Liverpool Rumours Archive June 07 2017

07 Jun 2017 21:28:54
Vvd was done, saints weren't happy one of our lot ran to press so it got messy.

07 Jun 2017 22:07:55
If that's true they just screwed themselves as reportedly we where the highest bidder at the time. Maybe they thought we would pay them so more for comp.

End of the day its all messy.

07 Jun 2017 22:07:55
If that's true they just screwed themselves as reportedly we where the highest bidder at the time. Maybe they thought we would pay them so more for comp.

End of the day its all messy.

07 Jun 2017 22:16:20
nonsense.

07 Jun 2017 22:31:04
If that is true I think that is a major overreaction on their behalf, it was always going to be released to the media anyway! I'm just gutted : (.

08 Jun 2017 05:21:21
How can VVD deal be done if Soton never agreed to the deal? Hell we haven't even spoke to the club officially. The reports saying it was done is just rubbish.

07 Jun 2017 20:34:11
I wasn't even sold on vvd, now I'm gutted we have done what we have. All these reports of we have agreed terms but not a fee. Question though, Could legal action still be taken?

{Ed025's Note - possible but unlikely i would say fencey..

07 Jun 2017 21:31:02
If the EPL have accepted Liverpool's apology then that will be it.

Southampton not going to bother with us now when they have won the battle hands down. Doubt they will allow us to sign players from them again i. e. Fulham/ Dempsey.

Other clubs will be looking at this situation with eyes wide open.

At this point I am expecting a disappointing summer. Clubs not going to bother with our haggling anymore. We have shown our true colours now.

{Ed025's Note - come on max you know better than that mate..

07 Jun 2017 21:43:28
The fact we've apologised, I think has stopped the PL from taking it further!

07 Jun 2017 23:36:28
Eds, and please don't shoot me down as i am not making excuses, i just don't understand the severity of all this tapping stuff.

Listening to Steve Nicol today, and i am not saying he is right, and yes the rules are different now. but he was almost suggesting its all a big fuss over nothing and that if agents were not around clubs would and actually do this all the time.

{Ed002's Note - It is a very serious matter. Would you not consider it an issue if Liverpool were banned from signing first team players for a year or two? They are already dealing with one transfer ban, a damaged reputation and clubs who don't want to do business with them - not an issue at all?}

08 Jun 2017 02:13:28
Ed, why does tapping up law in football exist, when in normal life and normal business, it goes on legally? Just asking, although I think we've been idiots yet again and heads need to roll, as it is law in football.

{Ed001's Note - it is not legal in normal business.}

08 Jun 2017 06:00:39
Exactly Ed001. I work for a publishing house and under contract am not allowed to speak to another publishing house without permission. If it was done in secret my company would be well miffed with both me and the competitor.

{Ed001's Note - I know a number of people who have been 'tapped up' by other companies with various consequences. It is the same in all walks of life, if you are high enough up the food chain to matter to the company who employs you.}

08 Jun 2017 13:14:50
Is it down to whether an employee is on a set contract or not, as my wife in the past has been head hunted before a few times, when agents for the new company have contacted her, had the interview and either offered the job or not, without her present (att) company knowing anything about it happening! Do all these head hunters break the law then? Sorry Eds, I know you're all skied under this morning, which I fully appreciate, just wanted to know! I also appreciate it's law in football and if broken, you should take the penalty!

{Ed001's Note - it really depends on the job, as I said it usually comes down to how far up the food chain you are but a head hunter is, in essence, the same as an agent. Clubs/companies can speak to the agent/headhunter, but not the player/employee direct.}

08 Jun 2017 03:26:50
If English clubs do it all the time, why would only Liverpool get punished though. Other clubs (City was mentioned) did the same things as Liverpool as far as the Stoke youngster goes too. Are Liverpool the only club dumb enough to get caught? I don't get why they're the only ones getting called out on it when it's happening at every club.

{Ed002's Note - English clubs don't "do it all of the time" and Manchester City has also been sanctioned for making an illegal approach to youngsters. Liverpool's behaviour has been terrible for years - far worse than any other club. The embarrassing attempts by some of the fans to deflect this is indeed laughable. In terms of youngsters, what Liverpool did to the kid from from Stoke is certainly the worst ever behaviour I have ever encountered and it should go to court and it should be out in the public domain quite how foul the club is and the damage they have done.}

09 Jun 2017 13:24:54
These clauses in employment contracts are notoriously difficult to enforce as it can be ruled as being a restriction of trade. I know that I've experienced issues trying to enforce one when an employee has left to go to a competitor. Has a club / player ever tried to challenge it on these grounds?

07 Jun 2017 20:00:11
So EDs the £50million question on everyone's minds, do any of you have an idea of potential alternatives? I'm sure it's probably too soon to tell but any info wouldn't be appreciated.

Shame we've done this type of behaviour again, let's hope we learn from it.

Thanks

TIA19.

{Ed001's Note - nothing yet, if anything mate.}

07 Jun 2017 20:03:03
But we won't learn from it though. Clearly that won't happen.

07 Jun 2017 20:36:49
Our alternative should be Sakho as he's quality and can play at left back, Klopp should back down after this idiocy.

07 Jun 2017 20:44:18
De Vrij seems to be one. Contract is running low think he's in last year of it.

07 Jun 2017 20:54:49
Everyone knows we are willing to spend big now though, I swear by lascelles at Newcastle but I'm the only one who does.

07 Jun 2017 19:56:51
Hey eds, i know this is a shot in the dark but, stay with me on this, could this be vvd agent? He knew he wanted to go to liverpool maybe meaning lover fees and bonus, so could this be a way of him generating more money for all parties involved. I know its a far fetched idea but we all know how agent are. Ps i hear rumours of de vrij any truth. Keep up the great work guys.

{Ed001's Note - no it was not the agent messing about with it.}

07 Jun 2017 20:08:49
Sky Italia is reporting we've bid €20 million for De Vrij which Lazio has turned down. May or may not be true, but now that the entire world knows the kind of money we were looking to spend on a centre-back, any club we do business with can add a huge premium on what they might usually ask for.

What a mess.

07 Jun 2017 20:23:41
TQ, Lazio actually want 30m pounds (40m euros) for him as he has one year left on his deal and is reluctant to sign a new one. This is different from the VVD issue as he had 5 years left on his deal hence, the heavy fee.

07 Jun 2017 20:26:15
Least we made a bid this time.

07 Jun 2017 19:07:17
So according to some people, VVD was a done deal.

24hrs later, the same people are saying we haven't agreed a deal with Southampton although the player definitely wants the move. They are also saying the 'illegal approach' was a smokescreen.

48hrs later, LFC drop all interest and apologise to Southampton.

So much for the reliable sources and people in the know.

No deal was EVER agreed with Saints or the player!

Embarrassing.

{Ed025's Note - it was agreed with him and his agent sgtP, everyone assumed that the club were part of the negotiations but it turned out that that was not the case mate..

07 Jun 2017 19:33:27
Yes obviously there was something in it. It's just that it's gone wrong. Hey you know what, maybe it's for the best. Perhaps we should just stick to our original plan and not get sidetracked. I just hope we will learn the lessons and this will NEVER happen again. Not a good start to the summer! Let's hope we have a good ending!

07 Jun 2017 19:34:04
Every time macca says done deal it goes Tits up. Haha keep shush till it goes through.

07 Jun 2017 19:32:12
The fact that all this was happening and the club did not know, is criminal warranting the sacking of whoever was involved in this shambles, IMO.

{Ed025's Note - klopp was obviously involved...so sack him?

07 Jun 2017 19:50:33
He needs to be brought into line if that is the case lEd25.

This could have a serious impact on whom we sign during this transfer window. The consequences of not getting this transfer window right could have a damaging impact for many seasons to come.

In my opinion.

{Ed025's Note - you could be right nicky, im not saying its good mate just that beating the club with a big stick is not the answer..

07 Jun 2017 19:53:19
Ed025 - And why not? I am not at all saying that Klopp should be sacked for any proven offence in the VVD situation. But if it is proven that he is guilty of any sackable offence then he should be sacked, just as much as any other LFC employees guilty of a sackable offence.

{Ed025's Note - thats called...cutting your nose off to spite your face ra, rap some knuckles anmd move on i say..

07 Jun 2017 20:06:39
Those hoping for a happy ending can forget it, this isn't going to end well and I can see us getting a kicking. Not only that, but we're utterly incapable of bringing in top players so we are not going to be able to compete. We're going to a Grand Prix hoping to win in a Yugo Zastava. That's the state of our club.

07 Jun 2017 19:45:43
Is that it Ed025? Liverpool have suffered immense embarrassment because no one thought check that the other club knew? Where were the lawyers and the Admin people?

{Ed025's Note - ok then polecat, kick some arses or sack someone or maybe donate some money to a southampton hospital or something..then move on..

07 Jun 2017 20:19:17
then yes ed, its a disgrace and if klopp played his part then he has dragged our name through the mud. sorry but Liverpool is bigger than klopp.

{Ed025's Note - i think your intentions are honourable jay but if this was pep or mourinho do you think their supporters would be calling for the manager to fall on his sword?...i think not mate..

07 Jun 2017 20:22:33
To be honest ed25, Klopp should have some repercussions from this. Yes we all love him and in my opinion he is a world class manager but in any other line of work, you put your employers reputation (already poor) into more disrepute through pure incompetence (which it is no matter how our fans try and spin it), you would be in for a serious disciplinary. Very poor from all involved.

{Ed025's Note - i agree gunn its piss poor mate, discipline all involved and hand out some final warnings i say, maybe sack a lawyer or two just dont do anything that will halt the progress of the club and undo the hard work of last season as an act of contrition..

07 Jun 2017 20:26:58
Ed025, we may not sack him as that is just cutting your nose to spite your face and many other managers have done this and did not get sacked. He should be reprimanded prolly in private and be given a stern warning to stop this nonsense cos this is the second time he is doing this to my knowledge (last summer with Zeilinski) .

{Ed025's Note - i will have that brussels, cut him out of any future dealings if hes guilty and fine him 2 weeks wages and donate it to the manchester or london victims fund or similar mate, but have an internal inquiry first and not a knee jerk reaction..

07 Jun 2017 21:14:02
Yeah ed, I agree that sacking Klopp would not be beneficial to us in anyway, as you said throw some warnings / disciplinary's around and make certain that this doesn't happen again. As ed002 has said countless times we are becoming a laughing stock.

{Ed025's Note - im not playing it down gunn its a very serious matter and it has made the club look amateurish, dont throw the baby out with the bath water thats all im saying mate..

07 Jun 2017 22:49:19
All clubs are at it. you are naiive to think they don't. liverpool just stupid enough to leak everything to the press.

07 Jun 2017 23:10:26
Yeah I see what your saying ed. Thanks for the reply and looks like Edwards is the one that fsg are coming to speak to about it mate.

{Ed025's Note - im sure we will find out presently mate..

09 Jun 2017 13:41:05
Been reading this site for years and Macca has got a better percentage of things right than anybody else in the media let alone this site. He doesn't have to share what he does so turn it in! Most of us on here appreciate his input and posts like this will lose his information altogether. We're all disappointed but stuff happens its football we'll get over it!

07 Jun 2017 18:52:15
SS r saying we have pulled out of the vvd deal and apologised to Southampton.

07 Jun 2017 18:59:26
Official statement from lfc so yeh.

07 Jun 2017 19:05:50
Rumour is lfc dropped interest in vvd due to now knowing who Southampton would sign as a replacement and will buy him instead.

07 Jun 2017 19:10:02
The statement makes it pretty clear there was interest in Van Dijk and also that the club have acted inappropriately. Absolute farce. While I've no doubt that tapping up goes on all the time to get caught is pathetic and shameful. A chance to get a player who would have improved our squad blown. Whoever has been involved should hang their heads in shame and consider where they stand. And that includes the manager and I'm his biggest fan.

07 Jun 2017 19:13:15
Hahaha nice one lee.

07 Jun 2017 19:15:34
Wtf? Lfc shocker. Disgrace.

07 Jun 2017 19:06:20
How many more times are we going to mess up transfer dealings? Our club is becoming a laughing stock by not being able to abide by the rules. We have lost a quality player in VVD, exactly what we needed! Even more inexcusable as we beat off Chelsea and City for him due to the lad wanting to play for us.

07 Jun 2017 19:06:39
What a bunch of idiots if there really was a breach of regulations. Looks like they'll never learn.

07 Jun 2017 19:06:41
Ha ha, if that is the case then Liverpool are run like a circus.

I think it is fair to say that we are and never were in a position financially to make the VVD deal happen.

Yet fans seem to think spending that kind of money does not matter. It does because it will drown Liverpool financially even further.

Will be extremely disappointed if the tapping up news is true and we will deserve what comes our way from the EPL.

{Ed025's Note - thats very masochistic of you max, ok so they cocked up, they wont be the first or the last mate.. lets move on..

07 Jun 2017 19:07:18
Ffs. What a shambles. We'll go and waste a fortune on rubbish like Keane now. Typical of the shambolic way we conduct our business.

{Ed025's Note - its poor but not the end of the world FMS..

07 Jun 2017 19:21:31
Spot on Kimos.
This continual tapping up of players is making us a complete laughing stock and heads should role. If we are unable to make the marquee signings Klopp wants our transfer window becomes diluted and worst still we end up paying even more for players down our pecking list and diluting our squads quality.
Klopp surely will only be speaking to players on advice from others. If he has done it on his own back then we have to seriously consider those consequences and like you I love te guy! let's wait to see how this plays out.

07 Jun 2017 19:24:37
Got to laugh haven't you.

Get everyone's frustration but there's probably a 100 ways to cross wires and it's probably a misunderstanding somewhere along the lines.

Reset move on and try to repair some reputation by 1. Dealing correctly 2.wrap up deal quietly 3. Hire Southampton scout lol.

07 Jun 2017 19:35:14
There's no need or excuse for it. Someone or some people have seriously f**ked up. It's an embarrassment and you can see other clubs rubbing their hands. Why do it? See how it pans out like you say patemondo but what looked like a promising start to the summer looks like turning into a desperate race to spunk money.

07 Jun 2017 19:24:55
Ed025, we would have never even be willing to pay up even if Soton were willing to listen. We did not even approach them.

We went behind their backs to get the player on our side and then screw Southampton over.

Disgrace.

{Ed025's Note - your guessing there max, it was done to jump the queue and yes it was naive but lets have a bit of perspective..

07 Jun 2017 19:58:06
This isn't simply a case of 'crossed wires' this is somewhere between malpractice and utter incompetence. Don't know about the rest of you but I'm furious at the way we've conducted this, shambles and and we're a joke of a club at the moment. This is right up there with the Suarez nonsense. Btw collective apologies to the Eds too as you will probably be dealing with a lot of really annoyed fans.

07 Jun 2017 20:39:35
For me personally i am gutted if we did do something a bit shady, if we knew we were, rather than a genuine misunderstanding. but i am glad to be honest we are not going to spend that money on a player i don't think is good enough to match the price, even in today's crazy football market costs.

07 Jun 2017 21:13:47
So is this another case of tapping up or genuine crossed wires and club thought by speaking to agent that Southampton were aware. If this is tapping up then anyone involved in this and previous incidents has to go, including Klopp otherwise the club will be incapable if ever signing anyone in future.

07 Jun 2017 21:39:18
Embarrassing. Just do the job properly!

07 Jun 2017 13:28:35
Its a real shame to miss out on VVD, but the club's reputation must be damaged by these sorts of blunders.
I can't help wondering whether potential future signings that we approach will tend to doubt the club's credibility in the transfer market.
That said, with a rumoured price tag of over 70m, I wonder which clubs will make offers?

07 Jun 2017 18:45:53
OFFICIAL STATEMENT from club has confirmed interest in Virgil Van dijk will cease.

07 Jun 2017 18:56:47
Heads need to roll over this that's what you get when you put someone in charge of transfers with zero experience.

07 Jun 2017 18:59:46
Gutted.

07 Jun 2017 19:00:09
It's shocking players willing and wanting the club and they abandon them regardless of tapping up or not! Sure spend the money on 7/ 8 mediocre players!

07 Jun 2017 19:02:38
Harry McGuire then hahaha.

07 Jun 2017 19:03:16
I guess that confirms that LFC were tapping up the player.

07 Jun 2017 19:03:27
Absolutely gutted we are useless in the transfer market now we will end up with no Salah and no vvd every window we mess up.

07 Jun 2017 19:10:17
You know, I thought the transfer windows where we bought in Diao, Diouff and Cheyrou or the Joe Cole transfer window was bad, but crikey, this is must be close to the worst.

07 Jun 2017 19:11:53
What a joke.

07 Jun 2017 19:12:14
Absolutely shocking the way we are going about things😢I'm still hoping something can be done with Southampton regarding van the man and this is our way of softening them up so in the next couple of weeks we can start to talk again through the proper channels 🤞.

07 Jun 2017 19:26:21
hmasson2 The club cannot come out with an official grovelling letter and then go back and ask "by the way, remember that lad. " this is embarrassing enough without making us look right gobshhhh.

07 Jun 2017 19:41:30
Imo, even if we ended up buying VVD
@60+m, it would have put him under increased pressure to perform immediately.

Gutted but I believe our defence will be sorted out by Kloppo in this window.

Walk on. with hope in your heart.

07 Jun 2017 20:00:40
We'll start next season with the same shambolic defence and with the same problems as last season and a transfer ban as well whilst those around us buy world class players, forget winning any trophies for the next few years, our management structure has ballsed that up royally.

07 Jun 2017 19:44:10
We are indeed run by amateurs. Everyone knows how transfers work and the processes involved YET we act like we are either beginners or out of complete arrogance and disregard for the rules in place. VVD or not, this needs to end and punishment needs to be handed out to those concerned even if it is indeed Klopp.

07 Jun 2017 20:07:43
gutted, . unluckeee.

07 Jun 2017 20:17:05
Obviously this is not good at all but people saying the whole window is a disgrace seems too much.
We don't know how things will turn out yet and some people seem over dramatic.
Let's wait and see.

07 Jun 2017 17:19:32
hello mr. ED i am new to this page and i would like to know what is going with the salah deal is it really a smokescreen or is the deal off? and are we going to get VVD . I would really appreciate your reply.

{Ed002's Note - Liverpool would like to buy Salah Oz but they have not offered enough money to persuade Roma to sell him.}

07 Jun 2017 17:34:17
Wow really Ed002. Embarrassing specially since these people doing the deals will be on 100k a year plus.

We really are a joke of a club when it comes to business side of things.

07 Jun 2017 17:37:29
and what about VVD Mr. Ed.

{Ed002's Note - Clearly Liverpool want to buy him and I am sure Southampton would be happy to give Liverpool a deal for perhaps £70M if the player has been tapped up.}

07 Jun 2017 18:00:31
And if he hasn't been tapped up ed?

{Ed002's Note - Then there will not be any charges.}

07 Jun 2017 18:02:25
jordz - why do you make that statement? We would be a joke if we regularly offered well above market value! Or have you forgotten Leeds Utd?

07 Jun 2017 19:11:47
AndyM think i submitted comment to wrong place. was supposed to be to ed002 comment about roma now investigating us regards salah deal.

That's why the club is a joke. Two transfers out of two investigated for tapping up. One the VVD deal we have practically just admitted to by pulling our interest. There should no excuses. There actions have let the fans down.

07 Jun 2017 17:08:24
There is rumours circulating that Liverpool have had a €20m bid for Stefan de Vrij rejected by Lazio, this would be a cheap alternative to Virgil Van Dijk, Lazio apparently want €30m!

07 Jun 2017 17:32:50
Quality CB imo. Better value for money than VVD at half the price. Lazio want 20 million plus for him but he would be worth it coz he also possesses leadership qualities.

07 Jun 2017 18:11:50
I asked ed01 who he would prefer to vvd after he had said why he didn't think vvd was right for us- de vrij was the player named as a realuatic alternative.

07 Jun 2017 18:11:59
Not aware of any link (I thought he was Milan-bound? ), but he is a good player who's improved considerably and probably does represent better value if Southampton is now demanding £70m.

07 Jun 2017 18:13:54
Maybe we are looking to buy both and play 6 at the back next year 😂.

07 Jun 2017 10:47:59
Anything eds in the gelson martins rumours on sky right now?

{Ed002's Note - I am not aware of Liverpool interest but other sides have decided the asking price is too high.}

07 Jun 2017 15:45:59
I've read that klopp met with van dijk in Blackpool to personally convince him his future is at anfield . (mirror)

Surely if this is true we will be facing some sort of transfer ban and fine . I fail to see how the club could be so stupid myself and not learn from past events .

Any idea if any the above is true?

07 Jun 2017 15:59:12
It's true they were spotted on the big dipper together and also shared some Blackpool rock.

07 Jun 2017 16:00:20
hope not.

07 Jun 2017 16:11:00
Considering this come from John Cross and the mirror, i really don't believe it. Plus I've seen photos the past couple days on Klopp on holiday in iceland.

07 Jun 2017 16:15:47
"Mirror" says it all mate 😂.

07 Jun 2017 16:18:02
Yeh and they both stopped in my hotel and had a full English brekky 😂😂.

07 Jun 2017 16:18:50
I guess the club would use the Mourinho/ Cole thing as a yardstick.

07 Jun 2017 13:26:35
Eds. any news on the salah deal or is it a no go now shame good player. Reddave.

{Ed001's Note - it doesn't change by the second mate, people need to calm down negotiations can take time.}

07 Jun 2017 14:10:49
Is the Gelson Martins rumours just fabrication mate?

{Ed001's Note - no idea sorry.}

07 Jun 2017 14:29:59
How about now, Ed? :p.

07 Jun 2017 14:58:57
I understand exactly what you're saying Ed but it's too exciting/ nerve racking for us fans. Patience has never been my strong suit so I can understand where the op is coming from too. Although to be fair the window doesn't open for another 3.5 weeks. We'll all be having breakdowns at this rate :-)

07 Jun 2017 15:16:49
This is going to be a long summer😏.

07 Jun 2017 15:29:49
My season ticket renewal is reliant on salah (sarcasm)

07 Jun 2017 15:34:06
It's always a long summer for LFC fans because we tend to believe every rumour we hear or read about from the media.

07 Jun 2017 15:37:31
i hate waiting and all of the rumours make it even worst.

07 Jun 2017 09:59:07
Reports suggesting we are in with a bid of 52m for James.

07 Jun 2017 10:26:11
I don't belive it. But if so it would mean a farewell to Coutinho I assume. ATM I'd rather keep Phil and see him drive from that new 8 role.

07 Jun 2017 10:27:14
haha, good one. No mate. False.

07 Jun 2017 10:42:39
Good few papers going with it so its probably as reliable as a glass hammer, would be a good signing tho and keep coutihno too.

07 Jun 2017 10:57:49
He's too slow, often poor work ethic with occasional motd moment.

07 Jun 2017 13:39:32
James was only average when he played in goal for us. He'd be even worse now, he must be 50 at least!

07 Jun 2017 13:55:37
I would still trust Migs over James ;)

07 Jun 2017 14:01:26
James is a poor player. Doesn't track back, work hard off the ball, doesn't press and has a poor attitude, everything Klopp (and ZZ) despises in a player. No Thanks!

07 Jun 2017 15:50:17
He might have kopped on a bit and got his head in tune with his body.

He was one of the biggest disappointments I can remember.

He was absolute class at Watford. But his bottle must have went after signing for us.

Chris Kirkland was another example.

07 Jun 2017 16:44:30
Don't forget Scott Carson also, Dermot, although the Wally with the Brolly may have had more to do with his crisis of confidence!

Kirkland was more unlucky with injuries, to be fair. When he played, I remember him playing well.

07 Jun 2017 07:43:57
Trusted information for a very reliable source.
Jamie Carragher advised a board member to offload Sturridge which cause a rift between him and Carra recently. Danny doesn't want to leave and carra believes he should move out for regular football. Bilic is a long time admirer and would love to add him of they could offload Caroll.

Salah - It is understood the club has not agreed on a price yet with club sporting director Monchi currently away to US. The club has a €30 mill deficit which needs to be balanced before June 30. Roma has already a replacedment lined up in Dominick Berrardi ( Winger at sassuolo )

Central Midifielder - Klopp is understood to add a new CM this window with Kieta his number one priority. Ye club recently spoke to his representatives and the signs has not been negative. Klopp is ready to splash up to €40 mill to land the player.
Alternatives has been looked into the likes Paredes, William Carvalho.

Full back : The club are actively looking to add atleast one new full back. Robertson tops the list atm.

Thanks.

07 Jun 2017 08:04:34
Haven't the Eds, Macca, The posters, The media and my neighbours dog already given us this info?

Nothing here is a surprise at all.

07 Jun 2017 08:36:02
RTP

Lol.

07 Jun 2017 09:34:55
Carragher said that on TV not to a board member, and sturridge pulled him up on it on the trip to Australia, which is good imo, gets to say what he wants with no challenge,

07 Jun 2017 09:51:20
A much needed kick up the arse. Carragher the motivator!

07 Jun 2017 10:02:13
Thanks for just repeating what you have read on here Harry. It does make you look like you know what your talking about though.

07 Jun 2017 10:47:08
Or maybe Carragher just needs to butt out and let Klopp do his job!

07 Jun 2017 11:35:47
Fair play to Sturridge, he wants to stay and fight for his place.

07 Jun 2017 11:36:21
Robertson? are you having a laugh! would be the worse full back since Konchesky!

07 Jun 2017 13:13:44
In other news the sky is blue and the sun is yellow.

Yes, I am ITK ;)

07 Jun 2017 14:04:34
Harry, the Ed's have already given us the updates you mentioned however, the Robertson link you posted is incorrect. He is not the top target for LB as that is Benjamin Mendy from Monaco who Monaco will not let leave if the 40m price is not met. Robertson is just one of the other LB's being considered. Fixed it for ya. You're welcome.

07 Jun 2017 15:46:51
His "reliable source" is this site by the looks of it since that's all here. nice little overview though. cheers!