Liverpool Rumours Member Posts


Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

(single word yields best result)

waynechai's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



waynechai's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To waynechai's Posts



To waynechai's last 5 rumour replies


To waynechai's last 5 banter replies


waynechai has no Rumours Posts



waynechai has no Banter Posts



waynechai's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

05 Jun 2018 04:53:31
Agreed ed001!
Welll said.


{Ed001's Note - thank you mate.}



Click To View This Thread

11 Mar 2018 03:34:19
Never had TAA been a right back, even if he had put in decent performance.
No way a good right back will allow the first shot to be made and hit the target. It is obviou and the defender should know Rashford is right footed and will switch to his right foot. Beside at that angle, a proper defender would close angle to goal naturally anyway.
TAA didn’t, and didn’t read the danger and he had been depending on his pace to bail himself out frequently.

As I said in my much ealier post, even if TAA is as talented as many make him out to be (and I have personally see nothing of that sort, but choose not to dispute that at this juncture), he is definitely not a right back.




Click To View This Thread

07 Feb 2018 13:47:21
The issue is really not Kane saying that he felt a touch and so he went down.
The seeming legitimacy of that is the issue.

Personally, if the touch is insufficient to make you fall but your u deliberately fall, that has to be defined as a “dive”.

The same apply for the Lamela situation.
It is a dive.

As for the offfside decision, I saw Alan Shearer and Sherwood as pundits.
Both find it incredible that it was not an offside decision, and more so when The ex referee Gallagher or whatever his name is said that is the stated rule. That Louvren touched it and therefore it is not offsite.

This entire thing sucks.
Even if it is indeed according to the rule, the linesman should have raised his flag. Then it is up to the referee to overwrite him.

And for the 2nd penalty, referee who was nearer had already signaled play on, and then changed his mind.
I have nothing to say if he hasn’t done that.

In any case, go see Clattenburg’s comment.
He clearly think the first penalty is an off-site.
Whatever Louvren does is irrelevant.
His intention is to clear the ball because someone is behind him, and that someone is offside. Period.

Not to say Tottenham doesn’t deserve it for apart for Salah’s goal, they were superior all round.
Still, we were robbed.




Click To View This Thread

16 Jan 2018 15:13:42
"Were you banged on the head repeatedly as a child? If you were it is OK to admit it - most Liverpool supporters were it seems"

What is this for?
Having superior knowledge doesn't give anybody the right to insult millions and millions of people.

I think there was a certain degree of respect for the eds and that's why StableGenius asked those questions they way he asked. That's my surmise.


{Ed002's Note - You provide an excellent demonstration that many the Liverpool fans once known for their sense of humour have turned in to miserable damp patches.}



Click To View This Thread

16 Jan 2018 15:28:34
In my mind, I am thinking in this specific case, what is Kloop to say?
I am pretty sure he is not like meeting a reporter and before being asked, state "Yes, Karius is number 1 for now".
Surely, he must have been asked the question "Why Karius? "

If we are not debating his decision to start with Karius, but his response to the question, what is is supposed to say:
1. I wake up this morning and I feel like doing so
2. Just like before, I think Mig is tired and I am resting him (like in Arsenal game) .
3. No specific reason
4. Karius is doing better in training is thus I am choosing him.
and etc.

Whatever his response, there will be criticism.
And whatever his response, he will blurting it out publicly.
I see nothing wrong therefore with what he said.

If we are debating his decision, we should look at Ed25's response, which agree.
Like I said in my earlier post, there will come a point in time (which we supporters are thinking that it has came too late) that Kloop will be writing Mig off.
The point in time is now, as it seemed from Kloop.

No matter how Karius is performing, I do see him staying between the post.
I am surmising that Ward might even get a game in place of Mig between now and end of season.





waynechai's banter replies


Click To View This Thread

06 Jun 2017 04:08:24
Good point.
In an ideal world, I would love to have 2 new full backs.
One in each flank.
It is a pity that Moreno doesn't work out, Clyne not the kinds of full back we need, and Milner has his shortcoming.
And TAA in my opinion is also not quite there yet.
I would probably sell Clyne and Moreno, with Milner and TAA as back up.

P. S. thought Moreno should have been more a chance against the lesser team, ahead of Milner, and see if that's what we need, that is speed, a bit more skill going forward and ability to go to the byline and cutback or crosses. Now we never know.




Click To View This Thread

03 May 2017 06:23:46
When did ed001 called Clyne a weak link? I missed that, but it echoed my thoughts exactly. Even Milner outshone Clyne as a fullback, and that said a lot.

He see a lot fight balls going forward, but has done precious nothing with it, no taking it to the byline and cross, and in facet the less said about his crossing the better.
Had not seen him being a menace on the ball like a Johnson was.

I have seen many goals (and ed, your footage will help) where crosses come in from the left, or second ball falling into our right, that Clyne is not tracking an incoming attacker.

The one plus point about Clyne is his fitness though, as in he seldom get injured.


{Ed001's Note - he is very quick and strong as well.}