Liverpool Banter Archive September 05 2013

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

05 Sep 2013 22:51:42
I agree with you Lifelongred but the reality is he may sit on the bench for a few games but eventually he will be back in the first 11 because he's the best attacking player we have.

Benny it's going to be an interesting few months, especially if we keep winning because at the minute all 3 midfield players are undropable in my opinion. Just because of the energy and balance they bring to the team. But then On the flip side Moses and Aspas have strong claims to be in the first 11.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Don't talk soft.
The 2nd half of the Utd match showed why Suarez will, and should, walk straight back in to the side.
There was no outball. Aspas, for all his good running, is too lightweight.
He needs about a stone and a half of muscle on him.
The ball was coming right back and we got pinned back.
You could have Coutinho, Suarez, Sturridge as front three. Or Moses, Suarez, Sturridge with Coutinho dropping into central midefield depending on the opposition.
But Suarez, providing he's fit and able, will go back in to the team.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 23:49:29
Don't be ignorant, when we played the Mancs with Suarez Twice last season, we did loose both times and he didn't do jack! Gerrard & Sturridge scored the goals.
Suarez should earn his starting place after this summer's shambles!

Agree0 Disagree0

Spot on juicer, most united fans kept saying we were there for the taking, but to me the game went according to plan score early and play on the break we just couldn't do that.if we had suarez we could have scored 3goals
No offense sturridge isn't anywhere close to suarez quality we need him asap.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sorry that post was meant to carry on from thread below.

I'm not being 'soft'! The reality is since Suarez hasn't been in the side we haven't lost and to top that off he's acted like a complete cnut all summer. So yeah I don't think he should just wander back in the side.

We'll see how it pans out but it shows how far we've come in the last 12months because 12 months ago Suarez and Gerrard were the only two players we had and thoughts of dropping them would have put you in the 'insane' category!

Agree0 Disagree0

Don't be soft the juicer
Did we not have our highest scoring games without him last season?
So far we have beat Man U, beat Aston villa who thrashed arsenal and should have beat Chelsea if not for a dodgy ref, we also beat stoke who last year with Suarez we couldn't do.
Suarez is a class player and I've no doubt he will play and score goals, but when he plays we do become one dimensional, he needs start passing more and stop wasting all the shots.
You say Sturidge isn't as good, the lad ran his socks off, scored our goal and defended really well against Man U, all while injured.
Give aspas a chance he only been here for 3 games

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Sep 2013 08:35:30
In my honest opinion, Sturridge is twice the player Suarex is. He is much faster, much better finishing and dribbling skills. SUAREZ can go do one for all I care. I support Liverpool and NOT SUAREX, specially when we are doing much better without him, there is absolutely no logic that we would have done better in any of our games with him. I really hope BR has the cahonas to bench the DF.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sturridge is the best goal scorer we have and suarez is the best player we have. I wouldn't swap them two for anyone in the league.

Agree0 Disagree0

Suarez is an insanely good player but not a team player. He can produce a bit of magic and win games on his own but when he doesn't do that he ends up a bit of a liability - he doesn't pass enough, tries shots from anywhere, etc. An unselfish Suarez would be the best player we have

Agree0 Disagree0

Lifelongred,
I suggested that it would be Aspas who would make way for Suarez, not Sturridge.

Agree0 Disagree0

I don't know where you get this Suarez is not a team player from.
For the large part of his Liverpool career he's been upfront either on his own, or with no support, so of course he's had to fashion out a lot of his own chances.
But the matches I've seen (barring Southampton away), he's come off the pitch barely able to walk, he was so knackered.

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm not saying he doesn't put a shift in, Juicer, he certainly does. I just meant he's quick to go for glory when a pass would have been better, or try to dribble when there are men free. But, to be fair, he had also been part of a number of glorious team goals last season it's just that occasionally his decision making favours Suarez rather than the team (on and off the pitch)

Agree0 Disagree0

The juicer
My mistake about aspas
I'd still rather give him a chance, Suarez gives all for the team, no denying that, but he is also a liability when his bits of magic fail, we as a team are one dimensional, many times last season he'd take on players or take on a shot as he thought He was the best option when clearly he wasn't, this wasted a lot of chances for us last season, chances that if passed on to better placed players could have turned drawn games into wins. With him doing this it seems like when he has the chances he doesn't think the rest of the team are good enough for him to trust to finish the move so he keeps it himself, plus the fact he has acted like he thinks he is bigger than LFC and all of the other players proves he is not a team player.

Agree0 Disagree0

As good as everyone makes Suarez out to be, he definitely can still improve. His finishing and getting his head up to make a pass. If he had an extra yard of pace I would put in the top 5 in the world category.

Agree0 Disagree0

Suarez is the BEST at what Suarez does. Every team needs a player like that who can turn games w/ one dribble, shake or swerve. And BTW, He is darn right deadly from dead-ball situations.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 21:46:15
Evening reds,

I'm intrigued by everyone's opinion on the Victor Moses signing as every fan's, whom I have spoken to anyway, thoughts seem poles away from the previous.

I think he, like DS, could prove to be a very shrewd signing by the club and cannot understand the negativity. I can't help but thinking that his signing was just to replenish the squad should we miss out on the top winger we was after, but nevertheless he's still a class player imo.

We have enough going forward but I would almost certainly expect movement in January, possibly Yarmolenko mould player, it's too early to tell however I for am very hopeful and trust BR to deliver what is expected this year!

Ynwa

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Im quite happy with the player, moses, i'm not happy with the transfer though. There is no deal to buy at the end of the loan for a set price. So, if he has a blinder, they'll over charge us. So we won't keep him, and then he has taken up space and time someone on our actual books could be getting.

