Liverpool Banter Archive August 09 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

09 Aug 2014 23:09:33
"You will struggle to find a CL proven forward with a measurable goal return anything close to that for less than £20m though"
--------------------------------

Huntelaar?

Believable7 Unbelievable16

We found one in Remy but pulled out.

Agree2 Disagree3

I said struggle, not impossible. The problem with the two you've just mentioned is that Huntelaar is not what I'd consider a forward. He is an out and out striker. The same sort of applies to Remy because although he can play right wing, he is useless there! Also, when was the last time Remy even played a CL game? 3 or 4 years ago?

So yeah I see your point. They are two players with good goal returns who've played in strong European leagues and the CL, but neither suits us as well as Lavezzi in my opinion. The fact we've shown an interest in both suggests that Rodgers does want an experienced attacker of some kind for a relatively low fee. The other options are of course Bony, who I think would make the step up to CL or Konoplyanka whom I think would eventually make the step up to the premier league.

Huntelaar, Lavezzi, Bony or Konoplyanka. I don't see the fans problems with any of these players. They are alll experienced forwards with at least 3 years left at the top of their game and none of them will cost mega bucks. I want Bony primarily. If he is out of our reach though, I'd take Lavezzi in a heart beat. We don't need to play with two strikers next season. 4-3-3 is a far more balanced formation!

Agree1 Disagree13

Wouldn't have him, but Hernandez also fits that

Agree1 Disagree0

First of all i'm not advocating Huntelaar for one second. Yet I do think we need an out and out goal scorer. I think we have enough "forwards" of the other variety. We need someone who can stick the ball in the net and not another 10/13 goal a season player. That is why we went after Remy and have interest in Bony.

Agree1 Disagree0

Roberto Firmino would be my first choice with Lavezzi as a back up option.
Either would be perfect for what we need at the moment.

Agree1 Disagree0

Irish rover correct mate

Agree0 Disagree0

Spot on EMS.

Agree0 Disagree1

10 Aug 2014 15:03:56
Sorry EMS but you can't discount the two suggestions because you see them as ''Strikers' not 'Forwards'

Sturridge was a forward, Markovic is a forward and Chelsea passed him up at €7.50 million,

Strikers and forwards is subjective IMO!

Agree0 Disagree0

Huntelaar is so one paced he almost moves backwards he's so slow, has struggled at the top level(Madrid and Milan), has a poor first touch, He doesn't contribute to the team when not in possession or even in possession as a goal hanger is a fair description of what he does. He will be on stupid wages too. Don't see any benefits to us signing him, unless anyone is seeing something I'm missing? He'll retire to Turkey or the mancs Dutch old mans home.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 23:02:16
Anyone know when Flanno is due back playing?

Believable0 Unbelievable1

09 Aug 2014 22:31:38
I would like to pick a lot of posters up on the theory that top 4 isn't good enough for a team that finished 2nd last season and have spent heavily this summer. Surely a top 4 finish is not stating that we are giving up on challenging for the title, because if we win the league we would have finished in a top 4 place. All that we are saying is the importance of staying in the top 4, Which gives us a Champions League place, more revenue, that entitles us to compete for the better players. I believe we will challenge for the title again this season, but by saying I would be happy to stay in a champions league place and have a latter stage run in the champions league is being defeatist, is silly really. You should not expect anything in this world, because we all need a bit of luck to be a champion. And every club will be trying their best to reach their own goals. Competing for a top 4 place, includes trying to win it. Come on you reds

Believable8 Unbelievable1

Facts are 6 into 4 don't go. fickle heads 4get 3 yr ago

Agree2 Disagree1

Good post mate.

I think a good season would be to establish top 4 again and to get to the last 16 stage of the champions league. Although, depending on how well the team gels and what other signings we make could make us title contenders.

I think top 4 again and a good run in champions league would give us a great platform for seasons after. To challenge every season.

Agree5 Disagree0

Great post jimmy
Its.nice to see intelligence when it comes to football on this page.
Agger I agree mate, you always need a platform

Agree2 Disagree0

Totally agree, OP. I think we'll struggle to achieve second again and top 4 should be the realistic target again although of course everyone should still try for the title.

I think we over-achieved a little last year and will still be close this year but there are less circumstances in our favour this year. Last year Man U lost Fergie, Mourinho hadn't established his own team, no Europe, no Aguero. It all helped us a great deal.

I still think we'll be a major contender but I honestly think it'll be a couple of years more until we are true title contenders year in, year out. The club has bought players who will hopefully fulfil their potential in the next 1-3 years, that tells us something.

Agree1 Disagree0

10 Aug 2014 11:38:48
Not 100% sure, but I think the revenues for top 4 finish are doubling this season due to the new tv rights deal kicking in. Finishing top 4 is vital just to keep up financially.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 22:16:41
Hello eds is it ture we are trying to get a big money signing to replace suarez

Believable1 Unbelievable3

{Ed002's Note - Read the posts Lee.}

09 Aug 2014 21:52:19
Can I ask everyones.opinions even ems on.pundits arsenal to win the title and us out of the top 4. We have better.forward players and defenders. Hopefully our LB will be sorted soon. They edge us in midfield, they have more.depth in that area IMO and.ramsay.is very.important for them. Sanchez is top class I will say that.However if we sign a top striker, we are title favorites without no doubht in my mind. Let them.write us off ;)

Believable13 Unbelievable2

09 Aug 2014 22:29:53
Arsenal have done really well this summer and are seriously looking for a DM and CB, that would complete their squad.
Their attacking fronts currently are very strong. We could also see a strong rise in Ozil and Ramsy.
The most important difference, They haven't sold any of their star player and have a settled team.

A LB and Striker would put us pretty high up in the list. And we should shed the mentality of top 4 finish and look for the title instead

Agree4 Disagree2

For me it is still Man City and Chelsea, not Arsenal and (I hope) not ManU. Chelsea and Man City are stronger defensively and have two managers which I think are stronger than the current Wenger. Re us, without Suzrez we are a bit like Argentina without Messi in the last World Cup or without Maradona in 1986. Suarez was huge for us last year in so many ways including but not only his 31 league goasl and 7-8 assists. Compare that with one of our top targets Lavezi who scored 3 goals and 7 assists the season before last and 9 goals and 4 assists last season for PSG. And I think the PL is harder to dominate. And we have CL which will mean two games a week on some weeks to all our big names. And most of our defenders and midfield and strikers will have to play both because our subsitutues are not good enough. Terry, Cahil, Ivanovich and this new Phiplipe Luiz guy or Zabaleta, Kompany, Mangala, Clichi and all the other defenders from Man City are way better than our defence. But maybe everyone are wrong and BR will do miracles again. Thankfully we have to wait only one more week to start and find out. I will be very happy with top 4 though worth reminding that 4th spot still have to overcome a tough playoff game as Arsenal will need in the coming weeks - and this is not a given that you overcome it, as the Everton supporters remember very well.

Agree3 Disagree4

I think the league will be very close in the 1-6 spots, therefore it's really hard to predict where will we finish. I wouldn't be surprised to see us finish 1st and I equally wouldn't be surprised to see us finish 5th. It's a tough league with lots of competition for the top 4 and it'll be fine margins (something like 4-6 points I think) between 3rd and 6th.

Agree4 Disagree1

Chelsea will (unfortunately) win the league this yr. Man city will get 2nd the rest is a scramble between us n arsenal for top 4 spot. I was very interested to read another posters striker profile for all challenging clubs which does evidence our dificiencies. Really hope we can get top 4 again, rest will b a bonus

Agree2 Disagree3

I don't think Chelsea will win the league, infact I see them as the team fighting it out for 4th/5th. I know JM has spent big (again) but I don't think he is the manager he once was.

Agree4 Disagree0

10 Aug 2014 07:32:27
Small factors will be crucial this season.

As for the "Pundits", these were the same guys who said we wouldn't be finishing Top 4 last season too.

Agree3 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 21:12:26
Ems
Wasnt it Stats thãt bought us.players such as Adam and downing?
We have moved on from them days kid.Lavezzi is a very good footballer.
Is he a goalscorer that will bang in 20 goals a season? No. Is hr worth 20million? No
But will I support him if he comes? Yes
The real debate is ems is there.is very few top strikers that are versatile available.
Ive been easy with my reply this time, maybe we can share views some day ;)

Believable21 Unbelievable5

Don't call me kid please. Comolli bought us Downing and Adam. Not stats. I'm not saying stats are the be all and end all though am I. I'm just saying that the stats you persist with posting are wrong. I laugh at the fact 4 prople have currently disagreed with my post (well, apparently 4, but you're probably behind at least 2-3 of them) because you simply cannot disagree with facts. Lavezzi has 23 goals and 14 assists in the last two years. You can't disagree with that because it is a fact not an opinion.

