Liverpool Banter Archive April 01 2015

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

01 Apr 2015 23:19:41
I've read the interview with Sterling; here are my thoughts. (if you care to read).

He would have signed if he was offered a new contract last year if offered a deal - he didn't get into the team until December if I remember correctly - so approximately 4 months into his second season.

He wants to win trophies - fair enough put a clause in contract offered stating you can leave for 50 million if Champs league or no trophies (or specify which trophies need to be won) in contract.

IMO regardless of his talent and his potential; 100k per week for approximately 100 senior games is an amazing offer. I have no hate towards him; then again to say you focused and Arsenal interest is flattering tells the story really.

I'm sure he will go on / continue to be a marvelous player but I'd rather have Ibe; that being said - I hope the club ensure they reward players rather than thinking they have 4 years left on their contract so don't bother - all very corporate to me!

Believable11 Unbelievable0

02 Apr 2015 16:40:41
We would be rewarding failure at that point if we gave him a new contract last December because he had and has still NOT achieved anything YET. Also, he has allowed his advisors to lead him on like this dreadful interview which achieved NOTHING but fan the flames even more. There is enuff blame to go around for this fiasco BUT BR and SG started this circus by airing their worthless opinions on an issue that should never have come out in the media to begin with. If the Arse want him, they should remember to add an extra pound to the amount they offer, tho.

Agree1 Disagree1

01 Apr 2015 22:37:48
Once you've planted the seed, you can never go back.

We've put up with it on far too many occasions now Liverpool fans.

If he signs, he'll moan again in two years.

Don't hold us to ransom as we're sick of it.

Get rid.

Believable30 Unbelievable3

01 Apr 2015 23:35:14
I am with you on that. So very dissapointing. You would expect someone so young that has a lot of potential but also so much to work on, to focus on a. how he can improve and b. how he can try and help this squad which everyone can see has great potential, to win trophies - a bit of challange at least in the next 3-4 years.

If he would have done that, score 15 goals and give 10 assists for 4 or 5 seasons and still no major trophies and no attempt to do something about it by the club, if then he says I want to try my luck elsewhere, well fair enough. maybe just.

But he basically says that he couldn't be bothered to make the effort to try to make a change in a team like Liverpool (who played this year in the CL and is three wins away from winning the FA cup). He prefers to move to one of the teams that have so much money they can buy every available (or non available) player on the planet, including from the main rivals and this way buy themselves trophies. He will probably play there considerable less but at least he can put a lot of trophies in his cupboard straight from his 21st birthday.

I find it quite sad really. I know you can say the same about the Southampton players that came to us but first of all they were older and second they could at least argue that if they don't move now to a big team they will never get another offer.

I don;t mind him leaving if we get decent amount for him but am worried about the knock on effect in term of big names refusing to come. Suarez going last season ruined our season and Sterling going next summer after it will obvioulsy be dragged for months, will not help us starting the next year. And him joining a rival PL team will not help.

Agree2 Disagree2

02 Apr 2015 16:48:04
I can`t see him being a certain starter in the City`s and Chelsea`s of today. At the Arse, maybe 100k is not enuff then he would have made his bedd and it will be time to lie in it. His advisors have led him down this path and maybe, the damage is done. HOWEVER, I disagree that his departure if there is one, will hinder us cis to me, we will have Ibe, Marko, Tex and maybe Depay or a better option to fill his spot so IMO, we will be more than fine and he will DEFO not be missed.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Apr 2015 01:56:07
Probably the first time I've agreed with you Davey!

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 21:08:59
Get de boer in.
Buy a decent right back.
Buy a decent striker.
Keep Lucas.
Revert to a more suitable formation (442, diamond or similar)
Demand the team play a high tempo, high pressing, attacking style of play.
Ensure no players are played out of position.
Sell all the players that are surplus.
No more "squad players" replace them with academy players.
Find suitable loans for youngsters deemed too good for the academy and not ready for the first team.
This is what I'm going to do in my first summer as liverpools new DOF (and saviour)

Believable11 Unbelievable18

01 Apr 2015 23:01:33
So the DOF now tell the manager what formation to play and which position players should play in? Will you let De Boer decides the starting 11 or you will send it to him by fax two hours before the match?

