Liverpool Rumours Member Posts


Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

(single word yields best result)

DAPred's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team: Liverpool

Where from: Singapore

Favourite player: Steven Gerrard

Best team moment: When LFC nearly won the BPL during the 2013/2014 season.

Interests: Anything that has to do with Liverpool FC

Timezone: (GMT +8:00) Beijing, Perth, Singapore, Hong Kong

DAPred's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To DAPred's Posts



To DAPred's last 5 rumours posts


To DAPred's last 5 banter posts


To DAPred's last 5 rumour replies


To DAPred's last 5 banter replies


DAPred's rumours posts with other poster's replies to DAPred's rumours posts


16 Apr 2015 08:27:32
hi Eds, I read that Arsenal are also interested to sign Milner. I'm sure they will have the upper hand if it is true as they are almost guaranteed a CL spot. Any truth in the rumour?


{Ed002's Note - I am not aware of any interest from them.}

1.) 16 Apr 2015 09:23:36
No one else showing real intetest at this stage then ed? I think he would be a good addition if we can get him, do you?

{Ed002's Note - Manchester City were looking for James Milner to agree a new contract but they accepted that he won't. There is interest from Valencia (although I think they have now moved on), Roma (with rekindled interest), Inter and from Liverpool - his wage demands might be an issue.}




DAPred's banter posts with other poster's replies to DAPred's banter posts


09 Jun 2017 15:53:48
Hi Eds, since we have publicly apologized and backed out of the deal to sign VVD, do you think that this will actually favour Southampton? I mean, I don't think that they will want to keep an unhappy player.

Southampton's actions might make it easier for Chelsea or City to get the player, since its no secret that he has the desire to leave. Would the whole thing backfire on Southampton and they might end up getting less than what Liverpool has offered?

Having said that, I still have a tiny hope that we can somehow land him if Liverpool can sort out the differences with Southampton.


{Ed001's Note - no idea how you figure this out. Saints are not going to lose out, he will have to waive his cut of the transfer fee to leave.}

1.) 09 Jun 2017 16:15:52
He's not coming. We've seen to that by our own stupid actions. Forget about Salah as well. That's now at an end. We literally are the worst at going about business. If you're expecting top class players forget it. It's also rans and never have beens as that's all they're equipped to go for.

{Ed002's Note - Liverpool has not offered anything to Southampton.}

2.) 09 Jun 2017 16:24:45
Ed can I ask please how it works or were we are at on this, am I right in thinking the negotiations with his agent/ him now mean nothing and if we are to pick the deal up again we are starting from scratch once we have asked the Saints if we can talk to the player/ agent? Also am I right in thinking we will not contact them now unless the player hands in a transfer request? Just trying to weigh things up.

{Ed002's Note - Liverpool made an illegal approach for a player - it is not allowed. Liverpool may yet be charged. They have disgraced themselves yet again and yet again shown a total disregard for others and for players. They have lied to the FA recently whilst fouling up the career of a 12 year old and have apending court case whilst currently serving a ban. Rotten to the core. The club has issued a statement that that have dropped all interest in the player - you don't seem to get any of this.}

3.) 09 Jun 2017 16:36:01
Have any talks taken place since the whole debacle earlier in the week ed002? or any provision to hold talks? Between Liverpool and S'ton I mean obvs.


{Ed002's Note - About what?}

4.) 09 Jun 2017 16:48:28
Ed002 that's what I meant by us being the worst, we haven't spoken directly to the club and through being underhand and thinking that it's being clever we've completed ballsed up any chance of a deal. I'm still livid that people employed by the club thinks that it's ok.

5.) 09 Jun 2017 16:53:21
Why would it?
We have publicly declared we are no longer interested in signing the player!

6.) 09 Jun 2017 16:58:02
Its obviously been widely reported, as you also have stated, that S'ton will be now slapping a £70m figure on VVD's head.

I guess what i'm asking is, does it look like we are going to go back with our tail between our legs and meet with them over a a potential transfer, or do you see it as totally dead in the water?

i know its an embarrassing step for the club if they were to do that, but just wondered if there is any info at this stage.

Sorry for the confusion.

{Ed002's Note - The club have made a public statement that there is no more interest.}

7.) 09 Jun 2017 17:01:25
No matter how much we may love Liverpool we must step back and objectively analyze their actions as an organization. Liverpool has been ethically and legally negligent with transfers. The sooner we as supporters realize that the better.



08 Jun 2017 06:52:14
Hi EDs, I'm truly disappointed in the way that Liverpool has handled the entire VVD situation. Clearly, we need to be more careful in our future dealings to avoid something similar from happening again.

With Liverpool officially apologizing and backing out of the deal, claiming that they have ended any interest in the player, one would assume that we'll move on to other targets now but how will this affect our relationship with Southampton? I mean, could we still go for their players in the future? I mean, if they are really pissed at us, they wouldn't want to have any dealings with us again, right?


{Ed001's Note - we would have to make sure all our dealings with them are correct and work to rebuild the relationship as well. There are many ways we could go about doing that. For starters, if it was me, I would ask them about playing a preseason friendly so they can get the proceeds etc.}



07 Jun 2017 03:04:00
Hi EDs, thanks for keeping us updated and providing your insights on the transfer rumours.

I noticed that Klopp has not signed any players from Dortmund although we got plenty of rumours about Reus, Aubameyang, Pulisic etc. Do you think he is against raiding his old club out of respect? Or maybe he likes the idea of working with players that he has never worked with before?