Lavezzi is a link up forward who createsand scores goals. I would argue that being directly involved in 37 goals in 2 years does justify a £20m price tag, irrespective of 29, which let's be honest, is not excessively old! If you disagree, that is fine. You will struggle to find a CL proven forward with a measurable goal return anything close to that for less than £20m though. You seem to be judging him as if he's a striker. You simply cannot judge a player who picks the ball up in his own half, drives forward and creates attacks, and then occasionally finds himself involved in the finishing move for the goal, on his goalscoring alone.

I agreed with your last post regarding Bony. He is younger, cheaper and a very good player. I simply disagreed with your anti-Lavezzi propaganda.

Hopefully we will agree one day, for now though, have a nice evening.

Agree7 Disagree18

Yes I agree EMS. Bony or Lavezzi would do for me. Finalise the Moreno deal and things all of a sudden look good. However, I just can't see the owners running with a £20 mill plus striker given what we've spent to date. Did we need both markovic and Lallana?

Agree3 Disagree11

EMS, let's not try and alter history, King Kenny brought us those players.

Agree7 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - Downing was Commolli's choice, Adam was Dalglish's.}

Edd001 he did agree.to them.though mate. He is his own.man. Has it changedy opinion of a true great human.being? No. Dalglish will always be a legend

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - if you say so. It is not about what he would agree to when it comes to Liverpool. He was brought in with the understanding that he would be working with signings chosen for him. Yes he did choose some, but some he didn't. Would he possibly have chosen those same players being given the option? Who knows. He certainly wasn't the best at signing players, he signed some shocking ones first time round, after losing the advice of Sir Bob that he had guiding him early on.}

Edd001, I did not know that mate. I believed all this time that.camolli would suggest him with potential signings and he had the final word, that they worked as a team but it.came down to.KK. To be fair he could have brought in anyone and u would have.gone with it and trusted him

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - later it changed to the power going to Dalglish, but initially he was in a similar position to the ludicrous one at the club now. Rodgers is not picking all the players and so we are bringing in ones that we don't really need, while areas that need addressing are being left. This committee needs disbanding immediately, it is idiotic and FSG are making a huge mistake employing it. Decisions need to have one person making them, not a group, a benevolent dictatorship will get things done well, a committee just talks about a good game while getting nothing important sorted. I would like to point out that I am not convinced Rodgers is the right man to pick the players either.}

Edd001 this is eye opening for me, I assumed Rodgers chose all the players. Yes I agree with the Rodgers statement. Though we have.brought in quailty players( majority), we havnt yet addressed what ee really needed and are leaving ourselves with limited time.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - not all mate, not even close.}

Great insight edd001, hopefully the transfer committee does change. Flaws to it IMO. Il buy you a few pints some day edd when.im back in pool ;)

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - would have to be pints of water or pots of tea for me mate!}

09 Aug 2014 21:01:43
What happened to the earlier thread Ed, did it start to detract from a Mills and Boom theme?

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - It just became a stream of abuse toward you - I don't care to read that stuff.}

Ok Ed. Shame really, they clearly don't engage in post match pub banter. There's plenty of negatives like me about. I'll only be happy when we win the league. Until we do I'll carry on supporting the team on a Saturday afternoon but keep picking what I consider to be flaws.

Agree3 Disagree7

Tbh its a bit bad ozone can't post without been abused I rarely agree with him but don't feel the need to abuse him if people don't like what he says hit disagree and move on or ignore his post he is a lfc fan and were all entitled to our opinions agree or disagree no 1 should be abused we all want what's best for the club at the end of the day

Agree4 Disagree2

I can't type that i'm surprised really, football is kinda tribal for some fans.
Let's just be honest here, Ozone typed ''Everton have a better team than us [Liverpool].'' He also claimed he was going to put a bet on Everton finishing above Liverpool. He did all this on a Liverpool banter/comment website. Now, i'm sure if you typed a similar scenario on another extremely well supported club's fan website you'd see a similar reaction followed by the increasingly vague and nebulous use of the word ''abuse'' arise to describe the no doubt odious reaction.

Ozone was trolling hard and he obviously caused some delicate soul's equilibrium to become unbalanced. He's stirring a pot, trying to be funny ''Mills and Boon''. I'd personally take it as a compliment, which I think Ozone does, at a guess. It is a shame, but it's going to happen in the tinder box environment. Some people get their jollies off by annoying, upsetting, causing unrest and so on.

Many people have raised concerns about the lack of this or missing that, not being totally convinced here or think we may get exposed there and so on, it's the way in which it's delivered to the collective is what causes the outrage for some. I am, like many others used to his soothsaying misery as much as I cringe at his black cloud scribbling's, I guess some other/s just don't quite get our dear old Ozone or his bucket of buzz kill.

I liken him to the non-fan (Paco) in the Waterboy played by Clint Howard, who boo's his own team, slates the players and who is disliked by near all his fellow supporters for being a killjoy. Ozone has long since become an adjective around these parts.

Agree2 Disagree0

Honesty' same good think Ollieston but clearly not profitable to its possessor around these parts. I've never been into dressing things up for the sake of it. Say it how you see it and if folk don't like it that's their look out. I have many friends who consider Everton to have a better first 11 than us man to man, especially now Suarez has gone.

The thing is, if we didn't get a cross section of opinion on here to stimulate a debate you would end up with unrealistic mills and boom drivel.

Not far off the mark with the character analysis there ollieston but I never boo the lads at the game, in fact I never criticise at the game. At the game, I want Anfield as loud and positive as we can get it. I save the critique for after in the pubs and on forums such as this.

Agree1 Disagree0

Should read 'Honesty's a good thing'. Predictive text!

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 19:56:03
We will get in a striker, some need to stop worrying. I would take bony over lavezzi all that long. Far younger, proven in the PL and knows where the net is. I would be disappointrd if we forked out 20million on a 29/30 year old who has scored 12 goals from 2012 to now. Everyone has their own preferences. But we all have to look at this window and look at top strikers available and likely. There is evidently very little

Believable22 Unbelievable3

09 Aug 2014 20:33:06
I agree, Bony is proven and knows where the net is. He would really make a big difference.
But what worrying is, We haven't contacted Swansea. And haven't made any progress in the transfer.
I think we have dropped our interest from the player.

Agree11 Disagree1

09 Aug 2014 20:50:04
Look mate, whilst I whole heartedly agree with you and would also prefer Bony, making up stats to suit your agenda is pitiful. So here are the real stats

2012/13
Ligue 1, 28 games, 3 goals, 7 assists
Champions league, 9 games, 5 goals, 0 assists
Coupe de France, 4 games, 3 goals, 0 assists

2013/14
Ligue 1, 32 games, 9 goals, 3 assists
Champions league, 10 games, 2 goals, 4 assists
Coupe de France, 1 game, 1 goal, 0 assists

Therefore his actual stats in the last 2 years in France are 23 goals and 14 assists. If you think that is bad from a winger I suggest you look up average statistics for top level wide players. If for nothing else, his Champions league experience would be vital to us. He has been directly involved in 11 goals in his last 19 Champions league games. By all means, dislike the player and have an opinion. But do everyone a favour and stop making things up. 12 league goals yes. 12 goals? No. Its hard to look good alongside Ibra. He's the most egotistical "pass it to me" player in modern football and his intimidating presence always causes his team mates to under perform which is why he can never stay in one place for too long. Nobody who he's ever played for likes him!

So yeah, I'm with you on the Bony thing, but stop bending the truth about Lavezzi and judging a creative player on his (incomplete) goal tally.

Agree7 Disagree19

The fact that Origi has gone back on loan (I appreciate he has had to for the terms of the deal) is a bit of a thorn in our side.

I think we need another striker in our current squad; will we need one when Origi returns?

Then do we go for a left winger/striker? Bot if it will damage Ibe's chances.

Maybe we will buy Bony and then Lambert will be 4th choice the season after this.

It looks like Sturridge is fit (from the training pics at Anfield this week); so if he's fit we don't need to panic on buying a striker and there is still another 3 weeks of the transfer window open.

Agree4 Disagree0

Hoola, that is a problem.
I really don't s many younsters getting meaningful gametime

Agree7 Disagree0

It's a difficult one Big Al,

I'll try not to go into how is or should get a chance this year; however Ibe featured heavily in Pre-season so we can use him as an example.

I think we have too many similar players in one position and for this they cannot all play (Coutinho, Sterling, Lallana, Texira, Suso, Markovic, Ibe etc. ); people will say they can play in multiple positions but in reality comes your going to play your best team - I can't see some of the youngsters getting game time.

By the same token I remember when we would buy the youngsters; stick them in the reserves for 2 years then if they were good enough promote to the 1st team (Jamie Rednapp). Just the reserve league isn't as competitive or has enough games IMO now.

So do you send your youngsters on loan where the coaching isn't going to be of the same standard or hold onto them?

Bringing in more players makes sense and competition for places is healthy as long as everyone gets the same chance to play at the end of the week (which possibly hasn't happened with some of the signings - Alberto or Ilori).

Apologies to the OP sort of gone in a completely diff direction to the original post.

So to get back on track - I don't think Lavezzi is an option; I think we need an out and out goal scorer (with pace) IMO.

Agree with EMS over Ibra comment as well - Sterling started developing to the player he is today when he stopped passing all the time to Suarez and made some of his own decisions.

Agree3 Disagree0

Hoola
I have stated previously.mate thãt I really don't see youngsters getting a real chance to break into.the first team especially if we have a rocky start to the season. You are correct. We do have a lot of no 10's. Though they can.play across the line( their best.postition is behind the striker imo. Texeira is a big talent and with lallana in( who I rate very highly) I don't see his gametime coming anytime soon.
We have a lot of attacking players but we have to be brutally honest. We have only one top finisher in.sturridge. i'm very confident BR will address this

Agree4 Disagree0

Ems he was talking about the league for 12 goals in 2 seasons.
No 1 really gives a rats about cups.

As for making up stats, You've been guilty of it yourself with regards to Lukaku and Bony

Agree6 Disagree0

Bobatron
I think everyone knew I was talking about league goals. Give the kid a break this time ;)

Agree2 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 19:34:17
Dont quite grasp why folks want top 4 this season, surely after finishing 2nd and spending 100mil or so we should be title challengers?

Believable10 Unbelievable5

09 Aug 2014 19:56:44
That's a serious question and I would love us to challenge the title. After spending well over Chelsea, City, UTD and Arsenal. We shouldn't allow them finish above us.

Agree5 Disagree0

Finishing in the top 4 Is basically challenging
For the title

Agree9 Disagree1

09 Aug 2014 20:10:09
Because as much as I would love we aren't strong enough the title this year. We superseded expectations last year and Chelsea, spurs and United will be stronger than last year. People know what to expect from us this year and I think a lot more bus parking will take place. We need to establish ourselves as a consistent top 4 team before we can challenge on all fronts. I would love to be wrong but I am managing my expectations.

Agree2 Disagree4

Realism, Suarez was a big part of why we challenged. We have more fronts to compete on, new players that need to gel, losing our best player, fix our defensive problems. Furthermore Chelsea, City, Arsenal, Tottenham and Utd will/have all strengthened.

I believe we will get top 4 anything more than that is a bonus. Too many new variables to consider, I would consider top 4 to be building on last season since we lost Suarez.

Agree10 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 20:18:57
Keeping expectations low just in case. Top four is the minimum expectation, winnin the leage will be a huge bonus.

Agree3 Disagree0

Yeah but like it or not, Suarez was a huge part of that title challenge.
Not saying we can't do it again but there a lot of ifs and maybes this season.
I think we need to stay in the top 4 as a priority after being away so long and cement ourselves in it.

Agree4 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 20:24:50
The loss of Suarez, and the hit and miss signings we have been making. Retaining top 4 is the aim.

Agree5 Disagree0

We will be. Mingolet will obviously improve, our defence is stronger even if we don't sign anyone else and just play Manquillo, Lovren, Sakho and Flanno. Our midfield is far stronger now with Lallana and Can offering much better options than Lucas and Allen.

The only place we're weaker is up front but we still have a 25 goals a season striker up top and the window hasn't even shut yet. Besides, Sterling is a year older, Markovic has come in also so we might not even play with 2 strikers and if we do, what's to say Markovic and Sterling won't be used up top alongside Sturridge and Lambert.

Seriously, some people need to get off Suarez's knob and start accepting that player for player only City have a stronger squad than us now. We might not have an individual star anymore (although I disagree, at any other club Sterling and Sturridge would be accepted as world class) but we have a cohesive unit and a strong team. Start supporting them and stop trashing them for gods sake.

Agree6 Disagree15

The point is to cement ourselves into a top 4 team for the future. Coming 4th is not a step back, it will likely secure us with future champs league revenues endorsements, and help balance the books

We also have a young squad that within the next 5 years should see many of them all hit their primes at the same time. It's a long term plan for future success

Agree3 Disagree0

EMS - I agree people should forget about Suarez, teams may not be able to set-up to combat against him (regardless of his unpredictability); also other players will have to take responsibility (it done Sterling no harm when he realised he shouldn't just pass to Suarez).

I disagree that you think we have a squad that is 2nd to city's; its a lot better but the are still some holes; not complaining but I think currently - out of last seasons top 7 there are probably 5 better left backs in our rivals teams - some teams have more than one that is better than ours.

A recognised striker wouldn't go a miss - yes Sterling and Markovic can cover but that also leaves us weaker in other areas.

Regardless I have high hopes for us season and if Breden keeps improving then we will be there or there abouts at the end of the season.

Agree2 Disagree0

We did fine without suarez, we do however need a new finisher to replace his goals but I still think we should be aiming for 1st, we now have a squad for more comps so no excuses imo.

Agree1 Disagree0

I don't know how it is obvious that Mingolet will improve this season. Has he shown something extra in training? A new keeper coach?

Agree3 Disagree0

The target for me is for Liverpool to be competitive again this season.
We were right in the race from the opening game of last season to the last game of the season and that is all any fan can ask for.
I would just like some decent cup runs as well this year!

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 19:08:37
Hi eds.
What's your take on the BBC' Tim Vickery stating he's been told Liverpool are close to signing a top striker but its not Falcao.

Believable5 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - I have no view on the matter. If he uses subjective terminology like "close" and "top", what do you expect me to say?}

When he says a big name striker, is that van hennigor of hesselink? Now that's a big name striker. I'm here all week!

Agree4 Disagree2

Well as I see it could be between Reus, Falcao, Cavani and Lavezzi. Got a feeling it's Lavezzi though I may be wrong. Ed can you shine some light on the matter?

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - RTFP.}

Yeah, I saw that Tim Vickery quote too.

I really hope it's Reus who'll we'll be signing. That bloke has everything!

A bit of Suarez about him in regards to close ball control and change of direction or nutmegging players to find space for a shot on goal - and he seems to know where the net is too.

Imagine the nightmares opposition defenders would have the night before facing a front 3 of Sterling, Sturridge & Reus.

Let's hope he gets a good reception and doesn't get injured in tomorrow's friendly.

Agree2 Disagree0

I think Vickery stated it was a south American player so it wouldn't be Rues.

Agree3 Disagree0

Why don't you ask Tim who he's banging on about?
He's obviously doing a bit of self promoting.

Agree1 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 18:22:52
Just watching the first half of the spurs game. Can't help but see some similarities between us and them. Managers with similar styles, both teams bringing in a large number of players in the same window a star leaves. We both have the same tramsfer targets as well too! They need a striker and so do we.
We will benefit from having a settled manager and will hopefully ween the signings into the team, unlike spurs under avb who just started about 5 of them in the first game and never really gelled.
I just can't see why they've brought vorm, he's too good to be second fiddle to lloris. They have an overload in midfield, I would be happy to take Sandro of their hands, quality player.

Anyway. Let's hope we stuff them again!

Believable5 Unbelievable0

09 Aug 2014 17:02:16
Liverpool look set to offload veteran defender Kolo Toure to Trabzonspor after reportedly agreeing a £1.5m fee with the Turkish side

Believable15 Unbelievable4

10 Aug 2014 06:58:12
Hmm, it seems as though its the Metro reporting it. More inclined to believe Ed002 that that ship has sailed as she said in an earlier post.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 16:28:11
Does Anyone Prefer Skrtel over Sakho in central defense?

Believable6 Unbelievable29

Yes, Sakho makes me nervous when he has possession

Agree10 Disagree20

Skrtel makes me nervous when they have possession

Agree26 Disagree3

Have to agree, not seeing this so called " beast " of a defender than so many others see.
I think he looks very uncomfortable in possession and is very rash in challenges.
However, hopefully this was due to first season nerves and he gets more confident especially with a class act like Lovren beside him. Though I'm still concerned with our fullbacks and I think our CB's will be under pressure if we don't get settled, good defending fullbacks in the next couple of months.

Agree3 Disagree6

09 Aug 2014 18:07:09
Sakho is a little bit erratic in possession but he is a beast of a defender and in certain moments of a match you need players like that. He is young and with games he will develop parts of his game that need improving. He cost us a decent amount of money and has played for France been captain of PSG so I have faith in the lad.

Agree10 Disagree1

Teenage Mutant Ninja Skrtle

Agree1 Disagree2

It's playing alongside skrtle and Johnson that makes him nervous.
He looked a beast playing for France and for his last club.
We are yet to see the best of him, lovren will be a good partner for him.

Agree13 Disagree0

Both tend to have lapses in concentration especially their positioning.

I believe Sakho will become a top defender but it would have to be Lovren and Agger for me lads.

Red Rum

Agree2 Disagree8

Agger looks elegant and cultured on the ball BUT can no longer defend with grit and strength. I know who I`d want in my team.

Agree2 Disagree0

Its sakho for me and the world cup underlined 2 factors one he showed us he can defend and 2 he plays better when he knows he can trust the other CB next to him, I think with skertal and johnson and no left back then his head must be all over the place, but again I point to the world cup he can defend good

Agree3 Disagree0

Sakho is very good on the ball anyone that says otherwise is a fool. he never gives the ball away. if you watch him properly you'll see. his passing is very good.

Agree3 Disagree0

Sakho will be a beast for us this season.

Agree4 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 20:08:18
If skrtle stopped hugging everyone who comes in our box I'd take him and lovren.

Agree4 Disagree1

10 Aug 2014 02:38:37
Absolutely not. Why does everyone get on Sakho's back, he's top class imo.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 15:04:59
Do people not remember how awful we were before Rodgers came in?
Losing to Blackpool?
Playing boring football.
Remember the Chelsea game when we had to play Meireles up front?
We were in an absolute mess.
Rodgers has come in and we have seen nothing but progress.
We almost won the league last year!
We should have won the league last year!
Not even the most optimistic Liverpool fan would have predicted that.
Rodgers is amazing.
He knows what he is doing.
We have an unbelievably young, talented and strong squad.

We coped without Suarez.
We would have had to cope without him again this season.
Thank God we got that much for him before he gets a year or life ban.

With sterling, Lallana, Coutinho and Markovic playing behind Sturridge we are going to destroy teams.
There is no team that can deal with that pace.

I cannot wait for this new season.
We are going to be challenging for the League and the Champions League.

Believable26 Unbelievable8

With so much optimism Fidby you must know of an incoming 20 goal plus a season striker coming in.

Agree2 Disagree19

09 Aug 2014 16:21:20
Agree, Rodgers has worked wonders. Thing is I guess he is now under pressure to deliver after both the 2nd place and the £100m spending this window.

I hope the FSG guys are more realistic then most fans and the media. They seem to be, seems to be a case of further ahead then expected.

I always want to win the league of course and believe we can. But, Top 4 again, strong challenge and a good run in the cups, maybe latter stages of CL for me would still be a great season, would still be progression and I'd still like to have BR in place to continue.

Main thing is that times are feeling positive, we're so much more in a better place on field, looks like Stadium situation is coming along as well. Football is enjoyable & exciting.

Only concern comes from Ed002. She voices a concern on our finances and debt. I appreciate what the Eds do on here and believe the knowledge they share, so I take this on board. Without this, things would be approaching perfect.

Agree4 Disagree1

He could be going upon the evidence gathered from last season rather than a possible good striker.

Agree0 Disagree0

I am with you Flidby.

The negativity is astonishing.

To put it into context, in Kenny's full season in charge, we had no European football and finished 8th, after spending over £100 million net that summer.

Last season Rogers had no European football and we finished 2nd, after spending approximatley £30 million in the summer.

What do people want!
Some perspective please.

Agree6 Disagree1

Ozone what makes you think we won't bring a striker in surely the fact we went for remy proves were looking at a striker hardly brendan/ayre/fsg fault that he failed a medical although it fits your anti fsg agenda i'd be amazed if we didn't sign another striker borini is more than likely to leave for what its worth a south american pundit tim vickery reckons were after a big name he doesn't say who and he could be chatting nonsense I reckon we will get another striker in have faith you may be suprised but I know you have no faith in fsg for what ever reason but your consistent if nothing else

Agree4 Disagree0

Chill. Why is everyone so up in arms about Ozones opinions? Re read his posts for the first two thirds of last season. Ozone, I wish you as much luck with your 'facts' as you had last season. Keep it up son.

Agree2 Disagree7

Giblet, I've heard ducks eat in long grass before. We apparently lined up Mickey, willian, Salah, Costa, Kono, sanchez etc etc., nothing comes of it. We won't pay the wages. It's punts in and around £10 mill unless Brendan raises the fee through sales. Sanchez was last chance saloon for a player to remotely replace the quality of Suarez. There's nothing else out there.

Agree2 Disagree7

The mills and boom clan are out in force. Happy days.

Agree4 Disagree3

We actually played dynamic football before Rodgers but only weren't clinical enough.

Agree2 Disagree3

Jay91, your missing 1 bit of information we actually won. . yes won the league cup under dalglish or did you forget that, you can play all the pretty football you want under rodger's but if there's no end product what's the point. . and i mean winning something, isn't that what success is all about. . .rodger's is only interested in his philosphy. .

Agree5 Disagree7

Success in modern day football is top 4 over any domestic cup. Unfortunately!

Agree2 Disagree0

Successes of last season were Hendo, Suarez, Sterling, Flanagan all given debuts by the King. We witnessed a record for hitting the woodwork in Kenny's season, and the man of the match formost of our home games was the oppositions goalkeeper. And though you don't get points for that.It does show that we didn't play that badly under Kenny. My post is not criticizing our manager now. It's just defending our last manager and the trophy and trips to wembley he gave us.

Agree4 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 19:57:58
The Irish Rover

How about the PL title. You get two in one.

Agree0 Disagree0

Rodgers is the best most intelligent bravest cutting edge young manager around period.

Agree2 Disagree1

09 Aug 2014 20:01:50
BR got the best out of Sterling, Hendo, Suarez and Sturridge last season. And for that Hatss off to him.
But I wouldn't hand him 100 mill to spend on players. He is still pretty raw in Transfer market.
As Ed01 said the other day
The 3 most important position to be filled after last season were. LB. GK. A player for Suarez. Unfortunately none has been filled.

Agree3 Disagree1

Fa CUP, League CUP!

Agree2 Disagree0

I think it's more the transfer committee spending 100m not just Rodgers Harry.
A left back and striker will come in soon.

Agree1 Disagree0

THE IRISH ROVER, so what your saying in modern football if LFC never win another trophy in the next 25 years but finish in the 4th, 3rd, or 2nd, your saying that that's success. . . how the standards of this great club have dropped. . . if we can't aim for 1st after finishing 2nd last year then we may as well give up.

Agree3 Disagree0

Wembley 78

The League cup isn't even worth mentioning.

Yes we won, and it was a great day but it was one day in the context of an awful season, losing at home to Wigan and Fulham to name a few.

Are you seriously saying 8th place and a Carling Cup is better than 2nd and no cup?

Agree0 Disagree2

JAY91, it depends what your standards are, you seem to be diluting your's. no matter what way you look at it is there in LFC history books, we actually WON something. . 2nd is nowhere remember. .

Agree1 Disagree1

Liverpool is surely in business to win trophies so I would take normally take 8th and a cup over say 4th and no cups.
The problem is the champions league.
I personally think that teams who have won the European cup in the past would not have to qualify for it.
Like the masters in golf. once you have won it then your in the hat forever.