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm open to correction on this but I seem to recall us being linked with Moses before he signed for Chelsea? At the time I thought he was a good player for Wigan with plenty of potential (still only 22 now). Judging by his comments he seemed to actually want to go out on loan now to protect his career so hopefully he will be highly motivated. Unfortunately I can't see Chelsea selling him to us on a permanent basis if he does well. They must be very nervous of doing deals with us after Torres & Sturridge.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 23:44:28
The only time I have seen Moses play was in the African cup of nations, and to be fair he was absolutely brilliant, but it was against weaker African teams, to give you an example Mikel was among their best players.
So I will not judge until he plays 5-6 games!
And Chelsea will probably not stand in his way if they don't need him.

Agree0 Disagree0

Personally I like moses
not world class but a good player with plenty of time to improve
I think he will do well with us although not prolific he does score goals and has BPL experience and mentality so yeh good signing IMO

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Sep 2013 00:57:03
Moses is here to take Borini's spot whilst the kid gets some game time under Di Canio, as repeated by both ed01 and Ed02. There doesn't need to be a buy clause, partially for that reason. Also, ed02 has stated in the past that if a player wants to leave Chelsea, the club will rarely stand in his way. I therefore doubt that, even if Moses is incredible, there would be too much difficulty in making the move permanent.

Agree0 Disagree0

Always liked him as a player, scored one in four last season for Chelsea, a lot of that from the bench, was a bit worried at first about him taking the game time from sterling and ibe, but I think he will do us a good job on the left allowing coutinho through the middle.
Plus gives us more options up front, aspas, ibe, sterling, Moses, sturridge and Suarez all able to play across the front 3, pace touch and finishing to spare.

Agree0 Disagree0

Moses is very talented but still raw. As for Mikel being one of the best players at AFCON, allow me to inform you that when Mikel plays for Nigeria, he plays the no.10 role, his REAL position, the one he`s been playing since he was with the U-17`s of Nigeria. When he plays for Nigeria, he is quite a different player from the lumbering and sometimes, lethargic one we see in the EPL. and BTW at the AFCON, he COMPLETELY outplayed Yaya Toure when they beat the Ivory Coast in the quarters.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 20:59:02
Ed002, how highly rated is Rodrigo from Benfica? And who holds an interest in him? Would love a reply. Cheers. {Ed002's Note - Atletico Madrid have shown an interest in Rodrigo since the winter, but for now anything else is speculation. Juventus dropped what interest they had.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Sep 2013 20:01:22
Following on from Benny Ballers question about who will be dropped when Suarez comes back. Is it out of the question for Gerrard to be dropped? Henderson has been playing well and brings so much energy to the field. And dropping Aspas still doesn't solve the problem of getting Coutiniho into the middle.
I don't know for sure but I suspect we would be a bit more fluid going forward as a result.
What's everyone's thoughts?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Suarez will have to earn his place back in the team, I may be wrong but have we lost a game since he has not played due to being a DF?
We playing like a team, fighting for every point, no doubt he an awesome player but I hope he has to fight his way back in

Agree0 Disagree0

Hmm, you raise a good point, I did bring it up around 7 to 8 months ago that gerrard needed to be dropped, obviously I was shot down with abuse. He then turned his game up and had a good second half of the season. Lucas is a must for me, loves a tackle, makes extremely positive forward passes and is good on the ball. Should Stevie sit out a few for hendo? hmmm ahhhh, its a tough one. SG is misplacing a few passes ATM and hendo is firing. I believe in time, definitely, right now, SG must be ahead of JH, simply because he offers a calmness to the other players, and can be looked to as a role model, and can always do something special. so soon i'd say to hendo. just hope if hendo Is dropped for suarez, his head doesn't drop and he tries even harder!

Agree0 Disagree0

Passing accuracy top 5 (Opta):

1 Kolo Toure 87.70%
2 Lucas Leiva 86.70%
3 Steven Gerrard 86.50%
4 Jordan Henderson 84.80%
5 Raheem Sterling 84.60%

Don't think SG is too shabby

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 22:25:53
Within reason, I would consider it out of the question. I can't imagine Gerrard's form falling far enough behind the players around him that he'd be the one to lose out. After Lucas, I'd consider Gerrard the least likely of our midfielders and attackers to be dropped.

Most likely, I think Suarez will replace Aspas, even if that won't put Coutinho in the middle.

Agree0 Disagree0

If the team is continuing to play well then luis will have to wait hopefully, he too good to keep out long term and for me he will take aspas's place. You don't drop Stevie unless he playing absolute shed, and he doesn't do that

Agree0 Disagree0

Its a good point but why would BR drop a midfielder to accommodate a forward? We won't play with a two man midfield and it would be difficult for Coutinho to put him in there. Personally I think it will be Aspas who will make way, maybe not straight away but I reckon Suarez will give 110% once he is on that pitch and we can't afford to have him sitting on the bench. Yes we have made a great start but we won each match by the narrowest of margins and maybe if Suarez had been on the pitch we might have killed off those games way before full time.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 23:24:56
Or maybe drawn or even lost due to how selfish he is?All speculation am afraid, the fact is though LFC win % is almost double without Suarez in the team, we will see when he comes back!