And will you bring the money from home to buy a decent right back and a decent striker? or you hope to get the 50-60M required for a decent attacker and a decent right back from selling Glen Johnson and Borini?

And of all the positions rightback is what you would buy? We have Ibe, we should have Flanno next year, Markovich can play there as well as Can.

I cannot hear anymore this term 'out of position' for players who are 20 years old. Players should play where they contribute most for the team. And if this is in a different place than where they played in their previous team who cares? Our defence is doing fantastically well in recent months partly because Can is in the back and Moreno is not. What is the problem with that?

Agree3 Disagree6

02 Apr 2015 00:20:05
If we where to go back to a back 4 (I would)
Then a right back would be a priority as all the players you mentioned are not suitable right backs (apart from flanno who has been injured a whole year)
I'm sure you could pick up a decent striker and right back for a lot less than 50-60m maybe 25m could buy them both and a lot of that would be funded by selling a lot of the fringe players and the freeing up of wages, most notably Gerrard and Johnson.
As a DOF I would be dictating the style of play and allowing de boer to impliment it and pick the players accordingly.
I completely agree players should be played where they contribute most to the team, unfortunately that's not the case currently and you even suggest playing more out of position in Can, Markovic, and Ibe.
I'm going to send my CV to Henry and see what happens lol

Agree3 Disagree0

02 Apr 2015 16:54:02
Which is why BR`s system although productive in the short term, is not the long term solution due to square pegs being in round holes. We need a RB, a CM a DM if lucas leaves to help Can when he moves in there and a very good striker (which will be hard to find with no CL potentially)to go into the first team and like Mikey says, play players where they are most effective.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 20:01:29
Why all this hate towards Sterling.

The boy is one of the top talents in Europe and has played several positions this year without complaining, often in positions and formations which do not suit him.

I like the fact he is ambitious and if the club can't match that ambition, sell him and buy better than we did with the Suarez money.

I would rather have players at my club who want to reach the top than hangers on stealing a living that are not worthy of wearing the Liver bird on their chest.

If the club qualified for CL this season as they should have with the money spent Sterling's contract would have been signed months ago.

Blame Rogers and the committee if he leaves not the kid, who will have his pick of clubs if he does move on.

Believable4 Unbelievable22

01 Apr 2015 20:41:29
Are there any posts on here not about sterling?
It's getting a bit tedious now.

Agree21 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 20:44:36
I'd rather have a player at the club who wants to be there, He clearly doesn't. Since his contract negotiations stalled and hit the headlines, he has been consistently poor in a red shirt.
But people won't acknowledge this for some reason? his head is already away and has been the last couple of months.
He wants to win trophies. fair enough can't see him doing too much of that at Arsenal, but he is flattered by their interest and he is a London but don't forget.
If he thinks he's talented enough to play his favourite position for the likes of Real Madrid,Bayern Munich, Man city he's deluded.
Ibe for me is showing more maturity as a footballer than sterling ever has,
LFC need to make sure they sell while his stock is still high,
He doesn't want to be here we need to let it him go.

Agree15 Disagree1

01 Apr 2015 20:50:08
Yes MIKEY1985 , we are signing Barry Chuckle , Steven Hawking & a traffic cone in the summer to replace him ha ha

Agree3 Disagree10

01 Apr 2015 22:10:02
Elderslie, business as usual then

Agree5 Disagree4

01 Apr 2015 22:23:52
Elderslie in your post it says blame Rodgers. I have never seen those two words on these pages before. It gets to predictable. So is Sterling development not down to Rodgers?

Agree9 Disagree1

01 Apr 2015 23:09:19
Get real. Sterling don't deserve money he's demanding.
Score 20 goals a season pal, consistently and then ask for big money.
James Rodriguez, Paul Pogba, Marcos Reus, Mario Gotze have produced/ done better and not even on half money Sterling demanding
I'd let him rot in reserves. See who willing to pay £100k per week after that!!

Agree8 Disagree2

01 Apr 2015 23:12:49
His agents brainwashing him. Trying to manufacture massive pay deal, like SUAREZ agents done, at least SUAREZ produced game in, game out.
Sterling only done interview because agents think they can pressure LFC . If he genuinely has other Clubs willing to pay what he wants . Then why haven't they declared their interest?
My Club will be around long after him, I'd get rid,

Agree2 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 23:33:39
The player and the manager should get the credit but IMO, most should go to the player and Sterling should get the credit for striving to get better. IMO, fans have fallen for the media circus around Sterling and have turned against him instead of letting the process play out and debate the issues thereafter. I feel for the boy.

Agree2 Disagree2

02 Apr 2015 00:19:38
Sterling would walk into city's team. he's better than navas and nasri and milner outwide

Agree0 Disagree4

02 Apr 2015 13:25:49
Mighty Reds ,

The development of Sterling is mainly down to the boy himself in the same way that the lazy performances of Balotelli over the last few years are also his responsibility.

When I say blame Rogers and the committee I mean for the inept way Suarez was replaced, having had a year's notice he would be leaving.

If this was dealt with better and the team performed as they should I've no doubt Raheem would feel he can win trophies and play regular CL football at Liverpool, as it stands currently that's not guaranteed.

Hopefully the club can convince him better players are coming and he stays as he is going to be a star in future years.

Agree0 Disagree1

02 Apr 2015 17:11:06
Good shout there, derby.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 19:51:22
If sterling wants to go so be it and good luck
Get the most we can get for him and buy two top players with the money.
We need 3 top players this summer to go into the first 11 not a miller or Walcot.
A GK, midfielder and strikera

Believable14 Unbelievable1

01 Apr 2015 21:23:52
Yeah but we won't though will we. Who we going to bring in better? Look at what we did with 70 million. We'd Probably end up getting Milner, Delph and Ings

Agree6 Disagree5

01 Apr 2015 22:11:43
BR said quality not quantity before last summer and look what happened - poor selection of players not needed for positions already with plenty of cover

Agree2 Disagree7

01 Apr 2015 23:33:32
He clearly doesn't want to be at liverpool. A bit of loyalty would be nice as the club appears to have done a good job in helping him develop as a player. i'm doubtful that his main reason for wanting to leave at this stage is to win trophies. If I'm wrong then good luck to him. Surely if his aim is to win trophies then he would be better to stay and develop at Liverpool for another 3 or 4 years. Being garaunteed first team football in a team that are striving to become a permanent top 4 fixture would aid his development more than uprooting and having to reestablish himself somewhere else? if after 3 years Liverpool were where we all want them to be and had won the premier league and were once again a force in Europe then Raheem would have his wish. If not he would of become a better player with greater maturity to help him settle and likely have his pick of top clubs. If he's truly all about his career and trophies then he needs to have a big think about his next move. A move to the likes of Madrid or Chelsea right now could ruin a potentially very good player.

Agree1 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 23:35:12
Which is why he will be facing the music w/ the owners this summer.

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Apr 2015 06:38:22
We went for Sanchez, falcao(look how that worked out), ye are so great at saying we should be buying this guy or that guy, well short of kidnapping them what should we do, we can't pay the stupid wages due to ffp as Ed002 pointed out, so who do we bring in?

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 19:40:44
I doubt sterling has enough desire to stay with liverpool and feel sure if serious top team who are capable of winning major trophies come in for him he will be gone .this is football now and we still have some way to go to compete with the moneybags

Believable4 Unbelievable0

01 Apr 2015 19:28:49
I've always posted in favour of Rodgers. The reason for this is that under his tenure I've actually enjoyed watching a lot of the football that our team has played. This wasn't the case under any other manager since Roy Evans. Right now I'm unsure as to what I think the right course of action would be in the summer regarding keeping or replacing our manager. Whilst I generally enjoy watching the team under Rodgers, I rarely remember watching our team so unmotivated when playing United at Anfield. and there was so much riding on that game. After finishing 2nd last season then nothing other than comfortable top 4 this season would seem and acceptable result. Yes we lost suarez and losing Sturridge was unlucky but the club knew suarez was going to leave and Sturridge injury record was poor. I like some of the summer recruits and see lots of potential for most of them. The exceptions being lambert, balotelli and Lovren (although I must admit to thinking that Lovren was the answer to our defensive problems when we signed him). My issue with the summer signings was that we had to try and replace suarez. I know we couldn't do that with one player but we did need to sign one quality striker. I have no inside knowledge however and didn't realise that rodgers had said no to lacazette and bony until I read it a couple of weeks ago. think I searched here and ED001 said that rodgers rejected them along with Remy? If that is the case then Rodgers is ultimately responsible. Not having a top notch frontman is undoubtedly what has cost us this season and if that is down to Rodgers, then he has to take the fall. 2nd to what won't be top 4 I'm sure won't be tolerated by the owners. If Rodgers is culpable for the decisions then it's only right that decisions taken to improve the clubs position next year will involve his position. Should this be that he has to work under a DOF or just removed as manager. I don't know. I think that I agree with ED001. a DOF should be found first and allowed to decide wether he wants to work with Rodgers or choose his own man. However this only works if we can find a top DOF. I'm not knowledgeable enough to suggest a top DOF but I think that the best option would be a good one who could work with Rodgers. He is obviously a good coach because there has undoubtedly been a lot of improvement in the technical ability of many of our players under his reign. Also many of the current players are Rodgers choice and history suggests that stability within a club tends to breed success. Thoughts please

Believable8 Unbelievable2

01 Apr 2015 19:43:23
Very well worded an accurate post, and I agee.

Agree1 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 19:51:26
It's waste a time saying anything good about Rodgers on here, because he gets blamed for everything. People are not even willing to see how this season finishes, then judge him. Some of the football as been the best under Rodgers for along time but I feel guilty for giving him any credit at all on these pages.

Agree6 Disagree4

01 Apr 2015 20:50:19
I largely agree with your post.
I have been critical of Rodgers this season. But I do agree that under a DOF a few of his major flaws will disappear (transfer policy etc).
I have a feeling the owners won't sack Brendan this summer as such but try and impose a DOF and/or a defensive coach on him. The owners must be aware that Brendan will benefit from this or he will let his pride take over and walk.
Either way is a win/win.
I can see the whole situation getting a bit messy this summer.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 22:38:25
We have 1 problem at our club. Bringing in terrible players.
Suarez needed to be replaced with a goals scorer, you can't take 30 goals out of your team and better/equal the previous season. We cocked this season up before a ball was barely kicked

Agree2 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 23:42:42
Agree with all you posted. A lot has to change ome this smmer and that starts w/ BR and his useless stubborness and antics. A DOF IMO, do not really work with a coach already in place because they want to have some type of control which is why they often bring in their own coach at least most of the time. BR messed up big time and if top 4 doesn`t happen, I doubt he will keep his job.

Agree0 Disagree1

01 Apr 2015 23:57:17
Thank you Benny baller

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Apr 2015 09:20:34
I agree with pretty much everything you said in your post, and you worded it much better than I could have as well. Particularly the part about Suarez not being effectively replaced. When he left I felt positive about it, with his disciplinary record I felt it was time for him to move on, and was excited about the combination of players we'd replace him with. Unfortunately it seems that it was used to boost the squad rather than improve the starting 11. I feel like last summer window was absolutely crucial to being able to maintain top 4 and challenge for the title consistently, our first big chance in years, so finishing outside the top 4 is taking us back to where we were pre-rodgers, and getting in a new manager will, again, mean needing time to adapt. So frustrating.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 18:42:45
Sell sterling if he wants to go and buy Depay, also we badly need a new forward as Sturridge is too often injured.

Believable4 Unbelievable0

01 Apr 2015 20:27:33
Depay is class

Agree2 Disagree1

01 Apr 2015 22:46:22
Yeah because he's going to choose Liverpool when we're selling players like Sterling? We should be selling Balotelli, Lambert, Johnson, Borini.
They Seriously need a rethink our owners because these transfers are just useless from this committee

Agree3 Disagree2

01 Apr 2015 23:43:23
Seen Depay last couple of games and he is a beast of a player.

Agree1 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 18:23:28
Hi Eds

Noy sure if i hit the send button earlier not. I was asking your thoughts please on Sterlings interview. Quite a lot said and nothing that i can see that sais he will hopefully sign a contract. Very disheartend when i read it tbh mate. Thought?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - I haven't read it yet to be honest, sorry.}

01 Apr 2015 21:01:38
Be interested to no your thoughts mate once you read please. I doubt he will stay after what's been said tbh, be interested to no if you change your mind on him signing mate.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I will search it out first thing tomorrow.}

02 Apr 2015 06:48:47
Good morning Ed

Are you on it mate yet? I no ots early but what's your take.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I am literally listening to it now. I find it extremely disappointing that he has done this, but Rodgers should have kept his mouth shut and not put him in a difficult situation. Now he has become a target of abuse and so he feels he has little choice. This was a similar issue to that which surrounded the club during Rafa's time, all the dirty washing being aired in public and it is not the way the club does things.}

02 Apr 2015 09:19:19
I agree mate. And its now what every footy fan is talking about and reading about. Its embarrising its come to this tbh. Think if we don't get top 4 then he will be gone? Or is there more to it than that.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - there is more to it, but that is a factor.}

01 Apr 2015 18:56:20
Arsenal fan here.
The sterling situation is an interesting one just wondering if you think he will go. Or what wage he would stay for.

I'm told Sturridge is on 150k you should be offering him the same I believe. Champs league. More money and a return to London could be to hard to resist. Not saying hel join us big ask that

Believable2 Unbelievable2

01 Apr 2015 19:24:03
I think he will go bud, his head has been swayed by agents and the whole money world of football. He said he's not greedy but he has turned down 100k a week at 20yo ?? He is decent but he ain't bigger than the club, I think he will go abroad or maybe to City, no disrespect to you as it does look like you will finish in that much loved top 4 again. We will see suppose. I will be gutted if he leaves and its a massive loss. Others will make light of it and Rosie it up but not me. Gutted.

Agree3 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 19:54:17
Scous . I'm a massive Jordan ibe fan too I do believe he will be a top player of can stay injury free. Bit like gnabry for us. Both insane talents.

On sterling I feel him being on 35k a week now and you should of gone in bog last year and got it sorted. Time will tell mate and good luck for end of season. Just not the weekends game :)

Agree0 Disagree1

01 Apr 2015 22:05:18
If he goes I hope we get as much money as possible this time and sell him to a foreign club not a direct opponent.

Agree1 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 18:29:08
Id just like to offer up my opinion of this Sterling business,
I understand he wants to deal with it at the end of the season and I know he's stated he wants to win things, but what has he achieved so far to warrant such spectacular wages?
He never knows whether to go round a man or stop with the ball, his finishing is far far from the finished article, his final ball is woeful at times, his main asset is his pace but Wright-Phillips, Walcott, Lennon, Townsend, Redmond anyone?
I know he has potential but the lads 20 and if i'm honest I think Ibe is a far bigger prospect given the chance to play where he should be playing, NOT wingback by the way,
I DO like Sterling but all this does make me wonder what might be happening behind the scenes with regards to BR, future plans for players, guarantees given to the lad by the powers that be etc etc
Is he someone we can cash in on if the deal falls through? would we take 40 million plus for him?
Me personally I would but only if someone else is buying the players off the back of funds being made available! Sorry BR but i'm not convinced youll be staying beyond this season!

Believable0 Unbelievable1

01 Apr 2015 18:52:24
He will be gone mate in the summer, can't rosie it up in anyway what so ever. Massive loss.

Agree3 Disagree1

01 Apr 2015 22:02:53
Ibe will be bigger and better

Agree3 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 23:48:22
Or maybe we can all stop with the suppositions and let the negotiations run its course

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 18:13:26
Banter please saw this aprils fools gag on facebook and thought i would share it .



Steven Gerrard could have played his last game for Liverpool following a spectacular bust-up with manager Brendan Rodgers.


The Reds captain, who is currently serving a three-match suspension, has already agreed to join Los Angeles Galaxy at the end of the campaign.


But the chances of Gerrard returning to action before then have grown increasingly unlikely after the 34-year-old stumbled across a scrap of paper with his name on, tucked inside an envelope in Rodgers' office.


One the eve of each new season, the Northern Irishman is believed to pick out the names of three players he feels will cost Liverpool over the course of the campaign.


These are then written down and stored in sealed envelopes in a Fileofax on Rodgers' desk.
In past years, the Reds boss has opted to play safe by selecting those he knows have nowhere better to be, like Brad Jones or Jose Enrique, but changed his approach after Gerrard's slip against Chelsea last April and subsequent sabotage of England's World Cup hopes, two months later.
Rodgers was also well aware that this season could prove to be Gerrard's last, but came unstuck when he left his Melwood office unattended while making his way to a forgotten tooth-whitening appointment.


"Brendan was in a hurry and unlike usual, left his door unlocked while he was out, " a Liverpool source revealed.


"Fabio Borini was on his way there to question his lack of recent action and noticed his manager's error.


"The lads thought it'd be funny to try and find the envelopes, so they could take the piss out of Brad and Jose again, like last year. Some of them had speculated that Glen Johnson's name might also make an appearance.


"A few others, Mario (Balotelli) and Mama (Sakho), posed for selfies in Rodgers' Rosary beads, while Jordan Rossiter and Jon Flan(agan) stuck fake moustaches on photos of his family - despite Joe Allen telling them not to.


"The banter quickly stopped when they finally found the envelopes and saw Stevie's name instead. All the other lads left but he was waiting when Brendan got back.
Gerrard is said to have confronted his boss, who tried to talk his way out of the situation by explaining, in unembellished depth, why he was in fact right all along.


The long-serving midfielder was then heard to mumble: "Brendan F***ing Todger more like" as he stormed off the premises.


He is reported to have informed the staff on reception he would not be coming back.

Believable3 Unbelievable3

01 Apr 2015 20:54:49
Haha love it.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 17:14:47
How about Sterling to City for either Jovetic or Dzeko and maybe Micah Richards (if he got his body right and passed a medical)? Would prefer Jovetic being younger but Dzeko still has some good years left until Origi is consistent enough

Believable0 Unbelievable10

01 Apr 2015 23:50:55
One`s too old, on stupid wages, and not what we need, one is a sicknote a la Studge and the less said about the other, the better.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 14:11:51
Hello to all the EDS and fellow REDS

Let's hope the EDS publish this:

This season and where we end up will be the best reality check for Liverpool fans for decades.
Is Sterling a bad guy if we fail to qualify for CL, and he wants to leave?
Would you blame him for leaving, regardless of what we offer him?
Should we have re-strengthened during the window knowing we are light weight up front?

Should FSG have bankrolled the purchase of a new striker? Should we expect FSG to show a statement of intent and invest heavily in new players? Did/do they trust the present transfer committee?

So many repeated questions, I know, but they can only be answered once the season is done and dusted.
Every match becomes a 'now or never' contest and it's frustrating for fans. People are even talking about BR being replaced!
Amazing how little fans understand about football. 'BR stumbled on the new formation by accident?' the mind boggles. can we compete financially with ManU, Chelsea, Arsenal or ManC? No! So if BR gets us to the Top4 he should be given the accolade he deserves and fans to begin to learn football and not just watch and shout!

Moan over, good luck for rest of season. YNWA

Believable2 Unbelievable13

{Ed001's Note - learn football? Arrogant comment, you need to remove your head from your rectum. If Rodgers gets us top 4 he has done nothing more than he should have done and the only accolade should be the possibility of another year to try again and actually do better next time. If you think that learning football involves making excuses for failure, then you are the one in need of educating yourself.}

01 Apr 2015 15:23:49
If Rodgers had starting the season playing with the same tactics we have been doing since xmas, we would quite happily sat in the top 4

Agree14 Disagree1

01 Apr 2015 15:37:01
You are absolutely right! If he gets top 4 we should praise him and he should keep his job! BR can then revert to his favorite system again and half way through the season when we are let's say 10th, he will decide to change his system because 3 times doesn't seem to be enough for him to realize his system doesn't work. After all this, every game should be a must win, and if we are lucky we might get top 4! And since his summer spending spree got us into trouble financially, we might be tempted to sell our best players in order to buy and he can go waste that as well on players we don't really need and might come good in a couple of years, maybe even more. So yeah, let's praise a manager who might get us the absolute minimum of what should of been a year to reestablish ourselves, gone to waste!

Agree6 Disagree5

01 Apr 2015 15:30:20
'Learn football' seems harsh, I think maybe this could have be worded better. Football is game of opinion which is what divides many. But I think he does raise a fair point about stumbling upon the system etc. That just is downright unfair on him. As someone that has a coaching background, I believe he duly deserves the credit for the system change, and change in fortunes. I also believe he deserves the critiscm for not changing the system sooner, or at least changing personnel to suit the system he wanted to use.

Based on the start of our season, then a top 4 finish now is the best we can hope for, and as I've mentioned previously, I like BR, I think he's a fantastic coach 95% of the time. And he's still a young manager, learning. So unless there's a truly top class manager/coach available to us, getting rid of him makes little sense to me.

Lastly, it's not always that easy to be logical and talk 'football sense' about matters such as LFC were people are passionate and let their emotions overwhelm. It's far too easy to get carried away.

Agree0 Disagree1

01 Apr 2015 16:13:02
Should FSG have bankrolled the purchase of a new striker? Should we expect FSG to show a statement of intent and invest heavily in new players? Did/do they trust the present transfer committee?

1. FSG made available almost £120m last summer.
How much more should Rodgers have been given?

2. Rodgers could have used the money more wisely instead of spending it square pegs. Rodgers knew Suarez was leaving but he decided that Balotelli and Lambert would somehow replace the Suarez goals.

3. As stated above in point 1, FSG spent almost £120m of LFC's money on players Rodgers agreed too. If some believes that £120m does not show that FSG had intent to invest heavily then there are some very delusional people out there.

4. As usual Rodgers is exonerated

Agree4 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 16:29:00
Hello again EDS and fellow REDS

Sorry if I sounded arrogant, didn't mean to, sorry again. My point was that this is the defining season (end of it, anyway) for BR and a lot of us. Our transfers have been bad but players are beginning to come good.
So what is your solution? Sack BR and get whom? We are not the only team who's spent over £100M, are we? Spurs did and they are no better than us. BR deserves some criticism, I totally agree but what are the alternatives, Rafa maybe?
Again, sorry about the arrogance sounding in my last post, head has been taken out of the rectum and apologies has been offered.
Here's hoping for the remainder of the season. YNWA

Agree0 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - no worries mate, I understand what you were saying, even if I disagree with some of it. I think FSG made the statement of intent in the summer.}

01 Apr 2015 16:46:02
IranRed, no way. Top 3 should be minimum, and if he can't achieve that with the money spent, then he needs to go. Fans shouldn't be giving accolades for failure. "Should FSG have bankrolled the purchase of a new striker", well FSG provided major funds to bring in players. He's esstentially still working out the best system to employ those that have been brought in (these are the players he wanted), and seems to play them out of posistion week after week. He had options for a striker, but as the Eds mentioned previously, he declined them, and made last minute pokies because he panicked. He had plenty of time (and funds) to bring in a suitable striker, but he didn't did he! Why did he revert to the old system for part 1 of this season and wait till Christmas to change things!!. It was very apparent for all to see within the first few games that the system he implemented wasn't working yet continued with it. What does that tell you about BR! Additionally, the Eds have mentioned many times about the promises he made to the Owner, promises he's failed to keep.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 18:35:00
Hey IranRed in London! I may have been a bit too sarcastic in my reply, but I simply do not want BR making any major decisions after this season! IMO he has taken us back years! I don't see us having the amount of cash he had this summer for I don't know how long! The eds believe he will go next season and so do I, however, I wouldn't mind him working under a DOF. He knows the players and it would make the change in management a little less tricky let's say

Agree0 Disagree2

01 Apr 2015 18:38:27
Absolutely spot on mate.I fear Ed002 is right in saying it was a job to soon. If and I think he has just scraped it he is given another opportunity then he will be well under the spotlight. One more bad start and he has to go.

Agree3 Disagree1

01 Apr 2015 23:53:54
Rewarding failure is the reason why England will never win a thing and if LFC keep doing that, we will never win the PL in my lifetime.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 13:22:05
The news coverage of third party ownership in football today is very interesting. What are peoples thoughts - is it pure exploitation like many people are saying, or is it a legitimate way for smaller clubs to have bigger players playing for them like the Spanish and Portuguese clubs are claiming?

Believable1 Unbelievable1

01 Apr 2015 11:53:11
hey eds what is the likelyhood of BR leaving in the summer and have you got any update on the review that was happing at LFC.

cheers

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Done to death.}

01 Apr 2015 07:29:18
In your opinion ed do you feel sturridges involvement this weekend hinges on whether he can be convinced to play when not being 100%? I know it has been discussed before that he is unwilling to play unless absolutely ready. I find it hard to imagine with any sort of significant tear the medical team would even contemplate playing him. Small grade tears could heal within 10 days to 2 weeks but it is likely he would not have done much high intensity work over the past two weeks. I can only assume the medical team are happy the injury will have repaired in time, whether Sturridge is willing to push through some inevitable stiffness may be another matter.

Cheers

Believable1 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - No idea what you are talking about. The club never made any statement about his injury keeping him out for a month - it was simply the easily led fans off to the through again.}

01 Apr 2015 08:40:52
When someone posted a team with Sturridge in for Arsenal you said there will be no Sturridge Ed. No inside info then?

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - injury information is often misleading, clubs will deliberately put out information to muddy the waters, which is why I prefer not to get into that area. They often use it to trap leaks, by telling one person an injury will last a week, another it will be 2 weeks and so on. Then they can see which information is spread online and know where it is coming from. Also it can change, some injuries heal quicker than expected, some slower, it is not an exact science, it is all estimates.}

01 Apr 2015 14:51:51
Just to say I love Ed002.

Treats everyone of us the same on this site.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Apr 2015 14:52:58
To be fair Ed002 I actually made no reference to the length of recovery spouted in the media. I offered a timeline for low grade muscle tears as it is my profession. I appreciate without knowing the full extent of the injury it is impossible to know a return date.

Ed001 had replied to a post saying Sturridge had a chance to be involved this weekend and with that in mind I wondered whether he was deemed touch and go from purely an injury perspective, or whether it was more like he will be fit enough but needs convincing that he is ready given previous reports of his reluctance to play if not feeling 100%.

Probably not made myself any clearer. Given the incessant vitriol that I imagine gets posted after a liverpool loss, due you almost hope for a liverpool win as much as Chelsea?

Cheers

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - The point I was making Greggers that fans are all to keen to jump at any mention of injury without the club doctor having the opportunity to have a grope around. I am not a keen enough supporter to care too much about winning or losing. Thanks for the post.}

 
Change Consent