Liverpool Rumours Member Posts


Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

Paypal single or recurring donation

(single word yields best result)
Ed046 is placing football tips on our Bets site

waynechai's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



waynechai's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To waynechai's Posts



To waynechai's last 5 banter posts


To waynechai's last 5 rumour replies


To waynechai's last 5 banter replies


waynechai has no Rumours Posts



waynechai's banter posts with other poster's replies to waynechai's banter posts


22 Sep 2020 09:20:32
Had been a fantastic window so far from Football angle. I am almost certain we will go into market for a centre back.
If DC is a too target, I think we will get him.

The window can then only be enhanced with outgoing.
I am keen to see the following gone to balance the book:
1. Wilson
2. Grujic
3. Origi
4. Gini
5. Nat Philip (of Matip if we can get better money and if we get DC)

I do hope we keep Shaq and Brewster.
Shaq has much more quality and Brewster potential.
But I would think a first half season loan for Brewster would be good since we are not having that many games as yet.


1.) 22 Sep 2020 09:42:43
I really don't understand why so many people want rid of Origi.

You'd keep Shaqiri ahead of Origi? each to their own of course mate but I don't quite get that.

2.) 22 Sep 2020 09:56:16
Before the C. V outbreak, Eds said that Sevilla wanted €75m in a single payment for Diego Carlos. I don't think that stance would change much significantly so maybe he wouldn't be attainable this window.

Also I wasn't convinced by him whatsoever in the EL. His partner Kounde looked better and is much younger.

So actually I would love for you to sign DC for that huge amount and then prove to be not as good as Gomez lol.

3.) 22 Sep 2020 10:49:19
I'm not sure if Origi would get many minutes this season. Last season with all his minutes added up he only played around 9 games in the league and with Minamino appearing to be ahead of him and Jota signed i think those minutes would continue to decrease.

4.) 22 Sep 2020 11:28:55
Because Origi is the worst player in our squad. Legend for the goals he has scored the last 2 seasons and cult hero but clearly clearly not good enough for Liverpool.

5.) 22 Sep 2020 11:22:32
Origi has scored big goals in big moments. He was a very important player in our CL win. Especially considering he wasn’t playing regularly, to be able to step up like that is huge!

Honestly, people will miss him when he’s gone. Replacing a player like that, who can perform when needed and be decisive in games despite being on the bench most of the time, is very difficult.

6.) 22 Sep 2020 11:35:20
I would keep Shaq over Origi if I had to pick one, yeah. We've got Jota now as a LF/ CF so Shaq is more useful to cover the right side while Elliot is coming through. Elliot even reminds me of Shaq. In a year's time then we can sell Shaq and Elliot will be more ready. This is also why we don't need Sarr now and I don't believe for a minute we'll sign him this window.

7.) 22 Sep 2020 14:19:17
My thoughts exactly Jurgen Meister, Shaq provides more needed cover on the right and I don't really rate origi on the wings tbh. It's not to say he's not a good footballer, just that we've got better players in his position imo.

8.) 22 Sep 2020 18:58:52
"Because Origi is the worst player in our squad". BigVirg, make up your mind. You say this about Origi (which is utter rubbish, IMO) while at the same time, call him a Legend for scoring big goals in big games. You are aware that you cannot be the worst player in a squad and be a legend at the same time. So which is it? It definitely cannot be both.




waynechai's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

17 Oct 2020 09:55:49
Grino75, I agree with you.
In fat, think about players who Liverpool willingly let go, any of them went on to do big things? Probably none. Unlike Sancho, De Bruyne, etc.
Think about Ibe, Solanke, and many more.
Prove 2 things,
1. Liverpool does well in letting go players who can’t make it.
2. Liverpool doesn’t develop enough good enough players.




Click To View This Thread

20 Sep 2020 07:18:21
Keita is being slagged and Kewell was brought into the picture.
Honestly, when those transfers happened, weren’t we fans excited?
Too bad it didn’t turned out the way we want.
There might yet be time for Keita. I just hope we do not lose too much money if it doesn’t. Benteke was not too bad a transfer in that we don’t lose money (although that one, I wasn’t excited from the beginning)
Grujic, extremely harsh to label that as a failure. I would say it is a good buy since we are likely going to make a profit out of it.




Click To View This Thread

27 Jul 2020 14:41:43
Origi, when taking over from any of the front 3, seldom impress. Maybe me does need a run of games, but he is not going to get it at LFC.
Only way is if 1 of our front 3 get injured say for a month (6games or so) . Would you really be confident that Origi is now your starter?
I know my answer.
Minus that performance against Everton, he has not really impressed.
Mason Greenwood was not a tarter and burst through all right. Origin has failed to do so for 3-4 Seasons now.
I say let him go.
I do rather have Brewster, although I had been hoping for Werner.




Click To View This Thread

26 Jul 2020 03:05:40
I think indeed, it is a great opportunity if fund permit to get a first choice CB, not the 4th.
Remember, Matip can’t be relied upon to stay fit.
I would demote him to the 4th, and even 5th if any of the youngster will step up.
Between JG, VD and this new signing, they would take 2 slots.
And god forbid, what if JG or VD get injured? Rely on Matip?
Whatever has been said about Louvren, he is an extremely capable 4th choice, and together with Matip, they provide very good cover most of the time.
To get a 4th choice of his calibre, I am not particularly positive.

Can anyone name me a 4th choice CB in any club which you would take in place of Louvren?




Click To View This Thread

15 May 2020 04:04:40
Ed25 called it as it is. I like it!





waynechai's banter replies


Click To View This Thread

06 Jun 2017 04:08:24
Good point.
In an ideal world, I would love to have 2 new full backs.
One in each flank.
It is a pity that Moreno doesn't work out, Clyne not the kinds of full back we need, and Milner has his shortcoming.
And TAA in my opinion is also not quite there yet.
I would probably sell Clyne and Moreno, with Milner and TAA as back up.

P. S. thought Moreno should have been more a chance against the lesser team, ahead of Milner, and see if that's what we need, that is speed, a bit more skill going forward and ability to go to the byline and cutback or crosses. Now we never know.




Click To View This Thread

03 May 2017 06:23:46
When did ed001 called Clyne a weak link? I missed that, but it echoed my thoughts exactly. Even Milner outshone Clyne as a fullback, and that said a lot.

He see a lot fight balls going forward, but has done precious nothing with it, no taking it to the byline and cross, and in facet the less said about his crossing the better.
Had not seen him being a menace on the ball like a Johnson was.

I have seen many goals (and ed, your footage will help) where crosses come in from the left, or second ball falling into our right, that Clyne is not tracking an incoming attacker.

The one plus point about Clyne is his fitness though, as in he seldom get injured.


{Ed001's Note - he is very quick and strong as well.}