Liverpool Rumours Member Posts

 

hhanif005's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded



hhanif005's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To hhanif005's Posts

 

 

To hhanif005's last 5 banter posts

 

To hhanif005's last 5 rumour replies

 

To hhanif005's last 5 banter replies

 

hhanif005 has no Rumours Posts

 

 

hhanif005's banter posts with other poster's replies to hhanif005's banter posts

 

04 Oct 2023 04:39:03
Hit send accidentally.

Would VAR not bring the game back in that scenario? Surely it's happened a few times in the last 5 years. And in that time if they haven't addressed the laws or protocols then they are unfit to manage this process.

hhanif005

 

 

04 Oct 2023 04:36:15
Hate to dwell on this, but I think there is something seriously wrong with the expansion that the laws of the game prevented VAR from halting the game 10 seconds later.

Imagine a scenario where VAR was awake and gave the right decision, but for whatever reason the onfield referee misunderstood and gave the incorrect instruction.

hhanif005

1.) 04 Oct 2023 06:27:37
I don't think spurts would have had too much of an argument for the game being stopped and the goal awarded versus the argument we have on what actually happened. No question that the VAR idiots (lightly) should have blown off protocol and stopped the game. It's potentially a decision that could cost LFC tens of millions of pounds down the road. If it does then I hope the club sue the PL. Should have done the same when we lost the league by a point 2 years ago.


2.) 04 Oct 2023 10:55:12
Indeed, Redflyer. The only people that would have had a problem with it in the long run, would be the VAR guys for being exposed for their incompetence and dereliction of duty, as the audio has shown. They could have called the play back due to this being an unprecedented situation BUT chose not to in order to cover their arses.

Absolute spineless cowards. Walk around the Football pitch like Kings yet when it is time to stand up and take responsibility, they hide behind "protocols", the ones they break all the time.


 

 

19 Mar 2021 11:26:46
Seems like Man City will have to beat Dortmund and one of PSG and Bayern to get the honour of playing us in the final.

All the conspiracy and moaning around draws has been put to rest!

hhanif005

{Ed077's Note - surely you mean the honour of losing to You guys in the final.}


1.) 19 Mar 2021 11:33:26
Not a bad draw really, there are some tough teams left in but on our day we can beat anyone let's do it . YNWA.


2.) 19 Mar 2021 12:18:14
Yes Ed077 agreed.


 

 

25 Jan 2021 12:34:28
I feel a little more positive after last night's game. We scored two great goals and conceded 3 stupid, totally avoidable ones. But conceding to stupid mistakes, right now, seems a bit better than conceding to bad luck. Although I must say Utd were really sluggish for parts of the game and Maguire was having a shocker, so we should have really punished them.

Three things I took away from the game.

1. It was good to see some fluency return to our play further up the field. If we had two imposing CBs, we would have won that game easily.

2. Thiago shows class but it would have been much better if we had a full squad with Fab and Hendo available to play in the midfield, which would have allowed Klopp to bed Thiago into our way of playing rather than being thrust into the first team straightaway. He is a magical player but he gives the ball away in dangerous areas-something our strongest midfield setup rarely did.

3. The club should seriously think about getting a CB in this window, even if on loan. If we can get Hendo and Fab playing in the midfield alongside Thiago, the 6 point gap at the top of the table will be crushed in no time. I have no idea who we can bring, but we desperately need an urgent solution.

hhanif005

1.) 25 Jan 2021 14:40:36
We've had 25 days to get a CB, so I don't expect one in the last 6 days of this window, which is very disappointing from the owners.


2.) 25 Jan 2021 14:43:21
A poster on our page made a very good point. Thiago is pure class and clearly a wonderful footballer, but he slows everything down and much of your success has been built on high speed, and energy pressing and passing. So good as he is, does he fit in your team? The evidence suggests not.

{Ed001's Note - it is not true. He does not slow the play down at all, absolute bunkem from pundits with no insight. The problem is that he can't defend and he is playing a defensive role. He is constantly looking to move the ball quickly forward.}


3.) 25 Jan 2021 14:53:37
OP, I too felt a bit positive and your pos. points are more than valid. As for Utd, this is why they don't come out and play vs the big boys or vs anyone period. They get absolutely battered in terms of play cos they have no fluid system.

We were above average at best and nowhere near our standards yet could have won the game and some of our play was actually nice to watch. This is where they will fail, IMO.

As for us, I loved seeing Salah make those penetrating runs and took his goals very well. Low on confidence? Did not look like it. Bobbie also showed flashes of his brilliant self with those tricks vision and link up play that opened Utd up for the two goals. Something we can defo. build on. As for mistakes, Williams needs to learn and learn quickly cos he keeps making the same mistake multiple time. That simply won't fly and Trent is struggling mightily. On to Spurs.


4.) 25 Jan 2021 22:56:09
What is with all this Thiago bashing. He had had C.V. and an injury and is trying to settle into a new time which is disjointed with injuries. He is also playing a defensive role which is not best suited to him. He has not been sensational, but he has shown his ability and class in glimpses. The problem is VVD, Gomez and Matio are out, so the midfield is lacking its bite with the absence of hendo and Fabinho.
Also, he didn’t duck it looked like he tried to get his head on it, but I haven’t watched it back so might be wrong.

{Ed0666's Note - you cannot argue with stupid Todd it’s a fact of life.


5.) 26 Jan 2021 09:28:33
Man of todd, it is just people seeking an agenda. I read on SM a poster said Klopp made a mistake in signing Thiago instead of focusing on a CB. Like the Ed said, you cannot argue with these types of people. They will always drag your level of intelligence down a couple of notches.


 

 

17 Sep 2020 10:00:10
Question for Ed002, please. Sorry if this has been addressed already.

There is news that the rebate from the clubs for the TV deal due to CV19 is c. £300m, albeit it due after next season. What is the justification for this rebate given that the competitions were completed - and not just completed but more of the games were aired on the TV so potentially a chunk of supporters who would never pay for BT or Sky packages may have been persuaded to purchase them this year?

hhanif005

{Ed002's Note - They incurred considerably more costs. THis is rather old news and was dealt with a couple of months ago.}


 

 

 

hhanif005's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

14 Aug 2023 18:55:58
We already need to give Kelleher game time, and I am sure Chelsea will offer to pay over a 10 year period and that would guarantee us income for the next 10 years so it's a win-win.

hhanif005

 

 

Click To View This Thread

13 Aug 2023 01:52:15
Contract length is not restricted, but using extremely long contracts as a ploy to work around FFP is rooted out by stipulating that costs of purchases are recognised in financial accounts over no more than 5 years.

In typical accounting the cost of something is recognised over its useful life (e. g. cost of a 20k car which lasts 10 years is 2k per year) . Longer the useful life, smaller the per-year cost. UEFA have cracked down on spreading the cost of *transfers* over more than 5 years so to not artificially lower the per-year cost of transfers. Contracts can be as long as you want.

hhanif005

 

 

Click To View This Thread

15 Jul 2023 08:00:52
One would think they are valuing Hendo at 700k per week so he's worth 72m over two years to them, so they should have no problem coughing up 30m or 40m in transfer fees for LFC to end his 2 year contract.

But no. That 700k is a straight up bribe. ?.

hhanif005

 

 

Click To View This Thread

12 Nov 2022 17:16:17
Hope we can find another Divock Origi.

hhanif005

 

 

Click To View This Thread

22 Jul 2022 16:40:25
Thanks for the info.

hhanif005

 

 

 

hhanif005's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

10 Feb 2024 01:10:05
Sounds like a bonkers idea to me.
To my understanding currently only the ref keeps the time in football. How will the ref keep track of multiple people going off after one or two minute intervals?

I would much rather prefer that an orange card is given which counts as 2 yellow cards towards the 10 yellow cards a player can collect before they serve a mandatory two match suspension in the season.

hhanif005

 

 

Click To View This Thread

25 Jan 2024 18:16:24
I once heard Paul Scholes speak and the next thing I remember is waking up the next morning. Not sure if it was a dream.

hhanif005

 

 

Click To View This Thread

15 Jan 2024 18:27:24
I thought it was quite common for businesses to get short term corporate finance to pay dues. I would imagine in the football business it would be all the more likely as the earnings from the league finish, broadcast revenue, player sales and season tickets etc come in all at once. I didn't mention any tournament winnings because don't think there is any chance of any of that coming in ?.

hhanif005

 

 

Click To View This Thread

30 Dec 2023 15:51:07
I think it's a good time for the club to liquidate its assets and turn Anfield into a museum. All things come to an end. It's good to end when you are at a (relative) high. Fans will remember and cherish the Community Shield win for the next two hundred weeks.

hhanif005

 

 

Click To View This Thread

17 Nov 2023 03:57:07
Have to disagree Stoneage. VAR is terrible right now, but it would be much worse if it missed more incidents than it misses currently, and was more haphazard than it is currently, and led to more errors because there was nobody in charge of looking and relooking at all incidents on the screen as a dedicated additional pair of eyes.

All the problems with VAR right now are personnel problems. The logic of it and the technology is absolutely fine. In fact VAR has now created an expectation in fans that incidents won't be missed and decisions will be accurate, so reverting to a less technologically comprehensive solution now will be completely rejegted by the fans.

hhanif005

 

 





Change Consent