09 Jul 2015 14:35:35
With only City seemingly interested in Sterling and a third bid looking elusive is it possible that Sterling will have to stay and will he be played if he does stay

{Ed002's Note - If the club cannot sell him then he stays. It really isn't rocket science.}

1.) 09 Jul 2015
09 Jul 2015 16:11:14
If Sterling stays and then moves on at the end of the contract- would Liverpool receive a fee decided by tribunal?

{Ed002's Note - They would be entitled to part payment.}

2.) 09 Jul 2015
09 Jul 2015 17:03:24
Should have taken the 40m and ran.

3.) 09 Jul 2015
09 Jul 2015 17:19:17
Which would be terrible business??

4.) 09 Jul 2015
09 Jul 2015 17:47:54
Would a tribunal fee be affected by these 40mil bids from city?

And the wage we payed him?

{Ed002's Note - No.}

5.) 09 Jul 2015
09 Jul 2015 19:21:00
Sterling ain't worth 50mil in other words twice the amount for Depay who is a much better player, not hating just being honest. The English media hypes up every young player to be more than what they are then they fade out as fast as they came about eg. Rodwell, Cleverly, Kyle Walker, Caulker tons of them. "All over hyped" and at the end of the day they end up being put under the spot light which makes their deficiencies pop up like zit. Should have taken the 40mil because in truth he ain't worth but 15mil - 20mil.

6.) 09 Jul 2015
09 Jul 2015 20:06:41
Have to agree with redohio on this one. I would have accepted the last bid from City and closed the book on the whole affair. Seemed a reasonable deal to me.

7.) 09 Jul 2015
09 Jul 2015 21:29:49
By the time qpr get there cut and Sterling gets his loyalty bonus etc we won't be left with much from any of it. Might as well put the pain in the arse in the reserves and run his contract down.

8.) 09 Jul 2015
09 Jul 2015 22:02:12
y2k3
tbh mate you're prob right though I kinda like the stance the club are taking - think City will bid again closer to the 50 mil and we'll accept ok - crazy money like but English players def go for a lot more than they are prob worth, think back to the like of 18mil for Bentley, the 35mil for Carroll etc etc

9.) 09 Jul 2015
09 Jul 2015 23:00:01
How is it, forever? Is he worth 50m? I wouldn't pay that for a kid still learning the game. Now we are stuck with this circus that would have been averted had we just taken the money and ended this farce so we can get on with the prep for the season. Obviously, some on here like our name being in the media for the dumbest reasons. Sometimes, you got to let stuff go instead clinging to a situation that would only make us look bad

10.) 10 Jul 2015
10 Jul 2015 02:07:16
He is not a kid