Agree0 Disagree0

Just looking at Gerrards passing stats. The thing about Gerrard again he will look for a forward pass and more long range passes as well which of course have more of a chance of going astray. So his stats are very good for me. Also, you can't be the leader that Gerrard is from the bench. As long as he is fit and healthy Gerrard stays in.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 19:06:23
Seeing as my topics of brendans new contract, and should sakho replace agger, went down so well. I bring another topic to be discussed.
Are people aware we actually don't select a CAM? LL SG JH play pretty much a straight line. in a 433. this leaves 2 wingers and a striker. JH occasionally goes forward into that whole, but normally its coutinho tucking in from wide. both wingers infact tend to tuck in, leaving SG to back up LB and JH to back up RB whilst LL bosses the middle.

my debate is, do we bring suarez in for either aspas, and carry on with DS as CF and PC+LS played as tucked in wingers. Or do we do we drop one of LL SG JH, to play LS in an advanced position, behind DS, and keep the 2 wingers in CP and IA.
Discuss! x

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Easy bring in Suarez for Aspas until the former loses his head and earns another ban and then put Aspas back in

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm no tactical genius, but I would disagree with most of what you say about the way the team is set up. I also think that BR would as well, or why else would he describe Coutinho as an ideal no 10. It seems to me that he plays with either 2 deeper lying midfielders - normally Gerrard and Lucas, and Henderson more advanced, but essentially allowing Gerrard to play further forwards at times, with just Lucas as the DM. I can't really ever remember the 3 midfielders playing in a line across the pitch tbh.

Agree0 Disagree0

Jordan Henderson started against United on the right wing.

Agree0 Disagree0

Forgetting tactics and which positions they occupy, as its almost irrelevant because of the movement anyway. But if you drop Henderson your dropping the most inform player which doesn't seem right to me. I think it has to be Aspas dropped which is a shame too because he's looked full of beans!

Agree0 Disagree0

Rodgers divides the pitch into zones that don't necessarily correspond with fixed assumptions about 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1. In my view, with the players he has recruited, we may well see something like this.

Mignolet in goal
Toure, Agger & Sakho as a back three with Agger as the spare man.
The full backs pushed well forward
Lucas as DM with Gerrard slightly more advanced. Suarez & Coutinho operating behind Sturridge but with the freedom to roam and defensive responsibilities restricted to dropping into midfield and pressing defenders. If in need of goals the full backs can be replaced with wide attackers. A CB can drop out and revert to 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1. Without the ball defending a lead we have played 4-4-1-1 in large parts of last 2 games. Rodgers has shown he is flexible and pragmatic.

Agree0 Disagree0

Nick you're wrong. Ollie you're right. however due to being penned back, Henderson was in line with steve and lucas. Nick, its the basics of the 433 we are playing. because the 2 wingers cut in so much, and stay high. the players either side of the cdm, must cover full backs. i'm guessing you haven't watched a game this season? not only do the front 3 swap about, but the middle 3 do too, hendo is normally the one making movements forward, but gerrard does a few a game too.

Agree0 Disagree0

Henderson is given the freedom to play further up the pitch and Aspas and Countinho are not wingers. Gerrard and Lucas play deeper and protect the back 4.

Agree0 Disagree0

Midfield 3 of Gerrard Lucas and Couthino with Lucas sitting, Gerrard going wherever he likes and Coutinho advanced behind a front three of Suarez, Sturridge and Moses.

Agree0 Disagree0

Does no one else think Suarez should get a skelf in his arse sitting on the bench - until he learns some manners?

Besides, what happened to the old adage about not changing a winning team?

Personally, I'd stick with the current 11 and then give Sterling, Ibe, Alberto and Moses all a shot up front before I'd consider Suarez again.

He is not indispensable. He is not bigger than the club. He can get 5/10 minutes here and there until Brendan decides otherwise.

Thanks, Hx.

Agree0 Disagree0

Chris in tamworth, you've hit the nail on the head.
I too believe couts will be classed as one of the midfielders.
SG LL
PC
then your front three.

Agree0 Disagree0

There are a few sites out there that show average player position on the pitch that are probably worth a look.

Generically speaking, in the first three games, we've had Aspas slightly behind Sturridge, Henderson generally wider right, Coutinho a tad behind and just to the left of Sturridge/Aspas.

Enrique tends to be more or less by himself in sort of the mid-left position, Johnson is pushed by pretty high right behind Henderson, and Agger/Skrtel/Toure/Gerrard/Lucas are probably about where you would expect them to be.

The other interesting aspect is that versus Stoke, on average we had 6 players in their side of the pitch, versus Villa only 4, and versus United only 3. Hoping to see that trend change against Swansea.

Agree0 Disagree0

Without getting arsey Benny, you're wrong. Irish Rover is right. And we also don't play with wingers.

Agree0 Disagree0

How am I wrong nick?
" because the 2 wingers cut in so much, and stay high"
I use the term winger, because what else would you label them? RAM LAM? AKA winger

Agree0 Disagree0

I think the fact no one can agree is part of why our team is starting to play well and turn our games into higher points.
Our formation starts as a 4 3 3, but our team is so fluid on the pitch, wheyou watch the game you can see Lucas sits back rarely going too far forward, Gerard and Henderson are more flexible dropping back to help out and going forward for options, our front three interchange constantly from wings drifting inside, sturridge drifts out wide all our players give each other options going forward,
When defending our formation drops back to 433, and against stiffer opponents Henderson seems to play wide right to help cover when Johnson goes forward.
So I wouldn't worry so much about our formation, we have a very quick and fluid attack giving us options all over with players that can adapt to more than one position.

Agree0 Disagree0

It is true what Chris is saying is where Rodgers wants to play Cout but it is also a bit risky against better teams especially if we are under pressure like we were last Sunday. If we are chasing a game then Cout is the man for me but if you are looking for for workrate and industry then I would nail my hat on Hendo but isn't it nice to have the dilema? So much better than the first 11 picking itself in myopinion. Cheers

Agree0 Disagree0

Anyone else think aspas might keep moses out from the team?

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Sep 2013 09:42:30
Well from the games we have played so far, Aspas has played the nr. 10 role, coutinho has played as a false left winger who cuts inside and Henderson has been playing as a defensive wide midfielder. Gerrard is protecting the back 4 with Lucas. So on paper we have been playing 4-2-3-1 but I think Aspas will sit on the bench for Suarez.

Suarez, Coutinho, Henderson with Sturridge upfront.
Moses, Alberto, Sterling with Aspas upfront as their Backup/ Rotation options.

Agree0 Disagree0

I think the above comments show that we don't actually play with any set formation! We have a list of names spread out in a 433 shown to us by pundits. However BR has said it time and again, LFC are aiming to be fluid in their play.I think the team is spplit into defense and attack. The players in the team have an area of responsibilty however throughout the play you may see for instance Coutinho in a traditional wingers role, then 10 minutes later he is in central midfield. 10 minutes after that he is in a traditional number 10 role up behing Sturridge. BR's philosophy seems to be having technically gifted players who will play a number of positions in every game. Using this philosophy means it is nearly impossible to tag the team with a traditional formation like 442 or 433. I think Kidder has pretty much nailed it above!

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 18:52:15
Ed001/Ed002 just wondering if you could clear something up for me? Sydney on the united page has hinted that there are certain clauses written into the contracts of sturridge and coutinho! He never stated what they were, just that there were clauses! How would he have this information if there are and is that the case?

Ian the red {Ed002's Note - No idea what he is referring to - you would need to ask him. He doesn't bite.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Sydney as been beating his keyboard up since Sunday. I wouldn't worry to much.

Agree0 Disagree0

He will make up any old story. He was probably referring to Santa Clause.

Agree0 Disagree0

Clauses? In a contract?

Weird!

I would ignore Sydney, he's not the player's agent and he doesn't work for LFC so he doesn't know squat about contract details.

Agree0 Disagree0

If jordan henderson plays at this level for another 5-6 months then he ll also have 'clause' in his contract

Agree0 Disagree0

Ian don't worry syddie has no idea what is in their contracts he is just trying to wind you up.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sydney's hate for Liverpool is greater than his love for Manchester United, he'll say anything to get under our skin, just like when he predicted Agger, Skrtel and Suarez would all 100% leave this summer.

Vidic, Ferdinand, Giggs, RVP, Evra and Carrick are all getting to the latter stages of their careers then they junk like Cleverley, Zaha, Valencia and Anderson who shouldn't even be at United and he's trying to take his mind of the troubles United are facing and rightly so with Moyes, Woodward and the Glazers at the helm.

Agree0 Disagree0

United?. Aren't they the team that were trespassing on our perch for a short while?

Agree0 Disagree0

To be fair to sydney he does know what he's talking about when it comes to football he has a good knowledge of the game but he loves to wind lfc fans up like his aspas was saurez replacement theory look how that turned out but as he's got you asking the eds he's suceeded in pulling your leg clauses in boths contracts neither were world class stars when we bought them so not in no position to be putting clauses in they weren't the highest in demand players when we signed them next contracts they sign may have a clause in like saurez first contract had no clauses in his second on just not what he thought he had lol

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Sep 2013 09:16:56
23 years ain't exactly a short while :/ my baby brother is now a man with more facial hair than me with a son, 2 generations since Our perch.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Sep 2013 10:44:36
I can guarantee you he is talking BS. There are nothing in their contracts to do with any transfer business apart from the usual.

How did Suarez's clauses work out for him Btw syd?
He used to call him self Disney

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 18:32:11
Does anyone think that we have loaned players out so that they can be sold later on when we need the extra cash to make purchases under FFP rules? Thoughts? {Ed002's Note - The approach taken by another club is to buy players now, and send them out on loan so they do not need to buy later. That is far more likely.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

The loans are all different. Reina is to replace with younger guy, get wages off LFC and ensure higher value for sale next summer. I believe Coates would have been loaned to get his value up (it's plummeted) and Assaidi is similar ( he does well in Prem we can sell him to a Prem club that will pay decent fee and match wages unlike Dutch & Belgian clubs). Borini, Suso, Robinson & Wisdom (January) are loans to develop plyers we would hope have big futures at the club. Others like Ngoo, Adorjan etc are to put in shop window and attract low fees that can be effectively reinvested in the Academy. Very few players in most Academy's are ever good enough for the first XI at a top PL side.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Sep 2013 08:55:16
You're right Kidder, but I feel we are putting Borini in the shop window though. F.eks, we wanted no money or wages covered for Suso's loan. We only wanted guarantees over his playing time. Borini, well we demanded £1, 5 million loan fee. And Sunderland pay his whole wages and on top of that they do have Fletcher & Altidore. So hopefully he pushes them out of the team.
Assaidi's loan is actually very good for us. If you watch his highlights he is easily a £ 10 million player. If we sold him this summer we would have got 2-3 million � tops.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 18:02:53
Hi edds, what age does a player have to be for him to be allowed go out on loan? and could you see sterling or ibe going out on loan anytime soon? {Ed002's Note - He needs to be 18. I don't know if the club would consider it right now.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Personally I wouldn't let either go out on loan now. Rodgers has options in his front line, whether he wants natural wingers to create for the striker, or he wants strikers to play in an attacking front three.

I think Ibe is almost a carbon copy of Alex Oxlade Chamberlain, powerful direct running with the ability to shoot and link up in an intricate passing movement. Ibe for me needs game time and I think Rodgers is happy to give him that, he also likes to cut in and take a chance or roll it to someone in a better position, Rodgers again seems to desire that from his wide playing forwards.

Sterling is more delicate, although he's deceptively strong at times. I think Sterling also needs game time at this crucial age and I think last season was a great learning curb for him being played out of position. I think Sterling has done very well so far this season but I do think it's in a way, unfair or unjust too play both Ibe and Sterling at the same time, as their hold up play at times is still lacking and as we saw against Notts County was very nearly costly for us.