Agree0 Disagree0

Im didn't say we shouldn't aim for 1st in the league. What i'm saying is that a top 4 spot and playing in the CL is more important than a Cup in modern day football. We would be a laughing stock (as we have been) if we continue to finish outside the top 4, even with a trophy.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 14:48:26
Hi Eds,
Are trabzonspor still keen on signing Kolo Toure?

Thank you

Believable1 Unbelievable3

{Ed002's Note - That has all passed.}

Hey ed, are gala still interested in skrtel?

Agree3 Disagree1

{Ed002's Note - That has all passed.}

09 Aug 2014 14:21:28
Rumours flying about regarding Icardi from Inter

any legs on this? He looks a decent player to be fair.

Believable0 Unbelievable4

{Ed002's Note - RTFP.}

Let me guess. Another Aspas/ Borini type punt by any chance?

Agree1 Disagree5

09 Aug 2014 11:42:21
If the attempt to sign Moreno fails eds have we other LB options we have considered or even contacted?

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Done to death.}

09 Aug 2014 13:42:37
I think Moreno is nailed on after the super cup final.

Agree5 Disagree0

Moreno probably wants to play as a final goodbye to his fans.

Agree4 Disagree0

Good lad. Shows how much he cares about his hometown club that gave him a chance to play pro football. I like his personality and commitment already.

Agree3 Disagree1

09 Aug 2014 11:33:51
hi

ed/s

whats the fantasy football code thanks
have a fab weekend

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Try the search engine.}

The code is781641 - 191102

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 11:37:06
I'm hoping we've bought all the squad depth before big guns come in. Easier to sign squad players if they have more belief they'll get a game.

Here's hoping that's the logic.

Believable1 Unbelievable14

09 Aug 2014 11:55:55
There's no pleasing some people. Ofcourrse all the players we have signed will get a game, we have an extra competition we are in and I'm sure we will want to challenge on all fronts, injuries will happen too. Bit of a daft statement from you if I'm honest

Agree7 Disagree1

If you think spending £25million on one player and £20 million on 2 other players is just for squad depth, then you are mistaken.

They are the big guns!

Agree7 Disagree3

09 Aug 2014 11:09:00
Andre Yedelin for less than £3 millions? the bargain of the summer. If he wouldn't play in the US - which the whole world think don't know anything about football, he would have cost 5 times as much. Appernatly we were after him and gave up so totenham take it. Why did we give up? for this price even if it runs up he is not good enough you didn't lose much - and if he is playing like he played in the World cup you are laughing all day long. His style is a bit like Glen Johnson but I think he is stronger and quicker very much suitable for the pace of the PL, maybe less for other European leagues. Remember what I tell you, in 12 months no one will believe he was bought for this price.

Believable6 Unbelievable5

Just maybe we gave up as we have flanno kelly and recently signed manquillo and johnson and wisdom out on loan I know strength in deph is important but I don't think we need 6 right backs and he did have a good world cup i'd like to see how he gets on for spurs but we didn't need him and we can't sign every player available

Agree1 Disagree2

People talking about Yedlin have prob NEVER seen him play consistently so not bothered. I saw him play and he has pace to burn and. . That`s about it. As a fullback, pace is NOT everything. You need good positioning, awareness, passing and crossing ability as well as the ability to smell danger and come across to deal w/ it. As the boy is very young, he`s not ready yet.

Agree1 Disagree2

09 Aug 2014 10:45:00
Ed01, Great day ahead. This one for you to pick up your mood.
Are you personally happy in Selling Borini and bringing Lambert? My first Impression was to have 4 strikers, Lambert replacing Aspas and bring a Sanchez type player for Suarez.
Borini is younger and would give us at-least 4-5 years, where Lambert is 32.
Someone said here Origi was purchased to replace Lambert next year?
This makes no sense to me.

Believable5 Unbelievable2

{Ed001's Note - I would prefer to keep Borini and give him a chance to see what he can do.}

Borini is crap, his first touch is a throw in, positioning poor, runs around like a headless chicken with no end product and couldn't finish his tea.

How anyone can want him to stay is quite frankly staggering

Agree11 Disagree21

Waro don't hold back"
To be fair he's a decent player but I wouldn't want to rely on him for goals if sturridge isn't fit. I don't think we can afford to take thãt chance or we could end up missing CL football next year.if sturridge has a long term injury. We will sign another striker imo

Agree3 Disagree0

I would be happy enough if he was sold but we need someone else to replace him.

Agree2 Disagree1

I agree with Waro. As much as I love Borini's attitude and commitment I think LFC is too big a club for him.

Agree2 Disagree6

09 Aug 2014 12:48:16
Waro

You got my post completely wrong. If Borini isn't good enough, What about Lambert?. 32 years old. What you think he would bring more than Borini?
I rate Borini more than Lambert any day

Agree1 Disagree3

09 Aug 2014 13:12:59
I honestly think Borini could be top player for us.

Agree1 Disagree7

You really need to explain what you see in borini to say he's better than lambert

Agree2 Disagree1

I don't think he will be a top player for us, but a very good back up option if played in the right position.
He's proved it at Sunderland.
I wouldn't be disappointed to see him stay although I think the best option (for him at least) would be to leave to get more football.

Agree1 Disagree0

Waro, you must have splinters all over your a**e sitting on that fence

Agree4 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 10:25:21
According to ssn Italy, Lazio has rejected Liverpool's opening bid and have responded by demanding €30 million for the goal-scorer.

Believable0 Unbelievable3

Who for?

Agree0 Disagree0

No player involved. Its just a bid, a token gesture. Madness!

Agree2 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 12:01:38
Anyone that scores goals in their team we have that much money to blow we don't care who the player is anymore. .

Agree0 Disagree1

The boy Kieta I think.

Agree0 Disagree0

It's not madness. It's genius.

If you pay 30 million and you don't know who for - what message does it send?

That our coaching staff is so confident in their ability it doesn't matter who they buy. This will intimidate our rivals.

Alexis who?

Agree3 Disagree0

That's a lot of money.
It's got to be Nedved.

Agree0 Disagree0

Candreva I think. Good player
Not worth $30m

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 09:34:21
well this has been a weird transfer window for us . ( well most are anyways) but this takes the cake.
we are signing personnel that we don't even need.
we sell our best striker and are yet to replace him and have spent millions already and we haven't signed a striker to replace suarez and a LB either.
whoever is taking the decisions might have his reasons but I now seriously believe that our beloved club has the most stupid transfer team. they buy emre when a certain medel is available. ( I don't know emre is a good player, but medel is just better)
and I am pretty sure apart from lovren, none of the players we signed are going to play 20 games for us this season
i mean I would have signed lovren, origi, A LB and medel and be done with it!
i know this isn't going to well recieved, I mean we finished 2nd last year for what just to sign 11 new players.
i really fear for our season. we would be again builiding up a new squad letting them fit in and finish about 5-7th.
lets hope I have to eat my words

Believable7 Unbelievable15

09 Aug 2014 09:42:45
Its Strange that we haven't bought a CDM or even looked at one. Gerrard isn't a DM and Can looks more like a B2B player. Without a DM we would defo struggle in the middle when the opposition attacks.
Medal would have been an excellent addition.
Seems Ed01's Fav's are being knocked back. Sanchez. Medal.

Agree2 Disagree2

09 Aug 2014 09:58:34
Lol, now now Akshit, calm down. The season hasn't even started, no need for doom and gloom. Trust me, we'll be fine. We very much required squad depth, we have that to a certain extent. LB is a priority and one more striker. I'm sure we will see a couple more players joining the team before the window closes. As for Emre Can, he's going to be top dollar beast. He has already shown glimpses in pre-season.

Agree5 Disagree0

So what about a striker? I presume you don't mean you would replace Suarez with Origi?

Agree0 Disagree0

Um. larger squad needed maybe?

Agree0 Disagree0

If we sign a top DM then Gerrard will be sat on the bench why is that so hard to understand? No manager will replace Gerrard. There's one position in the team he can play DM & when he can't do that he'll retire we aren't going to force him out

Agree0 Disagree1

09 Aug 2014 11:05:36
Eez

I know, But isn't the Club bigger than any player? Certainly that's what's rounding here since some time.

Agree2 Disagree1

I think that is pretty daft! To suggest a player will be selected purely on sentiment? I would not have thought so.

