16 Jan 2019 17:56:30
Telegraph are reporting that Tottenham are interested in Origi, any truth in this?


1.) 16 Jan 2019
16 Jan 2019 18:40:18
I'd find it as unlikely/ foolish. Origi is not better than Llorente. Surely if they were going to go for a loan to cover for Kane's injury, Batshuayi would be a better option?

I know he's not a top calibre forward, but I think he's better than Origi.


2.) 16 Jan 2019
16 Jan 2019 19:31:35
By no means am I saying this is true, just posting what I read, I think Llorente is as good as gone and Batshuay is off to Monaco.


3.) 16 Jan 2019
16 Jan 2019 19:37:09
I despair of posters who give such nonsense even a second’s thought. In what parallel universe would we help out a major competitor by selling/ loaning them one of our players?


4.) 16 Jan 2019
16 Jan 2019 20:39:41
Jonesred - They may reconsider that Llorente transfer out now. It would leave Jannsen as their only striker (and he's a big poo pie), unless they have someone in the academy, but that is a lot of responsibility for a young player, replacing Kane until mid March.

Lucas Moura is injured, Son is on international duty. I can't think who they can play up front if they let Llorente go.

{Ed001's Note - the Asian Nations final is on the 1st Feb, if I remember correctly, so it is only a couple of weeks then Son is back.}


5.) 16 Jan 2019
16 Jan 2019 22:08:15
Who said it would be classed as helping them lol.


6.) 17 Jan 2019
17 Jan 2019 07:53:31
Vary true Ravi, and I don’t see them catching us.


7.) 17 Jan 2019
17 Jan 2019 12:04:55
I would keep Origi personally. For all his negatives and poor form when playing for loan teams away from us, when he's been in a red shirt, he's put the ball in the net on basis decent enough to be at rotation or cover.