Liverpool Rumours Member Posts


Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

(single word yields best result)

TheKloppEnd's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



TheKloppEnd's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To TheKloppEnd's Posts



To TheKloppEnd's last 5 rumours posts


To TheKloppEnd's last 5 rumour replies


TheKloppEnd's rumours posts with other poster's replies to TheKloppEnd's rumours posts


02 Mar 2018 12:16:48
Seen this morning the papers have jumped on the possibility of Marco Reus joining in the summer. I must be sceptical but I feel as this is just rumours created from the fact Reus celebrated in the week like Mane and Firmino. Eds I'd love you to tell me I'm wrong, any interest?


{Ed001's Note - I can't tell you anything about what the papers have said as I don't read them, but I trust you are correct that they have said it.}

1.) 02 Mar 2018 14:36:00
reus has become the new gotze! very talented player but like gotze he has suffered from a lot of injuries.

2.) 02 Mar 2018 15:40:59
Not sure Reus would be a priority to LFC.

Goalkeeper 1st
CM 2nd
CD 3rd

Anything else comes after them positions.

3.) 03 Mar 2018 07:00:40
Whether the rumours are true about reus it got me thinking that 4 years ago we would have taken reus in a shot. Now he wouldn't get in the side, that shows progress.

4.) 03 Mar 2018 09:58:06
There are a number of factors as to why I don't think we would make a move for him:

1) His injury issues are awful, he has struggled badly for fitness and it has affected him as a player.

2) The position he plays in is absolutely not a priority.

3) His price is still likely to be prohibitive despite his injury woes and we could simply find better ways of spending that money.

4) Klopp said he would not go back and raid his former club - so far he has not broken that 'promise', it seems unlikely he will do so in future.

It's likely a recycled story rather than anything new, the newspapers have got to print something so on quiet days the old links come out again. I'd be genuinely shocked if we did sign him and, to be honest, I hope we don't - a massively injury prone attacker whose transfer fee, wages, etc would be astronomical and who is a shadow of the player he was years ago.

5.) 03 Mar 2018 22:29:32
TheKloppEnd, I knew a bloke once that danced like my ex missus! Does this mean Im going to end up sleeping with him?

6.) 04 Mar 2018 19:12:29
All this silly talk about signing Reus really does get my Götze.



27 Dec 2017 09:54:18
Reports this morning Eds that we have made a bid for De Vrij after deciding that VVD is too expensive. Any insight or confirmation?


{Ed002's Note - De Vrij is out of contract in the summer and Liverpool can speak to him about signing a pre-contract from next week. I am not aware of any "bid" at this time. Everyone told me that van Dijk has already agreed the move to Liverpool a week or so ago after Liverpool and Southampton agreed terms - didn't it say so on Twitter? And isn't he arriving on the same boat as the many, many other players who are joining next week? Goretzka, Kovacic etc.? I really don't know what to say about van Dijk. I have explained that there would be the need for the Liverpool owners to withdraw their grovelling apology issued to avoid charges from the Premier League in the summer and a loss of face for them. It would however prove to Klopp that his cheating works. You can try the search engine. I have explained Liverpool's interest in DEe Vrij for a long time - but have seemingly been wasting my time - there are other sides also interested in him.}

1.) 27 Dec 2017 12:06:20
Van Dijk is nailed on for City, so a big for De Vrij would make sense.

2.) 27 Dec 2017 12:24:50
How’s he nailed onto go city? There’s nothing to back this up there in the same boat as us.

3.) 27 Dec 2017 12:35:34
We didn't all tell you ed that VVD agreed to sign a week or so go Ed. A few people on here put it on for what ever reason. We are not all on Twitter were I presume the crap was started, I certainly am not so asked if you had heard anything and you said you would need to ask. I hope everyones posts asking about him don't make it on here as I can't be doing with it all again like last summer and im sure you don't want it.

De Vrij looks decent enough to me and I hope he arrives in Jan.

4.) 27 Dec 2017 13:25:25
He’s hardly covered himself in glory the first half of this season though has he . I was a huge fan of VVD but can’t say I’d be fussed if he went elsewhere now.

5.) 27 Dec 2017 13:36:47
i thought i read that de vrij signed a new contract not so long ago.

{Ed002's Note - Twitter perhaps?}

6.) 27 Dec 2017 15:31:10
The reason that VVD is nailed on for City?
(1) It’s very well known that City want a centre half.
(2) They are very very interested in VVD.
(3) Southampton have apparently decided to cash in on VVD, but are extremely reluctant to deal with us.
(4) City can pay the transfer in full up front which aside from any other issues makes them a far more attractive proposition to Southampton.

It’s obvious to most observers that VVD is highly unlikely to join us.

7.) 27 Dec 2017 15:45:08
So he’s nailed on bec you’ve made a load of reasons up😂.

8.) 27 Dec 2017 15:49:46
Think it will depend on where the player wants to go. Who he will find a more attractive offer for himself. He might of choose us in the summer but who knows how he feels after our summer debacle.

9.) 27 Dec 2017 16:29:10
So even after Eds explanation people still think its a case of the player choosing us!? Get over it people its not happening full stop and no way the club are withdrawing there apology.

10.) 27 Dec 2017 16:54:36
Ed’s haven’t said it can’t happen but that we would have to withdraw are apology and mend bridges with Southampton I’m not saying it’s going to happen but to say it’s a done deal either way is ludicrous.

11.) 27 Dec 2017 22:34:57
De Vrij would struggle in a team that plays a high line. While he has good anticipation, he is very very slow. I am surprised that Klopp would consider him as an alternative to VVD. They are very different players.




TheKloppEnd has no Banter Posts



TheKloppEnd's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

28 Dec 2017 10:48:08
If we were to sign Trapp after the VVD signing then there is a genuine chance that we can challenge for the Champions league this year. Our attack would frighten anyone in the competition and with a potential back line of Trapp Clyne Gomez/ Matip VVD and Robertson we could have a chance to keep most teams out at the other end. Albeit I do not know whether Trapp is cup tied.




Click To View This Thread

27 Dec 2017 10:04:11
I think it is naive of us to think of the current market as containing stupid prices. They haven't just being created out of nothing. The money in the game now means that it is unlikely that we will ever see the prices of yesteryear. Transfer fees for the likes of Figo, Zidane, Buffon and Crespo were all considered ridiculous but now that money gets you Raheem Sterling. Football is changing in England and we have to adapt to kick on from where we have got ourselves. 5 english teams in the Champions league knockout phase is ridiculous but its only the beginning. Don't be surprised if we see a period of english dominance in Europe for years to come. (Excluding the national side, they will be forever hopeless)




Click To View This Thread

20 Dec 2017 10:10:32
Why is there such negative response to this rumour?
Surely Luiz would be a better option than Lovren and Klavan.
I would understand the frustration if it were an alternative to VVD but if he were along side I can only see it as a positive upgrade to our defence.


{Ed002's Note - David Luiz won't be moving to Liverpool.}




TheKloppEnd has no Banter Replies