Liverpool Rumours Archive January 14 2016

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

14 Jan 2016 21:41:06
New podcast is up Benny Baller and Ed001 discuss the Liverpool v Arsenal match with special guest, Harry Scouser


Podcast 12

Believable5 Unbelievable1

14 Jan 2016 07:51:27
News coming out this morning that Klopp wants Markovic back in January and his loan spell at Fenerbache may be cancelled.

Believable13 Unbelievable24

14 Jan 2016 13:12:47
Hope that's true mate. Sending 20m players on loan like Aquilani, Carrol, Balotelli, now Markovic just shows how bloody wasteful LFC is. At least Klopp is trying to salvage what we got and then spend smartly in the summer.

Agree24 Disagree1

14 Jan 2016 13:38:51
I guess fenerbache would still be interested in the summer even if he came back, maybe as part of the recall agreement there could be a first option clause? Is that possible eds?

Agree1 Disagree10

{Ed002's Note - No - he is on loan for the season. I have explained the situation.}

14 Jan 2016 16:28:16
So I used the search funtion, and I glean Markovic wants to make a permanent move at the end of the season - it's suggested he would wish to stay with Fenerbache. in order to resurrect his career. Is Turkey really the place to resurrect a career - I thought it was where players went in the twilight of their playing days?

Just thinking of the caveats that I couldn't pick up from previous posts using the search.

If the loan cannot be cancelled now, can the club recall him in the summer? If not, presumably his only option would be to stay with Fenerbache on a permanent deal? That is, he cannot opt for a move to another club?

I would have thought he has to agree to whatever outcome in order for it to happen, ie agree to return or agree to sign for Fenerbache? Are these basically his only options?

Apologies to both Eds if I've missed something but is this the sum total of it?

Agree0 Disagree12

{Ed002's Note - I think you have completely misunderstood what a one year loan means Rob.}

14 Jan 2016 20:18:55
Ed, I don't think we don't understand the term one year loan part, it's the option of a recall part. Ward was on a one year loan right? I know I'm going to get torn a new one here, but we don't know the specifications of the loan agreement, not the duration. Obvisouly I get now there was no recall option, or without financial implements.

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - They vary. Liverpool paid to get Ilori out of his loan. Unless the other side and the player agree it won't happen with Markovic. They don't want to let go and he does not want to leave.}

15 Jan 2016 00:53:06
Okay Ed, you got me.

Anyway, what Fencey said. so rather than "recalling the player", let's say "at the end of the year long loan" what are his options?

Does Markovic think his career is best going to be progressed in Turkey? Surely he can't believe that staying in Turkey for more than perhaps a few seasons is the answer?

Ta for any insight.



Rob.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - At the end of the loan he returns to Liverpool and his options are exactly the same as the other players. Staying in Turkey may well be attractive to him - they are treating him well and he is playing.}

15 Jan 2016 08:15:40
i think the keypoint from ed002 is he himself does not want to leave. ilori wouldev said yes to coming back as he's not even playing there.

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent