Liverpool Rumours Member Posts


Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

(single word yields best result)

Donation page to our Charity Match between our site posters

Wavy123's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



Wavy123's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Wavy123's Posts



To Wavy123's last 5 banter posts


To Wavy123's last 5 rumour replies


To Wavy123's last 5 banter replies


Wavy123 has no Rumours Posts



Wavy123's banter posts with other poster's replies to Wavy123's banter posts


02 Aug 2017 14:02:37
I think we have a solid squad and a team who can rival anyone in the premier league. Fans are getting far too over excited about signings and transfers, but the truth is, we already have a squad capable of challenging. Yes people would like keita, but where would he play really? The only other signing I think we need is perhaps a central defender. VVD of otherwise. Save for that, we should look at what others around us are spending and on what. Would you want matic and lukaku over firmino and Henderson? Would you want bernardo silva over coutinho? Lacazette or Moreno over Sturridge and solanke? Not for me. We have a talented close knit squad and have added real quality in salah. We don't need any more without selling. Have faith. This will be a ten beat anyone on their day.




01 Sep 2016 19:03:45
It's always interesting to see where the players that leave your club each transfer window actually go. I would suggest that none of the players that have left Liverpool this summer have gone to bigger or better clubs. That must be telling us all that they were not needed here and not necessarily good enough for the elite. That should be reassuring to all fans surely. No Suarez to Barcelona or Sterling to MCFC this time around. Let's kick on.


1.) 01 Sep 2016 19:26:27
It also shows that although the window was by no means perfect it was a step in the right direction, we got rid of those who weren't good enough and replaced them with players who had ambitions of going where we want to go (champions league and beyond) and are the required quality.

2.) 01 Sep 2016 20:27:35
Is it not a concern?
That despite not having CL football, or in fact any European football, no clubs wanted any of our players as they wouldn't make a difference to their squads?

We have, I agree, binned off those not good enough for our first team.

3.) 01 Sep 2016 22:58:41
Wavy, I agree it's positive that we have moved on a significant number of players that weren't adding to our 1st team. By the same token it shows a) how poor our judgement has been in previous windows (Benteke, Balotelli) and b) we haven'the been great at development (Yesil, Markovic, etc al) . Let's hope that we are upping our game in both areas under Klopp.

4.) 02 Sep 2016 00:39:47
No it isn't a concern is it. They were deemed not to be good enough at Liverpool and no other top teams came in to get them. That's the point. They have gone to what we might all consider to be 'lesser' teams to have a career. The point being that we have not lost any brilliant players this window that other elite clubs ŵere after.

5.) 02 Sep 2016 04:28:59
They may not be going to bigger club but they are definitely getting a bigger pay cheque than rotting in our reserves.



28 Jul 2016 02:14:18
So who do we all think has done the best business this transfer window so far in terms of ins and outs regardless of money spent or recouped?


1.) 28 Jul 2016 04:50:37

2.) 28 Jul 2016 07:58:19
We have 👍🏼.



14 Jul 2015 09:56:02
So which of the top 6 have done the best transfer business so far in respect of both ins and outs, notwithstanding the money involved? Thoughts?


1.) 14 Jul 2015 10:36:48

2.) 14 Jul 2015 10:07:42
MU clearly.

3.) 14 Jul 2015 10:08:23
Manchester United with gritted teeth.
If I had to rank them I'd say
Manchester United
Liverpool /Chelsea
Tottenham Hotspurs

4.) 14 Jul 2015 10:08:32
May be too early but at the moment I think liverpool followed by United if money is not a factor. Once we get our hands on benteke I think it'll be a good window for us.

5.) 14 Jul 2015 10:12:59
The mancs unfortunately

6.) 14 Jul 2015 10:14:31
Arsenal - Cech by far best signing I think he could be player that wins them the league.

7.) 14 Jul 2015 10:14:39
Man Utd are targeting and fixing their problem areas, very poor in midfield last season so they have Schneiderlin in as a top DM and Bastian beside him to create going forward, problem fixed.
They'll bring in a top class striker next to get them 20 goals a season to go along with Rooneys 20 so no problem with goals. Delay will contribute 10 to 15 goals but will also supply great balls in for the man mountain of Fellaini.
If De Gea goes they will spend big and bring in a top GK too be sure of that.
I think they will have a great chance of regaining the title.

8.) 14 Jul 2015 10:19:55
United. They'be brought in quality.

9.) 14 Jul 2015 10:23:27
Arsenal for me. No major outs. Cech in.

10.) 14 Jul 2015 10:24:14
Utd. Depay looks awesome. We know Both midfield signing yesterday are of the highest level. If they keep De Gea, get Di Maria playing to his best then it's them or Chelsea for title.

Chelsea close 2nd. They already had the squad to best. Now add a top quality no.2 and you'd expect Jose to get something from Falcao who's now had a season here to adjust. Plus a couple of Brazilan youngsters which are tipped for the top.

It'll be interesting to see who City and Arsenal buy. But City are linked with spending huge of top level quality. It's difficult to see anyone breaking these for top four.

{Ed002's Note - Chelsea will also announce a Chilean signing in the coming days and are still looking for a player or two - but perhaps not for the first team. And they have a very good player back from loan who will be part of the first team squad. Manchester United are pushing for a striker - as are Arsenal. City are looking toward a deal for de Bryune in the coming days but are focussing on selling a couple of forwards right now.}

11.) 14 Jul 2015 10:56:23
Cech is obviously a top signing fir arsenal

Clyne and firmino for us and getting 49mil for sterling.

Schneiderlin and depay for united look like good signings not to sure on schweinsteiger there's a reason bayern are willing to sell him now.

Don't see how falcao will fit in at Chelsea.

12.) 14 Jul 2015 10:58:08
I think ours is ok thus far. This will be diminished if we massively over pay for Benteke and sell Lucas. United are splashing the cash but they don't instill fear

Interested to see what else Arsenal and Chelsea do. I can see Arsenal pulling a Bender brother or similar type player out of the hat and massively improving their midfield steel.

13.) 14 Jul 2015 11:02:23
Arsenal, since Wenger listen Ed01 these days :). three signings all they need and they haev bagged one, With their interest in an upgrade on Coquelin and one class striker.
Agree with Sam.

14.) 14 Jul 2015 11:03:16
Probably Man U closely followed by us then arsenal

15.) 14 Jul 2015 11:12:38
I'm not sure about Outs transfer wise but in regards to INs, you might think I'm crazy and most likely no one will agree but the transfer window should be used for what teams need, and I mean really need. So I have too say arsenal, I think Peter cech is a massive component in regards to what arsenal are trying to achieve premier league wise. They developed a certain swagger towards the end of the the last campaign that for me was a consistent eye opener. They still could do with a top draw CB and Maybe a top 20 goal a season striker, but even without the striker prem wise, I feel they'll run chelsea close this season. The jury's well and truly out for us, so many new signings and changes I'm not sure anyone can predict what we will do but maybe that's for the best. Utd have made some astute buys but that defence cannot be over looked, there not poor players but for some reason they leave the back door key in full view of everyone and then de gea has to bail them out, even with the "schmidfield" if de gea leaves and they don't buy a leading CB this united renaissance may stutter but I expect further tactical tinkering so well see. Next for chelsea it's get falcao firing and back up for fabregas in the second half of the season and they'll be thereabouts as usua they've signed a couple young talented brazilians too but I'm not familiar with them. As for city the media are of the impression that sterlings answers all there problems, as though they had attacking problems, there problem was defence the constant changing of kompanys partner has had the skrtel effect. There unfamiliararity leads kompany to have cover for them and that entail leads to mistakes so city still need to shape up defensively. In my opinion mangala and demichellis are no world beaters but they'll still be top 4 even though I feel they have the weakest manager prem wise, inside the top four. As for Tottenham they'll no doubt scout other teams scouts and then proceed to outbid said scouts team therefore accruing numerous players they do not need which will end them up in the Europa league again only to rebuild again. And with Everton i strongly feel that without the dreaded Europa league, and the now addition of the tricky fan favourite winger delfoue (or whatever his cartoon character sounding name is) an believe it or not cleverly whom played his best football to date under Martinez, will make Everton a tricky opposition. So in summary: Arsenal : ).

Great question by the way.

16.) 14 Jul 2015 11:13:42
Guys i think we forgot O'Driscoll's signing.With the new coaching staff and by signing a striker if possible kovacic,then we have a squad to challenge for title and should defo get into top 4.We r only lacking in GK department.If United don't replace De Gea properly then they will have a big problem in defence.

17.) 14 Jul 2015 11:16:53
Id would say Arsenal. they've strenghtened their main weak point, but are still short in DM and could do with another Striker.
Man United, whilst doing well with Schneiderlin and Schweini have been naiive in leaving themselves short of strikers, so far.
Watford with Capue and Stambouli or Palace with Cabaye have done best business. Newcastle getting Windjalum is a great signing.

18.) 14 Jul 2015 11:22:46
Out of curiosity which strikers are Man Untied and arsenal pushing for?

{Ed002's Note - Try their pages.}

19.) 14 Jul 2015 12:13:49
United have signed the best by far and if the lose de gea could get in ramos and loris so would be overall better. But still think Chelsea for the title as their is little room for improvement. Lost Cech but got in Begovic and tbf off the top of my head think few if any signings made by any BPL club this summer would improve Chelsea's starting XI.