Agree1 Disagree1

To be fair after if our first 3 games are poor results then I'll bet the site will be crawling with posts like this. I just most of the posters don't change their tune. Emre Can was an extra midfielder signed. I'm assuming he can do the holding role however have never seen him play. We don't use a massive physical presence in holding midfield. Rodgers prefers a ball player, and who is a better ball player than Gerrard? I know he has his flaws but he will still be a huge player for us. I now want to see a striker come in and a left back. I didn't see the need for Manquillo or Origi right now. I didn't see the need to get both Lallana and Markovic. I really hope their injuries don't set the tone for their season. Lovrean I am over the moon with. A top defender. I think it was Chris who recommended him 2-3 seasons ago.

Agree2 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 09:31:42
Markovic back to training next week

Believable5 Unbelievable2

09 Aug 2014 09:25:03
I have read few post, about some pundits already writing our season off and telling the public that we over achieved last season and now that Manchester United have a new manager they will challenge for the title. "Liverpool don't have their best player anymore." " They now have to juggle their squad, because they are in Europe." " They won't be able to concede 50 odd goals this season and finish top 4."" Brendans wasting the money like Spurs did"
The pundits are just giving their opinions and what they say are going to cause debates. And that's exactly what they are getting paid to do.
I am not interested in what Charlie Nicholas has to say on Liverpool's affairs, as a lot of the time he says things to wind up Phil Thompson, sitting next to him and it's good tv, for the watching public.
The truth is. We will miss Suarez, and what team wouldn't? Manchester United will improve under Van Gaal, because he is a proven, world class manager. We could also say that they will improve, because they are not in Europe. Like it or not, it certainly did help us achieve a top 4 finish, last season, as our squad might not of been strong enough to cope with the extra games. And conceding 50 odd goals in a season can still get you a top 4 finish, if you outscore most of the opposition you play against.
The one thing you can say to these pundits, is that Liverpool will be on the telly and live radio more than any other team, before xmas, because of the exciting way we went out to win our games.
Most of the fans who don't support a top table team, but like to watch football on the telly, will watch us play, because they know it will be an open game and not a chess match. So don't let the pundits into your heads. You can soon figure out what pundits are out to stir up the Liverpool fan. If they don't give Liverpool any credit, they just make themselves look silly(Robbie Savage style). I hated Gary Neville the player, but I loved watching him squirm, when having to give us credit last season and to be fair, he gave honest assessments, because he knows that the unbiased genuine Burnley,

QPR, Bristol, Bournmouth supporters and other football fans that are tuning in, will expect a fair judgement. let's look forward to the new season and let's see where our attacking football gets us this year. Come on you reds.

Believable6 Unbelievable1

09 Aug 2014 09:36:04
Jimny Cricket

The strange thing here is the level of expectations have gone down from title contenders to 4th place finish.
Is that coz, We would have an additional 6 games in midweek?
No club have spend more money than Liverpool this summer, So Hows Chelsea, City, and Arsenal would finish above us?

Man UTD would be a threat, If they spend their huge chunk of money wisely. Players like Vidal and Benatia would genuinely make them title contenders in one single season.

But As far now, Liverpool have been the highest spenders. If not money Then what's going to get us the title.

Great Weakened Eds.

Agree8 Disagree3

I think Liverpool will finish above United next season. Our squad already looks stronger than there's. Add another striker and a left back and our squad is solid. Rooney will burn out after a few games because his fitness is awful and van Persie will be injured at some point. They won't be able to blow away all the cobwebs of last year and no team in the league will fear them anymore.

Agree6 Disagree4

If they don't sign a bloody good defender, possibly two, then they will struggle.

Agree0 Disagree0

Charlie Nicholas goes back to him choosing the bright lights of London with Arsenal over us when we dominated, him signing for Arsenal done nothing to change things, I think they beat us in the League cup final mind you, devastates me to this day, not. Any time Nicholas gets a chance he has a go at us and doesn't give credit when it is due.
Lets hope the same thing happens with Sanchez, great player by the way, wish we got him.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 09:04:34
Hi guys,

Does anyone know a good streaming site, which you can pay for?

I prefer these as you don't get the pop ups and interuptions.

The last one, ch1 streaming has been taken down. Any help is appreciated.

Regards

Crooky

Believable0 Unbelievable0

09 Aug 2014 09:40:54
You could pay LFC a fiver a month for access to Liverpool TV rather than giving someone else your hard earned money - it's good for pre-season matches and you can watch proper match highlights and the full game a day later (if you can stand to wait!)

Hope this helps

Agree1 Disagree0

Wiziwig is good live streaming website, it gives you several choices of channel with varying quality; but there is usually a few that work well.
Good Luck
BVB game live on BT Sports1 tomorrow!

Agree4 Disagree0

Tomorrows game is also live on FoxSports for anyone in Australia.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 20:41:03
I don't know how it is where you are, but I stream all the games on nbcsports for free in America. All I have to do is have that channel on my home system and I can stream it. It's hd and with decent internet is the way to do.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 08:51:26
Any idea if he stay, looking likely, Assiadi can play more central or cover Sterlings wing if Sterling moves more central?

He has pace and skill Rodgers bought him, he's now proven he can assist and score in the prem. Would a move to forward bring out the best? Not saying the Henry but maybe an option in a player we are paying, currently for nothing?

Believable1 Unbelievable3

09 Aug 2014 09:20:16
Is it me, or does Assiadi look quite a bit like Benzema?

Agree2 Disagree6

He's a pure winger. Have ye ever even seen him? He reminds me of Aiden McGeady on the wing. Still think he'll go tho.

Agree1 Disagree1

09 Aug 2014 13:58:51
Of course i've seen him, that's why I said they look a little alike (from the pics that I came across). However, think you are right, he'll go to Stoke I reckon.

Agree0 Disagree0

Haha sorry Kash I thought you meant playing style! They do look alike alright but I'd say there are other sites for discussing things like that ;)

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 08:37:54
Can we get a poll going on lovren signing v Vermaelen signing for Barça. people saying we overspend but you have to compare what's happening in the world at the moment and if a Vermaelen who can't get a game ahead of koscielney and mertesacker is worth 15 mill then loveren is certainly worth 20 (reported fees) and I'd say wages etc would be similar.

Another note I'd like to bring up is player for player as things stand I feel we are stronger than Manchester United and arsenal my opinion again and obviously different systems but I think you would put more of our players in a combined team than either of the two mentioned!

Just a little optimistic post ahead of the season and I can't wait to see what happens now this season!

Believable4 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - I think the signing of Mathieu has shown Barca have no idea what they are doing in their transfers. I would prefer not to be compared to them. They sold Sanchez for almost the same amount they paid for Mathieu!}

Anyone who thinks Lovren is overpriced at £20m is a fool. Without doubt one of the best CD in the League last season, and I'd be saying that if he'd signed for Utd. Vermaelen for £15m is incredible! When was the last time Vermaelen played 10 games consecutively? Always out injured. The fact that he can't get a game ahead of Mertsaker or Koscielney speaks volumes too.
I can't understand why Barca don't try and sort out their defence properly rather than improving an already deadly attack. The fact that Mascherano has played CD for them on numerous occasions, the signing of Mathieu (a very average CD, who is 30) for £15.8m and that they are signing Vermaelen for £15m is berwildering! They could have gone out and used that money to sign Hummels! I know I'd rather have 1 Hummels than a Mathieu and Vermaelen!
For anyone still unsure whether Lovren is worth £20m just consider this, David Luis, £40m or was it £50m! Point made!
And to be honest, who cares if Lovren cost £20m, be glad we have the money to make this kind of signing, it could so easily have been a different story had H&G got their way!

Agree5 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 09:40:11
Ed01, Who do you predict to win the La liga? It would be quiet a task to keep Messi without a trophy for 2 years.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I disagree, Real Madrid are light years ahead of Barca right now, they should win the league quite easily. Though they will no doubt make heavy weather of it due to having so many personalities to keep in check.}

09 Aug 2014 09:47:14
Lovern is the Best signing of the season along with Lallana. But without a Strong DM, Our Back 4 would struggle. Now that's a fact. Lovern had 2 holding players at Southampton in front. He wouldn't have that luxury here.
The main reason Chelsea kept more clean sheets was the presence of Matic.

Agree1 Disagree1

Ya I agree wit ye. Lovren was a snip at £20m. £30m being paid across Europe for top centre backs nowadays.

Agree2 Disagree1

Macherano always did think he was a DJ playing CD's

Agree0 Disagree0

Yeah true that ed but Manchester United were supposedly going to pay something similar for vermaelen although point taken barca do have no sense with transfers. Ah well I still think we are player for player stronger than United and arsenal

Agree0 Disagree0

Edd001, matheui cost something.close to 16 million. Sanchez went for double that did.he not?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I was meaning in terms of the length of contract per price, as Mathieu was in his final year and is 30 years old, plus extremely average. While Sanchez was young, had a few years left in his contract and is much better. Sorry I should have mentioned that. But it was 18m they paid.}

Edd001, no your correct though in your assessment. You say Sanchez is much better, I don't really know if you can compare.them as there completely different positions but for price and what quailty you get for your money your spot on.

Agree0 Disagree0

I don`t get that Mathieu signing either, Ed. I`ve known him since his days at Toulouse and he is average at best. A true head-scratcher.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 07:40:26
Any news on Markovic eds? Is he injured and if so any idea on a return date?

Cheers :)

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - he is injured, the club's official date is next weekend for his return.}

Appreciate the update Ed001, been reading some horror stories about his injury elsewhere

Thank goodness for this site!

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - to be fair the club might not be being honest!}

09 Aug 2014 07:28:35
Morning all, so with Forster looking to arrive at a prem club sometime soon Soton seem the most likely destination and we r not interested. I'm surprised there has been no rumours over this position. Naturally on here it's all 'marque' striker BS but I've seen nothing in the press either about this position.
The keeper who I feel we should peruse is bergovic but after checking the search engine the last reference to him moving said it would happen this summer but again no lfc interest. I would have thought if we were in for a back up keep vorm would have been the obvious choice as BR knew him well so are we to think that another keeper isn't on the radar n migs is going to be given another season to prove he is able to step up (or step off his line!). I like migs but think he needs competition. Maybe now reina has gone an diff the wage bill we will b back in for a keep?

Believable2 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - Forster is a flapper with no command of his area, we weren't in for him because of that. I keep saying we have a new keeper on our list, but Begovic is out because he doesn't want to move, though he is the one Rodgers wants. If only the committee would stop messing about and sort out a left back, that was our number one priority before Smith went out on loan, yet we still don't have one, then we can think about a new keeper.}

Ed, do you think we would look for a keeper as backup to Migs or to be first choice?

If we are looking for a first choice keeper would that mean the end for Migs or Jones?

Final question, aren't Mignolet's wages very high for a backup keeper should that be the case?

For me, Begovic would be the perfect choice. I can't understand why he'd be so content at Stoke when he has the ability to do well for a top club.

Red Rum

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - Migs has not fully convinced and it would be a keeper to push/replace him, depending on how he responds.}

09 Aug 2014 09:48:45
Ed01, Whose your pick?. I was gutted to seem Vorm going to spurs for just 4 mill.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - Begovic all day long.}

09 Aug 2014 10:39:29
Ed01. Dead spot on. But we are late, Should have had him last year. he would be costly now and its foolishness (Economically ) to buy Begovic and keep Mignolet.

Agree0 Disagree0

Begovic has been my preference for a few years now. Why does he not want to come? I always felt that he would go to Arsenal, with their perennial CL qualification and goalkeeper problems. Now we have CL, I thought it would have been worth asking again. Is this one for summer if we back last season up with another positive campaign?

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - his wife likes it where they are.}

If that's the case ed, he needs to grow some balls. I wouldn't let my missus have that much say. She knows whos boss.

Don't tell her I said that though ;)

Red Rum

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed r u saying that the committee can only manage 1 negotiation at a time?! Jeez I thought that male stereotype was not true but it seems at LFC it is the case! Let's get Moreno done, then striker then keeper if there is still time in the window. Hope we don't panic buy!

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 06:48:39
http://www.Liverpool-rumours.co.uk/formations/ben0209.php

Our team vs southampton

Believable0 Unbelievable5

09 Aug 2014 06:41:28
Just wanted to express a few opinions, maybe even concerns. I admire the owners for the amount of money they have invested, it really shows that they are committed to getting our club back to where we should have been the past few years, I feel optimistic for the start of a new season for the first time in 4 years. But if i'm honest I am concerned about how the money is being spent. don't get me wrong, I believe that the players we have bought were needed ie. Lovren to plug the leaks, Markovic pacey winger ect. But we have paid through the nose for these players, players I believe yes add quality to the team, but at such an inflated price, I worry we are making the same mistakes as we have made in the past. And now these rumours (granted it may be c**p) about Lavezezzi, Falcao, Cavani, mercenaries who are imo no more talented than the players with hunger coming through the ranks, I worry we could easily slip back to where we were 2 years ago. It frustrates me when people go after someone like Bertrand (as an example) saying he is not good enough, we should be aiming higher and going for Moreno, who the majority of Liverpool fans have never seen play, just because he is Spanish and someone has decided he is worth 20 mil, no i'm afraid I have to disagree, just because Chelsea don't want him does not mean he is not top class. I lose patience with some fans calling for Falcao, at his price, wages and over hyped ability he would damage the club more than improve it, and to be honest he would have no more love for the club than Suarez did. GET A GRIP LADS and ladies, Fowler came from the ranks, Carragher came from the Ranks and so did, what's his name, emmmm Stevie something? It will come to me soon i'm sure!

Believable7 Unbelievable5

Whilst I agree somewhat with you there are certain things I do not agree with.

I agree being linked with Falco, Cavani etc. isn't going to happen; tbh do we actually think the club linked themselves or was it twitter?

I rate Ibe but he is not the finished article as yet and you can't say he is as talented as some of the players you've listed and therefore we should fill the team with kids over experience.

Ibe may one day surpass their achievements but you can't rule out experienced players.

Which then comes to the supporters /manager etc. You've just become Liverpool manager and tasked with getting into the CL each season and competing for the title - you are going to buy players (regardless of whether they appeared overpriced) as you want to give yourself the best chance to do so.

Furthermore - within two weeks of the transfer window being open (approx) we have two players as good as signed and people were "worried" that we hadn't completed more business and people wanting a marque signing - using an up and coming player to fill that role will not placate the fans expectations.

If we win the league on come a close 2nd this season will people still consider those players bought as over priced?

Agree0 Disagree0

So we should be signing Bertrand, not Moreno in your opinion, yet you say you feel we're making the same mistakes as last season? The mistakes we made was not paying up for quality and having to settle for the likes of Moses and Aspas instead of Willian and Costa. Bertrand couldn't even cut it at Villa and the fact that they even opted to go for Cissokho instead of going back for him says it all really -Now we're actually willing to pay up for quality players, people still moan. there's no pleasing you lot. The clubs shows ambition to try and get world class players, you complain that they are all mecenaries and overpriced? So what? Suarez was a mercenary but I'll have him back here any time. Really can't win with some fans honestly.
Plus we DO still have talent coming through from the academy though given our position now and the level we're playing at, its going to be a lot harder for them to break through.They have to be quality. Its not just a matter of oh, he's from the academy, play him. If they're as good as Sterling they'll get their chance. Simple.

Agree4 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 09:55:09
Red Till am Dead

You post looks pretty honest. But Lavezezzi, Falcao, Cavani, mercenaries?. How are these players Mercenaries. They are at a club where they are paid huge salary. Y would they take a pay cut?
So all those who getting paid are Mercenaries?

Agree0 Disagree1

09 Aug 2014 09:57:34
So how many players from the academy are playing for UTD, CITY, and Chelsea?

Agree1 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 07:12:49
This blue link takes you to my prediction for the Liverpool lineup vs Southampton match.

Bearing in mind that it is highly unlikely we will sign a LB and/or Striker in time to throw them in to the first game.

This is not what I myself would like to pick but I think Rodgers will go with this. Allen simply because Rodgers would probably prefer to sub Can on and so Allen will be there because of his PL experience. Lovren not Sakho because Sakho I guess is less sharp at this time. Johnson because experience with Enrique and Flanno seemingly not fit yet. Manquillo because I think he will want to play this guy for his attacking ability. This is the one I am really not sure of because Rodgers might just go with Kelly due to more experience and a pre-season with the club. Sterling up front because I think Rodgers would rather bring Lambert from the bench. Coutinho is at the point because Rodgers has recently described him as "the brain of the team" and he has looked really good whenever he players central. Predicted subs:

Can > Allen
Lambert > Coutinho with Sterling dropping to the point
Enrique > Johnson to aid Enrique with some PL minutes

Obviously this is all hypothetical but I am completely sure of the front 6 but with the back 4 I wouldn't be shocked If I was completely wrong, because to me it would make sense to play Sakho and Lovren asap if that is indeed the planned partnership for years to come, Rodgers might be thinking the same.

Anyway, If I'm totally wrong so be it, just a bit of fun, and I want to know what people think of that XI and also what different XI's people think will start.

Believable0 Unbelievable4

Gerrard, Can
Henderson, Coutinho, Sterling
Sturridge

Agree1 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 09:49:40
Haych, I think BR prefers to use Gerrard in a 3 man midfield or diamond so he can drop between the centre halves and not play as double pivot.

I think it'll be those player, Hatch just with Henderson deeper making runs forward.

Agree2 Disagree0

If Johnson gets a start Rodgers must be blind as I think he was responsible for nearly every goal we conceded so far in preseason

Agree0 Disagree0

I completely agree gmil, about Johnson. Even though he was nowhere near the pitch when we lost against Roma 1-0. I also had this feeling he was to blame.

Agree2 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 06:08:03
Gents,

I for one would be not surprised and not at all displeased with Raheem Sterling stepping up and leading the line when required, after all it didn't turn out too bad for a certain Terry Henry did it? And they have very similar attributes. Yes he is still raw but so was Terry when he made the transition That would leave space for young Jordan Ibe to step up and develop ala Sterling last season.

Any Thoughts?

Believable5 Unbelievable3

Wouldn't mind seeing this experimented in an early round of a cup, however, if BR was contemplating it why no sign of it pre-season? Unless he is already sure Raheem can do the job and is keeping the element of surprise should we need it at some point this season.

Agree0 Disagree1

He played up front with Suarez on a couple of occasions last season and did well, but yes it would be interesting to see how he does leading the line on his own.

Red Rum

Agree0 Disagree0

Given how much his strength, hold-up play, awareness and composure have improved in the last year I would love to see Sterling given the Suarez role, I think he is more than capable, as well as playing as the lone strike if Sturridge is out.
Perhaps this is BR plan all along and hence why no direct replacement for Suarez has been signed but a replacement for Sterling (playing wide) has been made in Markovic and with Ibe being given more game time pre-season?

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 10:47:23
Good point scarface.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 02:20:29
Who would you prefer, Cavani or Reus?
Banter haha cheers

Believable0 Unbelievable1

Stephen El Shaarawy day in day out

Agree2 Disagree4

Reus by a mile, for me.

Agree3 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 09:37:39
Reus. Cavani is'nt that good

Agree1 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 10:02:14
Roberto Firmnio, Better stats than Reus and Hazzard last season and is attainable.

Agree1 Disagree0

Hesky

Agree0 Disagree0

Reus all day he was not in the world cup if he was we'd no all about him now he would be in the top 5 players in the world

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 01:05:58
I am really pleased with our signings to date. Obviously we need a striker but we are not going to replace Suarez so we need to trust BR to find the best fit within our system.
I think we are covered in midfield. I like our mix of players and although we may lose a couple we have a better squad than people give credit. Emre Can and Lallana are enormous signings.
Defensively we have problems but we are in the process of resolving. Lovren is a great signing. A natural leader and may well end up captain. I rate Enrique as he is typical of the modern game. Full backs are nowadays wing backs. His agility allows him to cover his defensive weaknesses. Johnson is similar but he lacks that recovery process. I think Glen is under rated and some criticism is unwarranted but his age is against him. I expect him to go QPR.
I prefer Agger to Skirtel but I think either could go. Whilst Sakho looks clumsy he is decent and under rated.
Mignolet worries me. He isn't comfortable on the ball but he is a great stop stopper. He and Lovren need to get a grip defensively early doors.
So on the back of all that I think BR has been sensible on transfers. Nobody gets it right every time but I am happy with what we have to date.
I am slightly concerned about our forward options mainly due to Sturidge being likely to make just 66% of games.
Defensively we clearly have tightened up and if we can get Moreno or similar we are covered in all positions other than an out an out forward.
Very encouraging.

Believable4 Unbelievable0

09 Aug 2014 00:47:43
Hello Eds

Just wondering your opinion of why every year were completely written off in the league. As a squad we are much stronger overall obviously Suarez is a huge loss as he brought a pressure from the front in all games. Do you think we will get top four and what do the reds and eds think who would be best suited for replacing Suarez.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - written off? You mean by pundits? In which case, does it matter what they have to say?}

I think if you look at the teams squads and what they did in recent years (not just last year), the other top 4 are favourite, on paper. Chelsea, City, Arsenal and ManU have been consistently in the top 4 in recent years, unlike us. ManU had a terrible season last year but they brought a top class manager - of the kind that proves he makes a difference - and they are spending maybe 200M this summer and still have some top players in Rooney and VP. Arsenal got Sanchez, Chelsea Fabrigas among other names and City have enormus squad anyway but still did some good buys - Mangala for example (compare their defence of Kompany, Zabaleta and Mangala to ours).We lost a 40 goals machine (including assists), our defence was avarage last year, we have to deal with the unfamiliar (but welcome) burden of playing twice a week when CL is on, and none of our signings have played for a top Eurpean side and showed thier ability on this level. So objectivley I think you can see why we are being written off. I personally think that in order to compete for the league this season, after Suarez left, we probably should have land down the kinds of Sanchez + Vidal + Mangala+ a good LB and all the other signings we did, this is how far we are. But let's hope BR do the miracles he did last year with what we have and one of the other teams screw up.

Agree1 Disagree2

It's actually a good thing as it reduces the pressure on us

Agree2 Disagree1

It's a very tough league. City, a Chelsea, Arsenal, even United and Spurs all have very good teams. Of course, so do we. My personal expectation is 1st through 6th will be pretty tight, with a bit of a gap between 2nd and 3rd.

Agree2 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 00:02:23
sorry if I change the subject but does anyone think that having sturridge, sterling, lallana, lambert, henderson playing together will make the England team better? i'm thinking of the spain team with a lot of barca players init and the Germany team with munchen players

Believable5 Unbelievable4

09 Aug 2014 00:56:08
Unfortunately the players on their own aren't good enough, the quality of manager and general attitude must be changed and drastically improved.

Agree7 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 01:14:20
maybe the attitude might improve when they are playing with their league team mates that was my thought ,but manager I really don't know! we need someone who bleeds England and I just can't think of anyone who would stand there like the rest of us and belt out god save the queen

Agree2 Disagree0

You forgot to add 'miracle' great player I hear and a real game changer!

Agree1 Disagree0

Nothing will change so long as Roy is the manager. Even if Sturridge, Lallana, Sterling, Henderson scores 60 goals this season playing fantastic football it will not happen for England because Roy will simply put Sturridge as a winger and Welbeck as the striker.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 08:52:18
Well FORNAX you need to add more sugar on your diet!!

Agree0 Disagree0

England need to develop some sort of playing style and bring through their youngsters. A manager similar to Rodgers would be good.

Agree0 Disagree0

God save the queen shouldn't be sung at football matches. It's stupid we should get a decent song like the Welsh & Scottish. Land of hope & glory?

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 10:56:09
You should first need a top class manager who knows what's happening. Roy has got no clue.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2014 18:15:58
The doctor has prescribed the opposite, Po0l007.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Aug 2014 23:29:22
Hi eds, thanks for all the work your'e doing on here! i'm not going to put specific names on here, I was just asking how likely do you think we are of landing any striker?

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - 17.}

09 Aug 2014 04:48:20
Not 21 grams?

Agree1 Disagree0

Is that in inches or cm's Ed. LOL.

vrcomp
Y.N.W.A.

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Aug 2014 21:02:00
Hi eds not posted for a while however I remember a while back we where linked with jovetic, now markovic and jovetic have been all over twitter after a picture of them playing pes, they share an agent so guessing they are friends through that,

my question is would there be a possibility of us signing him I have always liked him and seems to be 2nd or 3rd choice at city and I think he would be a very good player for us if it happened

thanks

mcarroll92

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - My concern is with the other eight or nine strikers Liverpool have arriving this weekend, how would he fit in?}

We will just play a keeper and ten "marquee "strikers ed

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Aug 2014 19:54:16
Hi eds have we made a bid for Keira Balde Diao from Lazio? Reports are saying we have made a 16 mill bid but they are looking closer to 24 mill?

Believable0 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - I really don't know and that would be a pretty high offer for him. Maybe Brendan is still in the sweet shop looking to spend his pocket money.}

 
Change Consent