Liverpool Banter Archive June 06 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

06 Jun 2014 23:14:20
Hope we don't buy Lallana, great player don't get me wrong but for the 30million that is being quoted there are better players on the market, I think what we need is a winger rather than an attacking mid player like Lallana I feel his purchase would also hinder the progress of all our young "number 10's" in Coutinho, Suso and Teixera. Sterling is really our only out and out winger I would bring someone like Shaqiri and keep Ibe as backup.
I also think Can is brilliant signing and he is like the perfect box to box player and think he can in the future replace Gerrard, him and Hendo in midfield would dominate most teams.
A left back is needed, hopefully we get Moreno or someone else who is first team ready.
Finally a centre back, a real world class commanding centre back is what we need, we lacked Carragher last year, someone who can play next to Sakho who I think will become a world class centre back himself.
Add a few squad players here and there and maybe bring in a few of the academy players.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I do agree with you Mr.C that £30M is excessive for Lallana as I also feel there are far more better options out there for the price quoted, however if that's who the club decide to go for than i'm happy as he is a leader and also a very good player that would help us push on that little bit further weather he's a starter or not i'm not sure yet.

Texieria will most likely get a loan next season to get regular experience, Suso & Coutinho I imagine will be competing against each other to play the number 10 role and if we sign Shaqiri then he will compete with Sterling on the right. I think we all know that our current squad is not big enough and good enough to cope with key injures as we lack squad depth and Rodgers is doing a brilliant job so far by getting quality players in, in the key areas where we need strengthen, Lambert is a bargain the man scores where ever he goes and will gives us a different option next season, in all honesty I have never seen Emre Can play but what I have read and hear is suppose to be a real talented player but don't get the recognition he deserves but i'm sure he will be a valuable addition to the club and his versatility is awesome.

Moreno is/will be a very good signing as he has it all I really do like him and am excited that we will have a player of his calibre at left back and hopefully he can solve the left back problem for many of years, i'd possible keep Enrique as back up unless were going to use Flanagan as back up or even young Smith.

I agree we need a top CB to play alongside Sakho, who i'm not to sure I like Papadouplous but don't see it happening as Lovren seems more likely at this time and he is defiantly the better option than Caulker who for me is no improvement on what we already have, Sakho will be a much better player next season make no mistake he is a very good player and last season was his first season in English football so now he has got it under his belt he will be better.

I really want to see more of Samed Yesil as he is a very good player but has been hampered by injures, hopefully next season he will be given opportunities in the cup games and maybe from the bench, also i'd like to see more of Jordan Ibe, Marc Pelosi & Ryan McLaughlin given opportunities.

Agree0 Disagree0

Lallana is better than all our 10's and the overrated shaqiri

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2014 10:28:55
I agree that 30 million would be too much to pay for lallana,but you can't blame SOuthampton trying to get the most for their captain and best player
.I still think he would ba great player for us though.all of the players we are going for are attack minded even the left back Moreno and the Cdm Can.I think you need options,because of injuries and loss of form happen in a long season.ALl these hungry young players will drive each other on.Hendo was behind Shelvey Lucas Gerrard Allen and Coutinho in January 2013 and now he would be no 1 for a mldfield berth.Brendan gives opportunities to players.The more options he has will drive the young players on Sterling was poor upto xmas and then he took off.I say the targets we are going for have desire to be winners.It's much better having real competition for places than having a bench full of players who are below the level that are on the pitch.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2014 11:02:36
Shaqiri overrated by whom? He has proved to be a talented footballer.I have seen enough of him to believe he will give us a better option than Aspas Moses and Alberto. It will be down to him whether he wants to be a regular or not.Better than Sterling before the Xmas period? Players are human Sterling had problems at that time. I am all for improving the quality of the squad.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 22:41:48
Seen emre can play much ed001?
Your opinion if you have mate

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 19:34:23
When Suarez goes I think I'd definitely use some of the money to try and buy Lukaku. I'm sure Ed002 will tell me if that's viable or not?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Too young to put out to stud Chris - or were you thinking of something else?}

Im sure I read somewhere recently that Lukaku was being looked at by Atletico to replace Costa. I also saw something linking him to Dortmund. Either way I don't see him at Liverpool.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2014 07:32:14
I don't know if Dortmund are still looking for a striker after buying Ramos and Immobile.

Atletico might well be looking to him after loosing Villa and Costa.

Agree0 Disagree0

I was thinking that he's good enough to buy should Suarez leave

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree with chris. I won't be dishearten if suarez leaves because this time last year we asked him for just 1 more season and he gave it to us and only to be sold overseas and for a lot of money. suarez is a legend just for that. he can leave with his head up high. although if he does leave, lukaku would be the best replacement in my eyes

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 18:21:04
Hi Ed002, are there any updates on Alberto Moreno? Lot of sites saying we've agreed a deal, but they don't look the most reliable! Cheers.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - There should be nothing stopping it going through.}

06 Jun 2014 18:20:07
Hi Ed002,
Clearly Rakatic to LFC ain't happening but reports say that Barcelona have agreed a deal with Sevilla. Any truth to the story? You have mentioned before that he will not go for cheap but the price reported is exactly that.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Right - not Liverpool and Barca are working a deal.}

06 Jun 2014 20:02:55
Hi eds thanks for putting up with my endless nonsense, between Shaqiri and Lallana who is closer to a move and on a more personal note to eds and reds which would you prefer and why? Thanks

Believable0 Unbelievable0

IMO that Shaqiri would be the better buy. Younger, Faster, more of the out and out winger that we need. Lallana is good but more central and simular to what we all ready have at the club. And cheaper by the sounds of things. I'm not sure if we are in talks like reports suggest but for me Shaqiri would be a great signing.

Agree0 Disagree0

Lallana of course he's far better imo

Agree0 Disagree0

I like Lallana a lot and would love to see us sign him. I know we need a wide forward, but maybe the Lallana interest will signal the diamond formation being our go to tactic? You'd not bother spending on a wide forward if that wasn't going to be a position we played in most matches. We also have the 4 strikers in the squad to deal with 2 up front, depth for a 4 man midfield would make sense in this case, hence Can and Lallana interest.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hi eds and reds

i really don't understand this infactuation with lallana, I know we all have an opinion and I respect everyones I may not agree with them but they all have valid points, but on here for the last 2 or 3 weeks all everyone goes on about is lallana, he's made out to be one of the best players on the planet, and I bet some will say or believe he is not far off the like of ronaldo or bale or messi , i'm not saying he is a bad player he has had a very good season, but to convince me that he is better than some of the players he has been mentioned against is just hysteria, and for some to say they would pay what ever soton want is beyond me, he has had the soton team built around him, that team played to him, as it was in the youth set up, he does have talent but for me he has not done it season in and season out in the prem, also if he was that good he would have been snapped up by the top teams years ago, but on very good season as in last season and a lot of fans think he is the best midfielder in the prem, people say he can play in different positions, that adds to his ability but look at the likes of king kenny and juhn barnes, souness, yaya toure and a lot of other players who have played in the same position all of their footballing years does not take away from their ability and how good they were, just because he can play in a few position does not make him a great look at matta, or silva they can play in different posotions but they are well better than lallana, also he is not worth £30 mill, that's just my opinion on him any way,

Agree0 Disagree0

Longest sentence I've ever read.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2014 07:31:07
Younger and faster doesn't make a player better. I think Lallana is more suited to the way we play and will be more useful to us as he can play a number of positions in a number of systems. Shaqiri plays one and one way only; as a wide player and we rarely play with width.

Agree0 Disagree0

Yaya Toure operated as a DM at Barcelona, he now plays a very different AM role at Man City.

John Barnes, if I remember rightly, could either play as a winger or out and out striker.

Most of the best players in the world can operate in multiple positions. Left, right. through the middle. Ronaldo, Bale, Messi.

You're changing a strength into a weakness which is just nonsense to me.

Agree, I wouldn't pay 30Mill for him. ED001 states repeatedly Lallana has rejected a number of top teams multiple times. It's not for team's want to sign, it's because until now the lad hasn't wanted to leave.

I have lots of friends who are Leeds United fans and they have watched Lallana for a long time and have raved about him. A friend from uni from Soton raved about him.

Just because you have only just heard of him does not mean he isn't brilliant.

I don't remember anybody comparing him to Messi or Ronaldo.

Agree0 Disagree0

Mikey
If you were old enough to watch the great John Barnes play for us you would remember he was signed as a left winger, moved up front and eventually excelled in central midfield when he lost a bit of pace
Completely the opposite to what your point was!

Agree0 Disagree0

So mickey you'd rather us wait until he has a few more good seasons in the prem? So his value will go up even further? More clubs after him, etc. We bought Henderson on potential and up until this season he had only shown small glimpses but this season he has been vital for us. I know we paid around 20m for him but let's compare lallana for 30m to fellaini for 27m looks like a steal then! Not a great example I know but I think for the lallana transfer it's this summer or never due to his age.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 21:29:01
Edd002, not sure my.last post went through but again. Thanks a lot mate! And.those also who gave great info!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed007's Note - I've left your original post for Ed002 to reply to Al.}

Thanks mate

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 20:14:53
Everybody is talking about selling johnson and I completely agree he can't defend for toffee, but why has he never played as a winger? I think he would make a brilliant wide player as long as he had less defensive duties. What are your thoughts?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I think he falls into an all rounder on the right. I don't think his defence is good enough but because of his attacking attributes, he's been the best option most of the time. When he's on form, no problem. He's not good enough to just we a winger as his crossing is generally poor. I think he should get more credit than he does from most on here but at the very least he needs string competition for his possition, which hopefully will be Flano next season

Agree0 Disagree0

Maybe because not all good wingers are just fullbacks who can't defend.

Agree0 Disagree0

If GJ is in a red shirt next season then I will be hacked off.
The time for excuses have now passed, and as sure as eggs are eggs, he will continue to be a liability.
As he was against Peru, almost gifting them an equaliser on 2 occasions. (playing their forward onside as his mind drifted elsewhere & losing the ball through sheer panic at not knowing what to do)

He is lazy, coupled with the 'I don't really care' type look constantly plastered on his boat race is becoming tedious.

There is less than a 50/50 chance that he will produce something worthwhile when on the ball.
There is therefore, more than a 50/50 chance that he will give it away!

I watched every minute, of every game last season (bar one), and I have loved every second, but time and again he has made me want to scoop out my eyes with a spoon.

With only 11 men on the pitch, one weak link will cost us dearly next season, and we all know how costly a dropped point or two can be.

He will also be a liability for England!

sivy1001

Agree0 Disagree0

I think because a good winger should protect his defensive players also and as a winger it would be added excuse not to have to track back at all

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2014 10:27:19
To add that he gives the ball away more than any player, simple passes or just silly knocks over to nowhere, if he's not doing that he's falling over himself!

Agree0 Disagree0

Is that any red shirt sivy or just a Liverpool one? I'd love to see man u with the dilemma of Johnson, Jones, smalling in defence :D

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 20:14:28
Just been thinking about skrtel, I think he's a top player in big games, puts in 100%, can score important goals, and has played well mostly when we played the top 6 or so! Obviously his problem lies when we play the rest! I know centre backs rely on partnerships to be successful but an unlikely possibility could be to play sahko and ilori for most games and bring in skrtel for champions league plus big matches! This way both would play about half the games, ilori getting important premier league experience and skrtel will have a point to prove, which he seems better when this is the case. For example he was ten times better this season when he was about to be sold than he was last year, the year after being our player of the season!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 20:11:41
Question for the other posters: What do you think of Shaqiri as a player? He seems quite skillful and pacy, but watching videos (which only show the good bits) still point to a lack of end product.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

07 Jun 2014 07:29:29
You summed him up.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2014 11:11:49
That is the perfect summary of Shaqiri so far.
Given the chance with us and how we play, he would excel under Brendan Rodgers and reach his potential.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 20:11:31
sami's been appointed brighton manager best of luck to him

Believable0 Unbelievable0

07 Jun 2014 07:29:04
That is very certain ;). Good luck Sammi.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 20:08:52
Liverpool lose two more coaches to chelsea.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Lets hope we keep the open top bus then

Agree0 Disagree0

Is that another 2, or have you mixed up the 2 that have gone to city

Agree0 Disagree0

They needed another two coaches to park when we play them this year

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 20:07:04
We should loan Teixeira to Brighton. I doubt he will get a loan move to a perm team.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 19:28:18
With Hyppia Brighton manager I hope he signs a couple of our youngsters whether on loan or permanent.

By permanent I'm meaning the likes of Coady, Yesil, Robinson etc.

Possible loans Ibe, Teixera, Wisdom, Rossiter etc.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Would be a good loan move for Yesil as he's a very good player but injures have hampered him in recent seasons, I have no doubt that Yesil can be a top striker.

Texieria would also benefit massively from a loan playing regular first team football competitively rather than under 21 football.

Hope Sami Hyypia does a great job at Brighton. Good Luck!

Agree0 Disagree0

I'd keep yesil he will help Can settle.

Agree0 Disagree0

We should send a few young defenders to brighton

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2014 07:28:26
I doubt Yesil would want to hang around in England. he will likely move back to Germany.

Agree0 Disagree0

I love all these neat solutions that people come up with.

All the kids on loan to Brighton to help old Sami

Keep a German of Turkish descent around the place to hold the hand of the new boy

Sell Aspas so Rickie can have the number 9 shirt because it would mean a lot to him

Shoot all the QPR players before the playoff final so Derby would come up and Andre could stay on loan and get Prem experience and Derby would be so grateful they'd sell us Hughes for £2.50.

I love this stuff. All complete nonsense of course.

Agree0 Disagree0

Anfieldboy I'd sell aspas for any reason really. THAT corner being one of them.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 19:22:10
Oh Sami Sami
Sami Sami Sami Sami Hyypia
God luck at Brighton

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 19:54:14
Good luck big sami he would be a good manager for ilori on loan maybe ibe as well.

Agree0 Disagree0

Love the man, the first shirt number and name I got was his on that white away kit in 2001/2.

Wish him all the best at Brighton.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 19:19:42
Good luck to the big fin, all the best for next season sammi, would have been good to see you as defensive coach at anfield next season, but i'm sure he's going to do well at brighton

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Absolutely, best of luck to him, he deserves it. What's the odds of being drawn against Brighton in one of the cups now?

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 18:29:11
hi eds this might seem a bit bizarre of a question but the players we have signed, are they br 1st choice signings r are they maybe players a little bit further down the list cause maybe he made enquires for other players and got put off them for some reason r another, r they wouldn't sign.i know its abit of a crazy question for so early on and maybe I should of waited till august to ask it, r if you like you can keep it till then haha.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - it depends on how you define first choice really. These players were all players he wanted. Clubs always make enquiries for a number of players, then move for the ones they feel are available for the right price.}

Ed001, I know names is asking a bit too much but what positions are we looking strengthen after we have filled striker, centre midfield and left back?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - goalkeeper.}

06 Jun 2014 18:35:46
Just an opinion but if Suarez was to leave this summer I'd prefer he went to Barcelona and not Madrid.
Couple of reason for this being:

I would be interested see how good him and Messi link up.
They have better players to include in any deal.

if he were to leave for Barca I'd be asking for both Sanchez and Montoya with cash on top roughly 60 million.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 18:56:25
Hope he stays but agree with jones post of his exit if it happens.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 19:00:35
Ronaldo is far better person than Messi. He has the list of players fallen out with Messi.

Agree0 Disagree0

We was on the brink of winning the premier league, closest we've ever ever been, who in the right mind would even consider selling out Best player? He isn't going mate and not £100million + Sanchez would change that

Agree0 Disagree0

Sanchez and montoya plus 60m!seriously how much do think suarez is worth

Agree0 Disagree0

Not a hope of all three!

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 19:27:45
Jessie

How much is the 24 years of wait worth?. He is worth that in terms of money. 4 signings and We would win it next season.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 19:29:57
Young want get anymore than 95 million for him in my opinion.

Agree0 Disagree0

We wouldn't get more than 90-95 million for him. Can't base it on previous transfers.

Anyway both Montoya and Sanchez plus 60 million is a great deal

Don't get me wrong I'd rather he stay this is hypothetically if he left.

Agree0 Disagree0

If he goes it'll be c70m to Madrid. I can't help thinking our early business means its more likely he'll go. Just a feeling.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree with DBol.

If we have ANY ambition we must keep Suarez.

He is a genius beyond comprehension. He does not even need pace, he is sublime. I reckon when he's 35 he'll be even better than he is now.

He can help make us into a team to stand alongside the greats of football history.

The likes of Sanchez and Montoya are good players, very good even.

But they are not fit to lace Suarez's boots. I wouldn't sell Luis for £100m, he can ensure we are compete at the top of the European game for the next decade, that is worth more than anyone can offer us.

We must build a squad to help Luis, not sell him.

Blasphemy, I say. Blasphemy! Damn you all to hell! :)

Agree0 Disagree0

Just remember however much we get for him (if he goes and I think he will) addition players have additional signing on fees and wages so don't think we will have £100+ million to spend on players.

I've said it yesterday - I think we should aim for the same targets and then add maybe Sanchez and a new Striker (although Morato might be an option if Real Madrid sign Suarez) if he does go.

Agree0 Disagree0

Anfield boy is much closer to what Madrid value him at than any other poster has been.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why are some fans even thinking of suarez leaving, if some one from his family or close friends reads these posts it would look like some fans want to sell him for other players and money the last I heard suarez saying is he is not going any where we should be building our team around him, or getting more players like him in, again the man himsel has said he is not going any where, and for dome fans who are wondring here we are getting the money from then look at how much BR was going to be given for transfers then add the money from finishing 2nd then add money from some players we sell, and yes eds I do know money from where we finished and from player sales goes into running the club, higher wages and other things, but not all of it and by where we finished added a lot more money to the transfer fund, its simple if we want to win things then we keep our best players and one of the best players on the planet,

Agree0 Disagree0

Mickeyb

Taking anyone's statements in football at face value is a bit naive. Suarez is in his prime and he's helped us back into CL and we won't be that close to the title next season. If Madrid make an acceptable offer he will be off like a shot. From LFCs point of view there is a narrow window when they can maximise their investment in LS. This summer his value is at its highest. Last summer we were talking 40m (sensible people were) and this summer 70m (forget higher valuations). He will always want to leave for Madrid or Barca so this speculation would just continue window after window. This year is the optimum time to sell. Suspect Soton know our desperation will rise as we get closer to the end of the WC. Rodgers wants Lallana as part of the replacement plan I believe. I also suspect Markovich & Son are left-sided attacking options should we sell LS. As far as an out and out goal-getter as well then Lukaku may be an option, Rodrigo possibly. Another pointer toward LS exit is the seemingly huge wage increases mooted for Sturridge and Sterling which suggests we are nailing them down tight.

Agree0 Disagree0

I would like Suarez to stay. if he doesn't it would be foolish to say we won't miss him. however I would hope that however much money Liverpool receives for him will be spent wisely.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 18:19:58
any have much info on this emre can player? i'm reading negatives about him hope not true

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 19:01:31
Sorry, None here have a negative review on Emre Can or any two signings.

Agree0 Disagree0

Very average player imo and isn't worth 10m he would definitely struggle to adjust to the tempo of the epl
We shouldn't be signing prospects who won't play regularly for us which also disrupts their development.i rather we look inwards than spending so much money on fringe players
Lucas is a better dm than can, we should have kept the 10m and just put that towards signing lallana who would improve our starting 11

Agree0 Disagree0

Having read your reply twice Harry, I couldn't agree more (I think). Jesse, loving the positivity. Won't adjust? Maybe, maybe not. But at least he has your backing. Lallana and Can don't play the same role so it's not really an 'either or or' situation is it?
'Prospects' are vital. Unless we just wait until players nearing the end of their prime should be replaced with new players who are intheir prime (and cost £30m+).

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 22:11:06
Jessie

Y don't you offer another 5mill as a bonus to Southampton.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 22:32:18
Franz Beckenbauer has likened him to a young Paul Breitner.

Versatile. powerful and excellent technically.

Thought I'd share this link to a good report on Emre Can from a few years back.

http://www.newstalk.ie/The-Scouting-Report-The-Future-of-Bayern-Munich

Agree0 Disagree0

No one really knows how a signing is going to work or not; however U21 German Captain and from what I have seen a powerful and skillful player.

Why don't we just see how the season turns out before we write off people.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2014 07:27:24
Wait till after the first 2 games of the season, and then Harry will have plenty of negative things to say about Emre Can.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 18:10:50
Interesting to read that Moreno has said he knows nothing about his move to Liverpool and he is under contract and committed to playing for Sevilla.

Suppose he has to say that though until its a "done deal".

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 18:04:42
Since we signed Can, it has become quite difficult to read some posts here, not because of criticisms but the fact that I often have to read twice to understand if a poster is talking about the player Can or making use of the verb 'can'. Anyways, for my sake, I just hope we don't sign 'Will' Hughes. atleast not this summer!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Dont really know how football transfers can be played around with so bear with me but I would like us to sign him but leave him at Derby for the season with them paying some if not most of his wages. could also give them the option to have him for another season if they secure promotion too

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 22:53:26
We might as well sign Brian May and Charlie Have and we'll be clueless.

Oh hang on. Most of us already are!

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 17:15:01
Tom ince free agent any interest in him eds?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 17:45:12
For free and on low wages I would take him. He won't come back to Liverpool though because he is advised by his father and he won't get first team football week in week out.

Agree0 Disagree0

No thanks, he is nowhere near good enough. Ibe has more potential than Ince. Not to mention his attitude and his father's also.

Red Rum

Agree0 Disagree0

And he'd start for inter? He's not as good as he thinks he is!

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 19:02:26
Anyone could start for Inter.

Agree0 Disagree0

Inter are shocking at the moment. I think Ince could be a good buy for them

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2014 07:26:21
No, we have better players coming through.

Agree0 Disagree0

Looks an Everton signing to me. He'd do well under Bobby Martinez.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 17:08:28
Hi eds, are we actually looking at signing Shaquiri or is it just speculation? I heard that Byern Munchen want him out because V they think he has an attitude. I personaly think he woukd be a great player to have so that we can swap him and sterling around when one gets tired or is Injured or we can play him in another roll?. Your thoughts? Thanks

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - RTFP.}

06 Jun 2014 16:01:09
Edd002, can I ask while you get back to me on accomo what your.l daughter studied at college? If you dont.mind mate or if its too intrusive' thanks

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - She studied Law (but not in London) and is a lawyer in the television business. I spoke with her and she says that you daughter needs to know that London is unlike most university towns so it does not have typical student areas with affordable property, restaurants, bars etc.. She thinks halls might be best until she finds her footing and then share with others she meets at college and it should be a mixed house. She says stay away from South London and if she goes over the river go no further than Kennington as the tube is 80% North of the Thames. She suggests the last remaining affordable area with good transport links is Acton. And that was pretty much it (aside from a message for her mother that made no sense to me). I am not sure that helps much.}

Big Al, I just posted this below your previous query:

Based on this--'She will be.looking through extras so she.could end up in any.university in london'--I would think carefully about what you're planning to do. It sounds like your daughter hasn't actually applied anywhere yet. That means she will have to go through clearing. Most worthwhile undergraduate courses at London universities will already be fully subscribed. Unless she has three straight As at A-Level (in which case universities are free to accept her onto otherwise fully subscribed courses, without prior application—if they want to), it looks like she intends to choose among any remaining courses that will take her.

This is a really bad idea. For almost all courses the fees will be £9k per year. Is she really happy to study something she’s not really interested in, and pay £27k plus living costs (I can’t see any way these will be anything under £600 per month, no matter how many people she shares with) for the privilege? You’re looking at debt of close to £50k at the end of a three-year course, minus any money she’s been able to earn—which won’t be a lot, if she’s planning to spend any time studying.

It would be much better to take 2014-15 as a gap year, spend some or all of it in London, earning some money via bar work etc to pay as much of the cost of living as she can, and meanwhile think through her options carefully. Then she can apply for a course she seriously wants to do—having taken into consideration whether it’s worth the money.

Sorry if I’ve misunderstood something and you know all this, but I’d hate to see you making a mistake that could burden you or your daughter with massive debt for decades. Best of luck whatever she decides to do.

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm one of the batch of students paying 9k per year and suggest your daughter researches her intended course thoroughly because many deem it to be more cons than pros ATM.

I'd also recommend she spends freshers year in hall - the best atmosphere and easily the most affordable. Then move on to a house share with other students in student residence.

Hope it helps a little.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 18:20:28
Ed002 thanks an.absolute million mate and.lemon!
To me it.doesnt look realistic for her. She absolutely loves the city but not being from there and the.costs I am going to have to persuade her stay here or see how things pan.out. i'm going to have to tell her all this but maybe somewhere outside london in.England. London just.looks completely hectic for me and.i don't think.shed cope with the pressure. Thanks again!

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - It has to be a balance man but as a parent you need to let go when trust has been achieved. You trust her and she fouls up, you need to work to ensure it is her problem. You then make it right but not tell her. She will figure it out in the end. And it will be fine.}

Acton is a nice friendly area compared to the centre, lots of Aussies and plenty of suburban houses. I've been a few times and it is very nice

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2014 07:25:37
I lived in West Acton last year while I was working and it is a nice place. Fairly easy and quick to get to Hammersmith or Ealing Broadway. Plenty of tube stations, most of them are Central Line, again making journey to Central London easy (about 40 minutes from North Acton); and at least 2 overground stations.

Good, and affordable for a student.

Agree0 Disagree0

Lived in London for 10 years north and south of the river! I hated it! Too expensive by far. Students have to be nuts to study there. A student will have a much higher quality of life studying in one of the surrounding counties. There is also the option of a train ride into London for days/nights out!

Agree0 Disagree0

Big Al,

I have been in your daughter's situation not long ago. Luckily for me I got on the course I wanted, unluckily for me it turned out I hated the course and wish I'd done something else. However, the fees were not £9K a year like for your daughter.

Right now buddy, it is a difficult situation. When I think of the amount of money I have spent from being 18-26 on fees and living expenses I could be a 100K+ house owner (mortgage paid!)

If she has her heart set on uni, then here is some of my advise regarding which university she picks. I have multiple friends who live, study and have studied in London and there really isn't a ''collective community feel'' anywhere really. It's a large black hole. Most other universities in England/U.K might be more suitable if she is looking for that aspect of university life. Loughborough, Lincoln, Liverpool (ofcourse) spring to mind (going with the L's).

Universities are once again built on money making (like everything else); the issue was because they became too accessible, nowadays having a degree is not rare as it once was. Therefore employer's begun to look at the classification and type of degree.
This is part of the reason why I have studied for a Masters degree.

She would need to consider whether she can see any feasible employment with a degree such as ''history'' and whether it would be worth £27K. A girl who I know has a first in Criminology with Psychology and has only just managed to get a job in a call centre after a year trying to get work.

I don't think it's bad advise for anybody right now (and it's something I wish I had done) for young people to take a year out to work and save some money in prep for uni the following year, and also to seriously think about what they want to do (if they go to uni) and beyond university. Many employer's offer intern-ships and they can be just as valuable (if not more) than university qualifications, nowadays.

Good luck to you both mate.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 16:18:23
Strange how many posts we have had on here over the years about the stadium, either a new one or redevelopment of Anfield, and yet when the club anounce on the website they have applied for planning permission and could start work as early as next year with the main stand ready for 2016/17, nothing?
And yet people will throw out random names, or figures about Suarez.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Indeed.
I agree with you.
This has to be FSG's high point to date.
Surely even their harshest critics would have to acknowledge this achievement?

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 18:46:06
I think we have really good and sensible owners that back the manager and the club in general and have taken our club from ruins. For that Mr Henry and Werner I will always be grateful. Thank god we are going to move forward with the expansion and hopefully our great club will keep moving forward.

Agree0 Disagree0

I know we don't like to discuss money here but I still can't help but feel that financially we have kind of shot ourselves in the foot with our attachment to Anfield. I mean we are only expanding it 9000 seats, now this adds a lot of revenue but from memory its costing us significantly more than it would to just build a new stadium not to mention you could have sold partial naming rights and it wouldve commenced much quicker due to not having to acquire a plethora of privately owned property

having said that i'm ecstatic its finally happened and can't wait til its finished

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - we have no choice on the size, there is no area within the city that is able to cope with more than a 60k stadium. This way we keep costs to a minimum and can work with the council to improve local infrastructure around Anfield to enable a larger capacity in future.}

Ignore what I just said about costs. turns out redev cost circa 150 and new stadium was expected to be 400. only difference is I don't think we can make anfield any larger whereas stanley park was still open for expansion. which let's be honest will need to be done again at some point with us getting champions league again. not to mention if we did end up getting sponsored by some random arab company like the media seemed to think we would then I would expect a small but significant influx of foreign fans

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - you are wrong, Stanley Park comes with the exact same limitations on size.}

@Ed
from memory the council said they couldn't develop Anfield past 60k whereas SP had plans up to 72. I may be wrong

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - you are wrong, that was if the infrastructure was improved. If the infrastructure is improved, then Anfield can also go past 60k. You might want to look on a map and check out exactly where Stanley Park is.....}

The only thing that looking at a map would tell me is that stanley park dwarfs the size of anfield and that anfield is surrounded by roads and houses which as you can expect, restricts growth somewhat. so unless improving infrastructure literally means demolishing the surrounding areas and redirecting roads then yeah fair enough however that further supports the idea we shouldve just built a new stadium across the road

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - seriously? You really don't get it yet? Even when you said exactly what improving the infrastructure would involve, in part, you still try and argue the point? I wonder why we bother sometimes. It wouldn't have taken you five seconds to google what would be involved in improving the infrastructure to allow it to handle more than 60k people. Instead you continue to argue, even when you say yourself that what it involves would change your mind! I really do give up.}

Expanding further is a huge hassle. you either have to acquire more private property behind the centenary or build over anfield road. either way its a huge pain in the arse

also if you think this an argument I feel sorry for you, life must be hard

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 16:15:16
The Only time, The whole site stood on Caroll was on the final day of the season.
We were jumping. praising. caroll. lols.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 16:08:14
If Suarez snubs Real Madrid in-favor of Liverpool, He should be worshiped for Loyalty.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - You seem to have a very short memory.}

06 jun 2014 16:18:45
or might, i move on quick rather than checking the history pages.
the last time i was mocked by a fellow utd supporter was. ". what would a liverpool fan do, when the bulb fuses out.
answer : they wouldn't replace, instead they would convince how good the old bulb was. "
it wasn't funny, but that's its hapening.

Agree0 Disagree0

Harry, I've read your post 4 times and I am non the wiser.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 16:55:09
AL

Good. More from me.

Agree0 Disagree0

Harry, when you say "fellow utd supporter", just clarify that you don't actually support utd right?
Ricky should have made harry famous, not karl p

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 20:31:59
Haha Sandon mate, would be interesting as social experiment #2

Agree0 Disagree0

Is it me or is Harry off his Barnett?

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2014 07:22:11
He is usually like that. Nothing to be concerned about.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Jun 2014 17:39:22
Are you on meds Harry?

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 16:07:14
Bit of a change of pace eds, will Liverpool be scouting at the world cup (I think the obvious answer is yes but just to make sure) and is this scouting going to be done to identify new targets or to keep tabs on any players we are interested in already? Or both?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I am sure someone will keep an eye on what is happening.}

06 Jun 2014 16:01:09
Edd002, can I ask while you get back to me on accomo what your.l daughter studied at college? If you dont.mind mate or if its too intrusive' thanks

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 15:52:04
Ya no what Ed. With what youve said. I fully expect a bid from Madrid and I think he will be gone. Madrid must no what figure it will take. he's 27 now and must feel he will miss the boat soon. Omg how we going to replace him?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 15:10:17
Ed

Is it possible that we could continue our quest for Lallana after the world cup or does it seem BR wants his business done prior? It certainly seems the latter at the minute.

We certainly seem the most active club.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - ICAQAT.}

You're racking up a lot of pointless questions now Dezmondo!

Agree0 Disagree0

What does that even mean ed?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - RTP.}

06 Jun 2014 17:20:42
I can't answer questions about timing.

Agree0 Disagree0

Cheers magic

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 14:43:03
I don't know why people are hell bent on selling Lucas. He is good player and we will need him for cover. Remember before his injury he was 1st name on the team sheet.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Unfortunately for Lucas, 2 seasons of injury have cruelled his game to the point now where the team has surpassed what he is able to offer. Enrique is also in the same boat!

Agree0 Disagree0

Since his injuries he is not though. I hope he stays but only if he can get back to the same level he once was.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 16:12:29
If he decide that it is time to go, i'd let him go with my best wishes. But if he is prepared to stay, wait for his chance and play the odd game I consider him (at current, post injury level) a very good squad. If he can get back to his best, I think he is a superb player. And a starter. Remember him before that first injury in (if I remember correctly) that Chelsea game. For me he was just unplayable. So good. I feel sorry for him after all the stick he got - he stayed and proved his critics wrong and just as he was proving his real quality and consistency he got hit by that injury. Now the critics are coming back and I think often they forget what a player he can be and has been. From the outside, he seems to be a nice guy, it seems like he is well liked in the squad and I imagine (speculation I know) that he is not amongst the highest earners. Paired with his current ability and his potential ability I think he is a very good player for our squad. And if he goes, I think we will need a replacement. We'll never know for sure how good the replacement will be. And I do not like the thought of bringing in to many players - 4, maybe 5 okay, but anything above that is to much for my taste.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 16:20:37
Kopkings

No one is having a go at Lucas, If wanna keep him do it like with downing and eventually sell at 15 mill loss.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 16:34:07
Lavije

I admire your reply, But The best period of Lucas which you mentioned under KK, Was the worst time we played football after Hodgson.
Charlie Adam, Downing, Caroll, Maxi, Henderson were all the names on the pitch. Gerrard was poor. Even Suarez was missing from all sides.
But Today, We have a brilliant team and I don't see any way Lucas getting ahead of anyone unless its an injury.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ive always backed lucas, but the worst thing that happened to him personally was stevie g playing the holding role this last few months and showing what more someone could do in that position

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 23:58:28
You are right home fan, we weren't that good when he played at his best and maybe with the kind of football we play now he will never be an automatic starter. I am confusing myself thinking about it - I cannot decide what to think. Maybe, maybe not? But I do feel that it is even more difficult to play at the level he did in a team with the players you where mentioning and the form they where in. So I give him huge credit for that. He was so strong on the ball and he always looked ahead of his opponent in his speed of thought - I think that is what a few years with injury have taken away from him. Unfortunately I think the injuries have broken him beyond repair - I think we will never see the "best" Lucas again. But I do hope so. Theoretically, if he was at his absolute best, like before the injuries, I do not think he would start every game. But I like the idea of a spine: the keeper, one or two centre backs, suarez, gerrard for as long as his legs can carry him. and then the rest rotating depending on the who we play and how we set up. Like the way Allen, Coutinho and Sterling where competing for two places in the latter half of the season. If I could add Lucas Leiva at his best to those 3 players in rotation for two places - i'd be very pleased.

At current ability I still rate him as a very usefull squad player. He will be strong competition for the other players in the same position, reliable if called upon and have the quality to go in and do a job in the odd game or in case of suspensions or injuries, he will add to the quality in training (very important one), he will (hopefully) give encouragement to the starters but show eagerness and ambitions about being a starter, he will be part of a strong and settled group that I think we should be careful of disrupting after a brilliant season and maybe, just maybe - some players manage to get back to their best after long injury lay offs some doesn't - he could become a very important player for us again - in rotation with other very important players.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 14:38:52
I've got a question that I want to put forward to everyone, Just general banter between folks

I've read a few stories down that people would be willing to sell Suarez, For what ever amount.
My question is why?

Why sell your best player, to someone we will compete against next year (If we draw Real)
Why make their squad bloody brilliant?
I know it'll be a lot of money for what we get for him, But if you wanna be the best you have to keep the best, Real wouldn't sell Ronaldo.
I personally think as my opinion that we should keep Suarez (let just say he wants to stay even if real come in, hypothetically) plus the players we already have and buying, And Suarez I think we'll be an amazing force to reckon with.

What are your thoughts? Am I being deluded lol?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Funny you use Ronaldo as an example because he was kicking up such a fuss at United they had to sell him.
If Suarez starts chucking his toys out the pram again he will be gone.

Agree0 Disagree0

I used Ronaldo as I personally think he is RM best player, Not because of circumstance.
And I was stating if Suarez was devoted to staying with LFC would fans still cash in on him?

Wanted a bit of banter didn't mean to cause offence, my apologises.

Agree0 Disagree0

I would sell him for either:
a) A world record fee of at least £90m
b) At least £60million cash plus a player of the Sanchez, Di Maria mould.

Agree0 Disagree0

If a player want to leave and an acceptable offer is made then realisticly he has to go. why keep anyplayer if he's asked to go?

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 22:31:19
If Suares wants to leave this summer to RM we should give him the chance to leave. But put into perspective - the price of Bale, Suarez scored more goals and made more assists than him. Put in perpective Lallana priced at 30 million. What price is Suarez? I would say nothing less than 100 million Euros at the current market value

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 14:51:41
I like brad jones, I think he's been a great servant to the club, barely played in the years he had been here but never has said a bad word against the club. However, I dread to think if our no1 gets injured in the champions league and we have to start him against one of the big guns. Unless we have a youngster coming through who I haven't heard about, then I just don't see him bring the answer

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Great why don't you knock him out and while he's down kick him in the nuts, slag slag slag that's all half of the posters do on here against our own players.

Agree0 Disagree0

@Reusch
he didn't even slag him off. Brad Jones just isn't of Liverpool quality

Agree0 Disagree0

Jones is a very, very capable goalkeeper. I'd have no worries.

Agree0 Disagree0

Brad Jones has never let us down. I hope he plays more games next year, he deserves it.

I'd doubt that any genuine top-class goalkeeper would want to sit as an understudy at any club tbh.

Jones has been very professional and understands his role well. I'm sure he could do a great job as a first choice at a lot of other teams, but he loves LFC and is living his dream.

However, I'd like to see us develop a few good options at youth level. I know that young Ward is thought of as a decent prospect, having been capped for Wales youth sides at all levels.

Does anyone here have any insightful views on who would be the best youth level goalkeeper at the club? Is there anyone that Mignolet might start to worry about a few years down the line?

Agree0 Disagree0

I haven't exactly slagged him off now have I! The facts are, he's played 8 games in 4 years, can't really say he's been good! There must be something lacking if we haven't even given him a cup run! I'm not suggesting we buy a world class sub, but I'm sure there's someone with a little more experience. The likes of brad friedel is sub for spurs and he has been a top goaly for years! Okay yes maybe we need someone a bit younger but I'm sure there are similar players out there to sit as number 2 until a youth player is ready, just in case out number 2 gets an injury

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 14:11:45
Is Enrique likely to be sold Eds? Anyone interested?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - UTSF.}

06 Jun 2014 14:27:08
He will have to play some games to have some interest in him.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 14:05:00
Liverpool will play Borussia Dortmund in August and the following players
Hummels
Subotic
Bender
Mkhitaryan
Gundogan
Reus
Aubameyang
Will all play the first half for Dortmund and the second half for Liverpool after they all sign 5 year deals at half time

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Sorry Chris, but at least two of those players will be gone from Dortmund by then. The others I agree will.}

Apparently they will take Aspas Lucas skrtel Johnson and mignolet as a direct swap, and they will give is an added 15 million for agger

Agree0 Disagree0

That old rumour chestnut Chris, they play the first half for the other team and second half for us after signing at half time. Has that actually ever happen I wonder? (Eds?). No doudt there will be smoke canisters thrown on to the pitch to to create a smoke screen so that we could sign some extra players without the ever watchful eyes of the Spurs scouts.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - It happens many times each year in the eyes of Liverpool supporters.}

No Ed you only THINK 2 of these will be gone, that is actually a smokescreen

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - At least two Chris.}

Players most likely to leave are hummels, reus, gundogan

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Two out of three isn't bad.}

I imagine Ayre and Brendan will have the van sorted, so that the smokescreen hides us chucking the Dortmund team into the van and forcing them to sign.

Mamadou Sakho will provide the muscle, and if that fails to intimidate then Coutinho will have to perform a rendition of Westlife's "Flying Without Wings" until they surrender and sign.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 13:34:53
Just seen the confirmation of the Borussia Dortmund friendly.

Do any Eds or reds know what usually happens in terms of tickets sales for these sort of Friendlies? Do they go on general sale or is it to Season ticket holders, members etc first?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 13:15:22
Red Dawn

I read your post at Southampton page regarding Lallana. He would be the best player in England for the next 6/7 years?
He is 26, Who was the last player with good dribbling skills and movment at 34?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Giggs could still run past the odd player, and showed decent movement and he was 39. Just because there haven't been a plethora of players who have been technically boss at 34 doesn't mean Lallana doesn't have the capacity to do it. He doesn't rely on speed, so basically when he hits his peak he'll just have improved the technical aspects of his game even more, he might slow down a little bit more going into his 30s but doesn't mean he wouldn't still be able to get past a few players with his ability.

JFT 96

JP

Agree0 Disagree0

Doesn't have to have good dribbling skills at 34. Gerrard does a hell of a job for Liverpool, as Lampard did for Chelsea.

A player's game can adapt over time and I think Lallana has the skills to adapt, like Gerrard has, especially with BR's influence.

Agree0 Disagree0

If he is 26 then in the next 6/7 years he will be 32, 33.

Ribery will turn 32 and Robben will turn 31 during next season.

They are pretty decent dribblers with good movement.

Agree0 Disagree0

Lets face it lallana is neither ribery nor robben.

Agree0 Disagree0

I am nearly 60 and for years, well into my 50s, my dribbling skills were great. Ended up being told to wipe my chin to avoid getting a rash

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 16:11:03
Hyach

I agree, Lallana had just a season, Ribery and Robben have been at the top of their game from years.

Agree0 Disagree0

Out with the calculator there I'd say Harry

Agree0 Disagree0

Harry lallana had more then1 good season hence why we tried to sign him before

Agree0 Disagree0

Haych

The question was:

"Who was the last player with good dribbling skills and movment at 34?"

I wasnt comparing Lallana to them.

I was pointing out that players in their early to mid 30's can still play their usual game if its based on dribbling and movement.

Agree0 Disagree0

Gianfranco Zola and Peter Beardsley were still fantastic at 34.

Johan Cruyff too (but he was a god, not a player).

Giggs was less than average at 34, his relationship with/loyalty to Fergie let him stay much longer than his ability as a player merited. His 'dribbling' was rarely a feature of his overly cautious approach at the time.

Some players get better with age.

Pace isn't everything, but a lot of the best players rely on it heavily. Ronaldo, Messi and Bale certainly do, though they would undoubtedly still be good players without it.

In the case of Suarez, I reckon that he will improve with age.

He could nutmeg a lamp-post.

Lucky us eh!

As for Lallana. He's not on the same level as any of the players mentioned. I can't see him as a regular for LFC at 34.

Just being honest. A player needs to be pretty special to be a regular for a top side at that age.

Lallana is a good player, but he isn't special.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 12:08:34
independent reporting that man city have poached 2 of our coaches (steven torpey and darren hughes) for their new academy and already have rodolfo borrel who we let go last year (i always read great things about borrel, but you can't complain about our youth setup judging by last season.)

very happy with transfer dealings so far. We must have one of the most versatile squads in the prem. We have strikers who can play centrally or out wide (glad we're keeping borini, he'll get a few games, ) wingers who can play centrally, plenty of midfield options (if we sell lucas i'd like to see us get in a bargain DM like diame, not sure Can is ready to play every game yet, ) and plenty of defensive options.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 12:01:31
McGoveb, I saw yesterday you want us to sign a British centre back. Who would you choose though? There aren't many to choose from.

Cahill, Terry, Jagielka, Caulker, Smalling, A.Williams (Welsh) and that's it. I'd love Cahill, but that won't happen. Terry is too old. Jagielka is too injury prone. Caulker is good but is he any better than Kelly/Wisdom? Smalling is awful and a Man U player. A.Williams is not much better (if at all) than Skrtel.

I agree that in the past Britain has always had the best centre backs. Terry, Ferdinand, Carragher, S.Campbell, Adams, Thompson, Hansen, Lawro, Moore etc. Britain tend to produce good defenders in general. However the current crop is pretty average Cahill aside. So who would you want?

I am of the opinion that Lovren or Chedjou are the best players for our system right now who might be attainable (might being the key word). Varane would be possible if we got him as part of a Suarez sale? I'd take Varane along with some cash (that I'd use to buy Sanchez) for Suarez, but I doubt everybody would agree.

I think we just need a leader at the back who is powerful and reads the game well, preferably with some pace. Ilori isn't ready to be relied on yet in my opinion. If the centre back we sign is younger than Sakho I think he could be the leader. It's always awkward for younger players shouting at people older than them though. If the player is older than Sakho though, they simply have to be a leader of men. Lovren is made to partner Sakho in my opinion though and whilst Varane would be the dream signing, it isn't going to happen without some casualties at the other end of our team.

Interested to hear your reply though mate.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 12:38:26
If I had the chance, Cahill for me. I think He has been chelsea's best signing. Superb player, Very humble.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hi, first time poster here. Enjoyed reading the site for a while and have been meaning to join and post, and this post I've decided to reply to.

I disagree about Britain having the best centre backs, in my opinion the best centre backs have always come from Italy. Baresi, Cannavaro, Nesta, Scirea, Rava, Gentile, Ferrara, Costacurta, Rosetta, Bergomi, is I think a much better collection than England or Britain could put together.

I'm also pleased with the balance we have with UK and foreign players, so don't think we need to go for a British player in particular for any position, unless of course one is available and good enough.

Finally, hello again and I hope to have a good few convos with you all and a bit of banter along the way!

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 13:02:14
Totti is a legend. When asked about joining another club, He said " I have had offers from Real twice, But I rejected it both. I was taught at school, When your parents grow old, you wouldn't replace them with anyone else, Instead you remain with them."

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree Harry. Cahill is completely unattainable though. There is literally zero chance Chelsea will sell him.

I do apologise Totti as I completely agree with you. "Best" was the wrong word. Whilst Britain has always produced 'great' centre backs, you are very right that Italy have by and large had the best. (West) Germany have had their fair share as well, including the best ever defender in my opinion, Beckenbaur. A very good point though and I also agree with you that we don't necessarily need to buy British. I'd be more than happy with just a player who fits the system and is better than what we curretnly have.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 13:28:11
YNWAdam�

Nice one mate. I was alos dissapointed, We didn't go for Johnes. He too would have been an excellent signing.
Chelsea signed Cahil for 7 mill. Its a steal. Excellent defender.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - if you mean Phil Jones, we did go for him and agreed a deal with Blackburn, but he rejected us to join United.}

06 Jun 2014 13:31:56
Whats Totti got to do with centre halves? confused!

Agree0 Disagree0

The only English / British centre halves worth their salt, in world terms, over the past couple of generations are Campbell, Ferdinand, King (if it wasn't for injuries). Can't think of anyone else.
The common denominator - pace.
Phil Jones could be, for me, just playing in the wrong team (club and national).
If he was Brazilian, he'd be at Barca or Real.

Agree0 Disagree0

I don't really rate Phil Jones as a defender. I think he's an English David Luiz. Looks a good defender on paper but just cannot apply it. Like Luiz, I think he's better when he's played in midfield. I certainly wouldn't want him in my defence though. He was all over the place against Ecuador!

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 14:29:29
YNWAdam

Against Equador, Luke shaw looked like a reserve player and Milner was terrible at its very best. Smallling looke another poor player.
The only stood out was Oxlde and Barkley.

Agree0 Disagree0

Haha like it.
EMS, if by central defender you mean sits deep, Alamo-style last ditch, heads everything out, then OK.
But you're about to see higher line centre halves that can bring the ball out, run and play, have athletic full backs either side of them, and a technical but industrial midfield in front.
Roy Hodgson is England's Ally MacLeod. Lol.

Agree0 Disagree0

Really like, Jones is no where near the level to play at Barcelona and Madrid. His failure to kick on is seen as one of the reasons behind Uniteds poor season. Just because a defender has pace doesn't make him a world beater, on top of this slow players can still play with a high line.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 11:48:41
Reports that we have told real that Suarez is available for 90m? This better not be true

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 12:25:44
I read that today, But how could we sell someone of his price is beyond me. Or might be a stuppid news.

Agree0 Disagree0

We could maybe make up for his goals with Sanchez & Pedro who have outstanding goal scoring records.
But there more attacking wide mids/strikers.
We would also need a central striker just incase sturridge gets injured, falcao is available but he seems a bit of a trouble maker.

The prices for these players would go up as teams know we will have the 90m so getting all three would not really be possible.

The club will be making a huge mistake.

Agree0 Disagree0

We would be stupid to turn down £90m for him. That is a serious amount of money. Personally though I'd ask for ~£65m plus Raphael Varane. Varane and Sakho could be our centre back pairing for a decade and the fact they'd play together for France too would be a massive bonus. Playing with a younger fellow country man would allow Sakho to be the leader he is meant to be as well.

We'd then have £65m to sign a Suarez replacement. Hopefully rather than make the same mistake Tottenham did, we would sign a single replacement though. Sanchez would do me, and then we'd probably have some change to service the debts or cover the other transfer costs we are likely to incur this summer. Suarez is 27 now and has just suffered his first proper injury of his career. History would suggest a string of injuries will follow, although Suarez is stronger than the likes of Torres and Owen.

Don't get me wrong, I'd love to keep Suarez, but if we get a mega offer from Real Madrid, we need to look at the bigger picture. Sanchez is only 24 and who knows? In 3 years he might score 30+ goals for us.

We are in no financial position to refuse money like that though. We are pretty much guaranteed to fail FFP next season unless we win the treble!

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - You guys are just making all of these numbers up - it needs to stop.}

Every player has a price. Not saying he should or will go but 90 million! that is a lot of good players! For that you could buy 2 excellent strikers and another highly rated player, if not 2

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 13:20:23
Sanchez is nailed on to Juve unless something drastic happens. Falcao has ruled out himself for any transfer. Pedro would be realestic with the money we have. His goal scoring stats are from a team which is the best in planet.
Its Incredibly difficult to replace someone who has Just bagged 30 goals and 13 assist. And If we experiment with this, W e would drop out from CL next seaosn.
Lets not sell him and try to win a trophy next season.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - That is simply not true about Sanchez.}

06 Jun 2014 13:24:48
Adam

Sanchez would be scoring 30+ goals for Juve in 3 years. Juventus would somehow agree a fee with barca. He wants to move to barca.
Y Would Varane come to Liverpool from Real?
All those bench warmers at Real and Barca are not needed as a part of Suarez deal. And all those starters wouldn't come to us.
That would leave us to sign players from outside. let's keep aside, Bayern, Real, PSG, City, Cheslea, UTD, Barca, and Juventus.
Which club is left to buy from?

Agree0 Disagree0

If the figure is correct - not sure it is; I think Suarez would want to go and with that sort of money I think we would have to sell.

Figures apart I'd probably keep the same targets we have in mind and then go for Sanchez and another forward; any money left over should off set the rest of the transfer spending this year.

I'd agree with Varane, maybe Morato and cash if possible.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 13:28:03
Remember when Tottenham sold Bale? Got a large amount of money and decided 8-9 "good" players are better than 1 world class one? How did that work out?

Long story short, i'd rather have Suarez then a big sum of money, no-one in the world can play like him.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 13:46:11
EPL is very physical and a very difficult league to settle, Unless you are brilliant. All those new comers especially from other leagues would take 2 years to settle down ( We have examples ). By the time Spurs or UTD would drag us down and we would be outside the Top4.
I would simply be Levy and snubb their offer.
Spurs are lucky. Bale isn't half as Suarez. We are talking about Genius not world class.
What we need is just 4 players, We have already bought 2 of them.

Agree0 Disagree0

I read the site everyday and these posts are slightly annoying.

Ballpark figures for Suarez and ''I'd swop him for this this or this'' or ''I'd use the money for this, this or this''.

When we sold Torres for 50Million - remember what happened there - we flunked 35Million on a player who wasn't suitable for us.

Cheers

Agree0 Disagree0

Thats true but spurs did not buy great players at all. They purchased players with inflated prices and reputations largely and got too many new players in

Agree0 Disagree0

If he goes he goes and he owes us nothing, great times we had watching him but players come and go toshack keegan daglish rush aldrigde owen fowler torres suarez the list will go on and on, what I am trying to say we will always get new players and with 90 plus million we have made on the deal for once. I would like him to stay but if he wants to go good luck to him and we move on

Agree0 Disagree0

We have a better team without Suarez now than spurs did without bale! If he left, we wouldn't need a whole team, but probably just 1 striker, 1 winger and centre back and maybe a goaly if if we had funds left! Spurs bought too many players at nice and didn't ship out ebough, so they're squad was massive. Then they found it hard to play their inform players without upsetting some of the others, some of whom barely got a chance outside of Europa league

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 15:30:16
As long as we don't blow it on someone like Andy Carroll

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 16:13:38
Conibicks

1 striker, 1 winger and center back and maybe a goaly
Over the top of 2 completed signings and Lallana.
Mate, That's almost 7 first team players.

Agree0 Disagree0

90 million is a massive amount of money. I'm not a great business minded person but I guess that kind of money would at least make the owners think

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Why not guess at the currency to go with the guessed at number?}

06 Jun 2014 11:19:33
Not really a rumour, but a friend of mine out in Miami has been told unequivocally that no deals for the England players will be discussed with the players themselves until after the World Cup, but that a number of agents and representatives have been left with responsibility to try and get as much as possible sorted as possible if sales have been agreed between clubs. In some cases leaving only the signature to be appended to the bottom of the contract if possible.

Don't for one minute think that just because the World Cup is happening that business stalls, we are just unlikely to hear about it until afterwards.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 10:52:34
Agger on his way to Napoli has told close friends that he wants to go and they have been in talk with Liverpool shame really because our defensive record with Danny in the team is much better and the lad loves the club, just think if he hadn't of been on lark lane as much could have been a Sami for us.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

If true, sad to see him go, but I wish him all the best, he deserves it for everything he has done for us. loyal players will be allowed to leave if they wish to.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 10:29:18
Recent word is that Ayre has been in Barcelona trying to negotiate a deal for either Sanchez or Pedro, eventhough these deals have been seen as a 'long shot'. However, it seems we are willing to include Agger as a makeweight in the deal. Juventus are the other team involved with Sanchez but they aren't willing to go above 18m, which means am sure we could easily beat that offer. You know anything about this?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Twitter is this? See earlier answers.}

06 Jun 2014 12:30:08
Ed002, It is Kike Marin. I don't know if he is reliable.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - I have no idea what that means - but I don't want people asking us about things the read on Twitter. The Liverpool page is being dragged down enough already.}

06 Jun 2014 10:13:59
Hi All,

Probably one for the Eds if any of them have time.

We know that a group of European teams meet regularly and one of their topics of conversation is usually the move to a Pan-European super league.

On a similar note, do you ever envisage a time when national FA's have become so disenfranchised with FIFA that they consider forming a breakaway group?

Cheers in advance

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I hold a reasonably strong view in terms of the need to restructure football in Europe in any case. For me an eventual a breakaway pan-European league would force the restructuring of many of the national leagues, possibly resulting in a British league with perhaps only a couple of professional tiers and then regionalised amateur leagues below that. Financially I do not see that so many pro sides can be sustained within the sport which, like it or not, will see more and more money going in to the highest levels of the game. Governments will ensure that grassroot sports get funding but everything in the middle (Southern, Northern, Conference, Division 2, Scottish Divisions 1-3, League of Wales will not get the funding needed to continue on any sort of professional basis. For me, clubs should already recognise this and put their efforts in to getting back to the SPL in order to secure an eventual place in the top two tiers of a British professional league that will need to flourish without perhaps six sides that have gone down the pan-European route - and have gone for good.}

06 Jun 2014 12:30:39
FIFA got a right pasting on Question Time last night. There was consensus from all the politicians and audience on the need to reform it.
The decisions to host both the 2018 and 22 World Cups should be absolutely thoroughly investigated.
And I hope Ed002 that someone from your profession proves worthy. It really would be the football equivalent of Watergate.
Sadly many of the world's premium newspapers and outlets are intrinsically linked to the current football set-up.
I hope an organisation such as the Press Association or Reuters could perhaps push ahead

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 13:28:27
Cheers for the response Ed002 very detailed, very interesting.

From a selfish Liverpool fan's point of view we need to find a way to be involved in those discussions. Being left out of such a league would be a horrible feeling.

What about the international side Ed002? Do you ever see national FAs breaking away from FIFA for their own national association (perhaps a for-profit one) or is it just never going to happen?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Without going in to too much detail: (a) A number of clubs take the opportunity a once or twice a year to discuss various issues including changes in rules, television rights, the power of UEFA, exploitation issues for new technology streams, etc.. These discussions, the last of which were in late March in Monte Carlo, also always turn to the possibility and structure of a breakaway pan European league. Several are ex-G14 clubs, several are not, and some clubs decline involvement in such discussions. (b) The plan is that at some point a number of clubs would break away from their national leagues and UEFA. They accept that they would be banned from all existing club competition and the players would initially be banned from all FIFA competitions as well, but know that FIFA would be looking to negotiate in any case. It would be the end of UEFA in all probability and UEFA are very aware of this. It would also result in a restructuring of many of the national leagues. (c) The clubs would renegotiate their television rights, rights of distribution via other streams etc.. (d) It remains the greatest fear of UEFA and all major national authorities that one day this will happen.

There is every likelihood that the big money from television, sponsorship etc. would go with a breakaway league. It would completely rupture the operations of UEFA and I would expect it would require national associations like the FA to restructure their leagues. Nobody wants this but it is the eventual consequence I would expect. If I had to speculate, I would think (1) you might eventually see something like five or six EPL teams leave for two-tier pan European league; (2) the Premier League would be disbanded as an organisation; (3) the FA would restructure in to two 20 team divisions with lower leagues regionalised as they were many years ago; (4) FIFA would ban all players from the breakaway teams from International football - perhaps rescinding that position to stop FIFA breaking up as well. I could also see many teams lose their professional status. I would think we are probably 10 years away from any significant move at this time.}

If it does happen we have to be in it imo

Agree0 Disagree0

Those away games are going to cost a small fortune. Can't imagine the away crowds are going to be too big anywhere for an average league game unless you can afford to go to Greece one Saturday and Germany the next.

Agree0 Disagree0

Cheers for all the responses Ed.

Would certainly be a shake up. Can see a lot of clubs being very upset.

Would this new league allow two teams from the same city or maybe encourage mergers?

City/United
Inter/AC
Atletico/Real
Chelsea/Arsenal

If you have a 20 team league from across Europe doesn't really make sense to have 2 or 3 teams from one City. Much like American sports, maybe a franchise system would work, with only the largest cities being allowed 2 teams.

With regards to the international side of things though. Can you envisage a time where there are worldwide competitions for countries, outside of FIFA/UEFA.

A breakaway group of countries for example, entering a World Football Championship or something similar?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Nobody is looking at mergers. None of the clubs care about International games.}

Cheers Ed

I think we may have gone off piste a little bit.

I was more wondering whether the national FA's would ever consider breaking away from FIFA in a similar way that clubs consider breaking away from UEFA?

Cheers

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - When this happens the whole structure will need to change - nobody really cares about International football - it will have to pick up the pieces later on.}

06 Jun 2014 18:19:13
Ed002 what would this pan-European league consist of? Like a replacement for the champions league? Or just the best teams play each other every week? These are just guessed I had no idea this was a discussion!

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - A replacement for the CL and the high end European sides.}}

06 Jun 2014 10:16:09
I think it would only be right to comment on how Southampton are dealing with this summer so far.

All this talk of them "refusing to negotiate" or "holding us to ransom" is total "rubbish" as the Eds would put it.

The club have acted incredibly admirably throughout.

They have said they are waiting for a manager to come in before getting to business with transfers, they have set a price for their players and they have stuck to it, no messing around just "pay it or don't."

Then just to top it all, they make an exception for an immensely hard working player who has given his all for them, to live out his childhood dream and move home. They didn't have to do that.

Fair play to Southampton, truly impressed with the way they are conducting themselves.

I really hope we do get Lallana, I think he will be one of England's best players for 6/7 years, but either way I wish Soton all the best.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 10:30:05
We shouldn't be botherd, What they do with him. If none matches their Valuation They would have an unhappy player with them, And with No CL next seaosn, We would get him at half price next seaosn.
He is brilliant, surrounded with some real quality players and with a good attack minded manager. let's see If he replicates next seaosn under a new manager with almsot half of the squad would be off.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Half price eh?}

Did you copy and paste this from 3 days ago?

Agree0 Disagree0

You should post this a few times more. I don't think 2 or 3 times is enough so far ;-)

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 12:29:24
Yes, Pato for ex

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 12:58:26
Why's Pato an example?

Agree0 Disagree0

Thanks for replying everyone, for info I only sent this once, not my fault if it has been posted twice.

Cheers all

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 13:30:26
ART

AC Milan snubbed big money offers for Pato and In 12 months, he was out of favour at Milan due to injuries and was entually sold to Brazil.

Agree0 Disagree0

Whys that the same? He went back to brazil because he wasn't good enough for Milan because his injuries affected him?! He wasn't the best player in his team chased by other clubs in the last year? In no way does that relate to lallana unless he gets injured frequently then I'm sure clubs would lose interest him him then.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 09:55:15
Eds.with a suspected bid to come in for suerez this summer, do you think the club made him sign a long term contract in december so the club could get more money for him .reddave ynwa

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I would steer clear of his contract. Liverpool will want to hang on to him but as I have said before, he may well see this summer as the best opportunity to move to a club which interests him.}

06 Jun 2014 09:54:11
Acc to tuttosport (Italian)
Juventus have a agreed a 4 year deal with Sanchez worth €4m a year. Only £65k a week. But they aren't willing to pay more than 18million.

Surely its worth a try? We could give bigger wages and offer a higher fee and include Anger/Reina in the deal.
Ian Are is reportedly in Barca right now, so there's a chance.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - You need to ignore all of these numbers and some naïve idea that Barcelona would want Liverpool's cast offs.

There has been interest from Juventus in Sanchez and there is no secret that his agent has confirmed that they would be willing to meet the terms that the player desires. However, they are far from agreeing a figure with Barcelona for the sale - very far indeed. The figure that Barcelona want is beyond the means of Juventus unless they sell Vidal or Pogba.

If Mr Ayre is in Barcelona talking about Sanchez it will likely be as a replacement for Suarez. Would that be OK?}

06 Jun 2014 10:47:19
Are Real going to be able to make a realistic offer for LFC?
Usually there biggest signings (Bale Ronaldo Beckham Figo) are ones which can bring in a lot of commercial revenue (shirt sales/advertising) but Suarez isn't a very popular player throughout the world and comes with a bad reputation.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - You should stay clear of all financial and commercial stuff. They will certainly be making an offer.}

I like the idea of including Anger with the deal, throw in some venom, and bile, and maybe these boards would be a lot easier to manage for the Eds.

Agree0 Disagree0

Like Lallana at Southampton. Suarez has a long contract with us and for us to accept a bid it needs to be a world record. So with that kinda money i'd take it. We can bye Sanchez, Varane, Lovren, Lallana, Clyne and Begovic to add to Moreno, Lambert and Can for e.g.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Another year of transition then.}

06 Jun 2014 12:25:32
Sound just like a Spurs fan from last year, Chris T!

I can see why BR wants transfers done quickly, but when Suarez is seen to be on his way how many top players will join LFC?

Agree0 Disagree0

Bad publicity is still, publicity. youd think that the bad reputation he has wouldev made him less popular. well you're wrong.

whether he was good or bad, its up to you to decide, but Hitler is a good example, he has a very bad reputation. But how many people in the world atleast knows his name?

what I said has nothing to do with the transfer, just commenting on mcdevtingz comment.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hitler and Suarez share many similarities.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 09:21:21
A question for all posters
seeing as we are reportedly close to signing a new left back (hopefully moreno) and with jon Flanagan and glen Johnson (br rates him and we are not going to find any buyer's) there is room for only one more fullback
so out of KELLY and WISDOM who would you want to see with us next season and what would you fo with the other (sell or loan)?

I would personally loan out Kelly as he need game time as he has struggled with injuries and keep wisdom?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I'd keep Wisdom and Kelly. I get the feeling BR wants to sell Johnson

Agree0 Disagree0

Wisdom, he bossed it at Derby and now has a shed load more experience. Considering Kelly (understandably) isn't back to his old form, he would probably benefit from a loan like you said, not only for his fitness but also his confidence which seems lacking when he has played on the few occasions last season. Got my fingers crossed for the lad though.

JFT 96

JP

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 09:57:47
Johnson's time is up at level we r at and hopefully stay at cl football.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 09:39:07
We were always going to buy a LB and hence I was pretty sure Wisdom won't be at LFC next season. People will say he can cover CB, but we will likely have 4 senior CBs at LFC next year and Martin Kelly. I suspect Wisdom will be sold.

Kelly will stay as cover and I think a decision will be made on him, along with Johnson and Enrique and half the CBs at the club, next summer.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 10:22:06
i would see how johnson does at the WC.
that will give us a good idea if he is up to the CL.
or the shop window might even convince someone to come in for him

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 10:33:30
Johnson would do well in the World Cup or any game with then National side or else he would loose his place.

Agree0 Disagree0

Keep Kelly and LOAN Wisdom again. He's already a good player and he will only get better, one more season on loan could help him progress even further. Maybe a PL club might be willing to take him with guaranteed game time this season but otherwise back to Derby or the likes.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 jun 2014 09:14:04
there's a lot of speculation about our defence at the moment . particularly at cb.
personally speaking, skrtel scares the bejeesus out of me, agger is class but slow and loses his opponent too easily sometimes and glen johnson has always been better going forward but even that quality has started to elude him lately. coates has sadly proven not good enough, toure is bench at best and kelly is made of the finest delicate porcelain.classy but fragile!
assuming we make some big changes in defensive areas this window, i wouldn't complain if we submitted the following as first-teamers for 2014/15;
flanagan(rb/lb), kelly(cb/rb), johnson(rb/lb/m),
sakho(cb), llori(cb), wisdom(cb/rb), moreno(lb/rb), caulker(cb), toure(cb/dm).
i'm assuming we sell enrique, coates, skrtel, agger and maybe a youngster or two over the next two windows.
with a few tweaks we could have a very competent defence and i hope sincerely that we do whatever's needed to make that happen. personally, i think letting steve clarke go was a huge mistake!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Replace Caulker with Lovren and I'd be happy with that.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 09:12:38
Hey eds
well I sent in my world cup predictions but they have not been posted
have they been taken away for the new page or will I have to send em in again

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I have no idea. Send them in again. Don't expect to see them on the Banter page.}

06 Jun 2014 10:00:26
Where do we see everyone's picks ed.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - No idea, no doubt someone will say at some point and I would guess it will have a page of its own.}

06 Jun 2014 09:04:33
Good morning Eds and Reds,

Greeting you warm wishes from sunny Kosovo.

Who would you reds rather sign, Lallana or Shaqiri? My opinion is split, I feel both would fit in well. However, as Shaqiri heralds from Kosovo I would love to see us sign him, the Kosovars would go nuts.

On a separate (but linked) note, if we do actually close the deal for Moreno and Can, coupled with Lambert and possibly Lallana/Shaqiri, what a window already. who, if any, would you like to sign?

Does anybody else think we now have a lot of CM's?

Cheers,

Kosovo Joe

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 09:40:13
I think if we sign one of Lallana/Shaqiri, a Center back and Moreno, that would be it for this summer.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 11:46:27
AG , I normally agree with your posts , but we must buy a goalkeeper , we can't possibly start next season with Mignolet and Brad Jones .

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 07:25:43
Hi Eds (and specifically Ed002),

Following on the same kind of topic from Big Al (I think it was earlier) I was wondeing if you and the fans on here could give me a bit of advice.

I'm thinking of a gap year - but information online tends to be to sell you deals rather than picking the best option. Is a gap year a sensible idea? And where's best? I'm thinking of travelling through Europe before setting up in Eastern Europe to work.

I'm only posting here as I couldn't find any other relevant site where I could ask the Eds.

As always thanks to you all Eds - I know how much work you put in. How your all keeping well!

Cheers,

B

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Hi Burnsy. I am sure you can get better advice from others rather than me. The concept of "gap years" did not really exist when I was at that age. I went right from school to the University of California Berkeley where I did a four year course. I left with no intention of further education at the time but subsequently (a couple of years later) was "sponsored" to move to London for work and a Masters - but I worked in the intervening years. Neither of my daughters took a gap year but many of their friends did - I recall a couple not returning to England afterwards. I would guess it is down to the individual, and where you wish to travel to. As for Eastern Europe, I don't know it well and the rules for working and setting up businesses will vary country-by-country. The countries I have been to vary considerably and I have not noticed any that I would with to settle in for any length of time. You will need to do some research but I am sure others here can help.}

06 Jun 2014 09:27:46
I am on an enforced Gap-year (and a half) now; it has been largely boring especially since I am preparing for an Generalized Test.

The biggest advantage is that you can sleep as long as you want.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - I am assuming it was physiology you flunked. I think you will find that you can rot in bed "as long as you want" but other factors decide the length of time the body can sleep for.}

Depends mate
1) Have you done a degree/masters or are you just out of school?
2) do you have full eu citizenship

3) do you have a vast sum of money behind you or will you be working part time and scrimping throughout.

I just took a year out after finishing school last year but that was only so I could work for the year so I could afford to go to college and that certainly has been good for me anyway.

Agree0 Disagree0

A couple of my mates went travelling together on a gap year round Eastern Europe a few years ago weirdly enough. They absolutely loved it, the only issue they came across was when one of them ran out of money and had to contact his parents for them to get him a ticket to fly home, as long as you're able to set a budget and stick to it then I'd say it would be a great idea. The one place they said to avoid is Transylvania, apparently they didn't feel very 'welcome' there and left pretty much immediately, although maybe that was just their own experience. One of them also said if anyone has the chance on their travels they should go to Dubrovnik, apparently it's stunning.

JFT 96

JP

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 11:08:03
As always Ed002, thanks hugely for the detailed reply.

Fortunately for me The real AG, the gap year isn't enforced for me but an option.

ShaneK: 1) I'll be straight out of a-Levels.
2) Yes
3) I was planning on save now - wee bit of travel. Settle in Eastern Europe to work (and save) and use money saved to get back. So basically scrimping through!

Cheers all,

B

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - You may well end up working for buttons in Eastern Europe B.}

06 Jun 2014 12:29:53
That was my worry Ed002. I was thinking if I do go for it to try to set up a job - perhaps teaching English before I leave. Apparently there's a decent demand for teacher out there. But as the above post says; ill hopefully budget well and keep a kitty behind in case I need to fly home.

Cheers,

B

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - I suspect the opportunities for an 18 or 19 year old to teach English when he or she does not speak the local language would be pretty much zip. Sorry.}

Again, another worry that I've had Ed.

There are courses you can do back in the UK and organise a job before you move over there; how hard it is to get a job I don't know.

The affordability of such a trip is my biggest worry.

Cheers

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - If you are going on your own it won't be easy. My then girlfriend and I spent the lost summer of 1974 in the Hollywood Hills with Father Yod and the Source Family. There must be some similar experimental lifestyle communities around Europe - you may be able to spend some time on one of those in exchange for working the land or whatever. Would be a good life time experience. Do some research.}

I'm hopeful of dragging a friend along possibly if I do go. I also have some connections over in Romania - so if I do go there I should be able to get a bit of help settling in for the first couple of weeks. There are schemes like that - but they tend to be quite expensive to enrol on and quite restrictive.
I'll do some more research and see if any more Reds can suggest anything on here.

Cheers Ed,

B

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 14:29:45
Sounds like you need to read On The Road or The Dharma Bums and come up with some ideas.

Unfortunately mate, the ''experimental lifestyle communities'' Ed002 mentions - transcendental cultures/ finding yourself and making yourself psychologically whole, has all but disappeared.

This is largely down to the inflated cost of living and increased animosity towards what is perceived as one being a ''dole dosser'' - therefore the jobs which would allow you to fulfil your wanderlust have all but gone. Unless you have a ''rich other''/ inheritance who is willing to front you to do so.

I have looked into all possibilities and my major dream is to travel both caosts of the U.S.

As a writer, I think it would be fantastic experience and invaluable means of accumulating knowledge.

Instead, I decided to ''work'' through a Masters and I feel I have gained/satisfied some of this need. In turn, hopefully this will provide opportunities down the line.

If you have no desire for further education (understandably), then I suggest you work for six months in the U.K and then travel for six months wherever you please. Try and pick jobs up along the way and there are always hostels and people to meet along the way. But it will take careful research/ thought into where you want to go.

Cheers

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - The Farm which was created by Stephen Gaskin in the early 70s is still down in Tennessee. Certainly in Oregon, Washington State and the desert states there are still communities. I recall the peyote lodge in Silver City, not to far from Virginia City, in the late 70s.

Gaskin, a real ambassador for the 'beat' way of life. I didn't realise that 'The Farm' was still in operation!

Did you visit Silver City ED? I'm jealous of your heritage/experiences.

Thanks for sharing and I will certainly have a look at the communities you have referenced - I would like to take a trip there one day.

Townes Van Zandt is probably my all time favourite musician - I'm guessing you know of him?

Cheers!

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - I visited Silver City in the late 70s with my "mentor" and would periodically visit in later years - maybe once every five years. I had an old buddy called Chan Laughlin (better known as Travus T Hipp) who had a great radio show up there on KPIG for the last 10 or 12 years I guess. Chan has stepped outside now sadly. I have a buddy in England who wrote a song about Townes Van Zandt's Jacket (Pete O'Brien). I guess you should be able to find it on the internet somewhere.}

Haha that's awesome (TVZ jacket I mean) - I will 100% google that in hope that it's on Youtube or something!

As the kids say ED 'I'm weljel'.

Cheers for all the info mate (it seems your life expands way beyond the realms of the footballing echelons)!

Cheers.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - This should help: http://tinyurl.com/mrrm7ho}

06 Jun 2014 07:15:09
Ed002, do you happen to know whether Moreno would be open to a move to us? Thanks.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Yes he is happy with it.}

06 Jun 2014 07:06:49
Does anyone know if Can is seen as an alternative signing to Lallana for an attacking midfielder? Or is he going to be used as more of a central midfielder?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 09:02:46
Not an alternative, Can is suited to a deeper midfield role than Lallana.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 06:09:38
Back in November 2013, Big Sami Hyypia did an interview talking about our new signing. Which I thought was interesting enough to share on here, in case anyone else hasn't read it.

''He [Can] has everything needed to play in many positions, and he is well on the way to becoming a very good player.

He is incredible with the ball; has great technique, and he is strong in one-on-one situations. He plays better offensively, but he can defend well, and that aspect of his game should not be underestimated.''

''He still has much to learn, though. He needs more patience when making decisions, but he's smart enough to learn that.'' ~ Sami Hyypia on Emre Can.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 10:14:26
Sound like a perfect fit for Liverpool and Rodgers. Experienced enough to make a contribution but young enough and willing enough to learn and fulfil potential. I think this will be a blueprint for many Rodgers signings.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 05:41:29
Eds, do Markovic instead of Lallana rumours have any legs or is it just another name?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - UTSF.}

06 Jun 2014 03:42:25
Hi ed
Any news regarding shaqiri.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Nothing happened overnight with Shaqiri.}

06 Jun 2014 03:35:06
Just watched a 10 minute video on the LFC YouTube Chanel on Sakho. For whatever it's worth I highly recommend checking it out. It really gives you an inside look at who he is and what he's all about. after watching I can really say I am thrilled to have him on our team. Very humble guy, extremely appreciative of where he is, great work ethic, and a hell of a player who is only going to get better. Really understands what Liverpool is all about and is genuinely proud to represent us. Hopefully he continues to improve and is a no brainer first choice center half for the next 10 years. can't wait for the coming season already!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 03:21:59
Hey Everyone,

So Just got some of the best news of my life that I will be interning in London in three months (from US) and now have a couple questions I thought I would ask here.

1) Being in London does anyone have a recommendations for a place to watch Liverpool games next season/anything that I should defiantly make sure I don while i'm there?

2) When can I start trying to get tickets to a game at Anfield and is the best source the Liverpool website if I am a member?

Thanks

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Jun 2014 06:40:53
Congratulations on the internship.

1. There will be many places to see in London if you are into that kind of thing.

2. Yes, register with the site and I think that the best.

Agree0 Disagree0

You can ring the ticket-office directly.
My advice is to leave it as late as possible for returns (unwanted seats).
You pay over the phone and collect the ticket from the ticket-office just before the game. Good luck.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Jun 2014 23:52:37
Hi Eds, again I want to echo the gratitude that most people show towards you on here. Unbelievable dedication and knowledge you kindly give to us all.

I was reading on the Liverpool echo website an article they wrote about emre can and the fact the deal was feared to be stalling last weekend. a lot of sites were saying it was a disagreement over wages which the echo claim was incorrect, it was more a matter of certain clauses being in the contract and once a compromise was reached the deal went ahead.

Would you have any idea what the clauses in question were?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - The clause from BM was "purchased".}

I presume we had to pay for it Ed? don't want to bring up the price or anything, just wondering who was responsible for paying Munich

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - It is irrelevant.}

06 Jun 2014 09:18:53
Think Bayern got 10% of the fee, €1.2m.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - No, please just drop it.}

06 Jun 2014 09:38:42
Chan do ;)

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Jun 2014 23:44:43
Ed, if yous don't mind,, one off.
Any london people here?
My daughters looking to go to uni in london September, though i'd rather she stayed here.in northern ireland!
Just looking at accomodation for her and it.looks appallingly exspensive' anyone know spots where she could afford it or even any eds from london?thanks

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I have a daughter who lives in Primrose Hill - I will ask her for any ideas. Try the college web sites and they will have accommodation folk. When I moved here to do a Masters in 81 it was very different and we lived in Chelsea - very different now and I appreciate tough. Remind me tomorrow afternoon.}

I suppose you could try the South, if Queens or Coleraine isn't an option, I wouldn't know much, but I've known a few people to go to Wales and Scotland.

Agree0 Disagree0

It's very expensive in London mate you won't get anywhere here cheap.

Agree0 Disagree0

I was also a student in the 1980s (at King's) and though it was very different, my advice would be for her to live in a uni hall of residence for her first year. She and friends will then be able to look to share a flat; some will be advertised only in the uni's accommodation office. That should bring the price down a bit, as, in general, will living further away from the centre. Financially it's extremely tough, but it's still a fantastic place to be a student. Good luck with it.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 07:20:44
Ed002, thanks a.million mate!
I highly.doubt my daughter will live in primerose hill unless I win the lotto, I will tomorrow, thanks mate

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Yes, Primrose Hill is really pricey but she is fortunate and can afford to live where she wants. I left a voicemail for her last night about this, but I am not sure if she is in England right now.}

I live in London, it is all prety expensive compared to the rest of the country. If you know which uni she is looking at going to I will suggest some areas.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Jun 2014 06:38:11
I think you need to take into account the travel costs and time it takes to travel too; especially if you live a long way away from the University. Depending on where you live, it will likely cost around 90 quid for travel a month if you use the tube.

When I was working in London, I stayed about 30 minutes from the company I used to work for, in West London, walked to work everyday and saved an estimated 1000 pounds a year (which was a lot to me).

Accommodation will be expensive pretty much everywhere but I would suggest to live closer to the University if possible; you don't want your daughter to compromise on education. When I went to University in Newcastle, I could get a double room for 180 pounds/m but in London, a box room would cost 500 pounds/m.

Good luck to your daughter.

Agree0 Disagree0

Everything lemonhead said - I'm currently studying at city but have to travel from Kingston daily cause I couldn't afford living more centrally, although to be fair when you add up the travel expenses it's not cheap either

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - I know of the Oyster card, but do students get a break on travel in London?}

My daughter is also starting at uni in September. she'll be based at St.Georges Tooting but will do stuff at Kings aswell. She's looking at a place in upmarket Fulham which is secure and all-inclusive of bills for £150 p.w.
I think it is a halls of residence mainly occupied by Kings College students.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Maybe a group of them can get together and rent somewhere? Part of the problem is that they won't be in any hip designer area (which is seemingly most of London (except the South East).}

06 Jun 2014 09:32:38
Yes, students get a discount I believe, but is is a different sort of Oyster Card, with your picture and everything. I remember my ex- girlfriend constantly using this; always topping up with my money.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - I had the same problem with your girlfriend.}

Thanks for all the replys gentlemen!
My daughters.going to london on her own, all of her friends are staying here.i.believe'
She will be.looking through extras so she.could end up in any.university in london. She might have to get a job whilst juggling uni taking into account travel costs and.food'
Thanks edd002, whenever you get time mate!

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - She hasn't called yet but both girls did bar work whilst at college - I wasn't living in England for most of the time they were at university. I'll let you know what she says.}

06 Jun 2014 10:31:23
So you are the fat old person my ex is going out with now?

She doesn't think you are particularity good in bed Ed002; she implied she wanted discreet services from me without your knowledge.

I am happy she has found her women

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Sure sounds like me. Why not buy the DVD and see for yourself?}

Big Al, based on this--'She will be.looking through extras so she.could end up in any.university in london'--I would think carefully about what you're planning to do. It sounds like your daughter hasn't actually applied anywhere yet. That means she will have to go through clearing. Most worthwhile undergraduate courses at London universities will already be fully subscribed. Unless she has three straight As at A-Level (in which case universities are free to accept her onto otherwise fully subscribed courses, without prior application—if they want to), it looks like she intends to choose among any remaining courses that will take her.

This is a really bad idea. For almost all courses the fees will be £9k per year. Is she really happy to study something she’s not really interested in, and pay £27k plus living costs (I can’t see any way these will be anything under £600 per month, no matter how many people she shares with) for the privilege? You’re looking at debt of close to £50k at the end of a three-year course, minus any money she’s been able to earn—which won’t be a lot, if she’s planning to spend any time studying.

It would be much better to take 2014-15 as a gap year, spend some or all of it in London, earning some money via bar work etc to pay as much of the cost of living as she can, and meanwhile think through her options carefully. Then she can apply for a course she seriously wants to do—having taken into consideration whether it’s worth the money.

Sorry if I’ve misunderstood something and you know all this, but I’d hate to see you making a mistake that could burden you or your daughter with massive debt for decades. Best of luck whatever she decides to do.

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent