Liverpool Banter Archive December 15 2017

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

15 Dec 2017 16:19:35
Don't know if Paul Merson is back on the sauce but he reckons we are the only team out of the big teams who would take Jack Wilshere is he having a laugh! Oh and he sees vhim as a replacement for Courtinho.

Believable9 Unbelievable1

15 Dec 2017 16:45:09
He has a point, we are the only ones who stockpile midfielders.


15 Dec 2017 16:34:59
Sorry if this is harsh but I don’t see it with him. Not only is he massively injury prone I honestly don’t see this superstar level people keep assigning to him. Wouldn’t be within a mile of a genuine top class midfielder for me.


15 Dec 2017 18:43:22
Jack Wilshere would not make the stands at LFC.


15 Dec 2017 18:44:56
Ron, suddenly your answers and posts have been a bit snippy and harsh lately towards LFC, the players and Klopp. You are normally the eternal optimist on this site. What's your beef, man?


15 Dec 2017 18:45:56
The new joe Cole? Lol.


15 Dec 2017 21:56:46
Sorry lads, I'm massively disillusioned after the team changes for the derby and it will take me a while to get it off my chest.


15 Dec 2017 23:58:28
Ron, what if you had drawn with Coutinho and Firmino?


16 Dec 2017 02:46:28
Come on Ron, what happened that game was pretty annoying to say the least, even worse it was because it was vs Everton but, it's history, there's been worse games, got to get on with it mate and hope we learn from it.


16 Dec 2017 03:29:20
Oh boy, Paul Merson started his Christmas binge early this year.


16 Dec 2017 08:02:21
Setting myself up for a fall here but I think Ron would be fine with playing our best team and not winning. It's not the result that bothers him it's the not taking it seriously that he has a problem with.


16 Dec 2017 08:49:56
Putney, that is pure projection. We know Klopp did not take the game seriously. Cos he has feasted on them since he arrived here (3 wins on the bounce) Cou had a knock and Firmino was too tired and both were not fit to start. You may disagree with that BUT neither you nor I are the manager so we don't know the information Klopp and the fitness team and sports scientists had prior to the game, which determines who plays and for how long.

Had he played them and they got injured, you would be fuming and rightly so for Klopp starting them esp. since the rotation policy of late had yielded 13 points out of 15 and a CL KO ticket prior to that? We played Can and Wiji due to illness and injuries at CB at Brighton and won 5-1. Why change something that is working you would asked, right? Had Mane squared the ball or Salah, Lovren and Gomez taken their chances, people would not be complaining. Then, Klopp plays his best team vs WBA and we were actually closer to beating Everton with a "weaker" team than we did vs WBA with our best team. Wow, I thought footie was an exact science.

Frankly, people need to get over this whole "play your best team" vs Everton stuff as you cannot play your best team if some of them are not fit enough to give 100% in a derby. Klopp put a good team out there and why do we know that? They dominated, created chances and bar a fluke pen, they would have won, like they have been prior to the game. On to B'mouth.


16 Dec 2017 08:52:12
Klopp played the team everyone wanted against West Brom and it was even worse watching Can, Gini and Coutinho stroll around in midfield like they couldn't be bothered. At least Milner, Henderson and Chamberlain worked hard to make things happen against Everton. Football is 90% perspiration and 10% inspiration.

Anyway, that was a week ago now. There are worse things happen in life than drawing a derby game.


16 Dec 2017 09:48:52
Yea drawing agains't West Brom.


16 Dec 2017 10:34:01
BRover, the question was why Ron is upset and he has a legitimate reason. You're talking about a lot of what ifs and maybes. The only fact is that Klopp didn't play our strongest team in the Merseyside derby. You may be okay with Klopp doing that but Ron isn't.

My beef is that playing Solanke was a terrible choice for that game, Klopp played right into Allardyce's hands and it's a concern that Klopp showed such poor judgement.


16 Dec 2017 10:58:07
Putney, I am not referring to Ron's point as he has said that he is upset cos the game was one he and his mates look forward to hence, his disappointment and I can understand that. That is separate from what is actually going on with the team on the pitch, in training, analysis and preparation. What I mentioned regarding the injuries/ tiredness with Cou and Firmino are not what if's. They are facts as Klopp mentioned them. You may choose to ignore all of that cos it does not fit your narrative BUT they are still facts. The team he picked played well enough to win and that is all I care about. All the "best team" is just white noise, IMO.

Regarding Solanke, did Klopp play into the hands of Mark Hughes when he started Solanke and where Solanke had an assist and should have had another one and should have scored in a game we won 3-0? The kid had a good game so what is wrong with Klopp starting him vs Everton coming off the back of a decent showing vs Stoke? Oh and btw, who played Mane thru on goal before he got greedy and fluffed his lines? Solanke.

You think Klopp cares about what the opposition manager thinks and therefore, plans his teams accordingly? He is not that insecure, my friend. Pls, Sam Alardyce is and has always been a clueless manager and you are giving him way too much credit for that. A dead clock is right twice a day does not mean the clock works.


16 Dec 2017 12:35:28
Sam is extremely skilled at what he does. It’s not actual football, it’s something far far uglier but his job is not to earn trophies. It’s to help a club avoid relegation and there is no better manager out there in my mind who can do it. Short term, he has saved a sinking ship but I feel bad for Everton fans who have to endure a dreadful two seasons of his (ahem) brand of football- as bad as they are, nobody deserves that. As for klopp not playing his strongest team, I respect bringing in Solanke but there was no worse game to start. Perhaps klopp was arrogant enough to believe we’d bowl them over with a “weakened” team. It’s disappointing but hopefully he’ll learn and never do it again. I worry more about Ron- we need someone to remind us it’ll all be alright when it’s all going wrong. Perhaps Harry could step in for the moment with a little positivity?


