Liverpool Rumours Archive June 06 2017

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

06 Jun 2017 22:41:11
Ssn reporting real madrid considering loaning theo hernandez out when he arrives. Do we still have any interest in him?

Believable0 Unbelievable1

{Ed025's Note - not that i am aware of mate..

06 Jun 2017 23:05:36
Ok, thanks for the swift reply pal. Is there any update on the LB situation? Is sessegnon a definate no go?

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed025's Note - at this time mate yes..

06 Jun 2017 22:22:12
According to Keveh Solhekol (Sky Sports) on Twitter:

On Van Dijk dispute - the Premier League are discussing Southampton's concerns with Liverpool. There is no investigation at the moment.

Believable6 Unbelievable4

06 Jun 2017 20:48:59
Liverpool Football Club have reached an agreement with Roma over the transfer of Mohamed Salah. Transfer fee of £33.6M has been agreed.

Believable20 Unbelievable8

06 Jun 2017 21:17:39
OH RLY?

Agree4 Disagree3

06 Jun 2017 21:19:07
I would ove it to be true but ain't seen owt of it yet.

Agree1 Disagree1

06 Jun 2017 21:20:12
Are you sure? When are you expecting an announcement? Why so specific a figure?

Agree1 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 21:20:57
I'm unconvinced by Salah, but Klopp knows a little better and I trust his judgement. If he ends up with LFC shirt hope he makes good for the team.

Agree6 Disagree2

06 Jun 2017 21:21:28
When Salah is posing in the red shirt then that will be when we can all.

Jump around! (3X)
Jump up, jump up and get down!
Jump! (17X)

What a tune!

Agree6 Disagree8

06 Jun 2017 21:27:19
Source? Douglas Costa as alternative? ?

Agree2 Disagree10

06 Jun 2017 21:42:20
Big D. where is your evidence of this?

Agree2 Disagree2

06 Jun 2017 21:54:03
The only remaining aspect of the deal is payment structure which is currently being finalized. Mohammed Salah to Liverpool is imminent.

Agree9 Disagree2

06 Jun 2017 22:00:23
Evidence? Source?

Agree3 Disagree1

06 Jun 2017 22:05:47
When do you expect an announcement BigD?

Cheers,

Agree2 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 22:13:34
The only remaining thing pal is finishing your post with

Thanks

Macca

Im sorry but unless you can offer us something in return like never coming on here again if your lying then i can't take any notice. Put your money where your mouth is haha.

Agree2 Disagree14

06 Jun 2017 22:22:12
The source where i get my info from was the first to break the news about:

Wenger signing a new 2 year deal.

Ernesto Valverde joining Barcelona on a 3 year contract.

Confirmed a deal for VVD even before Macca and broke the Salah news.

So yes i believe him.

Agree16 Disagree4

{Ed025's Note - you dont have to justify yourself BigD..

06 Jun 2017 22:37:37
All three of the things you mentioned were well known mate months before they were confirmed.

Agree4 Disagree12

06 Jun 2017 22:45:08
Big D
Do you think VVD will sign for us mate?

Agree1 Disagree2

07 Jun 2017 00:12:39
Supermane96, always so negative. Thanks for the confirmation Big D. I've only been aware of the VVD stuff, nice to hear Salah is going to be wearing red. Class player, will fit right in to our exciting attack.

Agree7 Disagree1

07 Jun 2017 06:43:02
Supermane fills these pages with so much rubbish then has the cheek to call someone out.

Agree9 Disagree0

07 Jun 2017 08:14:32
When people are posting "reliable source" rumours that was in the papers and on the net the night previous, then i am going to call someone on it.

People like macca, ed, square tomato tell us stuff we don't know and haven't found. well before others get on it. Ed2 was telling us most of our targets in december and your lording big d for recycling the mirror rumours

Also im only looking out for the eds and big d. Because if he is just repeating already unreliable rumours then there will be uproar on here because you will already have salah signed and sealed for us but if doesn't happen then there will be quite a lot of bad posts. i was here for the 2015 kovacic scandal. You might all be abit young to remember that.

I also love how if someone doesn't agree with someone jts rubbish, but if they follow a blind man into a cave then there's praise.

Sheep comes to mind.

Agree2 Disagree3

07 Jun 2017 10:33:31
Its a rumours page Supermane, chill out mate! We come on here to read rumours, people shouldn't be so gullible as to take anything posted on here as gospel. Believe it when you see the player with Klopp signing the contract.

Agree1 Disagree0

07 Jun 2017 11:00:37
It's a rumour page, it might be one that everyone knows about but nobody knows the agreed fee. It makes a difference from the constant barrage of questions at the eds or people regurgitating views.
The Kocacic rumour was started by an Ed if I remember myself, hence why it went in over drive. Sometimes deals fall at the final hurdle, one of my best friends has a contact within the club and he keeps his cards close to his chest and if he does say anything it's generally after it's been posted on here but last year he said Gotze was joining, so even blokes working for the club get it wrong.

Agree1 Disagree0

07 Jun 2017 12:19:55
Supermane96, last week i gave update on VVD saying he was a done deal according to a reliable source. This was during the time when the ed's were split on us either not being in for him, or that we had no chance against Chelsea/ city. Check the posts if you like. I was laughed at but just a week later everything began to unfold (and still seems to be rumbling on) . I'm certainly no macca, just managed to catch the info and shared it here. You could learn from this experience that not every post here is utter B. S. unless it comes from certain people. Peace out.

Agree1 Disagree0

07 Jun 2017 15:39:57
Supermane96 - Im just passing on info. If VVD or Salah don't join us than i will remove myself from here and jut follow the site as a reader, im very confident in my source!

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2017 15:41:12
BigD double check with your source again about the price. He stated £32.7m a few days back.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2017 15:42:28
Dp people forget that this is a rumor site? I get it that you may not want to believe anyone apart from the Eds and Macca but no need to jump on someone who posts something out of goodwill.

Agree1 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 18:38:39
Hearing City are close to signing Bertrand. What's this mean for Mendy then eds? Surely Bertrand is the alternative for City, so is there any interest in Mendy from any other clubs? Also, great work lately, on here every day checking updates!

Believable2 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - It doesn't mean anything for Mendy directly. Players are being priced beyond a move by clubs and clubs are stepping away if they don't see the value.}

06 Jun 2017 20:17:18
Well most are Ed.

Agree4 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 18:32:33
Eds Are we still pursuing Christian Pulisic or is he likely to remain at Dortmund? Appreciate the work you guys are doing to keep us up to date!

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I am not aware of any approach by Liverpool.}

06 Jun 2017 21:20:24
That's because we don't approach the clubs ed2, it's all about getting the player on board and then we think 'oh yeah, better let there club know we just sent them all the training gear ready for them to do the Melwood lean pictures tomorrow'.

Agree2 Disagree0

07 Jun 2017 15:40:05
Hate to say it, but if salah does sign, think it's an end to any Pulisic to liverpool dreams unless one of the front 3 leaves. Missed the boat on signing him when we wouldn't meet dortmunds price right after Klopp came.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 18:29:32
French press have suggested LFC have enquired about Gaetan Laborde. Do any eds know anything of this or is it simply rubbish? Thanks as always.

Believable2 Unbelievable2

{Ed002's Note - He has recently agreed a new contract and it would make little sense given he is non home grown and would require the club to move a player on in his place.}

06 Jun 2017 18:49:00
Thanks for the prompt response Ed. Have a good evening.

Agree2 Disagree1

06 Jun 2017 18:23:37
The mirror are reporting we have a chance to land pulisic any truth in that or paper talk rubbish?

Believable1 Unbelievable3

{Ed002's Note - I am not aware of any approach by Liverpool.}

06 Jun 2017 19:56:06
Ah the mirror. Complete and utter garbage. As if there is not enough actual transfer drama going on without them bringing up some old non-story that has zero basis in reality.

Agree9 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 21:58:36
John Cross works for them. That should say enough about that rag.

Agree3 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 17:42:43
Eds has there been any interest from anyone in relation to Sahko?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Yes, Crystal Palace but Liverpool has priced him out of a move there.}

06 Jun 2017 19:07:00
Just Palace? Surprises me that I thought there would be more than one. 30 million in this market doesn't seem unreasonable to me. Cheers for the reply.

Agree7 Disagree1

06 Jun 2017 19:48:52
£30m is unreasonable for a player who is well known to have no future at his current club, imo.

Agree4 Disagree7

06 Jun 2017 20:13:12
I'd like to see sahko and klopp make up. All this money for vvd, a quick, athletic ball playing CB when we have one coming back from an impressive loan period with palace. I think the pressure of being such an expensive defender coming to a big club affected him. He's cool though now. and eds. any thing about sturridge going? I think that would be crazy. If he played for someone else, and we were looking to buy him I think ink we'd be well chuffed. He behaved with dignity this season and when given his chance he lit the place up. Please don't sell him J.

Agree0 Disagree5

{Ed025's Note - not much chance of klopp and sakho ever making up jonny and besides he is nowhere near as good as VVD, studge is a very good player but he lacks a heart im afraid, when the going gets tough he disappears to the treatment room..

06 Jun 2017 20:54:53
Genuinely think the last few months have shown sturridge to have a good attitude, helped us a lot at the end. He may be injury prone but on form he's the best striker we have.

Agree6 Disagree1

06 Jun 2017 21:02:37
It's such a shame ed. What percentage would you say there is of selling him? Ya know 50% chance of him going? I think he'd be good in ucl. Big
Games. Always scores for england. Cl not as rough as prem. Super sub? Next fairclough! Sturridge I'm talking about.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed025's Note - if i was liverpool i would keep hold of him jonny and play him in CL games, league cup and FA cup games like you say, if you get a striker he could be rested for this type of game then mate..

06 Jun 2017 21:04:26
Fair enough Bout sahko eds. Thanks mate. Legend.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed025's Note - no probs mate..

06 Jun 2017 22:00:11
Are you saying Sturridge fakes injuries when things are not going well Ed025? Because that's a pretty strong accusations and do you have anything to back that up?

Agree0 Disagree2

{Ed025's Note - im saying hes a wimp AG, cries off at the least excuse and as klopp has said to him "how injured are you" because some proper players will play with a slight knock or strain, he would cry off with a broken finger nail or split ends and needs to man up a bit, its just my view but if you can prove me wrong then im all ears mate..

06 Jun 2017 23:11:35
I agree that he seems like a player who won't play unless he feels he is 100% fit, which is difficult I would imagine for even the fittest footballer.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed025's Note - its a shame really AG as hes very talented mate..

07 Jun 2017 07:29:37
In my opinion he lacks the competitive spirit.
Some players have half his talent but twice his competitive edge. Like Diego Costa. I think he's far less talented than DS, but he scraps for everything which is why he's so difficult to play against.
It's not his attitude, he's just not got that mentality.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 17:55:42
So we have deals done will 2 players, that's awesome, shame we have to agree fees with the clubs

😂😂.

Believable11 Unbelievable8

06 Jun 2017 16:35:37
I Hear klopps looking at a German player called max meyler do you think that's his second choice if the salah deal dosnt go through?

Believable1 Unbelievable11

06 Jun 2017 16:49:52
I thought meyer was a central attacking midfielder and therefore I'm sure one of the Eds has said he would be considered if Couts was leaving as a like for like?

Agree1 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 17:16:45
I see . I don't know anything about him all I Hurd was attacking midfielder so just put 2 and 2 together. I hope we sign salah I think he would give us something different which is a good thing.

Agree2 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 17:45:41
Spurs are looking at him.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Max Meyer fits the bill of a young attacking midfield player which prompted previous bids from Chelsea (who would have sent him on loan for one season before integrating him in to the squad) and Fiorentina in 2014. Schalke 04 do not want to sell the player and made it clear to Spurs and Milan who were showing an interest this past summer that any move was unlikely - going as far as turning down an offer of €47M. The player has shared his desire to play in Spain with Real Madrid or Barcelona or to play in England. Other sides such as Bayern Munich, Liverpool and Arsenal watched him last season but had no real interest. If Liverpool were to lose Coutinho and/or Firmino he could be a player they may look to but right now they haven't. Spurs remain very interested and he is refusing to extend his contract making a move possible this summer.}

06 Jun 2017 16:33:19
Hi Ed's,

Any news on the VVD transfer? Do the latest developments mean we may miss out?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - there is no development, we still have to agree terms with Saints.}

06 Jun 2017 16:43:50
It will be fine. Saints reported spurs over toby what ever his name is. It's probably just postern and sour grapes. Just a matter of time I think. Ynwa.

Agree6 Disagree2

06 Jun 2017 16:43:58
It's done according to Graeme Kelly who is the only person to know about our interest since March, £44 mil plus 8mil add ons.

Agree9 Disagree2

06 Jun 2017 16:59:13
That Kelly bloke reckons it's already sorted. He also said ( yesterday ) that there will be a statement of some sort ( today ) wouldn't disclose as he said it would annoy the fans?

Dunno how reliable he is. I just go with the Ed's and Macca.

Agree6 Disagree1

06 Jun 2017 16:52:28
On yahoo it says this
Southampton have asked the Premier League to investigate an alleged illegal approach from Liverpool for Virgil van Dijk, according to reports.

Southampton are angered by the Reds allegedly making contact with Van Dijk without permission and have made it clear to the Premier League that they have received no official approach for the player.

READ MORE: Premier League 2017/ 18 – Every team, every signing for next season

Van Dijk is expected to leave the south coast this summer but Southampton are unwilling to let the Dutchman leave. It has been widely reported the Dutchman prefers a move to Anfield, but he’s also being chased by Chelsea and Manchester City.

Liverpool are willing to pay a world-record sum for a defender – expected to be around £60m – to break Southampton’s resistance while they are also prepared to match City’s offer of a contract worth around £200,000 a week.

Van Dijk would become Liverpool’s record signing and highest-paid player should the deal go ahead.
He has five years to run on his contract, meaning Southampton are in a strong position regarding his future.

Agree0 Disagree1

06 Jun 2017 17:36:52
Thing is Alderwield wasn't a Saint player.

Agree5 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 17:41:33
Its a possibility of a fine and point deduction. Wont affect the deal for VVD as long as we agree figure with Saints. That about right ed?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - it really depends on what the crime is that we are being accused of. Until we know for sure what Saints' complaint actually is, no one can possibly know what the punishment could be.}

06 Jun 2017 18:03:35
I think its the fact we didn't get permission from them. Great stuff . I guess that's that then. Transfer ban likely. No vvd salah etc. Jesus christ Liverpook why owe why! Aaaarrrrgggghhhjh.

Agree1 Disagree10

06 Jun 2017 18:24:58
Am I not right in saying Southampton have a history of doing this to clubs. They did it with Clyne, and alderweireld. As well as that every paper has printed both Pep and Conte have spoken to VVD, so I think it's all a load of bs just to get more money, some even saying trying to force VVD to City because they are paying more.
I trust Macca when he says it's done as well as others who seem to have decent knowledge. Big up all the eds btw.

Agree6 Disagree1

07 Jun 2017 02:48:27
How could Saints have done it with Aldeweireld if he was never actually owned by Southampton? He was only loaned there.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - they had agreed a deal to sign him, terms were agreed with the player, then Spurs stepped in and he changed his mind.}

07 Jun 2017 15:39:38
My understanding is that some news recently have made Southampton reconsider whether we have behaved appropriately. And they has asked for an investigation based on this. This does not mean we have misbehaved or that we haven't.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 14:52:14
Hi ed. What the latest situation regarding mo salah, do you think will sign him or look elsewhere also what's the latest regarding jon Flanagan. Cheers reddave.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed025's Note - it looks like salah will happen 42 but i have no news on JF mate..

06 Jun 2017 13:57:52
Any truth in these Faouzi Ghoulam rumours Napoli left back.

Believable2 Unbelievable7

06 Jun 2017 11:38:47
The press association have said Southampton have asked the Premier League to investigate alleged illegal approach from Liverpool for VVD!

Believable7 Unbelievable2

06 Jun 2017 12:02:34
Nothing will come of this.

They have done this before with Toby and are just trying to please there fans in thinking that there trying to keep him.

Agree8 Disagree4

06 Jun 2017 12:06:43
Does this mean the "deal" is now in serious jeopardy? Or is it just Soton trying to wrestle back some fee control? What a pain!

Agree3 Disagree3

{Ed001's Note - no way to be sure yet.}

06 Jun 2017 12:12:13
Liverpool contacted Southampton in March to ask for permission to talk to Van Dijk.

Agree7 Disagree4

06 Jun 2017 12:31:33
I'm glad you are all so optimistic, it's not the first time we have been criticized for actions involving transfers.

Agree3 Disagree2

06 Jun 2017 12:29:16
Have no other clubs talked to the player or his reps?

Agree0 Disagree1

06 Jun 2017 12:45:19
BigD that can't be true if ed001 asserts we only started pursuing him until his agent approached us.

Agree1 Disagree2

06 Jun 2017 12:53:10
EDs If they know VVD wants to leave for Liverpool and they are willing to accept the offer what do Southampton have to gain from this?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - stopping other clubs unsettling their players in future.}

06 Jun 2017 12:59:33
I'd be salty too if I was a feeder club like Southampton 😂.

Agree4 Disagree3

06 Jun 2017 13:03:53
Ed, has the permission got to be in writing or would a verbal response be enough?

Agree1 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - verbal agreements are binding in law.}

06 Jun 2017 13:25:55
Robin in the Hood believe what you want, im just passing on info from several people. They tried the same tactics before so im not at all worried.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 13:30:32
At the very least, possibly best, case scenario, will this delay any pending deal a good while?

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 13:23:11
Thanks Ed, I thought that too, but just needed confirmation.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 13:28:32
Seems a strange thing for Southampton to do ed, we must have an excellent relationship with them as we buy so many of their players, wouldn't Southampton reporting us muddy the waters a bit.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - we don't have an excellent relationship with them.}

06 Jun 2017 13:28:40
ED01 it was suggested that VVD's agent approached us and that we had no interest in signing a CB this summer but as the player was interested in joining then we have moved forward with this.

I am slightly confused and a little disappointed if we have not learnt from previous mistakes as we should of approached the club at that point.

Do you know anymore other than what the press are saying on it ED01?

Thanks.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - not yet.}

06 Jun 2017 13:40:41
How can you prove a verbal agreement has been in place? I smell a rat.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 13:50:17
Can't believe we've been that stupid. Lfc lawyers would have been advising. Saints grasping at straws.

Agree0 Disagree1

06 Jun 2017 14:42:13
Players have agents and if that is considered illegal then every club is liable.

Agree1 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 14:54:05
We either wanted a CB or we didn't. I can't believe that Klopp didn't want one but then suddenly said ' oh yeah we do that's a good idea ' just because vvd's agent says he wants to join.

Agree1 Disagree1

{Ed025's Note - i think he read on here that you need one kimos.. :)

06 Jun 2017 16:36:52
Ha! If that's the case Ed then we can look forward to a whole new team!

Agree3 Disagree0

{Ed025's Note - your right there mate..

06 Jun 2017 18:08:47
Yeah Ed0025 :)

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2017 15:37:47
So basically they are saying we didn't ask permission to speak to vvd. but they gave permission to chelsea and city. So they basically saying he's for sale . once that decision is made it should be a free for all for any interested parties to speak to the player. what a rubbish rule. They just wanted a bidding war between city and Chelsea, vvd stated he wanted liverpool transfer and they've spat their dummy out. This is 50 million southampton. greedy sods.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 11:35:18
God damn, Southampton reporting us to the authorities over tapping up of Van Dijk. A little bit weird seeing as by all accounts it seemed like he was the desperate one and we'd heard we did it all correctly.

Believable7 Unbelievable2

06 Jun 2017 12:03:58
If we hadn't agreed a fee how has Klopp been allowed to speak directly to him, as reported?
With FSG going all funny on the Salah deal we could end up with no one and a ban. Things change quick.

Agree4 Disagree8

06 Jun 2017 14:37:50
Max FSG has not gone funny, they have simple said we will not be held to ransom for a player, its good business. Also i always thought it was that VVD was sold on Klopps vision, this could just be that Klopp has spoken with the Agent who has relayed this on?

Agree2 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 14:53:00
Not giving excuses but his agent came to us. We did not go to him and Saints were already approached in March about VVD so don't really know what they are playing at. I think they were just mad that there will be no bidding war hence, more money for them as every man and his dog knew he would leave. Also, reports show that VVD spoke to Conte and Pep as well but the Saints' ain't mad about that, are they? Let's see what happens before aportioniong blame to whoever.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 15:53:14
Alex a price is set by Roma, £40m, who will accept less £35m. We agree terms and then offer £29m.

We used to do this and lose out. I appreciate negotiations etc but it's hardly like we accept anything less then the price we set for players. So yeah they've gone a bit funny and the deal is on the rocks.

We quote £30m to Palace for Sakho and won't entertain a lesser bid. Yet we mess other clubs around for their players. It's embarrassing. It's almost misleading.

Agree1 Disagree2

06 Jun 2017 11:34:48
What is going on with Soton reporting us? Anybody heard anything on the details? Are we in the wrong?

Red Sandman.

Believable1 Unbelievable1

{Ed025's Note - according to radio solent..

06 Jun 2017 12:45:50
Not to excuse Liverpool if they actually have gotten this wrong (and hopefully if they did it's a genuine mistake and resolvable rather than arrogance or outright incompetence) however I do think the whole system is flawed.

In what kind of world is speaking to a players agent not effectively speaking to the player themselves? It should be black and white IMO. without permission from the club there should be no communication with players or the players agent to discuss a possible transfer under any circumstances.

Agree2 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 13:01:08
Soton) probably favour a man city deal as it will offer more cash straight up. Our deal likely to feature more add ons and clauses. Let's hope the pony tailed warrior is set on liverpool. I think he is. That's why they're making a fuss though imo.

Agree3 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 15:04:22
Exactly, Jonny. Remember, his agent came to us. We did not go to him meaning, VVD has his mind set on playing for LFC. To me, this is a ploy to send VVD to City against his wish cos they obviously want the money.

They don't want to sell to us cos a) they don't like us and b) they want more money from City who like Chelsea, spoke to him as well via Pep and Conte but the Saints are clearly fine with that.

Now if we did anything wrong which I doubt then we need to take whatever punishment we get and assume that the VVD deal is dead. And if we didn't then Saints will be looking like desperate people who are just Salty cos VVD chose us which means less money for them.

Agree1 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 16:08:17
Can't work like that Zimbo. We'd have never bothered unless his agent sounded us out.
Also if we want say Moreno to go, we'd like his agent to see what's out there. Moreno isn't listed, not sure transfer list even exists anymore.

Also most clubs don't want to sell their players, not going to speak to anyone otherwise.

Agree1 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 11:24:49
EDS, is there any basis for Southampton reporting us to PL for illegal approach of VVD?

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - yes there is a basis as the club should not have done anything until after speaking to Saints. The only question is whether or not we were led to believe the club knew about us speaking to the player.}

06 Jun 2017 11:45:51
United fan here in peace.

Just a quick follow up @Ed001

Aren't Liverpool and Klopp already in hot water over a previous illegal approach made for a player? (Can't remember which but do remember Ed002 mentioning something)

This could turn ugly pretty quick for Liverpool if there is any truth in Southampton's claims.

Agree2 Disagree7

{Ed001's Note - yes though this is very different.}

06 Jun 2017 11:57:50
I thought with us having a new CEO we wouldn't be seeing stories like this anymore from our club, if true i can't believe we could have been so idiotic to speak with vvd without consent from saints.

Agree5 Disagree1

06 Jun 2017 12:05:10
Ed I can't beleive we might have been this stupid. Surely we have not? Could this scupper the deal?

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - it could yes.}

06 Jun 2017 12:13:14
If this turns out to be true then we will deserve everything we get. Absolutely shocking (if true) that we are still carrying on this way, we should damn well know better.

Agree4 Disagree2

06 Jun 2017 12:40:58
ED1 - thanks for the reply, I guess the follow on question would be, is there any evidence?

It seems somewhat churlish, especially with the amount of money we've "invested" after buying half of their team in the past! It's seems apparent that VVD wants to go elsewhere (us, City or Chelsea all expresing interesting) and I find it hard to believe that we'd be stupid enough not to follow the proper process.

If no evidence can be found and Soton still decide not to do a deal with us, would it go to a tribunal to resolve, or is VVD foced into a dilema of continuing to play for Saints or having to chose another club?

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - he wants to go regardless. They could end up in a Fonte situation.}

06 Jun 2017 13:44:50
Ed1, oils you remind me which deal previously Klopp had gotten into trouble for tapping up with. I remember that Gerrard approached Kroos obviously the Dempsey fiasco had us in trouble but what has Klopp done wrongly?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I don't remember mate, Ed002 would be the one to ask.}

06 Jun 2017 14:55:29
i believe the player was Zielinski last summer.

Agree1 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 15:02:08
If I am not mistaken, it is Zielinski who ended up at Napoli.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 15:06:46
I know of the deal regarding Zeilinski last summer who Klopp tapped up and Udinese refused to sell to us and sold him against his wish, to Napoli even tho we offered more money in fees.

Agree0 Disagree1

06 Jun 2017 11:22:15
Any truth in saints reporting an illegal approach ed? Still reckon vvd will happen?

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - I don't know. It does seem likely they will and with good reason, even if the approach was not from us we should have spoken to them first.}

06 Jun 2017 11:18:58
Have we tapped up VVD?

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed025's Note - not as far as we know JJ..

06 Jun 2017 11:18:49
See some rumours that Liverpool are not willing to meet Roma valuation of Salah and this may put deal in jeopardy. Any truth in this eds?

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed025's Note - as far as i know things have gone well, you will hear lots of things like this though on most deals red one..

06 Jun 2017 11:37:39
No that's not the case Red One. It's simply negotiations. You don't go and pay what they want. You say no no that's too much we are not willing to pay that. And then offer lower.

Agree2 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 11:15:04
Southampton's Daily Echo reporting that Southampton have asked the Premier League to investigate an illegal approach for VVD by Liverpool.

I sincerely hope we haven't been this monumentally stupid (again) and we did everything above board.

Believable3 Unbelievable3

06 Jun 2017 11:39:08
So they don't want £60m for VVD? I call bullsh*t.

Agree2 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - that is not the issue. You are failing to understand.}

06 Jun 2017 12:46:19
I get it Ed but my point I was trying to make is if they're willing and happy to sell at 60m then why would they report us and in turn scupper the deal?
I just don't believe it.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - that is irrelevant. You can still be annoyed by someone being underhand.}

06 Jun 2017 10:42:04
Ed025. The Echo have reported we won't be held to ransome on Salah and are considering other options?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed025's Note - they are just playing the game KR, i still expect him to be a liverpool player mate..

06 Jun 2017 11:08:38
Do Roma want £35 million or have they upped their evaluation?

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed025's Note - they want as much as they can screw liverpool for mate..

06 Jun 2017 13:05:36
They screwed us with aqualani all them years ago. Oh hang on it was raga who bought an injured player.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 15:08:22
Greatest LFC manager ever, according to harry, madmax.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 10:43:41
Hi Ed001

Can you provide a transfer update on your end? as Macca has come out and given us all lots of Happiness wondered what your take on it all is?

Thanks.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - what kind of update? There is nothing really to add right now. Salah, Mendy and VVD all want to sign, agreeing a deal with the clubs is not there yet on any of those three though. Right now that is the main focus of the club, though Robertson is still a very strong option and will be moved on with if Monaco will not budge on Mendy (which seems likely).}

06 Jun 2017 10:52:55
Could not be a better summer if they all come off.

Be devstated about mendy myself.

Are we likely to pursue say keita ed if we fail with mendy?

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - unrelated.}

06 Jun 2017 10:53:22
Pardon my ignorance ED but do u mean Monaco not budging on the price of Mendy or just selling him in general.?

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - both.}

06 Jun 2017 11:24:16
Hi Ed001 are we a long way apart on valuation and wage? I would be very happy to sign VVD, Salah and Mendy and conclude our incomings. I know you really like Mendy and the window is not even open yet so I will hope for the best. A massive upgrade on left back is our most important position IMO.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - yes on price.}

06 Jun 2017 11:27:13
Throw in Sakho and/ or Moreno and/ or Markovic to Monaco plus cash for Mendy?

Before anyone says, I know this isn't FM and am only half joking but does seem to be some talk of adding a player to deals this morning to reduce the cash cost.

Agree3 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 11:40:19
Ed001
How much are Monaco asking for Mendy?

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - what does it matter?}

06 Jun 2017 12:52:29
I think toon red has a good point. I could see sahko at Monaco and it sure would make mendy more affordable. I still see Robertson as a good option. If we could do a swap with Monaco then perhaps we could pinch both. Imo you need at least two options for each position. Then we can see the best of Milner in his preferred position. Experience really is vital in cl.

Agree1 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 12:56:45
Hi ed. At the end of the season I was hoping we'd be linked with mahrez (needs to up his work rate but that is possible under klopp) siggurson and vvd. Be interesting to see siggurson in a good team. I know we're close on vvd (I hope the vvd deal doesn't fall through) have you heard anything at all about the others? Do you think siggurson could cut it at melwood?

Agree0 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - no and no.}

06 Jun 2017 10:32:08
Eds has City's Mendy bid been rejected? Do you expect they will still make a deal? Is there any crumb of hope that he could end up at Liverpool instead? Thanks.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - City have not met the asking price. They might well return but Pep has other options to go for.}

06 Jun 2017 10:42:02
Looks like City will go after Bertrand. Ed002 has also mentioned Bernat and both options would be much cheaper for City compared to Mendy.
Mendy though will have to force the move imo. Monaco may not budge on the asking price and after the money being set aside for VVD, I cannot see Klopp spending another 40 million on a defender.

Agree2 Disagree3

06 Jun 2017 10:42:22
It must be a high asking price if city are thinking of looking elsewhere. I assume it's very much an outside chance that we will get him?

Agree2 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 10:57:12
Mendy looks like a quality player, again I'm sat in the 'he's not 4x the player of Robertson' camp, But what I don't understand is this, the two positions we absolutely need to sort out are LB (with no offence to Milner at all) and LW. If we do get Salah and VVD neither have been sorted unless Salah will play out of position, and a massive amount of money has been spent.

My question to Ed's if available is if we do get VVD, will this affect our other targets due to the amount of £££ being spent on him?

Thanks in advance for all the hard work.

Agree1 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 11:37:29
Why do people keep saying Salah will play out of position? its infuriating research the bloody players yes Salah had a great season on the RW for Roma but he has played LW constantly for Basel and for Fiorentina, Our frontline do not stick to there positions you think all of Mane goals have come down the RW him hugging that line? no he has come inside and gone down the middle while Bobby went out wide Salah would be perfect for the club on the left or if Klopp wanted he could move Mane out to the Left since he played there for Southampton and Red Bull.

Agree1 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 15:12:00
Spot on, Kloppers. People are too fixated on where the players play in a front three knowing fully well that our front three interchange at will which is what the opposition defences cannot deal with. Salah can play on either side so don't get where him being "out of position" comes from.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 10:06:51
Hi Eds,

Do we have any interest in Gianluigi Donnarumma? I know that this is not our main priority but with only 12 months left on his contract it would be a great signing and hopefully at a lesser price than you would normally expect.

Believable0 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - not an option for us at this time.}

06 Jun 2017 10:38:39
Half of the world is chasing him mate.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I would say going for the Italy U20s keeper would be the better bet, judging by his performances at the U20s World Cup. He has been outstanding and I don't believe he has Mino as his agent, so wouldn't cripple our wage bill.}

06 Jun 2017 10:45:40
He has been very good Ed. Made some quality saves against Zambia.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 10:52:33
Would love Donnarumma but getting a new goalkeeper isn't a priority. We need to get in a LB (Mendy), winger (Salah), CB (VVD) and CM (Keita) first even if it's going to cost the world. Also, Karius has barely had a proper chance and Klopp loves him, and if Migs continues to improve at his current rate, we won't need a new goalkeeper anytime soon.

Agree4 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 15:12:43
We also need a RB cos Clyne is flat out pants.

Agree1 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 09:35:16
First of Eds, thanks for all your hard work and effort to this page and us gossip craving users. Its very much aprreciated! This page is a necessity for us supporters, with all the rumours sourrunding a club like Liverpool in these times, to help us keep the feet on the ground.

Second. I just read that Renato Sanchez of Bayern might become available for transfer. Could he be a alternativ to Naby Keita now he seems Leipzig bound? Sure Sanchez must have been a player Klopp have been wathing, before he joined Bayern.

Third. I will be happy to see both Virgil and Salah in the door. Both are able to strength the starter, and the width of the squad. To be honest, I don't lie sleepless over the pricetags, even though it's unreal amounts, but as the Eds said, "money has ruind the game". We might just go with it, and Im not their banker. Im here to be entertained by quality football and hopefully some trophys to go with it. How many times have'nt we heard somebody say "Id rather have one quality player, than 4 mediocre players". Well there you have it. It's properly the same people whos whining over the VVD pricetag now.

FOURTH. Can we expect to see another winger or striker being brought in, or will Salah or Mane be converted to the left side?


Fifth and last off. Let's get that LB sorted. I don't see Robertson as better than Moreno, and he wants to wait through the summer to see the options. Why won't we match Mendys requests, like we do with Virgil. It seems like non-sence not to, if the lad would choose us! He is quality.

Cheers.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - 1. Thank you very much mate.
2. I don't expect Sanchez to be an option for us.
4. Mane was a left winger for much of his career.
5. Mendy is still a possibility.}

06 Jun 2017 10:45:48
Likewise thanks a lot Ed, incredible job at what must be a frantic time for you guys and things changing daily

If we somehow manage to close Salah, VVD and Mendy I think I'm going to freak.

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - cheers zim.}

06 Jun 2017 10:49:40
OMG if we get Mendy as well I will run around the streets with my arms out making an aeroplane sound for 2 whole minutes. Nyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed025's Note - dont bank on mendy just yet JM, its possible of course but i would not be revving up my engines just yet mate.. :)

06 Jun 2017 09:24:27
G'day Eds.
Any idea if Cédric Soares is among the right backs that Liverpool have interest in?
Thanks a bunch as always.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - I don't expect him to move this summer, so it is irrelevant that we have interest in him.}

06 Jun 2017 10:45:46
Okay, thanks Ed001.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 10:55:53
Is a decent player though.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 07:00:52
Ed 002, you seemed to think Klopp was not after a Centre back but is now ready to spend the largest amount of our transfer war chest on exactly that. Has Klopp been playing his cards close to his chest. or is this just a last minute knee jerk reaction?

Believable3 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Yes Klipperty clearly sees the likes of Joe Gomez as not needed.}

06 Jun 2017 08:46:29
But why VVD? I prefer his compatriot De Vrij.

Agree3 Disagree15

06 Jun 2017 09:08:17
This came very late mate. We brought the bet CB in the league and let's happily move on. I am pretty sure the club will offload a few to make space for VVD. Gomez and Sakho will raise money as well free up some wages.

Agree5 Disagree1

06 Jun 2017 09:40:57
Don't listen to anything you hear regarding what klopp wants to do, everyone at Liverpool keep their cards close to their chest, a CB was always going to come in. I still think he fancies a striker and he's happy with milner as left back maybe getting Robertson in as cover, but who knows. time will tell.

Agree1 Disagree2

06 Jun 2017 09:49:40
Not so sure about he´s the best in the league, what about Luiz, Bailly, Alderweireld and Vertongen?

Agree1 Disagree2

06 Jun 2017 10:02:36
Why VVD? Are you serious? . Again with the negativity, the owners can't win with some people. if FSG decide he's worth breaking a record or 2 for then he's worth it to them so let them pay it! if we lost the chance to sign him by going in low they'd be ridiculed. im happy they are trying to get business done early and willing to invest a hell of a lot of money with klopp to strengthen the team. although I hope they tell him No to Robertson if im honest ;)

Agree5 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 10:08:03
And Kompany (when fit)

Agree2 Disagree4

06 Jun 2017 10:18:03
Why is no one thinking Klopp might not think he made a mistake with Klavan, and he will be the one to go? Why would we get rid of a young just because we need to fix a CB issue now? I don't see why Gomez has to go just because Klopp was the one who wanted Klavan? He hardly said Klavan was his first choice.

Agree4 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 10:19:41
Red fuzz out of the 4 you mentioned I'd say only Alderweireld was a match for vvd. Granted Bailly looks a good signing he was very rash at times and often lucky not to get 2nd yellow on a number of occasions (the words of a few utd fans I know) Also on reading a lot of Saint's fans forums they nearly all said vvd was best C, bk they've had inc Alderweireld! Let's hope so. May I just say Ed025 has been brilliant in recent days in dealing with the negative lot and putting things into perspective.

Agree2 Disagree1

06 Jun 2017 10:21:49
It's hardly knee jerk when the transfer window hasn't even opened yet.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 10:32:46
Alderweireld is the best CB in the league imo. VVD though could be right up there as he has all the ability and tools to be the best but he needs to work on his defensive nous. Hopefully, Klopp can bring out the best in him.

Agree0 Disagree1

06 Jun 2017 10:33:53
I have him behind Alderwerield, Vertongen and Koschielney but with the potential to overtake all 3. Not a huge fan of Kuiz but I agree Bailly looks quality but he's not played enough to be rated so high.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 07:06:36
No airport or cousin rumour till now. hope they start soon🤓🤓.

Believable4 Unbelievable0

{Ed025's Note - you can be sure they will liverbird..

06 Jun 2017 10:27:40
I can confirm my cousin is currently rumoured to be at an airport, I will keep you updated.

Agree4 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 11:07:28
Turned out to not be true, he was at a train station.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed025's Note - love it angry..

06 Jun 2017 07:06:19
Ox staying at Arsenal, chances of coming to Liverpool finished.

Believable21 Unbelievable1

06 Jun 2017 08:00:43
Great!

Agree11 Disagree2

06 Jun 2017 09:17:05
Bullet dodged.

Agree4 Disagree2

06 Jun 2017 10:33:06
Thank God!

Agree3 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 15:14:31
Thank heavens they kept him. They can keep his poor, stagnating arse away from us.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 00:30:54
Rumours of Ghoulam of Napoli? Sounds like lazy 'who's a decent lb in Europe we can link with liverpool' reporting to me. Eds?

Believable0 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - I am not aware of Liverpool making any approach for Ghoulam.}

06 Jun 2017 06:39:54
Imagine getting Ghoulam, we'd be one club to rule them all.

Agree8 Disagree4

06 Jun 2017 07:51:40
I'll go with that, Robin. Starring Phillipe Coutinho as Frodo as he breaks thrugh the iron defences of Mordorchester United bringing the downfall of ths Sour-one?

Agree6 Disagree3

06 Jun 2017 08:02:14
Andy, get a girlfriend :)

Agree9 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 08:51:36
don't listen to polecat andy, I have a girlfriend there not worth the hassle lol.

Agree7 Disagree0

06 Jun 2017 09:09:07
As well as the mrs? 😯
I'm in enough bother as it is!

Agree6 Disagree0

 
Change Consent