{Ed001's Note - he said when he left he would not be looking to steal all their best players out of respect.}

1.) 07 Jun 2017 04:45:04
Thanks for the reply Ed001, so in that case we can bury all the Pulisic and Aubameyang rumours. Not like we were going to sign him anyway :)

{Ed001's Note - he wouldn't sign Aubameyang anyway, he is a problem to deal with that Klopp simply would not want. You know he missed a Champions League game this season because he was out on the lash in Milan instead don't you?}

2.) 07 Jun 2017 05:36:46
He was with me at the time be to fair he stuck to tonic.

3.) 07 Jun 2017 08:50:14
With his gin?

4.) 07 Jun 2017 09:40:39
Klopp also said in an interview that he had no interest in buying players he has worked with previously.



13 Oct 2015 02:15:28
Fresh from being appointed as the new Liv manager, rumours are already flooding in even before our first game under Klopp. I personally believe its a ll media bullsh*t. Common sense would suggest that Klopp will need to access the players he inherited and see how they respond to his training and tactics. Even those left out by Rodgers previously would have a fresh opportunity to impress. So, I don't see why there should be talks of any ins or outs before we even kick the ball. Having said that, I'm sure he will need to tweak the team a bit when the opportunity arises, hopefully in the Jan transfer window.


1.) 13 Oct 2015 09:40:59
We all knew there was weak areas of the squad before Klopp arrived and I really can't see this changing much. Klopp may well improve every player individually but is Mignolet going to become a world class keeper all of a sudden? CDM may well be another area that needs work. Rossiter may well come through and earn his place, Lucas I see as good for cover. Some have mentioned Can for that role but I don't see that happening as all his big weaknesses are defensive. Your also losing his big strengths IMO, his energy and willingness to run with the ball, his vision and ability to pick a pass. All of us can only guess though, just like the media. I doubt even Klopp himself has much of an idea yet.



21 Apr 2015 04:05:14
Hi Eds,
Things are not going particularly well for Liverpool at the moment. There are growing unrest about BR's future but I'm sure that will only be determined at the end of the season. My question is, IF Rodgers were to be sacked, will it in any way affect our current transfer targets? I'm sure every manager will have their own list of players they want to manage. Thanks!


{Ed002's Note - There would likely be some minor differences.}




DAPred's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

19 Jun 2017 02:25:14
Hi Eds, Thanks for providing some insight on the Mendy situation. While it is certainly encouraging that we're in the mix for the best players available, I'm just not sure if we'll be able to afford paying 180k-220k/ week for a left back, if the rumours of about his salary is true. Unless of course we are just using the VVD money and investing it on Mendy instead.




Click To View This Thread

05 Jun 2017 15:12:39
I'm feeling ecstatic! When should we expect the official announcement to be made?




Click To View This Thread

05 Jun 2017 02:35:47
Hi Eds, you mentioned that Brant wants to have guaranteed first team action. Is this a normal thing to ask for? I mean, how can a manager guarantee a starting spot when a lot depends on how he performs and adapts to the prem league? What motivation will players get in training, if they know they will be picked even if they are lazy or not up to scratch? If you say he wants to add a performance based bonus, that would make more sense. On one hand, it is good that he's showing that he wants to play week in week out, but on the other hand, its a bit disrespectful to be demanding a spot in the starting line up when everyone else has to fight for their spot in training. If he's good enough, he'll be picked anyways.


{Ed002's Note - It happens regularly and obviously if the player is performing poorly he won't expect to be picked. You seem to have taken this to an extreme position.}



Click To View This Thread

05 Jun 2017 02:28:18
VVD is good but is he 60mil and 200k/ week type of good? I really don't know. While it is nice that we can challenge the likes for City and Chelsea for his signature, I hope that if its true, VVD will pick us because he wants to play for Klopp and not because its money motivated. Of course, money speak volumes these days and who can blame them? But apart from money, I think coming to Liverpool makes more sense because he should know that he'll be the main man in defense, and we need him more than City or Chelsea.




Click To View This Thread

31 May 2017 07:06:34

I agree that going for Clichy doesn't sound interesting or ambitious and I'm not a fan of Clichy to begin with. However, sometimes we need to be realistic. Just because we made it into the top 4, and everyone's reporting that we have money to spend, it doesn't mean the sky's the limit or we'll get whoever we want.

If certain rumours are true, such as VVD for 50mil, Keita for another 50, Lacazette for 50 as well, then we go for Mendy for 34mil, and Salah for another 30-40mil. That alone is already more than 200mil. Is this possible? Are we the next Chelsea or City?

So, coming back to reality, if we want money to spend on the likes of VVD and Keita, then we'll have to compromise by going for some cheaper options. So, how does that justify hate campaigns like Kloppout or FSGout?





DAPred's banter replies


Click To View This Thread

07 Jun 2017 04:45:04
Thanks for the reply Ed001, so in that case we can bury all the Pulisic and Aubameyang rumours. Not like we were going to sign him anyway :)


{Ed001's Note - he wouldn't sign Aubameyang anyway, he is a problem to deal with that Klopp simply would not want. You know he missed a Champions League game this season because he was out on the lash in Milan instead don't you?}