Liverpool Banter Archive December 08 2015

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

08 Dec 2015 20:28:43
Im starting to think chelsea actually cheated us with the sturridge deal!

Believable5 Unbelievable18

08 Dec 2015 21:37:31
Are you high? Sturridge has scored so many goals for us regardless of how many games he has been injured. He's been well worth the investment.

Agree9 Disagree6

08 Dec 2015 21:50:39
people will disagree with me on this and put this the other week but a striker needs to be bought. I really like Sturridge and on his day he can be lethal but its just waiting for that day to happen these days. This is ridiculous now and i know he can't help it as such but the club have to think of possibly moving on from Sturridge.

Agree9 Disagree4

08 Dec 2015 22:21:16
Buy another striker?

So we'll have "another striker"
Ings
Firmino
Benteke
Origi

Not a priority IMO and who are you going to buy in January that's better than Sturridge?

Agree13 Disagree6

08 Dec 2015 22:29:00
He's won nothing for us anyway so what.

Agree8 Disagree10

08 Dec 2015 22:40:01
Official then Sturridge out again. What an unlucky player.
Our best striker without a doubt, what a shame.
Seems we are going to have no forwards if they keep getting injured.
Could end up costing us top four. Though i hope not.

Agree6 Disagree1

08 Dec 2015 23:14:15
Firmino ain't no striker. Studge is a lame horse i'm afraid. He plays how long on sunday an now he's out till after xmas! Sorry but time to put him out to pastures new like fleetwood or everton.

Agree3 Disagree10

08 Dec 2015 23:19:47
So a single good season is worth the investment? . not denying his ability. no one ever can. but it seems he can't last a few games without injury anymore. which is very frustrating and any title seeking team can't build a winning team on a player like that.

Agree5 Disagree3

08 Dec 2015 23:41:17
You say whos better than sturridge well not many strikers are better than sturridge WHEN HE PLAYS. Firmino is not a striker, origi has only had one good game, ings will be back next season so ye buying another striker doesn't sound that stupid now does it. Top 4 is our aim remember that. If benteke gets layed off for a while you will be screaming we need another striker.

Agree6 Disagree3

08 Dec 2015 23:45:55
He's scored 50+ goals for us. Who on our roster has done that?

Agree4 Disagree1

09 Dec 2015 02:42:39
That was in large part due to one stellar season 18 months ago now TJ and none of our strikers have been around for more than this half season.

In fact one can argue his injuries were at least partly to blame for BR losing his job - we would have definitely scored a lot more if he'd been leading the line as was planned (although we should probably thank him for that as it would have just disguised the flaws IMO) .

Last thing we need now is for Klopp to stumble because of him. He needs a reliable first team that's available for the majority of the season and that fits with his style of play. Sturridge can't be that anymore and Benteke is still a question mark as to style of play.

This is the last straw for me. perhaps we are better off selling both in the summer if Benteke can't prove himself able to adapt before then, and we can start next season with someone else to lead the line (eg a Lacazette/Benzema/Reus type player + Ings + Origi + Firmino)

Agree1 Disagree3

09 Dec 2015 04:41:05
Yeah right right, chekski cheated liverpool for 12mil so that we can score 25 goals with DS in 13/14 season?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - it was hardly cheated, he did more than just score goals, he made a difference.}

08 Dec 2015 20:22:27
Is it true that Sturridge has done his hamstring and is out till after Xmas?

Believable8 Unbelievable5

08 Dec 2015 20:29:29
A lot of sites reporting this, so you can guarantee its true! His injuries are just ridiculous!

Agree10 Disagree4

08 Dec 2015 22:26:37
I just don't see him ever fitting in with Klopp's high intensity training. Either Klopp allows him to have a separate training regime or he'll be sold.

Agree6 Disagree2

08 Dec 2015 22:39:45
He'll get rid of the majority anyway Ron.
Benteke, Studge, Milner, Allen, Lovren, Migs. They're all as good as sold, Klopp will bring in his own players.
I can guarantee We'll be a big Red German machine within 3 years crushing most of Europe.

Agree5 Disagree6

08 Dec 2015 23:09:29
How the hell did he get through the medical at anfield?

Agree1 Disagree1

08 Dec 2015 23:18:02
Who is disagreeing with my post? I'm afraid sturridges time is up! We can't continue paying his high wages for 1 or 2 games every 3 months! Need a striker who will stay fit and play through the little niggles and not cry about it! Shame but that's why Chelsea got rid!

