26 Feb 2015 15:27:44
Not entirely sure on the reliability but read that CFCB investigations into Liverpools FFP breaches will end in no sanctions on friday apparently because of losses associated with stadium costs from the former owners not being applicable.

Hull are to be fined a small amount as they played the opening Europa league qualifying rounds. Inter, Roma, Monaco and Sporting Lisbon (this surprised me I have always thought SL were financially well run) are to continue being investigated.

Don't shoot the messenger, just passing on what I have read.

1.) 26 Feb 2015
26 Feb 2015 16:49:57
So liverpool fc saying that they were unconcerned about the ffp investigation were probably right great news from the echo

2.) 26 Feb 2015
26 Feb 2015 17:00:56
I read a similar article in the Guardian.

3.) 26 Feb 2015
26 Feb 2015 17:02:04
it isn't clear from the last accounts what the the breaches are (if any) and I expect the next accounts - due to be filed and available next week to show a significant improvement over previous years - break even/small profit due to increases in revenue not matched by increases in player wages, amortisation and write offs. I am not sure the insistence that we are in continued breach of ffp is accurate. One of the tenets of ffp is that clubs can be let off if they demonstrate improvement in their financial situation and I explect this to be the case with LFC for the 13/14 financial year. We shall see.
I will be happy with at least a win and two draws from our next 3 matches. (win the win in the PL)
Cmon red men

4.) 26 Feb 2015
26 Feb 2015 17:18:08
I would imagine it's a very close thing either way (with respect to our adherence to FFP). That said, moving forward it means we likely won't be seeing large net spends in transfer windows, which I think is the broader point. Compare to say Chelsea who are also selling to buy but have unneeded assets of a much higher value than we do they can sell to generate income.