Liverpool Rumours Archive July 08 2016

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

08 Jul 2016 19:36:17
M. Sakho's case dismissed according to Sky. Great News for him and Lfc. Push on now and look forward to next season.

Believable34 Unbelievable9

08 Jul 2016 21:45:00
Excellent news. love this guy. Would of ended the season a lot better with him and Henderson fit and able.

Agree26 Disagree6

08 Jul 2016 22:16:20
Good stuff, let's hope he stays here too!

Agree11 Disagree5

09 Jul 2016 10:15:09
The Europa final may have been different too. Ah well, onwards and upwards.

Agree3 Disagree9

{Ed023's Note - All ifs and buts but didn't the fella who replaced him getting Liverpool's man of the match?}

09 Jul 2016 10:32:45
I didn't realise coke replaced sakho.

Agree3 Disagree9

{Ed023's Note - Does Coke play for Liverpool? Read what I actually wrote and come back to me}

09 Jul 2016 10:43:03
Hahaha well played eds.

Agree4 Disagree4

09 Jul 2016 10:43:05
@Ed23 why even bother hah?

Agree7 Disagree4

{Ed023's Note - Just wanted to point out what I said, some people don't bother to read properly but I do agree with you}

09 Jul 2016 09:45:10
An absolute disgrace. The poor guy missed out on the Europa League final and the Euros because of UEFA and it's "we are right and you are always wrong" attitude. I can't remember any other time when they backed down on a case. Having said all that they still aren't as bad as the FA.
Sakho is like a new signing at this stage as I presumed he was looking at a two to three year suspension.

Agree2 Disagree7

09 Jul 2016 11:18:38
He's got a right to be seriously pissed off but I imagine there is also a sense of relief that this is finished with.

Agree5 Disagree1

09 Jul 2016 11:48:56
Koke- the other one was more Merson's cup of tea 😉.

Agree2 Disagree5

09 Jul 2016 12:36:39
Yes I feel sorry for him, but Toure was by far our best player in his absence, so people need to get over it.

Agree0 Disagree3

09 Jul 2016 11:36:33
Have to agree ed kolo was easily man of the match, I don't think sakho playing would have made a difference, quick question mate, would you UEFA have a case to answer for sakho personally for deformation of character?

Agree0 Disagree2

{Ed023's Note - I doubt they will bother and to be honest I'm not bothered what they do I'm just delighted Sakho resume his Liverpool career.

09 Jul 2016 12:44:43
Always had a gut feeling that there was nothing to see here after UEFA seemed confused about if the substance was supposed to be on the banned substance list to begin with. The good news just keeps coming. Great stuff!

Agree1 Disagree2

08 Jul 2016 10:55:40
Rafael Camacho will sign in the next few days from Man City.

vrcomp
Y. N. W. A.

Believable7 Unbelievable27

08 Jul 2016 11:53:40
Youth player for anyone who is interested. Apparently similar to Coutinho.

Never seen him play though so no idea how good he is. 16 years old though, so patience will be required.

Agree12 Disagree1

08 Jul 2016 12:48:50
MK you should be aware by now that our supporters will expect him to be starting every match and if he doesn't he will be regarded a flop.

Agree24 Disagree2

08 Jul 2016 17:18:18
He is already a flop. For reasons.

Agree4 Disagree8

09 Jul 2016 11:19:08
Probably never see him in the first team so irrelevant really.

Agree1 Disagree1

09 Jul 2016 15:53:59
People said the same about Stewart when we signed him, Whenthereds.

Agree1 Disagree1

08 Jul 2016 08:12:00
Just seen a report suggesting we will look at bringing in Anderson talisca when benteke moves on! Have the eds heard anything? Liked the mystery over ballotelli and sampdoria, I can only hope it includes Muriel, not that I know much of him but he's got to be better than ballotelli!

Believable3 Unbelievable25

08 Jul 2016 09:14:35
This has to be an Ed's kryptonite. Random name to replace a player we need not replace. Swap deal including another random name you admittedly know nothing about. Just why?

Agree24 Disagree2

08 Jul 2016 09:52:17
@DMJ What a load of rubbish

"I can only hope it includes Muriel, not that I know much of him but he's got to be better than ballotelli! "

So, you can only hope that we offset any money we might receive by somehow taking a random player you admittedly know nothing about just for the sake of it?! Is this a windup?

Agree14 Disagree1

08 Jul 2016 12:22:54
Crazy replies to crazy post. Where u guys get the energy?

Agree6 Disagree5

08 Jul 2016 13:53:21
If you watch hits games for benfica he plays as a b2b centre mid who occasionally plays more advanced. got to question the motivation of 22yo already being linked with China . Good player though.

Agree0 Disagree4

{Ed002's Note - Sounds like news from nearly two years ago and another target of Rogers. Benfica's Anderson Talisca was subject to the interest of Chelsea, Zenit St Pete, Arsenal and Liverpool in late 2014.}

08 Jul 2016 13:40:44
Paper talk. I hope you read the price quoted in that article €25 mill for someone who scored 9 in 43 appearance.
We simply don't need another striker.

Agree1 Disagree4

08 Jul 2016 14:48:51
1 bad egg out and you want another straight in to replace.

Luis Muriel seems to have problems akin to those Balotelli creates. He's moved around some clubs already.

Has so much ability but head is not right. Di Natale said of his time mentoring Alexis Sanchez at Udinese that, there is another guy even more promising if he could only sort his head out (Muriel) .

Hasn't seemed to have sorted it and like Balo seems to suffer from Collymoreitis - all the ability but if the mind ain't right.

That's all I remember about. He is quite good on FIFA though so I am surmising that is why people seem optimistic of him 😼.

Agree0 Disagree3

09 Jul 2016 03:58:25
Muriel's done better since joining sampdoria. Regaining the form he had in his earlier years in the Serie A, but that is where he should stay. I suspect he will be a late bloomer like Eder and by the time he reaches his late 20's, will start to shine.

Agree0 Disagree1

09 Jul 2016 14:08:19
I'm a long time reader and first time poster but as stated above this "rumour" has it all. Probably my favourite post ever on this site for utter, media drivel, daily mail-level uniformed ****. Hits all the points for the eds, top notch. Brilliant. Ten points. Walk on.

Agree2 Disagree1

07 Jul 2016 23:45:00
Hi eds saw earlier that we are in for wijnaldum. What's your thoughts on it?

Thanks in advance.

Believable1 Unbelievable9

{Ed001's Note - I know nothing of that and I would not welcome such an average player at the club. He is not good enough, doesn't work hard enough, doesn't bother trying often enough.}

08 Jul 2016 12:25:02
Wijnaldum is average? Woah. but at same time we ain't got clout to sign players like ribery Neymar messi? So any solution?

Agree0 Disagree8

{Ed001's Note - what do you mean woah? Have you watched him play? He was so good that he got dropped by Rafa for lacking ability and application. Immediately that happened results improved. The lad is a waster. He was a supremely talented youngster who is wasting the natural talent through lack of effort. The solution is not to buy dross like that and buy players who actually work for the team and to try and improve themselves.}

08 Jul 2016 12:48:15
The lad did score 11 goals and assisted 5 from midfield last year. Also to take in to account that it was his first year in the premier league and was in a poor newcastle team. For the right price might not be a bad buy.

Agree1 Disagree6

{Ed001's Note - stats mean nothing, he was one of the main reasons that team was so poor.}

08 Jul 2016 14:22:28
Guys. If Rafa has dropped him. He must be pony. Rafa used to start Voronin for us and he was bad.

Agree3 Disagree5

08 Jul 2016 15:05:39
He would just be another one of those flakes who blames Klopp's methods for their poor performance.

Agree2 Disagree2

08 Jul 2016 15:19:43
Let's be fair I don't think wijnaldum is as bad as your making out Newcastle conceded 65 4th worst In the league and scored 44 which isn't a bad goal tally for a relegated club and he was involved in nearly half of their goals even being benched. So I disagree I think he would be a good signing their defence ruined them and they destroyed us remember.

Agree2 Disagree3

{Ed001's Note - I am being fair, with the benefit of speaking to his coaches, both current and former, unlike yourself. He is someone to be steered clear of. If anyone was willing to take him, he would already be out the door.}

08 Jul 2016 15:58:49
i would take the eds opinion of him, the eds don't have an axe to grind they just tell it how it is and if you don't agree then that's your right to do so, but i will stick with the eds because they do this site and give us information you don't get from any where else and yes they can be wrong some of the time but not all the time and if they say he is not that good i'm inclined to believe them instead of anyone else, or the stats that don't make sense at time, just like a goal keeper who has a 100% shut out rate after coming on for the last 10 minutes, people will believe that he is a good keeper because he has the 100% shut out rate, i wonder what skertals stats were, the player can't be that good if he was relegated.

Agree1 Disagree5

08 Jul 2016 16:37:28
Well if you have the inside information that he is to be steered clear of then so be it how was I supposed to know you knew that? I was just just giving my opinion on a player that looked half decent on the pitch.

Agree2 Disagree2

09 Jul 2016 04:03:33
Rafa also dropped babel for riera/ replaced Alonso with Lucas (bless him) . what's your point?

Agree1 Disagree2

{Ed001's Note - he dropped Babel for having a terrible attitude and playing crap. Not sure why you bring him up, unless it is to show how little point there is in reading your player assessments if you rate Ryan. Nice lad, still follows us, but he was too busy trying to make it as a musician to put in the effort for us.

As for Alonso, he was not replaced by Lucas. That is simply not true.}

09 Jul 2016 13:30:25
Rafa isn't a great coach for me him dropping a attacking player seems normal

Although I don't think the lads is anywhere near the answer

We need to change and take personalities into account when bringing in player feel.

Agree0 Disagree2

09 Jul 2016 22:45:45
I personally thought he was a coach. We were brilliant in defence, good goalkeeper, solid midfield and decent attacking football. We had idiot owners and prevented him from buying some players so we ended up getting 2nd, 3rd and 4th choices instead of getting our first choice transfers.

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Jul 2016 11:03:41
The year we came second we lost it by not performing against the weaker teams, we struggled to get goals when not fielding first choice forward, during that period we had the Keane fiasco, a guy who scored bucket loads against the kind of teams we didn't produce against. Benitez seems to get a bye for his involvement in that fiasco. League was there for the winning and the use of the players available didn't help.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - there were very good reasons for Keane's benching during that period, that is why Rafa gets a bye for it.}

 
Change Consent