Liverpool Rumours Member Posts


Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

Paypal single or recurring donation

(single word yields best result)
Ed046 is placing football tips on our Bets site

Sirshanks's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



Sirshanks's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Sirshanks's Posts



To Sirshanks's last 5 banter posts


To Sirshanks's last 5 rumour replies


To Sirshanks's last 5 banter replies


Sirshanks has no Rumours Posts



Sirshanks's banter posts with other poster's replies to Sirshanks's banter posts


04 Jun 2018 20:20:51
If Brandt is selected over Sane after the season he has just had. then bloody sign him up.


1.) 04 Jun 2018 20:35:15
Always thought France would win the World Cup but not sure now if Germany can leave sane out 😡😡.

2.) 04 Jun 2018 21:51:41
France would never win anything with Deschamps. Shame! the best squad in WC. Similar to Belgium. The best lot in the world managed by Martinez πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚.



16 Mar 2018 23:21:32
Lots of comments on the draw. for me it's the worst draw with the away leg last. But forget the comparisons in the league, this is a 2 leg tie with away goal rule. 0-0 isn't a bad result at home!

But it's a nice problem to have, the 300 million is not enough brigade can only dream of our problem!




23 Sep 2017 20:36:55
Uncanny or fate? That top 5 is what I expected the top 5 to be at season end.

City or utd 1st n 2nd and us or Spurs 4th n 5th sandwiching Chelsea!

Let's hope one team moves position eh!

Who says money doesn't talk?!


1.) 23 Sep 2017 21:07:14
A think we will finish in top 4 i agree with ed01 if we get vvd in jan and put joe along side him and trent at right back with either ward or karius in goal will see us in good stead to be in champs league agen next yr.

2.) 23 Sep 2017 21:59:59
Utd spent 400m the last too summers as for city? U reap wat u sow some say!

3.) 23 Sep 2017 22:04:56
We'll see at the end of the season,
It may be the
"Sirshanks redemption"

4.) 23 Sep 2017 22:20:49
Sirshanks redemption suggests we have a recovery to make?! @! But I like it.! We will be inconsistent until the season end but that is our only chance of competing for the too 4 so I'm all for it.

5.) 23 Sep 2017 23:20:00
The whole 9 yards Sirshanks, that's LFC,



15 Jan 2017 20:49:48
Overall given the loss of the 2 defenders before the match, a point is a good one.
Remember, this talented, expensively assembled squad we played against are on a hot run. They are playing without the hindrance of the offside rule, yet they are still unable to beat us! If these decisions even themselves out. then bring it in!


1.) 15 Jan 2017 22:11:32
I'd have settled for a point before the game to be honest. But, with not long left when they scored, it was tough to take, though probably a fair result in the end. They wasted a couple of chances, mainly from our mistakes, and we had just a few chances that were off target or straight at De Gea.

Migs was very good, as was Hendo. Apart from some great technique for the goal, Zlatan was quiet and Pogba should be buying a round for the entire crowd after that performance given what he cost (yes, it does matter what he cost if you're scraping the cash to afford to watch and he performs like that. )

2.) 15 Jan 2017 23:34:10
Playing without the hindrance of the offside trap πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

3.) 16 Jan 2017 04:48:43
W/ O the linesman`s decision (which is beginning to wind me up, these ref decisions that Utd seem to have been getting), we prolly would have won cos they were getting disjointed and desperate especially if you bring on Fellaini as a battering ram. If hoofball is all the "greatest manager in the world" has to offer us with the most expensive squad in PL history, then I fear for him and his bunch of millionaires.



03 Jan 2017 18:58:04
Eds, any truth in the article of Matip having to report to Cameroon camp next week? and the possible consequences should he not? Thanks.


{Ed002's Note - This was dealt with weeks ago - they "expect" him although he has said he isn't going, they will bleat about it, nothing will happen (at least not without a court case).}

1.) 03 Jan 2017 19:25:42
Am I correct in saying if the player doesn't want to represent his country then there's nothing that can force him?
At least he didn't do a Stephen Ireland.

{Ed002's Note - That is generally correct - unless he (or the club) uses an imaginary an injury as an excuse.}

2.) 03 Jan 2017 20:09:51
Matip is injured and hasn't played for Liverpool for a number of weeks, so I really think they are clutching at straws.

3.) 03 Jan 2017 20:58:58
They are just posturing for the sake of it. Nothing will happen and they themselves, know it.

4.) 03 Jan 2017 21:13:31
I think half of it is the media making nonsense out of nothing as per usual, but what do I know.

5.) 03 Jan 2017 22:48:51
I thought they could stop him playing for his club for the length of time the national team is still in the competition.

But maybe with Matip having been out injured for a number of weeks it may be different.

6.) 03 Jan 2017 23:30:30
They can't do a thing and they know it especially if the player refused to go or especially if it is injured.

7.) 04 Jan 2017 08:57:37
If you could be forced to represent a country then logically players like Zaha would have no choice who they play for - the first country with a claim could call them up and they would have to be tied in there forever.




Sirshanks's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

14 Oct 2020 20:45:07
Well said juicer. This is another example of clubs self preservation during this period. However unpopular this latest effort, its more evidence of how far removed the clubs are from reality. But you shouldn't be afraid to point out that liverpool are one of a number of clubs to demonstrate this. despite the rather monotonous assertions of one particularly bitter individual.




Click To View This Thread

21 Nov 2017 14:39:39
Ed, are the earlier rumours true from the summer about lfc asking for 150m for Couts true or was it a case of them wanting to secure a replacement 1st?


{Ed002's Note - Liverpool had a price for the player and it was not met - we spent the summer dealing with this.}



Click To View This Thread

05 Aug 2017 18:14:16
So your happy to accept that Coutinho will be leaving even though no deal has been agreed, whilst at the same time stating we are not going to improve our team because erm. . no deal has been agreed?! get a grip and pick up the dummy! If your right I'll pick up mine!
You do realise that we are never going to spend the amounts of money that chelsea n the Manchester clubs will.




Click To View This Thread

05 Aug 2017 00:05:34
Lallana injury is a blow but let's not forget that his spot is being taken by Couts this year.




Click To View This Thread

16 Jul 2017 17:23:32
Mk, I have to say I do like some of your posts, but I'm not with you on this.

You say we should make space for Solanke because he needs game time to improve.

That space should be made by getting rid of a young lad who needs game time to improve!

I can't understand that logic? Why Solanke over Origi?

What happens in 2 years or so when we bring in another youngster. do we get rid of Solanke because the new lad needs game time?

As for Klopps promises. I'm sure he tells every new signing that they will get game time if they perform well enough. I would expect any manager to do the same. If they don't perform then they don't play. That isn't always the managers fault. it's generally the players.

Besides. Solanke wasnt promised any regular 1st team footy when the Liverpool spoke to him last Xmas and persuaded him to come to us!





Sirshanks's banter replies


Click To View This Thread

17 Oct 2020 21:58:48
Thanks ed25 for not abusing those with a different opinion to yourself. Its a refreshing change on here from some of those others in power! Id have taken a point today before the game and still satisfied with it. I agree that opinion on tackles are subjective. and that's maybe im more miffed with the offside. that's not just a tight decision that goes either way. he has manipulated technology! Unfortunately for him and us. its clear for all to see.




Click To View This Thread

17 Oct 2020 19:27:55
Ed, i don't mind that comment if your not bringing that to print to excuse some of your tackles. Mane got booked for high feet when digne also had high feet and rolled around. Mane was fouled. but you reference his rolling around without the slightest mention of james. Who was embarrassing and waved imaginary cards. It smacks of blinkered hypocrisy. Robbo has rather annoyingly got that petulant side to his game and i think he should have been booked. but the richarlison tackle was dangerous in comparison. I just think it was a poor comparison. I often value your opinion, but not todayπŸ‘.


{Ed025's Note - i make no excuses for james shanks and i have already decried it on this thread, tackles are subjective im afraid mate and the severity depends on who you support i suppose..



Click To View This Thread

17 Oct 2020 18:01:48
Robertsons kick not far off Richarlisons tackle. i know its all about opinions but that is laughable. You often refer to tinted glasses but i think you may have yours on with the criticism of mane. given that it was a foul. and he didn't spend half the time rolling round as James.


{Ed025's Note - but he did roll shanks and grabbed his head like he had been butted by big dunc, thats just plain cheating, what im saying is your lot are not exactly whiter than white mate when it comes to bending the rules mate...wake up and smell the roses..



Click To View This Thread

05 Apr 2020 09:15:12
I was trying to get some context to the percentage cost of non player staff wages in comparison to the overall picture.




Click To View This Thread

05 Apr 2020 00:01:56
Absolutely disgusted with LFC. You are a disgrace taking money that is meant for those that need it most. Can i ask a question. how much is the wages of the non playing staff? Do you think it could be payed by the club?


{Ed002's Note - Why are other people’s wages of any interest to you? We are not going to get in to such conversations.}