Liverpool Banter Archive October 08 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

08 Oct 2014 21:55:06
I don't know what r midfield needs a defensive midfielder r a creative midfielder does anybody else think like this and is this a bad sign r midfield is not cl quality yet.

Believable1 Unbelievable1

09 Oct 2014 06:08:59
I don't know about that, But out past manager's are equally responsible for the mess our club is in from past so many years.
Their stuppid spendings on poor players.

Agree11 Disagree0

Our midfield has been poor ever since Alonso and Mascehrano. We replaced two of the best midfielders in the world with either decent players like Lucas and Allen or deadwood like Poulsen and Spearing. I think LFC are the only heavyweight team in the UCL this season without a world class midfielder, and the results have shown the lack of quality.

Agree3 Disagree6

09 Oct 2014 09:19:25
Indian

Atletico reached the finals without any world class midfielder.
You don't need to have world class players necessarily. What u need is a well functioning midfield unit which works for each other and am sure can hendo and Lallana will provide that

Agree10 Disagree13

Reet, u do not think Koke is world class? i'm pretty sure he plays CM for Atletico. Gabi and Mario Suarez are not too shabby either and Tiago has been part of many title winning sides, so yes their midfield is quality.

Agree2 Disagree4

09 Oct 2014 09:40:20
Reet

Dont spout Rubbish.
Kokke, Herrerra, Turan, Costa. Are WORLD BETTER CLASS. They aren't world class names sor sure.

Now your next Example would be Dortumand.

That Dortumand midfeild would walk over our 200 mill worth Squad.

Agree6 Disagree5

09 Oct 2014 09:54:02
Reet

Athletico and Dortumand doesn't have world class names. But they do have world class players.

Koke, Herrera, Costa, Turan, VIlla are excellent players who took their club to CL Finals

Dortumand a couple of seasons ago had the best players in the wolrd.
Gotze, Reus, Lewandoski, Gundagaon, Subbotic, Hummels.

But Ofcourse, You always don't need to spend stupid money, But you defo needs world class players to reach CL finals.

Agree2 Disagree4

I believe rossiter could be a long term fixture in our team . Handy little player with very good distribution and excellent football intelligence for someone so young . Maybe a loan next year to the championship would do him some good

Agree2 Disagree0

09 Oct 2014 11:28:13
And I ask you, who made these world class players harry? Was it not the team and manager they played for? Surely they are great but playing under a good manager with a good setup helped them shine,maybe give lallana markovic and can the same chance, who knows they could surprise you,if not you always get another chance to complain

Agree3 Disagree2

09 Oct 2014 12:17:19
Cyprus

Fair enough. And May I ask you how much did they paid for all these players?

Gotze. Reus. Lewandoski. Costa. Koke. Herrera.

All these combined fees would be less than what we paid for Lallana or Markovic alone.

My point remains same, If you wanna spend high. No worries. But get it right. else don't sepnd it.

Agree0 Disagree2

09 Oct 2014 12:36:52
Indian and Harry
just in case you thought I backed out .
I did send in a reply. It wasn't posted

Agree2 Disagree1

09 Oct 2014 12:52:39
harry,

for a start, hererra came from bilbao and not madrid. secondly, the argument was about midfield so costa and villa don't even come into the equasion. i'm in agreement with Reet, the athletico midfield is far from star studded but people who do their job extremely well.

Agree1 Disagree0

It's worth noting the same management that got lewandowski cheap and brought through goetze, let both players go for almost nothing.

Koke is good, I don't see him as much of an improvement on our squad if we bought him though

I don't get why you mentioned villa and herrerra when talking about AM today, they aren't at the club boom

overrall I'm rather happy with the balance in the midfield.can, lallana, henderson, gerrad, allen, coutinho and leiva are good enough for the champs league

Agree2 Disagree0

09 Oct 2014 13:44:55
Bob

Gotze went after the release clause were triggerd which was pretty high, Lewondaski departure was a Gesture. Reus would go for an amount and they bought Mikhthiriyan

Agree0 Disagree0

Yup, i messed up there. Dunno where I got that idea from on goetze, for some reason I thought he went on a free with his contract running out.

Agree1 Disagree0

Going back to the original point, a proper defensive midfielder is the answer.

Agree2 Disagree1

LFC's midfield will not have a proper balance unless the club buys a world class CDM. We have not had one since Masch, Gerrard and Lucas simply do not cut it for me. Someone like Medel could have made a world of difference, just hope the management sees the need for one.

Agree0 Disagree1

Which Herrera is this people keep mentioning?

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Oct 2014 17:37:31
Fencey
Ander Herrera. Somebody got em mixed up and is failing to admit that

Agree3 Disagree0

10 Oct 2014 09:33:37
i would like to reply to indian buzzer,i agree with you that we need a midfielder,but why would you say that spearing was deadwood?spearing was a youth player and just did not make it,spearing never complained and left to play his football somewhere else.
Spearing gave everything when i saw him play for us
Malta

Agree2 Disagree0

Our midfield is strong when Rodgers sets it up right. Also can i just add that if you still don't think Henderson is world class you're absolutely mad. The only player who is better than Henderson in his role is Arturo Vidal and he is injury prone. When was the last time Hendo missed a game through injury.

We also have some great players (Lallana, Allen, Sterling), some players with great potential (Can, Coutinho, Teixeira, Markovic, Rossiter), and some decent players (Gerrard, Lucas).

This does however highlight our burning need for a top holding midfielder. We have two decent holding midfielders (Lucas-Destroyer, Gerrard-Anchor), and a couple with potential (Can and Rossiter), but no world class or at least a top midfield destroyer/anchor. It'd be nice to get Khedeira in January for this position.

Back to the point though, Hendo is a world class midfielder and I'm sorry but that is virtually undisputable. I would literally only consider swapping him for Vidal. Even then I'm not sure because of the injury issues/age. Name me a better box to box midfielder who is only 25 years old?

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Oct 2014 12:57:52
EMS
At the moment I'd pick Ramsey over hendo purely down to the fact that he contributes more through goals

Agree0 Disagree0

Ramsey is NOT in Hendo`s class and he has only had one good season in his 6yrs at Arsenal. Aresnal`s system makes players look good to the point that it made even Adebayor look world class so no credibility there. Hendo is a very good player and most importantly, works on the areas of his game that needs fine-tuning hence, he improves with almost every game he plays. Wit that attitude, he will be world class BUT I don`t think he`s there yet. As for Vidal being the only one better than him. I can name a few who are better than him namely Modric, Kroos, Marchisio, Vidal, Pogba just to name a few BUT he will get there, trust me.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - Ramsey was a fantastic talent before his injury, and was playing well then. It was only after a long injury he dropped off and people forget how good he was prior to then. Ramsey was seen as one of the brightest talents in world football before it, for good reason. He is better than you have given him credit for and has had more than one good season.}

Respect, ED. He might b better than I think BUT I`m very wary of giving Arsenal players too much credit because when they leave, they get found out to be not as good. (Adebayor, Fabregas at Barca, Song, and the list goes on.). He is a good player for sure BUT I don`t think he`s better than Hendo. In fact, I think Hendo will be the better all-round player in a couple of yrs BUT time will tell.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - Hendo is better right now, I agree, but that is more because of how good he is, rather than because Ramsey is not that good.}

08 Oct 2014 20:08:18
Hello to all the EDS and fellow REDS

In answer to a fellow poster:

The reason we don't play the formation of last year is because Suarez and Sturridge are both missing, of course, as a fellow poster had mentioned.

But I will predict that When Sturridge is back and we hopefully don't have any other injuries, our true power will come right out. How is it some fellow fans can't see this? We are a different proposition with Mario and Sturridge up front, sterling/coutinho/lallana behind them!
There's a rumour we're signing another striker, Diao (spelling) which would come in useful.
Here's to an injury free international forthnight.

YNWA

Believable4 Unbelievable2

09 Oct 2014 00:30:44
Yeh how can u not all see this, its there for all to see.
#you-go-again 😄

Agree2 Disagree8

Lets not sign another striker. I am looking forward to seeing Origi next season.

Agree2 Disagree0

Spot on Pile! I`m already salivating at the propect of having Origi w/ Ibe, Sterling, Studge and Balo. Now that`s a forward line that will wreak havoc, for sure. Can`t wait!

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 18:33:50
Cabaye isn't happy at psg
Not a rumour but sell lucas and buy Cabaye in a perfect world

Believable8 Unbelievable6

Exactly what i was thinking. probably getting used to some seriously good psg wages so may be out of our reach now. can see utd being more likely unfortunately if he does go

Agree4 Disagree0

Nearly posted this earlier! Perfect replacement for Gerrard

Agree2 Disagree2

08 Oct 2014 19:38:14
Nearly.

Cabaye is nearly 29. Replacement for a 34 year old?

Agree7 Disagree1

08 Oct 2014 20:19:04
Harry talking sense.

Agree3 Disagree1

He's actually 28

Agree3 Disagree1

Yes harry he's 5 years younger & a big improvement on current gerrard

Agree2 Disagree1

Harry talking bull ! ! ! He would be a grate player and also I said sell lucas so please explain how that is not a improvement

Agree2 Disagree1

Congrats to the guy that corrected Harry on cabayes age from nearly 29 to "actually 28!!!" It made my very slow and boring night. Hats off to you sir.

Agree4 Disagree1

I try my best NYD

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Oct 2014 06:12:21
Dezy

I think we lack a player in Matic mould, A DM which would give Lallana, Hendo, Allen and our fullbacks to contribute in attack.
Isn't Cabaye a CM?

Just asking mate.

Selling a DM and buying another CM?

Agree2 Disagree1

09 Oct 2014 06:24:57
Dezy

There was a player available at 5 mill, Now at Bayern. played 5. MOTM in 2, Broke 3 Bundesleague Records already.
1. Most successful tackles
2. Most distance coverd
3. Most successful passes.

Both Liverpool and Real are missing him.

Shedding another 15 mill for a CM is not the answer IMO.

Agree9 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - it has to be said, no matter what the cost, Xabi would have been worth it!}

09 Oct 2014 06:50:53
Ed01, Xabi would have saved the club in listening to BR and fans and buying another Xmill worth midfielders.

Agree5 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I don't care about that, all I care about is that he is the best in the world in his position on the football pitch. He has at least 2 years left in him at that level and his experience would have been vital to our youngsters. Could you imagine what Rossiter could have learnt from seeing him in training??}

09 Oct 2014 07:32:33
Ed01. Bang on. Not 2. He would give us 4 brilliant years. Imagine Hendo and lallana either side of him bossing the midfield. The younger ones's exspecially in the midfield position would learn a world of good from Alonso.

And the most important irony. Cabaye would be near 100k wages. Alonso would actually take a pay cut to join us.

Heard we are after Titoe from Newcastle. God save us.

Agree1 Disagree0

Yeah i'm in total agreement here, Xabi could have been bought and been a massive step up on anything we have in our midfield, the shortsightedness is outstanding

Agree0 Disagree0

Just to echo those thoughts boys Alonso should have been a priority. Vastly experienced and he is one of the best in his position.

Agree0 Disagree0

Alonso would have made us title challengers. His experience would have been brilliant for youngsters like Can and Rossiter to learn from. But the Transfer Committee and BR (not sure whether FSG are pulling some strings from behind the scenes) seem intent on only signing players with good re sale value, or older players who are on next to nothing.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed I full agree I love Xabi ! ! ! Cabaye would be just a man to fill the big gap haha

Agree0 Disagree0

I don`t know who`s faut it was BUT Alonso should Never have been sold in the first place. I would still take him back BUT really, that`s the past now and who says he would have come to us? He might have thought it`s NEVER good to go back to where you were successful. Who knows? However me might feel, we need to ove on and support thise who are here.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 17:09:30
I don't know why I'm even posting this but how close where we to getting Costa a couple of years ago?

Believable1 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - about 3 foot away..... Seriously we never agreed a fee with the club so not that close.}

I remember one of the eds saying if we had got costa, Luis would have been sold, maybe i'm wrong?

Agree0 Disagree2

{Ed002's Note - Costa was seen as a replacement for Suarez. It would never have been the case with having both.}

08 Oct 2014 18:56:46
Ed001

I am sure costa has only two foot. Which third foot you talking about? :-D ;-)

Agree2 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - his ex tells me otherwise Reet.....}

08 Oct 2014 19:32:53
He would've been the only thing close to replacing Suarez and played up top with Fallcow for Athletico. So gutted!

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 17:09:18
Like some regular posters on this site, I am no footballing expert. And maybe my question will expose my inferior knowledge but why did Mr Rogers change a winning footballing system to the mundane & monotonous mire we are playing now? Surely Luis Suarez' departure can't have changed the tactics this dramatically? And why can't we go back to last years system it can't make us any worse can it? I suppose what I am saying is why fix something when it isn't broke? Would love to get your feedback ED's 001, EMS, esteemed posters etc

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - I have no idea.}

How can we go from playing like Brazil circa 1970 World Cup to Roy friggin Hodgson in the space of 7 games? Has anybody asked Brendan that question?

Agree1 Disagree0

I'm going to have a go at answering.

We've been without the 2 pretty key players in last years attacking formation since Suarez left and Studge got injured. The fill in's aren't quick and nimble players that drop then run past their man, and run diagnols, but are power forwards, that drop deep, hold the ball and lay it off to the fullback and mids running forward.

Agree1 Disagree0

No one really knows outside of speculation, so my completely uninformed opinion would be BR doesn't feel we can outscore the competition to a victory without a top 2 of Sturridge and Balotelli. The Spurs game is the only one where we've had both and the only we've really played a more similar style to last year. For whatever reason, for me, he doesn't feel we can do the same otherwise so we play more conservative, possession-based play instead. Complete swag though, I really have no idea either.

Agree3 Disagree0

Without Suarez it makes a big difference to us up front. The constant menacing of defenders, pulling them all over the place, creating space for others. Not to mention theskill, the trickery! Very hard to replace, changes the whole dynamics of the team in my opinion.

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 21:13:53
There is some hard to please people, we lose one of the best players in the world, the best forward in G.B. is injured. What team would not struggle and bedding in New players. What if Breadan didn't buy anyone, he would have been slaughtered. Give the guy a chance, last season was like amazing great attacking football, and if Jamie C haven't retired a title.

Agree0 Disagree1

I appreciate what your saying Rover but your telling me that there's not an offensive player in world football that doesn't press like Suarez that didn't want to come to us? Someone in the mould of Kuyt. I appreciate Luis is once in a generation type player but i'm not having there's no players out there I just think it boils down to shoddy homework by Brendan and the committee. They took the plaudit's last season and they have to take the criticism this. And while where on the subject can someone tell me who this secret committee comprises of??

Agree2 Disagree0

BR tried to play two up top after sturridge got injured. Borini and Bellotelli, it didn't work without a quality player with great movement witch i think bellotelli needs beside him. If studge and muz both start expect the diamond and us being explosive again. PS we will nedd either Allen or Can back also for that extra spark in midfield, its either lieva or gerrard in DF both lying deep isn't good.

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 14:22:53
Greetings all,
Just like ask the Eds a quick question .

Given that we don't seem to have the strength in depth up front due to injuries & poor form .Do you see us adding a striker if we move players out in January?

My gut tells me no, but can't help think that we need a pacy cover for Sturridge .

Balo & Lambert seem to be simmillar in terms of movement & style but without sturridge we seem to have Andy Caroll levels of pace from the strikers.

Personally I think we have made our bed and now have to lie in it financially .

Believable2 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - no I don't expect a forward in January.}

The lack of goals has 100% been down to very poor build up play.

Hopefully the West Brom game kick starts the season and we get out of first gear. Blaming the strikers for a lack of service is about as useful as blaming a homeless man for an MP's expenses.

Agree5 Disagree5

Balotelli has missed some absolute sitters and isn't passing when he should. It's not just the build up play.

We can't go and buy another striker when we already have 6. 4 at the club and 2 on loan.

Agree4 Disagree1

08 Oct 2014 15:58:48
I am not blaming the strikers , although I do say they have not pulled up any trees this season.

The delivery is poor but look at the options that having 2 'big men' up top give us.

How many times have we seen runs in behind ? (which was a major feature of last season)

How effective are we at defending from the front ?

I am a fan of lambert and would love balotelli to improve his game to the required level for us as he has so much potential ,but tactically we are trying to play quick attacking football with players who are skilled at holding up play .

I think the balance of options we have is all wrong . Balotelli has had service this season ,its not been great but he has plenty of opportunities and has either made bad choices or shanked it.

Lambert for me was not fit enough at the start but showed last weekend that he has the desire and the ability to give Balotelli something to think about .

Ideally we would have had Remy but that didn't go through . I just think he was the kind of striker that could provide cover for the role that Sturridge plays .

There comes a point where you have to accept the system does not suit certain players so either adapt /change the system or the players its not brain surgery in my view.


I take your point about blaming a homeless man for an Mp's expenses being ridiculous .I would rather blame the system and that's what I am doing mate.

Agree2 Disagree1

08 Oct 2014 17:07:40
Could someone, Whers the money coming from?

Agree0 Disagree1

With danny back and once lambert and mario get a league goal, (can't be long for either of them), i think we will see things improve

Agree0 Disagree0

Bar the tottenham game and when he hit the bar vs everton, which was saved, balotelli hasn't missed sitter after sitter like mentioned.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Oct 2014 03:56:36
Was anyone seriously expecting goals? We all knew our Studge is made of glass.
Balotelli Lambert Borini!!? None of them are goal scorers where have you been for the last 5 years because you haven't been watching football these guys are not finishers. Sold the best player in the world 30+ goals and not even signed a goal scorer even though WE KNEW Danny will be injured 2/3 times a season

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Oct 2014 05:02:18
Dbol, that might be the dumbest statement ever. "None of them are goal scorers." Look up Balotelli and Lambert's stats for the last few seasons.

Agree1 Disagree1

09 Oct 2014 07:52:12
I did said this long time back and would repeate it again. Replacing planet best striker with lambert + Borini + Balletolli is simply not good enough.

Agree0 Disagree0

Fencey, the ''save'' was an absolute sitter.either put the boot through or place, it, he glanced it straight at howard, he also missed a piss easy header vs tottenham and another vs everton, he completely stuffed a shot when lloris was out of his goal, headed a 2 yard ball stright at lloris. .Don't make excuses, he's completely snatched at some chances.

Agree1 Disagree0

I said bar the tottenham games if you read it again! i doubt he could have done much else with the everton chance too.

Agree1 Disagree1

So we should just not include totenham then and blame it all on build up play? ignore his disctinctive hogging vs basel? etc

Agree0 Disagree0

Balo did his best on that shot but it wasn`t meant to be oh and by the way, Howard is NO slouch so some posts blaming him for missing a sitter is ludicrous (spelling).

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 12:12:54
Would just like to thank the eds they've been especially chatty the last couple of days and it makes the site much more enjoyable well done!:)

Believable3 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - thank you mate, it is just down to time.}

08 Oct 2014 11:01:49
After my chat with Harry about favourites, it got me thinking, who would be your first name on the teamsheet?
Easy for me. Henderson all day long.

Believable12 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - same for me.}

08 Oct 2014 11:47:30
Henderson for me too.

Agree4 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 12:01:57
I'd probably plump for Sturridge, given our recent goal-shyness, although Hendo would be next

Agree1 Disagree1

08 Oct 2014 12:35:15
Easy. Henderson.

Agree3 Disagree1

Hendo for me too

Agree0 Disagree0

Pretty easy, Glen Johnson!

Agree6 Disagree3

Dirk Kuyt.

Agree3 Disagree2

Lallana

Agree3 Disagree1

08 Oct 2014 13:58:16
Suso

Agree1 Disagree5

08 Oct 2014 15:41:13
Henderson slightly over Sterling

Agree0 Disagree0

Has to be Markovic hands down.

Agree2 Disagree2

Lallana/Sturridge.

Agree3 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 17:09:17
Welsh

Suarez on loan from Barca. Lols.

Agree0 Disagree3

Hendo at the minute but if lallana can keep up the work he's doing and have the same levels of intensity every game then I'd say both of then to start every possible game

Agree0 Disagree0

Gerrard .

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 09:42:57
Poll of the day on Downing:

1st season - let's be honest, it wasn't great. Dalglish saw Downings ability to cross and Carrolls height. Trouble is, Carroll is useless from open play because he is too slpw to get into the box to meet the cross! So poor Downing had bugger all to aim at. I do think Dalglish made Downing look bad. That is no excuse for zero goals and assists though. He was well off the pace.

2nd season - Downing was excellent. I know plenty will dispute that, but 5 goals and 8 assists in a pretty average team, with limited game time and even a short spell spent at left back os a very good return. Rodgers really got the best out of him and he should not have been sold for bloody Moses! Like it or not, in his last season, Downing was unspectacular but effective. He was also a hard worker which often went unnoticed. Rodgers made a mistake there. He is proving it this year at West Ham now he is settled in and has some proper forwards to aim at rather than big Andy and Carlton Cole!

I wish him luck.

Believable6 Unbelievable8

08 Oct 2014 09:57:27
I agree, he could easily be doing a job in midfield or on the wings for us now, probably not a starter but would have been a very useful option to have

Agree2 Disagree7

Hey there East!

I actually agree with you, in BR's second season Downing at last started to click. However, I do believe that selling him had nothing to do with footballing reasons, but rather with financial ones - mainly, this was the last year where we could get some money for him, and reduce the looming loss that would go into the accounts. BR probably didn't have a say in that - though he has proven that he is not much of a Downing fan. I wish all the best to Stu, but right now he is playing in a team and philosophy much more suited to his style. He would not fit into the fast, tricky and penetrating Liverpool we saw last year, he is simply a different type of player; considering that, his performance in his last year with us is quite pleasing, as he was trying to adapt to the new style.

Agree3 Disagree3

EMS
Downing was also played on the right rather than the left where I imagined he would be wipping balls in to Carroll
On the right he also cut back inside all the time rather than going past his man an putting in a good cross.
He has a great left foot so I found it strange he was predominantly played on the right.
He never really achieved what he could have done with us.

Agree3 Disagree3

King Kenny, was an person with regards to this. He very rarely started them together (when carroll was fit) He often used downing as a sub, or put suarez up front by himself when downing was on.

BR was moronic playing him left back, he did his best, but every time the winger abused his lack of defensive awareness.

He was one of our better players when he left and had improved massively and grown into the squad. we shouldn't have sold him, espcially since we never really had a wide left player last year and often put coutinho there and victor F*%£ing moses.

Agree3 Disagree5

The bar must not be very high for you guys when it comes to performances regarding Downing. He was aweful, lazy and showed a complete lack of passion and determination. He did improve BUT only after BR threatened to sell him. Unlike Hendo who grew a pair and is now co-captain, Downing just went thru the motions and he only "improved" because the bar was no longer high for him anymore in terms of expectations and knew he would be gone in the close season. For the money paid for him, he was aweful and WHU is and always will be his level.

Agree3 Disagree7

Redohio, you need to detach Downing the player from the ridiculous transfer fee we paid to land him. That was not his fault and he should not be judged against that when we are talking purely about his ability. I also think you've been extremely harsh on his work rate. If anything, he was trying too hard to impress. 5 goals and 8 assists for a wide player is actually very good btw. To put it into context, I remember reading that in the same season he achieved that, it was a better return than Nani, Giggs, Valencia, Welbeck and Young combined.

I agree he was not worth £20m, and I agree he is also not quite at the level required to start every week for a top 4 club. He is easily good enough to be a top 4 squad player though or a key player for a mid table side.

I think you've let emotions cloud your judgement mate. The question is, 'Was Downig just not good enough DURING his time at Liverpool?' His first season, well undisputably he was not. His second season though, he was one of the most effective midfielders in the league but he just idn't have the flair that makes people a fan/media favourite. Considering we were a 7th placed team, I'd say he was easily good enough for us that season. We may have out grown him now, but I think he would've been a very handy player to have last season. Especially considering how well suited he is to fast paced, direct, counter attacking football. It was playing in that sort of style at Middlesborough under McClaren and at Villa under O'Neil that put Downing into the spotlight.

He is far from a bad player and we needed somebody like him for depth last season (don't tell me you'd honestly rather have Moses, Aspas or Alberto). Okay, we would have little use for him now, but he was sold one season too early in my opinion and I would certainly not say he just wasn't good enough. Kenny made 3 bad signings; Carroll, Adam and Enrique. None of them were up to the required standard or fitness. Downing, Bellamy, Ibe, Henderson and Suarez were all pretty decent signings in the end. It may have taken Downing and Hendo a year to settle, but is that really uncommon? Compare that to Rodgers hit rate and it's actually bloody good!

Would I re-sign Downing? No. He is a bit old now and I think we could do better. Do i think Downing could've been the difference last season between winning and losing the title? Yes actually, I do. You need attacking depth and last season we had none of that.

Agree2 Disagree3

08 Oct 2014 13:34:43
Downing started very very well but went backwards fast much like enrique imo. Does anyone think Joe Cole could have been a great signing if it wasnt for his injurys & then getting sent off on debut? From there is was destined to fail but if it hadn't of happened he could have been good

Agree1 Disagree2

Downing had a good 2nd season with 5 goals and 8 assists like Adam says. I think he would have been a useful squad player, keeping in mind we replaced Downing with Moses, and then Moses with Markovic.

redohio: If that is your view on Downing, what is your opinion on Markovic?

Agree3 Disagree1

Yep, definately would have prefered him over Moses (even Aspas - maybe even Borini).

Agree3 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 17:11:30
After 2 poor seasons and struggling to get 1/4 th if the original fee. Some here think we did injustice with downing? ?

Agree1 Disagree0

Downing is just the type of player that can't handle big clubs. Look at it like the Roy Hodgson of players.

Agree0 Disagree0

EMS, I normally like readiing your posts But for now IMO, Downing was not good enough during his time here. NOTHING is clouding my judgement because I`ve known him since his debut at Boro. I saw almost every gae he played for lfc and frankly, only startedplaying well from Dec, 2012. Simply, He just did not have the cojones to play for a big club and so did Hendo in his 1st season. Diff is Hendo grew a pair and is now flourishing thru hard graft and determination. Sterling is another example of a player who grew up quicker because he had the work ethic and determination and awareness to stop his off-field antics and fous on football. At a big club, u either grow a pair an prove your worth or get shipped out. Period!
As for AG, I will not compare Downing who`s been playing in the EPL for near a decade w/ a young raw talent who`s only been here for two months because that`s just being unfair and disingenuous. At least give the boy the same period of time we gave Downing and hen make your decsion. on him. I think that`s fair.

Agree0 Disagree0

Simply Downing is a good player. Far better than what we tried to replace him with and is a squad player. Not consistent but can do a job. Not a starter but good to have around.

As for Markovic AG I think we need to give him time to judge him. He seems to improve every time he plays which is a good sign but he's young and needs time to settle.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Oct 2014 09:42:40
If people rate Downing, Then James Milner would be a world beater ( TBH, He is a fine player )

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 09:28:23
I'm probably preaching to the converted, but I do sometimes wonder why BR changed the formation of the team when Suarez left, when we have a ready made (if a little green) replacement in Sterling.

I would love to see Sterling in the Suarez role alongside Sturridge, when he is back, or indeed alongside Balotelli now.

Other recruits, like Moreno/Lovren/Maquillo/Lallana/Markovic, are upgrades/alternatives on existing positions in the same formation.

Maybe we will end up there in the near future.

Believable4 Unbelievable1

08 Oct 2014 12:48:48
I agree that we shouldn't change the shape of the team, but Sterling isn't close to being Suarez's replacement. We should've moved Sturridge there and bought an experienced finisher like Huntelaar to play up top.

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 13:18:17
Roger, I don't disagree about the experienced finisher as an addition, Huntelaar would've been welcome.

However, I disagree that Sturridge would do better in the Suarez role than Sterling. Sterling isn't the finished article yet, but in terms of balance, low centre of gravity, tricks and turns and flicks, he is much more a Suraez type of player than Sturridge. I would equate Sterling now to the Suarez we had in his first 15-20 games. Whether he can kick on and become a 30 goal a year player, I don't know, but I wouldn't bet against it.

Agree4 Disagree0

Guys I disagree, I think lallana is a better option in the suarez role, he doesn't lose the ball as easily as Sterling and his passing is much better. He has a wonderful shot, accurate too, great quick feet and hassles there defenders and keeper better than anyone.
I would play Lallana off Sturridge and see how he goes, think he would be gold.

Agree3 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 08:45:02
Ok i'm going on my high horse about player contracts. Sterling signed a new contact last year and now he looks like he's going to get another one based on his performances. Player power and all that but enough is enough.
I really do suggest that FIFA/Clubs take a strong stand on contracts or scrap them and go to a draft system.
I'd have whacked a £100m buyout clause on sterling and said that once he'd signed his contract there'll be no further negotiaions till there are 18-24 months left on the contract. If another club want you and want to give you 100k a week then there is a buyout clause for them to do so. Or you the player can buy out the remainder of your contract.
You were happy with 35k last year and you signed it for 5 years so its tough!
A couple of good games and clubs are being held to ransom.
I'm sick of it now like. I appreciate this isn't a well articulated arguement but its early!

Believable10 Unbelievable0

08 Oct 2014 09:20:47
Alex, don't worry about the articulation, that's not a bad word for so early in the morning!!

I completely agree. Since Bosman, the pendulum has swung almost completely in favour of the players. Its got to a point where it really depends on the attitude of the player whether a club can hang on to them at all - prime example being Suarez a year ago when he wanted to leave. A player with a different temperament probably would've got a move as he would've sulked or not performed (a la Tevez), but we were fortunate that Suarez loves football more than almost anything else, so was able to perform to an incredible level despite not getting the move he wanted.

However, players with that attitude are all too rare in this day and age.

Whether we call it a buyout clause or a minimum compensation clause or whatever, a club should be able to make a player honour their contract without being held to ransom. If a club then chooses to reward a player with an improved contract earlier than is necessary, that should be the clubs prerogative.

Agree4 Disagree1

08 Oct 2014 09:28:12
What a 19 year old will do with 100 k a week is beyond me

Agree9 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I have a few ideas for how I could look after his money for him......}

My rather radical view for football is that a wage cap should be introduced, even though it goes against the basic principles of the free market. The game is simply becoming a slave to money and commerce. A wage cap (including on all the bonuces, fees and etc) would reduce the bargaining power of rich clubs. Sometimes I also support the idea of one year contracts, because the money wasted on transfers is far too much - however, this will make small clubs far too vulnerable to the big clubs I guess. Still, football has deviated far too much from its roots.

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 10:36:40
The problem is, that as we stand now almost all clubs have massive financial investments in players that would be lost overnight if all contracts were honoured.
Values of clubs would drop dramatically and so would the shares, as clubs would be losing millions of pounds in assets.
The ideas great, but I fear we are further away than ever from seeing contracts honoured.

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 11:14:55
Dave, my thought was not that all contracts would be honoured, but that the clubs would benefit from protection from those contracts. Therefore, if they chose to sell a player during his contract, and the player agrees, then they can do so. However, players demanding massive pay rises (or rather their agents!) in the early stages of a long term contract should be curbed.

Agree2 Disagree0

A generous donation to the "The real AG appreciation society"?

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 17:13:29
Ree

The 19 year old has a child and 2 woman in his life. He could a lot with 100k.

Agree1 Disagree0

I think that there should be a system whereby contracts are negotiated in only one month in the year. So something like a June contract window. This will mean that season performances will be awarded, not just 5 games. Now this won't help the inflation in wages, but it will prevent players unable to get into the first team a way out without costing the club or their careers.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 08:03:18
Eds

just checked out the player ratings page. Looks cool. Great idea.
One query regarding the fantasy football league
If you use the player ratings wouldn't it be that people would deliberately give high ratings for players in their teams?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - the plan is that it will be an average rating overall will give bonus points if it is over a certain amount. So you would need to make hundreds of accounts to have any real effect and then only for a point or two anyway. Considering the prizes are not exactly going to be huge, it would seem unlikely anyone will go to all that effort!}

08 Oct 2014 08:23:59
Oh ;-)
It is my last chance at redemption as I am terrible at predicting scores and chose roman reigns in the wrestling fantasy league

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - hardly the last chance mate, we have a lot more games and competitions planned yet! Ed033 has a huge list of them to add to the sites over time.}

08 Oct 2014 08:49:35
I doubt I'll be around as will be going away for 2 years from the site next year

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - where are you going? 2 years is a long time mate.}

08 Oct 2014 09:01:33
To the himalayas to search for a magic herb for my immortality serum. Lol just kidding.
Actually I'll be going to a boarding school next year around may no phones there

Agree3 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - no phones? Wow, I never realised kids could survive without a phone glued to their hand at all times!}

08 Oct 2014 09:08:12
This kids more mature ed :-)

Agree4 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I wouldn't go that far......}

08 Oct 2014 09:25:43
Ouch ed

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm so jealous of you Reet. I wish I'd learned to board up windows when I was younger. My hostages probably wouldn't keep escaping!

Agree6 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 09:39:36
LOL ems

Agree0 Disagree0

How old are you Reet, if you don't mind me asking ( probably been asked before I imagine so apologies if it has. )

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 14:15:08
15, Marshy

Agree1 Disagree0

ED001, I would love to take Reet's role on ISL and the other Banter website till he is back.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed033's Note - ok RED INDIAN, i'll get back to you

08 Oct 2014 14:51:19
Red Indian

think you are getting a bit confused. I'll be going away next year not now ;-)

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Perhaps some assistance will help. The ISL site could get very busy.}

08 Oct 2014 06:47:19
We should not sign valdes and try for Chec in January ! ! !

Believable11 Unbelievable1

Please God spend the money and get Cech, for those wondering where the money is going to come from then sell Borini, take a drop in value if we have to as we are screwed if we don't get a great keeper on board soon.
He will be fantastic between the sticks, will organise and lash the defence and would be a wonderful role model for not only the keepers at the club but all the younger players, the guy has won so much and is a fantastic buy.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 01:53:20
Why are Liverpool after Valdes? I've never always rated him. Wouldn't Petr Cech be a better alternative?

Believable10 Unbelievable0

08 Oct 2014 04:37:20
He would be better but I also think he will cost a hefty transfer fee though the wages may be similar. :-(

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 04:45:30
As far as ability is concerned, I couldn't agree more. However, Valdes is a winner, a good distributor of the ball, and a free agent. I imagine his wages are much less than Cech's. His shot stopping would be the thing I'm worried about.

Agree0 Disagree0

Just raises more questions about our transfer policy. Just because he's a free agent we go for an ok keeper instead of a world class keeper. It is clear that, we have the worst keeper in the league and yet it is not being addressed seriously enough.

Agree1 Disagree7

Spot on Sumon, the transfer policy is an absolute disgrace.

Agree2 Disagree0

He is not the worst keeper in the league! Another ott post in my opinion.

Agree7 Disagree0

Does anyone seriously think Chelsea would sell Cech to us in January?

I don't think they'd even consider it for 1 minute.

Agree5 Disagree1

08 Oct 2014 07:49:15
Ken

certain people still believe that life's as easy as fifa

Agree4 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 08:00:56
Ken's right, they wouldn't sell him to us, which is a crying shame as he doesn't deserve to be a backup at his age.

Sumon is clearly deluded if he thinks Migs is the worst keeper in the league, just a good thing you put that at the end of your post otherwise I wouldn't have bothered reading it!

However, I do agree that our transfer decisions seem a little erratic to say the least! If BR wanted Begovic, and a good keeper is so essential for our style of play, I don't know why FSG didn't go for him at £18m seasons ago.

However, my take is that FSG will back the manager only once he has proven himself. BR did that last year and so they backed him to the tune of £100m+, whereas in the previous summer, he had a much smaller budget with which to fill a number of roles, and largely failed in that with Aspas and Alberto off on loan.

I do share most people's frustrations that we shouldn't be packing our ranks (and spending our money) on large quantities of players to make up the numbers, and instead should spend the money on 3-4 key roles that we needed, and then back fill from the academy.

Agree4 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - FSG did go for Begovic, but he rejected us!}

08 Oct 2014 09:22:46
Aww dammit, Ed001! Why destroy a perfectly coherent argument!!

*spits out dummy*

In which case, such a shame he didn't come to us, and what a major boost to Stoke fans that such an exceptional keeper is willing to stick with them, kudos to Begovic and Stoke

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - sorry mate, Begovic was the keeper Rodgers really wanted. Stoke are very lucky.}

That Valdes is rubbish ain't he. I mean when he looks back on his career with all the winners medals and memories of playing for one of the best teams in Europe it's clear he'll have loads of regrets.

To then have the chance to join an up and coming club with a little bit of a pedigree and add his vast but average experience and ability which could help them mature as a defensive unit and add some competition for places.

Well you know. The negative posts will come as no surprise to him at all. Maybe he should just go and sit in front of a mirror and have a long hard look at himself and ask where did it all go wrong.

Agree1 Disagree2

{Ed001's Note - to be fair, I could have won those medals as keeper with Barca, and I am useless in nets. Valdes has never shown any signs of being any more than an average keeper with good distribution.}

08 Oct 2014 10:06:11
Ed002 has always stated that Chelsea will not stand in the way of a player wanting to move on so i don't see that as an issue. How much would he cost? How much would he want? They would be the stumbling blocks in my opinion. Maybe if he was still there in the Summer? Maybe if we could sell Mignolet?

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 10:19:07
IR, I would imagine Chelsea would be looking at >£20m to sell him to another top PL team

Agree0 Disagree0

Alfie
Up and coming club!!
He's not going to Southampton is he?
I don't personally rate him but yes he has vast experience and has better distribution than Mignolet.
I do not think he is a better shot stopper or better on crosses though.
I always thought he was the weak link at Barca.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 10:41:38
Just what I was going to say Rover, although given Cechs Chelsea history, I can't see them standing in his way in terms of a transfer fee either.
They don't have anything to recoup as they owned Courtais anyway, and I'd imagine he's be let go for somewhat of a nominal fee as a thank you.
Wages and signing on fees would be the issue for sure, plus I'm sure if he were cheap, there wouldn't be many top clubs in Europe not going for him,

In any case, I think we've got Mignolet for the long haul,

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 11:14:51
If Chelsea ask £20 million for Cech I'll change my username to
'I love Harry Scousser'

Agree3 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 12:09:25
Dave, actually, I revise that figure! He's now entered the last 2 years of his contract.

Still reckon they'd be looking at >£10m for a move in January, but I would take that risk as I think Cech would be great for us, and I reckon if we do end up selling Migs in the near future, we should get back close to what we paid.

I'm guessing Cech would be looking for more money, tho.

Agree0 Disagree0

Arrow the whole post was a pi@s take mate. Why would someone with his experience want to join Liverpool? Because we are going places.

Ed. Thing is you could say the same about any goal keeper in any great team.

Great players make things look easy. We will see but he is a definate upgrade on Mings and might give him a kick up the rear. Though his confidence issues bother me.

Agree0 Disagree0

The amount of 'work' Valdes has had to do in the last 7 or so years behind that team is minimal, so it would be like picking up a 23 yo keeper!

Mind you, he could age quite quickly behind our back 4 !

Agree0 Disagree0

Why do people still rate begovic? Have you seen his performances over the past 2 seasons? He's been dreadful and at fault for a fair few stoke goals conceded

Migs had a great season before we bought him, just like begovic did when we went after him.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 00:33:58
Hello to all the EDS and fellow REDS

Badly needed win before the break. With the injured coming back we will regain the intensity of last year and shoot up the table. Never mind the doom and gloom merchants. One thing though, I thought with Glen at right back we had more balance and looked (surprisingly) safer. Manquillo has tonnes of potential but final ball is still a work in progress. Glen's assured defending (when he defends) and movement up front was missed these last games. I know he has his detractors (for want of a better word) but IMO he could be the best right back in PL, if he pulled his finger out.
Good days are just round the corner. AS LONG AS WE DON'T SUFFER ANYMORE INJURIES. I hope I don't jinx us now.
P.S. ManU 4th, they actually believe they're back! lol!!

Believable0 Unbelievable1

08 Oct 2014 05:08:00
Don't think anyone doubted GJs ability, have always thought he has the potential to be an amazing RB, but it has been his complete lack of application, desire, and focus over the past 18 months or so that I can't stand! Seeing him at anfield the few times I was lucky enough to go gave me a chance to see the whole pitch and how terribly exposed he left our defence and how little effort he made to get back. Have to be cynical but isn't coincidental he is putting effort in when he needs a new contract!

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 07:27:27
How any1 can take the Michael out of United, while claiming Johnson could be the best left back in the league is beyond me

Agree0 Disagree3

08 Oct 2014 07:53:52
Ctr

time for an eye checkup mate

Agree4 Disagree0

08 Oct 2014 09:43:13
Right back even lol thanks for pointing out my mistake dags2 😜

Agree1 Disagree0

 
Change Consent