Liverpool Rumours Archive July 08 2018

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

08 Jul 2018 17:12:13
Any update on the probable exit of Danny Ings? I would have thought clubs might have registered interest by now with him not having any World Cup commitments etc. Also what is the current situation with Lallana do you think he is still part of first team plans! Seems to me we are squad heavy with players who won't really get a sniff during the new season. Others too like Origi, Sturridge, Moreno, Mignolet, Clyne, Markovic and grugic are just a few that spring to mind but I'm not hearing much about possible takers. I know we need squad depth but just can't see some even making the bench with any regularity especially if we have a couple more incomings which we assume is expected.

Believable2 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - Southampton has an interest in Ings. Liverpool have made no efforts to sell Lallana. Grujic will leave, probably on loan. Markovic has been priced out of a move to the two interested sides and his agent is trying to get Galatasaray interested.}

08 Jul 2018 17:59:00
Reply much appreciated ed! Just think we have such a big stock of players who won’t see game time at all considering the bench will be full of the likes of chamberlain winjnaldum Solanke Matip Gomez Karius etc. Add to that the youngsters looking for cameos then even getting in the match day Squad will be tough for the ones I’ve mentioned and probably I few others I haven’t mentioned. Shame really because I think they could really improve some of the mid table teams as well as improving their own positions! This is why I get miffed when fans are happy to be buying squad players such as Shaquiri etc. Half the problem I suspect will be Liverpool trying to get ridiculous money for the players mentioned. Great site by the way. Love my daily catch up on here!

Agree2 Disagree8

08 Jul 2018 18:44:38
I don't know how these things work but I would think the hardest player to get rid of would be Sturridge. Simply because of his history with injuries.

Agree8 Disagree0

08 Jul 2018 19:25:31
Sturridge is a massive risk for anyone. There's a slim chance that he could be a great signing, but it's very slim. He'll probably go abroad and I think Turkey is the most likely.

Agree4 Disagree3

08 Jul 2018 21:08:12
swap sturridge +10m for Vida.

Agree0 Disagree20

08 Jul 2018 21:32:04
Vida. funny.

Agree10 Disagree0

08 Jul 2018 21:41:35
For the love of god will someone just let markovich leave. We’ve damaged his career enough as it is. Cut a deal and let him get on with his life.

Agree7 Disagree2

{Ed025's Note - lash him in a bin somewhere...with the rest of the trash..

08 Jul 2018 22:08:38
Exactly aoe just let him go.

Agree3 Disagree2

08 Jul 2018 22:09:10
Still think he could be a useful player.

Surprised klopp just didn't give him. a chance.

Save us a pretty penny to have him as cover on the flanks.

Agree4 Disagree8

08 Jul 2018 22:23:58
Poor poor Lazar. how could we treat him this way?

Agree6 Disagree1

08 Jul 2018 23:50:41
Ed025, there is room in the bin for him now, seeing as though Pickford is doing ok and has been allowed out, and that means one less Blue in there.

Agree1 Disagree1

{Ed025's Note - hes doing more than ok burkey hes the star of the show up till now, if there is any room in that bin i would suggest karius deserves a spot mate, just be careful when you shut the lid though as if it catches his head it could concuss him..

09 Jul 2018 07:58:10
Ed25, top man, the rose tinted brigade will be having hissy fits when they read that about Karius, cheered me right up.

Agree1 Disagree3

09 Jul 2018 09:31:34
Genuinely cannot wait until Karius pulls off a wonder save against Everton, strolls up to their star player (who counts as their star player nowadays? ) and 'Zidanes' them back to a time when Everton mattered ;)

Agree15 Disagree1

09 Jul 2018 11:36:18
Was there such a time Hjikle?

Agree2 Disagree0

09 Jul 2018 12:13:46
I've heard fireside tales of long lost FA Cup wins long ago.

Agree2 Disagree0

09 Jul 2018 10:51:21
Loved that ED25. Gave me a giggle :)

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed025's Note - im well past being PC lamborini mate..

09 Jul 2018 21:06:51
I remember when they mattered. They had a beast of a striker called Daniel Amokachi. He never really reached his potential as they kept subbing him for Paul Rideout.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Jul 2018 10:18:05
Ed, if you're going to dump Karius in the bin, don't throw him the bin lid. he's going to fumble it.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Karius gets the point that he is loathed by enormous numbers of Liverpool fans - we are getting sick of reading about it here.}

08 Jul 2018 14:38:31
hi eds, any update on Buvac? Seems to have gone quiet, cheers.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - what is there to update? He has left.}

08 Jul 2018 16:03:59
Are you able to say why Ed? And is there no chance of reconciliation?

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - I dealt with this last season when he resigned. Move on.}

09 Jul 2018 13:40:14
Could somebody please point me to where it was dealt with? Can’t seem to find it on the search feature.

Agree1 Disagree1

10 Jul 2018 07:57:36
It was dealt in a cople of posts mate, just search fkr it as it is a long one.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jul 2018 09:29:09
Morning Ed1, hope you're well? Can I ask whether you think we'll go back in for Fekir or if you think we've moved on from him

I only ask because everything Aulas keeps saying suggests it's over.

Thanks in advance.

Believable4 Unbelievable2

{Ed001's Note - nothing has changed as far as I am aware.}

08 Jul 2018 10:15:00
He said the same thing about Lacazette last summer. The guy just loves to talk rubbish to anyone willing to listen.

Agree10 Disagree1

08 Jul 2018 10:19:41
Sorry to jump in edd001 so do you think we still might go back in for him?

Agree9 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - yes, it still seems the most likely outcome. The lad wants the move, Lyon are willing to sell and Klopp wants him to join.}

08 Jul 2018 11:18:40
But his knee injury ed. We should steer clear.

Never sign someone who has had a acl, ox and ings are a little bit of proof.

It. doesn't matter wether is called over cautious. But someone who wants to turn like he does and not use to the league and in a pressing team like ours, it's got a high chance of reoccurring

Be frustrating to have ox and him out at the same time when we could of avoided it.

Agree2 Disagree14

{Ed001's Note - when the only worry is the injury, I would say that makes him a good gamble worth taking, personally.}

08 Jul 2018 10:53:23
Aulas is doing right by his club and wanting the most for his club, you can’t argue with that. His methods are unorthodox but he gets what he wants which is a very good deal for Lyon. A tricky customer but if we want Fekir as much as Keita and VVD I trust the club to get it done.

P. s. he is also trying to drum up interest for a better deal, we all do the same if we are selling something so why should it be different for a player.

Agree8 Disagree1

08 Jul 2018 10:53:23
Aulas is doing right by his club and wanting the most for his club, you can’t argue with that. His methods are unorthodox but he gets what he wants which is a very good deal for Lyon. A tricky customer but if we want Fekir as much as Keita and VVD I trust the club to get it done.

P. s. he is also trying to drum up interest for a better deal, we all do the same if we are selling something so why should it be different for a player.

Agree4 Disagree0

08 Jul 2018 11:20:12
To be honest, I think Aulas comments are him trying to test us again for another bid, he knows what he’s doing, can play hard ball all he wants but it’s clear he wants to sell Fekir, absolutely obvious he does, just wants to make himself look good beforehand, getting tired of the Fekir saga though I must say.

Agree4 Disagree0

08 Jul 2018 13:22:30
Not when it's the knees. There season and career enders.

You would put 60 mil on him not suffering another acl in the next 5 season's with us?

Ings came 2 months into career, oxs 10 months.

It's to big of an injury to shake off as a gamble. It hits and he's gone for a season minimum. They usually follow with ankle and muscle problems after. We didn't see ings for 2 season's. The ox were not being for at least 12 months. Once he is back unfortunately he will suffer another Injury, probably muscle related.

Muscle problems you can always hope there down to the poor fitness programme and such but knees, ankles and back are impossible to overcomes even through excessive pain medication etc.

Agree1 Disagree8

08 Jul 2018 14:33:40
Kloppsboss - have you seen the medical results and has chance to analyse them? Assuming the answer is no you're just making assumptions. Knee injuries Can be career enders but you have no idea what's happening with this knee.

Agree14 Disagree0

08 Jul 2018 15:51:42
Wasn’t it us messing Lyon about with payment structures rather than the medical that stalled the talks?

Agree7 Disagree1

08 Jul 2018 16:04:51
It's nothing to do with the medical my obnoxious friend.

He has already suffered an acl. I'm saying once a player has had an acl you should steer well clear.

Recently we have been bitten twice by that in ings and ox. Both suffered acl, we sign them, put them in klopps press and they both got hit again, Danny boy got hit twice.

It's just not a 60million pound gamble worth making.

Agree0 Disagree14

{Ed002's Note - Why did Liverpool waste all of that time then? You are making the club sound more stupid than the fans.}

08 Jul 2018 16:21:49
I trust ed001 on this. None of us know what happened for real, if it is the knee, there will not be detailed info on Fekirs knee available for us. ACL injury could be careerending, but 98 % of athletes at a top level comes back to their former level. Reinjury is an area where there is produced little research about, but on studio shows a reinjury rate at 5,6 % (just 176 top athletes in the study) . There are big differences in secondary injuries (in ACL injuries), from non to meniscusinjuries, cartilage injuries, tendoninjuries and on and on. The medical staffs are getting better and better in handling these injuries, so if the real problem is Fekirs knee there is either a more complexinjury (most likelydende cartilageinjury), or there is a tactical matter to get the price down (or a different payment structure), or there is a whole different matter that we don't know anything about.

Agree8 Disagree0

08 Jul 2018 16:30:41
We have another mystic meg it seems!

Agree8 Disagree1

{Ed002's Note - It was about the money. That was explained at the time. If a club wishes to buy a player, they make an acceptable offer and everyone is happy.}

08 Jul 2018 16:52:38
Exactly Ed, some people just look into it more then what it actually is.

Agree6 Disagree1

08 Jul 2018 17:14:50
Omg. What are you all on today.

Mr 002 I meant my comment wasn't about the medical not the club's decision why they pulled the transfer

As for the stats behind it, all I know is the medical staff did wonders for the ox and they could do nothing to prevent the acl from returning, nor could they when Danny's hit against Tottenham for the second time with us. Both came in self inflicted non worrying situations

As for your stats is that all of athletes from any sport because if it includes golf then it's going to sqiff he results a bit or are they including gks etc? Or is it just prem based because Torres had 2, ings had 2, ox has had 2.

This is the prem. It's klopps high pressing system. It's intense and fekir is someone who like to turn sharply.

I just wouldn't want to stick 60 mil on it not going again. Would rather make a little safer investment. What's the point in having fekir but he's out injured?

Agree0 Disagree8

{Ed002's Note - You really should not post on matters such as this as you are justting caught up in a web of dribble.}

08 Jul 2018 17:30:42
Fair enough ed. Will steer clear in the future.

Fekir has never suffered an acl and unlike ox and Danny ings who both suffered secondary ones, he will not.

We should invest 60 million because there is absolutely no chance of another knee injury.

Apologies for getting involved with my silly comments!

Agree1 Disagree15

08 Jul 2018 17:32:30
Also ed I am well aware the club are trying to get the price lower by complaining about the medical. I completely understand that.

I'm talking from a fact point of view. He has had a acl. There's more chance of it returning that not. Is it worth a 60 million pound investment to find out?

Agree0 Disagree7

{Ed002's Note - Well obviously Liverpool thought it was - otherwise why waste their tiem and effort on the player?}

08 Jul 2018 18:03:04
I know the club thought it was, I'm just saying in my opinion I don't think it is a risk worth taking, that is all. As ings and the ox proved.

Thanks for the dialogue though dude/ dudet :)

Agree3 Disagree7

08 Jul 2018 19:49:24
Hi ed01 I was just wondering whether or not you see Fekir as a guaranteed. Obviously, that's down to Klopp but I think the majority see him walking straight into the startin XI. I for one, don't see it this way I think Jordan Henderson is going to rise to the occassion and take up a place in the midfield 3 with Keita and Fabinho. Fabinho will definitely play as the deepest lying midfielder and Keita will be our box to box player. Ok I definitely see Fekir as a better attacking option and more of a goal threat than Henderson but Jordan will make our midfield harder to penetrate and he'll be able to slot in easier if Fab or Keita get caught out of position. That midfield would screen our back four quite adequately in my opinion and still leave us with an abundance of attacking options. Plus Jordan will pass the ball earlier which should help improve our fluidity. Sometimes these gifted dribblers like Fekir can tend to hold on tobthe ball a tad too long for my liking. However I would be made up if we do get Fekir and he breaks into the starting XI. Imagine the competition for spots with Ox still to come.

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - nothing is guaranteed.}

08 Jul 2018 20:04:25
Thanks ed 01 Not the response I was looking for but never the less quick and honest.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jul 2018 18:55:32
Any player can rupture anything at anytime. Why waste time and money on anyone if you think like that? The club, the people who have looked in to such things and have thought long and hard about whether it is a risk, or not, have decided that he is worth it. That should be enough. It's not your cash, try not to worry about how much is spent, and on whom.

Agree1 Disagree3

08 Jul 2018 21:02:10
Kloppsboss - his ACL has only gone once, a year later he had a slight issue with his knee but he was only out for 3 weeks so not a serious one. Although his next knee injury came 5 months later and he was out for 1 month.

So far he hasn't reinjured his ACL keeping him out for too long, and he is still able to play the way he does.
If he only misses 1 month a season then it’s a lot better than if he kept rupturing his ligament and being out for half a season or more.

He was probably more likely to get injured during the world cup if it was as bad as you think.
He didn’t get many minutes and had to go full tempo straight away to keep up with the rest of the team when he did get on the pitch instead of warming into the game directly after a long warmup phase, that could have resulted in him stressing his knee with his movements but it hasn't :)
Wasnt finisged but lost my train of thought here so ima press send xD.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jul 2018 21:02:50
ACLs were a huge issue years ago not anymore. Within the last 15 years there are numerous examples of players coming back from ACL injuries and excelling. van Nistelrooy, Keane, Shearer, there is loads more recent ones but too many beers this pm!

Had both knees done myself and came back stronger on both occasions albeit just at Irish League level. Fekir will sign Lyon are just being their usual hardselves to deal with.

Agree2 Disagree1

08 Jul 2018 22:15:47
Alex oclade Chamberlain has just redone his after similar time boys. Like a few months ago. He's out till next year. Medical science has come on?

Danny ings did his twice, one whilst having a full rehabilitation programme under us.

Both did them in not obvious situations.

All I'm saying is its like would you rather buy a puppy or a dog that bit it's last owner on the arse. Sure it might never happen again but is it worth the risk?

They do have a high percentage of reoccurring in the prem, we have seen that over the past few years with our boys. Just imagine whacking 60 mil on the kid then fellaini or someone crashes his knee and that's it done. He's gone for the entire season.

Acl can happen to any player but your hedging your bets by buying someone who has never had one.

Pulisic for example. As good, huge love from klopp me

Or brandt. I just don't feel fekir is at that level where your like his quality just negates every bit of risk. Like a mbpape would or something. He's a good player but in the bracket of a lot of similar players.

I'm not wishing anything on him just more from a different perspective really couldn't stand going for him over a brandt or pulisic and then he is out for the season.

Agree3 Disagree3

08 Jul 2018 23:36:03
nobody on this site has seen Fekir's medicals. The truth is we don't know had bad his knee is, and how likely a problem is to happen. That's why you pay professionals you trust to give you their opinion. Our recruitment was very poor before klopp arrived. If his knee checks out and he is a player we like, then we should try to find an agreement with Lyon. Simple as that.

Agree1 Disagree1

09 Jul 2018 00:21:18
I actually agree with your opinion of recurrence Kloppsboss and there seems to be some facts to back it up which I have pasted below. What I think is that we have no idea what went on in medical but I am certain they are aware of the past injury, we do not know what the club plans are for the player, we are not football managers with detailed knowledge and experience at the highest level. We need to trust the club to make expensive decisions and simply welcome and support him if he arrives. If the lad gets injured again then so be it. but if he scores the winner in the next CL final. pay the price!

Paste:: Applies to US Football


Copied from US National Library of Medicine

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a severe event for a footballer, but it is unclear if the knee injury rate is higher on returning to football after ACL injury.

Objective

To study the risk of knee injury in elite footballers with a history of ACL injury compared with those without.

Method

The Swedish male professional league (310 players) was studied during 2001. Players with a history of ACL injury at the study start were identified. Exposure to football and all time loss injuries during the season were recorded prospectively.

Results

Twenty four players (8%) had a history of 28 ACL injuries in 27 knees (one rerupture) . These players had a higher incidence of new knee injury of any type than the players without ACL injury (mean (SD) 4.2 (3.7) v 1.0 (0.7) injuries per 1000 hours, p  =  0.02). The risk of suffering a knee overuse injury was significantly higher regardless of whether the player (relative risk 4.8, 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 11.2) or the knee (relative risk 7.9, 95% confidence interval 3.4 to 18.5) was used as the unit of analysis. No interactive effects of age or any other anthropometric data were seen.


Conclusion

The risk of new knee injury, especially overuse injury, was significantly increased on return to elite football after ACL injury regardless of whether the player or the knee was used as the unit of analysis.

Agree3 Disagree1

09 Jul 2018 07:59:18
Kloppboss and RedalLover. I wrote you a reply, but manged to post it on the trend believe this one.

Agree0 Disagree1

09 Jul 2018 18:23:17
Like you say, this study is from 2001 and the sample size isn't really big enough to provide an accurate conclusion.
Rehabilitation techniques have significantly improved in 17 years so I would suggest this data is not appropriate to today's game.

Agree0 Disagree1

09 Jul 2018 19:46:39
Bit late to this party but didn’t van nistlerooy’s original transfer to United get put on hold due to him rupturing his ACL? It pains me to say it still but he came back from that to have a long and successful career. injuries happen all the time, but it doesn’t mean a player can’t reach potential, look how good Fekir’s season was last year, he was incredible.

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Jul 2018 09:19:30
Morning all

Surly these Jack Grealish rumours are tripe no doubting the kid has talent but he has a stinking attitude and a very short fuse to go with it, wouldn't want him anywhere near our club just a disruptive wanna be.

Believable14 Unbelievable1

{Ed025's Note - im with you mate..

08 Jul 2018 09:34:57
Cheers ed25
I know this is the Liverpool site but how do you see the coming season developing for all you blue noses. What's your take on your new manager and potential ins and outs.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed025's Note - im happy with silva and brands at the helm zippy, it will take time but i think we may be on the right track now and i dont expect there there will be many players coming in mate..

08 Jul 2018 12:06:20
Cheers mate looking forward to a few good auld derby battles this season best of luck to u and all the blue noses enjoy what's left of the weekend bud 😁.

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Jul 2018 10:00:13
At least you got shot of Fat Scam Ed.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed025's Note - yeah mate that was a good decision..

08 Jul 2018 10:03:41
Ed25 didn't you all say that last season? And the season before. and the one before. Only playin mate😁.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed025's Note - i have to ben, if you dont have hope mate you have nothing, then again mostly its been nothing..

08 Jul 2018 21:39:10
Imagine if fat Sam was still the England manager. God we all dodged a bullet there.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2018 07:18:08
Sorry for the late reply Kloppboss. The study was of top athletes in football, rugby and aussie rules rugby, so no golfers Involved. Ox reruptured his ligament in one of three classical situation where he tried to regain possesion of the ball, the other two are after heading (the landing situation), and the last one is cut and turn moves. Those three situations are almost the only situations where fotballens at a top level gets an ACL injury. The risk of rerupture is significantly higher the first match after the first injury, there is also a higher risk of reinjury if you come back to playing matches before 9 months after the first injury, and the risk gets less and less until 12 months after the first injury, after that there is now significant difference if you wait even longer.
If you look at all athletes in all levels of sport the return to sport at the same level they were before the injury, the number is s low as 54 % (recent review from Clare Ardern and her study Group) .

Redallover: the study you are referring to is from Jan Ekstrands group (he runs the UEFA medical study group where all the participant club in Champions league are invited to join, a study that are ongoing and has been so for the last 16 years), and much has happened since 2001. There were a lot higher reinjury rate at that time, and most injuries has a lot lower injury rate. There are still high Numbers of injury rate when it comes to muscle injuries, especially hamstring injuries, but the last data seems to finally to show improvement there as well (not published yet, but presented at the isokinetic medical conference at camp nou, juni 2.-4, 2018).

Make no mistake, an ACL injury is a serious injury, and will probably lead to early OA (oestoarthritis) in early are, and many that are not at a top level will never come back to sports. But there have been major advances in preventing, and handling ACL injuries at all levels. The 11+ programme has shows to be preventing at youth level and lower levels, at high levels it is a little bit more advanced. And as said earlier on ACL injuries usually comes with various secondary injuries that could cause some problems.

The biggest risk of any injury is previous injuries (so a player that has been injured, has a greater risk of a new injury of any sort), and exposure (time spent in training and match, where playing a match is more than double risk than training in acute injuries and muscle inuries that are more of an overloadinjury, other overloadinjuries seems to occur more in training) .

Agree0 Disagree1

 
Change Consent