Liverpool Transfer Rumours


Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

(single word yields best result)

Correct Score Competition Entry

Most of the posts go to the Liverpool Banter page

Also more posts are being added to the Liverpool Other Posts page

26 Aug 2016 22:22:29
Liverpool have bid 11 million for pulisic and have offered to loan him back to Dortmund for the rest of the season.

Believable15 Unbelievable25

27 Aug 2016 12:10:22
Seems like a sensible thing to do.
Who do we sign to replace him whilst he's on loan?

Agree1 Disagree5

27 Aug 2016 14:10:31
I think the bigger question, Ron, is how many do we sign to replace him? Just in case the replacement gets an injury.

Agree1 Disagree4

28 Aug 2016 00:47:29
No matter how many times I've read this post today, I keep misreading "Pulisic" as "Pulls". 😑😑😑.

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Aug 2016 02:14:42
I don't see the sense of loaning him back to Dortmund when they are looking to loan him out to another Bundesliga side. Plus didn't they just reject Stoke City's 20m bid? So why would they accept our 11m bid? This is like when Rodgers came we were linked with every Swansea or Chelsea youth player.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Aug 2016 22:04:32
Liverpool have bid for Pulisic. (Tony Barrett)

Believable15 Unbelievable10

26 Aug 2016 22:13:38
Any of the eds know anything on this?

Agree3 Disagree9

{Ed091's Note - seems unlikely,

26 Aug 2016 22:18:34
If it's true, it's hardly what we need. Even Stevie Wonder can see we need a left back and possibly a DM. It's absolutely incredible if this happens. What's happening at the club? Starting to lose it with this lot. Square pegs in round holes. I could select a better team right now.

Agree6 Disagree12

26 Aug 2016 22:25:47
Paul Joyce also reporting an £11million bid for Pulisic.
I doubt Dortmund will want to sell him to us. Would be a great buy though.

Agree7 Disagree7

26 Aug 2016 22:46:24
Looks like it's true Joyce, Barrett and Bascombe have all reported it. Apparently Stoke have also made a similar offer. Bascombe say's it's unlikely to come off though.

Agree1 Disagree7

26 Aug 2016 23:28:12
He's a winger lol. Pacy. We only have one of those in the team that is apparently going to feature. You all saw what happened when we were missing Mane. He's a great young talent and I think a good addition.

Agree11 Disagree6

27 Aug 2016 01:58:47
very odd move, i don't think its true.

Agree1 Disagree7

27 Aug 2016 02:18:31
He is not as pacy or powerful like mane. Not really impress by him. Not sure y we gg for him . Delofeu of everton is a trickier winger.

Agree1 Disagree16

27 Aug 2016 02:45:58
Not sure why anyone would be unhappy with us signing a young, promising winger really. If Klopp wants a LB, he'll sign one as well, it's not like we can only make one more signing or anything- clearly he's not as concerned about it as most supporters (rightly or wrongly) .

Agree9 Disagree4

27 Aug 2016 03:19:29
We have American owners, no team has really taken hold of american market yet, you can bet the owners want to change that and nothing puts american butts in front of TV's like cheering for their own. If Pulisic were to develop into anything resembling Gotze before Bayern move, or Reus, the commercial possibilities would be incredible. You can bet that TV people would ensure to televise Liverpool games in prime spots giving us the heads up on every other team. He also fits a profile of young player that Klopp would want to develop.

Klopp knows the player, worked with him, we can see he has bags of talent, if Klopp things he can develop him into a great player, I say go get him, even if he costs 20-30 million.

Agree7 Disagree10

27 Aug 2016 03:45:26
Come one leekuanyew the lad is still 17, must you be a bell in every post you make?

Agree13 Disagree2

27 Aug 2016 10:10:11
Mflis - I was saying similar stuff a while back. Hope it happens!

Agree1 Disagree1

27 Aug 2016 11:33:10
He's only 17. Nobody said we're buying him for the first team. We're lacking in depth in the wing position in the under 21s too.

Agree2 Disagree1

27 Aug 2016 12:11:49
Does anyone remember a kid called Ojo?
Who does he play for these days?

Agree3 Disagree0

27 Aug 2016 12:05:21
What's this fascination with signing a 'DM'? Do you people nor realise that Can, Henderson, Stewart and Brannagan are central midfielders? Not to mention Grujic.

Agree5 Disagree4

27 Aug 2016 11:59:25

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Aug 2016 15:00:23
cant see this transfer coming off, he is def one for the future, but I would prefer that we sign someone for this season, thought we played well today, but not getting the 3 points shows that there are area s were we can improve .

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Aug 2016 16:31:08
Mainznilfunf of the midfielders you mention Brannagan is too lightweight to be an effective central midfielder, Henderson and Can are box to box midfielders and Stewart is untested at the highest level, so we do need a centre midfielder who can actually defend, or haven't you been watching us for the last year?

Agree1 Disagree1

27 Aug 2016 23:13:45
I'm sure David silva and modric play cm! Just saying!

Agree0 Disagree1

26 Aug 2016 17:20:32
Ed002 I see that the appreciation society has gone a bit dull lately. You not been feeling the love here recently?

Believable2 Unbelievable9

{Ed002's Note - I didn't know that and of course I don't know who runs it, but I appoint you my head of boosting. Sign up for the Ed002 Appreciation Society at: }

26 Aug 2016 18:04:42
Lol I dub thee head of boosting. I just google to see who you've wrecked recently and I haven't seen one in a while. Unfortunately I am not too fond of facebook. But know you're still #1 in my book Ed. Or #2.uhhhhh.

Agree0 Disagree10

27 Aug 2016 02:56:52
Been using this site for a few years, tho never posted/ registered before.

just wanted to thanks to all of the eds, and several posters who i always enjoy reading.

been here since dodgy sightings at lennon airport and no daft questions to the eds.

and ed2 who always makes me smile. thx for all the info you provide.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - You are welcome, and thanks for the kind words. As far as I know, nobody knows if he will be on the 1230 or 1300 arrival at John Lennon International today but there are bound to be a lot of fans at the airport hoping for a glimpse of him.}

26 Aug 2016 12:00:09
Hello Ed02, Anything new on Markovic mate? All gone quite I guess.

Believable0 Unbelievable7

{Ed002's Note - Fenerbahce wanted to sign him but would not give certain guarantees. Fiorentina, Schalke and Roma are all clubs that have contacted his agent but it is Lazio who have had what they consider a decent offer rejected by Liverpool. Milan are open to a move but would prefer a loan.}

26 Aug 2016 13:04:58
Mate do you think he would be moving this window? I don't see him in Klopp's plans.

Agree0 Disagree7

{Ed002's Note - Only if someone is dumb enough to pay the asking price, if Liverpool reduce the asking price or if he goes on loan.}

26 Aug 2016 13:21:42
Well we just can't keep paying his wages for nothing. It would be nice to move him on. What's the use of us paying the wage and he plays for another team?
Thanks mate.

Agree1 Disagree6

26 Aug 2016 19:27:17
Can't be buying players for 20 mil and giving them away either . 15 mil will do . Anything less is just pointless.

Agree6 Disagree3

25 Aug 2016 11:09:45
Reports linking us with Charlie Taylor of Leeds. Is there any truths to this ed?

I read a little bit on him and he's a left back who can also play left wing. Is on the last year of his contract and has handed over a transfer request.

Believable4 Unbelievable14

{Ed002's Note - I am not aware of any approach from Liverpool but both West Brom and Middlesbrough have spoken with Leeds about Mr Taylor.}

26 Aug 2016 16:01:05
LFC are not signing a LB this window. Expect Balo and some of the squad players to move on before end of the window. Perhaps a holding midfielder/ deep lying midfielder is the only possibility of anything coming in.


Agree3 Disagree3

28 Aug 2016 02:43:55
I hear that Lucas leiva is a great holding mid. Should be pretty cheap too.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Aug 2016 17:53:31
FC Sion president Christian Constantin has confirmed that the club are in talks to sign Mario Balotelli. Fees rumored to be €5 mill.

Just passing the info.

Believable12 Unbelievable28

24 Aug 2016 18:53:44
Yeah but you forgot to add it's only a loan deal.

Agree6 Disagree1

24 Aug 2016 18:53:53
Reading it's a loan.

Agree2 Disagree1

24 Aug 2016 19:16:34
A loan.? But he only has 1 year left on his Liverpool contract.

Agree1 Disagree4

24 Aug 2016 20:25:38
is that all we have to give them .

Agree7 Disagree5

24 Aug 2016 20:30:52
If it's true he only has a year then we should take it get the loan fee and then he's effectively gone. Clubs know we are desperate to get rid and will only look for a loan deal. Plus he can be a problem so teams not that willing to take a chance on buying permanently.

Agree4 Disagree6

25 Aug 2016 07:12:43
If he has 1 year left on contract, then why would teams want to buy, when they can loan for a year and get him for no club fee!

Agree0 Disagree7

25 Aug 2016 20:46:12
Without a fee a loan can be recalled I believe.
A loan means we don't pay a year of his wages so I'd be happy with that.

Agree1 Disagree4

26 Aug 2016 00:02:39
Loan fee and whatever saving we get on his wages. Then gone next season.

What's the issue!

Agree0 Disagree3

26 Aug 2016 09:54:50
I suspect we will almost certainly be paying part of his wages. How else do you think Sion can afford him?

Let's hope this gets done and we can cut our losses and move on.

Agree0 Disagree3

24 Aug 2016 12:21:06
Hi Ed's,

Thanks for all the up to date knowledge!

Just wondering if there is any activity within the youth set up of any in's outs loans permanent deals.

Believable0 Unbelievable11

{Ed001's Note - I am sure there will be a little bit, but it is not something that easy to find out about. It is usually much quicker to do a deal like that, so they don't really give anyone time to get an advance warning. You don't have to iron out contracts as well as sort out a deal between the clubs, as the players remain on the same contract as they already were on.}

24 Aug 2016 09:15:00
Hi Eds

It has been very disappointing that we haven't resolved our left back issues. Will you be able to give a wrap up of what is in the pipelines regarding out goings and possible "incomings"? which i doubt there will be any

What we know thus far
Alberto to Fenerbache
Illori to Galatasary.

Believable0 Unbelievable8

{Ed002's Note - Balotelli will leave as well. Markovic will leave if a buyer can be found. There is no buyer for Sakho, so a loan seems likely.}

24 Aug 2016 09:25:21
Moby I think our incomings are done mate tbh.

Agree7 Disagree14

24 Aug 2016 09:53:26
i agree Lfc forever, was hoping otherwise though. I do feel sorry for milner. you could see last night he played tentatively when going down the left and final balls lacked quality. his bright moments came when he switched to the right. Hope Klopp has another plan use an academy lb perhaps?

Agree3 Disagree8

24 Aug 2016 10:38:08
Should we not be in for Joe Hart? Granted, he may have to lower his wage demands.

Agree1 Disagree27

{Ed001's Note - why? We brought in 2 keepers and Hart is not very good. Why on earth would anyone want him?}

24 Aug 2016 10:59:01
What's this obsession with Hart?

Agree15 Disagree3

24 Aug 2016 11:35:59
I think joe Hart would have been an excellent addition to our squad if we didn't buy karius. I haven't seen much of karius but I don't think it right to buy a keeper and stunt his potential development by not playing him much. For that reason I wouldn't buy Hart but if we could have bought Hart at the beginning of the window then I would have went for him if an acceptable package could have been agreed. he very vocal, a leader within the dressing room who has been a number one for 10 years so would know all about the pressures of being in the spotlight all the time. I actually think he a major upgrade on mignolet aswel in all aspects of his game. as things turn out tho we have karius so we should get behind him once he back from injury. who knows he might be an absolute beast?

Agree9 Disagree21

24 Aug 2016 12:01:51
Sorry Kjmainstreet, but Hart is terrible i wouldn't have bought him even if we didn't buy karius, I would of kept Ward. why do the english media make so much of english players? Overhyped in my opinion, that's the problem with english national team overhyped by the media and continually dissapoints. Echo does the same with liverpool.

Agree11 Disagree8

24 Aug 2016 12:27:16
I don't think signing karius is a 'mistake' or anything I jus think our league is a difficult one to get used to and Hart has been a number one at a massive club playing for many years as first choice. he has had adversities throughout his time at city and has come through them. he has the right mentality to succeed and be a winner. as I said in my above post I hope karius proves to be as good as some of the German keepers in recent history. I just think In my opinion that we would b buying a ready made winner in Hart who would have been an upgrade on mignolet. as for ward I think a years loan at a championship/ lower prem team is best. unless klopp made him his number one this season because he needs to be playing regular football.

Agree4 Disagree9

{Ed001's Note - Hart has been number one purely because he is English and they want an English core. 4 managers have been there and not wanted him, surely that should tell you something? All of them didn't think he was good enough but struggled to recruit a replacement, until now. Hart is just not very good. He has done nothing in his career other than been behind a good team so he never had anything to do.}

24 Aug 2016 13:00:27
Hart is rubbish and we have karius anyway.

Also think we are crazy going into the season with milner as our LB.

Agree7 Disagree4

24 Aug 2016 13:36:37
I take on board what you are saying ed001, and I normally agree with most things you say but regardless of fees or who we have bought do you think Hart is an upgrade on mignolet? I agree with what a lot of people say he is English so the players get hyped up and made to be better than what the actualy are and I agree Hart falls into that category but I still think he a good keeper. he seems to me to be a vocal keeper who is respected by his fellow peers, I respect everyone's opinion on this matter and ov course if it was as easy as everyone agreeing we wouldn't have football forums. hope we can agree to maybe disagree on this one ed001?

Agree1 Disagree7

{Ed001's Note - what difference does it make if he is an upgrade on our back up keeper? The question is whether or not he is better than Karius. Sorry but peers respecting him? What does that even mean? That his fellow pros aren't slagging him off? When do you ever hear a current player slag off another current player publicly? Try watching Hart flap and throw the ball into the back of his net repeatedly, then you will see he is the English Mignolet, crap with the ball at his feet, unable to organise a defence and not much of a shotstopper.}

24 Aug 2016 13:57:09
I cannot understand some people's obsession with Hart. Karius will be no 1 when fit Klopp bought him for a reason to suit the way his teams play.

Agree1 Disagree5

24 Aug 2016 13:59:27
Ed001 I agree about Hart, and I was wondering from what you've seen on Karius how highly you rate him? I'm looking forward to his return!

Agree1 Disagree4

{Ed001's Note - not seen him play, but he can't be worse than Hart or Mignolet playing with a broken hand!}

24 Aug 2016 14:25:27
What! Mignolet hasn't had both broken ankles for the whole of last season, that's news to me! i thought his falling over all the time was due to serious long term injuries ;) as for Joe he's decent at best would put him in the same bracket as Forster and let's say butland for english keepers.

Agree1 Disagree5

24 Aug 2016 12:12:31
We should definitely buy Joe Hart.

Agree6 Disagree15

24 Aug 2016 16:17:38
I like Joe Hart. But i like him in the same way I like Djimi Traore or Emile Heskey. He tries hard and is very passionate, but that doesn't make him a good player. A leader? Yeah I can see that to be fair. He doesn't tolerate slackers. In terms of actual ability though, he has only gotten worse over the last 5 years, and he wasn't all that special to begin with.

Better than Mignolet, but that is like saying Danny Rose is a good left back because he is better than Moreno!

Agree3 Disagree5

24 Aug 2016 17:05:42
Sorry. I can't buy that Harts a terrible keeper. He's had more games notable for his excellent performances than nearly any keeper I can think of. Not seen enough of Karius to make a judgement on whether he's better than Hart, but I certainly hope he is, because that means we'll have a real keeper on our hands. Hart hasn't had it easy at city over the years and their defences have been ropey for large periods, if he was that much of a liability I'm sure they would have got rid. Being English didn't save the likes of Rodwell.

Agree4 Disagree10

24 Aug 2016 17:31:42
He has had exceptional performances RA, including one reasonably recently against Barcelona that at least kept them in the tie. Unfortunately over the last few seasons those performances have come fewer and further apart, while his errors have become more frequent and more catastrophic.
At the moment I would be no happier with him in net than mignolet.

Agree2 Disagree5

24 Aug 2016 17:33:29
I actually rate Hart, I think he's decent. He makes a few mistakes, but most keepers do. He's better than mignolet and to say he's worse than karius without having seen him play is odd to say the least.

Agree2 Disagree5

24 Aug 2016 19:17:05
Hart should stick to washing his hair.

Agree3 Disagree3

24 Aug 2016 19:24:39
Hart is an awful keeper and his mistakes are there for all to see. His howler at the Euros when Bale hit the free kick from 35 yards out and he still spilt it despite having all day to see it coming. Had Karius or Mingo or any other non English GK done that, he would have been slaughtered for it and rightfully so. But because Hart is English, the apologies and excuses came pouring out and now certain fans want him here if Karius hadn`t signe. The guy is awful and deserves the grief he gets, end of.

Agree3 Disagree3

24 Aug 2016 19:35:58
Hart was exceptional the first time city won the league. He has got worse but to say he's a bad keeper is a bit harsh I feel. That said I would t want him at Liverpool. He's not consistent and Like the rest of the team all I want is consistency rather than great one week awful the next. We'v had too many false dawns and Hart isn't what we need.

Agree2 Disagree4

24 Aug 2016 21:47:23
Agree with Hart, he is a rubbish keeper, even flicked on the Man city game tonight briefly and there he was flapping at crosses. Credit to Migs, at least he is a decent shotstopper, but if Hart was with our defence, he would probably be worse then Migs in my opinion, definitely just as bad, he will struggle when he moves on to a team who do not have as good of a defence as City does.

As for Sakho, has it really gotten that bad with him? I have not really been following his story since he was sent home from America. Is Klopp looking to get rid because of his attitude? I thought he was still injured, that's why he was still not in the team.

Agree0 Disagree3

25 Aug 2016 00:32:04
Joe Hart advertises Head and Shoulders and still has dandruff. Enough said, stay well clear.

Agree1 Disagree2

25 Aug 2016 10:14:01
All this fascination with Joe Hart is ridiculous, he only ever seems to be any good when he has Kompany infront of him to organise the defence.

In my personal opinion he only gets in the England team because he has a bigger name then the likes of Forster and Butland who are on their day better keepers and are more consistent albeit playing for smaller clubs.

Agree0 Disagree2

26 Aug 2016 09:24:58
It does make me laugh hearing some of this.

He only looks good because the City defence is great. Yet when the City defence is shredded it is Hart's fault even though the evidence is right in front of people's eyes that he has stopped them from shipping double figures in those games.

He's over-rated because he is English. Yet every other thing people are slagging him off with involves the words English or England - he wouldn't get half the crap he gets if he wasn't English. By the way if you want to see over-rated look at the hype that surrounded Courtois and then look at his performances. Oddly he isn't English.

Ed001 this one is for you I'm afraid (normally I agree with what you say), the comment wasn't that his peers don't slag him off, it was that his peers rate him. I've referenced before that Buffon who has been one of the best keepers in the world rates him and says it.

Hart was rubbish at the Euros so he's rubbish generally. OK so who here is prepared to make themselves look foolish by pointing out that Neuer was rubbish at the Euros so he must be rubbish all his career as well.

Take a look at the games v Liverpool and Barcelona, that isn't someone who isn't even a good shot stopper. (Also look up what at one time was called the golden glove ratings for EPL keepers each year - oh sorry I forgot that is because City's defence is amazing) .

I have a vested interest in keepers that I will declare, my son is a keeper and has been since the age of 7 and over the last few years it has been an eye opener just what goes on. He has been exposed to some poor coaching and some top level coaching - which is pretty much the same for most keepers. The development of keepers in this country is rubbish not because of ability or of numbers or of the quality of the dedicated GK coaches but because the way the game is structured at under age level is biased massively in favour of outfield players, every time the keeper gets into a stage where he can dominate you'll see the goals get bigger, the pitch gets bigger etc. Do people on here know just how few coaches at the grass roots under12 levels actually let their keepers take goal kicks? How many of them do any work on the keeper coming for the ball? Great deal of FA. It isn't helped by the simple fact that the top levels in English football have no interest whatsoever in English keepers. The likes of Hart and Butland are absolute rarities and if you want to talk about achievements being an English goalkeeper and getting into the top 2 divisions of English football as a starter is a massive achievement since most clubs/ managers only want to sign foreign keepers. And the scouting process is hit and miss as well, I heard a top flight club academy GK coach say that they have kids sent into them, by their own people, who can't do the basic drills that are a keepers day job and were sent through because the club's scout saw them play once and make one good save. The development of keepers in this country, in spite of some very good coaches trying to sort it out, is woeful. For those two to make it to premiership level in that situation is way more achievement than most seem to realise.

If you want to criticise keepers for being poor on crosses do some research first. One, take a look at the bucket loads of footage that is out there of the top keepers in training - see how much you can find of dealing with crosses that involves more than just the spare keeper standing in their way and not interfering. All the time and effort that coaches put into having the defence man mark, zonal mark, mark this type of player, stand here etc see how much you can find where they do that, with all the buffeting and illegal stuff and have the keeper coming to claim it. By the way next time you're at a match and hear the keeper call for the ball, take a look at how many defenders actually respond by clearing the way for him - great deal of none because they're too busy thinking about the shirt pulling contest and the coach ripping them a new one for their man getting to the ball first etc. Watch what is done with keepers as a pre match warm up on crosses and that is pretty much what gets done generally. If you have a keeper who is averaging 70-30 or 80-20 on effectively dealing with crosses you have a really good keeper. To put that into context if your midfielder has a pass completion rate of 70% or 80% that is seen as a decent performance. If your keeper does anything less than 100% it is seen as him being crap. Think about what you accept in other players and then whether you accept the same standards from the keeper.

On which subject just going consistently onto the pitch in the most exposed position takes bigger cajones than most keyboard critics will ever have to find out whether or not they have. It takes more guts just to be on the pitch than most outfield players have to realise. Then add in the fans, don't forget your keeper spends half of every game in front of the away fans. And you would not believe the number of keepers I've heard saying they're glad of that to get away from the rubbish thrown at them by their own fans.

If you want to criticise Hart for something then be realistic, he isn't a good footballer, he is a goalkeeper. Liverpool were lucky to have 2 naturally great keepers in the past in Clemence and Grobelaar who were more interested in trying out being outfield players and were allowed by their coaches to do it. But if your day job is to underwrite insurance and you happen to use a computer as a small part of that, should you be expected to be a secretarial level typist? If your day job is to train to do the many things a keeper already has to focus on are you going to become a good sweeper? Then add some context that most centre backs are poor distributers. Seriously watch how many will only pass when there is a clear run to the man and the recipient is in masses of space. There is a reason why genuine top level keepers who can play as a true sweeper (i. e. be a passer not a hoofer) are rare. Hart is a poor distributer and as Jamie Carragher recently said he should have been working on that in the time since they knew who was coming in. But most of the flack being thrown at him here is poor. He is noticeably better than Mignolet and a lot of others around in the EPL. He also uses his size in a way that Mignolet, who is slightly taller, simply doesn't.

Now for the record, I don't think Liverpool should sign him.

