Liverpool Rumours Member Posts

 

SF_LFC's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing


No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




SF_LFC's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To SF_LFC's Posts

 

 

To SF_LFC's last 5 banter replies

 

SF_LFC has no Rumours Posts

 

 

SF_LFC has no Banter Posts

 

 

SF_LFC has no Rumour Replies

 

 

SF_LFC's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

27 Apr 2015 10:44:18
I agree that Rogers could and should say less but saying "Rogers spent similar. " is more than a little misleading.
Here are the facts:

ManUre's net spend in 2014 was £125.5 (£60.1M in 2013) whereas ours was £39M in 2014 (£23M in 2013). Same?

SF_LFC

{Ed002's Note - The difference is that they can afford it and are not breaching FFP - whereas Liverpool suffers complete financial mismanagement and has a manager who in both years pissed the money up the wall. This is again why we try and avoid discussing finances - most of you simply don't get it.}