Agree3 Disagree7

08 Dec 2015 21:00:11
Anything Eds?!

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 18:18:57
I know it's already been mentioned, but I have to say it's so refreshing to hear a manager say he doesn't care about signings and he wants to work with the squad he's got. I think Jurgen recognises we have serious talent, I'm glad he's taking the time to access where it's necessary to reinforce, rather than throwing money around on attacking midfielders!

Believable8 Unbelievable3

08 Dec 2015 19:43:09
I think tacitly, he means that he will give this squad every chance to show that they deserve to be here beyond the summer. No doubts we will see changes in the summer.

Agree9 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 20:58:45
There will be ins and outs in January.

Agree2 Disagree7

08 Dec 2015 21:21:12
He needs someone that can take a corner to start with.

Agree7 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 16:41:09
Ed's and fellow reds, After selling a striker at a huge loss, due to him not fitting the style of our play Andy Carroll.

Believable0 Unbelievable4

{Ed002's Note - It was nothing to do with the transfer committee nor Rodgers - try blaming Dalglish.}

08 Dec 2015 17:30:08
Ed why have you cut the rest of the text that went on to say why did the committee make the same mistake with Benteke?

Agree1 Disagree3

{Ed002's Note - Because the people you need to blame were Dalglish and Comolli. There was no transfer committee - your phrase of "utterly useless" is about Dalglish - not about Roberts. There was no transfer committee at that time.}

08 Dec 2015 22:28:00
Carroll, only for his injury problems and having too much time on his hands due to these injuries could have been a great signing? thoughts?

Agree4 Disagree7

08 Dec 2015 23:06:45
Looked the business at Newcastle, still stick by I was happy we bought him but very shocked at what happened after.

I still remember his 2 vs city and I thought he'd settled then.

He just seemed to lose any pace after we got him, he looked powerful and not quick but abit sharper at the toon bit such a donkey at our place. He wasn't even powerful in the air.

Remember his goal against us from about 40 yards out as well.

Agree3 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 23:24:29
Is that a wind up, Begball?

Carroll was an awful signing then, and worse now.

In ways, Carroll hindered Suarez' development early on, being forced to play with an immobile target man, leading to lazy crosses and long balls thrown into the box, neutralizing Suarez' skills and talents.

It took us turfing Carroll, changing our formation/approach, and bringing in some skilled attacking players like Sturridge/Coutinho, for Suarez to flourish and develop into a world beater.

People have been ripping Firmino, but I see Benteke similarly hindering his play. After being a monster at City, Firmino has been forced to start each subsequent game with Benteke. The entire team plays worse when Benteke starts, but Firmino especially, as he is effectively neutralized -- no outlets, no one to combine creative runs/passing.

Agree7 Disagree0

09 Dec 2015 05:03:52
Carragher had some very pointed remarks to make about Carroll and his lack of effort both on the field and more particular in training. If true, then I can't see how Carroll could have ever been a success.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - Carroll is a drunken bum who should never have been bought.}

08 dec 2015 12:46:16
hi all- was wondering what peoples thoughts are on left backs? moreno i don't think is good enough defensively but where is the cover- gomez is injured- enrique? can is wasted back there- any one have any ideas? is klopp going to buy in january? a final question- surely balotelli is a much better player to have on the bench/squad than benteke?

Believable0 Unbelievable25

08 Dec 2015 13:39:09
Balotelli is possibly the only player since the days of Joey Barton that I would describe as cancerous to a squad - he's a distracting clown, and an average footballer. Our left back cover is Smith until the return of Flanagan, then we will see. However, since Klopp started Moreno has been immense so I'm not sure where the criticism is coming from.

Agree14 Disagree2

08 Dec 2015 13:45:32
That is an area we will need cover for, for sure. Whether with Brad Smith or a new signing, there has to be cover there.

Agree5 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 13:59:19
Moreno immense? The boy doesn't yet have the concentration needed to defend properly.

Two identical goals conceded against Chelsea and Saints show that.

Agree9 Disagree15

08 Dec 2015 18:21:03
Does it not flaw your theory in that Benteke has more goals already for Liverpool this season that Ballotelli got all last year?

Agree3 Disagree1

08 Dec 2015 19:32:43
Moreno has never been "immense". He's a mediocre left winger who has been played as a wingback. He's very poor at defending.
Balotelli is better off disrupting some other club.
Undoubtedly talented, undoubtedly lazy, selfish, moody and enigmatic.

