Liverpool Banter Archive December 12 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

12 Dec 2014 22:42:25
Any update on sturridge? How long before he is back in full training

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - He won't be available to play until January sometime.}

12 Dec 2014 23:10:10
Back in Training around January. Should pick up another injury around then and be out till March. He'll send out a few more tweets and Instagram photos then probably get another pay rise making him the most wealthy piece of tracing paper that ever lived

Agree15 Disagree1

13 Dec 2014 08:13:42
There is every chance of Sturridge to pick up another injury.

Agree4 Disagree0

13 Dec 2014 11:46:36
Thats what really irritates me about the summer business and the transfer committee.
They know Sturridge is a dead cert to have at least ten games out each season injured, and sometimes even more. Add in the time taken to get match sharpness back etc, and you can count on not having him fully fit for at least a third of the season. Its just what happens in most seasons.

They knew all this, and they still expected to challenge for the title with a strike force of balotelli, lambert and borini for a third of the season- or possibly half a season, as it turned out this time?

Whoever thought that was a sound plan was a complete person. It was a totally unrealistic gamble, probably based on balotelli playing to a league winning standard as a lone striker.

They gambled on signing a marquee name as Ed002 said they might, and its ended in tears as he said it would.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 22:07:10
What do you guys think of Sterling these days then? I think he does need a rest but also he needs to be dropped because he isn't justifying a place. Please don't tell me that he is just young and obviously will be inconsistent, I already know that. It doesn't mean he shouldn't be dropped to give someone else chance. Personally I would accept a fat offer from Madrid and get rid of him if he is being so greedy, he can bear the fruits of his greed and become an average player due to lack of game time If he wants to. He is not THAT good, we need money, we have Ibe, Ojo, and Wilson all with great potential too.

To sum up:

-Selling Sterling wouldn't be all that bad
-Sterling is not THAT good, not indispensable

Please note I don't want him to leave because I know he can become great for us. But I want to know: would you sell him if Madrid made a big money offer?

Thoughts everyone?

Believable3 Unbelievable12

At the moment, I would not take it because history has shown we would waste the money on probably a gaggle of mediocre players who almost instantly get relegated to the bench and eventually to the stands. So, no, as long as the committee stands I wouldn't take it.

Agree8 Disagree0

Sorry but Sterling is an amazing talent that stands out like a sore thumb in our team . He is a player that is improving .

If anything he is being made to look average by the complete lack of options ahead of him .

I do think that people should get of his back . Can you blame him for wanting to leave if he does ?

BR has basically pointed out that he made Raheem what he is, which I doubt went down too well.

Agree9 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 22:59:46
Great talent and potential but needs to work on his finishing, decision making and final ball for me. Superb mazy dribble against Spurs anyone?

Agree4 Disagree0

Great talent yes but his form and work rate is crapy. Even Ibe and Suso are better at beating players, imo Ibe is a better talent he just needs to add finishing to his game.

Sterling see's way to much game time for the form he is in. He won't dramatically have a change around season unless he spends a few games on the sidelines.

Agree1 Disagree1

If sterling doesn't improve in his final ball, finishing and decision making he will turn into arron lennon

Agree6 Disagree0

13 Dec 2014 03:17:32
He may not be firing like last season but he also doesn't have 2 top forwards moving defenders around and creating chances for him / a chance to whip a ball in.

To suggest he's not a top talent is ludicrous. Best talent since. quite possibly gascoinge. The kid can far but he needs nurturing correctly and played in the correct position / style of play.

100% of you were creaming your pants over him last season so stop being muppets and pretending he isn't a top talent. Football fans are fickle, but Christ, stop being complete idiots.

Ibe has potential but to claim he offers more? Ibe is incredibly raw, needs time and not pressure that could potentially ruin him.

Agree4 Disagree0

Sterling is still very young and has a lot of learning and developing still to do - he is still one of, if not the, brightest prospects at his age. He should not be sold under any circumstances.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sterling will continue to underperform for as long as he is played on the wing. Get him in the centre and you'll see the Sterling that slaughtered Spurs earlier in the season.

Would I sell him to Madrid? To be honest I would but only if we got Isco as part of the deal because I think he has more potential anyway. As somebody said above though, the current set up cannot be trusted to adequately replace him so it's not worth the risk.

I have always maintained that Ibe will become the better player. Scarily though it looks like Ojo is better than both of them. Having said that, imagine a front 3 of Ojo, Sturridge and Ibe with Sterling in behind them.

That is a scary amount of pace! Now we just need a time macine to jumo forward two years so They're all ready for consistent game time!

Agree3 Disagree1

The problem is EMS is that we have both Coutinho and Lallana who can also play there meaning too many players a for one position. If you look at Sterlings skill set there is no reason why he cannot play on the wing - I am not arguing that it is his best position, but that he should be more than capable of putting in a performance there, he did do numerous times last season. Sterling isn't enjoying a great run of form but neither is most of the team - I don't think where he is playing on the pitch is having that much impact on his form, there are other more significant reasons.

Agree2 Disagree0

13 Dec 2014 08:12:07
There are plenty of players better than Sterling and that's something the boy should get into his head.
He has potential just like most youngsters have at their early stage of career.
40miill and I would drive him to Madrid.

Agree2 Disagree0

Can't really argue with much of that Seano. Ili agree he does a job out wide. He is a match winner in attacking midfield though.

I think it's affecting his form, but 100% agree with you that there are additional factors to consider.

Agree0 Disagree1

Personally I think he is very overrated. He is a victim of our media hype culture, and is being hyped like crazy by all sides just like Andy Carroll was in the first half of the 2010 season.
Time after time I watch him slow up play by stopping over the ball, make a bad final decision, a weak shot, or a poor final ball, and I wonder what people are seeing in him that lots of other premiership players don't have.
He had a lot of blinding games last season, but that was with top players around him.
My guess would be that if you look closely and specifically at his total end product this season in terms of goals and assists, it will be no better than your average premiership attacking midfielder.
All the running and clever dribbling in the world counts for absolutely nothing if you can't finish or get the ball to the striker.
He's got bags of potential but this season, for me he has been bang average most if the time, and I've been much more impressed by the wingers we've been up against than by our own players.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 22:01:31
Just finished watching Texeira play for Brighton and must say was impressed with his performamce, easily the best player or at least the most creative player on the pitch. He did fade towards the end but he looks like an excellent technical footballer

Believable1 Unbelievable1

There`s a reason we moved heaven and earth to get him after the NextGen game when he made our kids look like babies on the pitch. He`s a gem and he like Suso, Ibe, Origi, Dunn, Yesil, Rossiter, Jones, should be getting games instead of buying players from other academies and leave them rotting in the academy or loaned out.

Agree8 Disagree0

13 Dec 2014 08:15:29
Redohio

Spot on, along with Texiera, keep an eye on Chirevella. The lad would become world class one day.

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 19:23:10
Hi eds,

What do you make of these claims j Henry tried to sack BR but he was swayed by Ian ayre and legends of the club?

Ta

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Twitter is this?}

Its hard to imagine Ayre opposing a sacking move by his boss, in case he ended up getting sacked himself. He does seem to be a bit of a yes man, which in fairness might be essential for a corporate survivor of several years of storms and purges.
Problem with a yes man is he is often scared to give bad news to the bosses even when it important they know the truth, and when he does give bad news its never his fault.
I wonder if he will survive the coming shake up?

Agree4 Disagree0

If JH wants to sack anyone, NOBODY not even legends, can sway him against his wish. BR WILL b sacked, for sure. It`s a matter of when and not if.

Agree4 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 19:20:13
I think I just figured out Rodgers' scouting style. He saw skrtel take that strike that barely missed the top corner. Turned and said "who is that striker let's buy him. Oh we have him? He's our cb? Put him up top!" And all his staff quickly agreed.

Believable14 Unbelievable0

I won`t b surprised if that was the truth

Agree4 Disagree0

It was a grate strike though if it went in he probably would have walked of the pitch and retired

Agree6 Disagree0

Haha it would be a good time for him to do it. I was watching it streaming so it was grainy but I swear I could see him look around shake his and say f--- I've got as good a chance as anyone else on the pitch

Agree2 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 19:16:52
Hey Mr ed 2 I understand that you believe Torres will be player/manager soon. Is there a chance this will be before January as to give him time to work with the squad and then make decisions as to who he might sell or bring In.
Also not that I doubt your knowledge but has Torres passed his exams as my understanding is you have to pass before you can manage. I wonder if he has a special deal in place to allow him to manage whilst taking the exams.
Lastly do you think he will be able to improve our current situation. I know the owners went young in their last appointment of a manger but Torres has really surprised me with his age and experience. I thought we would go with someone older and wiser.
Thanks for all the hard work this year my friend and I hope you enjoy the festive period ahead

Believable0 Unbelievable5

Please tell me you're joking.

(Everyone knows its the legend david ngog who is set to return in the player manager role.)

Agree6 Disagree0

Anonymush just what I gathered from what ed 2 has said. Normally ed 2 is spot on with what he says.
I understand you were just jostling me with ngog comment but i take it you don't see Torres coming. Personally i'd have him back on cheap wages but I believe the managing job is far too early. What's your thoughts my friend.

Agree0 Disagree2

12 Dec 2014 22:11:33
Ed was being sarcastic about Torres

Agree1 Disagree2

12 Dec 2014 22:21:44
I heard it was babel.

Agree0 Disagree0

You are all wrong, they want youth at the helm hence why they will offer it to Jon Flanagan, he has been doing his level 1 & 2 coaching badges whilst out with an "injury"

Agree0 Disagree0

Heard Josemi was first in line for the job

Agree0 Disagree0

You're all wrong it is none other than Ken Aguero

Agree1 Disagree1

13 Dec 2014 11:08:10
Lol, that is actually very funny ;-). Of course you know Ed002 is pulling your leg!

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 18:00:41
So the Eds were correct, Mike Bernard a former FSG employee has confirmed that FSG are in town to lay down the law. Apparently there is a blame game going on between Rodgers and the committee of who is responsible for the summer transfer shambles.

Goodbye Rodgers. Maybe not straight away but he will not be at the club come the start of next season.

Believable8 Unbelievable0

Did you read this somewhere? I'd like to read it if you did

Agree2 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 18:40:21
Twitter bs mate

Agree2 Disagree0

Sooner rather than later.

Other teams have sussed Rodgers style.

On personal level he has also been sussed for his salesman's patter.

Agree1 Disagree0

Google 'Mike Bernard LFC' and it will take you to his twitter account. Yes it is twitter but this guy has John W Henry and Tom Werner plastered on the background of his account so it seems that he is still very close to them.

FSG are pissed, that is for sure.

Agree5 Disagree0

Ok, so was my post was just for rubbishs and giggles. This is yet another hoax twitter account like that of duncanjenkinsfc.

Still does not take away the fact that the Ed's are correct regarding Rodgers being as good as gone.

Agree1 Disagree0

I don't know about FSG's drinking habits and whether they are pissed or not?

They are, however very upset about the £120 million being pissed down the drain.

They are money men and the wasted money has hit them hard.

Agree0 Disagree0

Not only pissed about £120m being flushed down the toilet but also being convinced that they will see LFC win the EPL this season.

Rodgers seems like a very good sales person. Who would not have believed him after almost winning the EPL last season. Then gets a fat amount for transfer and now is trying to cover up the paper trail. FSG have bee fooled once before and have clearly been fooled again. The club will suffer as a result but to get things back on track FSG need to take the broom and sweep clean and hopefully this time round they make the right decisions.

Agree4 Disagree0

BR has messed w/ the wrong people`s money and will pay the supreme price for his disgraceful behavior. An American businessan is the wrong person to mess with when it comes to money. KK knows a thing or two about that. BR will feel Henry`s wrath after being lied to and with BR making promises every man and his dog knows he could never keep, he will be sacked and made to rue the day he messed with FSG.

Agree2 Disagree0

13 Dec 2014 11:07:40
Let's not jump from the seat and wait till Ed002 confirms it.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 17:04:28
Eds fellow reds, read an article earliear about j Henry wanting to sack BR and that his first choice replacement is Simione from athletico Madrid .has anyone one read or heard this .

Believable1 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - Twitter is this? Simeone is likely headed elsewhere.}

FSG do want to sack Rodgers but Diego Simeone cannot even speak English and he is going to cherry pick his next team and doubt LFC is even on his mind.

Agree2 Disagree0

Cited me thinks

Agree1 Disagree0

Simeone`s lack of English is no prob for me. However, he wil have his pick and we ain`t going to b one of them

Agree1 Disagree1

Are we now so poor that a manager like Simeone's to big for us i don't think so, we are Liverpool seems that people are forgetting that .

Agree0 Disagree1

12 Dec 2014 16:44:46
Obviously Liverpool's results have been disappointing, to put it mildly. More worrisome, however, is the quality (or lack thereof) of play, and in particular the massive backslide from last season. In this light, I wonder if Rodgers has been given a timeline to, at the very least, turn the quality of play around. I understand there's a lot of internal questioning at the club, but how far has it gone and when will the plug be pulled on the Rodgers experiment? Are we waiting until a targeted replacement is ready? Waiting until our DoF target is ready and available? Or does Rodgers still have some leash with which he can hang himself with uninspired team selection and insipid play?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

12 Dec 2014 17:15:49
Not so long back, Ed01 confirmed the reason we switched to a control possession way of playing.
We ran out of steam last season and it was decided to switch. I am not completely sure on this.
Ed01, Could you mate?

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - Rodgers decided to switch because of it yes.}

Yes we run out of steam, but I'd have thought buying 7 or 8 players was so that you could carry on playing the football which gave you success

Agree6 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 18:35:48
We ran out of steam in 1 game in which we had zero quality on the bench, this year we have some quality on the bench to say the least. If that's the case Brendan is a bigger div than he looks

Agree2 Disagree0

BR is a stubborn, arrogant an cocky guy w/o the credibility to back it up. He reverts to a slow possession game YET bought players suited to play the high-press, high-energy game. Is that stupidity or rank incompetence or what?

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 16:05:40
just reading about your new belguim star, lille fans booed him off after missing a pen, he's on a goal drought he hasn't scored in 923 min

Believable2 Unbelievable3

Yep and BR was telling us all how the kid was the next thing since slice bread, a month ago.

Undue pressure and expectations have been put on the kid, and posts like yours are a direct result of BR's motormouth problems.

Agree9 Disagree2

Nothing better to do? a) he's 19 so booing him is pretty harsh b) Lille as a team are struggling and haven't won in ~2 months and c) while it wasn't the best pen, it was a decent save

Agree5 Disagree0

Ye that sounds like one of our guys.

Agree6 Disagree0

Who etto who was free, and youse knocked him back, whos sorry now

Agree0 Disagree3

Another 10mill wasted by your football genius

Agree1 Disagree5

Kone ??? Glass houses

Agree5 Disagree0

Roberto, don't get me wrong, I was astonished at how few people recognised what Eto'o still has to offer even at this stage in his career. Check the archives, I suggested him many times.

However, Origi is a 19 year old striker being played out of position on the left wing in a team really struggling. That £10m was an investment for the future. Origi will easily be worth that, although he may never be as good as Rodgers suggested in the summer.

Comparing him to Eto'o is ridiculous though mate. It was an unnecessary signing, but we certainly got potential in Origi. Don't forget, he is only a third of Eto'o's age ;)

Agree3 Disagree2

Eto'o is 33 and hasn't really scored of late after bagging a brace against the mighty burnley. Origi is 19 playing for a struggling team, but getting game, at 19, eto'o was on mallorcas bench and scored 6 goals. a bit of perspective please.

Agree5 Disagree0

Roberto, you are trying to b clever by talking trash BUT lack the ability to pull it off. Origi showed his worth in Brazil where he benched your donkey (who you overpaid for). He missed a pen, who cares? Let it go, bitter, let it go.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 14:46:20
what about tevez, 9 goals this year, plays a lot like suarez, should work with sturridge would not cost a fortune, still only 30, only throwing it out there

Believable8 Unbelievable2

12 Dec 2014 15:42:28
At the point against Basel where we took off Lambert (who didn't touch the ball),,, and had Martin Skrtel upfront,,, I'd say Carlos Tevez would've been a useful player yeah. If he didn't refuse to come on as Sub

Agree0 Disagree0

Or we could have gone for someone similar in playing style like Tevez, Suarez, Aguero or Sanchez; they may not be praised like their South American contemporaries, but they are very effective nevertheless.

Son, Lacazette or yet another South American, Lavezzi, are all similar players.

Agree4 Disagree1

Nah, real AG, going for a similar type of player is exactly what our opposition would have expected us to do. We don't want to be so predictable now do we?

Agree2 Disagree1

Tevez Sturridge Balotelli!!

Agree0 Disagree3

I got slaughtered in the summer for saying we should buy Lacazette or Lavezzi :/

Agree3 Disagree6

12 Dec 2014 19:09:18
Lacazzate is an awesome player and I was backing you Adam, but not lavezzi. He would play wide right where currently lallana is playing.

Agree2 Disagree1

No one slaughtered you from what I remember. People including myself hadn't seen him play I don't think many said he was a bad layer, people simply said they hadn't heard much of him

Agree5 Disagree0

Lacazette was not interested in leaving this yr and made that clear to everyone. HOWEVER, I can say that if we had offered 20m for him or more, Lyon might have paid attention.

Agree1 Disagree0

Not me Adam.
In terms of attacking talent last year that I wanted.
Lacazette, Lavezzi, Konyplanka and Firmino were the most highly rated for me.
I did also want Markovic to be fair.
I also thought Balotelli might be a shrewd bit of business.
That's not working out very well though.
Come on Mario. Pull your finger out lad.
A hatrick tomorrow and all is forgiven:)

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 13:31:04
Is borini injured or just left out the squad? Seems mad that if he was fit he's not even considered!

Believable6 Unbelievable0

He's being left out. Rodgers wants to play with a 4-3-3 and to be honest, Borini just doesn't have the pace or creativity to play out wide or the hold up ability to play through the middle. So where do you put him?

He needs a strike partner and Rodgers won't go back to the diamond for some reason.

Agree1 Disagree9

I think the term you are looking for Fencey is "Brendan'd".

It's ironic that one of the players that genuinely wants to play for the club and prove himself can't get anywhere near the squad even when he is the only other fit senior player available for his position.

Agree4 Disagree0

Why was Borini bought in the first place then?

Agree11 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 14:00:50
Nope, he's been Brendaned.

(Ed002, I hope you don't intend copyrighting that term!).

Agree3 Disagree0

I'm going to go out on a limb and say Borini is probably a better striker than Skrtel, EMS. Do I think he's great? No, but it makes little sense to me to send him on loan where he decently well playing as a winger in a poor Sunderland side and then when he comes back he can't even make the bench when Sturridge and Balotelli are injured and Lambert is on his 4th start after 13 days or something. It makes no sense at all to not at least have him on the bench.

Agree5 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 15:45:34
He's rubbish but so is Lambert and Balotelli. In fairness ALL 3 of them should be left out and some of the kids should get a shot. They've all had games for Liverpool and never looked anything above mediocre

Agree3 Disagree1

Those are dear Brendan questions. I don't know why he isn't getting a chance. I would play him alongside Balotelli or Lambert when we're at home to lesser opposition.

I never said I agree with him being left out. I just explained why. He doesn't suit the formation Rodgers is persisting with.

Agree0 Disagree5

Bodgered !

Rodgers bought Borini.

Agree0 Disagree0

Yuri, stick to the official nomenclature man, the term is "Brendaned".

Agree0 Disagree1

At least borini is mobile.
I'd be sticking lambert and borini up front together

Agree1 Disagree0

In Borini's case, I think it's Brendoned.

Agree0 Disagree0

I prefer Bodgered!! just like he's done to the team!

Agree1 Disagree0

Another buy BR told us would be exciting and who is now an outcast by the same guy who paid 12m to get him. That is the type of stupidity that has gotten him sacked, only a matter of time before that happens

Agree3 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 09:27:38
eds,

Need to ask you on something. Why Emre Can not feature in recent game? I like this lads a lot. Good defensive mid and capable to drive forward to launch attack from center.

Is he still not fully fit? Or BR prefer Allen more.

I think our midfield more solid with Emre Can even when Stevie G not play.

Is Lucas move to Italy, who s likely our target def midfielder?

tqvm.

Believable1 Unbelievable1

12 Dec 2014 13:10:45
Can was bought to replace Lucas, you cannot have 2 DM in the same team.

Agree1 Disagree12

Rodgers is seriously lacking in the manhood department.

For him, it is safer to stick with the same players (Allen, Hendo, Gerrard etc) than it is to take a risk and try something different (Can, Rossiter etc). He is too scared to make the big calls required to be a top manager. Until that changes, he will fail because he is unwilling to drop underperforming star players.

Personally, I really want to see Lucas holding with Can and Sterling ahead of him. Kind of like the Madrid midfield last season where they had Alonso holding (Lucas), Modric getting up and down the pitch (Can) and then Di Maria getting the ball and running at people to put the opposition on the back foot and make things happen (Sterling).

Obviously they don't have Ronaldo, Benzema and Bale ahead of them, but it will give us more mobility in the centre of the park and 3 players who are comfortable on the ball when put under pressure. Something Henderson, Gerrard and Allen don't cope well with. Can and Sterling are both capable of pressing from the front which should hopefully make Lucas and the defences job easier. I'd say Henderson and Coutinho when in form are more than capable of stepping in for Can and Sterling respectively though.

Getting back to your inital question though, I honestly don't know what Rodgers thinks he has to lose because the owners are already loading the gun.

Agree5 Disagree4

A central midfield pairing of Emre Can and Henderson is the way froward IMO.

Agree10 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 14:15:05
@Passion.

Can isn't even remotely the same type of player as Lucas, you could play both of them no problem. He's more in the mould of Henderson or Gerrard when he was in his early 20s. If he was bought to replace Lucas (which is quite possible) it demonstrates how much of a blind spot Rodgers developed around the DM area over the summer.

Agree3 Disagree0

Harry, Can has played left back, centre back, holding midfield, Central midfield, attacking midfield and left midfield. His powerful running, pressing ability, vision, shooting and skill is wasted if you shackle him in a holding role.

I have no doubt he could replace Lucas. I just think it'd be a massive waste of his talents. He could easily play with Lucas because he can play ahead of him. He actually looks better in a box to box role in my opinion.

Agree4 Disagree3

12 Dec 2014 15:47:09
Why did he even buy Can? Why buy Lalana ? Why buy Markovic?
He never plays them anyway.

Agree6 Disagree0

Yep, would agree EMS, he looks a really good midfielder and it annoys me that Can is treated in this way.

Agree4 Disagree0

I wouldn't say can is a pressing player, Stron gon the ball yes, but he doesn't have the pace to be pressing. He's rather lumbered. I don't think playing a DM means you have to be ''shackled'' I actually think Can could learn the defensive role, as you say he's played defense before and looks competent. He could learn that defensive midfield role. When there is room the press, he can rpess, when he is required to be more defensively minded he can sit. Simply naming a role and saying you have to fulfill that role and that role only is rather naive to me.

You will often see matic play up the pitch, as well as mascherano,, schweinsteiger, When the game requires a higher line.

Agree0 Disagree1

Can is actually deceptively fast Bob mate. Watch some of his Leverkusen highlights as he hasn't really been given the opportunity to run at people in Brendans possession game. He isn't Sterling fast, but he is certainly as quick as Gerrard was at that age.

I agree with you though, there are times when holding players push forward and either hold higher up the pitch or even join the attack. I just think Can is wasted in the holding role. He offers a lot going forward and still has the engine and defensive awareness to get back and help out. I really rate him as a box to box player. I wouldn't want him pushed too high up the pitch because I think we'd then be wasting his defensive capabilities abd the physical presence he adds to the middle if the park.

I genuinely thunk we've signed a real Gem in Can. To be honest, he'll turn out class whatever position we mould him in to.

Agree2 Disagree5

Can is a beast of a player and Bayern don`t put a buy back clause on your contract if they don`t think they could need you as they did the same thing for Lahm, Hummels (who refused to go back), Alaba, Kroos and many others. He needs to b played in an effective way to harness his immense talent. N BTW, BR is not going to b that manager because he has shown his ineptitude by bench the poor boy for his "yes men" who have been poor this year.

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 12:44:25
Just been reading the reports about Sterling allegedly turning down his new £70k per week contract offer. Now I'm guessing it's a lot of paper talk but it's this kind of thing which really winds up us mere normal folk!

What Sterling needs to do is either a) go to Madrid at the earliest opportunity if they're really interested and see what he feels about sitting on their bench because he won't walk straight into that team or b) sign what's on the table from Liverpool and knuckle down and actually prove that he is worthy of an even bigger salary or a move to Madrid in a few years team when they need to replace Ronaldo.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Sterling will never replace Ronaldo. He doesn't have the instinctive finishing ability. He would be a perfect replacement for Modric though in attacking midfield. In his only season for us as a winger/wide forward he scored 2 goals and set up 6 in 36 games. In his only season for us in attacking midfield he scored 10 and assited 9 for us in 38 games. So far this season he has 3 goals and 5 assists in 22 games. and two of those goals and two of them assists came in the first 3 games when he was playing a more central role. He is far more productive there. He's just too keen to get involved to play out wide as he just drifts infield. He's actually too good at creating attacks to be wasted out wide.

Anyway, to be honest can you blame him for rejecting £70k when Glen Johnson is sitting pretty on a reported £120k?

Agree1 Disagree7

I've just realised that if you take away the two goals and two assists Sterling got in the first 3 games playing central, he has 1 goal and 3 assists in 19 games out wide; which over a whole season on the wing would equate to 2 goals and 6 assists. Exactly what he posted in his first full season as a winger.

It's weird how accurate stats can be when you have a large enough sample size.

Just to carify i do think that if we persisted with it, Sterling would grow into a good winger. If we play him in attacking midfield though like last season, i think he could genuinely become world class there. I just don't want to see his ability wasted.

Agree4 Disagree7

Modric plays CM these days and I don't see Sterling going to Real to play CM.

What will probably happen IF Raheem goes to Real is that he will be shunted out wide and largely used as a squad player, stunting his progress (keep in mind he is only 20) and in a couple of years, fed up of a lack of playing opportunities, would come back to the PL.

He is better off staying at LFC.

Agree6 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 14:05:06
EMS Sterling was 17 in his first season so obviously his stats will improve as he gets older because he will become a better player. But I agree I don't think he will ever be a top top player because he can't shoot at all. His shooting technique is all wrong. He doesn't get any power in his shots and most of the time ends up slicing it. And if his right foot wasn't bad enough his left foot shooting is even more atrocious

Agree3 Disagree0

Sterling should grow into a striker or attacking midfielder not a winger. He's not Jermaine Pennant. If his finishing gets better over the next few seasons he could easily pop in 10 or more per

Agree2 Disagree0

Sterling played in centre mid in the academy mate. He was bloody good there!

Agree0 Disagree8

No man, Sterling never played CM in a 2-man CM ever for the academy or the reserves.

Agree6 Disagree0

He definitely played CM. I can't remember the formation so I won't claim to. I promise you though he spent a good few months playing there and at QPR it was virtually his main position at times. I don't think he has the finishing ability to be a striker and doesn't cross well enough to be a winger. Running at people, pressing the ball, and short passes are his key strengths for me. His vision and movement is excellent.

Besides, Modric and Rodriguez are not a two man midfield anyway. They play in front of Kroos. Sterling could easily replace either of them in 2/3 years. Neither of them are exactly defensively minded. If you've got a class holding midfielder behind them you can afford to play two creative players. Look at Barca. Busquets does the job so well they can afford to have Rakitic and Iniesta attacking. Then you've got Bayern. Alonso does the job so well they can have Goetze and Thiago attacking. The best teams in the world put technical ability above physical strength in their midfield and then combine the two. City are the same. Fernandinho holds whilst Yaya and Silva attack.

I'd be willing to put my neck on the line and say Sterling will be an attacking midfielder eventually, not a winger or a striker. He just shines there.

Agree2 Disagree9

He was 15 years old at QPR -are you telling me you were watching his developments even then EMS? Somehow I doubt it.

Agree3 Disagree0

How did that sample size work out for balotelli?

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 12:36:20
Hey Eds long time reader, first time posting. I'm afraid i'm going to be one of those "oh no he didn't just ask about Torres did he posts". I saw this morning on sky mind you that he is being offered to English clubs on a free? Are Liverpool interested at all I know the history, and any time people brought him up I understand people getting bored of it but right now the way our team is looking I think he could do a job for us especially on a free (I know his wages may be an issue). They took a gamble on Mario for £16m and with Gerrard in recent weeks playing behind the striker I can't honestly see him doing a worse job than the current forward line. Plus I think Chelsea are really setup to play with a different type of striker which is why he didn't do so well there and going to Italy the whole league is very slow and never suited him in my eyes. But hey probably never going to happen but I thought i'd ask as he seems to be at a price we could afford this Jan. Thanks in advance.

Believable1 Unbelievable3

If he is on a free as alleged, i'd take him back in a blink.

He is still better than what we have by miles and i'm pretty sure he'd be up for playing for us too.

Agree2 Disagree2

I would take Torres back, if a burnt out Lambert and Balotelli are our only options up front. He still has more quality than those two and desperate times call for desperate measures, so yes he would be an improvement on what we currently have.

Agree1 Disagree1

12 Dec 2014 14:21:01
It is indeed no more a risk than Balotelli was, and I reckon he has the capacity to perform better than Balotelli & Borini have so far (although that's hardly saying a lot). But it's still a big risk and why would you take two risks like that in a single season?

Yes, he'll be "free" in terms of transfer fee, but there'll be his wages and signing on fee to consider. He's obviously not in a position to demand top money (unless he fancies putting off any interested clubs staying at Chelsea), but it'll still be a substantial outlay, and need I remind you that we've spent money like it's going out of fashion and really need to be more sensible.

We'd have to sell or at least loan Balotelli in Jan, and not have a lot of other options to start looking at it, imo.

Agree1 Disagree2

Torres is in horrendous form and has been for seasons - I don't care if they gift wrap him he should never step foot on the Anfield turf again and this is just for footballing reasons. I'm not even mentioning all the other stuff prior to his transfer that makes me adamant that he should never be welcomed back.

Agree5 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 10:49:57
Think everyone's a bit disappointed about the result but saw a quote in one of the news sites made by Carragher about their being only 1 world class player in the BPL (aguero obviously) and to be fair I think he is right.

Obviously different ways of viewing world class but I always thought of it as, would their be a place for them in the world XI if you made one only aguero would get in it (suppose if you added a bench courtious and kompany might make it).

Just baffled how with the massive increase in TV revenue for our clubs how they all seem to have gotten worse. I know other teams have massive improved (Real, Barca, Bayern, etc.) but if you took the starting XI of our top clubs from 4 or so years ago they would wipe the floor with our current top teams. Added to this we have seen a big drop in the drop in the quality of english players.

So guess my point why hasn't the increase in TV revenue brought any real improvement to the BPL? Know it is entertaining but starting to see a real loss in quality in the majority of the football played.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

12 Dec 2014 09:14:16
Great debate down the age about Neville and Carragher, initially about punditry but then about how good they were as players. The were some great comments made but as A United fan, I'd like to add a couple.

1. Neither were the most technically gifted but both worked incredibly hard to improve and make the most of what they had allowing them to have long and distinguished careers at top clubs.

2. They sum up what we want in our players - 1 club men who gave their all and were completely committed to our clubs.

I remember the pain on Carragher's face when things were going badly, and after fighting back from a lomg term injury, Neville called it a day after being run ragged against West Brom, that must have been a horrible decision.

When Carragher retired I came n her and paid tribute to him, he may have played for Liverpool but that doesn't stopme appreciating hm as a man' a player, or for what he gave to your club. How much would be give to have players like them available for us this weekend? I guess you have Gerrard, and bizarrely, we have Roooney who despite being from your end, never gives less than 100%.

Final point for EMS, Neville may not have been world class but the injury that took the best part of 2 seasons off him and shortened his career probably cost him joining the 100 cap club and captaining he country.

As for punditry, Neville tells it how it is (sometims a little too directly) but as fans we n our heads when he uses terms we would use. Carragher is settling in and I'm sure will do well. I also don't agree that they hate each other. That may have been the case on the pitch but assuming they are BH decent blokes, that will quickly be forgotten.

Have a good Christmas boys although hopefully not too happy this weekend.

Believable4 Unbelievable0

12 Dec 2014 12:15:01
Thank you for giving your opinions on our site. Nice to here views from other clubs supporters who are not trying to cause trouble

Agree1 Disagree0

You basically said exactly what I said regarding them as players. Not as gifted as others but passionate and do a job. Don't get me wrong, I loved them both as players. Just never considered either to be world class.

I still disagree on the punditry side of things but opinions are always going to differ and I 100% appreciate that you have a differing opinion mate. I never said they hate eachother though, but they just make really good banter that makes good TV. I'm not questioning that they're both great tactical minds. I just think a lot of their analysis is wrong. That's just my opinion and in a lot of people's opinions (clearly) I am wrong. I can accept that though.

Thanks for your post mate, I found it to be a mature and calculated argument.

Agree2 Disagree3

I rated Neville highly as a player, though I was gutted that Rob Jones was made of glass as I thought he was a better defender and better footballer.

Personally, can't be bothered with the Neville hate thing, let's face, who amongst us wouldn't have celebrated the way he did when they had that last minute winner, if it was any of us playing for Liverpool against the Mancs? I know I would.

Agree1 Disagree0

I missed the debate yesterday, but I might as well add my bit.

When GN first became a Sky pundit, I couldn't stand him. I used to turn the TV over straight after the match to avoid listening to him, but as time went on and I watched him a few times I quickly realised how good he is at reading the game. He knows what he's talking about and puts it across in a direct way, but that's what I like about him. JC looked a bit out of place at first but he also knows what he's talking about and for me they both do a good job.

Red Rum

Agree5 Disagree1

12 Dec 2014 08:32:39
Can I just put this out there;

I would rather win the Europa league than come 4th.

People don't remember your league positions. They remember the trophies you won. Plus it would qualify us for the CL anyway.

It'd give Rodgers a bit of credibility as well.

Believable17 Unbelievable2

12 Dec 2014 08:59:35
" Rather " is a wish or hope, reality is far from it Adam.
I don't see any chance us winning the EL. Simply because we wouldn't.

Agree11 Disagree1

I'd rather win the premier league

Agree6 Disagree0

Not saying I expect it mate, just that I want us to take the Europa league seriously.

Agree7 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 11:25:55
You have to keep clean sheets and score goals to win trophies r come in the top 4 so at this moment if Brendan delivered either it would be a major surprise to me a pleasant 1.

Agree2 Disagree1

I can see where you're coming from, but I would want the financial rewards for a higher finish.

However, bit of silverwear and champions league is a good shout, but I can't see it with Rodgers in charge.

Agree2 Disagree0

EMS u can forget about LFC winning any competition this year. There are probably around 10-12 teams in the Europa who would run circles around us, so there is no chance to win, not to mention our record in any European competition under Brendan is pretty horrible. Top4 finish and the Capital One Cup are our best bets for this season. Better to just forget about the rest and lower the expectations than be severely disappointed at the end of the season.

Agree4 Disagree0

Trophies are always a good thing for league position is a real barometer of quality - falling outside of the top 4 (which looks like a nigh on certainty) displays, in painful clarity, how much of a step back we have taken in such a short period of time. Now We are in the Europa League I want us to win it as its the only way I can see us qualifying for the CL next season. That is a sad indictment of where we currently sit as a club though.

Agree0 Disagree0

You win the Europa you don't need 4th as you qualify for the Champions League.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Dec 2014 08:03:59
Eds,

Do you think that if the keeper and centre back positions were resolved, ie. replaced as Mignolet and Lovren are simply way short of the standard required, we would get back to somewhere near the form we hit last season.
The team still has some really good players, and I for one would like to see a prolonged run in the team for both Coutinho and Lallana.
Yes we need Sturridge back, and in the summer we would probably need to spend big on another striker, as Sturridge won't score as many without Suarez alongside him, but if we could stretch the coffers and replace the two named above, we could have a decent cup run and push for a top five place, which we are way short of right now.
Your thoughts please.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - there is more to it. They need a style of play that fits the strengths of the players, which is not happening right now. If that was happening then we would be playing better anyway.}

Statistically, Sturridge actually scores more goal without Suarez in the side. Suarez had so many bans as well that it isn't exactly a small sample size. I can't remember who it was, but somebody actually proved it on here a while back. RDL or redohio I think.

Agree4 Disagree6

I think fans saying lovren is not up o standard etc, must remember this is a player who along with cahill and terry were the best centre backs in the league last season. He is being asked to split from his c, bk position to almost playing at l, bk and until lucas has come in with no cover in front of him! How do you think Terry, Kompany etc would cope playing in this system? I agree his form is not up to scratch, but he is a top player when played in correct system. Teams know how to play against BR teams time for him to try something new or I think his time will be up. unfortunately.

Agree1 Disagree0

EMS is right. Did the math a while back and Sturridge was on something like 1 every 107 minutes with no Suarez, 1 every 110 minutes with. Admittedly close, but it does show he's perfectly capable of scoring at a high rate without Suarez.

Agree5 Disagree0

11 Dec 2014 23:38:38
Let the kids play Europa league and time to focus on the PL.

Believable2 Unbelievable2

{Ed002's Note - Why do that - are Liverpool so much worse than every one else?}

12 Dec 2014 07:56:11
Considering the recent performances of our first team, it's hard to imagine that the kids will do worse

Agree5 Disagree0

The kids beat Basel 3-0 to progress out of their group.

Agree3 Disagree4

12 Dec 2014 09:04:03
The kids played with their kids Adam. Doesn't always mean every club has prosperous academies and youngsters.
Saints / Chelsea kids would beat our first teamers.

Agree0 Disagree0

I have no idea what you're talking about Harry.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why did people disagree with my first comment? That's a fact. They won 3-0 to progress from their group.

I can't even fathom why anybody would disagree with that. I guess some people on here just have a blatant agenda against me lol.

Agree6 Disagree2

 
Change Consent