16 Dec 2017 13:05:03
Nice one, AOE. I like your post about Fat Scam BUT I just disagree with the "Klopp is arrogant" stuff. Klopp nor LFC are in no position to be arrogant about anything given the crap we have had to deal with for years and arrogance did not make Klopp destroy the mighty Bayern and win the trophies he has won. He is a very honorable and humble man and I love that about him.

Now, back to your post. Look at Brighton. Had he had his CB's, he would have played them instead of Can and Wiji. Had he had them healthy and STILL played Can and Wiji then for sure, he is arrogant. That was not the case at Brighton nor vs Everton.
Klopp played a team that was missing Cou (knock) and Firmino (fatigue) and were not deemed fit enuff to start. That is not arrogance. That is reality. You may disagree with the lineup BUT those were the cards he was dealt. He put out the best team he had available and had no choice but to start Solanke. The manager plays the players he has available to him based on fitness and energy levels, end of. This is not rocket science as all managers do this cos well, that is the hand they are dealt.

The team was good enuff to win the game and the so called "best team" were poor vs WBA so by that standard, he might as well have played the "weak" team vs WBA as they seemed to actually care while the best team did not look bothered esp. in CM.


16 Dec 2017 16:42:14
Fair enough brover- I should probably state that the word arrogance wasn't meant in a completely negative way- merely confidence in how badly Everton have been- as a manager I think there should be a certain amount of arrogance when making hard decisions. It wasn't a knock on klopp- but playing the team he played was in my view a mistake. These things happen and I hope he learns. I think the frustration for his team selection was in him playing key players for the full 90 against a battered team midweek instead of subbing them for the derby. Again, I hope he learns. I'm very much of the opinion that if they're fit to be on the bench, they're fit to start. I think if you are rotating, it should be two to three players at a time and be clever with substitutions- especially when there's a massive massive game to come.


15 Dec 2017 16:10:10
Eds regarding our new CB options in Jan, does os still seem to be De Vrij or Howedes, has there been any progress with either?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

15 Dec 2017 15:33:56
Eds how good is Donnarumma? Debut for Milan at 16 is extraordinary. Im sure his poisonous agent has a career path mapped out for him already. Hopefuly our own young keeper Grabara is the real deal as he looks very promising.

Believable3 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - excellent young player.}

15 Dec 2017 15:43:22
£50m get him? 😉 thanks for reply mate.


{Ed001's Note - doubt it would enough for him.}

15 Dec 2017 15:50:02
Was going to suggest throwing Migs into the deal too but they would look for £60m then Haha. jokin aside i never understood the reluctance to splash out on a top keeper. its such an important position that can spread confidence throughout a squad and make the difference between a decent season and a sucessful one.


{Ed001's Note - should be the most important buy.}

15 Dec 2017 16:05:19
It’s the difference for Man U for last couple of seasons. I’d spend 50 plus million on bringing in a great young keeper. The likes of Donnarumma would solve our huge Achilles heel for many years to come.


{Ed002's Note - Not going to happen.}

15 Dec 2017 16:02:20
Agreed. thanks for replies and keep up the great work. love this page.


{Ed001's Note - welcome mate.}

15 Dec 2017 16:13:15
Completely agree Peterpan and Ed001. The one position that you can't carry a weak link!


{Ed001's Note - build from the back, it has always been the way to do it.}

15 Dec 2017 16:56:53
Brian Clough knew the score when he brought Peter Shilton in. Two European Cups proved him right. Rafa replaced Dudek after won us the Champipns League. He was a good keeper but Reina was better. No sentiment, just improve a vital position in the team. That is what is needed now.


15 Dec 2017 19:32:07
Do you rate Grabara ed?


{Ed001's Note - not seen enough to judge him, I don't get the time to watch the reserves and youth games any more, sadly.}

15 Dec 2017 19:56:55
How do you rate Karius, Ed 001? I think he improves us greatly, not just in shot stopping abilities but how quick he is to get the ball and move it to our attackers. It seems he has started to learn from his previous mistakes but only further matches will tell.


{Ed001's Note - he hasn't really been tested enough to see what he can do, but a good part of the reason he has not been tested is the confidence he brings to the backline compared to Mignolet. At the very least he is confident, good on the ball and quick to get the ball forward. All of which are things we normally lack and that we need. He is growing on me to be honest.}

15 Dec 2017 22:59:34
You are right, Ed. It is not a coincidence that the defence looks more sure and secure when he plays as he seems to be in charge and very decisive when coming out for a ball on the deck or in the air. This is may explain why he seems to have very little to do whereas when Migs is there and tho he may have nothing to do, he just gives us the jitters while Karius is the complete opposite.

He is confident and sure of himself and the defenders seem to know what he will do. I rate the kid and am sure there is a good GK somewhere in there as he came to us highly rated. I propose we build our own top class GK as the top GK's are all taken and their clubs will NOT sell.


16 Dec 2017 06:02:56
Karius needs to be first choice now. And he should be given time to make the spot his own. He has all the tools to be a Klopp GK but needs the support of the fans.


16 Dec 2017 09:57:19
I agree IB, from what I've seen from Karius this season so far he's impressed me, he deserves his chance but I fear we'll see Migs back in tomorrow which winds me up, fingers crossed its Karius.


16 Dec 2017 10:35:44
Whether Karius becomes first choice or not is not down to the fans. It's about whether Klopp trusts him and whether he does the business on the pitch.


16 Dec 2017 11:04:27
Putney, I fully agree. However, Klopp has intimated (via Ed01's info) that he is hesitant to put Karius back in long term cos he is scared the fans will get on his back as soon as he makes a mistake (as if no GK in history has ever made one before him) like they shamelessly did last season to the point of nearly destroying his fledgling LFC career. We cannot ignore that as that threatened to destroy our season as a whole.

So in some way, it is down to the "fans" tho I agree that Klopp should put him in and tell such fans to get over themselves cos the others like myself will support him. Afterall, I did not want Ox here YET he has my full support.


16 Dec 2017 13:21:12
BRover - Well said, there are some true fans after all.


16 Dec 2017 18:40:44
"Klopp has intimated (via Ed01's info) that he is hesitant to put Karius back in long term cos he is scared the fans will get on his back as soon as he makes a mistake"

Seriously? A manager who picks his team based on fear of fans reaction?

It's a shame he didn't take that into account last week.


15 Dec 2017 13:12:26
Quick question for Ed002.

Lots of talk on the radio today saying that we will be back in for VVD in Jan, with City also looking. Ed 001 mentioned that we probably won't, now I trust Ed001 over some of these presenters all day long.

Have Liverpool made any attempts to reastablish their business relationship with Southampton? There have been quite a few transactions between the two clubs so just wondered what the situation is.

Cheers.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I am not aware of Liverpool speaking to Southampton at all since they apologised for the illegal approach and meeting with Klopp and they withdrew all interest in Van Dijk. The complaint still sits on file.}

15 Dec 2017 13:48:53
Ok.
Thanks Ed002.


15 Dec 2017 13:57:47
I heard a solid rumour that VVD was definitely going to Citeh in Jan - deal already done.


{Ed002's Note - There is no "deal done", but he is on their lengthy list of CBs that I shared.}

15 Dec 2017 16:30:48
What KLOPP has to watch out for is the season doesn’t fall flat by the end of February, can’t afford to be making changes in the F. A. CUP game against EVERTON.
To me KLOPP looks as if he has taking his eye off the ball in the league, and is putting all his eggs in one basket in the CHAMPIONS LEAGUE, one bad half against PORTO and the questions will really be getting asked. and no I am not anti-KLOPP, I think he’s been a breath of fresh to the club but at this moment as we stand it doesn’t look as if we’ve progressed much apart from changing RODGERS front 3 for his own front 3.


15 Dec 2017 16:36:18
Having seen his performance against Leicester good luck to City with him.


15 Dec 2017 17:48:58
Just wondering if there’s a secret code in you message with the random use of capitals wembley78?


15 Dec 2017 23:07:08
Why the all caps, wembley. We know who Klopp is and so no need to highlight him. Now onto your post, I disagree with the fact that he is putting all his eggs in one basket. That is strange as the season is not even half way yet and we are 4 points off 3rd and in the CL KO stages (something BR failed at) . Klopp takes one game at a time and that is the way it should be. You're reading too much into things, I'm afraid.

Also, comparing him to BR is just wrong. Klopp has taken us forward from the mess we were in with BR as I don't have a short memory. Now if you think he has not cos he has not won a trophy or the PL fast enough for you yet then that is your opinion.

However, he got to two finals including a European final with BR's own players. If that is not improvement in itself then I don't know what is. Also, we are a MUCH better team than when BR left and even a much better team than last season depth wise. In the CL and in the KO stages where anything can happen. Did BR do that? We still need to improve as this team is not yet the finished article.


16 Dec 2017 10:13:15
Vvd isn't interested in playing at Southampton hence his very average performances lately. I would take him every day of the week over loveren as the bloke is a liability at the back.


16 Dec 2017 13:49:37
BRover the table doesn’t lie, the reason we are in this situation is because of KLOPP we’re throwing points away left right and centre and we keep making the same mistakes time after time, and as for KLOPP’S quotes yesterday, he wants to be the best of the rest, what is that all about.


15 Dec 2017 13:19:14
Ben Woodburn left out of Under 23 squad for the game today.

Don't think he is injured, maybe we'll finally see him back in the first team squad on Sunday?

Fingers crossed!

Believable13 Unbelievable0

15 Dec 2017 17:49:16
Let’s hope so.


15 Dec 2017 12:01:41
Ed, as we are very close to midway through the season is there any chance of a mid term review. How we’ve done so far, comparison to last year, what needs to be improved to get into 2nd or 3rd and maybe a grading or similar for players and manager.
Cheers mate.

Believable0 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - I only did one a few weeks back mate, during the last international break, not sure there is enough changed to make it worthwhile, plus the sites are a bit busy with the January window approaching. I am struggling to keep up with match previews at the moment and my parents are coming to stay for Xmas and New Year in a few days. So I will have to say I won't be able to for now sorry. Maybe MKS would like to do something in this regard?}

15 Dec 2017 13:04:15
I don't mind that Ed001. I'll do one for Christmas Eve McGoveb, if you are interested?


{Ed001's Note - cheers MKS that would be great mate.}

15 Dec 2017 13:06:43
Do you want me to write something Ed01, unbiased, brutally honest 😄😄😄.


{Ed001's Note - if you were capable of doing unbiased then I would love you to write something. Sadly you are just about the most biased person I have ever known, you only ever see what you want to see.}

15 Dec 2017 14:10:30
Ouch!


15 Dec 2017 14:16:23
Ed, my apologies I seem to have missed that review, I’ll start searching to find it, thanks mate. Tough times ahead for you, hope it all runs smoothly. Maybe you can do a Family review for us when they’ve left 😂.

MKs and a Harry, that would be great and very interesting to read your varying reviews of the first half of the season, I for one would be delighted if you could both add your inputs and many thanks for taking the time lads.


{Ed001's Note - I will probably be too busy huddled in a corner, hugging my knees and sobbing uncontrollably by the time they leave for anything else!}

15 Dec 2017 14:30:32
yes i would totally love to read Mks and Harrys views.
Ron K can you write something for us too, lately i see a totally different Ron and im very curious to know why. feels like you are loosing hope? sorry Ron if i got that wrong.


15 Dec 2017 14:38:33
No problem Ed. I am not a good writer anyways. My English is not good to write a long essay.
Cheers.


{Ed001's Note - Harry I was kidding mate. You said about unbiased. No one actually expects you to be unbiased, nor would they want to read you try to be, so don't worry. If you do decide to write something, be yourself.}

15 Dec 2017 14:50:41
I can't get over the derby disappointment crazyhorse.

I've never known us play a weakened team for the derby. It'll take a while for me to get over it.


15 Dec 2017 15:29:19
half season review: 18pts off first.
review ended.


15 Dec 2017 16:08:35
Ron, I’ve noticed ok that you really feel let down by that. It’s so strange to see you like this, hopefully we get some good results and you can get back to your upbeat self.


15 Dec 2017 16:20:23
True armendn, but this is not a normal season to be fair. The Arsenal invincibles had 39 points after 17 games. The Chelsea team which holds record points haul over a season had 40.

In those two seasons we'd be 8 points and 9 points off top spot which is bad, but half of the total gap of this year. Prior to this season, those were the two best teams in an individual premier league season. City are just blowing records apart this year. So whilst we may be 18 points behind them, we are only 7 points off second place Man Utd who in any normal year would probably be the pace setters.

You can't really judge anyone against City this season. They've only drawn one game. We'd have to have won 17/ 17 to be ahead of them! You just have to admire it because they are on course to become the best side in English football history. Would you put it past them winning the treble? I wouldn't.


15 Dec 2017 17:11:33
I'm quiet optimistic adam, was a bit sarcasm behind my "review".
we have a good team, is our mentality that is lacking us. but that takes time to change. we are turning defeats into draws and some draws into wins.


15 Dec 2017 18:06:33
Id be chuffed to bits if Harry and mks do a review. I think this needs to be done even to get two contrasting views on our season.
If you get the time guys I'd be grateful.


15 Dec 2017 18:57:16
Cmon Negative, My review will bring this site down 😄😄. Writing is a skill and I am not good at it mate. I can just post a view. I don’t know why he thinks I am biased. I wish if I was one! I would be right up in the best posters list. I would have had only one username all these years!


{Ed001's Note - I did not say what you are biased towards Harry, I certainly would not say you were biased towards Liverpool or any of its players, unless they are s***ouses who let the club down by trying to force their way out or acting up in other ways. Then you support them rather than the club, which is where your support should lie.}

15 Dec 2017 23:08:00
I see what you did there, Ed.


16 Dec 2017 02:25:58
Please don't forget to mention that we have fewer points than this time last year. Also scored fewer goals even with the so called fab 4. In other words, as my old teacher used to tell me. Must do better.


16 Dec 2017 11:07:41
More no, we can always do better even if we were doing better than last season at the same stage.


15 Dec 2017 10:39:04
Discussion point.

Does anybody else think Solanke and Origi would work as a 2 man strike partnership? Both are very young, technically good, powerful, direct, but both also look better with a strike partner.

Could be a real battering ram option for next season.

Believable3 Unbelievable9

{Ed002's Note - You think Origi will be back then?}

15 Dec 2017 10:56:18
Yeah, they'd be great together.

For West Ham.


15 Dec 2017 11:24:15
Bit harsh Ron? Origi was excellent at times.


15 Dec 2017 11:21:16
I'm not sure Ed002, it was just a point for discussion to be honest. I think there will be a lot of teams willing to offer him first team football. He is a decent striker and people forget how young he is. It would be a shame for us to lose him. Especially as Sturridge, Ings and Brewster will all probably leave, as he might get more chances then. He's doing well in Germany though. He got nominated for rookie player of the month last week, so i expect Wolfsburg will want to make it a permanent deal.

Ron, i think that's a bit harsh. Solanke got nominated for the European Golden boy award and fired England u20's to a victory at a World Cup. Origi has already scored for us and Belgium in massive games. Has your account been hacked? You're a savage nowadays 😂 I'm not suggesting they're ready to be first choice, but if a team was sitting deep and stifling Salah, Firmino and Mane it would be great to throw Origi and Solanke on for half an hour to cause havoc. They're both powerful and direct.


{Ed002's Note - Wolfsburg will want to keep him and he wants to stay in Germany. I doubt he has any future under Klopp.}

15 Dec 2017 11:41:36
Origi and Solanke have great potential, I just can't see them working together personally but would be interesting to see it. How is Origi's loan spell doing?


15 Dec 2017 12:11:09
Personally I think Ings is more suited to our play than Origi and should be ahead of solanke as he’s proven although hopefully solanke fulfills his potential.


15 Dec 2017 12:41:02
I don't disagree with that to be fair Pegleg. Though i think Solanke is a better prospect, Ings is the better player currently based on what I've seen from him in the u23's.

I think Ings and Sturridge will leave though, maybe as soon as January. At their age, they should be playing regular football and that just won't happen for us.

I think it'll be up to Origi and Ed002 has now told us he wants to stay in Germany so i expect that will happen. To answer the question, Origi has been impressing steadily in Germany. They are a country who know how to nurture young talent as well so it would be a good career move for him.

If we lose Sturridge (West Ham? ), Ings (Newcastle? ) Origi (Wolfsburg? ) and Brewster (Dortmund? ) in the summer/ January then i think we might cause ourselves problems. Although they're not regulars, we'd need to replace them with at least one player for squad depth. Firmino, Solanke, Salah, Woodburn, Mane and Chamberlain looks a little bit light to me. We'd forever be one injury away from a crisis. Perhaps Wilson or Ojo could step up though to be fair.


15 Dec 2017 12:44:00
I’d rather see Solanke play with someone like Firmino or Salah - someone who can feed off his hold up play, has clever movement and also pull into the wide areas as required.


15 Dec 2017 13:02:16
I'd love to see him playing regularly alongside Firmino, Mane and Salah to be fair Grobs24. Coutinho isn't exactly trying right now so he has games where he just can't be bothered, like West Brom. Solanke will put in a shift in every game though. He's not as good, but at least we won't have players relying on a Coutinho who only shows up when he feels like it!


15 Dec 2017 13:10:45
Grobs24, with Ings he’s the closest player to firmino with his work ethic although he’s not at the same skill level. But but where Ings will make up for it he has an eye for goal which is the only thing lacking from firmino’s game. For me if I was rotating firmino with anyone it would be Ings as from what I’ve seen of him, and I watched him at Burnley he’d fit in if he can stay fit.


15 Dec 2017 14:00:38
It's all about expectations MKS. A front 2 of Origi and Solanke next season is not going to help us challenge Man City for the title.

We need to upgrade our first team, not stick some 20yr olds with potential in.


15 Dec 2017 13:52:05
The only player ever to score a hattrick without trying?


15 Dec 2017 14:13:01
I'm with MK I really like Origi, scored some impressive goals (remember the 2 against Dortmund) he has good qualities, pace, good finishing, shame to see him go, hope he does well.


15 Dec 2017 14:34:29
I see your point Ron. However, Messi, Owen, Fowler, Jesus, Rashford and Kane all got their chances at 18-21 years old and never looked back. As others have pointed out, Origi has already scored big European goals for us, a hat trick, a Derby goal, and even a world cup goal for Belgium. He's not as bad as you are suggesting. Solanke was nominated in the top 25 kids in Europe according to the Golden Boy award shortlist so he can't be a bad player either!

Plus I never suggested they be first choice. Just an alternative "option" to the complicated and intricate play which doesn't seem to work every time against banked up defences.


15 Dec 2017 14:54:01
Ok, well I'll repeat, if we're using them in the first team together we are not going to be challenging for the league.

Apart from Messi, how many of the players you mention have been contributing to title winning teams as youngsters? Jesus at a stretch.


15 Dec 2017 15:13:16
At this point I'd love the kids to be given a couple years to develop as a team In the hope that we'd improve season on season, not to mention our finances would start improving. That said, it would simply never happen for many many reasons but throwing money at our deficiencies hasn't brought us great success.


15 Dec 2017 15:13:45
Jesus at a stretch? How very Christmassy of you.


15 Dec 2017 16:29:58
Whilst you are correct that none of them played in title winning teams, I'm not sure you can pin the lack of success on them. Fowler scored 36 goals at 19 years of age. We didn't win the league with him because the other 10 players weren't good enough. It was nothing to do with Fowlers age.

I think you're being close minded about this. Age is irrelevant. If you're good enough, you're old enough. You keep banging on about Derby games. Well City won the Manchester Derby with Sterling, Jesus and Sane starting up front. They are 22, 19 and 21.

Dortmund took the league title off of Bayern Munich with a 22 year old Lewandowski supported by an 18 year old Gotze as well.

Age really is irrelevant mate. If we don't give Solanke a fair chance, we'll just ruin his career and have wasted our chance at developing a top talent who could potentially lead our line for a decade. Solanke and Gomez are the best u21 players I've seen at Liverpool in my life time. I will be infuriated if we waste their talent because we're impatient or scared to give them a chance.


15 Dec 2017 17:57:34
Very well said MK - sometimes you need to give special young talent the opportunity to settle, not just a game here and there. It’s painful in the short term as they’ll be inconsistent but you’ll reap the rewards later once they are integrated and the confidence is up.

I think Solanke and Woodburn are two of these, just like Gomez was a few months ago and now our best defender. Brewster may well be another in time.


15 Dec 2017 22:02:52
MKS : they are not good enough, that's the point.

They are good enough at a certain level but they are not at the level we need to progress - yet.

If you think they are then ask yourself if you think Real Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern, Man City, PSG would sign them?
Solanke has been let go by Chelsea ( KdB, Lukaku and Salah were sold, not let go) and Origi is missing open goals from 1 yard out.


15 Dec 2017 23:15:59
Ron, football esp. with youth does not work that way as it is not an exact science. If you think the kid is the real deal, then you have to play him and give him time to progress as inconsistency is part of the learning process. We are doing the exact thing with Gomez and TAA and they are improving w/ every passing day. Whether they would make it at RM, Barcelona or whatever is irrelevant, IMO.

We will never know if they are good enough until you actually play them. Saying they are not good enough cos they are young and inconsistent, is wrong and slating Origi (I watch Origi a lot in Germany and I have not seen him do that this season and he has scored 5 goals already) and Solanke (who many were happy with at first BUT are now getting on his back) does not help either. If you don't allow a young player time to settle and improve, you don't deserve the player you want him to become, plain and simple.


16 Dec 2017 03:01:53
Mk you need to look at this a different way mate! . Yes big Dom might be rated this and that but understand that is against other kids it's a whole different story when your playing with men pal.
Up to now solanke has done nothing when playing against men, imo mate ron is right you need to stop bringing his daft accolades up ad the really are pointless mate.
This has surprised me as you tend to write good stuff and your points of view are usually bang on but this well the less said the better unfortunately bud.


16 Dec 2017 09:55:56
It was against RB Leipzig BRover.

It's on the BBC website under the title
"Origi's embarrassing miss for Wolfsburg"


16 Dec 2017 10:08:10
We need to look at why we are so inconsistent and what other teams are doing better than we are.
Are City developing young players in their first team?
Are Chelsea developing young players in their first team?

If you want to continue, as we are, as Spurs and Arsenal are, then by all means do it.
If you want to win things, you have to look to improve. You have to sign players to improve the first team.
Continuously "developing" young players in the first team is something we've done for the last 25 years with no success in the league and with continuing lack of consistency. It's no coincidence.


16 Dec 2017 11:17:34
Ok Ron, I stand corrected as I did not watch that game (I know I missed something) . Strikers miss open goals all the time even the best ones, so not to bothered with that esp. with a young player still learning the CF position which is hardest to learn as a youth player. We are already better than City and Chelsea in developing young players into the first team. We are now progressing towards making them mainstays in the team and that is the next step.

Signing players to improve the first team is what every team/ manager tries to do so preaching to the choir on that one. As it stand, we are in the Spurs and Arsenal category as we will NEVER be spending 300m every season like City do or 200m every season like Utd do. Those are the facts and if anyone has issues with that then yeah, they are supporting the wrong club. We are doing a Spurs right now and they seem to be improving every season since Poch was there. Klopp and the owners are trying to do the same here and there will be bumps on the road. You keep the faith and believe in what you are trying to do. That is the reality.


16 Dec 2017 12:12:39
The reality is Spurs, like us, have gone over 2 and a half decades without winning the league.
What have Spurs won by developing players in the first team?
What have City and Chelsea won by not developing young players IN THE FIRST TEAM - a lot!

Chelsea and City have realised that if you develop players by playing them in the first team you will not win anything.
Last player we successfully developed in our first team was Sterling. What happened there? He went to City when we'd finished "developing him" and won loads.
A team that develops young players in the first team is a "stepping stone" club. That's why we've got Solanke.


14 Dec 2017 11:22:20
if one of (or both, be interesting to get as many opinions as possible) the Ed's are about, I would like to ask a question. Why is it, in your opinion, that Man City can break down defensive teams so well? The rest of the 'top' teams, have all succumbed to teams sitting deep and playing for a draw. It surely cannot just be because they have better players can it? Both Chelsea and LFC have some incredibly creative attackers but we seem to stumble a lot more. Is it down to tactics or belief? If so, what is different and if it is because of players, who and why?
Just curious to get your analysis and thought it would for an interesting topic. Thanks.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed0333's Note - I think it’s because Man City attack you from all angles and are relentless. They have forged a reputation of being able to score at any moment. I think some of its psychological and most opposition think they are going to lose before they step onto the pitch. Also there’s the Pep factor. In my opinion hes carved a formidable reputation with what he’s achieved before and truth be told they have some fabulous football players in their squad. Furthermore I’ve not seen anyone really go for the jugular against them allowing them to rampage. Great question tho mate and I’d be interested in what others thought on the matter.

15 Dec 2017 05:58:29
Quality and nothing else. In KDB and Silva they have the very best playmakers in the league! They have a fantastic front line who could score in abundance.
City’s main strength comes from their full backs. They offer so much going forward. Pep has taken them to another level and it is clearly seen. People who called him crap are eating their words now!


{Ed001's Note - again another of your fantasies. No one has called Pep crap, what they have said is that he only manages to win when he has by far and away the best players. As is being proven again, he is winning due to the quality of the players at his disposal rather than the quality of his management. Half a billion spent is why they are winning, not Pep Guardiola. It is the money which has taken them to another level.}

15 Dec 2017 06:45:37
I think they have an excellent front three but then so do we. it’s because they have an incredible midfield and the fullbacks that everyone’s especially terrified of City IMO. De Bruyne, Silva can really hurt you, and together with decent delivery from out wide they have the capacity to unlock teams in multiple ways. Once you’re a goal down against them it’s incredibly hard.

That’s where we lack that killer touch in having Gini, Milner (and Coutinho a bit hit and miss) at the moment. Even our fullbacks have been a bit lacking in terms of quality of delivery, especially with Moreno out now. TAA made a good few chances vs. Westbrom, was just unlucky it didn’t stick.


15 Dec 2017 06:24:36
To be fair ed city have always had the money, Pep's taken them to level above what any of their previous managers could.


{Ed001's Note - and done so by spending more money than previous managers, a lot more.}

15 Dec 2017 07:10:57
Money could also give you a couple of Andy carroll’s, Charlie Adam’s and Christian Benteke’a. Money doesn’t alone win you title. UTD has been spending insane amount since earth was formed.
People called him the fake messaih. Turning out to be the only messiah in the league!
When City wins it’s all about money! When Leicester wins it’s about Squad!
Sorry not for any argument. Just saying!


15 Dec 2017 07:21:33
Simple mate! We are built as counter pressing team. Once opposition parks the bus and gives us all possession we tend to struggle coz our attacking players have no space to run at opposition defenders.


15 Dec 2017 07:57:37
Nailed it koptie 7. That’s the shortest way to describe our strength and weakness in one small para! No space, we pass sideways and backwards!


15 Dec 2017 08:14:39
Yes City have spent money, just like United do and have done do over the years.

City play, quick, direct and incisive football, attacking teams not just through the middle but with width too, it’s as simple as that. All we can do is pass the ball sidewards against teams that sit deep. When we played WBA on weds night, after 10mins, I said to the bloke I sit next to at the match, this will end up a draw. I think we are far too predicable at times and we don’t have the ability to change the game through different tactics.

What City and Peo have done is address areas off the team that were weak un like us. Of course they still look a bit suspect at the back but they are more defensively sound than last season, their keeper in particular shows this. They’ve spent a lot but spent well in my opinion.

I think Pep has the team playing his way now and this really shows on the pitch in my opinion. At the moment, they also have a winning mentality and relentlessness to go and win the game.

I really enjoy watching City play, especially when you compare them to Mourhino’s dross.


15 Dec 2017 09:06:03
I don’t think it’s all to do with money. you have to give some credit to pep for the way he’s making them play.


15 Dec 2017 08:30:26
his team's always seem to be very well structured too. at least until the attacking third where they have license to thrill. I think that solid base aligned with having topquality players in the attacking third is a perfect blend for any league and especially in the premier league.


15 Dec 2017 08:53:19
Some interesting points there, some different ones too. I find Ed0333's point a good one, saying no team has really gone at City, i think you may be right about teams being beaten before the game has even started. I think the next LFC v MC game should be intriguing as i can't see Klopp sitting back.


15 Dec 2017 09:10:14
Agree pep has city playing lovely football and its great to watch. But as ed pointed out he has spent a hell of a lot of money in doing so. one of citys full backs costs the same as liverpools back 5.


15 Dec 2017 09:36:12
Harry, the players you cited a la Charlie Adam and Carroll etc highlights the exact point your arguing against. City can afford to buy not only the best players in the world, but several of them in one window if they wished to. If Liverpool take an expensive punt on a Carrol it costs us big time. City spent £100m on their full backs in the summer plus a sizeable amount on Danilo and I read this morning he might be in for a left back in jan with Mendy being out (I appreciate that might be paper talk) .

They bought silva from Monaco who barely gets a start. No one is saying Pep is crap but I do think people can pose a justifiable question. could he do it at Porto or Dortmund for example. If he was Liverpool manager and Klopp the city manager would we be top of the league?


15 Dec 2017 09:29:11
Take out their main 2 :KVD and Silva and they will be like arsenal.


15 Dec 2017 09:42:31
If you have an owner giving a manager like Pep (already a great manager) half a billion (and counting) in the past two seasons, it is only normal and expected that the team will perform. Ed01 is correct, City is outspending everyone by a near 2 or even 3 to 1 margin if you are LFC and Spurs, so it is only normal that they are where they are as half a billion does GETS you the quality they have. If they win the PL, it is expected. If they don't win the CL after outspending everyone in Europe (even PSG) hen questions will be asked of Pep, for sure. It's that simple.


15 Dec 2017 09:47:42
Kopite7, I don't believe that. We have scored more goals, won more games and created more chances vs these low block teams this season than we did last season at the same point so that part has been fixed. This is cos we are 100% focused mentally and don't let up when we attack them and probe them and thanks to Salah, we are doing much better.

However, the issue is that we seem to be standing in our own way due to defensive errors, lack of composure in front of goal and a like WBA, lack of movement. We are the ones in our own way as we are not converting as much as we should cos tho we did not play well vs WBA, we still carved out 4 clear chances to score. That was not happening last season and frankly, we'd have lost such games last season which we are not doing now. The low block is no longer an issue, IMO. It all depends on us.


15 Dec 2017 10:03:27
Regardless of what money he’s spent pep has had what three transfer windows to fix what problems city had compared Klopps 5? And we’re still miles away for challenging the title. We’ve still got the same problem goal keeper and after buying bargain basement defenders still have defensive issues. Now I like klopp but if you can’t see how every other team seems to change managers and make it work you’ve either got blinkers on or you’re a fool! Mourinho has turned Man U around although they still have work to do but look a completely different outfit to before his reign, Conte one the league in his first season and will get champions league this season.


15 Dec 2017 10:11:27
Totally agree with the Ed. Pep clearly is very good. But as you say he's had to buy big on top of the already goid/ expensive squad he had and to an extent struggled at times with last season. Thus needing to go spend £200+ in the summer rather than improve players he already had. Also not youngsters have come through as yet and city have spent fortune in this front and have some really good young players but are they going to get a chance when buying in 3,4 £50m players each summer?


15 Dec 2017 10:17:44
To be fair United has spent just as much, if not more than City in recent years. Mourinho has a squad worth £750m, and he can't even come to Anfield and play for a win? It's embarrassing.

Pep Guardiola might only be able to win when he has the best resources, but at least he does it playing attractive football! His City team (regardless of whether it is good management or monies spent behind it) are changing English football. It used to be a case of win your home games, beat the lesser teams, take draws from your rivals, only lose 2-3 games, and you'll win the league. City have raised the bar. They've dropped 2 points in 17 games and they're on course to finish on around 110 points if they sustain this form. The Arsenal invincibles had 10 less points than City after 17 games. It's ridiculous.


15 Dec 2017 10:42:56
Spot on MK regarding United. I listen to lots of their fans having a pop at City for their spending. Let’s not forget they’ve been doing it for years. Way back buying Pallister for a record signing, Further forward Rio for £30m in 2002.

I hate how money has changed the game.


15 Dec 2017 10:50:07
Don't remember City leaving their quality players on the bench for the derby.


15 Dec 2017 11:31:21
Except Sergio Aguero?


15 Dec 2017 11:01:12
On to B'Mouth, Ron.


15 Dec 2017 14:18:46
I said the same as ED, he needs money and the best players, but my friend pointed out that even though he had Messi, no one since has had the same level of success with Messi as Pep has had with Messi so that must count for something.


{Ed001's Note - who have they had since? Luis Enrique was a madman who was a joke before Barca but still won things there because of Messi. I can't even remember the rest, but the club was left in turmoil by over spending by presidents.}

15 Dec 2017 14:47:25
Man City have much more movement up front, and they play the killer pass much more too,
yes, they have spent big, and they should win the Premiership with ease,
Man Utd have been spending big for years, but they won't get near City this season or the next .


{Ed001's Note - Utd have spent 2nd most and are sat 2nd.}

15 Dec 2017 15:10:35
It's not going to happen BRover

The home derby is THE biggest recurring game of the season for me and most of my mates.


15 Dec 2017 15:43:04
Pep may very well be a decent manager, but never seen him manage a mediocre team. As ED001 eluded to, spend spend spend, win win win, manager of the year? I don't think so. I'd love to see him manage a team with a low budget and see exactly what kind of manager he is.


15 Dec 2017 18:56:23
Ron, I understand your pain for sure, man. For me, I'm over Everton and frankly, not bothered with them and never have. I see them now as a team we have to play to get 3 points cos like it or not, we have bigger fish to fry than the likes of Everton who are going nowhere fast. They have only beaten us 4 times since 1999 n no wins at Anfield. Nuff said!

Beating them for me now, is like beating a team for 3 points and nothing more. Why? I would be pissed off if we beat Everton and miss the CL. Would you want that? I would not. I respect every opponent and understand why you are down BUT take heart in the fact that we are improving and we are now back amongst the contenders for the CL. Beating Everton is only part of the journey and NOT the be all, end all IMO.

You got to look at the picture at times and btw, I disagree that we put out a weak team as we played a team that was fit enough to play as we needed fresh legs to go at them. Had they battered us then you would be correct. They did not and save for a dodgy pen and missed chances, this "weak" team would have won. That just shows how hapless their team actually is and have made my point for me. Take heart my friend.


15 Dec 2017 22:06:26
Derby matches are the biggest games for me.

Always have been, always will be. Play your strongest team against your neighbours - no exceptions.


15 Dec 2017 23:18:39
Well, if your players are carrying injuries, you play the best team available to you. Managers do that all the time so you may have to get over that, derby or not.


16 Dec 2017 12:46:35
If you're injured, you miss the game and usually subsequent games.
You don't come on after 70 minutes, when the plan has gone tits up, to try and rescue something. You also don't usually start the next game.

Injuries, knocks etc are part of the game. I doubt there's one player who has never started a game with a knock.
Klopp gambled on the most important game of the season for many fans. If he doesn't know that, then he's not the man I thought he was. Worse still he won't admit it.


15 Dec 2017 00:26:26
Ed1 a question if I may? As a Liverpool fan do you think we have had more than our fair share of bad luck and poor refereeing decisions this season? Apart from Migs not seeing red against Stoke it seems every big decision has gone against us starting with 2 offside goals against Watford in the opening day. We’ve had Mane sent off with 50% of people saying he shouldn’t but it went against us. Vardy’s Dive that led to a goal, Juanma fluking one of his knee, Willian fuming one into the top corner, Everton getting a penalty when their player jumps into Lovren, now Solanke’s ‘handball’. We even somehow had a penalty given against us at Brighton although it made no difference in the end.
I know you could give arguments that all of those are correct decisions but I think they could all have gone a different way on a different day with a different ref but this season they are all going against us.
99 times out of 100 Juanma’s goes out for a goal kick, Willian’s sails over the bar, De Gea’s inspector gadget leg doesn’t get to Matip’s shot.
I just feel that aside from City and Spurs the margins have been so tight and the big moments seem to have gone against us and it could’ve been so different had we just either got the luck or the decision in some of those games. Even the City game had Mane got a yellow we could still have won that game.
I don’t want to sound like I’m whinging, I’m not I actually normally think it evens itself out but this season it seems like we’ve run over a black cat or something.
What are you thoughts on it?

Believable3 Unbelievable3

{Ed001's Note - naw I think we have been fairly lucky ourselves with some of the way the balls have bobbled through to our players etc. We just need to be better.}

15 Dec 2017 05:00:48
Agree Ed - we’ve had some good luck, some bad, leave the commentary around luck and refereeing decisions to Mourinho. Man City certainly isn’t complaining.

As Gary Player said, the harder I train, the luckier I get.


{Ed001's Note - exactly mate, if the players have a problem they should work harder, not moan.}

15 Dec 2017 10:37:21
Spot on Grob and Ed. We just have to be better and keep working hard. Nothing is lost and had we won both games of late, nothing would have been sealed. Oh n btw, you can add Wenger to that list.


14 Dec 2017 20:00:05
Ed1, I have a few enquiries if you don't mind?

Why does Klopp insist on backing Mignolet when he should clearly be 2nd (if not 3rd) choice. Can Klopp not see it?

Where is Lallana?

Also, do you see Ox replacing Gini soon? He's been missing quite a bit recently (a ghost, like you said) .

Believable0 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - what else do you want Klopp to do? Publicly slag off one of his own players, so ensuring no player ever wants to work with him again?

Lallana has just come back from a long term injury and is nowhere near match fitness.

Personally I do not see Ox as a central midfielder.}

15 Dec 2017 03:59:25
OHKay! This might be provocative!

Klopp need not say anything but just pick Karius. He just need balls to do it. None would utter a word to him of his choice. He is the manager and he can play anyone he wish to!

Lallana might take a bit more time to come back and that is perfectly ok! We don’t miss him at all! Where would he play anyway?

AOC might regret his move to Liverpool by next summer if he doesn’t cement a place at Center mid ( for which he refused to stay at Arsenal ) He was never a CM, so that part is fine to me.


15 Dec 2017 08:56:30
Harry, all your posts are provocative.

Ed1, I don't think he should slag him off but couldn't he quietly make the change and let Karius keep his place? We seem better for having him in goal in my opinion but the way Klopp speaks about Mignolet being number 1 is like he can't fathom the idea of Karius being first choice.

Do you think Lallana played too many minutes when he played recently (against Chelsea I think)?

Thanks mate, sorry for not explaining my first post in enough detail.


{Ed001's Note - Karius is being phased in gradually, Migs is on his way out.

Lallana just needs time to regain full fitness. It was a long lay off he had and it can be a slow process.}

15 Dec 2017 10:42:06
Harry, Ed01 has said at the time, that Klopp wants Karius back in (correct me Ed01 if I'm wrong) BUT is afraid that should he make a mistake (which is part of the process) the same set of fans who turned on him last season, would turn on him again. I can understand that tho I disagree.

He should never had dropped Karius at the time BUT I can understand why he did so. We just have to trust that Klopp will do the right thing as I know he will if Migs starts his Migs' moments.

As for Ox, he is no CM and never was so if he regrets his decision then that is his problem. Not just any Tom, Dick and Harry can play in our system esp. the way Klopp wants us to play in CM.


15 Dec 2017 12:43:39
Your last para is spot on Brover. It’s truly his mistake and he would realize it soon! £40 mill apparently!


15 Dec 2017 18:59:08
Harry, I was not referring to Klopp BUT to Ox. Either way, I did not want Ox here either BUT I will support him cos he is an LFC player and frankly, I've seen flashes of a good player in him at times BUT a lot more work is needed. Maybe you should try to support our boys cos they wear our shirt and leave whatever happened pre-transfer in the past.


14 Dec 2017 19:09:10
Ed001, do you think there's anything being done or said to Coutinho behind closed doors from Klopp etc at the club RE his work rate?

Its appalling, and if I were one of his teammates (particularly Bobby as he's having to work for both of them) I'd be furious.

He needs to be dropped and at least made to earn his place in the team.

Believable0 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - there will be things said about it, but there is not a lot you can do when a player's heart is not in it.}

 
Change Consent