24 Oct 2015 16:13:38
Some idiots on here at the minute, sell studge for someone less injury prone?
We already have benteke, firmino, origi and Sinclair, with Ings to come back. why add more to that?

1.) 24 Oct 2015
24 Oct 2015 16:28:22
I veritably wouldn't advocate selling our best player and replacing with with no one.

None of the strikers we have are in the same league as Sturridge.

2.) 24 Oct 2015
24 Oct 2015 16:57:13
If we sold him, we wouldn't need a replacement. I think we should keep him, he might get a bit more resilient, and when he is fit he's the best we have. What's the point of letting someone else have him even if he is rarely fit.

3.) 24 Oct 2015
24 Oct 2015 17:21:34
Yeah you don't sell a player of such quality regardless of his injury record.
Especially as we have plenty of cover.
Even of he's only fit 10-15 games a year he's still likely to score 10 goals.

4.) 24 Oct 2015
24 Oct 2015 17:27:07
Mikey1985 what are you talking about?

Are you telling me the forward line we have without Sturridge is good enough to win the league?

Benteke is very injury prone and will not score the goals that are required to win the league.

Firmino looks ok but is still completely unproven in the premier league.

Sinclair is a kid and completely unproven in the premier league.

Origi is a kid who looks ok in bursts but would not make it in any top six team right now.

Ings unfortunately is out for the remainder of the season which is a shame because he looked a real threat.

So yes I feel if we were to sell Sturridge we would need a replacement, further to that I feel we should sell him. Does that make me an idiot?

5.) 24 Oct 2015
24 Oct 2015 18:06:49
Yes it does con, for starters you can't read properly.

6.) 24 Oct 2015
24 Oct 2015 18:30:06
My reading is just fine mate.

I did ok getting the three degrees j have so I must be pretty reasonable at interpreting language.

You need to have a look at what your writing because you were implying that it would be crazy to replace Sturridge however in my opinion it would be crazy to not replace him.

7.) 24 Oct 2015
24 Oct 2015 18:50:37
I don't think there would be much point on holding onto a player for 10/15 games a season really. His wages would be massive for a part time footballer.

8.) 24 Oct 2015
24 Oct 2015 19:13:16
I'm implying don't sell him in the first place con.

9.) 24 Oct 2015
24 Oct 2015 22:00:36
Mikey, I agree but a time will come when that option won't be as far fetched as you think. Studge is of no use to us I he's injured the quarters of the season. That is a fact and if he can't justify his fitness or wages by not playing, he's of no use to us. And if he's of no use to us? Why is he still here? Football is a business and if a player can't stay healthy and produce, why should his club stick with him for ages without him justifying that faith? That is the reality that you cannot deny codified you do, you'll be disappointed when or if this scenario occurs.

10.) 25 Oct 2015
25 Oct 2015 08:20:09
We also still have Balotelli, he is only on loan!