Karius has been signed, he is an investment who is actually in the same position Hart was in, a guy who has developed to a good standard very early (check out his and Hart's age/ playing profiles) and the last thing we should be doing is not playing him because the club has signed a 29 year old highly experienced, highly successful international keeper. I also think if Liverpool do what other teams have done and invest in a young keeper and accept he will make mistakes, it could lead to a decade of having a top keeper. Don't stunt that.

I also believe that had Butland not got injured he would have 1. pushed Hart harder in the summer and 2. almost certainly have been brought in after the Wales game. Which would not have hurt either of them. But Hart would be a big step up from Mignolet.

One last comment because I made a comment about De Gea using his feet too much that was completely misunderstood. All keepers should be able to save with their feet when the occasion demands, that isn't what I'm referring to. What I'm talk about is a good keeper isn't still just sticking his foot out at pretty much anything close to his sides rather than looking to use his hands whenever possible. I've watched a lot of keepers over the past 4 years with my son, United have been lucky not to concede far more goals where he goes with his feet and misses (because it wasn't the right choice) or because you can't generate power by sticking your leg out just deflects the ball into the surrounding area opening up a rebound chance. Hence the reason I've heard full time GK coaches shouting at kids "oi De Gea use your hands".

Anyway sorry for the long rant but having had an insight into goalkeeping over the last few years (and more aspects/ levels of it than I've mentioned here) it really annoys me that people apply such double standards to how they rate players and are always quick to kick the keeper in spite of evidence in front of them of what is in front of the keeper.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - sorry but if you are going to go with that nonsense about his peers, then you are wasting everyone's time with crap. I couldn't be arsed to read this, because anyone who thinks a guy with poor positioning, who constantly flaps at shots he should save easily, is any good, has not got a clue. Hart is an average goalie. Buffon has said nice things in the past about a lot of crap keepers, in fact I seen a quote recently, shown to me by a Belgian guy, about Migs which was talking up his quality. It is pointless to mention what their peers say about them, they are not in a position to make honest comments as they are very likely to work with them in the future and it can be awkward. Just ask Andy Townsend about how awkward things can be if you make non-complimentary remarks about a fellow pro you then have to deal with, either on your side or the opposing side, later. His ugly XI caused him a lot of issues during matches when he had to face his choices.}

26 Aug 2016 10:18:03
If you think goalkeepers have it tough, you should see how they were treated in earlier eras, before referees began protecting them.

Keepers have the most longevity, and the least injuries of any position in football. So in that sense, it is certainly not the riskiest position.

Keepers are most in danger from their own players. See our very own Karius. This happens when a defence is poorly organised. A goalkeeper who knows how to organize a defence and communicate well will put himself at less risk.

All in all, your rant is unconvincing, and does nothing to undermine the original point:Joe Hart is overrated because he is English.

Man City now have the coach with the stature to act accordinlgly.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Aug 2016 10:28:37
Ed001 I don't expect everyone to agree about Hart, he does polarise debate. I also don't have an issue with your comments about peers, I know exactly where you are coming from about not saying bad things. I was quoting Buffon because I haven't seen him play up truly crap keepers and he has to my knowledge no cross over gains from praising Hart.

Positioning is an interesting one and I know what you mean about the quality of save being influenced. I've seen a lot of it all levels where the keeper makes what looks a spectacular (for the fans) save that would have been straight forward if their positioning was better. I've also seen at age levels people raving about the wrong keeper because they can't see that the better keeper was the one who didn't keep getting himself into a mess, that he had to do something spectacular to bail himself out of.

But then positioning also isn't about where they are for that one isolated second so it can be a lot harder to blame a keeper for being in a poor position for one shot if that is because of where he has had to be before that. Just my opinion but Hart gets his positioning decent more often than not - Mignolet for me is maybe break even (trying not to be unfair here) . Hence I don't agree with the view Hart is worse than him. Not least because he is still making those bail out saves when he is in the wrong place. My main point though was that what slack people cut a forward (he has to be there to miss and you only worry when he isn't there at all) they don't cut a goalkeeper - e. g. he may not get his positioning right but he is still making the saves, when you worry is when the positioning isn't great and the bail out saves aren't happening either. And I have no expectation other than people will now say that is totally different.

