08 Jun 2015 11:58:30
Ings scored 1 goal more than lukaku yet is costing us 22m less and wants to play for us. This equals fans moaning like hell. Not all i know. Imagine the internet in the 70s and 80s bloody hell. Whoa this rushie bloke from chester he's poo. Omg were replacing keegan with dalglish have you seen celtic play. Weve sold our best striker and now getting aldrige from lowly oxford ffs.

1.) 08 Jun 2015
08 Jun 2015 12:24:26
Difference being we had managers who knew what they were doing back then. Rodgers has done nothing but prove he doesn't know what he's doing.

2.) 08 Jun 2015
08 Jun 2015 12:48:47
Lukaku scored 20 in all comps mate.

3.) 08 Jun 2015
08 Jun 2015 12:57:56
The ccomparison to Lukaku is irrelevant. Ings is a good player, and most people will have already told you that. Like them, I am most concerned with whether he can step up. Every season, LFC go around picking up "bargains" they are sure will play like a £25 million player, but they end up getting burned. This is the prevalent experience, and the one the fans want to avoid, hence the concern.

4.) 08 Jun 2015
08 Jun 2015 12:59:37
Some fan's can hardly call themselves fan's. We've always bought strikers from the lower leagues. Rush and aldo were outstanding john barnes came from Watford best no 10 we ever had

5.) 08 Jun 2015
08 Jun 2015 13:55:05
Sure, let's bring up things from 30 years back, that's relevant. NOT.

6.) 08 Jun 2015
08 Jun 2015 14:01:59
Kevin Keegan is another

7.) 08 Jun 2015
08 Jun 2015 14:06:10
But lukaku is crap haha

8.) 08 Jun 2015
08 Jun 2015 15:11:13
Si, signing John Barnes from warford is hardly comparable to Ings. He was a well established player who was signed for a big fee. Every top team would have wanted him at the time. Us and spurs are the only team in the top 6 showing any interest in Ings and he's basically on a free. I don't disagree that he has potential but all we did last year was buy a squad full of potential.