Liverpool Rumours Archive September 04 2010

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.


04 Sep 2010 23:25:00
It might of been caused by moores it as definatly been caused by the yanks so i wouldn't call it a back door it is because the yanks bought us with the banks money so if the bank do take us over that is called progression (if we borrowed money from the bank for our house and fail to pay they take the house) and will probably mean more buyers will come out of the woodwork to buy the club for a reasonable price

It is back door option, as the club allowed itself to be put in this position by selling to these d* *heads. The club has to accept the responsibility. Like Man Ure will eventually. I hope we are bought but in the right way. Not through the back door. .

Dirks Engine Room

()()

 

 

 

 

 

04 Sep 2010 23:12:03
We might not have any choice Dirks if it takes the banks to get rid of G&H then so be it.

Blair Mayne YNWA

I do not think the bank would want the publicity in owning a football club when it has just relinquished 3000 staff of their jobs.

Unfortunately, like last time, and the time before that, the bank will probably grant an extension, as the club is making a profit at one end.

Would hate to see the club in hand of banks. And if it is then we should take penalty, because this would be no diffferent to Portsmouth and Leeds.

Dirks Engine Room

()()

 

 

 

 

 

04 Sep 2010 23:10:42
Just found this what do you think ed? {ed's note - it makes little difference if true, the bank will just sell the club on anyway. They won't want to run the club.}

ED do you think it would be a good idea IF the banks did takeover without the 9 point deduction of course just to get of G&H?.

Blair Mayne YNWA

{EDITOR'S NOTE: Give me 10 mins to think about that 1 mate}

It would not be right. Whether we like it or not, Moores allowed these two dipsh*ts to buy the club. We are stuck with them until someone (hopefully soon) buys us.

The club has to be sold correctly to the right buyer (if that exists) not through the back door to the bank.

We are a club that does things in the right way, and when Shanks took over, it took time, and so we must be patient and have faith.

Dirks Engine Room

We might not have any choice Dirks if it takes the banks to get rid of G&H then so be it.

Blair Mayne YNWA

it might of been caused by moores it as definatly been caused by the yanks so i wouldn't call it a back door it is because the yanks bought us with the banks money so if the bank do take us over that is called progression (if we borrowed money from the bank for our house and fail to pay they take the house) and will probably mean more buyers will come out of the woodwork to buy the club for a reasonable price

()()

 

 

 

 

 

04 Sep 2010 23:04:15
Not a Liverpool rumour but The Sunday Mirror is going to run a story (on Sunday, oddly enough) naming and shaming the England player who has been caught with his pants down.

The player? Wayne Rooney, and I can't wait to wind up all the Mancs (not one of them from Manchester) that I know.

Long may it affect his form for United.

- -Michael Bland- -

()()

 

 

 

 

 

04 Sep 2010 22:52:57
04 Sep 2010 22:47:56
Just found this what do you think ed? {ed's note - it makes little difference if true, the bank will just sell the club on anyway. They won't want to run the club.}

ED do you think it would be a good idea IF the banks did takeover without the 9 point deduction of course just to get of G&H?.

Blair Mayne YNWA

{EDITOR'S NOTE: Give me 10 mins to think about that 1 mate}

It would not be right. Whether we like it or not, Moores allowed these two dipsh*ts to buy the club. We are stuck with them until someone (hopefully soon) buys us.

The club has to be sold correctly to the right buyer (if that exists) not through the back door to the bank.

We are a club that does things in the right way, and when Shanks took over, it took time, and so we must be patient and have faith.

Dirks Engine Room

We might not have any choice Dirks if it takes the banks to get rid of G&H then so be it.

Blair Mayne YNWA

()()

 

 

 

 

 

04 Sep 2010 22:47:56
Just found this what do you think ed? {ed's note - it makes little difference if true, the bank will just sell the club on anyway. They won't want to run the club.}

ED do you think it would be a good idea IF the banks did takeover without the 9 point deduction of course just to get of G&H?.

Blair Mayne YNWA

{EDITOR'S NOTE: Give me 10 mins to think about that 1 mate}

It would not be right. Whether we like it or not, Moores allowed these two dipsh*ts to buy the club. We are stuck with them until someone (hopefully soon) buys us.

The club has to be sold correctly to the right buyer (if that exists) not through the back door to the bank.

We are a club that does things in the right way, and when Shanks took over, it took time, and so we must be patient and have faith.

Dirks Engine Room

()()

 

 

 

 

 

04 Sep 2010 22:43:16
Roy was very impressed with garcia today and will bid for him in jan transfer window along with danny murphy. YNWA


Wow, do you people sit there all day thinking these things up, Firstly Danny Murphy is over 30 and is very happy at Fulham, Secondly Luis is a free agent as his contract was cancelled by mutual concent by his club. He's too old to play for us, but an amazing person.

()()

 

 

 

 

 

04 Sep 2010 22:14:25
Liverpool will avoid a nine-point penalty if they fall under bank ownership next month.

The Premier League will approve an Anfield takeover by the Royal Bank of Scotland if co-owners Tom Hicks and George Gillet don't find a buyer or repay their debt by October 6.

The RBS has had power to seize the club before but there were concerns about league sanctions. Fans feared that if the Americans defaulted on their loans the club would be plunged into administration, leading to a nine-point deduction.

And that would almost certainly end their hopes of qualifying for the Champions League with devastating consequences for the club.

But clarification that a bank takeover is within Premier League rules is of huge significance. It means the league recognises the distinction between the owners' debts and the club's debt.

The Americans face catastrophic financial losses in the region of £300m if they miss the October deadline.

Hicks and Gillett still owe their 'acquisition debt' - currently £282.4m - which they used to buy Liverpool in 2007 as part of the company they created called Kop Football.

But that company exists independently from profit-making Liverpool Football Club and Athletics Grounds Limited, whose accounts are sent to the Premier League.

If the bank takes over, the owners' existing debts will be wiped out but they would lose the club without receiving a penny.

An RBS takeover will enable the bank to deal directly with buyers from next month and sell the club for a reasonable price.

The Kop is now braced for one of the most important months in its history.

Hicks and Gillett desperately want more time from the bank, but Managing Director Christian Purslow, Commercial Director Ian Ayre and Chairman Martin Broughton have urged RBS to refuse another stay of execution.

The bank, club and Premier League still hope a last-minute takeover will prevent the need for bank intervention.

RBS wanted the club sold by last Tuesday and imposed strict penalties on Hicks and Gillett to force a sale. A final charge of £7.5m was made on August 31, after earlier penalties of £5m on July 15 and £7.5m on August 15.

But there is no immediate incentive for buyers now the transfer window has shut and the refinance deadline looms.

A few months ago Hicks' boldly valued Liverpool 'between £600m-£800m', though sources close to the owners dispute any such valuation.

The owners tried to refinance in June using the club's assets but were blocked by the rest of the board. Securing new loans against their US assets is another avenue they're pursuing.

But if Hicks and Gillett are unable to raise funds, they're faced with a startling choice. They could accept a minimal profit if a bid materialises or lose the club for nothing.

But a source close to the sale process warned: "This is a little like one of those horror movies. Just when you think the monster has been killed in the final scene, he somehow gets back up again."

just found this what do you think ed? {ed's note - it makes little difference if true, the bank will just sell the club on anyway. They won't want to run the club.}

()()

 

 

 

 

 

04 Sep 2010 21:59:21
Roy looking to get honda. reason y, , gerard going to partner raul at CM, n torres will be lone striker, ,
lf j. cole on the left then right wing kuyt(or most probably will be sell in jan and replaced by arda turan or ruiz) honda will operate from the center of the borh wings. gerard will provide long accurate crosses. honda can blast from any angle and could operate dramatically with torres. he will be bought for 12 with adds on 2 to 3 mil depending on performance.he is bought to replace aqua. leaving option for back up striker, most probably babel will took on control with pacheco and ngog also proven. as for liverpools lb taiwo may come as a free agent, it's may. sunil gabroo.

formation 4-2-3-1
reina
johnson carragher agger konchenky/ taiwo?
raul m. gerard
turan honda j.cole/ babel
torres

()()

 

 

 

 

 

04 Sep 2010 19:00:03
Announcement over the coming days that Liverpool FC are not happy with the bids on the table. The sale process will continue however in the meantime a refinance package has been agreed Therefore LFC will not be sold before December. With the current finance markets the new government have ensure that the UK will once gain enter recession and buying a football right now is a good idea. Hicks and Gillett will stay for the time being.

()()

 

 

 

 

 

04 Sep 2010 17:47:20
Strong rumours circulating that Liverpool are talking to Gai Assulan about the possibility of joining the club.

()()

 

 

 

 

 

04 Sep 2010 13:21:42
Lfc to sign messy 300mill plus 50 add on

()()

 

 

 

 

 

04 Sep 2010 09:20:57
Roy def interested in bringing in jenas in jan, he asked about kranjcar but he was adamant he did not want to move and is happy to rotate, but jenas would consider if he does not feature at white hart lane?

()()

 

 

 

 

 

04 Sep 2010 00:36:55
04 Sep 2010 00:18:06
Round robben it does not matter if your scouse or not if your a lfc fan you do not read the sun out of respect for our fans who died on that sad day Not all of them were scouse. They should make it a law DONT READ THE SUN!

Big red john j4t96

I'm not from Liverpool but i like to think i'm part scouse as are Great Club is a family not a franchise i.e MAN'URE. I also despise the S*N and the Anti Christ that is Rupert Murdoch who should f*ck off back to hell and sit on his throne.

Blair Mayne YNWA

()()

 

 

 

 

 

04 Sep 2010 00:27:23
Just seen Torres's two goals against Liechtenstein 2 great strikes and no injury's all in all a good night.

Now you can sleep easy Roy and pray he stays fit.

Blair Mayne YNWA

()()

 

 

 

 

 

04 Sep 2010 00:18:06
Round robben it does not matter if your scouse or not if your a lfc fan you do not read the sun out of respect for our fans who died on that sad day Not all of them were scouse. They should make it a law DONT READ THE SUN!

Big red john j4t96

()()