I don't expect to agree with people here about Hart, I'm not an England supporter so have no vested interest in him, I just don't rate him as low as the rest of you. It is opinion. I've said before he's on the lower fringes of the top group n the EPL and that is my opinion. In terms of what is available in the EPL Liverpool would struggle to find someone better available to buy. Personally I'm coming round more to the view that if you're buying below the top level of player experience in the EPL counts a lot considering how many players fail to settle. I also said I wouldn't suggest Liverpool should buy him unless Karius is totally crocked. I'd rather see Karius given the time to develop from what is a pretty good standing for a 21 year old. The key thing being people don't jump on his back over every mistake. I don't rate De Gea as highly as others but I do recognise he is in that top group and one reason he is there is because at the same age as Karius he had a manager who said he was going to persevere with him even though at times he was woeful.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I think you are missing the point, Hart concedes too many because his positioning is poor and he very rarely makes simple saves. When he does, then the media is full on about him being some kind of superstar for parrying a bunch of shots hit at him. He is average, yes better than Migs, but he is utter dross. Hart is not good enough for the Prem and has been very lucky to have the career he has, purely because he had great potential at one stage and is English.}

23 Aug 2016 22:12:42
Fenerbahce nearing deal with Liverpool's Luis Alberto
Source Telegraph.

Believable10 Unbelievable4

22 Aug 2016 13:05:28
Tiago Ilori will sign for Olympiakos. Fee in the region of 5m euros.

Believable18 Unbelievable16

22 Aug 2016 13:44:32
Really? If so its a decent price for the boy. I hope he can go on be successful with them. He did try hard for us and was given decent chance to show his skills.

Agree7 Disagree23

22 Aug 2016 14:26:23
So have we made money or broken even from him? If this sale is fact, we signed him for €7m, sell for €5m and inbetween acquired loan fees. I think Villa paid €2m for last seals didn't they? Even cut in half sounds like he has cost us nothing.

Agree2 Disagree20

22 Aug 2016 14:49:01
Who cares about money. The lad had his career hindered with us let him move on to where he can play and try recover his career. Sick of young players being bought with no long term plan he never got a look in for the first team.

Agree49 Disagree7

22 Aug 2016 14:56:57
Max Renn, what about agent's fees? Wages that weren't covered by loans? We most certainly have not made money or broke even. Let's not also forget the fact we borderline ruined a young players career.

Agree21 Disagree6

22 Aug 2016 15:05:42

3 games? Absokutely shocking. Even un those few games i thought he showed a lot of promise.

Agree23 Disagree3

22 Aug 2016 15:25:20
There is a reason he didn't make it and if he were good enough, he'd have played. Did he play at Villla? He just wasn't as good as we were led to believe.

Agree3 Disagree3

{Ed001's Note - that is not always true. There have been many players who have been good enough who don't get a chance. Speaking of which, good to see Suso starting for Milan.}

22 Aug 2016 15:40:50
Suso is the one. Remember when Serling and him broke through. Maybe would have been better giving Suso more time than that little s, ;? t.
Suso could be world class. Thank Brendan.

Agree14 Disagree10

22 Aug 2016 18:51:04
When he had his chance he was overweight and slow.

Agree4 Disagree8

22 Aug 2016 19:17:06
AR ay come on max lad.

He played against villa and that's it? That's enough chances. Bloody hell.

Really hope the academy players don't read this. They will be devastated.

And he did look unspectacular against villa but still solid, good compusure on the ball and fast. Just needs games and confidence. Something I thought klopp would of gave him.

Agree5 Disagree1

22 Aug 2016 20:04:45
There's so many posts about how the youngsters should play more. Not all the youngsters are going to make it to be the standard required. Liverpool have probably given more chances to youngsters than most of the other top 10 teams in England. Ilori and suso are 2 of many who had chances to shine in 1st team games and training but unfortunately just aren't good enough. Everyone likes it when an academy player makes it like fowler, Gerrard and carragher but not everyone will.

Agree2 Disagree5

{Ed001's Note - so not true, neither had enough chances in the 1st team, certainly not Suso who did shine on those rare chances he got. It takes years of regular football to develop, not 2 or 3 games. You are talking crap. Carragher was the target of the boo boys for years and was seen as a flop by a large number of fans in his early years. It took him years to develop into the mainstay of the backline that he became.}

22 Aug 2016 20:18:31
To be fair it's not like our defence has been leaking goals for the last three years and all our centre backs have been so consistent.

Agree2 Disagree0

22 Aug 2016 21:36:41
Out of all ilori got the least chances. What was it 2 years to get a start after taking him away from his home, a starting position in a very good team, shipped out on numerous pointless loans.

Then he gets what was it 3/ 4 games, one when he hadn't played for 6 months and was dead on his fit at 60 minutes.

Nowhere near enough and there is noone who can say any different with evidence that he got enough chances.

Shame, but glad he's going somewhere he will play

Btw noone is saying he is our savior, it going to be a world class centre half, just how young he is and how little games he has had. Look at players at Dortmund (ginter), Everton, Tottenham (Kane, diet, Ali), athletico, Southampton. You need to give a young player a real good run, if ilori had of had 10/ 15 games ina row and not shown any signs, it still wouldn't of been enough but at least it would of been much better than this.

Agree3 Disagree0

22 Aug 2016 21:56:09
well said edd01 suso always looked liked he could be a top player to me. And Ilori could not play any worse than skrtel. I can remember Carragher playing right back and every time he got in to a crossing position passing the ball back. Is that his fault or manager playing him out of position.

Agree3 Disagree1

22 Aug 2016 22:48:21
Carraghers 2 own goals against United.

The only time I really swore at him :-)

Agree2 Disagree0

22 Aug 2016 23:29:37
Teixeira didn't get a fair shot either IMO.

Agree11 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - defo, if any player looked like he deserved more time it was him.}

23 Aug 2016 01:05:39
Good luck to Ilori, hope he wins the Europa with them.

Agree4 Disagree0

23 Aug 2016 07:51:31
We have wasted several potential world class youngsters over the last few years. Tiago Ilori, Joao Texeira and Suso by not giving them enough game time to grow.

Agree6 Disagree4

23 Aug 2016 12:34:10
If we gave all the youngsters 2 years to settle in, at least after 2 years they would hopefully be good enough to get us back out of the championship. All these young players Liverpool have not given a chance to in the past have gone on to other clubs and how many have become world beaters?

Agree0 Disagree6

{Ed001's Note - for gods sake this stupid comeback again. That is the most ridiculous way of judging whether a player could have been good enough if they had not had their way blocked in their formative years. The time when they usually make the most progress, but they can't do so when they are not getting first team football.}

23 Aug 2016 16:43:38
Ed1, you are pretty quick to accuse posters of talking rubbish but that is just your opinion. The posters are entitled to their opinions as well. Personally I am pleased to see Suso has improved and is doing o. k. but I do not think he would improve a top 6 EPL team and Teeira showed soe great flashes of form but went missing for long periods Illori? we shall see. I had high hopes for him, quick and skilful but an EPL CB? not so sure. Just my opinion of course :-)

Agree4 Disagree3

23 Aug 2016 16:46:55
Tex, Suso and Illori 3 world class players? Ridiculous.

Agree2 Disagree4

23 Aug 2016 17:31:39
CR I don't think the argument is about their quality but more about the fact we don't give our youngsters time and chances to prove themselves. A game every now and then isn't going to prove anything. They need a good run just the same as any new signing, possibly more so because of their age. You have to accept that there is going to be bad games and inconsistencies because of their age and lack of experience. Talent needs to be developed.

Agree1 Disagree0

23 Aug 2016 19:09:46
CR - Texeira went missing for long periods? When did he get 'long periods' in which to go missing!? 2 EPL appearances. that's all he got. It may be 'your opinion' but facts still speak for themselves, which makes 'your opinion' a load of old codswallop!

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - Teixeira looked a diamond whenever he played.}

24 Aug 2016 00:11:28
I think this is the Coach having all the power vs having director of football and a coach argument. Coaches always look out for themselves and take the safest option, add the premier league spending power, they always choose the buy a safe option instead of being given a team and being told to actually coach, teach and develop talent. You can tell when a coach is over his head, he stops coaching and becomes the manager, tried to outwit everyone, ironically, best managers never stop coaching and teaching. In the end, it's the young players that suffer by sitting on the bench.

Agree2 Disagree1

24 Aug 2016 07:45:54
Those players may or may not have been better than we know. Sometimes players simply don't get enough time in the first team.
Look at Villa playing Lescott and Richards over Okore.
De Bruyne or Lukaku not getting time to develop at Chelsea.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Aug 2016 07:48:43
Football is about opinions. If we all had the same opinion football and this website wouldn't be what it is. I do agree with some of your point about giving youngsters a chance but with fans, owners wanting immediate success and managers futures riding on a few months performances. In my opinion you'll see less youngsters being given long runs of matches in the first team as the managers job is on the line. I'd like to see the likes of Arnold and brannigan given a run in the team. Maybe it's up to the club's to make changes to the u23 to make it more competitive and worthwhile?

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Aug 2016 13:17:55
I just hope these guys don't end up like Pique or Pogba. Miss the potential of them, move them on and turn top notch.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Aug 2016 17:14:29
Edd001 think of what texeria could have become with lallanas game time.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - exactly mate, he really looked a special talent that lad.}

23 Aug 2016 22:11:17
Ironic selling Ilori just a few days after our lack of pace in defence was so badly exposed.

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Aug 2016 08:29:22
hope Ojo gets enough chances.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Aug 2016 09:28:32
Was interesting to see about Teixeira that in spite of being on loan, in spite of not playing a full season with them the Brighton fans loved the guy. Considering most fans look at a player loaned in from EPL club and think he'd better be seriously special or else he must have been doing something right.

Agree0 Disagree0

Mobile version of this site: Liverpool Rumours Mobile

Football Transfer Rumours

Liverpool Rumours 2

Liverpool Rumours 3

Liverpool Rumours Archives

Football Rumours


Posting / Reply Form

To post you must be logged in with a username. Please Log In or Register for a username.






Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass