Liverpool Banter Archive June 07 2015

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

07 Jun 2015 22:37:52
I don't understand why we don't just give Ward the chance to replace Jones on the bench. He's nearly 22 now, which is the same age Mignolet was on the bench for Sunderland, and he ended up displacing Gordon as first choice not long after. He was meant to be a good young prospect for us; do they not rate him anymore at all? What's the point letting our youth prospects stagnate for years? If we sign Bogdan, who I never really thought was any good at Bolton, then Ward will just end up going the same way as the likes of Gulacsi.

Believable22 Unbelievable1

08 Jun 2015 07:26:50
All the Gks in the u21 and youth teams at LFC will go the same way as their predecessors. The club's transfer policy is a mess because they think adding quantity signifies a successful transfer window and will actually appease fans. The very thought of signing Bogdan who is not even Bolton's first choice to challenge Migs makes me cringe. The idea should have been to sign someone like Cech, Trapp or even Patricio who are better than Migs and would take his spot in the first team. But it looks like the club will continue with its shambles of a transfer policy of blowing all the money on more midfielders and then penny pinching for the positions that actually need work.

Agree3 Disagree0

08 Jun 2015 08:21:39
Ward is already gone. LFC have chosen Vigouroux as the 3rd choice for the 1st team and first choice for the U21s.

Agree4 Disagree0

08 Jun 2015 08:24:48
Yeah Indian buzzer it really has been seen for the past 50 goalkeepers and 80 years right?
We bought 8 or so players last season and if anything purchased very few midfielders possibly lalanna and can would be the two.
it was one transfer window and this year so far we have the deal of the summer in Milner.
I am not going to say I know avid details about the coaching changes but from some people's words on here especially on paco it sounds like the club are trying to fix the problems.
and don't even mention the changes ed002 has been going on about behind the scenes.
So I'm not going to say we should all be ignorantly happy but seriously when there are clear and blatant changes are underway at the club after a bad season you at least have to wait for all the changes before claiming how crap everything is.

One final thing was everyone not saying that Rodgers could be a great coach if he had the right people around him less than two months ago? Now the club are actually doing this and I see a lot of the boo crowd have changed their arguments again!!

Agree3 Disagree3

08 Jun 2015 09:52:50
Shane, we bought markovic, lallana and can, that's just over a third of our signings last season. We already have allen, henderson, coutinho, lucas, sterling and now milner not to mention the players on loan and rossiter in the wings. Oh and that fella from inter were are reportedly after. I would say a top class striker is more of a priority along with getting shot of balo and fringe players we don't use.

Origi and Ings won't be of the required quality to challenge for top 4 but will be good players to come off the bench. As we already have origi i would argue that money earmarked for forward positions would be better spent on ONE quality striker and promote a youth player as 4th or 5th choice striker depending on how many leave.

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Jun 2015 10:26:49
We need to start playing midfielders in goals in the youth setup. We are not going to use the young keepers but it would give another midfielder an opportunity to clog up the squad with more midfielders!

Maybe we should look to play last man back in the u21s next season?

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 21:18:34
I know midfield isn't everyones first priority, as people want to see an attacker arrive. But it has got me thinking.

We have just brought in Milner and seems likely Kovacic will arrive from Inter. Both would be welcome additions in my opinion and I hope they both arrive.

I'm definitely expecting Lucas to leave this window along with Alberto. We've lost Gerrard as well. So I'm wondering with Kovacic arriving does this mean Allen may be allowed to leave?

If Kovacic does arrive that gives a midfield of Kovacic, Henderson, Milner, Coutinho, Lallana, Markovic, Ibe and possibly Sterling. If this is the case I can't see how Allen would even get a opportunity.

Believable8 Unbelievable4

07 Jun 2015 21:37:09
If kovacic does arrive then that leaves Allen as the weakest link.

Milner can play anywhere up top so if we where to sell sterling would it be out of the question for him to play down the side? Although to me it makes sense to go for konoplyenka.

What does bother me though is looking at keepers just to sit on the bench, bogdan is never going to challenge mignolet so it just seems like a wasted 20 grand a week or whatever he's on. I will take 1000 a week and save them some cash if that's all they want.

Just hope Ings and origi aren't the only strikers coming in, we're desperate for a top goalscorer so hopefully we don't just concentrate on the midfield again.

Agree6 Disagree2

07 Jun 2015 22:45:32
Would love it if Allen left, Welsh (cough) Xavi. He is up there with Sean Dundee and Salif Diao as possibly the worst player.

Agree12 Disagree15

07 Jun 2015 22:47:29
Kono ain't worth a hundred grand a week as the reports say and if that is what he wants then he can jug on so we giveOjo and Ibe more chances. As for Kovacic, not needed as well because we have options there already in the team and in the academy. We need a top striker and failure to get that in or try to get that done will be a major blow. Get the striker we need cost all this other stuff about more mids comin in is just a distraction, IMO.

Agree3 Disagree4

07 Jun 2015 22:56:19
best I heard on here I think? Welsh Jay Spearing

Agree9 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 22:59:39
Yeh but we all know that Allen will be first Name on the team sheet with Rodgers calling the shots

Agree7 Disagree1

08 Jun 2015 08:22:43
I am not so sure LFC will be going for Kovacic now that they got Milner.

Agree1 Disagree1

08 Jun 2015 08:57:43
Allen in the same bracket as Sean Dundee? Ridiculous comment, he's a decent player just not good enough for Liverpool and has in fact played many good games.

Agree4 Disagree0

08 Jun 2015 09:25:13
I think that's a bit harsh putting Allen in the same bracket as Salif Diao. He isn't Liverpool standard unfortunately but there have been games where he's bossed the midfield, they've just been few and far between.

Agree1 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 20:22:31
Is there any truth in Liverpool being 'favourites' to sign Ibrahimovic? Everything in my head tells me there is no chance of him joining us, but it's a little more exciting than Ings and Bogdan.

Believable2 Unbelievable8

{Ed002's Note - Sorry, I really don't know anything of it.}

07 Jun 2015 21:50:56
I do not think he would come to Liverpool and I doubt we would be interseted in a highly paid player of his age.

Agree6 Disagree2

07 Jun 2015 22:52:59
The issue is the head coach, not players.

Why cannot people get their head around this ?

Agree3 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 23:00:27
If Zlatan came I'd grow a pony tail and change my name to Ibra

Agree3 Disagree1

08 Jun 2015 05:27:23
well DBol ill start wearing a bra myself.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 19:20:26
Ibrahimovic. Zlatan. Probably Metro rubbish but nonetheless that made my day. Awesome.

The talisman we have been lacking.

Bring it on.

Believable2 Unbelievable24

07 Jun 2015 21:13:32
Official opening of Silly Season 2015!

Agree9 Disagree3

08 Jun 2015 08:33:08
Last season was silly season (Balotelli, This season is title season (Ibra).

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jun 2015 08:59:09
It's the head coach what? Why Zlatan won't come.
Yep that's the reason honest.

Agree1 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 18:30:44
Hi all I visit this site all the time great work I have sky sports app saying we won't tevez and also seen on net tht we after zlatan any truth in these rummors thanks

Believable3 Unbelievable18

07 Jun 2015 21:52:04
Both usual tabloid rubbish.Wn´t happen.

Agree3 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 17:40:50
Ed 001/002, Is there still interest in Luke Garbutt, or to your knowledge has it waned.
Thanks in advance for your reply
Ollivander

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I don't know of any interest from Liverpool.}

07 Jun 2015 17:22:46
Rumours of Carlos Tevez.

What do you reckon Eds? I know he's 31, but he is proven at the very highest level and has a similar tenacity and work ethic to Luis.

Would be interested to hear your opinion concerning his talent and feasibility.

liverpoolmanjack

Believable2 Unbelievable6

{Ed002's Note - See previous answers.}

07 Jun 2015 19:33:15
He left England because he hated England, all that hassle when he was here. People have such short memory's.

Agree7 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 16:57:00
People bagging Skrtel should go some perspective. Been player of the season twice, hardly injured and whilst has some faults, you can never fault his effort or commitment. Would not be against selling if right offer came in due to age, but the real problem is the others in defence, the terrible Dm (Lucas) and the coaching. Skrtel has been a quality purchase and has had a bigger impact than Agger.

Paying that amount for Lovern who is terrible is disgraceful. Should try and recoup half that now because he is only cost goals in the future. Nothing more than turnstile, no composure and turns like the titanic.

Believable4 Unbelievable40

07 Jun 2015 17:10:00
watch skrtel for one game closely and you will see the deficiences in his game. he should be the first centrehalf out of the door. then watch lucas closely for one game and you will see the work he does for the team.

Agree37 Disagree7

07 Jun 2015 17:40:50
Lucas was our best player this season behind Coutinho imo. Skrtel was our worst behind Balotelli. He is so difficult for defenders to work with and have you noticed that we never catch opponents offside because he sits so deep. Seems harsh on him but it's true

Agree7 Disagree5

07 Jun 2015 19:19:33
The defensive coaching has been poor, but even when Lucas has not played, Skrtel has looked bang average.

Agree9 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 19:29:42
Actually i dasagree with most about Skrtel. I understand Ed i think 01 saying he lacks a lot, especially in terms of communication and knowing who has what responsibility but i also think, in fact its undeniable - that he has saved us more times last season than IMO any other defender we had.
He has issued for sure and he is probably too stuck in ways to change them now but he will always put his body on the line and bag a few important goals along the way.
Also, stop slating Lovren. he is not terrible at all. Give the man some time.
Sakho gets a lot more praise and sometimes he has been solid, but i feel panic everytime he gets the ball as loast man and is under pressure. He fumbles quite a lot but seems to get a lot more praise?

Agree1 Disagree5

07 Jun 2015 19:32:56
Fa cup semi final. Cross field ball by villa over to their winger just inside our half out of no where skirts leaps to intercept. misses by a mile villa winger then takes control of the ball and runs at the heat of our defence which is left hole open as they say. Scores a few goals, would prefer if he stopped being at fault for most of our conceded ones.

Agree8 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 19:40:08
Craig, you have it backwards. It is Skrtel who cannot work with others within any system at all. I have watched Skrtel on many occasions closely and found that he is the worst of all our CB's because he is poor ability wise and makes others react to him when he goes missing on a wild goose chase due to his lack of communication skills. You cannot have a well drilled defence if one of the defenders is just free lancing and making it up as the game goes on. He is aweful and needs to go.

Agree9 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 21:49:58
gareth the reason Skrtel "saves" us so much is because he sits deeper than everyone else and ends up making a last ditch tackle that shouldn't need to make. I can't knock his bravery and he is good in a tackle but he plays on his own. He looks good on highlights but when you watch the full 90 it's a completely different story

Agree5 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 21:56:23
Defensive coaching and planning have been very poor. Skrtle has actually been our best defender this season but has , as said earlier , been exposed by a poor midfield. I cannot see this love in with Lucas who is so slow it is embarrasing.

Agree0 Disagree6

07 Jun 2015 22:06:10
Never mind what you think about Skrtel, any post that contains the words 'Lucas is a terrible DM' is either just trolling for aggro, or shows a complete lack of understanding of the game.
People talk about Gerrard being a great passer of the ball (which he was obviously), but just watch how quickly Lucas spots a player and finds a quick forward ball when there doesn't seem to be any options on.
If he had stayed injury free and started every game, I think we would have made top four last season.

Agree3 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 16:12:26
Hi Ed's,

Our season ended with henderson getting the captaincy role. Do you think he is the kind of leader we need or will there be a shift of captaincy possibly a player like Milner. or new signing may be. in the upcoming season.

Thanks.

Believable2 Unbelievable18

{Ed002's Note - I suspect it will be hard to take it away from JH, but if the club do, Milner and Lallana (if he is to be a regular) are the two obvious choices.}

07 Jun 2015 19:20:40
Sakho, or if he stays, Lucas, would be my choices.

Agree7 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 21:13:58
Sahko hardly speak English let alone shout orders on the pitch. Get real

Agree0 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 21:29:55
either milner or hendo.

Agree0 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 21:51:54
tbf Kman you don't need a huge range of language on the field. He captained PSG at 17 I think and also captained at youth level for France, my personal choice would be Hendo or Lucas but we could do a lot worse than Sakho

Agree4 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 21:59:27
It is ridiculous to say Hendersons captaincy had anything to do with our poor season and if Lucas is captain next season I will never watch another game. Hendo is not brilliant but is one of the few who will always give 100%. The only one suitable to hold the captaincy ahead of him is Milner.

Agree0 Disagree2

07 Jun 2015 22:51:43
He is also captain of Les Bleus so leadership is in his DNA so saying he doesn't shout orders or can't do that is severely wrong

Agree2 Disagree1

08 Jun 2015 10:04:36
Sakho speaks enough English to marshal a defense, and you must be watching the wrong team Kman, every time I have see Sakho play, he has been marshaling and shouting orders. Got watch a match.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 15:26:23
Apparently we sent scouts to watch Angelo Ogbonna last night according to ESPN, I find this hard to believe considering how many cb's we have on the books, any truth in this eds?

Believable0 Unbelievable12

{Ed002's Note - I have no idea where Liverpool scouts were last night, sorry.}

07 Jun 2015 16:02:25
Did he play? 7 scouts to watch a warm-up would give us a good idea of him!

Agree13 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 19:43:45
He's backup to Chiellini and Bonucci. If he didn't even get in ahead of Barzagli, the other backup then, no thank you. Besides, we don't need CBs.

Agree2 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 15:15:35
Ed001/2 can you see Liverpool signing a '1st team' striker or will we be pinning our hopes on Ings and Origi? Is Origi any good. Heard he was named in ligue 1s worst team of the season. Is this another Transfer policy masterclass?! Thanks eds

Believable0 Unbelievable12

{Ed002's Note - I have explained where there is interest and the club have certainly been looking at strikers.}

07 Jun 2015 16:07:33
Maybe wait for Origi to come and played a few games for us, before making up your own opinion on the player, as I think whoever did that bad (and wrong) article, it was just theirs at the end of the day!

Agree15 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 17:26:35
I think we may have bought a pup in Origi. But, to be fair to the lad, he was playing in a very poor Lille team and his head was probably at Anfield for most of the season. It's way too early to judge, especially on the back of a very poor and biased piece of journalism, so as always, as a fan, I will support him. But I fear, and I hate to say this, that he will not produce.

Agree4 Disagree2

08 Jun 2015 02:00:20
Origi's style is similar to Wilfried Zaha's at Palace.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 12:39:10
its been widely reported that there where 150,000 reasons why james milner opted for LFC,thats 7.8m a year,
utter madness if you ask me

Believable10 Unbelievable24

07 Jun 2015 13:07:58
He's worth £15m easily so we have got a steal of a transfer there if you ask me!

Agree18 Disagree2

{Ed002's Note - Plus:
(a) A very significant signing on fee to the player (possibly including non-reclaimable VAT if the player is VAT registered).
(b) Agent fees – this may be to one or more agents (as an example, Liverpool have spent well over £30M plus VAT on agent fees over the past three years leading to this window).
(c) Tax due on the agent fees – typically this is VAT at the local rate where the agent bills from – it is not reclaimable.
(d) Intermediary fees – this may be to one or more sponging leeches (what do you mean you have a super agent?) .
(e) Tax due on the Intermediary fees – typically this is VAT at the local rate where the Intermediary bills from – it is not reclaimable.
(f) Legal fees.
(g) VAT on legal fees which is reclaimable.
(h) Moving/relocation costs for the player.
(i) VAT on moving/relocation costs which is reclaimable.

07 Jun 2015 13:10:19
I would think that is distorted by the signing on fee being spread across his contract.

Besides, if you want top players you have to pay top wages. City offered him 165,000.

P.s. you spend way too long on our page trying to be funny. I've heard better banter from DaveyBlueBoy.

Agree23 Disagree10

07 Jun 2015 13:22:42
If he wasn't a free, it would have cost more to pay a transfer fee and his wages. Think we had a good deal. When we lose out on players because we won't pay the going rate the club gets slated on here, and when we pay the going rate, you still slate the club. Just can't win

Agree23 Disagree5

07 Jun 2015 13:23:35
With johnson,gerrard,jones leaving that's got to be nearly 300k in wages saved pw. 150k to milner 150k to ings bogdan and potentially clyne. So no loss there then. P.s ed2 please don't rip me a new hole on those figures haha.

Agree16 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 13:28:58
I'm excited by the signing. Perhaps we could justify the cost by looking at the reduced wage bill now Gerrard and Johnson have left. Plus, I'd much rather spend these wages on someone who a) has several years premier league experience and b) gives 100% in every match he plays. Too many players went missing in matches last year but I don't think Milner will.

Agree18 Disagree7

07 Jun 2015 14:08:35
"if you want a top player "

He's not a top player and never was

Agree18 Disagree19

07 Jun 2015 14:09:17
Yes but eds, we've still saved MILLIONS on a transfer fee. All those agencies that are due their fees would still have to be paid if we paid a transfer fee, that's what daredmen is on about, we've saved on a sizeable transfer fee.

Agree15 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - I understand perfectly the situation.}

07 Jun 2015 15:04:09
BY you giving the figures Ed02 are you more silently suggesting Milner is not worth it?? Just interested in your opinion

Agree1 Disagree14

{Ed002's Note - There are no secret messages.}

07 Jun 2015 15:07:38
Sorry Potato. Clearly you're better at judging players than Pellegrini, Wenger, Mancini, Capello etc.

Vincent Kompany called him an inspiration but what does he know? It's not like he's been his team mate for half a decade, his captain for almost as long or like he's current captain of one of the top international teams in world football.

City only offered him 165,000 for a laugh.

Agree20 Disagree9

07 Jun 2015 15:38:44
Thank you

Agree4 Disagree16

07 Jun 2015 19:33:18
so let me get this right,most of you are happy to pay 150k pw wages to a good bread and butter player,so what happens when some of lfc,s top players come knocking on the door asking the obvious quest "how da feck his he on that when you pay me this" also don't for get JM was at the lower end of the pay scale at CITY the top players are on at least double,i wonder if the likes of henderson is as happy with his new contract now?,does this mean stirling is more likely to leave? i wonder what coutinho,s agent is thinking? not forgeting martin skirtyl,in the words of Nigel pearson,are some of you must be ostriches

Agree2 Disagree4

07 Jun 2015 19:57:01
Don't really care what anyone says about a player. Use your own eyes and form an opinion. On that note, anyone who thinks Milner is a top player needs his eyes checked. He is not the player that will spark a team. He is not as skillful as Lallana or Can or Couts. Not a game changer like Couts and just as hardworking and high energy as Hendo, Lallana and Can. Hence, how is he a top player?

Agree3 Disagree5

07 Jun 2015 23:38:05
sorry ems, have to disagree with you here. if milner is the definition of top player than we might aswell give up.

Agree2 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 11:59:34
With all the new midfielders we already have and are getting in - Milner and supposedly Kovacic - does this signal that Rodgers sees Can as a permanent right sided defender whether as right back or part of a back three? I know he has largely performed well there but his preferred and best position is in the middle. I'd love to see him in an attacking midfield role. Anyone else think he's not being played to his strengths at the back?

Believable4 Unbelievable22

07 Jun 2015 12:09:31
Or rotate him and lucas as the dm in a diamond for e.g with hendo/milner/allen/kovacic(if we get him) on either side. Coutinho/lallana at the tip behind studge/origi/ings and who else new

Agree16 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 12:09:38
Can doesn't pass the ball quickly enough to play in midfield.

Agree7 Disagree28

07 Jun 2015 12:37:23
i don't think we'll get kovacic, we need to double our offer as ed002 says. which we rarely do. bt then again its a player we don't need, so we might. *sighs*

Agree4 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Liverpool can get the player if the offer the asking price.}

07 Jun 2015 12:47:21
I'm surprised certain clubs bother dealing with us after offering stupidly low prices for players - it's plain disrespectful.

Agree5 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 12:49:41
Kovacic will be very good in the future if coached well, but sometimes I wonder why we keep buying midfelders. A DM was only needed in that area of that pitch.

Agree10 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 13:24:55
Ed i know you don't like it but is the fee the reported €25m

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - That is the asking price.}

07 Jun 2015 13:28:24
Amit. No more disrespectful than Man City offering £25 mill for sterling. It's called bargaining and if both parties want the deal to go through they compromise on the price

Agree12 Disagree2

07 Jun 2015 13:54:36
Kovaicic does hold potential, he'd be our best midfield prospect by a country mile. The fact we have mediocracy coursing through the team, it's unlikely we'll get him. Can won't cut it in the midfield, he has no peripheral vision and loses possession to often when he receives the ball from defence. To me he's like a boxer with great technique but has a glass jaw. Kovaicic on the other hand seems to hold tremendous ability to break with the ball at pace, he can turn well in either direction. We don't get players like Kovaicic, Vietta, Lacazzetta etc. We have to put up with Mr Harley Davidson and his budget brief being laughed out of town with derisory offers. We'll end up with another summer of third shelf transfers with flaws in their game as usual.

Agree4 Disagree15

07 Jun 2015 13:58:05
But qwhy offer €22m and not just the asking price if it is indeed €25m.

Agree2 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 14:19:37
£18m isn't exactly expensive is it. that's less than henderson. Why offer £9m, no wonder they thought it was a joke. Surely if you enquired and Inter said 18m you say 15m, so at least they know your serious and not taking the mick.

Agree4 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 14:57:26
Ed, I can't see us stumping up that asking price, can you? Having said that if we've known the asking price all along why are we wasting our time. Besides I'm not sure he is what we need. He is another attacking midfielder ain't he?

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 15:06:34
I agree we will need to pay near asking price perhaps but like others i am scratching my head wondering why on earth we need another midfielder??!!
If we were to sell 1 or 2 attacking midfielders i could understand but just seems crazy

Agree1 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 15:46:31
Aren't Inter struggling financially as they were when we got The Magician for comparative peanuts? Maybe that's why we didn't immediately bid the 'asking price'?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - The bid was ignominious and simply added some Spanish journalists to the stockpile who think the club has become an embarrassment within the European game.}

07 Jun 2015 19:50:57
coutinho was not a first teamer when we bought him. which is why he was cheap.

Agree1 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 20:05:07
Those who have learnt nothing from history are doomed to repeat it. We have mids coming out of our ears and noses in the first team and the academy YET we are adding more like coin collector collects coins. Soon we will be playing all mids in our first eleven because BR is obsessed with his possession rubbish. What will happen to our academy mids as well as Can, who is potentially better than him but is never played there? No one is addressing that and everyone is hailing Kovacic coming in potentially to play where we are already over served in. Lord help this club.

Agree1 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 23:12:27
Ozone,a bit harsh on Can when you judge him as a mid who actually never plays there. How do we know he won't cut it when BR always plays him where he will struggle hence destroying his confidence? We paid 10m for him and barely ever played him in a position to get the best out of him and suddenly we have written him off whereas bris the reason he looks bad. What if Kovacic arrives and our boy messes him up like he did Can and looks bad, you want him gone as well? Listen, Bayern don't put a buy back clause in your contract if they think you suck when they sell you as they did with Kroos, Lahm, Alaba, an d Hummels (who refused to go back). He's 20 and still learning and he is a super talent technically and physically. We need to help him to fulfill that talent instead of jettisoning him for being mismanaged by The Nose

Agree1 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 11:06:12
Hi eds,
Rumours from metro are saying FSG have cleared the way for Tevez to sign, would be
A quality signing considering his record in
The premier league, also metro are saying we are offering a contract for cassikas i know these are only rumours but 2 quality captures they would be!!

Believable2 Unbelievable24

07 Jun 2015 11:31:48
I mentioned this and got slated.

Tevez would be an ideal signing but I'm not sure he would come.

Agree6 Disagree12

07 Jun 2015 11:34:03
The metro is is the worst rag out there

Agree16 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 11:37:40
I would avoid any transfer rumours in the metro tbh.

Agree10 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 11:51:43
As soon as I see 'metro' on a football rumour I immediately believe the opposite.

Agree11 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 12:16:09
The metro were also reporting this morning "Liverpool remain favourites for Swedish megastar Zlatan Ibrahimovic". wouldn't believe a thing they say tbh

Agree11 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 16:16:42
According to a Metro, we should sign half of Europe.

Agree2 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 10:31:49
Any interest in Hernandez? I think he would suit our style better than Benteke and is proven in the PL.
We haven't had a penalty box poacher like him since Owen and he would certainly lighten the load off Sturridge(when fit), or would this old " we don't sell to the enemy" nonesense prevent a deal?

Believable3 Unbelievable3

{Ed002's Note - A lot and there are things happening, but nothing to do with Liverpool.}

07 Jun 2015 11:27:06
We don't do business with the Red side of Manchester!!

Agree9 Disagree2

07 Jun 2015 08:49:46
I don't get it! There are people praising former players who desperately wanted to leave us and bashing players who are going to join us! So let's continue congratulating and supporting Suarez who was trying to leave us for 2 years, ruined our reputation and has absolutely no interest in coming back to us and keep claiming Milner, the ultimate professional, is not good enough to play for us. S--t is getting worse and worse!

Believable34 Unbelievable6

07 Jun 2015 09:03:11
I don't think anyone is being overly critical of Milner's capabilities, it's more whether he's really needed.

Agree18 Disagree12

07 Jun 2015 09:30:11
To be fair we do very well at ruining our own reputation, we can't handle anything the way it should be.

Agree26 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 09:33:56
He's a top four player. We need as many of those that we can get!

Agree25 Disagree6

07 Jun 2015 11:09:12
Regardless of Suarez's personal aspirations, he always gave 100%. Do you blame Suarez for wanting to leave? I don't, we will be around fifth or Sixth for a long time now.
No one is bashing Milners professionalism either, he just isn't the brilliant footballer we desperately need.

Agree5 Disagree23

07 Jun 2015 11:11:53
I don't think Milner is a top four player. If he was he would of had a regular place at City. Not only that, every England manager has only deemed him worthy of a bit part, always a substitute. Henderson is normally picked ahead of him at international level and don't see why it is not going to be the case at LFC. He's a grafter, will always give 100% but in terms of true quality he is 90% graft 10% craft.

Agree4 Disagree29

07 Jun 2015 11:38:57
Suarez was a great player when he played but he was a complete moron and embarrassed/ insulted the club with his actions on and off the pitch.
I don't care what he does with the rest of his career.

Milner is a great signing. Those comparing him to Gary Mac are spot on in my opinion.

Agree24 Disagree7

07 Jun 2015 15:58:12
Like all south americans his ultimate goal would be to move to madrid or barca. Just because his ambitions didn't fall in line with ours doesn't mean i am happy that he has achieved exactly what he wanted in the best way possible. I wouldn't expect him to join us and suddenly change his mind about what his lifelong goal was and stay at liverpool, that's just selfish thinking imo.

Agree10 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 16:03:09
Natural poolie,

How well have England done that you are using them as an example. Wow hodgson didn't pick him, must be a bit part player. You must be truly desperate for something to complain about.

Agree13 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 20:10:22
Natural poolie is right. Milner is not a game changer like Couts, not as skillful as Lallana and Can and just as hardworking and high energy as Hendo, Can and Lallana. Result? He is not better than what we already have so he is NOT a top player. He was a utility backup at City and will not spark our team the way many are making him out to be which in some quarters, smacks of desperation.

Agree0 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 08:45:14
Why are we trying to sign another centre half Ogbonno because Skrtle is leaving?

Even if Skrtle leaves we have Lovren, Sahko, Toure and Ilori which is enough. We also hav Wisdom if needed.

Money that certainly spent in other areas.

Believable10 Unbelievable2

07 Jun 2015 09:32:58
Hes also a left footed lcb so pointless story really.

Agree7 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 08:00:47
Just wondering if this axe wielding is a ploy to get Rodgers to quit? Is there a surprise still to come?

Believable3 Unbelievable1

07 Jun 2015 08:39:08
How many more people are going to come on here posting the same thing.Lets just wait and see what happens

Agree18 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 10:13:59
You have to think that if they wanted him gone they'd just sack him, surely?
Having said that, what is the reasoning behind sacking two right hand men, but not the senior man who chose them and managed them?
Is this a sign that they think rodgers has shown enough potential that it is worth persisting with him, but they think the remedy to the problems he creates is to take away the yes men he prefers around him, and install new coaches who will challenge him and develop him more?
I'm struggling to see how pascoe can be at fault enough to warrant dismissal, but not the mentor figure, ie rogders himself?
Either way, he is clearly on very thin ice.
You have to think that a poor start to next season will see him gone. It would be interesting to know how the owners will define a poor start, in terms of points won?

Agree7 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 12:41:04
Coaching the team in terms of fitness and defending has been major deficiency in the past 3 seasons. It makes sense to change this along with the other changes we probably haven't heard much about - scouting, recruitment etc.
Dealing with these issues also leaves Rodgers with no excuses. If the team fails to improve, he will be next to be moved on. It's sink or swim time for Rodgers next season.

Agree1 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 12:49:07
I see it more likely that the owners, for reasons best known to themselves, want to give Rodgers a second chance. They aren't going to accept nothing changing however, there certainly does seem to be an issue with the coaching. Rodgers is a good coach, and can improve players as well as most, however he is hopeless with the media and a simply awful man manager.

Agree1 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 13:06:22
Sink or swim time for Rodgers?

He was competing with submarines last season.

Let Pako take over, if we cannot get Emery.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 13:40:39
I hope I am wrong but I get the impression that quite a few on here want us to have a terrible start to the season,just so Rogers gets the sack. I want us to have a brilliant start and a terrific season,but sadly I don't get that from the posts of some on here

Agree2 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 20:15:33
Red, I'm not. I have been consistent in saying he should go and even if we had a bad start, it wouldn't be his fault. It would be the owners fault for not making the not so hard choice of sacking him. Instead, they plunked out and are now doing the dumbest thing by firing everyone else but him for reasons only they can say and which to me, will blow up in everyone's faces. Happy Times, eh?

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2015 01:07:05
Eds - do you know if Paco Ayestaran will be coming back to Anfield?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - RTP.}

07 Jun 2015 07:43:08
I hope these rumors about Pako coming back are true. If and when Brendan gets the boot, the club will have a ready made replacement to turn to instead of throwing money at an outsider. Also won the treble in Israel inspite of being relatively new to the role of manager and the players will know how important he was to the club win the Rafa years so hopefully he comes in.

Agree5 Disagree2

07 Jun 2015 09:46:27
The man is overqualified for the position (asst manager), and it would be a step backwards in his career.

Agree7 Disagree7

07 Jun 2015 09:50:10
I can't see wanting a job as a no2 now that he has had the taste of being the boss. I can see him possibly looking for a coaching job in Europe if anything.

Agree9 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 11:34:43
This could be a Houllier/Evans situation.

Agree1 Disagree1

07 Jun 2015 12:44:20
Agree with Davey, Pako could go to a less high profile job in Europe as a manager, but this would be a chance to audition for the LFC top job.

Agree2 Disagree1

 
Change Consent