20 Dec 2015 05:29:29
Regarding Benteke, Chelsea already took Fernando off our hands for silly money and got burned. Given we paid 32.5 million for him only months ago Chelsea would surly have to get near that figure to buy him which seems pricey given current form. Personally I don't think he suits our style as a club, or suits the other players we have. We want a technically excellent wee guy up top in the dalglish/fowler mould. Klopp deserves some money to spend, so let's hope Big Ben goes russian and klopp has a gem to replace him in mind.

1.) 20 Dec 2015
20 Dec 2015 06:13:09
Benteke deserves at least a season at the club to prove himself. I was one of the many who didn't want him in the first place but we need to support him now he is a LFC player. But i do agree with u that he is not the answer to our goal scoring problems. We overpaid massively for him and i really do not see Chelsea or any other club for that matter paying that sort of money for him. If they do in January, then he should be sold and replaced with someone who Klopp actually wants.

2.) 20 Dec 2015
20 Dec 2015 09:08:38
Hes had his chance too slow too lazy .

3.) 20 Dec 2015
20 Dec 2015 09:30:16
If we do sell him, let's hope it is not on deadline day and then go out and panic buy a replacement.

4.) 20 Dec 2015
20 Dec 2015 09:49:50
ya I had to agree with Ed 02 regarding this matter! Some Liverpool fans are absolute disgrace!

come on! sell a guy who hasn't even completed a single season, who was injured for quite a bit, who had to adjust in a new team, under a new manager, in a new system!

its plain ridiculous!

5.) 20 Dec 2015
20 Dec 2015 10:23:24
Collins it isn't about getting rid. If it is true and Chelsea come in with a significant offer the club has to look at its options I. e is there players in January available that would improve us and whether benteke should be kept. But it is all hearsay.
Wouldn't mind any money coming in saved on a mahrez bid 😉.

6.) 20 Dec 2015
20 Dec 2015 10:49:04
Lacazette is the player i want us to spend the money on (if Benteke is sold of course) . Very versatile player and good pace with movement. He could be for us what Vardy is to Leicester. Unfortunately with Benteke, we cannot play the high intensity football if our main striker remains rooted to one spot for 89 minutes of the game.

7.) 20 Dec 2015
20 Dec 2015 10:57:56
Damn right we should listen to offers for benteke if reports are true ( although I don't believe them) .

Lads it's not about fans being disrespectful its the fact that he should never have been bought.

The style we want to play doesn't suit benteke when he plays we never look like getting around the back of the of the defence, instead we cross the ball to fifty pence p head who's being marked by 3 defenders.

8.) 20 Dec 2015
20 Dec 2015 11:01:52
Where have these rumours come from?
I can't see Chelsea wanting Benteke, but if they did I would sell for anything over £30m.
Benteke hasn't had long. This is true and he hasn't done too bad; but he doesn't really fit in our system. He's very static especially when we haven't got the ball. He would have to be replaced as Sturridge has too many injuries and Ings is out for the season.
I'd prefer a loan signing, can't think of any names though.

9.) 20 Dec 2015
20 Dec 2015 12:11:45
This is wrong, give Benteke time.

10.) 20 Dec 2015
20 Dec 2015 09:04:31
Apparently the rules applies to Chelsea as well. They would have s new manager in the summer, y would they buy a striker now?

11.) 20 Dec 2015
20 Dec 2015 15:27:35
Actually i feel our answer up front could be Ings.

12.) 20 Dec 2015
20 Dec 2015 17:19:12
Indian Buzzer,

What has Lacazette done this year?

He's been ordinary at best and not the second coming like some fans on here think he is.

Benteke has 4 goals and Lacazette has 6 goals.

Really nothing in it.