Liverpool Banter Archive May 05 2017

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

05 May 2017 23:26:58
Draw out of mancs and arsenal will do me fine . and I think palace could get a point at city to 👌👍 we owe Southampton a good drumming fingers crossed.

Believable8 Unbelievable1

06 May 2017 06:33:47
Pity it's not possible they both lose. a draw or even an Arsenal win will do nicely. Either way Southampton is the result we really care about. Think we'll take this one.


06 May 2017 08:43:17
It's s great weekend of footy

Think I'll give the missus the Barclaycard and tell her to stay at her sisters 🕺.


06 May 2017 11:38:29
That sounds costly mate. Just get her a bottle of prosecco and lock her in the shed Imo.


05 May 2017 20:42:19
According to the list of players we have looked at, is Porto the new Southampton?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

06 May 2017 02:14:33
I'm a bit nervy about Southampton.

Especially about the early kickoff

I'd much prefer playing all our games with evening kickoffs.


06 May 2017 10:05:41
I doubt we will buy a single player from Porto. They would demand ridiculous transfer fee for their players which will put us off.


06 May 2017 18:39:24
We are interested in Porto's Ricardo Perreira (RB on loan at Nice) and they are willing to seel for about 22m so that's not too expensive.


05 May 2017 18:50:59
I have a Theory about piracy regarding sly sports and others in the UK and would love to see what you guys and EDS think about this. long shot but maybe a possibility.

Right so we all know the sports packages in the UK are just crazy and you don't get all the games, the prices go up every time they (sly or bt) sign a new contract for the games.

Now where my theory comes in is that look at the amount of people that use Kodi or get the match on illegal streams, they are not contributing to thre crazy payout to buy the games.

If we all started paying it could go either way, they could drop the price as of course they'll make much more money and benefit all win-win. just like the cinema its bloody dear to go see a movie (cause of piracy? maybe. i think so) if we all went to the cinema instead of going on Kodi or online it could drop the prices.

but back to the footy. If for talk sake (on the up side) everyone paid and didn't go on kodi etc the prices could drop and happy days OR! iit puts even more money to the English teams and prices continue to rise.

Not sure if im making sense but yeah! what's your thoughts!?

Cheers for reading have a good weekend, don't drink to much ;) and let's hope for another HUGE 3 POINTS!

Believable1 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - it doesn't work like that. They say it does, but that is false. They price it to make the best possible profit, like everything. I remember when CDs were introduced and they were cheaper to make than vinyl or tapes, yet they charged many times more for them. It was the same with DVDs, they ripped people off for years by charging more than for the same thing on video even though it cost them less to make. Perhaps if they stopped ripping people off, people would be less inclined to turn to piracy. I know most people I speak to would pay a fair price rather than use Kodi.}

05 May 2017 19:21:16
Thanks for the Reply Ed01! bit of a change in subject for you haha!

But i agree there is both sides sadly and due to the greed what you said is most likely the way but hey! we can dream right!

I Pay for both the packages in the uk cause im a mug haha but i also use kodi for the games that are not included in the package! which is a bloody joke. this 3pm kick off nonsense needs to go as other things but footy seems to be moving forward so we may see it in the UK. like hell the Video Ref is coming which i think will be amazing for the game if used correctly :) if its tested in the world cup then hell that is the biggest stage there is. the game should be further forward technology wise than it is due to the money. Rugby is doing a fine job in that aspect with a lot lot less money.


{Ed001's Note - the 3pm thing is to protect lower league clubs who have a large number of fans who go to watch their local teams when they can't watch their own team. I would hate that rule to go, as a large number of clubs would fold if it did.

The video ref is a terrible idea, in my opinion. It doesn't work in rugby, it stops the game for far too long and makes it more like those awful American sports, which are more stop than go. Having seen the video ref in action in the A-League this season, it could be a complete disaster. One decision they got wrong, despite making the wrong decision initially, then restarting the game, players protests made the ref stop it and go to the video ref, who then agreed with his initial decision, which was wrong anyway! All of it took over 2 minutes to sort out and yet they came up with the wrong decision. May as well get it wrong quickly, just keep the game moving. I would rather see the rules speed up things, rather than slow it down. If players go down, unless it is a serious injury, take them straight off the pitch for any treatment while play goes on. Things like that would improve the game, not a video ref.}

05 May 2017 19:25:06
Prices rise as demand rises. Sly wouldn't see 3 million new customers and think 'oh we can reduce the amount our existing customers pay'. They would see 3 million new customers and think 'more demand means our product is worth more money' and raise their prices exponentially.

That is the way big businesses work. They are profit first, customers second. Just be glad you aren't an employee as they usually come in third!


05 May 2017 19:38:47
MK that's true but when sky got the latest contract they (well apparently) had to make cutbacks and also rised the price of non sport customer prices cause well they apparently had to make sacrifices and cutbacks which also affected the non sports customers. Sky would die without the sports and i personally think they are struggling i was paying about £120 for everything including bt sports. i cancelled and 1 year later (now) i have it all minus the movies and bt sport for 15quid a month. 12 month contract at that price oh and i got 3 months free (this month is my last free one as i apparently had money on my account lol)


05 May 2017 19:42:24
Speaking of going the cinema being expensive have you seen the price of popcorn? Haha
You pay about £20 a ticket as well, walk in and your usually the only one in there, that's one industry being killed off by greed.
Back onto football, I would love to see a Supporters telly package, where you get ALL the games of your team of choice live then they show a selection of the other games later on or the next day plus highlight shows of the other games. I would happily pay for that, I would never pay for the likes of Sly or BT to watch 1 or 2 games a month.


05 May 2017 19:46:18
Ed01 I agree in a way as im Northern Irish and the football teams here have been struggling well. it started with the Troubles then now they are struggling due to the money but hell our wee teams use to do okay in the old CL :) now no one has ever heard of Glentoran, Linfield etc outside of the UK (if that) . so i do agree on that.

The video ref, more testing needs to be done its early days. if they can do it right then awesome if its like you said then don't bother but the money that fifa are making should be helping the sport become better and be open to new ideas. one thing for sure we need to get rid of diving it is getting unreal now (i was having this discussion with a united fan as lucas dived in the box the other day which was proper awkward)


{Ed001's Note - I would rather the refs just watched the game back afterwards with the ability to make retroactive decisions to award cards and/or bans. The less messing with the game itself the better.}

05 May 2017 20:09:52
1985! that's true haha you now have to hide you own sweets and what not down the baggy trousers! but a supporters package would be nice, hell charge a season ticket price for it long as i can see every game im happy (i go to quite a lot of games too, minimum of 8 a season) but the option would be good and i agree Ed! how come players don't get punished from diving etc after the game as its talked about on the post match talks! players should get punished for it as it is cheating.


{Ed001's Note - I personally think they don't want to admit it is a problem here and most of the rest of the world see a dive as clever play, sadly.}

05 May 2017 20:14:13
Eds! just a thought and a bit of an odd one BUT have you ever thought of starting like a video chat room for supports to go in and talk and use (eds) get involved too? a quick google and there is a place called tinychat which you can have your own password locked rooms? or add it to this side?

Just a thought! be interesting!


{Ed001's Note - Benny Baller did suggest it a while ago. Not really something I can see the use in most of the time to be honest.}

05 May 2017 20:26:47
Wait LOL i know diving is huge with foreign players but they actually see it as "clever play"? now that is messed up! Out of everything that is the main thing that needs taken out of the game.

Ohh okay so would i be fine for one of us to make a Liverpool Rumours room and post the details here? will it be used? who bloody knows but it would be there for what ever :)


05 May 2017 21:32:11
All the sport you could want for £30 a month, what is people problem with sky?

They do loads for community aswell.


05 May 2017 22:21:13
it should be like tennis where the manager gets to challenge a refs decision once per game. I think this could rid goals that wrongly get called offside as well as dissallow goals that are offside. would help stop bogus penaltys and award proper penalties. you will also get managers behaving themselves as they won't be able to moan at a refs decision especially if they can challenge their decision with video replay.


05 May 2017 22:29:57
1212 Seriously? All the sport you want? going by just football you need Sky and BT to get the most out of it and you still don't get enough.

The problem people have with sky is the fast they are over priced, look at BT, Talk Talk, Virgin etc etc there full package that is the same as skys is much cheaper. also Murdoch owns sky.

How don't you have a Ploblem? lol.


05 May 2017 23:48:32
I would rather get rid of penalties for fouls inside the area than use a video ref. I might get slated for saying that but think of the positives. Players would stop diving to try and win a pen, refs would be freed from the pressure of making immediate and direct game changing decisions, controversy surrounding those decisions would largely dissipate. Keep reds for last defender fouls and direct free kicks in the area. Just a thought. Vid refs would be useful for incorrect offsides that result in a goal for or againts.
On KODI, admittedly I use it for games not on the packages. I don't live in Liverpool and I want to see my team play! I'd gladly pay top price for high quality access to EVERY Liverpool game, but that's not happening so KODI it is. I want to watch and support my team and I can't afford to trek to Anfield every fortnight. I agree with the eds on the need to keep 3pm games off tv for the smaller clubs, but I don't feel that should hinder my access to watch the team I live, breath and love to my core.


06 May 2017 06:36:47
I'm not based in England but I find it ridiculous you can pay a fortune for sky and still not get every game. SingTel in Singapore isn't cheap but at least I can watch every single match in the entire PL

I also recommend LFC TV - delayed but excellent coverage and good for catching up or when you just want highlights. and at least the money goes to the club.


06 May 2017 08:40:32
What are these tapes that you refer to Ed?


{Ed001's Note - something I saw on Guardians of the Galaxy....}

06 May 2017 11:43:49
I've always liked the idea that you should be able to award penalties even if it was outside the box. It would stop the refs having to decide whether contact was in or out, whether it continues etc. If it's a foul, and there was a chance to score, it's a penalty.


05 May 2017 17:45:59
Ed do you think the future of the kop maybe rail seating like at celtic. Make it general admission so that kids can stand with their mates and the atmosphere will come back.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - no idea mate. However the atmosphere will not come back because of standing. It is not going to come back while 90% of the crowd are too busy playing games, taking photos or recording vids on their phones. Every club is struggling to get a proper atmosphere.}

05 May 2017 18:06:14
Ed am I right in saying its law in the England that all top flight games have to be all seating, and it would have to change before any standing could be introduced?


{Ed001's Note - I don't know off the top of my head. Sorry.}

05 May 2017 18:47:13
Genuine question why does anybody feel the need to stand for 90 minutes to watch football.
Much more comfortable to be sitting not being knocked in to etc.
If the fa or whoever is in charge of allowing this did allow standing to happen I think it would be a disaster.
It would be like being in a mosh pit more bad behaviour and sorry to say it end up in sceens similar to West ham utd early in the season.


05 May 2017 19:06:36
Amazing that Liverpool fans of all fans would even consider it!

No thank you. My local side had a standing section when I was younger (Rushden and Diamonds), but it was almost always empty by the time they got rid of it. It was just unsafe, uncomfortable and full of knuckle draggers.


05 May 2017 19:08:04
Agree with Walter.
I don't know why anyone with any knowledge of Hillsbrough would even "go there" with this subject.
Some of the best atmospheres I've experienced have been in all-seaters. You don't need to stand to create an atmosphere.

I think it would require a change in the law and I think that is very reassuring.


05 May 2017 19:24:39
Thanks Ron you put over my point much better than I did. What you said is so true good on you sir.


05 May 2017 19:45:42
I think the modern football fan is different as well, more reserved and less likely to shout or sing in public, all the last generation who did shout and sing are usually half asleep these days due to old age 😉.


05 May 2017 21:02:43
Obviously a different sport but my local rugby team has a standing section. It's always dead whereas the seated part it packed. I don't see how it would add anything to be honest, it's uncomfortable to stand that long and not terribly convenient. Wouldn't necessarily increase the capacity either.


05 May 2017 23:50:34
All the loudest away fans stand at the match.

I would compare it to an ale house, whereas you sit with yer bird for a quiet one, and you stand up at the bar with the boys for a rowdy one.

Seating should be for lazy gets, arl ones, day trippers, people with packed lunch boxes and the corporate weak clapping lot.


06 May 2017 10:04:03
I'm sorry but i completely agree with the original post and believe it is the very first thing we need to sort out.

The reason so many so called 'modern football fans' are rife at the games is because they are forced to sit down. It makes you drowsy, depressed when its not going well and kills the atmosphere completely.

If you had at least half of the seats being standing, the camera toting boo boys would definately think twice about whether they wanted to go. To hell with comfort and leaving before half time to get a pizza, it isn't theatre, a tourist attraction, its a football club. People seem to have totally forgotten what that means. You should be going to a football match and having a great time win, lose or draw, and it is an OBLIGATION to make noise for 90 minutes and support your team, not a choice.

I came to this realisation about standing up when i was at a gig some time ago. 75% of the people there were standing up, making lots of noise, having a great time, in a safe, controlled environment. The other 25% were in the upper tier, sat down, looking fairly glum and passive but still appreciating the music. I remember looking at this and thinking if we just applied that idea to anfield how much better the games would be, bringing in the younger fans who want to create an atmosphere and have a good time, while not completely alienating those who are not capable of or do not want to stand for 90 minutes.

I also think its a total embarrassment that everton, despite having far less income than us, provide more affordable tickets and actual deals and incentives to get young fans into the ground, and we cannot. I really do believe all of this is the very first thing we need to sort out if we are truly change the fortunes and attitude of our club for the better. You want people to stop moaning and being pessimistic? Maybe if they were allowed to have a great time at matches no matter the result, that would be achievable.


06 May 2017 10:06:18
Yes MK Scouser, it truly is amazing that a fair few Liverpool fans would actually prefer to be objective about this and recognise that safe standing in 2017 is indeed safe! It grinds my gears when 'super fans' like you try to shame other LFC fans out of even talking about the idea just because of one tragically mismanaged day in a completely different time almost 30 years ago. It's like refusing to ride in a 2017 BMW car because in 1989 your friends were killed when their old Ford Pinto's brakes failed.

I bet you're one of those LFC fans who shouts down any talk about safe standing while drooling about how good BvB's Yellow Wall is.


06 May 2017 10:08:50
Of course safe standing would improve atmosphere.

- Groups of mates can stand together instead being allocated into seats in various parts of the ground. Everyone knows it's easier to create an atmosphere when you've got the camaraderie of mates sitting together.

- Nobody sings when they're sitting down.

Atmospheres are only good in big games because *everyone* in the Kop naturally stands up for them. The problem is against small teams when everyone is sitting down and you have to be that brave bastard to stand up amongst a sea of silent people sitting down and, sadly these days, risk being told to shut up by a local, which is what my mate saw when he went to the Stoke and City matches.

Yes, smartphones have been a nuisance, but they're not going to go away, so we need ideas that mitigate their negative effects on the atmosphere because we can't just ban phones. If people are all standing up and getting bouncy, then don't you think they're more likely to forget about playing games on their phone?

There will be an argument that all-seating used to work at Anfield, but only until phone technology got better and clusters of mates sitting together reduced. Seriously, it's not hard to figure out why away fans produce much better atmosphere: they're all standing up, and there is more camaraderie. That's it.

People who want to censor discussion about safe standing because of Hillsborough can go screw themselves.


06 May 2017 10:09:26
I'd be more inclined to just put large signal blockers around the stadiums so phones just don't work, well at least get signal or connect to the net.
Or just flat out ban phones in stadiums or make a Douchy area beside the smoking area for phone users!


06 May 2017 12:06:28
I'm 20 years old and a student, and I've got a load of Liverpool fan mates despite being from about 70 miles away from Liverpool. Me and my mates would love to go to a game together and I guarantee we would be chanting for the full 90, the problem is it's practically impossible to get tickets, and even if we did get tickets they wouldn't be together.


{Ed001's Note - it is really not that difficult to get tickets, nor to get them together. Have you tried joining your local supporters club and speaking to them? Most official supporters clubs get an allocation of tickets, they can often have a batch that get returned unsold, which are the ones you usually find being sold on the day on the website.}

06 May 2017 17:09:15
T-Diggity, you hear scousers bleat on about tourists supposedly ruining the atmosphere when in actual fact, many tourists actually want to sing. But how the hell is a tourist expected to start songs when not even the locals will do it? Locals that, by a considerable quantity, take their weekly visits to Anfield way too much for granted.

My mate was sitting in the main stand against Stoke, and a tourist nearby tried to get a chant going. A scouser sitting near him yelled at him to shut up. Tourists like you aren't the problem, you're the excited ones who want their rare experience to be actually as awesome as possible.


06 May 2017 18:20:35
Thanks Ed, I hadnt thought of that so I'll have a look in to it, the times I've tried on the website I've just never been successful unfortunately. And I think you're right Robin, you should never be told to shut up for supporting your team. I wouldn't say I'm a tourist as such though, I used to go fairly regularly when I lived in Merseyside and my step dad had a season ticket but I wish I could go more. One thing I've noticed at football games in general is that the season ticket holders will chant for a bit of the game but then spend the majority of the time bitching about the team, what use is that?


{Ed001's Note - a friend of mine used to get his tickets through knowing the head of one of the supporter's clubs. He would only get offered the unsold ones before they were returned, but he used to manage to get to 10+ games a season that way.}

06 May 2017 19:17:05
I'm definitely going to have to check that out then, thanks Ed.


{Ed001's Note - hope it helps.}

07 May 2017 10:10:35
Yeah I know you're not a tourist per se, but you know what I mean. a Liverpool fan on a visit to Anfield rather than a weekly routine. That's part of the problem, some locals take it for granted and treat it like some any old routine.


05 May 2017 17:21:26
Mharez anyone?

Believable1 Unbelievable6

05 May 2017 17:49:04
Id prefer mahrez tbh, has more experience in the PL and more quality.


05 May 2017 18:00:55
He's naturally a RW which is a non starter for me given we have Mane. At his price we need someone naturally LW.

I'd also have to call his attitude into question after he stopped playing for ranieri this season.


05 May 2017 19:08:25
Imagine the next AFCON when we have built our team around a Senegalese and an Algerian!

It isn't worth it just for all the posts asking Ed002 if we'll sign Promes to cover a player away for 4 weeks!


05 May 2017 20:17:11
He's had a shocker this season. Second season syndrome plus he won't be available for AFCON. So no thanks.


05 May 2017 20:31:43
I would not touch any LC player for that reason, 87red even tho I think Mahrez is class.


05 May 2017 16:35:21
Hey
Does anyone else agree with me that should Chelsea cash in on Willian we should be at the front of the que for his signature. Versatile attacking player scores goals etc I personally think he would fit in nicely an he is a proven premier league player.

Believable8 Unbelievable11

05 May 2017 16:45:13
Has a good workrate but not good enough from open play. Excellent at set pieces but pretty average at everything else.


05 May 2017 16:55:34
Plus he already turned us down when he picked Chelsea over us in the 1st place.


05 May 2017 17:01:58
Mickmullin, what actually happened if my memory serves is that we didn't meet the requested fee, Tottenham did, and then Chelsea stepped in while he was undergoing a medical with them.


05 May 2017 17:12:26
I think he'd be a very good player for us. Definitely wouldn't have any complaints if we signed him, but I think it's very, very unlikely.


05 May 2017 19:14:19
Would be a very good option for us if Coutinho left in my opinion. He is a proper left forward who scores goals, and would solve our set piece issues.
He probably has less open play on the ball ability than Coutinho, but he is much better off the ball. He makes unselfish runs and presses excellently.

Wouldn't knock signing him at all. Even if he only scores 10 goals a season and they are 80% from free kicks, so what? How many free kicks do we score at the moment? I think Coutinho has 2 and that's it. 3 games left and we have 2 goals direct from free kicks. When we fail to break down these compact bus parking teams, William can step up and bury one of the 15 free kicks they give us around their box. Or put one of our 10 corners in a decent area for Matip or Lovren to score.

I think he'd be a great signing. Maybe not the best player, but in my opinion the right player for what we are missing.


05 May 2017 19:56:40
Agree with MK here.


05 May 2017 20:34:15
I wouldn't want him, TQ. He has a good work rate but very little quality compared to mane and Couts. He can run all day but then, so can Mane and Couts who have better end product and quality than him.

He was ahead of Couts in the Brazilian setup but now, he can't even get a game and is not fit to lace Couts' boots. We can do better than him at a cheaper price.


05 May 2017 21:06:08
I honestly think he would be a decent signing for us. Can play either side aswell. And yes would sooner have coutinho playing but he is another option an maybe it would give coutinho chance to play a little more central to start splitting defences open with some pin point passes into the channels for the pace of willian an mane too run into.


05 May 2017 23:52:27
Best player by a mile for Chelsea last season when all the other lot had a cob on and bottled it.

A very good player.


05 May 2017 15:22:39
A player I've liked the look of since he came into the scene, but isn't getting any chances and now his agent is saying needs to move on. ihaenacho at city. Seems skilful, eye for goal and a talent. I suppose we're looking for more finished products and people will say we don't need another kid, but he's shown his potential in the prem already. I'd like to see us move for him, what do u think of him eds?

Believable2 Unbelievable3

{Ed001's Note - not for me, far too raw and would be below Origi in the pecking order.}

05 May 2017 20:37:21
I like him as a player, Origi is too far ahead of him right now and needs to leave City in order to develop, IMO.


05 May 2017 22:27:02
His scoring rate is off the chart good. I'd be delighted if we could get him.


05 May 2017 13:07:21
Is there interest in .................
Cheers.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Wrong page - this is the Liverpool page.}

05 May 2017 10:52:24
Good news coming in today over the expansion of anfield road end and to conduct a feasibilty to add 8-9k more seats.

It looks like a positive decision will be made as the recent attendances for matches have mostly been in the 53k although i understand that's not the only aspect considered.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

05 May 2017 11:44:01
Eds is there any way the club can expand the stadium beyond the expansion of the anfield road end? I really think 62,000 isn't enough for a club like liverpool who have a worldwide fan base. We could fill 90,000 this weekend if we had the seats I think. If there were more seats ticket prices could come down. I love Anfield and always will but think we should of built a stadium on Stanley Park when we had the chance.


{Ed002's Note - No. (a) Liverpool do not have the money to pay for the new infrastructure that would be required. (b) Liveroop do not have the money to expand the stadium that far. (c) The ticket pricese would not come down and it will take many, many years to pay back.

Not going to happen.}

05 May 2017 12:51:17
I had the same question but bringing it to 62k would br a great acheivement and credit should go to fsg

Also avg 60k attendance will be easier compared to 90k.


05 May 2017 13:11:29
Correct me if I'm wrong eds but I think that one you go past 60k you need rail links into the stadium area?


{Ed002's Note - Yes, the infrastructure needs to be beefed up.}

05 May 2017 13:17:09
I don't even think FSG are looking to expand the Anfield road end.

Correct Ed002?


{Ed002's Note - They have planning permission for Phase 2 that runs through to 2019 and could be extended. It will be a costly exercise.}

05 May 2017 10:25:18
Who would you lads say our most improved player this season is then? The eds can feel free to give their opinion too.
It's between Migs and lallana for me. Lallana probably edging it because we have still shipped a lot of goals and he's added goals and assists to his game and as well as being very effective in the middle, whereas we were basically playing with 10 men at times last season when he was out wide.
Credit where it's due though Mignolet hasn't had a clanger in a long while and I don't believe he's at fault for the large number of goals we've conceded. They mainly come from lapses in concentration ahead of him. Although I suppose you could say if he was more vocal organising his defence that wouldn't happen, so that's where he can improve next season for me.

Believable7 Unbelievable0

05 May 2017 11:00:38
I'd go for Lallana, though he is still showing signs of inconsistency. Shout-out for Mignolet, and Hendo has excelled in the deeper role.


05 May 2017 11:03:15
Emre Can has improved through the season - plays so much better when Hendo is not in the team. Migs has surprised with his recent improved perfromances. got to give him credit, must have been a kick in the balls to be dropped to no.2 at start of season for him then to come in and play with some confidence.


05 May 2017 11:23:24
Roberto Firmino.


05 May 2017 12:49:11
TAA and woodburn, with brewster coming in third. For the first team has to be migs.


05 May 2017 12:51:03
Lallana for me. I wouldn't have been upset if we'd sold him last summer. He was so frustrating, clear ability but always slowing down play and ruining attacks doing numerous cruyff turns. Now since being put in the middle he's become instrumental to our style of play. Running his socks off every game. Using his tricks and ability at the right times to keep possession and also moving the ball on quickly when necessary most of the time. On top of that he has chipped in with some goals. It's great to see him still improving and long may it continue.


05 May 2017 18:14:16
Lallana? He improved for about 4 months and has now gone 5 months without a goal or assist.

Not for me. For me it is Mignolet. He's gone from being an undeniable liability in every aspect of his game to now making saves he should be making that used to go through his rubber wrists, and also being confident and decisive on crosses and set pieces. Kicking is still wayward and he is far from top class, but last season he was League 1 or League 2 quality, and now he doesn't look out of place in the Prem.


05 May 2017 19:50:21
Going to be controversial and say Milner, he's been pretty solid at left back, not spectacular, but you said most improved, don't think he had ever had a good or solid game for us until this season. I would still replace him though.
To be honest a lot of players have improved dramatically this season, Lallana stands out, as does coutinho and Can.


05 May 2017 19:57:55
Roberto Firmino, by a mile compared to last season.


06 May 2017 06:41:16
Llalana or Firmino - both have stepped it up to be real talismans this season. Firmino I feel still has another step up to go.


{Ed025's Note - i would say another 2 or 3 zimbo..

05 May 2017 10:21:37
Has ....

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Wrong page - this is the Liverpool page. We are not answering questions about random players here.}

05 May 2017 09:25:48
hey eds with Clyne is it that he gets a start instead of TAA because he is a bit better defensively or is it just that JK wants to wait until next year with TAA and also hope Sturridge starts on Sunday.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - TAA is just being slowly bled into the team ready for next season.}

05 May 2017 09:55:17
Klopp has ready said TAA needs to work of the defence Side of the game.


05 May 2017 10:17:58
Likely that TAA might be our starting RB next season ed?


{Ed001's Note - rotation more than starting every week.}

05 May 2017 10:49:33
If clyne leaves and we get a left back in, can you see TAA and Milner being rotated at rb or will someone be brought in to replace clyne?


{Ed001's Note - the plan is to buy a right back. I am going to get rsi repeating myself like this.}

05 May 2017 10:55:15
One on one I think Clyne is a better defender, but in terms of tracking a player and covering at the far post I've seen more from TAA than Clyne in the few games he's played.

We'll see more of TAA next season and with more games his confidence will increase and I say by the end of the season he'll be our no1 RB.


05 May 2017 11:28:14
Periera is seen as Clyne's replacement. So Periera as first choice RB while TAA will be his understudy. Milner will rotate on the opposite side with the new LB we sign. Hope that helps clear up stuff for posters repeating the same questions for Ed001.


05 May 2017 12:04:53
The plan is ..........


{Ed002's Note - You are getting to the point you are wasting everyone's time again - please cut it out.}

05 May 2017 12:52:04
fair enough mate. Sorry.


{Ed002's Note - No problem.}

05 May 2017 19:58:01
Scarface, Perreira is miles better than Clyne and I hope we get him. And no, Clyne is by no means, a good one on one defender. He is slow to react, doesn't close down crosses, a perennial ball watcher and often caught out of position. Non e of these issues suggest that he is a good defender at all.


05 May 2017 00:02:16
A question for Ed002. With the UK leaving the EU under Brexit will this cause issues with the purchase of overseas players, such as work permits and the exchange rates?

Thanks

Baz.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Exchange rates are unrelated to Brexit and vary for a veriety of reasons. It is not actually clear what would happen with work permits. There would certainly not be any overnight change but the eventual position would likely be a need for work permits and residence permits. In terms of existing EU citizens already working in the UK, there is no plan but I would think an amnesty would be the likely decision followed by a quota system of some type. A good question but no firm answer I am afraid.}

05 May 2017 13:14:35
Nice answer Ed002.

Just wondering if one result of Brexit could be that it becomes easier for clubs to sign players from non-EU countries such as South America and Eastern Europe as visa/ work permit rules change.

Cheers in advance.


{Ed002's Note - No.}

05 May 2017 20:01:11
As with everything else, Brexit will lead to an exodus not an influx.


05 May 2017 06:59:49
{Ed's Note - We have posted a new article entitled, Weekend Premier League Preview

Believable2 Unbelievable0

05 May 2017 12:49:42
Cheers ed! Always have a look at these before placing a wee bet.


{Ed001's Note - welcome mate, I hope it helps.}

05 May 2017 14:57:10
Really good read Ed, thanks!


{Ed001's Note - cheers FN.}

 
Change Consent