Liverpool Banter Archive November 11 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

11 Nov 2014 21:16:25
Eds is there any truth in reports us giving a trial before Xmas to the youngster Degaard?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - No idea, sorry.}

11 Nov 2014 19:00:08
Can't believe We're being linked with Barca RB Montoya! That's all we need another prospect from Spain.
Aspas, Alberto, Illori, Marckovich, Manquillo, Moreno, Sahin! Who ever is doing our scouting over there needs sacking. Ged

Believable3 Unbelievable5

11 Nov 2014 20:41:53
Ilori and Markovic were both from Portugal. But this is just a recycled story - we've been linked to him every window for 3 years

Agree4 Disagree0

Markovic and Ilori came from Portugal.

Agree2 Disagree0

Agree to some extent, aspas was a very poorly judged signing, signing a striker who had one above average season for an awful team in the bloody spanish league is possibly the most stupid transfer I've ever seen us do.

Alberto i believe is and still can be quality but overall was a poorly judged signing, entirely rodgers' fault, still wish he'd get a chance so not his fault. Ilori is the same, poorly judged to buy and not been given a chance.

Markovic was just bought because other teams wanted him even though we could all see the exact kind of overly hyped player he was, and we wanted to flash our cash around a bit.

Manquillo has proved successful and was actually the kind of signing we should be looking for, moreno was a steal at 12 million and will come good.

Sahin is a quality player and was simply utilised comoletely wrong by the manager. While i don't agree with his comments and handling of the situation, sahin was correct in rodgers playing him out of position and being stubborn git.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Which other teams do you think wanted Markovic?}

Woo get them facts boy.

Agree1 Disagree0

Well, we know that chelsea weren't interested despite a cut-price deal. Should have sent some signals to Rodgers and the awful committee but no.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Nov 2014 18:02:27
One thing is for certain when thinking about our ongoing defensive problems Kelly and Wisdom wouldn't have done any worse at centre-back than what we have at the moment.

Believable9 Unbelievable3

11 Nov 2014 18:46:33
You've not been watching Wisdom at West Brom, then?!

Agree5 Disagree4

Of course they would, the problem is the lack of coaching and tactics not the players. All our CBs are internationals and know how to do their job, it's the management and coaching that's the problem.

Agree8 Disagree0

Sorry Mcgoveb but Lovren has been poor along with Skrtel and Johnson. How they are 1st team regulars is totally beyond me.

Skrtel and Johnson will not be offered new contracts which can only be a good thing for our defence.

I would have kept Martin Kelly. injury prone but a proper defender.

Agree3 Disagree6

11 Nov 2014 20:42:22
Skrtel has a new contract last year

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Nov 2014 22:23:25
Any idea how far away Flanno is from returning, he brings a bit more passion and drive to the back line

Agree2 Disagree0

Kelly and Wisdom, good enough? Don't make me laugh.

Agree2 Disagree2

Fully agree

Agree1 Disagree0

It doesn`t matter who we get, that defensve syatem and BR`s inability to rectify the situation going 3 yrs will make them look terrible. Toure, Lovren, Sahko were very good players b4 they came here. Now, they are poor. Why`s that?

Agree0 Disagree0

When every single player in our team is adjudged to be in 'poor form', it can't come down to the fact that players are bad. There must be internal issues in coaching and in particular our tactics that have not been resolved, and that is down to Rodgers sadly.

Agree0 Disagree0

Wisdom and Kelly have been excellent this season. I'd say it's you lot who've obviously not been watching them! They've both offered way more going forward than either Johnson or Manquillo. However as some people rightly pointed out, they're not playing in a shambolic team suffering from managerial ineptitude.

Agree1 Disagree0

Wisdom and Kelly might not be the answer but would they be any worse than Johnson and Manquillo? It is very hard to argue they are any worse. So why loan one and why not sell the other or at least get his wages of the books? Makes perfect sense to me!

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Nov 2014 17:41:24
Playing Devils advocate for a second. Is it better to get eliminated from champions league this year and enter the europa league. Thus giving us two different point of entry into the champions league next season. Because it is quite apparent we are not going to win the champions league and the odds of us reaching a top four position seems to be depreciating by every game we play in the league.

Believable1 Unbelievable4

11 Nov 2014 18:08:06
Good point penguin but the way we r playing we will come last in r group unless there's improvement soon let's hope.

Agree0 Disagree1

As it stands we are not ready for Europa League either. Domestics only would be a blessing in disguise !

Agree3 Disagree0

11 Nov 2014 21:56:49
I don't see us winning the Europa League either, though. I'd rather qualify for the CL knockouts.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Nov 2014 09:39:21
I would certainly prefer to win the Europa league than make it through to the knockout stages of the champions league then get knocked out at the first stage.

I know it's not glamorous, but I like watching Liverpool play and I'd rather watch us win games and a trophy than watch us get tonked by Bayern,
Obviously also means we'll play CL again next season, based on league form right now we'd be lucky to grab a Europa spot, so winning EL for me represents our best chance of competing in the champions league next year.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Nov 2014 11:14:14
WelshBoyDave

There are far better teams than us in the Europa League

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Nov 2014 22:31:31
I don't doubt it mate, not for one moment, but it has to be slightly easier to win that, right? Plus it's a hypothetical question anyway,

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Nov 2014 17:34:50
I think we really need to give suso a Chance

Believable9 Unbelievable1

I'm not sure at this point he even wants a chance at Liverpool anymore. Bit late now, should have been given a chance last season really.

Agree2 Disagree0

I believe he's injured for a month or so. But I do agree, he deserves a chance.

Agree5 Disagree0

Is he back from injury yet?

Agree0 Disagree0

BR wouldn't play him when he was fit and had a good pre-season, I think his chance is gone. This is another problem with keeping BR in his position, we could lose really good players as he looks for money to buy more "prospects for the future"

Agree6 Disagree0

It seems he has beef w/ certain players and likes certain players hence, those he ikes play, those who could be better BUT not his favs, don`t play regardless of circumstance. That`s not football, that`s politics. I would understand if those he likes play and win games but they`re not and in fact, they`ve been. That`s just disgusting. Just my opinion

Agree1 Disagree0

BR needs to be the bigger person and just do what's right sometimes.
I think he sometimes overlooks players not because they are poor but because he 1. holds favourites and 2. has made a pre judgement on a player and won't go back even if his thinking was short sighted, players like Lucas & Suso who we all as on lookers see the team would benefit from. I have no doubt that if Suso was given a proper chance at the beginning of the season, he would have had a bigger impact than Markovic. Same goes for the previous season when we loaned in Moses.

Agree1 Disagree0

Spot on, Hyach!

Agree0 Disagree0

Rodgers last season picked players on form mainly.
Flanagan came into the side and stayed in because his form was terrific.
Compare that with Toure and how he was treated when he played well in Madrid and was subsequently dropped and its easy to see why the squad does not seem to have the same togetherness this season as it had last season.

Agree1 Disagree0

According to the Eds, Flanno only got to play because there was nobody else to play LB due to injuries and lack of cover. Now, he wants to take the credit while if someone was available, Flanno would never have seen the field.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Nov 2014 16:15:40
Quick one for Ed01 if he's about;

I've seen a lot of talk about potential replacements should Rogers leave, but one name I haven't seen is Lucian Favre. what do you think of the current Borussia Mönchengladbach as a potential successor should things not improve under BR?

Many Thanks in advance for the reply mate.

Razor

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - I haven't followed his career closely at all, sorry. I don't know enough about him as a manager to really give any kind of opinion.}

He`s a journeyman manager who`s been up and down throughout his career. That`s about all I know.

Agree0 Disagree0

Journeyman? he's only been at 3 clubs in the past 10 years! He's been at Borussia Mönchengladbach just shy of 4 years. Very Successful managing in Switzerland and currently has Gladbach sitting 2nd in the Bundasliga. Known for playing attacking football and bringing through young players. Thanks for the honest answer though Ed.

Agree0 Disagree0

He`s been coaching longer than 10 yrs, bro.

Agree0 Disagree0

Never said he hadn't "bro", just pointing out how many clubs he has been at in the past 10 years.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Nov 2014 15:11:08
begovic is a must in january, he knows the league + is top keeper.
Mignolet/jones are not up to standard, mignolet has no command and too nervous.
We need strurridge to return at least we will have fire power upfront and maybe balotelli will be better with daniel around him.
We need to make top 4 this season in order to stengthen the squad with a top cb and top defensive midfielder.
orogi will come up front we will be ok.
Malta

Believable2 Unbelievable6

11 Nov 2014 16:45:41
You can put Neuer in goal and we will still concede.
Simon may not be a world beater , but he is not a bad keeper either, don't know where you stand on the Madrid game, but many here thought the team put out was the best thing ever, well Mingo was part of that team and if you just watch the first half again , you will see if it was n't for him, we would've been 3 down in the first 30 minutes.
The system is wrong, its an an offensive system that is dysfunctional, in all offensive systems if not implemented right the defence will suffer, gaps all over the place and make it a walk in the park for the opposition.
I hope we don't waste money on the back line , more than enough is spent already, we need to put whatever we have into a formidable striker that put fear in the opposition, and raise the spirit and confidence of the rest of team. Only then this mysterious system of Rodgers will work.

Agree7 Disagree2

I doubt Begovic would come as he didn't want to last time and I don't think anything has changed in the interim.

Personally before punting on Mignolet I would punt on Archterberg to see if another coach may actually do something to help him actually improve on the areas he's weak in.

Agree2 Disagree1

Rodgers needs to manage the team properly and adapt the playing style and tactics to suit the squad he has.
The players at his disposal are more than good enough to be challenging for the top couple of places.
If he can't or is unwilling then a change of manager is needed.
We need to stop blaming migs for the defence.

Agree3 Disagree2

Hey MiIKEY, BR hasn't done it till now, 11 league games, champions league, Cup, pre season and training and still no improvement.
So how long do you think he should get?

Agree3 Disagree1

You could argue he managed the team properly last year to get the most out of what he had (SAS).
He needs to adapt the team to cope with the loss of Suarez. Play to your strengths.

Agree2 Disagree0

Roy and RDL are spot on. You can put Neuer or Kahn (in his hey day) in goal and we woulds still concede as much as we are due to that dreadful and dysfunctional system we play in under BR. As for Mingo, he`s been decent and better in recent games. Changing GK`s and defenders will NEVER work until systems, coaching and other parts of the game are fixed or improved, IMO.

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Nov 2014 18:28:10
redohio,
I agree, in fact they could both be in goal together & still not stop the current rot

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Nov 2014 14:53:30
Hi Eds 001 & 002, please forgive the questions but I have to ask. If we were to terminate BR's contract how much would it cost us? It seems to me that if the club did get rid of him without due contractual cause it would cost around £15m to £20m. Could we even afford a termination that costly? Does BR (seeing that assurances were given) have conditions in his latest contract that would allow an early termination without penalty to the club?

Believable1 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - You are just making the numbers up. And I really have no interest in discussing anything financial Reynard.}

11 Nov 2014 12:38:42
I know you say no ins this jan unless we sell big first but are we in for a gk on loan at least or are we sticking with mignolet until the summer? Also is cabaye available on loan?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I am not sure who has been telling you that stuff, but a GK would likely still be on the cards. Cabaye will not be available on loan to Liverpool.}

11 Nov 2014 12:23:40
Eds, who do you rate higher, Begovic or Lloris and Why? And who would suit us more?

Believable2 Unbelievable2

{Ed001's Note - Begovic is a better keeper, but Lloris is much better at distributing the ball for quick attacks. I think Lloris would suit us better.}

Shot stopping: Begovic.
One on ones: Lloris
Command of the area: Begovic
Distribution: Lloris
Handling: Begovic
Reflex saves: Lloris


I literally cannot split them personally. I'd say lloris purely because (as Ed001 says) he suits more attacking football due to the fact he is a sweeper keeper more comfortable in one on one situations and good at starting attacks from the back.

Agree1 Disagree9

Ed01 I've thought for a while now that spurs and outselves have the wrong keepers. Lloris would suit us better, no chance?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I wish.}

Lloris would be brilliant but there is no way Spurs would sell for anything less than 20 million GB, especially to a rival. We should have used the Lovren money to buy a quality GK, and kept Agger.

Agree2 Disagree3

Begovic has been on some shocking form for the last 2 season compared to 2011/12, Got to go with LLoris who pretty much stops Spurs being embarrassed at times.

Agree3 Disagree0

11 Nov 2014 14:08:38
No decent keeper will want to come in and play for us atm.

Agree3 Disagree0

'Supermario, no decent tea lady would come to us at the moment !!

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Nov 2014 20:25:42
Haha molby, I heard the bin men were refusing to pick the bags up from outside last week.

Agree0 Disagree0

No GK will improve us if he is exposed as much as Mingo always is. Sometimes, I feel sorry for him like I did on Sat, facing 4 Chelsea players during the corner and he STILL made the saves albeit, the last one was over the line.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Nov 2014 04:26:51
Thanks Ed and the others for your opinion. To me Begovic looks safer than Lloris. But Lloris is the better distributor. So can't really decide between the two :)

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - you are welcome mate.}

11 Nov 2014 11:23:01
Anybody else get the impression that Brendan often makes substitutions for the sake of it? by that i mean he just throws players on and hopes something will happen, instead of having, well i don't know - A Plan.

Believable2 Unbelievable3

No I think he has a plan, just not the one that's needed half the time.

Agree1 Disagree2

Random Red, i have been thinking the same thing. Taking Coutinho off for Allen when we needed a goal was just stupid. U only make such a substitution when u have the lead and want to hold onto possession. Allen hardly offers anything in the final third. If Coutinho was tiring, Lallana was hands down the better option to bring on.

Agree3 Disagree4

11 Nov 2014 15:02:59
I disagree that he doesn't have a plan in the subs, I just question whether the plans are realistic. Bringing on Allen is an obvious attempt to take control of the midfield and push forward with some possession but vs a midfield of that quality, is that really likely to work?

Agree1 Disagree2

11 Nov 2014 10:48:15
we flew to Russia to close off the deal for Konoplyanka, it fell through. Why did we not go back for him when he played brilliant from Jan onwards? I understand his cost is £12 million and we need a proper winger with pace?
Amazed by our useless recruitment strategy.

Believable8 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - especially as he was so keen to join us!}

I remember hearing (possibly on this site even) that it was because once we sealed Champions League football, we decided we could attract better, which led us to Markovic instead

Agree3 Disagree0

Morsey, kono was another trick we missed, good price 12million, ready, along with others he wouldve hit the ground running! Why?. Crazy!,

Agree1 Disagree0

I still think not signing konoplyanka was a big mistake as he would have been a great player for our system. also he was cheap and was in great form. but we couldn't sign him. Ed001, what was the reason behind our failure to sign him?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Try the search function.}

11 Nov 2014 10:19:22
Eds reds lots of articles, rumours regarding possible strikers for january, I know what's been said about the money etc, but if by selling players or whatever way, if we could sign a strike partner for sturridge, if balo can't hack it whrn studge returns, who would you sign?

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - I wouldn't. I would give Lambert a chance and look to the youth players to provide a spark off the bench if that isn't working after an hour.}

Ed01 how would you want us set up if you had sturridge and lambert upto thanks.p

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - Lambert off Sturridge. Lambert is a very creative player, he can bring others into play, let him drop into the hole and do that.}

Unfortunately it looks like Rodgers doesn't trust Lambert.

Agree0 Disagree0

Rodgers has no bottle. He'd rather play it safe and blame the players for underperforming.

A truly good manager makes changes to his team based on form and ability. Rodgers would rather just keep it the same so he can't be blamed. Sadly for him, people are starting to see through him.

About a 6-8 weeks ago i put a post up calling for Rodgers to be sacked and De Boer to replace him. I did think afterwards that perhaps i was over reacting and being too quick to write him off. I'm starting to think i wasn't far wrong though!

Agree4 Disagree4

''Unfortunately it looks like Rodgers doesn't trust Lambert.''

insert
Unfortunately it looks like Rodgers is being a t!t*.

Agree4 Disagree0

Ed01 again I agree with you over lambert, the trouble is a lot of problems seem to have a solution when sturridge retutns, I hope that's the case and he can stay fit because we need him! Thanks.

Agree0 Disagree0

Well said EMS. A world class manager would take all the blame on himself, to keep his players out of the firing line. Just look at Jose, hardly any of his Chelsea players get into the spotlight for poor performances. He is more than willing to soak up the pressure from the media than blame each and every player of his if the team under performs. BR on the other hand uses excuses (that too ridiculous ones) to deflect the blame from himself. There is no way a manager like Ancelotti or Mourinho would let their players get slaughtered by the media.

Agree1 Disagree1

Indian, do you not remember the debacle about old players last year from Mourinho and the reasons he keeps his mouth shut about reffing decisions?

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Nov 2014 15:49:43
Or throwing Hazard to the dogs after the Atheltico game where they went out of the CL? Or his comments about Lukaku (who granted was on loan but still technically his player at that point).

Agree0 Disagree0

I think the point was mourinho is a lot better at dealing with the press and deflecting attention from his players than Rodgers.

Agree0 Disagree0

I'd have liked to have read the total column inches dedicated to Mourinhos attack force last year, and Torres and bothered to read the articles from his time at real madrid.
There' no doubting Mourinho is a good manager, the man clearly has his flaws when talking about officials and some players. Torres still got his usual flack last year.

Agree1 Disagree0

Spot on, EMS! As much as I hate to say it, I think BR has become a politician i.e takes the credit for everything and takes the blame for nothing.

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent