03 Aug 2014 21:06:53
In response to a comment someone made earlier, I cannot believe people on this site do not understand this yet.

Money, however it is spent, is money lost, whether it is on transfer fee or wages.

Lallana may have cost a few million more than kroos, but i'll take a guess at saying his wages are at least half of toni kroos' at real madrid. Ultimately, that means he will cost a lot more than lallana. Lallana is cheaper. Pretty simple.

We have not been humiliated by that comparison of those two transfers. Anybody who thinks that is too stupid to realise that we havent. Use your heads!