20.) 14 Jul 2015 12:23:45
Ibe, you question United's defense, they had one of the best defensive records in the league last year. 3rd least goals conceded I believe, they don't look much on paper or on tv for that matter but they didn't do too bad.
With Kovacic costing so much I wonder why we didn't sign Cabaye or Windjalum??

21.) 14 Jul 2015 12:42:45

de gea's performances over the season really flattered united's defence

22.) 14 Jul 2015 12:47:05

Isn't that Ed01 has been saying we are not strengthning the position we should be doing.



07 Jul 2015 15:00:30
Can any of the Eds please explain why there are some media reports suggesting that Danny Ings may never kick a ball for Liverpool due to the case having to be considered by a tribunal to set the level of compensation, and Spurs having bid 12 million previously.



{Ed001's Note - because we have to pay up the amount decided or he will not be allowed to register with us.}

1.) 07 Jul 2015 15:49:06
Resulting in him having to register with another team? Are there any known precedents you know of where the team chosen by the player has refused to pay the set amount? Seems like a restraint of trade for the individual if he's a free agent and out of contract.

Thanks Ed001

{Ed002's Note - Liverpool are committed to pay the amount decided. Burney want £8M and Liverpool don't want to pay it.}

2.) 07 Jul 2015 16:17:51
So the free singing has become a decent amount signing then.

3.) 07 Jul 2015 16:28:16
Maybe all those posters about 'Ings on a free is a no brainer' won't be quite so pleased with that business if he costs us 8 mil plus in fees. No disrespect to Ings but he is far from the finished article. He needs games and I don't think he'll get them under the current regime. Let's hope I'm wrong.

{Ed002's Note - It was always going to be the case that Liverpool would be liable to pay Burnley for the player, plus a signing on fee to the player, plus agent fees etc..}

4.) 07 Jul 2015 16:46:05
I agree eds, and you sad it numerous times on here. Shouldnt as a surprise but it will to some.

5.) 07 Jul 2015 17:07:07
There is no such thing as a a free transfer in the sense that it will cost the club nothing. Its quite simple to understand that. No fans can be as delusional as to believe he would cost nothing. This was made clear on the site many many times.

6.) 07 Jul 2015 17:31:29
He would have cost only a signing on fee and other expenses ( which is a part of every transfer ). Now it looks like he would be close to a 10 mill player including all the above.

{Ed002's Note - No, that was never the case.}

7.) 07 Jul 2015 18:13:48
Ed02, Ooops I forgot to add up the tribunal compensation, but majority here would have thought a very minimal amount in compensation.

Thanks for clearing up mate.

{Ed002's Note - Liverpool has offered what they see as fair, Burnley have asked what they see as fair. Neither will want a third party to decide.}

8.) 07 Jul 2015 19:32:11
Seems a tad extortionate




Wavy123's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

21 Jul 2017 08:21:36
Nor is Keita PowerLFC.!




Click To View This Thread

20 Sep 2016 19:20:51
Read the BBC website have you?! 😂.




Click To View This Thread

09 Sep 2016 00:05:53
Well that explains it then.




Click To View This Thread

16 Aug 2016 12:47:47
Benteke will be a deadline day signing for someone. For £30million.




Click To View This Thread

01 Aug 2016 16:45:39
Waro, I never said I didn't believe you at all. Nor that you were making stuff up to look ITK. I was simply saying that you can still post rumours you hear even if from a source you don't know so well, and just say that it's from an untested source. No problem with that. If you had posted the info as soon as you heard it you would have been proved right by now!





Wavy123's banter replies


Click To View This Thread

28 Jul 2017 14:35:58
Ed002, I think he means buy him now and loan him back for a season!


{Ed002's Note - Whay would Liverpool do that?



Click To View This Thread

20 Sep 2016 19:25:43
I agree with mikey, you need a settled team playing as a unit. Brilliant almost embarrassingly good squad of individuals to pick from, but with that comes it's own problems. Rest assured you will be challenging, but for top 4 I think, not the title this year. Liverpool will be too 4. 😉.




Click To View This Thread

02 Sep 2016 00:39:47
No it isn't a concern is it. They were deemed not to be good enough at Liverpool and no other top teams came in to get them. That's the point. They have gone to what we might all consider to be 'lesser' teams to have a career. The point being that we have not lost any brilliant players this window that other elite clubs ŵere after.




Click To View This Thread

17 Aug 2016 09:47:08
Another day, another stupid post about a left back!




Click To View This Thread

16 Jul 2015 16:40:23
Why not Ed002? Who would you have chosen out of those available? And perhaps just for fun, who out of all those deemed out of reach/unavailable?


{Ed002's Note - I have no interest in the fantasy football stuff but I have explained before that Mitrovic would have been ideal.}