Liverpool Banter Archive February 08 2016

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

08 Feb 2016 15:14:09
since FSG took control of the club over 5 years ago, they have slashed the wage bill, with the likes of Reina, Gerrard, Carragher, Torres, Kuyt, Maxi and Suarez all leaving to be replaced by much lower earners. I'd love to know the annual savings on the wage bill over this period, but it's clear to see that once that saving is offset against the sub-£25m transfer kitty FSG have provided every year, they haven't dug that deep into their own funds at all.
During the last 5 years, Liverpool's income has increased to stratospheric levels both from the increased TV money and from club-record sponsorship and commercial deals .

Believable4 Unbelievable6

08 Feb 2016 23:35:47
And The team is now worth nothing. We have probably Coutinho who is worth around 30 mil.
Nobody would pay even 20 for anybody else imo.
We need a Klopp miracle, maybe get some German talent in.


08 Feb 2016 23:39:46
J, was your expectations that they was going to come into a club riddled with debt with zero guarantee of success and throw all of there previously earned money into it and have nothing left for the other businesses. It's like buying a car from a sales man. Your going to hear what you want from him buying the motor. When it all costs you money at a later date. He's looking for his next pound to be earnt.
They are business men looking to earn money from the purchase of the club. I have no doubt they craved success in their tenure and still do but for our reasons on top of their own financial gain.

Been said so much by the Ed's on this page. We're years behind others when we should of been doing what we are now when Moores had the club! He fleeced us. Hicks and Gillete were a shambles and FSG are looking to earn a decent profit from us with success along the way.


08 Feb 2016 23:45:45
Slashed the wage bill?

FY 2007, staff costs of £77.6M
FY 2008, staff costs of £89.7M
FY 2009, staff costs of £96.1M
FY 2010, staff costs of £114.3M
FY 2011, staff costs of £128.8M
FY 2012, staff costs of £109.2M (10 month FY)
FY 2013, staff costs of £130.8M
FY 2014, staff costs of £143.7M

I certainly notice a trend and it's not negative.


08 Feb 2016 23:57:27
Im not sure the wage bill is lower at all. Anyone with any figures?


09 Feb 2016 00:29:27
J, mate.

You do remember FSG owned the club when we bought Suarez, right? They didn't inherit him and his wages and then offloaded him to make a saving on the wage bill as your post would seem to imply.

In the current squad, Firmino, Benteke, Henderson, Sturridge and Milner are all reportedly on £100k or over basic wage. Not to mention that we have the biggest first team squad that I can remember us having. I'd say that offsets any wage savings made by previous high-earners leaving.

And BR spent £93m nett just in transfer fees in three years (loan fees, signing on fees, agent fees etc. would all have to be added on), so sub-£25m a year transfer kitty is also wrong.

I'm not going to even bother going into the whole part where they bought a club running at a massive ongoing loss.


09 Feb 2016 01:48:22
It's just another "fan" spewing nonsense at the owners that they completely made up just to sound smart. It's pathetic really. Do you moaners read nothing on the site? 1
Million pounds lost per week for the first 3 years? Is that not registering upstairs?


09 Feb 2016 02:12:11
So J, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the owners? I don't follow what you're trying say - maybe because I believe your figures, assumptions and reasoning are wide of the mark. Income may have gone up, but so too has the expenditure. It has been made apparent on this site on many occasions, just how much money is being spent and that quite a lot of it was unnecessary expenditure incurred to appease fans. The owners have not been thrifty at all - they have been wasteful, but at least you can't say they haven't been supportive.


09 Feb 2016 03:00:27
Ridiculous post based on nothing but assumptions. Show some numbers to back up your fantasy.

FSG are owners acting in the best interests of the club, which is trying to be profitable. Would have rather them did what happened to Malaga? Come in, spend loads of money on players, earn one year of champions league and then leave the club to rot?

So sick of the whining.


09 Feb 2016 04:05:31
if we start selling our players we have 100 million worth of players to sell not including coutinho, but including benteke.


09 Feb 2016 04:25:31
Happy to see other posters have debunked some of the patently false crap being slung at FSG.

I'm not the biggest fan of FSG, but all of these claims that they're sucking money out of LFC to subsidize the Redsox are total baloney.

Look, the ticket price rise was a huge mistake and they're already in the process of reviewing it and changing course. And, they literally just signed us Klopp a few months ago, the first truly world class manager we've had since Rafa.

It is one thing is insist that ticket price increases are pricing out segments of the traditional fan base-- a fair point-- but quite another to act like self-entitled ****s, making false claims about under-spending.


08 Feb 2016 21:16:52
Eds I know you're saying there will be a lot of outs, and everyone has their opinions on who should go, most similar names. Is there any interest of players that the most of us wouldn't want to leave, I know it's few and far between haha.

Believable0 Unbelievable4

{Ed002's Note - Nope.}

08 Feb 2016 21:00:08
Question for you ED002, with phrases like "sceptic fans" and "worse fans by a mile" etc or comments about flat caps and rattles, why do you bother to answer questions or edit on the Liverpool pages? You clearly despise Liverpool fans so I'm just failing to understand why you would waste your time on people you don't like? Cheers!

Believable4 Unbelievable6

{Ed002's Note - I answer questions on the Liverpool page regarding transfers and general questions about the game. I certainly don't despise the fans I am simply being honest with my views. You come here simply to gather fodder to support the naive and child-like causes of the Spirit of Shankly - a group that seems determined to do nothing but damage the club - and oust the owners and the management. You will, no doubt, yet again get your way throwing the club in to further years of turmoil as you all strive toward the ultimate goal naive and child-like goal of club ownership (and the resultant complete destruction). If the folks really understood what the aim is I am sure they would see quite how septic some of the "fans" are.}

08 Feb 2016 22:40:48
Regardless of what ed02 says waro we are supporting what he or she says! .
Am sure ave seen posts from you relating to us proper fans and those so called fans. Don't get me wrong I understand your making a stand for the future of our kids grandkids or thinking of others as ed01 puts it. All in all this is looking like a huge attack on our owners who I generally believe have done nothing wrong.
In my opinion I believe these protests could of been done in a totally different way but hey that's my own opinion.
One thing I do know waro is that all the eds here put up with a lot of crap and abuse from our fans so you cannot blame them if they have some bad opinions of certain fans, abit like you and the owners or others that are running liverpool football club.
Waro what would you like ed02 to? Maybe just blank all us liverpool fans when asked questions. He repeatedly gets asked the same crap time and time agen so I wouldn't blame him if he did have an opinion of our fans although I believe he generally doesn't, but maybe just gets pissed of with some of the inebriated halfwits that don't seem to understand. Anyway a hope u achieve what you set out to, but let's lay of the owners.


08 Feb 2016 21:55:54
Well said 002.


08 Feb 2016 22:08:52
Insults again ED002, call it as you see it by all means, but name calling to make a point, you seem far more educated than that. I'm starting to think some us don't fit in with your capitalist ideology, and you use this as a platform to have a dig. I actually quite like you ed002 but sometimes I feel there's no need for the insults because we get your stance. Just wanted to get that off my chest. Cheers.


{Ed002's Note - I want to see Liverpool settle and do well, where as you and the waster in the Spirit of Shankly are celebrating the damage you are causing - hence the deletion of the other post you sent earlier. It is fundamentally wrong and I see no reason to be silent over the attempts of a group of radicalized individuals to deliberately damage Liverpool football club and then standby and watch you celebrate what you are doing. You don't come to the site for transfer news, you come to prey on the easily led. You are looking at causing turmoil here as you have done at the club - and you were clearly proud of it judging by your putrefactive post of celebration.}

08 Feb 2016 22:26:00
Well i for one want to see and hear points of views that i don't necessarily want to believe. I also find it strange Waro why you ask such a question now? You obviously don't like what you are reading, maybe a move to try and oust Ed002 from these pages? Maybe then you could brainwash more posters to your way of thinking? Its all about opinions Waro, you have to accept that, whether you like them or not.


08 Feb 2016 22:09:37
The club has damaged itself. Just listened to people who no a lot inside the club and sayin what a mess they've made of things . Someone said Ian Ayre cancelled the meeting today? And I think what a great job we done walkin out in Saturday . The media attention and the people who have backed us, media, players, ex players, other fans has been amazing . So big well done to all the fans who did .


09 Feb 2016 00:19:38
Waro how old are you why are you Been so childish and cyber bullying people into your way of thinking. ed02 is right this club needs stability and to be settled, Not to watch you celebrate when you tarnish this club, remember this is a banter and rumour site not a protest site for you to recruit for your protests.


09 Feb 2016 00:38:49
Ed002 might bash us a lot as fans but some of the posts I've seen on here can we honestly say he/ she is wrong? I for one however find it refreshing that an ed speaks thier mind such as ed001 and ed002 and says it how it is. i'd rather be told the truth about things as I am not in the know and like be educated by thier knowledge of how the club is being brought down or run by buffoons and imbeciles.


09 Feb 2016 00:38:49
Ed002 might bash us a lot as fans but some of the posts I've seen on here can we honestly say he/ she is wrong? I for one however find it refreshing that an ed speaks thier mind such as ed001 and ed002 and says it how it is. i'd rather be told the truth about things as I am not in the know and like be educated by thier knowledge of how the club is being brought down or run by buffoons and imbeciles.


09 Feb 2016 01:28:30
Leaving all the squabbling to one side for a minute:

IF the owners do intervene and do reverse the decision made by the club on the top price of tickets, I hope those who have labelled FSG mercenaries etc have the good grace to give them some credit.

I for one will, not because they have bowed to fan pressure, but because they are willing to accept when they might have made a misjudgement and are quick to act.


09 Feb 2016 02:24:58
correct and right edd 2. I've been visiting this site a long time now but less frequently as the time goes by, its so hard to read some of the stuff that these so called fans post. As u put it septic. I see klopp as a guy who wants to do his best owners that tbh guys just want the best for the club, there is no need for all the hate. I also think walking out of the game is a septic thing to do, if a protest is needed then do so at the office's or wherever the decisions are made because all you done really was walk out on our boys who by the way were on the verge of treating us to a comfortable win at home. Priorities first.


09 Feb 2016 03:11:42
Why are some so surprised by these initiatives? There are plenty of people who disapprove of the path the game of football is going down. Why should we continue to permit businesses to shape our lives and what we love? It's not as if said mentality's results in other areas justify unquestioning trust.

We all want success for the club because that is the only reward we wish for in return for our investments. Businesses don't operate on such principles and that is why we must be vigilant, inquisitive and bold. Let's be honest with ourselves, it's harder to reverse a bad decision after its effects than to stop it from happening in the first place.

On the subject of labels again, they have been used to incite irrational reactions from automatons since the advent of language. Only brainwashed people react predictably to them.

Keep posting Waro, there are those of us who agree with these efforts.


08 Feb 2016 20:56:59
A question for ed002 if you have the time. I know you've mentioned about the European league, which as of yet doesn't effect us. But, do you see that football will eventually implode with the ever increasing wages/ transfer fees? Or will the landscape change entirely with the European super clubs breaking away. I. e. All the money going into that rather than the teams left behind? Any information would be greatly appreciated.


Side note, will we ever get profiles of the eds? Be nice to know how you all get this mountain of knowledge.

Believable0 Unbelievable3

{Ed002's Note - The big money will go with the breakaway. The restructuring of leagues will level out transfer fees and wages at the lower tiers.}

08 Feb 2016 20:15:27
Just a quick post on the prices of the tickets, me and my family are what's regarded by some as day trippers or tourists going to see a match, I live in Ireland and don't get to matches as often as I would like due mainly to the fortune it costs to get to a match, took my son to anfield last Feb to see the city match and we had an absolute ball but we could have had a week in Spain for what it cost with the Euro - sterling exchange rate, I work in an ordinary job myself and it took ages to save for it and had to pay over the odds for tickets but we just didn't have the choice, they where by the way worth every penny, a good majority of the people around me where in the same boat and would have paid what was asked just to be there, people will always pay the money to be at anfield regardless of the cost.

Believable7 Unbelievable6

08 Feb 2016 20:29:36
And that's the reason why the prices have gone up.
Like it or not but it's simple supply and demand.
The club know they can fill the stadium pretty much despite the price of a ticket.
The owners would rather have a couple of million extra a year than care what the average fan (customer) wants.


{Ed001's Note - but they do not know any such thing. It was the reason they had to fire Rodgers, the seats were empty.}

08 Feb 2016 21:38:45
To be fair to ed001 there, I stopped going towards the end of BR time at the club.
So there was probably more.


08 Feb 2016 22:45:17
Good effort saving up and taking your son mate, i have never been to anfeild and will be having to save a fortune to go as i live in Australia but my son and i watch the home and away fans and have loads of respect for them spending there hard earned money on a ticket. My son and i will get there one day and enjoy a beer and banter along the way.


08 Feb 2016 21:39:03
Not sure I really follow, Ed001? Anfield has been at around 44k all league games this season?


{Ed001's Note - no it hasn't, attendances dropped just before Rodgers was sacked, there were a lot of empty seats.}

08 Feb 2016 19:17:10
I think the SoS group need to read up on the history. They are taking 'pieces' of what is known and remembered and putting together into an ideology. i think the way forward is balance between need for market forces and needs of the fans. the holy trinity might be a romantic idea, but it does actually make practical sense if we get it right.

BTW Shankly himself broke the club transfer record several times in his first season. His first record signing was an expensive flop. He also bought Ray Clemence, Yeats and blended with Callie and Smith. blend and balance.

It's always been a business but one that has to exist wihhinh the community and identify with it. We are a Global Powerhouse but we do sit on a genetic bed of footballers.

Believable9 Unbelievable11

08 Feb 2016 20:31:08
Good post lad.


08 Feb 2016 18:34:47
I have backed this protest 100%, and I still back the owners too.

In fairness, they are still learning, but at times of desperation and frustration, then certain people or establishments must feel the wrath of supporters.

I know many Utd supporters who felt this anguish much earlier than ourselves.

What did they do?

They spewed their tickets and created a spin-off club.

On principle though, should it ever have come to that?

No!

And that is why we should express our frustrations in the only way we see as an effective protest, otherwise, they will simply ignore us, only for the season ticket of the loyal veterans to be swallowed up by some rich kid desperate to be part of something they will never fundamentally understand.

Harsh reality but true.

Believable4 Unbelievable13

08 Feb 2016 20:24:05
But Football has changed. Gone are the days were players had to try pass the ball on pitch filled with mud.

Money has taken over the sport. The future generation of fans will not be those who wear a kit that is 30 years old. Unfortunately you have to move forward with the times otherwise you will be caught up in the past which majority of LFC fans still find themselves in which is quite sad.

FSG are not going to bend over for the fans. They do not have to whether we as fans like it or not. The day they sell the club will be the day we look back and see the good they actually did for this club by trying to create a sustainable future. All fair and well the ticket prices have pissed of many of those walked out at 77 minutes. It will be a case of either of either wasting your money by protesting and walking out at 77 minutes or having someone else take your seat who will be willing to cough up the money. Paying £77 and then walking out when the match is not even completed. You are just wasting your money anyway!

There is no way the situation is going to change unless the club has to worry about filling each and every seat at Anfield!


{Ed001's Note - they do have to, whatever crap may be spouted about the tickets always being sold, the truth is that they won't always be sold. The ground was half empty while Bodgers was in charge, that is why they acted.}

08 Feb 2016 20:39:30
Klopp might change that though mate. We all want the same thing, every fan, and that is to see this club lifting trophy after trophy like we did back in the days.

Going to take time to sort out this mess but even with a half filled stadium I do not think it will make FSG bend over. Having a half filled stadium hurts LFC, not FSG.


{Ed001's Note - how can anyone think that when they sacked Rodgers due to the stands emptying, not because of how crap he was?}

08 Feb 2016 20:50:54
But Rodgers is now in the past. Seeing a club win trophies attracts eyes. Appointing Klopp may well change things when you have to pay £77 to see your club at the top again.

FSG had no other option but to get rid of Rodgers as this club was going nowhere under his management.


{Ed001's Note - but you are missing the point, it shows how easily they could see crowds fall off if they are not careful. It is utter nonsense that the stands will be filled no matter what.}

08 Feb 2016 21:05:16
True but as the saying goes, you can take a horse to the water but cannot make it drink.

Once (and hopefully when) LFC start winning silverware again, seats will be filled which is surely what FSG are aiming at irrespective of ticket prices.

FSG will go to bed tonight, in fact every night hoping that their investment pays off. They are not going to sit and worry about individuals who are not willing to pay £77 to attend a match at Anfield. That is just the reality of the situation. You either pay it or watch the match on the tele at home or in the pub.


{Ed001's Note - why are you even bothering to comment? You are just ignoring facts, like that FSG have already admitted they are going to sit down and revisit the pricing for next season. So you are either ignorant, or just refusing to accept the truth that Anfield is not going to fill if they upset the fans. There are simply not enough day trippers, no matter how much some Liverpool fans kid on about the size of following, the money is not there for enough to come over every week to fill the ground. FSG know it. They have to keep a core of regular matchgoers or face seeing the stands look like a Man City home game.}

08 Feb 2016 21:21:16
I do not really follow the news so FSG revisiting ticket prices is new to me. Sorry about that. If that is the case then it actually shows that they do have some interest in the club and fans or customers as they would like to call us and hoping they stay on for longer than what they have planned for.

I do not think there can be any argument here that they have done more good than wrong for this club. Mistakes have been made but the club is in a much better position then what it was in recent times.


08 Feb 2016 18:32:47
Ed just about to get stuck in to"Men in White coats" and have ordered David Fairclough and Geoff Twentyman two books. Can't wait to read them all.

Believable0 Unbelievable5

{Ed001's Note - the one by Geoff Twentyman's son is well worth a read, not exciting but extremely informative.}

08 Feb 2016 18:51:59
Thanks Ed I'll look out for it. Ill Google it now.


{Ed001's Note - it might be the one you have ordered, secret diary of a scout or something it is called.}

08 Feb 2016 19:01:04
Yeah that's the one I ordered Ed, cheers mate.


{Ed001's Note - very interesting that one. Much more informative than any autobiography.}

08 Feb 2016 19:20:40
We should all get together soon with our smoking jackets on and do a book review. Waro or EMS could chair it.


08 Feb 2016 20:51:39
Just to throw my two pennies worth in Barry mate but any book by Michael Calvin are also a great read, especially the one about football scouts called "The Nowhere Men" and honestly a better read than Simon Hughes "Secret Dairy Of A Liverpool Scout", nevertheless still worth getting though.


{Ed001's Note - the difference is, the secret diary has real info, Michael Calvin's books are stories of the info. That may make them more entertaining, but that is all it is.}

08 Feb 2016 21:15:29
I must say its a great read. Also look at an epic swindle another good read

Crooky.


08 Feb 2016 22:58:26
I read the Epic Swindle mate. A story of two absolute jokers, a very scary read.


Afobe Fears Arsenal Title Collapse, Klopp Back At Work And Aston Villa Have Nothing To Lose Plus More

08 Feb 2016 17:58:18
{Ed's Note - We have posted a new article entitled, Afobe Fears Arsenal Title Collapse, Klopp Back At Work And Aston Villa Have Nothing To Lose Plus More

Believable1 Unbelievable0

08 Feb 2016 17:31:33
Lets hope with Sturridge back he can stay clear of injury. I no its a big ask but its good the wsy Klopp has managed him and made him train hard with ten days on the spin act. Hopefully he will be fit for rest if season and bang the goals in we miss.

Believable9 Unbelievable7

08 Feb 2016 16:56:37
If I could have a yarn in Klippertys ear I would tell him to sign Mahrez from Leicester, I think every Liverpool fan would be happy with him.

Believable11 Unbelievable8

08 Feb 2016 17:41:07
Him and kante are class acts.


08 Feb 2016 18:16:15
And why not Reus?


08 Feb 2016 18:36:28
I don't think we need new players until we have a settled team set up. We need to get our current crop organised better, we need to improve our tactical approach.

Bringing new players into a failing team rarely works for more than a few games.


08 Feb 2016 19:55:35
Ron, it's not like we are going to be getting players until the summer. Nothing much will change from now until then, unless we wait 2 or 3 seasons we won't improve under the current crop. It's no mystery that we need a new spine to the team. A new goalkeeper, centre back, midfielder and striker are necessities in the summer. With a lot of players leaving.

I understand we need stability, but in order to advance we need better quality players who have played for big clubs in big occasions. No use getting the small fishes anymore because they don't have the mentality to step up, that's why we have failed so badly. If recruitment improves then I'd rather risk stability after 2-3 seasons. Some of this current crop couldn't cut it at other midtable teams. No use shinning turds.


08 Feb 2016 22:10:59
Ron, we don't need new players?
We've got no keeper. No goal scorer. the worst defence in the league. Nobody can cross the ball.
We've got James Milner on massive wages.
And Jordan Henderson is the captain?
Mate we need players.


08 Feb 2016 23:01:27
Read the full sentence dbol.

Obviously we need a new keeper but it seems the 5yr contract has put paid to that.
As for the outfield players I said we need a settled team set up.
Bringing in players doesn't organise the defence or change the tactics of the team on and off the ball.

The team's system of playing is the main problem, not individual levels of ability. Leicester is the proof.


08 Feb 2016 23:49:33
Ron, I can agree with you to the end of the season. But i'd be looking for players now mate.
We're 9th because the majority of players are Mid table quality.
Tell you what tho, We need to stop playing 6 center midfielders/ number 10 type players in the team Ron. Lucas, Can, Hendo, Milner, Lallana and Firmino shouldn't be starting all together.
I'd die for a proper exciting winger it's been years.


09 Feb 2016 01:16:19
I think the back 4 could improve 30% with some good coaching and a new keeper would improve us 20%.

We are definitely struggling in midfield and it's because we move the ball so slowly and have too many players congesting the midfield.

I'd like to see us go back to the diamond formation we were successful with 2yrs ago and I believe we have the players:

Holding : Can/ Lucas
CM : Hendo and Coutinho / Milner and Allen/ Lallana
Tip : Ibe/ Teixeira
Strikers : Firmino and Sturridge / Ings and Origi.

Next season we will have Grujic and hopefully Markovic back also.


08 Feb 2016 16:28:50
I have to admit I am worried for our club

With both on and off field issues anything can happen, look at Leeds, Newcastle, blackburn.

Now I am not saying we will reach those extremes but you get my drift.

Our players are constantly bashed, and they must know it, look at Mignolet the bloke must be a jittering mess. Anfield is a morgue nowadays which shows little support even when winning.

The fans protests against the owners is getting louder, this is causing a real divide and unrest at the club as a whole.

We are playing like a mid table team, a defeat at the weekend and we are most likely bottom half!

With all this going on we will struggle to attract players. Who would want to come to us at the moment other than for money.

Klopp has a massive summer because if it goes wrong it will be a very long way back. The stats don't lie other then one freak season in rogers reign we have been sinking deeper and deeper.

I'm not sure what my exact point of this post is other then voicing my concerns. Does anybody feel the same way or am I being extreme?

Believable10 Unbelievable11

08 Feb 2016 17:39:11
If we drop Simon from squad I think we aren't that bad. Some stats (who scored, anfield chat) suggest he has lost us 15 points this season because of individual mistakes. Say if we had a de gea we would be second in the league while still massively underperforming. That says a lot. A keeper can't loose you 15 points in a season. It's unacceptable. Ppl bash him including ed because it is hurting us very very bad.


08 Feb 2016 17:48:19
Oh yea I wasn't defending mignolets form, he needs to be replaced no question. Maybe he was a bad example.
My point was fans are very much on the players backs at the moment and it must be effecting them.
Again in not saying the players should be praised regardless, my point was its all contributing to what is becoming an increasingly uncomfortable situation at anfield.


08 Feb 2016 17:49:06
Mignolet had cost us points by making basic mistakes that you would expect any keeper of reasonable ability to stop. He's let in the most goals from the least amount of shots faced. The stats and the facts prove he's a poor keeper. Not once since he has been here has he proved that he is anything more than a sub par keepers.


08 Feb 2016 18:06:19
I understand about negativity. But if we won against Sunderland or manu or arsenal or Norwich (earlier) or palace this season we would not so worried and bitching about our players day in day out. All games i can think of we lost/ drew because mignolet and dare I say we were the better team in these games. If we were in a CL spot no one would be ripping players. Yeah the ticket fiasco would be there but I dunno it won't be this negative. Unfortunately we can't help it because we only have ward. We hvnt been playing bad and just when it starts coming together a horrendous showing by migs screws it up for us. That destroys the morale of the fans and the players. Firmino couldn't believe he drew the game against Sunderland. His face was like what the f just happened. I single out mignolet. We need to drop him, at least for some games to get the pressure off him.


08 Feb 2016 18:11:59
The fans protests aren't necessarily at the owners, but that of the state of football in this country as a whole.

It's out of frustration as our beautiful game is dying.

IThis should be a collective protest throughout the country, and by the looks of it, other supporter clubs will continue the march to ticket fairness.


08 Feb 2016 18:15:39
I personally think ward should see out the season. If he makes a mistake it will be no worse then what migs is currently doing. Plus being an academy player will see ward get full support, something an expense signing such as migs won't get.


08 Feb 2016 18:26:12
And flanno should start the only scouse. If he's fit he should start. Nothing against clyne but flanno is local fans adore him and he ain't a bad player either. Adds to the atmosphere. We can see more of Smith, brannagan and tex too . I mean in epl this season is dead for us. Why not try some players that can help us in future and give us more accurate info on where we stand by the summer. This is a big summer, we have to be spot on with our outs and ins. And everyone knows that.


08 Feb 2016 18:28:12
My personal thoughts on the ticket pricing Davey is protests are correct but walking out of a match is wrong. If your there support your team for 90.
Protest before or after etc.
I would love all the fans of every club to come together and for one week nobody attends the games. Empty stadiums across the country would hit the premier league harder then anything else.


08 Feb 2016 18:30:25
We need a squad shake up and hopefully with a manager who has a clear vision and previous proven sucess, this summer is again an important one.

We are a mid table team, have been since and during Hodgsons reign. Apart from one mega season under Rodgers thanks to two world class forwards and Stevie still on top, we've been really lucky not to finish 9th/ 10th in seasons around that.

We wasted maybe £300 million in bad buys. Our squad overall should be better, it is on paper full of internationals, I had expected more when Klopp joined, but I'm happy to say There have been improvements in some players, he has had bad injury issues and none are his players.

One fear I have, which is why I'm not so supportive of walk outs. FSG. We've seen owners, like at Villa who have simply given up on the club, fallen out of interest and are not spending any more money. Keep walking out, turning against them but wanting more millions spent and I could see them just sitting tight banking on Klopps record of bring through kids and buying no-names, turning them into top level players. There is enough money in football for them not to lose out really and not have to spend to improve us.

We will have to see how well Spurs, West Ham improve with new stadiums. Leicester if they finish top four. Chelsea and Utd won't have seasons like this for much longer. We could be left behind if our owners take a disliking to walkouts and protests.


{Ed001's Note - Randy Lerner gave up on Villa because he got divorced and lost most of his money. Nothing to do with falling out of love with the club at all. It was purely his own personal issues that saw the plug pulled.}

08 Feb 2016 18:37:58
Agree with a lot of that carragold23.


08 Feb 2016 18:40:00
@23 Carra : Completely agree with you dude. Looks like things are going from bad to worse. I would tell people that this is the time to stay united and support the team but people don't understand the damage they do when they continuasly bash players and management on twitter and other internet forums.

It creates a feeling of discontentment which just seeps through everywhere.

P. S a special mention to those people who have led the campaign to bash Sturridge for not being fit. Now people are surprised when they hear that he wants to leave. It is not Sturridge's fault that he is injured or that the replacement - Benteke is out of form and confidence.

However I think if we string together some wins, things will turn back to normal. Otherwise get ready for horrid times ahead.


08 Feb 2016 18:40:37
Have you seen how much attention it has received Carra?

It has worked.

Other supporter groups are following suit, so it isn't necessarily a Liverpool thing.

This protest has legs mate, and I say this sincerely, that I hope that all supporters of other clubs do the same.

I guarantee that we will see many other clubs doing the same, and Liverpool supporters can hold their heads held high that they have had the bottle to instigate the movement in favour of football.

The stay behind lot though, will reap the rewards if it does change, which I can't help feel frustrated about.

Oh yeah, it has been raised in parliament also by the Southport MP.

Not effective?

I'm not sure about that.


08 Feb 2016 19:13:40
I never said it wasn't Effective Dave just not the way I would do things. However I have no problem with those that did I see 100% where they re coming from.
At the end of the day we all want the same thing and I am glad it has raised a response.


08 Feb 2016 14:50:29
Question for Ed 1 if he's around.

You stated earlier today (or yesterday) that you expect the club to be sold to Chinese owners next (the way things are going) .

My question is: Do you think that a change of ownership could lead to us getting back to (or closer to) our glory days?

As an aside, do you think we could learn something from the way Leicester have conducted their transfers this year or is it purely because they got lucky and struck gold with Mahrez and Vardy's form?

Thanks in advance.

Believable0 Unbelievable9

{Ed001's Note - it is impossible to say whether a change of ownership will help or hinder us, it really depends on if they get the right people on the football side in to help Klopp or not.

A lot can be learnt from Leicester, it is not luck, it is excellent scouting work, mostly Steve Walsh's doing, but we just need someone with a good eye like him to head up the scouting network.}

08 Feb 2016 15:58:40
A follow up question for you Ed01. Do you think a change of owners is needed?


{Ed001's Note - I would be happy for them to stay, if they start learning from their mistakes. Employ proper football people, rather than just divs like Comolli and Rodgers that just talk the talk while being utterly incapable of doing the job. If they see sense on this issue, then they would reunite the fans and club once more and it could be a recipe for great success.}

08 Feb 2016 16:07:32
I would keep the same owners and like Ed01 said add people who has a proven record in finding players which suit the manager and his system.


08 Feb 2016 16:17:14
Thanks for the reply Ed. Is there any evidence we are starting to make changes to our scouting?


{Ed002's Note - There have been significant changes already. The major changes have happened and it will be the occasional minor tweak hereafter.}

08 Feb 2016 16:33:49
Exactly Ed01. I think somehow it's a bit similar to the situations in some of other businesses or companies; they have good CEOs, GMs, Directors, but yet they employed bad leaders, supervisors, and managers. They weren't the ones who directly appointed these people, but decided on them based on recommendations and advices. It caused disharmony among the workers and the team members, underperforming, and ultimately causing the companies to further losses etc.

However, I have no idea how the club is being run by these owners. I just feel that they seems like a good one.


{Ed001's Note - sadly their lack of knowledge of the game is always going to be a problem. It is why they are constantly making the wrong appointments, as they do not know enough to say 'this guy talks crap' when they listen to Comolli or Brendan spout meaningless jargon. If they can get the right guy at the top of the tree, then he can sort out the wheat from the chaff and we will be fine.}

08 Feb 2016 16:35:03
I am available for the scouting job.


08 Feb 2016 17:08:14
Oh for another Geoff Twentyman Ed.


{Ed001's Note - if only! That man is the unsung hero of the club.}

08 Feb 2016 17:59:07
we need to buy players with a stronger mentality as well as talent. we have bought far to many softies. I never rated roy keanes playing ability but his arrogance and never say die attitude was brilliant. he even missed a cl final to make sure his team got through. I hope klopp can instill this in the younger players as a lot of the senior players are to old in the tooth to change. oh for another steve McMahon.


08 Feb 2016 15:20:53
Ed1/ Ed2, if you're around, could you give me your opinion on what will become of Sturridge? We seem to be relatively split as a fan base, one half saying get him fit and sell him, the other half thinking he'll carry us to glory when he eventually becomes healthy. Do you think he'll ever be able to stay fit and contribute consistently for us and England? Thanks in advance!

Believable0 Unbelievable6

{Ed002's Note - I suggested a few months ago that it would be appropriate for Liverpool to move him on. Obviously there was a lot of abuse. I have not changed my mind. I have no knowledge of whether he will get injured again.}

08 Feb 2016 15:37:54
Thanks Ed002, Would he have to get healthy for us to be able to move him on? I guess my question is, do you think we can move him on and make a "profit"?


{Ed002's Note - If he cannot pass a medical then there are few clubs who would touch him.}

08 Feb 2016 15:49:03
I'm in the move him on camp. Fantastic player, an absolute legend in that season with Suarez, but he doesn't play enough. If the price paid is near the £25m mark we'd be fools not too.

He reminds me in some ways of Michael Owen, injuries, maybe not come back to full fitness and play a full season and loves to play for England above all else.


08 Feb 2016 16:09:09
Max Renn

And what would you do with the money?


08 Feb 2016 18:33:27
And who in their right mind would pay 25mil after his last 18 months. He would need a sustained period injury free.


08 Feb 2016 18:42:33
there is always a fool ready to be parted with there money den82. you only have to look at our own transfer dealings.


08 Feb 2016 15:15:46
Danny ward must be ripping his heart out at not getting a game. Ray Clemence must be laughing his head off.

Believable9 Unbelievable5

08 Feb 2016 16:22:11
My blood boils every time I think about ending that loan deal. Pure stupidity comes to mind.


08 Feb 2016 18:24:25
It's getting silly this.

Do you not think the manager and his staff judge the player during training?

If he showed glimpses of being better than our current keeper, then they will play him. End of.


08 Feb 2016 19:07:35
I think klopps public support of mignolet and THAT 5 YEAR CONTRACT has made it difficult for klopp to dump migs. imo it would have been better if no deal had taken place and klopp had recalled ward and put him straight into the 1st team citing his Aberdeen form as the reason. as for trusting the staff is this the same staff we all think should be replaced?


08 Feb 2016 21:41:54
Davey that is a depressing thought have 3 bad keepers.


08 Feb 2016 15:09:42
getting away from the ticket prices/ owners debate, we have a massive game tomorrow night. imo its time to take the bubble wrap of Daniel sturridge he must start the match. I would also play firmino and ibe in a front 3.if we can't stop conceding goals we might as well try outscoring the opposition. I hope klopp gives the young lads who played in the 1st game another chance swapping clyne for Flanagan. if we need to save players for aston villa then boy we have got problems.

Believable4 Unbelievable2

08 Feb 2016 15:27:40
I would play a 4 1 2 1 2 with Benteke Sturridge and firminho in the number 10 role .


08 Feb 2016 14:35:22
Hey eds,
When is rossiter due back? And any updates on his contract?
Thanks.

Believable1 Unbelievable2

{Ed002's Note - (a) Very soon. (b) Nope.}

08 Feb 2016 14:25:24
good day

i understand that i'm not from liverpool so i don't understand the challengers being faced financially, however i am far from rich myself. i personally think that the tickets are still reasonable.

my real problem is that i haven't heard of any supporters club or fan jumping in and trying to help FSG when they had to pay a 1m pounds/ dollars to keep "the fans club" a float, FSG has made mistakes but personally i have no evidence to say that they do not care for this club. if i have to weigh things up FSG has done more good for LFC than then wrongs. so to turn on them instead of seek a compromise is an over reaction from fans. at the end of the day i agree with Ed02 that this is a business and no fan or supporters club will change that and the sooner we except that the better. i will not turn on FSG until there is enough evidence to do that.

sorry for the long post i might of got all of this wrong but if you disagree please say why.

Believable5 Unbelievable3

08 Feb 2016 15:17:43
I disagree, I don't think £77 for 90 minutes football is reasonable. On a one-off basis like a cup final or a big semi final it might be reasonable because it's a rare event.

For me this is not about FSG.

This is about the club and the people running it. They are expecting close to £40m EXTRA from TV money this summer. That's EXTRA to what they got for this season.

Where is that money going?
If the club want to increase the chances of locals coming in or they want cheaper tickets for youngsters then maybe use 5% of that EXTRA money to do that. Don't try and fleece the fans for it.

If that means we spend £2m less on transfers/ wages then so be it.


{Ed002's Note - The money is going to pay player wages, extend the ground, pay the police, pay staff wages, pay agents, pay super agents, pay transfer fees, pay bonuses to players, pay signing on fees, service vast debts, etc. etc.. Under threat to disruption to the Manchester City and Chelsea games from the septic end of the "supporters" the owners may well look to block the plans to reduce, freeze and increase certain ticket prices. I would expect further relationship changes and some gagging in respect of communication with the fans.}

08 Feb 2016 15:31:43
Thanks ed, out of that list you've given I'm sure the club can find at least £2m of savings to prevent the ticket price going up.


{Ed002's Note - That is not how it works. If you want to go down that route then the first saving would have to be the removal of the reductions that were planned for some tickets.}

08 Feb 2016 15:36:50
Well if that is the expected stance from the club ans owners. I expect a further deeper divide with more damage to pr et al. If there is no compromise this will be damaging to the image of the club for aure.


{Ed002's Note - You can't have it both ways. The septic supporter base want the owners out and the owners will be well aware of that.}

08 Feb 2016 15:46:34
Ed there are plenty of people who don't care who the owners are (me for one) but they still don't want an increase in ticket prices.
Why can't the club say "we're not going to spent as much on transfers and the savings go to the fans"?

It's like they're being held to ransom by Satellite TV to spend the money on transfers. To be honest, that would not surprise me.


{Ed002's Note - Nobody except the fans are making demands for transfers. All fans want their club to make signings - just that a large chunk of the Liverpool fans seem to want everyone replaced every year.}

08 Feb 2016 16:00:08
Ok I've said more than enough on this subject and taken up enough of ed002's time.

Cheers for that Ed002, you have been very helpful in my understanding.

I hope the club does reverse its position and I hope the club does start spending less on transfers. At the end of the day, fans do end up paying either through the turnstiles or through subscription viewing.
I also hope the current owners do stay, they will have learnt a lot and to throw that all away would be a waste.


{Ed002's Note - Have a great day Ron.}

08 Feb 2016 17:00:30
"Pay bonuses to players"? Eds 002.


{Ed002's Note - Yes.}

08 Feb 2016 16:04:59
if say a large proportion of the fans are unhappy with the quality of the players that have been acquired for the large amount of money we've parted with. The money that has spent under the likes of Benitez, dalglish and rodgers should have us competing in the top four consistently but as you know we're far from that! How much of that is down to the current owners and the transfer committee I don't know but what I find hard to understand is how other teams can go out and find gems without spending silly money. We on the other hand seem to pay over the odds for average players and players who'll never fit our style of play.


08 Feb 2016 14:08:13
Hey lfc fans

Quick question to the edsssss

Seeing as Mr Rodgers has been talking a lot for the last two weeks

Is the club run purely to win on the pitch or is it run more like a business to make money commercially and behind the scenes etc?

Believable0 Unbelievable3

{Ed001's Note - the latter.}

08 Feb 2016 15:20:50
But the owners will be aware that the latter improves if the former improves.


08 Feb 2016 15:41:27
Do the fans actually think FSG bought Liverpool solely to win games and trophies? This is big business, they bought the club to make money, and I think there is nothing wrong with that.

Had they spent money more wisely on transfers, managers, etc. We would probably be successful and the fans wouldn't be whining about every decision FSG makes.


08 Feb 2016 16:23:57
Well said manahawk.


08 Feb 2016 13:31:01
I don't mean to cause controversy but I wanted to make one point on the ticket prices.
The only time I went to anfield, I had to buy my tickets through a Thomas cook deal, and they stung me big time. I won't get into numbers but it was over double the £77 tickets.
I have no money per say, I work 40 hours a week and I earn £6.80 an hour, so I can't afford it anymore than most of you.

I'm really not defending the increase, I just wanted to point out some fans have a much harder time of getting tickets than others.

Believable3 Unbelievable3

{Ed001's Note - which is only compounded when the price of tickets increases.}

08 Feb 2016 12:38:26
Hi guys,
This is probably one for Ed01. With the protest at Saturday's game, is that the start of sustained pressure on the owners in the sense that even if they were to back down on the ticket prices and offer a more reasonable price that this doesn't end here? Is this just the tipping point for fan's frustration and even if ticket prices are resolved it is now a case of using the ticket protest as a platform to force the owners to address all the issues such as the general running of the club and transfer policies etc? In your opinion, is there a way to settle this with the owners if necessary changes were to be put in place to develop and sustain growth and success for the club or is it a case of burnt bridges and the owners just needing to go at this point?
Cheers for any info you have, it just seems like this is a very critical time for the club and I'm just trying to understand the scale of the situation a bit better.

Believable0 Unbelievable2

{Ed001's Note - no this is about broken promises regarding the ticket prices, the matchday fan just wants reasonable prices, for both home and away fans, as people seem to have forgotten how the away fans are fleeced too.}

08 Feb 2016 13:58:14
Short of FSG paying fans to attend games at Anfield nothing will placate Spirit of Shankly. They're run by hard left trade unionists and as ed002 says their goal is forcing out the owners. I'm sure they will have their wish soon and we can enjoy Massimo Cellino as lfc owner.


08 Feb 2016 14:58:56
They are also the same group that welcomed FSG with open arms after the Hicks and Gillette debacle.


08 Feb 2016 15:03:43
Nothing like distracting from the issue.


08 Feb 2016 12:15:28
Ed002, I thank you for having the view you have on the whole ticket price saga, as I completely agree. Both of the main Eds have differing views or at least ends to the argument, with both making rational arguments, which is only good for the site.

Believable0 Unbelievable4

{Ed002's Note - Thanks PD. I appreciate that Ed001 and I have different perspectives on this matter and he did eloquently explain (I will have to paraphrase as I don't remember the detail) that I am from the "brigade" that prefers their prawn sandwiches open on balep korkun with a sauce created from a lobster infusion and yangmei where as he aspires to be a poor chimney sweep. I support existentialism and he supports Liverpool. But critically, and joking apart, Ed001 does have a sensible perspective on this matter and does crave the club to be run well and does indeed want success for the club. And generally in that way we are not fundamentally different. I have a realistic view based on knowledge of where the game is going and that perhaps is where many of the Liverpool supporters are shying away. They don't want to accept that there will be change. But there will.}

08 Feb 2016 13:09:11
Is interesting, there seems to be a direct split on this site as a result. I must say, Ed002's remark about 'I don't get in trenches' did give me a laugh. I don't get to many games at all, so can't really say, but I don't think the owners are going anywhere soon.


08 Feb 2016 13:18:47
Given this forecast (and the irrepressible rise of the capitalist sporting paradigm) do you further forecast (and ironic scenario) whereby the pursuit of precious metal -fashioned into oversized buckets (often with handlebars) is rendered obsolete and anachronistic?


08 Feb 2016 12:07:02
Ok Ed001 mate regarding the on field issues what would be the first three that you would change if you could?

Believable2 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - Migs, Clyne and Moreno. With a keeper that useless, we will always concede as someone can just shoot and score every game. Clyne and Moreno are just hopeless defensively, neither cut out the crosses, neither offer anything other than decent pace.}

08 Feb 2016 12:51:47
So would you play Flanagan instead of Clyne and Smith instead of moreno?


08 Feb 2016 12:38:07
Again why was Wisdom never given a chance. What about staff wise? Would you be happy enough? Thanks for your replies Ed.


{Ed001's Note - Wisdom was just not rated by the staff at the time. Staff wise? John Achteberg has to be replaced, nice guy but he is simply not making any goalkeepers better.}

08 Feb 2016 13:27:08
Mignolet is the worst first choice keeper I have ever seen at the club, he doesn't appear to have any discernible footballing qualities, he is a poor shot stopper, he is poor in the air, poor on crosses, has poor positioning, has poor distribution and has poor distribution.

He is an immediate weak link that the opposition can exploit as there is an almost certainty that if you get a shot on target, it is likely to go in, that is how poor he is and the statistics back this up.

He was always this poor at Sunderland and I can't think for the life of me see what made us part with the thick end of £9m for him.


{Ed001's Note - oh come on that is not fair, he is not that good.....}

08 Feb 2016 13:29:05
Pace is nothing without end product.
Shame about Moreno and clyne I thought they had something about them.


08 Feb 2016 13:35:43
I definitely would, why not give the other lads a shot? Flanno and Smith have not put a foot wrong in any of the games they've played, Clyne and Moreno don't offer a lot going forward and zero defensively. Migs has cost us a lot of points, give Ward a go!


08 Feb 2016 15:47:50
There's nothing wrong with Clyne. We have not had a settled back 4 ever lately. I get the comments on some players but he'll be fine. Not everyone is world class at birth.

Moreno should play left wing with Smith at left back and Mignolet needs taking out of the team right now. Any player not performing needs dropping to up their game behind the scenes. If possible. If not sell him.


08 Feb 2016 17:28:02
But what qualifies moreno playing left wing? He has scored what, one goal and i can't remember the last time he created a goal for someone or put in a decent cross. He is even worse defensively as he is poor positionally, rash and wreckless. If real or any other spanish team came in for him i would snap their hand off. Smith is a more than adequate replacement as will gomez be next season.


08 Feb 2016 11:48:18
Hi eds, Scouting chief for leicester has joined arsenal. In view of this, is liverpool scoiting due for revamp? Some of the talents recommended has been horrendous.

Believable0 Unbelievable2

{Ed001's Note - what are you talking about Steve Walsh has not left Leicester, last I heard he rejected Arsenal. Ben Wrigglesworth is just a scout, he has joined Arsenal.

As for the rest, it does not affect us, we needed a change anyway, not because someone else changed theirs.}

08 Feb 2016 18:27:25
I guess its the whole liverpool management has to be revamped as other clubs are poaching good scouting talents which is root of success of football club.


07 Feb 2016 22:50:15
Ed01 and Ed02

Just for a bit of fun would love if you could answer this
Let's pretend Ed01 is Klopp
And Ed02 is Ian Ayre

No matter who's available or not in the footballing world
who would Klopp (Ed01) move on and bring in and please name your strongest 1st team lineup that you can come up with
Taking into account Ayre (Ed02) is involved in the selling and buying

Oh and there's no bias allowed for any current player and that includes Hendo etc
Not saying there is bias towards him or because he's El captain

So for our sanity what would the starting 11 be 1st game next season

Just to lighten the mood here as it's very grim at the moment considering everything that's happened recently.

Believable1 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - Ed02 is involved in the buying and selling? That would mean we would be stuck with all the ones in contract, as he would refuse to offload any in case they got offended by being considered unworthy ;-)

08 Feb 2016 12:34:03
Haha great reply 😂

Cheers for that mate.


08 Feb 2016 11:15:26
Relating to my other post can any one give me a good reason why they want the owners out.

Believable0 Unbelievable2

{Ed002's Note - Waro would be the one to answer this. Ask him who he wants to see owning and running the club and perhaps it will all be out in the open.}

08 Feb 2016 11:34:07
I want the owners out simply because they don't know football, and its hard to learn football when you're a 65 year old. This is purely investment for them, i'd rather have an Abrohamavic (sic) or one of the billionaire Arabs who has a genuine love of the game and our football club. TBH i'd rather have David Moores back at the club.


{Ed001's Note - for one, those 'Arabs' that you refer to often don't have a really genuine love of the game, they are just looking to create a good image for their country. As for Moores, you have to be either an absolute moron or so completely ignorant of how that prick is the one responsible for the mess the club is in that you can be excused. G&H's main issue was that they run out of money trying to fix the complete **** up of the club that Moores made, siphoning everything into his pockets instead of investing it in the club. We could have had a new stadium many years ago, but he refused to cut his salary or invest to pay for it.}

08 Feb 2016 11:39:59
I don't want the owners out.
I want them to sort the transfers. We sell our best players for big money, then buy rubbish players
It's not surprising were 9th with this lot we are Exactly where we belong if not punching.


08 Feb 2016 12:26:24
I was watching an old Episode of Chasing Classic Cars and who do I see sat in the front row of a Pebble Beach car auction? David Moores spending the millions he made out of LFC.


08 Feb 2016 12:49:10
I replied further down the page, my apologies.


08 Feb 2016 12:49:29
At what point has any of the Arab owners or Abramovich showed they have a 'genuine' love of the game. Maybe they do, but most likely it is a business investment. And as for Moores, the Ed summed it up perfectly.


{Ed002's Note - I think you are miles from correct here. Mr A has never seen it as a business investment. The "arab" owners didn't but have regrouped and have sold a decent part of their business on.}

08 Feb 2016 12:54:45
Dbol

I am sorry, But Owners doesn't pick the players mate. Managers are responsible for the players we bring in. If they knew the slightest about players, 90% of the players would have been not bought.


08 Feb 2016 13:23:08
For me, their biggest failure is employing the wrong people.
I don't buy into all this 'just an investment' thing that seems to be cropping up here at the moment.
Maybe it is/ was seen as an investment, but what are you expecting? Some Huyton born billionaire who's made some oil money and now wants to purchase the club he loves?

They've consistently poured money into the club and consistently failed to take anything from it.

On a final note from me on this, I am concerned that all this abuse of the owners will speed up any potential sale,
If they decide f*c* it, and sell up because of the abuse, I'm sure you'll all be banging your 'I told you so' drums, when up to this point, they have done everything asked or expected of them.
Kenny and Rodgers both had bags of money to spend, we're increasing the capacity of anfield and we've just signed Klopp.

So what more exactly are we expecting from them?


{Ed001's Note - we expect them to learn a lesson from their mistakes, instead of continually repeating the same ones over and over.}

08 Feb 2016 13:36:52
This one for transition who replied to a post of mine late last evening.
I am not saying only people from my background should go and watch Liverpool that would be silly. I'm saying there are generations of Liverpool supporters whether from the city or not (but of course mostly from the Liverpool area) that have followed the club with their parents and grandparents.
The current proposals aim to squeeze those people out as what was once affordable is becoming increasingly less so year on year. The club as Ed02 has stated are targeting to compete with greater amounts of corporate hospitality and match day package sales for the "relatively well off" new money supporters that are becoming interested in the game.
Attracting richer people in itself I have no issue with of course however to accommodate getting these people in the club will price people out of the seats they have occupied for 30, 40 years + as clearly those paying the most money want the best seats. Mr Ian Ayre is saying well there are £9 tickets and cheaper tickets but guess what only in the parts of the ground that mean the view is not as good.
So in my example my family will be priced out of seats in the main stand by the press box that have been season tickets for nearly 40 years. What the club are saying is well you can no longer afford to sit there so your elderly father-in-law who struggles with stairs (but has supported us for over 50 years) will have to make way for the rich bloke who can afford it and go and sit in the cheaper seats because otherwise the rich bloke and corporate hospitality won't be attracted unless they get the best on offer.
Why it's emotional blackmail is they know we love the club and want to continue to watch the team every week so they are asking us to beg, steal and borrow the funds together now to do so.
They are taking a big gamble mate as is football in general as if they price out the true diehard fans then one day the corporates get board and move on they will have nothing left, no TV money as the games won't be broadcast with empty stadia and then the game has fianlly imploded. Obviously they know that is unlikely whilst people with cash are waiting in the wings to pay up because football is "fashionable" but I and other people who go the game don't have to like or accept it without raising our objections.
I don't know your circumstances Transition, don't know how well off you are or how frequesntly you go the game but either money is no object to you or you don't quite get what's happening or you simply couldn't care less about the less priveleged LFC fans who go the game as their weekly release from hard work and their stressors.


08 Feb 2016 14:22:11
Transition. That's what I'm saying mate, I want them to wipe clean the entire transfer setup, shambles!
im not intelligent enough to suggest ideas, but it doesn't take a genius to work out a good player from a poor one.
Suarez = 40 goals. Sell him and buy lambert n Balotelli?
Where's the thinking here?
Buy Benteke when nobody in the squad can cross?
Let Gerrard go, most influential player in the last 20 years, don't replace him because we have Hendo?
The fans can see it, why can't the club.


08 Feb 2016 10:06:06
Hey ed02, I have a question for you, if you don't mind. The word "transition" has been flaunted around here quite often during BR's reign. I slowly started to appreciate your point - Rodgers' transitions happened way too often, involving a huge cost and a huge player turnover.
Now, you are often warning fans around here that if half the team is replaced once more during the summer (or the whole team, if you listen to some people), this would only lead to another period of instability.
I actually think that there is very good potential in this squad. I like most if not all of the players individually, and for me the problems stem mainly from some sort of misbalance in the entirety of the team, as well as some players either still developing (gods, Moreno, such potential, level your head lad), or not fitting with the Klopp style.
So, getting to the point - what is your prognosis? How will Klopp act in the summer? Will we have to brace for another "transition", or will he manage to avoid it, developing the existing potential with only a few additions?
Cheers!

Believable0 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - I expect that there will be a fair number of changes but the critical thing is to decide early what to do with the sheer mass of players the club has. What will happen with the likes of Markovic and Balotelli? Teixeira clearly has no future - will he move on? How will Grujic be used? Then you have the situation with the owners and the Spirit of Shankly effectively threatening the club now (the reality being they want the owners gone of course - and I guess only their Liverpudlian gang members invited to games).

08 Feb 2016 10:30:59
Ed02, Mate y don't you do a podcast on this? I mean your opinion on the whole saga? I would strongly recommend you mate.


{Ed002's Note - It would be an interesting thing to Harry but I will keep my podcast plans as they are.}

08 Feb 2016 10:54:58
I ll wait to hear from you mate. Add the Ticket pricing and ABUSE towards owners in the list.


08 Feb 2016 11:13:31
Don't usually agree with ed002 but it is spot on about Spirit of Shankly holding the club to ransom. They did the same - or tried to - when one of their number was banned for abusing a disabled fan and they're doing the same now. It is about pushing out the American owners and their desire for influence.


08 Feb 2016 11:35:35
I still think £77 for a ticket is ridiculous though.


{Ed001's Note - because it is ridiculous. You have to have more money than sense to not think that way.}

08 Feb 2016 12:03:10
When businesses show no consideration for people then we the people have the right and obligation to pool our voices and take collective action so as to alter the situation. This method has worked successfully in the past and is one of the reasons we have Juergen Klopp as our manager.

Labeling people making an effort to the benefit of all of the club's supporters as gang members does not discredit them nor their efforts, it simply indicates that businesses and business minded people would rather have automaton customers rather than having to cater to (free thinking) people. FSG should be as patient as the supporters, who have been investing their hard earned money into the club for much longer, for their return. The club will be successful in the long term and we need owners who are in it for as long and who share in our love for the club and the game.

Lastly, we should not be scared into submission as the club has no shackles from which FSG can pick it up and walk away with it. Liverpool was built and is sustained by the love of supporters for the sport and the city, not as an investment option for money men. Real power as always is in the hands of we the people and there it shall remain unless we surrender it.


08 Feb 2016 12:23:35
I think this topic of conversation is getting a bit tiresome now. We are all interested in supporting our team, turning on each other doesn't help. SoS have done a lot of good in trying to help travelling fans and the local residence around Anfield. It's not just a group of militant Liverpudlians flexing their muscles, they have groups in London Norway Ireland Sweden. I am not a member, but I am not against them voicing there opinion. I am a season ticket holder in the main stand and I stayed in my seat. Nobody who walked out on 77minutes abused me for not following them.


08 Feb 2016 12:46:01
Purely because there American, I'm xenophobic don't you know. Keep it coming with the propaganda toward SOS, it's embarrassing really, when all else fails look to demonise a section of society so everyone takes there eyes of the real villains who operate in the shadows, it's as old as the pyramids, luckily some of us aren't so stupid.


08 Feb 2016 13:05:39
Ed02, Could we have seperate page for Waro, Very much like Macca rumors?


{Ed002's Note - No.}

08 Feb 2016 09:08:41
It seems to be a funny time at the moment for us as we are getting mixed results, but I really think this is typical give the changes everybody has had to embrace, and the new philosophies being instilled etc.

I respect that everybody has, and is entitled to their own opinion, but I do feel that recently some (and let me state some and not all) of our fans are super critical and perhaps not as patient as they could be. It gets to a point when slating players performance and mistakes can create such a negative energy even directly in the stadium that we end up putting a ridiculous amount of additional pressure on the players not to mess up - which ironically probably helps escalate to silly mistakes etc.

We all have our opinions on players but for me, as long as they wear the red shirt we should only be vocal about our pure support and compassion for them - creating an environment where they enjoy playing in front of fans who truly believe in them.

I mean reading some of the posts on here on recent weeks - could you imagine if any of the players have seen them - having low confidence already, reading some of the harsh posts would completely kill their confidence!

I say we embrace the change and start emanating the message - if you go out there and play for the shirt and give it your all, we can forgive minor mistakes knowing that we are on the long road to better things.

Sorry to go on about it.

Believable4 Unbelievable0

08 Feb 2016 10:21:45
FSG were stunned after being called GREEDY BASTARDS by so called the BEST FANS in the world inside their stadium.


08 Feb 2016 10:41:28
Good, job done then wasn't it Harry.


{Ed002's Note - And who do you think would make good owners?}

08 Feb 2016 10:54:09
Not saying they are or are not good owners, just saying they got this one wrong.


{Ed002's Note - You will be one of the regular working class folk who will go to games to buy one of the tiny percentage of top priced tickets then?}

08 Feb 2016 10:57:30
Well Ed02, A good owner is someone who listen to all the crap we spout and Buy One Lionel Messi every 6 months may be.

And Boy did they not listen to people? Yes they did. From Kenny to Klopp they kept the emotions flowing as well as MONEY. Now people need a new face.


08 Feb 2016 11:01:03
Whats your point Ed? I am in the Kop so I get a relatively reasonable y priced season ticket. And for your info, yes I am working class, I am a local business owner of 30 years plus.


{Ed002's Note - So you are one of those bleating about something that is no relevance to them at all. The whole thing is about getting the owners out and not about the tickets.}

08 Feb 2016 11:02:19
It might be a tiny percentage Ed but £77 isn't affordable.

I don't think many of the ticket prices are affordable at the club.

Personally I like FSG, I think they've done a brilliant job at dragging us out of the dark ages and taken many a financial hit and abusive hit from the fans. However, I think they're being misguided by Ian Ayre who clearly doesn't understand your average footy fan.

The atmosphere will continue to diminish if the ticket prices continue to rise.

Continue to push the commercial aspect of the club, sell the naming rights to the club, do whatever to protect the fans being able to make it to the games.


{Ed002's Note - These are the highest price tickets and they are affordable, and the seats won't sit empty.}

08 Feb 2016 11:02:25
And Ed, yes the £77 tickets are a tiny percentage, what about the £75 tickets?


{Ed002's Note - You mean the cheap tickets?}

08 Feb 2016 11:17:16
Cheap is a subjective word. I suspect you're correct though and the tickets won't go to waste. Unfortunately some people will just pay it because they can, Turkeys voting for Christmas.


{Ed002's Note - History is that locals would go, and take their children and stand watching the game on Saturday afternoons. Everyone would then head to the pub or club on a Saturday evening and play the game again. And this happened well in to the 1970s I am sure. I understand that now it is much more difficult and the onset of the money coming in, games being televised, internet streams being available, kids wanting to play on their Playstations etc. have had a big impact.

Like it or not, these changes have a tiered impact across the English game. In central London you have far more transient residents than elsewhere, so the demographics of the likes of the prawn sandwich laden Chelsea change regularly – people come and go, but they have the disposable income to go to games. Next year they will be working in Hong Kong and others will be taking their place. Without going too far from central London there is a lesser impact on other London clubs that draw their fans from suburbia and the home counties (Hertfordshire in the case of Arsenal and Spurs for example). The same is true for clubs from areas of London with a more stable population (Millwall and Charlton are good examples). Once you move out to the larger regional cities like Liverpool and Manchester there is, as I am sure you see everyday, new money coming in and that has a knock on effect on the local community, the cost of tickets to games etc.. Liverpool are a very big draw and whilst the club will be doing better during the times of new money it will be to some extent at the expense of the locals. The draw that they are as clubs will always see the likes of Liverpool and Manchester United pull in the visitors, many of which will be ardent fans, and clubs will always put aside a proportion of tickets (or perhaps packages) to sell to those visiting fans.

If you then go out to the regions you will see a much more stable population, no or little new money coming in and clubs who are generally suffering the effects of a flat economy. But if the locals can afford it, they will have no problems getting tickets to the games.

Whilst I have a lot of sympathy for folks like the local Liverpool supporters, your chums and your kids who are caught up in this, I am afraid the situation will not improve. This is the nature of the “business”, and I use that word deliberately instead of “sport”. It would be naive to think that the increase in capacity at Anfield will see those tickets freed up for locals as season tickets costing, say, £1k per year. Taking account of the additional administration costs, the costs of policing etc., it would be a futile investment for such a small annual return. The solution for the owners is corporate sales and tickets – assign some of the new seats to season tickets, but improve and increase the corporate match day facilities to get more income. They know already that they cannot charge the same corporate prices that the London clubs and Manchester United do, but they will seek to get the best return in their investment that they can – and like it or not, it won’t be to the benefit of the local supporters.

This is something I am very well aware of, probably a lot more than you realise, and you will see a continued change in the paradigm of the game at the highest level. I have a buddy who has rued the passing of the game in his eyes and he has often recounted stories of his grandfather taking him to games as a child in the early 1960s. He has recounted stories of his grandfather’s penchant for violence to the fans of the opposition and how he was living in a segregated society even at that time. Sad, but the way it is.}

08 Feb 2016 11:21:11
Affordable is relative isn't it Ed.

No I don't mean cheap, I did mean cheaper however, but only a "tiny percentage" cheaper to use your words.


{Ed002's Note - Yes, affordable is subjective. If the poor folks who cannot afford the most expensive tickets why would they be interested in them? Why not go and buy the cheap tickets like yours?}

08 Feb 2016 11:25:09
I was chanting on Saturday, I didn't walk out though.
My chant was not directed at the owners. I am mature enough to realise that John Henry probably didn't make the decision to raise ticket prices to £77.
My chant was directed at those who did make the call and whether £77 is affordable or not, I still maintain that this is PURE GREED.
It may not be FSG specifically but it is greed by everyone involved in the decision.


{Ed002's Note - Of course it is not greed. You are being misled by the so called "supporter groups" like the Spirit of Shankly who are simply looking at ways to try and force the owners out.}

08 Feb 2016 11:31:54
Im confused How is 77 not affordable?


08 Feb 2016 11:42:18
Its awfully sad and as you say, the club have to justify costs. We ask for the big spending on players, the stadia extension and unfortunately there has to be some give. That is clear, they are operating the ‘business’ and transforming it into corporate to gain sustainability, eventually prop us up for sale and make the club a attractive proposition for any potential buyer. A potential buyer won't be interested in the £35 seats they will want more executive tickets as it makes them more pennies.

i'm not agreeing to it, I’d rather us not spend the amounts we have done and be able to watch the game at a reasonable price but it doesn’t work like that anymore as you say. Liverpool is a cruel contradiction, we spend with the big boys but don’t have the on-field success to back it up so now have to find a way justifying the expenditure. The team play bad and we pay more, that's the cruel situation and its down to poor decision making and being bad advise nothing else.

The only other way it would have worked is if we ground shared with Everton or if Example Coca Cola put a sum up for a new stadium and had full naming rights. Then we ‘might’ have had a better pricing structure like the Allianz have with Bayern (albeit maybe not quite as affordable as they offer but certainly better than what’s being proposed now) .


{Ed001's Note - sorry but tickets are an irrelevance, the money brought in is simply never going to make any real difference. We don't need to spend on overpriced players, we just need a club to be run well. The running of the club is the problem, that is what is putting it in debt. We just need to buy well, not spend big.}

08 Feb 2016 11:57:29
Your all missing the point 2 years ago Fsg said they won't put up the tickets prices what are the doing you tell me.


08 Feb 2016 11:35:04
Ed02,On your reply mate, Do you welcome such changes? Do you think this will enable clubs to be more self sufficient in future or would you want to stick to the old?
I mean the club or the sport or call it as a business, It needs money.
Is it one reason that hold People to buy a club considering its geographical location and how much it could recoup?

Thanks in advance for the repl mate.


{Ed002's Note - The is an inevitability about the changes that are happening. From my perspective the club needs sustained, manageable and continuous growth to be able to be considered at the highest level as a team worthy of challenging regularly for the Premier League and in Europe. That is never going to be easy to achieve by changing the team every season.}

08 Feb 2016 11:37:44
Ok ed, if it is not greed then what is the reason?
Genuine question because I can't work out why they would do it?


{Ed002's Note - The club loses money hand over fist and has very significant debts that are increasing further to cover work on the stadium. The club needs income.}

08 Feb 2016 11:40:23
{Ed002's Note - So you are one of those bleating about something that is no relevance to them at all. The whole thing is about getting the owners out and not about the tickets. }

Ed, are you saying that because I have a relatively reasonably priced
ticket that it is of no relevance to me? For me it is not about getting the owners out at all, and also, I wouldn't like to be in the trenches with you.


{Ed002's Note - The whole SOS (the folks behind this and other planned disruption) model is about something entirely different - it is not about the prices of the most expensive tickets at Liverpool - it is about forcing the owners out. Nothing else.

I don't get in to trenches by the way.}

08 Feb 2016 12:14:26
Note, that's what we should be doing but are currently not doing. I believe the increases will generate 2.1 million per year (roughly) as you say not big figures at all in the grand scheme of things. What I meant is the co-prorate side of things which is clearly being pushed.


08 Feb 2016 12:33:12
You missed ER out Ed02, and maybe the poor folk can't get a cheapER ticket because all the other poor folk have got them first and club have increased the price of thousands of other tickets.
By the way Ed02, I appreciate you not resorting to abuse/ insults, I must be honest I have been waiting for it.


08 Feb 2016 12:30:23
Ed thank you for that long response on the reality of its a business. I remember growing up here in the states and going to any sporting event in the NY area and it no being crazy over priced. Now I can't even consider going to any of the games ( not that I would want to) . The cost of a Yankee game from toll $15, parking $25-$50 to tickets I believe now range from $50-$1000 per game per seat. Forget the luxury boxes!


08 Feb 2016 12:39:16
Thanks for the reply ed I appreciate your perspective.

I'm no business guru but from my point of view the club needs to look at income v expenditure.

Income is increasing, massively, through the new TV deal. I appreciate some of the debts are related to the new stadium expansion.
Why isn't the club looking at expenditure? Some of the players need to be sold and reducing expenditure would have a much bigger effect on the debt than an extra £2m per year in ticket prices.


{Ed002's Note - The club is looking at expenditure and you don't want to start comparing the cost of players against ticket sales.}

08 Feb 2016 12:40:57
EDs who do the spirit of shankley want to take over?


{Ed002's Note - That is their eventual aim Lloyd - obviously it is never going to happen.}

08 Feb 2016 15:29:09
Crookie. There is people everywhere making damn all money. £77 is a lot of money to some people including myself.


08 Feb 2016 08:54:40
Morning Eds and Reds,

Eds just wanted to pick your brain a bit,

In your opinion what do you think Klopp is thinking at the moment?

1. Do you reckon he new the magnitude of the job when he took it, As in do you think he thought it would be easier then it has been so far?

2. Do you think the league is still a priority for him or do you reckon he is just concentrating on the cups and just writing of this season?

3. What do you think his plans will be this summer? Judging on recent performance there is only maybe 1/ 2 players i would keep personally, Do you reckon there will be a massive clearout and restart all over again, using the funds of sales and whatever budget is there to rebuild or just add 1 or 2 quality players?

I know its impossible to know for sure in this moment ;-) but I just wanted your opinion of what you think would happen,
Thanks in advance for any answers you can give.

Dev.

Believable0 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - The latest news about Klipperty is that he is in bed recovering, eating porridge and is having the hair on the soles of his feet combed. Tough to know what he is thinking. (1) The expectations of the fans was that he was the superhero who would come in and win every game from get go. The reality is that he is a good manager who won a few things a number of years ago but is far from what the fans elevate him to be. So much of the "magnitude" is down to unrealistic expectations not being met. (2) If every game is not a priority then he has to go immediately. (3) He came in to work with the players at the club and within the structure the club has in place. There will be changes in the summer but they are not going to replace all 40 first team players the club has on the books.}

08 Feb 2016 09:35:34
Thanks for the reply ed,

I have to say i agree, Many people seen Klopp as the mesiah who would save us all, the reality is while he maybe a better manager then rodgers he isn't a miracle worker and can only work with what he has, that said will he be sitting down in 4 years times with a premier league trophy who knows.
Who would have thought leicester would be where they are now?

Regarding point 2 ed, I get what your saying i guess i was just hoping there was some reason why our league form has been so bad, I know this goes against what i just said, but i can't help feeling if rodgers was still in charge we would be further up the table, i'm only 25 but in those years of watching liverpool this has to be the worst I've seen any liverpool team play and our league form reflects that even if the cup competitions dont.


{Ed002's Note - In four years time Klipperty will be sitting down to a mid morning snack in Munich.}

08 Feb 2016 09:51:16
Well said ed it really is about fans expectations, i mean a football supporter always wants there team to do well and i never want Liverpool to lose but over the years ill learnt not to expect so much and more about supporting the players and club at whatever position we may be in. love this game,90 mins can bring out every emotion i have.


08 Feb 2016 10:25:51
We are the only set of supporters in this universe who write off the league as early as december to suit their own ridiculous exuses. No wonder y we are called " Next year is our year. "
There are 15 games left and how about trying to get 45 points in those?


08 Feb 2016 10:34:43
Ed02, in 2 replies in quick succession (see below) you seem to doubt Klipperty, as you call him, by saying he is a "good" manager yet seem certain he will be at Bayern in 4 years. I know you don't mention Bayern but it's obvious that's what you mean.
Don't you think Bayern will be looking for something better than a good manager?

"The reality is that he is a good manager who won a few things a number of years ago but is far from what the fans elevate him to be".

"In four years time Klipperty will be sitting down to a mid morning snack in Munich".


{Ed002's Note - What do you see as being incorrect there? Klipperty is indeed a good manager. Klipperty did win some trophys a few years ago. Bayern did want Klipperty for this coming summer but Guardiola screwed them around. Bayern will return for Klipperty in 2019. Or are you just saying Klipperty is not good enough for Bayern Munich.}

08 Feb 2016 11:02:49
You can barely plan for next week in football so goodness knows how you can forsee something happening in 4 years. A lot can happen within that time. You may find ‘Klipperty’ in Beijing at the Bombay Banquet in 4 years time tucking into a little Hoisin Duck. Who knows, maybe Thomas Tuchel will get the nod from Bayern? Maybe Brendan Rodgers? Graeme Souness even?


08 Feb 2016 10:57:16
Incorrect, where did I mention that Ed? You described Klopp as a good manager, I asked don't you think Bayern would aim higher than good? I have yet to give my opinion on Klopp at Liverpool never mind at Bayern.


08 Feb 2016 11:02:49
You can barely plan for next week in football so goodness knows how you can forsee something happening in 4 years. A lot can happen within that time. You may find ‘Klipperty’ in Beijing at the Bombay Banquet in 4 years time tucking into a little Hoisin Duck. Who knows, maybe Thomas Tuchel will get the nod from Bayern? Maybe Brendan Rodgers? Graeme Souness even?


{Ed002's Note - You let me know if it doesn't happen then.}

08 Feb 2016 11:25:09
Not out to hunt you down or prove you wrong. You’re a intelligent person, I think you know what my point is.


{Ed002's Note - I have no idea what your point is. Sorry.}

08 Feb 2016 11:30:39
"In four years time Klipperty will be sitting down to a mid morning snack in Munich" 😆

Will Kirikou be his guest after he's just taken WDS for a walk? You crack me up Ed 😂.


{Ed002's Note - #WonderDogSparky has never been taken for a walk.}

08 Feb 2016 11:38:33
I think he has been taken for a ride though Ed 😂.


08 Feb 2016 00:41:33
With hoffenheim looking like their going down, i hope we go in for sule. Whilst there take Volland and even Rudy.

Believable0 Unbelievable5

07 Feb 2016 23:01:46
Ed's 001 or 002 do you think this ticket price furore is the straw that will break the back of FSG and will force them To sell up? If so when do you think they will look to sell and what part of the world do you think the interested party would likely to hail from?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - next year, probably China the way things are going.}

08 Feb 2016 04:43:19
Red army, red army, red army!


08 Feb 2016 06:12:24
Would not mind new owners even if they are from China. They should be ambitious and actually care about football as first priority, and not building a business model ahead of trophies and success. Ed002 has mentioned about being wary about new owners, but it is a shake up that the club desperately needs. FSG clearly do not know enough about football to take the club forward, and the people they have appointed to run the club have failed miserably right. Once the stadium upgrade is done, FSG will sell imo.


08 Feb 2016 08:37:35
Crap that is Indian. This has nohitng to do with Ambition. You were here all year wanting a new manager and they got you one of the best. FSG have spend nearly 300 mill and we still couldn't win a tea cup.

The club cannot over spend nor spend more than what it earns. No billionare could save any club unless its start winning.

Your previous managers wasted money to suit their own ridiculous arguments and now the fans call them greedy persons inside the stadium.

What a club we have become lately.


08 Feb 2016 08:43:58
I completely disagree. wouldn't trust the chinese owners. Everyone was made up kenny huang was interested in buying the club and look what the eds told us about him.

I know you can't tar them all with the same brush but i think they may have a different mentality to arabic owners, who want to buy the clubs as their toys.


08 Feb 2016 09:16:45
Ed,

If the club where to sell up, would you expect there to be some sort of clearout from the boardroom? i. e ayre?


{Ed002's Note - Possibly - what is you problem with Mr Ayre?}

08 Feb 2016 09:46:40
£77, really?


{Ed002's Note - What does that mean? Why do you hold Mr Ayre respoinsible for a rise in the ticket prices? Are you a lemming? Are you going to honest and say taht it is not about ticket prices but the desire to see the owners move on?}

08 Feb 2016 10:28:13
Anonymous how can you say you "wouldn't trust" Chinese owners when you don't have a clue who they may (or more likely) may not be?


08 Feb 2016 12:14:47
Im saying the mentality and goals of virtually all chinese businessmen and women seem to be the same and the implications are worrying not just for football, but every venture they enter.

If you're worrying about the club being taken away from the fans now, i can see it getting a lot worse under owners from the far east. Everything is just an asset to them.


 
Change Consent