club and the sponsors of revenue?
Betting can be a vicious thing. So can drinking. Shall we take that away too?


02 Jul 2016 14:34:50
football is nothing more than a business and business is all about money, sadly morals don't come in to it, the game sold its soul to the devil as soon as the premier league was created, we have gone to far down the road to do anything about it, they have us hooked in and they have no intention of letting us go, hence the fact all sort of companies want a piece of the action, be it betting companies or pay day loan firms, personally Liverpool's sponsors have no affect on me, I didn't drink carlesberg when they sponsored us for example but I do take fellow posters points about betting firms especially with a lot of it being online and as we know gambling addiction is a real problem in society, don't expect the club to reverse this decision because money talks sadly.


02 Jul 2016 16:01:04
If people have a problem and can't bet responsibly (or better yet avoid betting all together) that really isn't the club's problem. In the same way it isn't the club's problem if some fans can't drink responsibly (recent events in France would suggest many can't! )

No one cared when we had a beer sponsoring us.


02 Jul 2016 16:12:28
It's sad, Ed002, especially in countries like Australia. A lot of rugby league teams in Australia have and still do rely on revenue from problem gamblers playing poker machines. How they acquire that revenue is another story - but sad.


02 Jul 2016 05:12:01
Who do you guys think will be the biggest success out of our newest recruits? Personally i see Matip as the one who could stay a long time and make the CB role his own. Grujic is a bit of an unknown quantity, Mane could be phenomenal or a flop and Karius would need to be pretty special to stand out as a keeper. But something in Matip suggests we could possibly have a calm, dominant CB in the mould of Agger.

Believable9 Unbelievable2

02 Jul 2016 06:36:28
To be honest I have high hopes for all and think we have done really well and been quite savvy in the market.

Really looking forward to seeing Mane, Karius and Matip all of whom I think will go straight into the first team.

Grujic and the possible zielinski and chilwell may have to wait a little longer in my opinion.

I'm only unsure about zielinski but that's based on what I've read about him so admittedly I'm not in a position to judge. Fingers crossed!


02 Jul 2016 07:05:42
I remember posting a couple of years ago when we were linked with Papapapadopopopoulopolops from Schalke and watched a few of their games and Matip was the one for me who stood out in every game and remember asking the Eds could we get him instead. The reply? 'not at this time'


02 Jul 2016 07:09:53
Im looking forward to 2018 when we have Dahood and Grujic if things go to plan, I expect Can to be sold for upwards of 50m by then. Juventus are looking to get in cheaper this summer now Pogbas on the way.


02 Jul 2016 09:33:54
Hard to tell, hard to pick just one.
Karius, if he settles quickly will make a huge difference.
Matip, same.
Mane has the potential to transform our attack so again could make a huge difference.

I will pick Karius as the one with the most potential to improve our team so far, but that depends on if he actually gets in the team quickly and does enough to stay there, also depends on how the defence decides to behave this season.

Also the most important signing could very well be a left back, whoever it is, I hope it's the right person, we really really need to strengthen here.


02 Jul 2016 10:35:12
If we get the sync right between Coutinho, Firmino and Mane, I have a feeling that Mane can surprise a lot of people. We saw this with Suarez when he moved up by quite a few steps when the team played around him to his strengths. But I have this eerie feeling that Klopp will play only two of those three at any given time. He'll always have Milner or Lallana in, because he likes defensive abilities as high up the pitch as possible. And consequently, I think Klopp is more willing to let Coutinho or Firmino go, then the rest of us.


02 Jul 2016 14:27:41
I said this earlier before about Mane. He may be trouble like Suarez, but if he clicks, he could easily hit those 20-goal season heights of Suarez too. Let's see how it all plays out.


02 Jul 2016 02:05:44
Hi eds, do u tink klopp is in dilemma if he should keep joe allen? He has good form end of last season and also in euro.

Believable1 Unbelievable4

{Ed001's Note - there is no dilemma, he will be sold if we get a decent offer.}

 
Change Consent