Agree1 Disagree7

08 Dec 2015 19:45:17
I suspect the OP got that many disagrees due to his Balotelli over Beneteke comment.

I certainly won't any sleep over Moreno if he leaves.

Agree3 Disagree3

08 Dec 2015 12:34:37
Klopp: "We made our goal, but because we weren't good enough today, the linesman thought, 'Don't make world-class goals if play this ****. "

Klopp can be brilliant stand up comedian if he is not football manager. Its not just one time, he keeps doing it again and again, its his funny personality that endears him to fans.

Believable13 Unbelievable0

08 Dec 2015 13:48:56
That is a very comical way od completely blasting the linesman for his error without being overt about it. Maybe Maureen and Van Hoof can learn a little bit from him. You think that`s funny? You should see what he said about Goetze and Pep after he moved to Bayern. Completely hilarious!

Agree7 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 16:07:10
Klopp must be doing something right if Ferguson has come out and said twice now that he is worried about what Klopp could do with LFC.

Agree5 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 16:34:59
Fergie should just shut it. He's trying to add more media pressure onto us by using his old media muckers and sadly it's still effective! Grrr.

Agree4 Disagree5

{Ed001's Note - all he has done is compliment Klopp, not sure it is anything other than that.}

08 Dec 2015 16:39:08
I wish I could share your view Ed1.

Agree5 Disagree5

08 Dec 2015 19:33:40
Fergie needs to retire gracefully. Time to shut up old man.

Agree2 Disagree4

08 Dec 2015 19:36:51
Klopp appears to be a very sharp man. He is adept at saying one thing and implying something altogether more meaningful for those who are listening and he is doing it in a second language. He knows what he wants to say and gets his point across and does it in a very astute manner. I am looking forward to his timi hargea great deal.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 20:11:52
Fergie retired a while ago, and if he's saying he's worried about klopp succeeding, I'm not sure what is ungracious about that.

Agree5 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 17:39:54
Ferguson is the most underhanded person in football when it comes to manipulating the press towards Liverpool FC over the years he managed. I wish he would just fade away he has had his go and Klopp really does not need any back slapping from him.

Agree3 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 21:49:02
Fergie has jinx us a few times. The latest jinx result in a 2-0 loss. Before that was Charlie adam freekick worth 10mil and Daglish got suckered in.

Agree1 Disagree1

08 Dec 2015 12:03:16
{Ed's Note - We have posted a new article entitled, 10 Of The Worst

Believable3 Unbelievable2

08 Dec 2015 11:26:15
Just want to say a big thank you and a Merry Christmas to ALL the Ed's. Thanks also for putting up with us over the last year. I know some of us can be a right pain in the backside at times but we are only football fans and sometimes football fans and intelligence don't go in the same sentence.
Happy Christmas Eds.

Believable4 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - thank you Barry, I hope you have a great Christmas too mate. Hopefully with lots of wins to spread cheer!}

08 Dec 2015 13:49:36
Merry Chritmas to all the Ed`s as well. And to you, Barry.

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 16:30:34
If Carlsberg did posts.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 18:05:32
And to you and yours Redohio. Do I get a prize Gazza?

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 10:15:31
Question for ed001 would you keep Mignolet, or would you look for another keeper in the summer. in my opinion I think bernad Leno would be a great buy and quality replacement.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - I personally do not think there is any doubt that Mignolet has to be replaced by a better keeper.}

08 Dec 2015 10:44:57
Yes ed I agree the only reason I ask is that Klopp has gave him his support, I don't know if that is because he needs to keep him on side till the summer or he generally rates him. Which I'm worried about don't get me wrong his performances as of late have improved, I just think he's not liverpool quality as he is as inconsistent as the British weather.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I am remain to be convinced that Klopp really did give him his backing as such. He just said he has quality goalkeepers at the club, but he could have equally well been talking about Ward.}

08 Dec 2015 10:56:01
Ed your on fire today. Your speaking the truth is so refreshing to read considering some of the posts I've been reading by other posters.

Agree0 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - thank you.}

08 Dec 2015 11:17:09
I don't really follow Scottish football but i do believe Ward is doing well question is do you think he is ready to potentially replace Migonlet.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I haven't seen him play since he went up there on loan, but Aberdeen certainly think he is ready to be a first choice keeper. The reports being sent back to the club are glowing.}

08 Dec 2015 12:16:01
Thats good to know, we do need to change keepers just don't feel safe with migonlet in between the sticks.

Agree0 Disagree1

08 Dec 2015 12:36:05
I don't mean to put a dampener or things, but playing for Abardeen in Scotland and playing for Liverpool in England in 4 different competitions with all that pressure and up against the likes of Aguero, Sanchez, Hazard etc is a totally different ball game.

Agree0 Disagree2

{Ed001's Note - no it is not. You will find it is still the same ball game.}

08 Dec 2015 12:49:54
Stopping a good shot is stopping a good shot. Picking out a player from distance is still the same (considering the weather, often harder in Scotland) . If anything, a goalkeeper is the easiest position to judge in lower quality leagues.

Agree1 Disagree2

08 Dec 2015 13:51:00
"Footbal is football anywhere you play it", Klopp.

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 16:20:43
Sorry for the late reply ed as I am moving house so I'm abit hectic at the moment. Thank you for your reply aswell yes he may well be talking about ward. He's still along way off being number one tho. However I think he sould give bogdan more time between the sticks IMO.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I am not convinced by Bogdan, I would rather have Ward than him in nets.}

08 Dec 2015 16:42:55
Ward is an exceptional keeper and so complete for his age, deserves a go as he definitely isn't worse than what we have. Sent shivers down my spine when Klopp 'backed' Mignolet so I hope its just a ruse to prevent his performances dropping, again. I'd be made up if we signed Leno or Butland don't get me wrong, I just think it'd be criminal to completely overlook Ward.

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 18:00:26
From doing the loan reports this season Ward is a player I have taken particular interest in as he has been exceling. Some of the saves he's pulled off are top drawer!
Like a poster said above doesn't matter what division your in a great save is a great save!

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 19:35:29
Football is different in USA, Canada and Australia.

Agree1 Disagree2

08 Dec 2015 19:49:50
So there is no difference facing Man City, Chelsea or Arsenal and their varied styles of play in the PL over facing Dundee and Falkirk in the Scottish league Ed001?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - you didn't say that, you said it was a different ball game, which it isn't.}

08 Dec 2015 20:14:04
I'd sell both, buy an experienced reliable stopper, and have him and ward compete. Ward can learn off him and either will be suitable as a replacement or starter.

Agree1 Disagree2

08 Dec 2015 23:59:37
Agree Fencey, move on Migs (not rounded or confident enough to be our no.1) and Bogdan (should be playing 1st team somewhere, just not Liverpool), then bring in Patricia or Bernd and let Ward compete with them for a starting spot.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 08:44:09
Away vs Exeter in the FA cup, my home town! Can't wait for this one. Tapping up all of my Exeter City Trust mates for tickets, so will be there cheering on the Redmen (albeit quietly to save myself from a lynching), going for a 3-1 as in the League cup 3 years ago.

Believable4 Unbelievable0

08 Dec 2015 12:19:10
I am at the university, so will be nice to have the team so close.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 08:22:56
Question for Ed001 - Do you think that Connor Randall is better than Andre Wisdom or Martin Kelly (2 players who are on loan or sold in recent past)? I'm just pondering over the club's loan/transfer policies. I've read your comments before where you've said the policy was a disaster (loans and sales) . My follow up question would be is it an individual making these decisions or is it once again a matter under the purview of that "committee"?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - none of those players are actually specialist fullbacks, all 3 are converted from other roles, Randall midfield, Kelly and Wisdom from centre back. As such they have completely different strengths and weaknesses in the role. So better is a relevant term, depending on what you really want in that position.

Randall is good on the ball, but he is still very new to the role and struggles defensively. He is tenacious and keeps going, even when he is struggling, but it is mostly potential that he possesses.

Kelly is tall and good in the air, quite quick, very composed on the ball and defensively aware, but tends to dwell a little on the ball and not look for the quick forward pass Palace want from their full backs. He also is not physically suited to charging up and down the flank, which is why he picks up a few injuries. The best defensively of the 3, but lacks strength.

Wisdom is a brute of a man, strong and quick, a real powerhouse, with a much better touch and pass than he is given credit for. Not quite tall enough for what people expect from a centre back, so moved to the flanks, where he has shown the ability on the ball to be comfortable there.

All three could become an international class full back, if they want it enough, get the right coaching and have a coach who plays to their strengths. None are anywhere near that level yet. Overall, Wisdom slightly edges it for me, but it is only slightly.

The decisions were different in every case, Wisdom's move to Norwich was a mixed decision, but the final decision always came from the manager. By mixed, I mean Norwich City made an offer which the club were amenable to so Rodgers was asked if he saw Wisdom in his plans for the season.}

08 Dec 2015 08:46:10
Thanks much for the expansive answer, Ed. Much appreciated. I would have thought that you would rate Kelly higher than Wisdom because in some of his early games he really was quite impressive. But you are right. Wisdom is a brute of a man, and for me, the ideal backup to Clyne. Not because he is as good or better. Because he offers more defensive solidity and I really think backups (for all positions) should offer something different than the starter. This is the only way to address the variety of teams and playing styles in both the League and in Europe.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I really like Kelly, but he needs game time, which he won't get at Palace while Ward is there. Ward is one of those players that is beloved of the manager for no apparent reason. It doesn't seem to matter how badly he plays, he will always get picked for the next game. In fact, it was watching him constantly getting caught out of position that gave me an idea for a new article. There are so many players out there that play and you think 'what on earth does the manager see in him that I am missing'. They play like a donkey week after week, yet still maintain their place, it is quite bizarre how many of them there are.}

08 Dec 2015 09:16:59
Yes I know what you mean. Don't we have the same situation with the great "Milner" mystery, that we are all seeing? LOL. I can't make any head or tails out of this. Apart from seniority (which is a misguided way of picking players), I can't see any other reason. What Rodgers and Klopp see in him is baffling. At the beginning of the season, I thought he had been brought in to provide experienced stability given Gerrard's and Carragher's departure. Seen no such thing.

Agree3 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - very much so, he was one of the first players that came to mind.}

08 Dec 2015 11:34:45
^ Just to touch on this ed001,I spoke to a premier league 1st team coach about 4 year back who worked under a manager, who was lost as to why a player kept getting gametime, I spoke with him about 4 months ago and asked if he ever got an answer or worked out why, he said when he approached the manager it was because he felt a fellow follower of his religion needed a push an i was the right thing to do.

tried not giving names away there, but people may be able to work it out.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - some people may be able to, but I won't as I have no idea what religion most people are!}

08 Dec 2015 12:53:06
I still maintain that a fully fit Kelly and Sakho could have been an awesome CB combination.

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 14:02:10
Ed, you are so right. Through out my years of watching footie till this day, I would watch some players and would think, "Wow, I must have missed a career in not following my dream" because some of them are God aweful and they still get to play every game regardless of how poor they are. This happens at all levels, mind you for various reasons other tnah people`s ability on the ball. Ward is a good example. Another one in the same CP team is Delaney. How he plays all the games is baffling while Kelly, a true CB is either out at FB or doesn`t play at all.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 14:51:24
I'm always reminded about Graeme souness playing ''george weah's cousin''

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 07:58:21
With Rodgers being linked with a return to Swansea, do we think he'll be looking to take his boy Allen back too? We paid £15m surely by Rodgers valuation we could get at least £20m 😉.

Believable7 Unbelievable1

08 Dec 2015 10:05:09
Wouldn't be the worst idea in the world. Perhaps we could even swap him for Ayew and have someone who can play on the wing as our plan B with Benteke!

Agree0 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - Ayew was desperate to join in the summer, as he is a Liverpool fan, but Rodgers did not want him.}

08 Dec 2015 10:27:18
I don't think ayew is the class of player we should Go for. If we are going to buy they need to be a big step up, not just another squad player.

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 10:57:11
To be fair ed I've just gave you a nice post above but I don't think there is many who would of wanted ayew as he's not good enough.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I never said we should have signed him, just that he was desperate to join but not wanted by Rodgers. It was more because I was pointing out that the chances of Rodgers wanting to swop Allen for Ayew are fairly decent. I was not suggesting it would be a good move for either team.}

08 Dec 2015 11:29:55
Yeah I wasn't meaning to have a gk it was just how you phrased it. It sounds like we all wanted him but it was yet again another bad move by Rodgers.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - that was not my intention sorry. I was never keen on the idea of him joining either.}

08 Dec 2015 12:12:49
I was actually joking based on the rumours he wanted to move somewhere but perhaps it's not unfeasible after all!

Can't say I know for sure whether Ayew is the goods or not, but if we are to keep Benteke I wouldn't mind a top winger in the side. Milner and Llalana too slow, Ibe still has much room to improve on his crossing (as do our FBs) and Coutinho/Firmino are natural no.10's. tough to say we have a perfect setup to make the most of Benteke without a Mane/Mahrez/Willian/Sanchez type player to call on out wide.

If you offered me a costless swap Allen for Ayew it would at least be worth looking into as it would add something we lack right now.

Agree0 Disagree1

08 Dec 2015 11:22:07
Ayew will score goals. He has excellent pace and physique for the league. Would be a brilliant signing IMO.

Agree1 Disagree1

08 Dec 2015 14:04:44
Been an OM fan for decades and I watched even Ayew through out his career at OM and frankly apart from a great engin and superior aerial ability, I wouldn`t want him here. we have better players than him already at the club.

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 16:53:23
I love how you use those 4 names when saying we need a top winger and then suggest ayew. He's not even a fast winger is he more of slower but powerful number 10.

And Ed I am glad Rodgers has gpme, I just didn't want anymore uneccesary bleating on about him. Especially when there is real stuff to have a go at him for.

On another note now he is gone, were there any players that would have done well for is that Rodgers asked for but was told no?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - who would tell him no?}

08 Dec 2015 05:16:59
{Ed's Note - We have posted a new article entitled, Pato linked with everyone and Powell returns to the Manchester United squad

Believable0 Unbelievable0

08 Dec 2015 04:29:54
I would advice people to watch evertons goal against palace to make it 1-1. A way of playing we have been awful at for many many years now. They constantly used the wings and should have been ahead before a smash and grab by palace. When you used the wings to stretch teams you open up gaps in defence, but when benteke is your plan A you have to be able to cross quality balls into the box and have bodies in their to convert. It's such an easy concept against these defensive teams, it's almost always the only way to break them down unless you get lucky and knick a goal. It doesn't work all the time but it is the way to win those sort of matches unless you are awesome on the ball and play fast intricate football like Barcelona (which we are not able to do), or you have a player like Suarez to carry the team. Very simple concept, practice and prepare for games like Newcastle or palace or west brom by using the wings and swining in 'quality' I repeat 'quality' balls into the box. Get good at taking and defending set pieces. If we don't fix these things those teams will continue to be our weakness (and not just the odd loss, more like half the time we play these teams) .

Everton did that today, knowing how to counter palace playing style. And they saved the game and definitely should have won the game.

Believable3 Unbelievable2

08 Dec 2015 04:58:09
I lol at your idea of using the wings when looking at the fullbacks and wingers we have. Even ibe cannot deliver simple cross. Next better idea.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I think it is pointless discussing football with someone who holds up Everton as being good at set pieces! No wonder he thinks their play is all about good wing play, when their set pieces are considered good. They don't even practice them. At all. Roberto Martinez considers them to be beneath him.}

08 Dec 2015 05:53:49
You don't need to look at Everton, you can look at the third goal of Origi against Southampton. The problem is, as people already said here, our wingers can't cross (and I don't see Brad Jones replace Moreno on a regular basis) . Maybe things will improve with Henderson. he is not a winger but at least he can give the kind of long range assists of the kind Can and Allen gave Stirridge against Southampton.

Agree0 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - I am glad Jones will not be replacing Moreno, even putting aside the fact he has left the club, he is a goalkeeper! I would assume you mean Brad Smith mate.}

08 Dec 2015 08:06:03
Well at least I got the first name right, not bad for this time in the morning.

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - good point.}

08 Dec 2015 06:20:21
Kman92

Pretty much right. I did try to bring up this discussion on the page and was brushed aside claiming the movement up top was static blah blah etc.

Martinez has been playing this style from ever since he took over Everton. Baines and Coleman press very high up the pitch and whip in crosses.

City plays very similar with Korolov and Sagna / Zabaletta hit the byline constantly.

We had no idea against new castle. Wasted the first 45 mts doing nothing.

People need to check the facts before buying Clyne. He is a not a good crosser. The only reason Milner was bought to put in crosses and he has been terrible all season.
Ibe cuts inside and never hits the byline.

We play narrow.

Agree0 Disagree3

08 Dec 2015 07:12:37
So, if a team "parks the bus" and concedes possession, unless you're Barcelona with Suarez and Messi and can play "intricate" football, the only real option to "break down" such a defense is to play a boring style of football perfected by Everton, by stretching defences with wingers and throwing in crosses?

Well, given that Barcelona isn't in the EPL, and most teams fall back defensively when playing away, I was shocked to learn (from a simple google search) that Everton hasn't won a league title in decades! Must be their set pieces need work.

Klopp describes his ball as heavy metal. This strategy sounds more like elevator music on repeat.

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 11:40:53
How far did that wing play get Everton last year EG?

Milner was brought to put crosses in. yet played central midfield under rodgers.

You were shot down about the movement because we kept the ball wide, and Benteke didn't move.

Kolorov sagna and Zabaletta hit the by line contantly. I think you should see where the majority of city's goals have come from this season. Their width has been seriously lacking compared to previous seasons. Is by line a new term you've seen Harry, you've used it a lot recently.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 14:09:16
Kman2, you can have great wingers and crossers BUT if your CF can`t be arsed to bust a gut and get into the box, it`s not going to matter. And using Everton as a template where as many people even among Everton fans, know that Robbie is nothing other than a BR with more articulate and media-friendly platitudes, discredits your premise.

Agree0 Disagree1

08 Dec 2015 11:26:49
Fear

So far we have failed to breach that system. There is no shame in playing with wingers. UTD dominated English football for more than 20 years with Paul Scholes and two Wingers either side.

It's stupid to compare any team with MSN. They are in their own league and could score against any style of play.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 12:16:34
Bob,

Everton used to play with their Full backs. Baines and Coleman were pretty good a season ago If I remember.

Milner was promised a central role and was bought to replace Gerrard. He simply couldn't and got shifted to wide and was even worse.

City always depends on their full back who press very high. that's the system they used in the past with great success.
KDB and Sterling who normally plays on the flanks have scored plenty in between. Aguero has been absent for ages.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 14:55:20
''Milner was brought to put crosses in. yet played central midfield under rodgers''

''Milner was promised a central role and was bought to replace Gerrard''

This is why people don't take you seriously.

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 15:01:40
btw, the goals from city have come from wide, but not wide positions or crosses. Simplyusing pace to get to ''by lines'' and cross in. it's involved raheem and KDB cutting in centrally.

Everton had one good season using coleman up high and baines, a lot of their goals come from counter attacks using Kone, Barkley and Lukaku. They are quite clinical on the break. so far over 14/15 and 15/16 baines and coleman have been ineffective going forward.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 17:00:43
EG,

Of course there is "no shame" in putting out wingers. In fact, I actually think we could benefit from greater width in some of our formations offered by wingers with more pace, but not necessarily to just throw in a cross; rather, to provide more options on counter-attack or to cut in, with creative movement in our attack.

But to suggest that this tactic/strategy is the only way to break down defenses is simple thinking. You don't have to be Barcelona to break down a defensive team sitting deep with something other than crosses from wide; you can also do it with an attacking line with creative movement, comfort on the ball in tight spaces, triangle passing with quick movement through traffic, and a fast and effective press if the ball is lost in those tight spaces.

United may have had success with this simple/boring style of crossing in, for many years in the EPL, but thankfully football has evolved, and we have a manager who plays a far more exciting and fluid style, that ultimately, will be far more successful in today's EPL.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Dec 2015 23:50:41
The Klopp factor will be hampered by the ghost of the previous regime until Jurgen can start to draft in his own players.
The real transformation will probably only take place next summer so we must be patient. Jurgen Klopp is already working wonders with an over-priced hardcore of players and a slightly above-average fringe-squad.

Believable1 Unbelievable8

08 Dec 2015 00:51:20
Not every squad will be perfectly setup for a new manager but they aren't far off what he needs IMO and training and time can do the rest.

We don't need yet another transformation thanks, that would be disruptive and expensive. We just need a few key tweaks (ie to solve the Benteke conundrum, Allen doesn't suit our style)

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 05:42:12
Klopp has no repeatedly said on multiple occasions that he wants to work with these players. He is still figuring out what some of them can do, and what they cannot and it won't happen overnight or even after 15 or 20 games. And frankly, I am rather impressed he is giving these players every opportunity to prove themselves; some are already showing what they can do while some are struggling, but changes will be made in he summer IMO.

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Dec 2015 14:20:13
The fact that we have gotten better results, scored more goals and conceded less with a group of players BR signed and wasted no time in trashing when it was convenient for him in such a short time, is impressive in itself. He wanted these players because he like many of us on here, believed that they were worth the chance and Klopp has proven that. not all will make it BUT he will have the chance to mould the team in his image come this summer.

Agree1 Disagree0

 
Change Consent