I'd like to think that when Suarez comes back, he'll play on the left or right of Sturridge in the centre and we'll either use Moses or Aspas against the stronger teams but will interchange Ibe and Sterling against some of the lesser teams. Obviously form comes into the reasoning as well as injuries, knocks and general fitness, throughout and even suspensions.

I think we'll be glad we didn't let either of them go on loan, Borini needed the loan move and thankfully he got it, albeit for a comical and crazy Di Canio side, hopefully he does well and we get a real goal threat back next season. He's got everything and proved it in Italy, great desire, work ethic, decent lad and has the ability, just needs the consistent games, injury free and for his natural game to come through. Just my opinion.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 17:09:29
Eds and reds,

Liverpool are lining up a move for free agent goalkeeper Antonio Adan. The Spaniard rescinded his contract with Real Madrid on transfer deadline day, and is currently on the lookout for a new club.
Rodgers has long admired the 26-year-old, and could now swoop in with a contract offer.

Any truth in this? {Ed002's Note - I don't know but I would expect him to look for a club where he would play.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

So Ed002, you are saying he should try to engineer a move to Arsenal?

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 16:57:05
Hi eds any truth that we are trying to Bring in a keeper as a free agent? I seen Adan from Madrid mentioned. {Ed002's Note - I don't know but I would expect him to look for a club where he would play.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Sep 2013 16:09:22
Sturridge confirmed out of Moldova game. Will be reassessed before Ukrane match. Good to see England not pushing him into a long term injury by overplaying him. The Notts County game is still haunting us - next time no taking the foot off the pedal, we need to kill these matches off.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Sep 2013 16:09:22
Damien Comolli has said he believes Man U could use a director of football to help with transfers. Hope he gets the job. Haha.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Holy Comolloi is shamelessly looking for a job. He knows how to waste a few million quid!

Agree0 Disagree0

I hope they take Comolli, lol.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Sep 2013 10:04:05
Comolli will never get a job at a top English club ever again. He did when sacked from Spurs because he did bring some real good players there. But his last dealing at Liverpool before he got the chop again was farsical and comical.

Apart from Suarez & Henderson all the players brought by him were flops, and hugely overpriced.

Carroll, Downing, Adam, Coates for £ 70 million in transfer fees alone.
Sold for around £ 28 million.( coates would fetch 3 million)

Sturridge, Aspas, Coutinho, Sakho for £ 45 million.

Sturridge Alone would get what all those 4 would sell/sold for.

I think Ian Ayre gets to much undeserved stick.

Agree0 Disagree0

Coates would get £6m

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 15:24:42
Liverpool has conceded just 3 goals in last 10 league matches 2 against Chelsea in 2-2 draw and 1-3 win against Fulham.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

We dumped United's away record out of the window as well. :)

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 15:16:11
Hi Eds,
I was wondering if you would mind giving a percentage figure to how much healthier the wage bill is now that the transfer window is shut?

Thanks in advance. {Ed002's Note - We really don't want to be discussing wages Nick.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Okay, cheers Ed, I thought I'd give it a whirl just in case lol.

Agree0 Disagree0

Carroll, Carragher, Reina, Downing, Cole were all BIG earners. Shelvey, Spearing, Assaidi, Wilson, Pacheco earned more than you might have thought. Sturridge, Coutinho, Toure & Sakho will be BIG earners with Mignolet and other new signings on less than the players they replaced. Coates injury & Skrtel staying probably haven't reduced the wage bill by as much as perhaps anticipated. Moses & Cissokho on quite large wages partly balanced by Borini going on loan. I'd guestimate annual wage savings on the summer deals to be c3-5m. Could have been 10m. This doesn't take into account pay-offs - just going off info on rough salaries from a former player.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 15:09:13
Just want to wish every Liverpool luck on the international stage I just hope there are no injuries

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Sep 2013 10:11:32
Hi eds thanx again for all your hard work just wondering now Suarez wants a clause in his contract. Has he signed another contract yet and if so do you know how much the release clause is supposed to be. {Ed002's Note - I really have no idea about his contract.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Sep 2013 11:27:06
Great article on ssn about jon Flanagan by Johnny Phillips. You guys need to check it ou

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Just read it took me a while to find it homgrown something the title but yes a good read I hope he breaks into the firsr team eventually as the article says after stevie goeswe will have no Liverpool lads Iin the first team here's hoping a few can break through and be first team regulars

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 10:53:35
Andre Wisdom named England u21 Captain - Congrats Andre well deserved :)

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Sep 2013 10:43:56
Moses given number 12, Sakho 17, and Ilori has 26.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Sep 2013 09:36:08
Any idea when the new spanish youth players will be able to play i'm not really sure if they are officially our players yet?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

As Ed002 said a while back, Canos and Chirivella are around 16 years of age and there is some issue regarding the age-limit of foreign players or something of that sort, hence why they haven't been 'announced' on the site. But they are 'officially' Liverpool players, hence why they are participating in tournaments with the Liverbird on their chests. Pardon any mistakes though, this is what I recall from memory.

Hope it helps!

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Sep 2013 19:50:52
Really impressed with sergi canos the lad will make the grade.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 09:31:56
LFC RELATED
The whole Moyes inquest is hysterical.
WHICH SELF RESPECTING SUPER STAR WANTS TO PLAY FOR MOYES?
This highlights a bit of the difference between Liverpool and Man Utd.
LIVERPOOL IS GREAT, where as Fergie was great, not Man Utd.
LFC had dynasties, Shanks, paisley, fagan, dalglish, even the minor successes of Benitez, houlier etc.
The greatness of out club was not due to one person, and that is what makes LFC timeless.
The Manchester United fanbase will deminish substantially as they couldn't distinguish whether they were Manchester United Supporters, or Fergie Supporters and now suddenly, they will soon discover that they were actually Fergie supporters all along and that they got to find themselves another team to support.
THIS IS WHAT SETS A LIVERPOOL FAN APART FROM A Manchester United FAN. Managers come and go but the greatness of the CLUB will always remain.
YNWA

Believable1 Unbelievable0

05 Sep 2013 10:17:59
Villa were ahead of us before we beat 'em :P

Agree0 Disagree0

You are unfortunately deluded. And I'm a lifelong Liverpool supporter. One of the reasons our rivalry has intensified in recent years is because we're both great clubs rich in history and success.
I can't stand united any more than any LFC fan but you sound bitter, one-eyed and ignorant if you seriously believe what you wrote, pirate

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 10:25:50
Morning pirate, your direction is both your posts shall we say is very blinkered and wrong regardless of its good intentions! You have contradicted yourself on a couple of points! In a possitive not we have started well! Which is important as when the north london clubs arsenal and spurs get into gear they could be hard to stop? Obviously along with city and chelsea as well! Its not a dig but I can possibly see united struggling this term? So its immportant we try to keep this run going? I've already heard the stupid 'were going to win the league' quotes lol

Agree0 Disagree0

Matt Busby? Bobby Charlton, George Best etc etc? They won the European Cup before us and were the most famous team on the planet. They happen to be the most famous team in the country, but we just happen to be the greatest :)

Agree0 Disagree0

Man Utd are a great club, always were always will be. Again this from a lifelong Lfc supporter. Also I would not write them or Moyes off yet, Fergie is a canny old fox, there is a reason he will have favoured Moyes as a successor.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 12:28:15
Pirate, teams like LFC and United are a rare breed nowadays. We embrace the local culture and have serious history in English football. We are the two most passionately supported teams in the country. You don't have to like them, but you do have to respect what they are; which is a great club. We have both always stuck to a british/local core to the team, and have always had inspirational managers. Most of our success actually came in the Shankly/Paisley era. They made the already great club into something truly legendary, just like Fergie did.

The only thing I do agree with you on, is how many 'supporters' they will lose. United fans are as fickle as they come, and I suspect at least 30-40% of their fan base are the modern day 'glory supporters'. The sad fact is, kids nowadays just support whoever is winning or has the best players, which for the last 20 years has been United. I agree with your sentiments, as we are a better club ;) but for different reasons to those you have given!

YNWAdam

Agree0 Disagree0

The reason why Fergie appointed Moyes as his successor is to make himself look even better. Just like the old Roman emperors (especially the ones with the biggest ego's, like old whisky nose!), they always made sure that their successor was a flake. As you say, he is a canny old fox, but a canny old megalomaniac fox. I am in no doubt that Utd will be playing for 4th this season. They will still be a good team, but they won't have that same ability to pull a win out of nowhere that they had before.

Agree0 Disagree0

Don't think united will be half the team without fergie, just think of how many times he won games an did nt even kick a ball .

Agree0 Disagree0

One very important point to note is that referees are not scared of Moyes, as they were with Ferguson. If one gave a bad decision against United, it would be a long time before they reffed Utd again and they were worried about their careers because of the influence he had with the powers-that-be.

That's why United usually got 50 - 50 decisions, as it was less hassle for the ref at the end of the game. They won so many games with this, just think back to the decisions they got when they beat us at Anfield last season.

Moyes will not get these decisions and, believe me, it will make a big difference.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 08:32:25
Was just glancing through the rumours page and someone mentioned Blair Mayne and I came over all nostalgic. Has Blair had the sex-change yet and
if so when is she ready to post again?
Answer privately if you want Blair.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Always provided good opinion and debate did Blair, ashame we haven't seen him/her in so long.

I remember someone mentioning once that the name is actually an anagram of Brainy Male

{Ed002's Note - Blair occasionally makes an appearance with #WonderDogSparky and will soon be opening a "Parlour" with one of the new housemates - the club hairdresser Kirikou.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Good point where is that Boy? Maybe he's ken aguero with a different ip!

Agree0 Disagree0

I swear its Ed002's alter ego!

I think Cissokho could use a trip to Kirikou's

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 08:09:03
1.Just wanting to say Suarez is very much like Maradonna as I think their moral compasses are alike as well as the natural talent(and let's not forget their worldcup handball moments). Hate him all you like but you can't ignore the talent and if you separate the talent from the morality of the man, without saying he's right up there with Messi at the moment though I do think he's more passionate.
2.I'll be very happy seeing him deployed on the right/left of Sturridge when he returns as he will see a lot more of the ball and also draw the defence out, and pull the markers off sturridge and it would create so much more space for Coutinho to ping balls through.
3.What concerns me about this lineup of
Suarez/sturridge/Moses
Coutinho/Gerrard
Lucas
Is that the team will seriously Miss the defensive capability of Henderson. Honestly I feel Gerrard has missplaced far too many passes and attempted way to many hollywood balls rather than keeping it simple so far this season. In the smaller games I would love to see Gerrard rested and Henderson given a chance in that Deep Lying Playmayer roll that BR has set for Gerrard(I think he can really make that position his own when Gerrard retires)
4.If Moses is on a loan to buy, it would be a great chance for moses to learn all he can from Suarez before he leaves.
5.Clubs don't normally plan for the January tranfer window but I think FSG, now that they've strengthened the defence will look to bring in 1 or 2 more experienced wingers in January and look to send Sterling & Ibe(if he turns 18) on loan for the remainder of the season.
6.All in all very happy with how the club is being run. FSG may not be running LFC like other clubs are being run. BR's way of managing may not be like other managers. But LFC are not like other clubs. And we shouldn't want to be like anyone else. LFC are being taken back to the beginning. This is February 1970. Shanks rebooted.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Agreed with almost all the points but I don't wish Moses learns "all he can" from Suarez because he is defo going back, Though I hope he contributes all he could.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 08:02:23
ED01 - Not Liverpool related but can I ask your opinion of the job Trevor Brooking is doing, I can't see that he acheived much but I don't know what is going on in the background? I remeber reading that are are not impressed with any of the England set up from the U21 downwards & I wondered if it was the same with Him? (by the way great footballer)

Just had my 07.45 check & yes we are TOP OF THE LEAGUE, i'll check again @ 09.00 & let you know if it changes!

Luigi Riva {Ed001's Note - I think the fact that I am not actually sure what he does says it all! The whole England set up is a shambles and he seems to have done nothing at all about changing that. He was a great footballer, but he is not a great football administrator, decisions are still taking too long to be made and the ones being made are the wrong ones. English footie needs a decisive man, someone with a plan of action who bulldozes their way through others to get it done. The international teams should be cherry picking the best coaches etc from the country. Instead it seems England get failed and utterly useless dross like Pearce etc.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

In a weeks time we'll still be top of the league. Get used to it.

Agree0 Disagree0

Cheers Ed01 it's not just me then!

Pirate - I am getting used to it & I am absolutley loving it.

YNWA

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 13:29:45
The guy is a flake. Appointed as nothing more than a PR stunt in my opinion. He will bring nothing to the table. The whole FA is clueless.
For a start, there are biased members in high ranking roles. My biggest quarrel is similar to Ed001's. We push the wrong coaches.
Look at the last 2 coaches of the U21's team, and the last 4 of the England team! Pierce (style: defensive, 'hoofball'), Southgate (style: defensive, 'hoof ball'), Capello (style: defensive, low tempo), McClaren (style: defensive, counter attacking), Sven Goren Erikson (style: defensive, 'aim not to lose') and Hodgson (style: defensive, 'aim not to lose').

Its not just because all British managers are defensive. There are some brilliant young British coaches who like to get the ball on the deck and play fast, fluent and attacking football (Holloway, Rodgers, Coyle). Rodgers is fast becoming the perfect example of what happens when you give a young manager with his own attacking philosophies a big job. He is making it his own, and creating a Liverpool side that nobody wants to play against right now. Holloway and Coyle in my opinion deserve to be thrown in at a big club. Yes they got relegated with Bolton and Blackpool, but that's because they break the 'Hodgson, Allardyce and Pulis' mould where you set up your team 'not to lose'. That doesn't give young British players a winning mentality, it sets them up to spend there whole careers fearing losing! Look at what Coyle has done with Aston Villa and Bolton before that, and Holloway with Blackpool and Palace. They have made them into young, exciting teams, who may or may not get relegated. But they will do so trying to win every game, and playing good football. I'd rather that, than Sam Allardyces flat back 9 with Davies/Carroll up front for a big hoof! I don't care if that keeps you in the Premier League, it does not develop the right kind of players. This is where money is killing the game. Staying in the premier league is worth too much money now to risk relegation just for the sake of entertainment and development. Young English players won't get a chance at top teams who like to attack, because their squads are packed out with high salary foreign players. So they are forced to go on loan to lower placed sides. There's the problem, because look at the style of football the majority of them teams play? It's no coincidence in my opinion that 2 of the brightest prospects in British football (Sturridge and Wilshere) both found their feet in Coyles Bolton side. I love the way Rodgers is leaving gaps in his squad for young academy graduates to try and stake a claim. That is how every team needs to be. As time goes on though, even the top teams are getting more and more defensive! Under Rafa, none of our youngsters developed at the rate they should of, because he was too defensive and set them up with a 'do not lose' mentality rather than a 'win at all costs' mentality. Now we have ugly styles like Mourinho's and Moyes' in the top teams to deal with! Absolutely world class technicians like Kagawa and Mata are being left to rot on the bench because they are not physical enough, or don't get stuck in enough. The same will happen to all the technically good youngsters at both clubs.

Its getting to the point now, where the majority of the young players in England are actually having their ability coached out of them! The standard training session in England is; turn up, stretch, jog a bit, practise heading, practise tackling in a large area, have a match to fill in the remaining time. The absolute worst has got to be the '2 touch' match. I mean for god sake, yes it improves your first touch, but it eliminates intelligent runs and stops players getting there heads up. You can't make an overlapping run for someone who only has 2 touches. He has one to control it, then there is a player on him instantly. But rather than take a touch to go round this player or give himself a better passing angle, he must just hit it to whoever is available. It turns into a panic match of people flicking it around the defence. It is essentailly kicking skill out of the game and teaching kids to always take one touch and then pass to the easiest option rather than try something that requires a bit of flair, and might actually carve an opening. In my opinion, any time in training you don't spend with the ball is wasted time. Reading some of the players thoughts on Rodgers sessions, Brendan agrees with me. What is stopping you jogging around the pitch 5 times whilst dribbling a football? Or 10m shuttle runs with the ball at your feet, so you have to stop and turn fast on the ball? I could go on all day about this to be honest mate, so I'll stop before you all get bored! But the whole system needs to change in England, from the sizes of youth pitches, right the way down to the coaches employed. Sorry for the rant!

YNWAdam

Agree0 Disagree0

Adam you make some fantastic points, and though I'm not English or even British, the points you make regarding the style of play advocated at a lot of mid-table sides in the EPL and whatever SPL that I manage to see, is a defensive style. Yet I think it's the same in Spain and Italy too I'd think. Not a lot of mid-table teams would take the risk of going all out in every game and risk losing the 1 point they may easily get if they were to just shut-up shop as they say.

As for midfield play-makers, I don't really remember any genuine playmaker from the British Isles. They generally produce a lot of wingers and box-to-box midfielders, which as you say is largely down to the coaching styles at the grassroots level. The maximum number of technically-gifted players come from the South America as the football they are brought up on is largely street-bases, which as anyone who's played even a little of street-football would tell you, requires very good close control and dribbling ability. But seeing that Spain and Germany of late have been producing some world class technically-proficient and creative players, it does tell one that a drastic change is required at the basic level of coaching in England. The emphasis on physicality has to come down and footballing skills must be the focus of development

Another point I'd like to make is the inflow of humongous amounts of money is damaging the development of young players. With teams like Valencia and Sevilla not being able to compete on the same level of your Barcelona's or Real Madrid's the number of players coming out of their academy has been declining in quality, as the team no longer plays as fearlessly as they did 3-4 seasons back(frankly only Atletico Madrid are the only true challengers to Barca and Madrid in the La Liga right now). Whereas the Valencia team of 3-4 seasons before comprised of some great home-grown talents like Mata, Silva and Villa the current team's main-stays are not Valencia-academy graduates.

But since La Masia and the Madrid academy themselves develop a lot of world-class players, Spain and similarly Germany with the likes of the Dortmund, Schalke and Munich academies do not have a tough time in finding players for the national sides. Unfortunately in England the top-sides do not produce enough world-class, homegrown talents who can truly push onto the national level.

I know it's a rather long read, but just my opinions being an 'outsider' to European football in general. Would love to know others' opinions on this topic. Especially yours, Adam ;)

Thanks and enjoy!

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 05:50:01
Hello Eds,

Whats the situation with David Amoo? As far as I remember, he was playing at Hearts on loan last season and did reasonably well so as to warrant the club to produce the merchandise. Is he ready for the first team football in EPL?

Is he still with us or has he been moved on? It would be an exiting proposition to have him as an additional attacking option. {Ed002's Note - He left when his contract ran out last year.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Think you're thinking of Ngoo, he has gone to yeovil on loan for the season.

Agree0 Disagree0

Mate are you from Maharashtra? I'm asking because your surname is quite common here!

Agree0 Disagree0

VGRed my friend I am from Maharashtra. Seems to be a lot of Indians out here :)
YNWA

Agree0 Disagree0

Okay! Where exactly in Maharashtra mate? I'm from Pune!

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Sep 2013 05:49:04
Been looking at the league table again, yes again, and did u know that already, 6 of the top 7 are the teams we expect to be in the top 6 come the end of the season? The exception? Stoke, who we beat on the opening day.

Also, interestingly enough, there are only 2 other unbeaten teams in the league, 1 is Chelsea, anyone care to have a guess who the other is?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Everton.

Agree0 Disagree0

We are the only team with a 100% record.

Let's hope it continues!

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Sep 2013 21:08:05
Just want to say well done to ed002 for getting the Illori deal spot on!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Sep 2013 00:13:17
Not Liverpool related, but look up ed001's story about Harrison Ford and a pot noodle. Pure gold.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Hilarious.

Funny how these Hollywood types are usually such tools.

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Sep 2013 23:58:54
Hey lads just been on united site an reading a few posts, do they still think that ferguson is manager ozil didn't go to united cause they didn't bid for him they did ask his agent if he would come and sign for united, they were told no .

Lesson of the day welcome to the real world no fergie equals not much quality.

Striker 9 {Ed001's Note - not true, Ozil waited to see if United wanted him, they turned down the chance to sign him. Moyes didn't want him.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

To be honest, who might not be a Liverpool player through and through but I find it respectable that he did not just hand in a transfer request and leave. I think it shows maybe he does have some love for the club as well as the fans.

Agree0 Disagree0

Wow! What kind of a coach doesn't want a player like Ozil?
I think Man Utd. are 'broke'. I don't mean bankrupt. I mean broke in the sense that their owners have drastically reduced how much they can spend on players.
The excuse that Moye's doesn't want Ozil is just a cover for the fact that the money pot has been withdrawn, imho.

Agree0 Disagree0

Incredulous, but true. Apparently Moyes sees the no. 10 position as Rooney's and not a vital area of concern, or he doesn't rate Ozil that highly to pay over 40 million.
Not sure what is logic was but United fans are livid. Btw can someone tell me what position Ander Herrera plays?

Agree0 Disagree0

Ozil has way too much finesse for Moyes. If he could drag Duncan Ferguson out of retirement he would

Agree0 Disagree0

Any clue why Moyes wasn't keen on him ed? {Ed001's Note - probably because he hadn't had time to do his usual checks on his background. Moyes dithers because he takes a long time to decide, he likes to know everything about a player before he moves for them.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Hmmmnn, I agree with the points raised by jcanRed and cozinoz. But I still feel something is missing.

Even if you have Rooney in your team, come on, it is still Ozil we are talking about here. Most sensible coaches will move the end of the world to get him.

Couple that with the appointment of Moyes himself. A man who is generally thought of as being able to get the best out of squads built with limited budgets.

I think something is amiss at old Trafford. I think the money pot is much smaller. Remember the rambling earlier in the summer about the lack of budget and being able to buy whoever they want to buy? That was unnecessary and might be a diversionary tactic.

Agree0 Disagree0

Is it possible that United are saving their pennies for a massive buy next summer?

Agree0 Disagree0

Moyes thought he was getting Baines, Herrera and Fabregas. They have plenty of dosh in the piggy-bank but no-one who knows how to negotiate deals properly

Agree0 Disagree0

The Everton fans used to call him dithering Dave. They lost a lot of players this way

Agree0 Disagree0

Manchester United are still massive but with moves at the helm I think they have lost a load of there pull when it comes to buying players .

I don't ever think fabregas would play for a moves type team or ever will that lad has way to much class hence Fellini good player but just an upgrade on the old dogs of war type player joe royle used to love, could be wrong just don't see Manchester United using that chest trap the way Everton did .

Striker 9

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent