Liverpool Rumours Member Posts

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.


(single word yields best result)
 

Our weekly Correct Score Competition is now open for Week 2

Redrog's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing


No Profile Picture uploaded

Team: Liverpool


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




Redrog's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Redrog's Posts

 

 

To Redrog's last 5 banter posts

 

To Redrog's last 5 rumour replies

 

To Redrog's last 5 banter replies

 

Redrog has no Rumours Posts

 

 

Redrog's banter posts with other poster's replies to Redrog's banter posts

 

17 May 2016 17:34:23
Greetings fellow reds. As you probably already know BT are live streaming tomorrow's game for free on YouTube. com/ btsport. I have Sky sports but not subscribed to Btsports I always watched the games on iPad through the app Universal HDTV. Today I noticed on the Sky TV guide on BT sports program guide the match is advertised as FREEVIEW does anybody know if we can watch free through a Sky box?

Come on you Reds. YNWA.

Redrog

{Ed002's Note - The channels, enabled or not, should be there.}


1.) 17 May 2016 18:12:38
Redrog

I'm not very technically minded. But the footy is on Freeview Channel 59.
I've been told it's not available on the Sky platform. But if you've got Freeview built into your TV, you can tune into it via a normal TV aerial.
i. e. change the Input from HDMI to Antenna and manually tune in the Freeview channel .
Dont take my word for it though. just what I've been told.


2.) 17 May 2016 18:13:53
Or switch sky off and watch through DTV option.


3.) 17 May 2016 18:33:49
Thanks for the replies guys. I was just curious having seen it listed as Freeview on BTsports on the Sky platform as to whether it was being screened through Sky. I know in the past Sky have done free weekends and screened live games on Sky1. I will check my freeview is tuned in ready anyway.


 

 

13 Sep 2015 08:02:49
Morning fellow Reds & Eds,

I may be wrong and it matters not now anyway. But on Martial's goal yesterday was Fellaini not in an offside position under the new rules? He was ahead of the last defender running in towards Migs as the shot was made although not really interfering with play, that does not come into play now - was he offside?

There was so much made of Coutts on Bentekes goal against Bournmouth although he made a play for the ball it was said that didn't matter as he was in an offside position and any player interfering or not would be called offside.

I know we got the luck then but so much was made of it but when it's Martial's debut goal and its Man Utd not a word.

BTW - when we going to get a proper manager? Wasted money in transfer market, bad tactics, players playing out of position its rolling on from one season to the next in fact the performances are getting worse. - I can't see us above mid table this year with Rogers. When he came in he sold Andy Carroll saying he did not fit into his style of play - this year he spends £32m on Benteke a similar player to Carroll so how does he fit in when Carroll didn't.

Redrog

1.) 13 Sep 2015 08:21:41
I think you misunderstood. Benteke was not bought to fit in his style or change to a new style.

A big powerful physical monster up front who could hold the ball well and physically surrender the opposition CB, Who could also shoot from distance and has a good goal scoring records.

We were never going to change the style.


2.) 13 Sep 2015 09:53:32
Personally I thought Benteke was very poor yesterday and as a footballer I think he's always very poor
Strange that Rodgers absolutely didn't want a player like Carroll then goes and spends fortunes on one


3.) 13 Sep 2015 09:56:46
Then why,when his backroom staff were sacked, did Rogers say we are going in a different direction. We are going in a different direction alright, downwards


 

 

16 Feb 2014 15:45:50
I can see what is going to happen here, 25th anniversary of Hillsborough it is written in the stars we will draw Nottingham Forest in the Semi Final like 1989!

Redrog

 

 

05 Aug 2013 19:28:07
What if we were to test Arsenal and take the £40m + Wilshire, I think could be a decent deal as he could eventually be Stevies replacement like I recon he will in the England set up. Don't think Wenger would want to part with one of his Crown Jewels to a rival club so why should we sell the crying a**e to Arsenal or any EPL team for that matter - sell him abroad and good riddance! {Ed030's Note - Wilshere is a very good player and he would be valued around£30 million and he has injury problems,Arsenal will not offer a package in the region of £70 million pounds. }

Redrog

1.) Your words are probably true ed but as BR said Bale is not worth double Arsenals valuation of Suarez so on that basis why not? I know it's all hypothetical but if they want a deal why not try to get something out of it ourselves to settle the selling to a rival debate? {Ed030's Note - They are never going to offer it mate,Comparing Suarez's price to Bale's,It's just like saying Carroll cost £30m and Coutinho cost £8 then Carroll is the better player which is not the case,Sometimes you need to pay over the odds which Real Madrid are doing. }


2.) I would rather take Carzola, straight swap even {Ed030's Note - You would swap and aging Cazorla worth around £20 million for Suarez who is worth £50+,I know I wouldn't. }


3.) Then they can forget about Suarez then .maybe bid for Darren bent .no disrespect mr.bent.


4.) Hey ed not a dig m8 but 30 m for whilshere more like 50 m the way these crazy transfers prices are going joey Barton worth 25 m ha, really hope these big prices come down once FFP kicks in its getting bad
Ynwa {Ed030's Note - I doubt anyone would pay over £35 million for him due to his injury problems. }


 

 

30 Jun 2013 16:11:24
Hi Eds, what do you reckon of the chances we may go back in to resign Torres with the Suarez money? Would probably get him at good price with cash left for other options. Proved himself with us b4 could do it again linking up with Stevie and also now with Coutinho?
Also gutted Jonjo maybe going, had big hopes for him, thought he could have been developed to eventually step into Stevies boots. Big mistake to let him go IMO. Should let Joe Allan instead jury's out on him for me.

Redrog

1.) We could go for heskey and rush aswell


2.) 30 Jun 2013 16:52:33
Jonjo has had a long time, and is not advancing anywhere near what was expected. Either we let him go now, or end up with another jay spearing on our hands

Alvy


3.) I actually think he improved massivley this season, remember his performances in the europa league? Arriving from deep and scoring goals. I'm not saying he's a world beater, far from it and he may have tempremant issues which could be viewed as passion. I'm just saying what's the harm in keeping him another year or loaning him until January


4.) Jonjo is very similar in style and physique to charlie adam, do you still want to keep him?


5.) Lol, Kumber - Heskey couldn't hit a cows arse with a banjo when he was with us. I bet Rushy could still find the net more than him now!


 

 

 

Redrog's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

11 Jun 2017 07:51:00
We have enough issues with keeping our own squad fit and free from injury without paying £40m for a player who is prone to picking up injuries.

Redrog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

11 Jun 2017 07:46:35
Reports are now being reported LFC are again being investigated for "tapping up" Steve McNulty prior to deal being agreed with Tranmere.

Redrog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

All top players are spoilt brats these days, sad but true. Very few like Stevie and Carra play entire career for one club. They are all fake badge kissers in it for as much money they can get their greedy paws on. They have their strings pulled by their even greedier agents who turn their heads when they are promised a deal for more money!

Redrog

 

 

 

Redrog's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

21 Jul 2017 08:23:00
Well said Ron 👍.

Redrog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

17 May 2016 18:33:49
Thanks for the replies guys. I was just curious having seen it listed as Freeview on BTsports on the Sky platform as to whether it was being screened through Sky. I know in the past Sky have done free weekends and screened live games on Sky1. I will check my freeview is tuned in ready anyway.

Redrog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

It's all flappy two fisted stuff could go anywhere he never commits to catch the ball and take the pressure of the defence. But saying that all our keepers have their faults Pepe could never defend his near post.

Redrog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

I get it he needs to play - but Jones makes me nervous. He is like a vampire with crosses, our defence is always likely to concede it doesn't help with a keeper you can't trust. We could do with a better back up but who do you get to be happy sitting on the bench. Maybe if we keep Pepe in summer it will give Mignolet some proper completion for the no1 jersey.

Redrog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

Your words are probably true ed but as BR said Bale is not worth double Arsenals valuation of Suarez so on that basis why not? I know it's all hypothetical but if they want a deal why not try to get something out of it ourselves to settle the selling to a rival debate? {Ed030's Note - They are never going to offer it mate,Comparing Suarez's price to Bale's,It's just like saying Carroll cost £30m and Coutinho cost £8 then Carroll is the better player which is not the case,Sometimes you need to pay over the odds which Real Madrid are doing. }

Redrog