Liverpool Rumours Archive July 21 2016

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

21 Jul 2016 12:57:06
Eds can you say if its true that anderson telisca agent is in london to have talks with liverpool just read it

Cheers.

Believable1 Unbelievable10

{Ed002's Note - I can tell you that both his agent and a third party that assists are elsewhere right now. Talisca is however in England with Benfica and all of the club staff.}

21 Jul 2016 18:04:27
Not Liverpool related but I've heard that Wolves FC are interested in him?

Agree3 Disagree13

21 Jul 2016 10:32:36
Eds have you heard anything about Liverpool interested in Jonny, think he plays for Celta Vigo, oh it's not from Twitter but one of the national newspapers, although their just as bad.

Believable6 Unbelievable3

{Ed002's Note - Celta Vigo's Jonny Castro was one of the options looked at by Barcelona at the end of the season but the player was not interested in moving to simply provide cover.}

21 Jul 2016 11:12:01
Thanks Ed.

Agree2 Disagree0

21 Jul 2016 07:53:33
25 million bid accepted by Newcastle for wijnaldum, medical expected today.

Believable24 Unbelievable12

21 Jul 2016 10:17:57
Good. Now let's get behind him.

The fee is not his fault. And it is also not his fault that other options do not want to come to us without Champions League.

How he played in the second half of last season means nothing to me. It's the future that matters.

Welcome to LFC.

Agree46 Disagree15

21 Jul 2016 10:45:29
I support him and wish all of the best. My only concern is that we should be reducing the squad size, as ed 001 states. Our team still seems a bit bloated.

Agree21 Disagree5

21 Jul 2016 10:46:50
Id just like to say that I'm currently working with a gang of geordies 3 of which are season ticket holders. Non had a bad word to say about him, very good player who they all think will thrive at Liverpool. As for second Hal of season they didn't blame him at all. They said there were players a lot worse than him, with janmaat takin a lot of the stick.

Agree11 Disagree9

21 Jul 2016 10:45:29
I support him and wish all of the best. My only concern is that we should be reducing the squad size, as ed 001 states. Our team still seems a bit bloated.

Agree3 Disagree2

21 Jul 2016 10:46:50
Id just like to say that I'm currently working with a gang of geordies 3 of which are season ticket holders. Non had a bad word to say about him, very good player who they all think will thrive at Liverpool. As for second Hal of season they didn't blame him at all. They said there were players a lot worse than him, with janmaat takin a lot of the stick.

Agree3 Disagree4

21 Jul 2016 11:30:39
Stoked with this. His "style" is perfect for klopp. Direct, creative, quick, eye for goal. Its great. Watching highlights of 2015-16 season it us amazing how bland we look without cout, firmino on the field or on form. Now, with mane and wijnaldum we are adding players who will be compliment thpse two in attack percectly. Well maybe exaggerating perfect! But looks good to me.

Agree14 Disagree4

21 Jul 2016 13:28:09
Exactly, he looks good on highlight reels which is the laziest way of judging how good a player is. It`s like watching glorified youtube clips and then saying a player is awesome. I personally watched him play at the WC and at Newcastle and for me, he`s not what we need and is a luxury signing just like Lallana and Milner. What happens to Branagan and Grujic? I guess no one is talking about that as many just wanna see signings made without thinking of their impact on the squad and youth. I am open to be proven wrong on this as it means he contributed to our achievements next season which is all I care about. But if I`m right, then it will be another disaster like the ones we already know of. No need mentioning names as it`s just too painful.

Agree4 Disagree14

21 Jul 2016 14:50:40
Sure, judging a player from YouTube clips is lazy. But judging a player based on a 2 year old World Cup and his performance for a relegated club is lazy as well. By the way, in case you didn't look up any facts, Wijnaldum scored 11 goals in the PL last season for an abysmal Newcastle side. Which is more than any current LFC player scored last season in the league.

So let's just pump the breaks and see what the man does for us, huh?

Agree9 Disagree4

21 Jul 2016 18:00:46
I am going to say that I am 100% sure that GW is not competing for the same position as Branigan and Grujic. so don't worry about that. He will be competing for a spot as the attacking 3 with Couts, Fimino, Mane, Lallana, etc etc.

Agree6 Disagree1

21 Jul 2016 18:32:58
RedRum, your post has so many holes in it, it`s not eben funny. I watched all Holland`s games at the WC LIVE and not two year after and not highlights as I am a fan of the Dutch since the great Marco Van Basten. I also watched his games at Newcastle, NOT MOTD highlight reels so again your post makes no sense. You say he scored 11 goals but fail to admit that he score 6 of them in two games (4 vs Norwich and 2 vs Spurs on the last day of the season) . Another fact you "conveniently" failed to say in your post. Where was he for the other 30 odd games? I know. He was strolling around, being lazy. So lazy he got dropped by Rafa because he wasn`t working hard enough or is Rafa now a joke manager open to your baseless criticizms? If Klopp wants him, fine. But to say I or many others shouldn`t voice our opinions on such a IMO, pointless signing as we have too many at his position, will not be tolerated. I hope I`m wrong but like my gut told me about Benteke, this will end up in tears. I hope not but we shall see.

Agree4 Disagree6

21 Jul 2016 18:32:58
RedRum, your post has so many holes in it, it`s not eben funny. I watched all Holland`s games at the WC LIVE and not two year after and not highlights as I am a fan of the Dutch since the great Marco Van Basten. I also watched his games at Newcastle, NOT MOTD highlight reels so again your post makes no sense. You say he scored 11 goals but fail to admit that he score 6 of them in two games (4 vs Norwich and 2 vs Spurs on the last day of the season) . Another fact you "conveniently" failed to say in your post. Where was he for the other 30 odd games? I know. He was strolling around, being lazy. So lazy he got dropped by Rafa because he wasn`t working hard enough or is Rafa now a joke manager open to your baseless criticizms? If Klopp wants him, fine. But to say I or many others shouldn`t voice our opinions on such a IMO, pointless signing as we have too many at his position, will not be tolerated. I hope I`m wrong but like my gut told me about Benteke, this will end up in tears. I hope not but we shall see.

Agree3 Disagree4

21 Jul 2016 19:07:51
I don't care if you watched the World Cup games live. I don't care if you think Marco Van Basten is relevant to this topic. The point is that the World Cup was 2 years ago. His performances at that time are no longer relevant. Funny that you use the word "baseless. "

All I'm saying is that there's no reason to judge the man without having even made an appearance for the club yet.

Also, reread my previous post. Because you seem to think I said some things that I didn't say. And have a beer. My god.

Agree7 Disagree3

21 Jul 2016 20:51:15
Firstly hello mighty eds and thank you all for the time and effort you put into making us feel closer to the club, its god send really, especially for die hard fans thank you so much, my appreciation can not be measured. I want to say I'm very intrigued by klopps buys in a good way, he didn't seem one to buy stars at Dortmund more to make them of course I could be wrong but he assisted players to Become to become so much better and as for the fee, I think a certain legend made sure that since we paid 35m for Carroll anyone cheaper than that should be given a chance, I'm just saying, I'm fully behind klopp and what ever further plans he has Ill leave the media and rival fans to berate us, c'mon you reds! And I'll be changing my username ASAP.

Agree3 Disagree1

21 Jul 2016 21:06:46
Again, not reading my post. I said I watched both the WC and his games at New castle. You again, omitted this part of my post and keep harping on the World Cup part of it. Of course, you don`t care about what happened two years ago, neither do I. His perfs in Brazil are not relevant but his Newcastle performances of last season are, something you seem to conveniently fail to address in any of your posts. I`m judging him based on his record because that is what we can all go by. of course I`ll give him a chance as he`s not a bad player, just one we don`t need and IMO, isn`t better than those already at the club. What other choice do I have? Have a nice beer, by the way.

Agree3 Disagree3

22 Jul 2016 06:53:14
Oh Cincy at least the inarticulate nature and misunderstandings in your posts offer entertaining reading to those requiring a little smile. Rum's point ultimately is "get behind your team, it's manager, and it's players and future players" - negativity before they even kick a ball for us is not a trait true fans would possess.

Agree7 Disagree0

22 Jul 2016 06:55:29
I just hope that's not the committee at work again.

Wondering if Eds know if Klopp held interest in him or tried to sign him while at Dortmund.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - no idea sorry.}

22 Jul 2016 13:15:17
Clearly Klop doesn't think high of the young defenders. He doesn't want Ilori and wisdom at all. Lucas is a midfielder, you may play him as a defender when there is a crisis but you shouldn't start a season considering him as a center back option. In modern football its difficult to play inexperienced center backs unless they are very talented, strikers continuously put pressure on defenders and in so many occasions goals are scored because of errors. I believe this is one position where the ability to read the game matters the most. when Gomes is fit he will get a chance if he is better. it's not like seniority is a criteria when he selects his line up.

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Jul 2016 07:16:13
I see the rumour for Jordan amavi has circulated again . Any truth to it eds?

Believable0 Unbelievable7

{Ed001's Note - we are still interested, yes. We are still trying to get a deal done. It seems we have bought a cheap defender merely to cover a gap, rather than trusting in youth players if we get injuries. That worries me.}

21 Jul 2016 07:32:47
To be fair ed1 we do seem to lack youngsters at centre back who could cover.

Agree3 Disagree5

{Ed001's Note - Gomez? Wisdom? Brewitt? And we had Ilori, Sakho, Matip, Lovren and Lucas, before we bought Klavan. I hope he is a success, but we really should be reducing squad size, not increasing it. This is following the worrying trend of recent years, building a squad, rather than a team. You then end up spreading the money too thinly and lack quality. I really expected better of Klopp. We got it right, all except for a left back, yet we are buying squad players due to injuries. That is not a good way to do business.}

21 Jul 2016 07:46:15
ed001 is there a chance that we brought in Klavan with a hope that he can help develop our youngsters in a mentor type role?

Agree1 Disagree2

{Ed001's Note - he is only 30, he should have 4-5 years left at the top level in him, if he is good enough. That is not a mentor role.}

21 Jul 2016 08:03:46
To be fair Gomez is injured and i personally don't rate wisdom or illori. Don't see wisdom as a CB and Klaven will be a good edition.

Agree6 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - injuries are not a reason to buy a player, unless they are career ending. He will recover from the injury and then we have one or the other that is then surplus.}

21 Jul 2016 08:11:42
Ed1 I have a question. About those players mentioned.

It was mentioned that Gómez may be moved because he wasn't good enough? Then he spoke with Kopp and was going to be given chance. Isn't he injured again anyhow?

Wisdom also meant to be moved on? And not good enough?

Brewitt, don't know much about.

Illori, also said to be not good enough, also meant to be sold?

Sakho's injured again, isn't he?

Matip and Lovren, are the only two senior CBs we have that are fit.

Lucas on his way out?

If some of the fringe players are moved on, or at least not good enough, and given the injuries - doesn't it make sense to have another established CB in place? Honestly don't know much about Klavan, and not sure if he was the best choice we could have made but it doesn't see like we are that flush with options - at least given injuries and doubts over those other players?

What is your opinions on those players?

Ta.

Agree2 Disagree2

{Ed001's Note - nobody said Gomez was leaving because he was not good enough, no idea where you got that from. He is injured, but that is not a career threatening one, he will back fit soon but with little chance of a game.

Wisdom is likely to be moved on, but I was only including him as an example of cover if we were desperate, rather than buying yet another player.

Ilori same as Wisdom, he is there if needed.

Sakho is injured but he will be back.

In fact this is a waste of a post as you are not understanding my point and wasting my time replying to something that is just miles away from what I am talking about.}

21 Jul 2016 08:15:57
Sorry Eds001's but you are just so negative, I watch him in the Bundesliga last year and he's a really good player, he can play left back and centre-back and is very suited to the Premier League.
All of the above I cannot say about Ilori.

Agree5 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - if you say so. It seems you fail to understand what I am talking about, so don't bother to criticise until you do.}

21 Jul 2016 08:21:23
Windows loads of time yet ED mi old buddy, anything could happen yet with regards to leavers, just a note is Lucas definitely on the out list? And also what's this wee rumour of Flanno out on loan, can't believe that surely?

Agree1 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - pretty much everyone is potentially on the out list. As for Flanno, the only possibility would be a short term loan to get his fitness and form back by playing regularly. He does not want to leave, so he would have to be forced out.}

21 Jul 2016 08:30:10
Perhaps Klopp doesn't think the youth players coming through have what it takes for his picture of Liverpool. In all honesty I find the Klavan and Wijnaldum (once he goes through) buys odd. but as always we simply can but sit and watch as the next chapter of LFC is played out.

Agree1 Disagree4

{Ed001's Note - it doesn't matter, they are only for cover. Then replace them next window or in the following summer, when the squad is pared down a bit and you have filled the yawning gap at left back.}

21 Jul 2016 08:53:45
I tend to agree with you ed001 except for the fact that players like wisdom and Illori shouldn't be happy to be squad players hoping for injuries for there chance. Better they move on for there own career.

Agree3 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - I have no problem with moving them on, though having them here as cover in the meantime is what we have. Until we offload them, we should make use of them and raise their value in the transfer market.}

21 Jul 2016 09:00:33
Ed001 i agree totally with you, I just hope Klopp proves us wrong. The GW has been acquired is a lazy piece if business. If GW, Klavan and a LB are our final purchases a massive clearout needs to happen all over the park. I think we need to reserve judgement until the end of the transfer window though.

Agree3 Disagree4

{Ed001's Note - I am not judging him, I am giving my opinion. I expect him to win things with us given time, but that does not mean he won't make mistakes along the way. Even Bob Paisley made mistakes and he is the best of all time.}

21 Jul 2016 09:26:43
Ed001, now that GW appears to be coming and with the assurances Grujic has of playing time due to his work permit, do you think that Coutinho's time is up and we are just waiting for a substantial and satisfactory bid? Thanks. Love the site mate, only real source of proper info about the club.

Agree1 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - I would think Lallana and Milner have just as much to worry about, if anything. They have effectively been replaced. Klopp will not force Couts to stay, so a reasonable offer that he wants to take will see him go.}

21 Jul 2016 09:32:24
What we lack in this day and age is perspective, every player signed every deal done has to work otherwise its doom and gloom. Judge was maybe too strong of a word. For every one Suarez there are ten Carrrol's. The way we acquire players though needs to get smarter so that one suarez will be 5 Carrol's instead of ten and correct me if i'm wrong but that is what's bugging you Ed001? cz that definitely bugs me. kp up the good work and keeping loving the club. YNWA.

Agree5 Disagree2

21 Jul 2016 09:31:15
I agree with you ed01. I expected Klopp to strip the fat this summer and to build a quality first 11.

This GW transfer seriously scares me.

Newcastle paid what, £14m? Why are we willing to pay a reported £24m for someone we haven't even monitored? What did he do last year to warrant a move to us? I know he scored a few goals but like much of his teamates he went missing.

We still need to strengthen left back. If we start the season with Moreno after his performances last year, as highlighted in the Europa League final, I will be seriously disappointed in our Jurgen!

I hope he knows what he's doing.

Cheers.

Agree5 Disagree7

21 Jul 2016 09:41:43
Cheers for the reply, i would happily allow either of those move on before Coutinho. I agree 100% with you regarding the Klavan transfer, we seem to be making the same mistakes by needlessly adding to the squad when we already have cover for CB. Can you shed some light on why Clyne is unhappy?

Agree0 Disagree3

{Ed001's Note - I don't really want to get into that mate. The important thing is that he is, but he is still at the club, so he has to make the best of things for now.}

21 Jul 2016 09:37:19
I really don't get the 'squad improvement'. I would have suspected we do have 4th choice players for a reason (or two) ; emergency backup (short-term injuries and suspensions) and being able to rest players against 'lesser teams'. I liked Klopp being explicit about 4 CBs and having Gomez as 4th. That sounded like a man with a plan. Buying 3rd-4th choice players contradicts this imho.

Agree2 Disagree1

{Ed002's Note - It contradicts what Klopp has said to Gomez - it seemed he lied - nothing else. It of course adds more Liverpool youngsters to the list of players who have little or no future at the club under Klopp as well.}

21 Jul 2016 10:59:00
I don't see Klavan as a completely terrible idea, it's not like signing with no plan at all, like Rodgers.
Once Wisdom, Ilori and Lucas are gone, we will have properly balanced options at the back.

RB, RB. RCB, RCB. Lovren. LCB, LCB. LB, LB.

Also, replacing Skrtel, Toure, Ilori and Wisdom with Matip and Klavan with no net spend and a wad off the wage bill seems to me like a summer of pretty good business in that department.

Agree9 Disagree2

21 Jul 2016 10:59:00
I don't see Klavan as a completely terrible idea, it's not like signing with no plan at all, like Rodgers.
Once Wisdom, Ilori and Lucas are gone, we will have properly balanced options at the back.

RB, RB. RCB, RCB. Lovren. LCB, LCB. LB, LB.

Also, replacing Skrtel, Toure, Ilori and Wisdom with Matip and Klavan with no net spend and a wad off the wage bill seems to me like a summer of pretty good business in that department.

Agree4 Disagree2

21 Jul 2016 11:20:19
You're making me worried Ed001! I feel as though if Allen, Lucas, Markovic, Milner and/ or Lallana left I'd be happier with the current business. Why is everyone up for sale ed? Seems another season of transition ahead. I feel a lot more confident this season but it seems like every year we make the same mistakes.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - because they are not the players Klopp wants.}

21 Jul 2016 11:31:00
Maybe Gomez was to be given a chance in pre season to get his fitness back up and for Klopp to have a look at him after being out for so long (didn't he get injured just just as Klopp arrived) . Now that isn't going to happen I think he might be sent on loan to get back on track and cover has arrived to allow this to happen.

Agree5 Disagree0

21 Jul 2016 11:33:23
I thought itd take minimum 3 rabsfer windows ro get the squad close to what klopp wants.

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Jul 2016 11:54:38
Could it be that Klopp will use Gomez at right or left back which is why he signed Klavan?

With Ilori and Wisdom likely to leave and Flanno going on loan maybe Gomez is seen as cover for both flanks.

Appreciate that it goes against what Klopp has previously said, maybe Square Tomato knows if Klopp has spoken to Gomez again.

Agree2 Disagree0

21 Jul 2016 12:32:55
Ed001 - I can see what you're saying re. CB, squad size and the young lads already at the club, including Gomez, but I honestly think Klopp felt we needed another left sided/ left footed centre-back. It seemed to be shaping up to be Matip/ Gomez for RCB and Sakho/ Lovren for LCB. now Klavan adds a more like for like replacement for Sakho, keeping the balance provided by the left footed player there. With Moreno starting so high up the pitch, it's easy for the opposition to 'block' the passing lane when there is a right footed player there and force the play back down the right.

Agree1 Disagree0

21 Jul 2016 12:33:34
I'm guessing I'm the only one that thinks Wisdom should have been given a chance at CB then?

Agree4 Disagree0

21 Jul 2016 13:16:53
Id rather have a squad capable of being up to the required standard to win all 38 league games, than playing a youngster who is not good enough to increase his market value. Ilori and wisdom struggled to get into relegated sides and that's why they're still at the club, because no one wants them unless unless they're next to nothing in transfer fee.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - Ilori was not on loan to struggle and Wisdom struggled due to injury, not because he couldn't get a place.}

21 Jul 2016 13:36:50
Ed1, Gomez has had repeating injuries for 2 seasons now and is high risk. Matip is injured too, we're relying on Lucas in defence which isn't good as he's not a defender and as bad as Skrtel at pulling players down and costing us free kicks in dangerous areas due to his lack of speed. Wisdom got skinned the other day by a Championship side and isn't good enough, neither is Ilori from the look of things. None of these players were purchased by Klopp who has shrewdly brought in Matip, Mane and Grujic and will continue to bring in good coachable players. Allen looks to be getting upgraded. So what if we buy a 30 year old to replace a 35 year old. He's good for a few seasons and was Augsburg's best player. Not a mistake, just Klopp doesn't like his options in youth or first team with injuries. As for Cout, I'm not a massive fan of his either, he's done very little to help win us games and as our creative outlet Mane looks a much better prospect at unlocking defenses.

Agree3 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - Lucas was excellent in defence when he played there, no idea what you are talking about comparing him to Skrtel. Complete nonsense.}

21 Jul 2016 13:45:27
Ed001 nailed it, just like I've been saying, Klavan could well be good but was he really required. Gomez and Sakho are due to miss a month of prem action, if that. So to all those saying great business, what happens when all 5 are fit and we have a game a week? Where do you see Gomez career progressing?

This £4m plus all fees and wages involved, was that not better spent towards this LB we desperately need?

Agree0 Disagree6

21 Jul 2016 14:14:51
Ed is right on the money. Klopp has come in and done a done a more than decent job. However it seems the bug of adding players to a squad for no reason, has hit him too. See the Caulker signing and the pursuit of Shane Long and you will see how much neither made sense at the time. We are doing the same thing again. This idea of buying players to replace fringe or injured players or players who we think will leave is just stupid and lacks strategic reflection. Gomez for me, would have needed time to get fit again and his setback clearly did not help and we all know Sakho and Lovren can`t stay fit thru out the season as we saw last season, hence the Klavan signing. Clearly he doesn`t rate Wisdom nor Ilori so, no prob there. It is the GW signing that is doing my head in. What happens to Grujic and Branagan or Lallana and Milner? I would sell the latter two but it still doesn`t explain why Wijnaldum is here. Also, he plays on the left, same place where Couts who`s ten times better, plays. IMO, Couts isn`t going anywhere so we now have GW here. For what? He`s not better than Lallana or Firmino or Mane so again, what is the purpose of him coming in? Replace Coutinho? That`s a sick joke as he is not even good enough to tie his shoe laces and we already have Firmino who can play Couts role if he left. LB needs to be addressed and neither Moreno nor Klavan are the answer here. We are the prototypical definition of insanity right now with no end in sight.

Agree1 Disagree5

21 Jul 2016 14:25:37
I understand they're not the players he wants but I'm hard pushed to think of better players we could sign than firmino and coutinho in their positions given our 8th place finish and lack of champions league football. With no one knowing who's coming or going that can't be good for the mentality of the squad? You could have a stormer of a preseason and start to the season but you're all off if the right price comes in?

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Jul 2016 14:35:13
Hi Eds - reading that Flanno has not travelled due to the loan offer from Burnley.

So would that then mean we have Gomez as back up across the back line rather than specifically at CB.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - See above.}

21 Jul 2016 14:40:04
Bringing Klavan in makes perfect sense. We have lost 2 centre halves this summer and brought 2 in. Ilori and Wisdom are no where near good enough. Added to which Ilori's fee is based on the number of games he plays so the club are reluctant to play him, especially as he is way short of what we need. Playing young and inexperienced players at centre half is a way to the poor house. Klavan's signing makes perfect sense :)

Agree5 Disagree0

21 Jul 2016 17:50:01
Thought ilori was at Villa first half of season and didn't play a game. Wisdom was injured a lot but not sure all his missed appearances were injury related.

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Jul 2016 17:57:10
We need to give youth a chance. I was at the Huddersfield game last night and must say that Wisdom looked very comfortable at centre back. I know it is only one game, but it seems a shame that he will not get a chance to show his capability.

Kevin Stewart was also excellent last night, and last season seemed to be making a push for a position in the starting 11, however I do not see how he is going to achieve his potential without game time.

Agree0 Disagree2

21 Jul 2016 19:04:36
Brewitt needs to play for the U23s regularly before he can be tested in the first team. Currently, he is not even close IMO. Physical player though.

Agree1 Disagree0

21 Jul 2016 18:42:23
Ed001, should we not look at the prospect that Gomez will be used as cover, if not potential starter, at left back? I know he is seen as a centre half, but Carra was, and he first got regular game time at full back. This, In my opinion, gives him a lot more than 'little or no chance of a future at the club'.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - he struggled there before, why put him back there? We had enough of that square pegs crap with Rodgers.}

21 Jul 2016 21:49:58
Ed001 seems to completely miss the point regarding CBs. You seem to forget the CB crisis we had last season. Without Klavan and Matip we would have only Sakho and Lovren as our good trusted CB pairing. If one or both gets injured we wouldn't have adequate cover. Players like Ilori, Wisdom, and Lucas aren't going to get us anywhere near challenging for top 4. Simply, they are trash who wouldn't even get a place on bench at other clubs challenging for top 4. You really shouldn't criticize others either if you have no clue about what you are talking about. Really worries me when I see genuine liverpool fans who have accepted mediocrity.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - so what? That is why you check injury histories and have medicals before you buy players. Leicester had so few injuries for good reason last season, despite having the hardest training routine of all teams in the league. We should be using the same methods, instead of buying more injured players. As for the 'CB crisis', that is what a manager is for, to manage things like that, with the resources at his disposal. Not bring in 45 players in case there is another one. We can't have 8 players for every position in case there is an injury.}

 
Change Consent