Liverpool Banter Archive June 03 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

03 Jun 2014 22:29:11
i'll so take hangeland on a free transfer, solid defender good experience

Believable0 Unbelievable0

03 Jun 2014 22:38:25
Been on the decline for 2 seasons, imo. I'd sooner call Sami Hyypia out of retirement.

Agree0 Disagree0

No pace definitely not what we need trying to play a high line

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 23:54:00
Absolutely not!

Agree0 Disagree0

In my opinion, we don't need an old, tall and stiff CB to cure are defensive issues.

Agree0 Disagree0

If this was 2010, I'd probably take him.

Agree0 Disagree0

I wouldn't and thankfully BR wouldn't either.

Agree0 Disagree0

I wouldn't and thankfully BR wouldn't either.

Agree0 Disagree0

Agree two years ago yes but not good enough for us now

Agree0 Disagree0

@ the OP.

Is that you, Roy?

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 21:35:38
Hey ed1, bit of a random. Would lambert of played with gerrard in the youth ranks before he moved on?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Ed001 will not be around for a while.}

I was thinking the same. Lambert's 32 though and Gerrard's 34 so unless Lambert was playing a couple of ages above himself (which I doubt seeing as we let him go) then I doubt it. Might have known each other though!

Agree0 Disagree0

Maybe, Lambert would have been in with guys like Stephen Warnock so its a possibility.

Agree0 Disagree0

Can't remember where but an article I read when he first signed said he was in the same age group at some point.

Agree0 Disagree0

It's got to be doubtful. Stevie signed professional papers at 16 so he was already playing above his age group meaning that Rickie Lambert was unlikely to have played with him but would certainly have been aware of him.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 21:34:53
Evening Eds

Things a bit quite today. Is there any update please in your eyes on Can and Moreno?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - No.}

Read in the press that Tottenham have submitted an offer of £14m for Moreno + Soldado on a season long loan. Pochettino want Moreno as his first signing.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 21:15:58
Happy birthday Liverpool football club.
Hopefully nobody forgot to buy a cake. Ha

Believable0 Unbelievable0

04 Jun 2014 01:43:55
Lack of Bentley was the issue. If the Super Mario rumours are true then perhaps he has that awful camo one still kicking about.

Agree0 Disagree0

I have a camo onesie it's the best thing ever mate haha

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 19:45:59
Dont shoot the messenger after reading this post please. I think that Lamela (not to be confused with Lallana) can be quite decent for us. He looks down and out, and had a really poor season, but I think BR can work wonders on him if given the chance. May be cheaper than Lallana, now that a clear out is happening at Spurs. If we an get to his best from his Roma days, and he is still very young, could be signing of the season. Or he could remain bad. But this is a risk I would like to see being taken.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Sure as hell not going to happen.}

Why on earth would we want to sign Lamela when he has clearly shown that he wants to return to Italy?

Made of plastic.

Agree0 Disagree0

Lack of knowledge boys, he is very happy with spurs as is lloris and both will be playing at spurs nxt season

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jun 2014 13:13:41
Lamela happy at Spurs? Yeah right. Maybe it is you who is lacking in a bit of knowledge.

I cannot imagine him being happy about not playing pretty much the whole season, in a World Cup year.

Agree0 Disagree0

Yeah but are spurs happy with him they could still cash in

Agree0 Disagree0

Did he not go home to Argentina suffering from depression?

Agree0 Disagree0

Chiswick, are you still pretending to be a LFC fan?

Lamella is, as I predicted, rubbish.
I hope he stays at Spuds, it's funny.

Agree0 Disagree0

^^^silly boy^^^

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 18:36:04
Hi all, I was just wondering is Rickie Lambert the oldest player Liverpool have bought in the premiership years .

Believable0 Unbelievable0

One of the eds can correct me if I'm wrong but reidle was 33 and I think mcallister was 35

Agree0 Disagree0

Think gary mac was

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 19:31:00
Kolo Toure?

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 19:33:52
And gary mac was amazing
Just goes to show sometimes you can buy someone in their last couple of years whi can do a job

For instance if we had the option to buy gerrard for a couple of years now of course we would :)

Agree0 Disagree0

Ricky lambert was purchased using the clubs excessive stock of green shield stamps . hence the nickname licky lambert.

A memory foam bench cushion and walk in bath with personalised grab handles will be provided.

Age however is not an issue stated the players agent Roger Milla.


YNWA

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 20:10:06
How old was Bellamy?

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 20:49:20
Don't forget Jari Litmanen and Morientes

Agree0 Disagree0

What's this about Green Shield stamps now?

Agree0 Disagree0

Pelligrino was in his 30s

Agree0 Disagree0

How old was God when we re-signed him?

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jun 2014 00:02:26
How old was Paul jones when we got him in from Southampton? Must have been at least 35.

Agree0 Disagree0

Rigobert Song was 45 when LFC signed him. allegedly.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 18:04:59
Why is Muriel not in the Colombia squad for the world cup? Is it injury or is it that he's not good enough? If there is no injury, I think people on here should realise that isn't quite what he's made out to be.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - He rarely plays for his country. He is not seen to be good enough.}

03 Jun 2014 19:08:04
That is the same Luis Muriel lot of people here want to replace Suarez by the way.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 22:41:39
Just like some folk suggested Aspas would replace Suarez. Let's just face it, no1 can replace him, better to stick with the deadliest striker on the planet. Poor us

Agree0 Disagree0

The real AG, sturridge will take Suarez's place and someone like muriel could potentially become the next sturridge, if Suarez was to be sold next summer.

Agree0 Disagree0

No need to spin the story, Hyach. Muriel`s not good enough to even be on the bench for Colombia so why would he be good to be a starter for LFC?

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jun 2014 13:18:30
That is not how it works for every player. Muriel has struggled with form, weight issues and injuries since he has been in Italy.

Last season, he was a regular at Udinese and struggled badly. I think he scored 4 goals last season.

Agree0 Disagree0

He might be one of those players that we look at because he might be considered to be an "unpolished diamond" like Coutinho.
I have never seen him play so I can't really comment. can't help it though!

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 17:51:28
A lot of bickering lately between who is better, Sturridge or Van Persie. Despite being 6 years younger than the latter and out scoring him, I don't think he is all that far away.

How long did it take Van Persie to score 20 goals in a premier league season? Sturridge in his first full season in which he was first team selection got 21 goals.

Sturridge is a fantastic player, however I do believe Rvp is a better striker. This could change though if sturridge maintains this form.

Despite all of this though, they're comparing their best striker to our 2nd best? Suarez wins hands down, hence the reason sturridge has been compared to him instead. Just thought I'd get this out in the open, a lot of waffle over that side! Cheers

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I know who I'd rather have.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 19:09:58
Where is this bickering happening? I haven't seen any on here; must be on the Manc page.

I wouldn't worry about it; these are the same folks who thought we would finish 30 points behind them last season.

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jun 2014 11:58:14
You prefer your player, we prefer our player. Isn't that wonderful.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 jun 2014 17:21:00
now this may not end up on the banter page but as there are no major topics for discussion today goes
as ed has said suarez will have to decide whether to go to spain or not and he may well leave
now we are obviously looking at some targets though no knowledge has been disclosed
so a question for all posters and ed001 who would you like to see from the following list of players with reasons(we may have no interest in these players but just some who are available )
take your pick and no cavanis and agueros
julian draxler
stephan el sharaawy
mario balotelli
angel di maria
cesc fabregas
alexis sanchez
pedro rodriguez
karim benzema
thomas muller
pierre emerick aubamayeng
ezequiel lavezzi
others (please specify)

Believable0 Unbelievable0

03 Jun 2014 17:47:59
If Suarez were to leave fro Real Madrid, I would be interest in Angel Di Maria as part of the deal.

If Suarez moves to Barcelona, I would certainly try to get Alexis Sanchez in the deal.

I don't see anybody else being able to afford him/make a move for him.

Agree0 Disagree0

I'd ask for Di Maria as part of a deal for Suarez. That lad is INSANE! I'd try and get another striker in as a replacement. How about Mandzukic? Thought on him guys, not really seen him play much. Alexander Pato or Leonardo Damiao could prove a success at the club. It's a difficult question to answer:/

Agree0 Disagree0

Hi reet,

Not sure if you mean as a replacement for Suarez or not. If we are talking replacement then Sanchez or El sharaawy. If someone in general then I would love us to buy ilkay gundogan

Agree0 Disagree0

Some more options
leandro damaio
jackson martinez
edin dzeko
alexander lacazatte

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Just to be clear these are all just random names.}

Don't rate di maria in the slightest. Headless chicken half the time for me. Mueller and sanchez I would take.

Lavezzi is absolutely shocking for such a highly regarded striker

Agree0 Disagree0

For once were using banter page for the right reasons

Agree0 Disagree0

Alexis sanchez

Agree0 Disagree0

Messi ;0)

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 21:40:05
Alexis Sanchez for me too. Whilst we're playing fantasy football, can we use (some of) the remaining proceeds for Javi Martinez? Now that would be a mouth watering prospect.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 22:44:14
Ricky lambert

Agree0 Disagree0

Get the money up front and buy Aguero + Rooney + Chamberlain

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed003's Note - we are taking the p a bit too far now.}

Yeah ed all these names are just random strikers
plus everybody will only get to pick one as a replacement for suarez
alexis sanchez seems the favorite though I wouldgo for el ssharaawy
the only player in my view who can replace suarez

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Do you mean Stevie May?}

Yeah ed because Stevie may would be the perfect replacement won't he

Agree0 Disagree0

Isco and £70m, which would love to see spent on Ross Barkley and Javi Martinez/William Carvalho.
I'd opt for a 4-2-3-1. Sturridge up front. Isco, Barkley and Sterling behind. Martinez/Carvalho & Gerrard in front of defence.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 16:42:22
HI edds . I for one don't care how much it cost to sign lallana I think I is a brilliant player and for me better then fabregas I would have him any day and I think we would be a much stronger side with him on our side . what do u think?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I think it is best for all of the fans who still want to see Lallana at Anfield to move on.

Southampton will only sell if their price is met. If we are not willing to go more than our last bid which was a reported £25 million then no deal is going to happen.

Southampton have every right to ask whatever they want but there comes a time where it is best for LFC to walk away which most probably has happened. No disrespect to Southampton but Lallana just ain't worth the money they are asking.

Agree0 Disagree0

I'd prefer him to Fabregas. but I still feel that we should stay away unless Southampton lower their valuation, which as the eds said is unlikely. We could get two good younger players for the £30m that is being quoted. I consider the age of 27 as 'getting on a bit' and Lallana is a year from that. Of course he does have a good 3 years left until his peak as a player. I will of course back whatever decision is made regarding transfers because this is Liverpool Football Club and we have Brendan Rodgers in charge. The summer always excites me for all the transfers that are made:)

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 17:48:39
I would just go fro Shaqiri or Konoplyanka.

Agree0 Disagree0

A transfer request might help things along a bit.
But saints have said they won't sell anybody until the new manager is in place. I am guessing that's going to be the case as well.

Agree0 Disagree0

A transfer request might help things along a bit.
But saints have said they won't sell anybody until the new manager is in place. I am guessing that's going to be the case as well.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ag kono and shaqiri are different to lallana rogers clearly wants a player like lallana who he so far is willing to pay a large 25 million for maybe more who knows so I ask why people keep saying 2 fast wingers who are nothing like the player rogers wants

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 19:40:31
We would meet their valuation with a strange package. BR is adamant and wants him at any cost. We don't have any concrete interest in any other player, apart from rumors (ACM/CM). This proves We would get him.
That would still leave a hole at LW?

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 20:34:44
"Strange package"!
Suggest PAYING THE FEE might be an acceptable package, but may be seen as strange in some eyes.

Maybe there is some confusion here between a charity and a business.

Think this one will have to wait until after the WC now. No benefit to Saints to conclude before then. If Adam does well then his fee could increase, if not LFC may lose interest-either way Saints would not be too concerned. Adam has 4 years left on his contract so Saints have no reason to be rushed.
Who knows, a new manager at Saints and Adam might even recall his words of a year ago!

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 22:54:19
After Lallana plays well against Italy, we'll offer 30m. We should get it done now I think, if he is, as reported, our "top target", then we should pay the money. It's not being "held to ransom" it's paying money for the wanted player. I guess we bid lower just to test the resolve and try to negotiate but if it doesn't work we should go for it. I think the wingers thrown around this site are too coveted, Ibe is ready, and Suso played well out wide last year. The only reason we would need a winger is if Suarez goes, Sanchez or Pedro perhaps. Lallana, Moreno, CB, CM is all we really need I think, CM less so. Lallana, Moreno, Lovren, would be a good summer. Vorm, or any goalie with good distribution, and Can would be a bonus.

Agree0 Disagree0

@ rrethan
Disagree with most of what you're saying. I for one don't think we should just pay what Southampton ask for just because he might be our top target. The club would go broke if we followed that logic.

In terms of the wingers, Ibe didn't even nail down a place in the Birmingham City team when on loan but now he's ready for a top 4 challenge and a run in the champions league? Suso is much better in the centre too.

And the only reason we would need a winger would be if Suarez went? Disagree again. I think we need a winger regardless and anyway Suarez isn't a winger.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 16:20:36
Shola Ameobi to be signed as an Aspas replacement.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I do believe you have won at this rumour game. That is one of the best I've heard yet.

You sure this isn't a smokescreen to buy Sammy Ameobi?

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 17:29:47
Not the best; that goes to someone who actually reported that Manchester United are going to sign Luis Suarez.

Agree0 Disagree0

Touche

Agree0 Disagree0

Yep.
Suarez is off to Manchester United for £65m.
He is happy to have helped LFC to qualify for Champions League, and has stated "I just want to play for a team challenging for Champions League Place. However, I do not want to play in Champions League, hence a move to Utd is ideal, no Champions League football but they will try to challenge for a top4 place"
LMAO

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 15:52:30
Hi ED thanks for doing a wonderful job mate to all the ED's I know we are not the easier of fan or supports. I just one question beside this form which new pager or websites would you recommend that has a good source of real information on our targets for this summer transfer window

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I have no idea, sorry.}

Oh yeah I'm sure you were more then likely to get a list of competitors then! Just out of interest if you found such a site would you still come here or cut out the middle man as it were?

Agree0 Disagree0

The Guardian usually has decent reports.

Don't rely on their daily rumours section though, which is largely just for fun. But their 'stand alone' articles usually hold some merit.

Their reporters at least try to have some standards. Which is good.

Agree0 Disagree0

None is more reliable than BBC Sport but do not believe the gossip column like The Guardian

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 12:37:16
The bible known as the metro is stating we are going to "hijack" arsenals bid for serge aurier. Would you know if there is any truth to this Eds?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I don't know anything of it.}

Thanks for the response :-)

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 22:41:56
I honestly thought the Aurier links wouldn't crop up until World Cup MotD fever set in.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 22:42:18
From the media, not the OP, obviously.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 12:23:37
Do you think Harry Wilson will get game time on the first team in preseason and maybe in the league cup next season?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Wilson is too young right now. Maybe in a season or two. He's only 16 though. Not many 16 year olds are playing at the top level!

Agree0 Disagree0

Not a chance! He'll be lucky to play half a season in the u21's & maybe first choice in the u19 champs league

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 19:13:18
Harry Wilson was a regular for the U-18's last season and I think he will be a regular for the U-21's next season.

Brad Smith, Ryan McLaughlin, Jack Dunn and Joao Teixeira are the players I expect to feature for the first team next season (if they have not been loaned out).

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 12:22:24
A couple of questions for everyone (reasons not necessary)
1-would you loan out ilori and keep Skrtel /sell Skrtel and keep ilori
2-Lallana or Shaqiri who is more needed and better value for money
even the eds Can chime in

Believable0 Unbelievable0

1. Loan Ilori, keep Skrtel.

2. Shaqiri.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 12:46:20
Sell Skrtel. For me, he is a big risk for us each game. Especially the way he is all over players in the box. It is only a matter of time before he starts getting pulled up for it. I also think we would gt a decent price for him at the moment.
I've not seen a lot of Illori, but believe he has a lot of talent and is wanting 1st team football, so it is difficult because i'm not sure if he is ready? However, I would like Agger to stay and to alternate between Agger, Sakho, Illori and Toure.
I think the best way to strengthen our defence personally is make a decision on Mingolet.
He needs to have a bigger presence in the box and if BR thinks he can deliver that this year then to keep him on and let him play, otherwise he needs to be looking at other options

Agree0 Disagree0

Why not buy both Lallana & Shaqiri as they are different players and will offer us something different.

Ilori should be given pre season to show what he has to offer and then a decision will be made.

Agree0 Disagree0

If we buy lovren then sell yes. Agger too (unfortunately).
Toure, sakho, lovren and Ilori would be great. But I doubt Ilori will be happy with that. So loan him out and use Kelly.

Agree0 Disagree0

Big d
because we just don't have that much money both will cost in excess of 40 million
we have suso why spend 25 million on lallana

Agree0 Disagree0

Shaquiri. If Lallana is going to cost more than £25m I'd rather just give Pelosi or Teixeira his place or sign Shaquiri to give us another attacking dimension and make the youngsters compete with him. Lallana and Shaquiri would be a waste. They are different players but we'd never fit them into the same team without dropping Sturridge or Sterling.

Agree0 Disagree0

1 - loan Ilori, sell Skrtel but buy a replacement ready such as Lovren
2 - Shaqiri as Lallana is overpriced.

Agree0 Disagree0

1. Sell Skrtel. He is at constant risk of giving away a cheap goal or failing to deal with an attacking threat - our defence won't be able to feel either calm or confident whilst Skrtel is there. Not sure if Ilori is ready for first team football either. Think a bigger issue personally is Johnson - he undermines the entire right-side of our defence. If we sign a left-back and make Flanno our first choice right-back then this will perhaps give whatever centre-forward playing at RCB next season a bit more confidence.

2. From a purely footballing perspective Lallana makes more sense. The problem is that the difference financially between Lallana and Shaqiri is fairly substantial. If we don't get Lallana for whatever reason (monetary, he chooses another club, etcetera) then I'd prefer us to look at Konoplyanka again - Shaqiri's conduct off the pitch at Bayern is somewhat concerning IMO.

Agree0 Disagree0

Loan ilori keep skrtel

Lallana is a better player than shaqiri imo.I hope we sign him

Agree0 Disagree0

@ MIKEY

Not sure how you can advocate Kelly when he has barely played for 2 seasons and has a big question mark over his fitness in future due to the terrible injury problems he has suffered. Would be incredibly high risk from the club to have him, even as back up, given these unknown quantities that surround him. Think Ilori needs to be given some game time so he can get used to the English game and hopefully develop into a valuable asset for our club.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 14:25:37
Truthfully. If we sold Skrtel and didn't replace I'd be worried.

Who here would be confident with Toure and Ilori as our only senior right sided centre-halfs? Not me.

Keep Skrtel, sell Agger. I like Agger but it just makes more sense.

Agree0 Disagree0

I like skrtle just makes some costly mistakes, would have to say give llori a chance preseason go from there, but would need to replace skrtle probably.

Isn't shaqiri younger than Lallana? Like Lallana a lot but at any more than 25 million would rather have shaqiri and suso/teixaera given a chance to step up.

Agree0 Disagree0

Puzzled Red - who does that leave as LCBs then, just Sakho? I agree with you to sell Agger but your logic doesn't make sense, imo, seeing as Agger is currently the only comfortable backup to Sakho at LCB.

Seano - Skrtel is dodgy I do think but I wouldn't think playing a centre forward at RCB is going to help :)

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - There is interest in Lovren.}

Absolutely agree puzzled red. We would be in a lot of trouble if toure and Ilori were our right centre back options. Agger should go out of the two, I prefer skrtel and I think he gets a lot of unfair criticism, he had a good season last year. Lovren in with agger out is a good move. Sakho, skrtel, lovren, Ilori, toure is a good set of options.

Agree0 Disagree0

Lallana for me n then kono and shakira for dressing room showers n singsongs

Loan Lori again n sell skyrtl or agger if we can get a replacement

What role does anyone see toure playing next yr, league n fa cup games n back up I'm thinking

Agree0 Disagree0

Am I the only one who is more comfortable with Skrtel than Toure?

Agree0 Disagree0

Sean - lovren mostly plays LCB for Southampton but is right footed. He can slot in on either side

Agree0 Disagree0

Jgs92 - that does make Lovren even more appealing so. If he was to be signed I couldn't see him being interested in being backup though so I'd imagine he'd want to start with Sakho.

jcanRED - Toure's a hard one to call. At the start of last season he was great, by the middle of the season he was a mess. I think it's a case of wages, etc it would not be feasible to have both as backup (assuming Lovren or someone was signed to start with Sakho). Then you compare the financial side and we can get decent money for Skrtel, we wouldn't for Toure. When Toure's contract expires then he's gone and we have Ilori back from another loan.

Agree0 Disagree0

@ sean Ireland

to be fair I don't think Andy Carroll could be any worse if he was played at centre-back ;)

Agree0 Disagree0

We have wisdom as well seano. Kelly is highly rated and will suit centre back better than right back as it may help with injurys. But I do get your point.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 12:05:10
hi eds and all I see kolarov looks to be leaving city imo he would be a decent lb for Liverpool to sign and would not break the bank either. eds has br had a look, also I have read Liverpool are looking to try hijack arsenal signing serge aurier do u know anything about that what a class signing he would be and we could get johnson off the wage bill and maybe pick up afew mil for him as well maybe.i would love to see us sign aurier imo this young lad could well be the best right back in football in afew years to come especially if br got his hands on him me thinks

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Liverpool want Moreno.}

Ed you mentioned that Sevilla only want cash and not suso
so is the club willing to match the valuation
and has a bid new gone in yet

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - No acceptable bid has yet been made.}

Cheers for the reply ed

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 12:00:30
Hi Ed002,

as per our initial transfer activities, we are moving for attacking players plus left back. But no concrete bid has been made for any CB. is it down to the fact that we have so many CBs in the squad and we are actively looking to sell them (agger, coates) and then we will bid for a CB like lovren, caulker.

Or do you believe no CB will be bought this summer.

Thanks for your time

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Liverpool are interested in Lovren - I have said this on may occasions.}

03 Jun 2014 11:59:35
Just a quick update.

I've heard from various sources that we have rekindled our interest in Konoplyanka. He is seen as a cheaper option than Shaqiri & will definitely be cheaper than Sanchez. In my opinion skill-wise & attitude-wise Konoplyanka is better than Shaqiri. Konoplyanka could have found it very easy to throw a strop after the whole January debacle, but he did not, Shaqiri on the other hand is a tad arrogant (not necessarily bad) but he works, atleast on the field, a lot less than Kono.

The Lallana situation is black & white. Southampton have a price, Liverpool have a price. At this moment in time there is a difference & until that is resolved he will remain a Southampton player. As I have said before the club would love to get a deal done before the World Cup, It's looking unlikely. The situation is the same with Lovren.

The Can deal will probably not happen before the world cup. In this instance I am happy to report that we are prepared to meet the valuation placed on him, but there is still a contract dispute to fix with Bayern Munich. If we can get him it will be a great signing. He is a very versatile player (can play DM, CB, LB, LM, CAM) & he's also rather talented too.

Finally I'd just like to say that, as a fan, how nice it is to see Rickie Lambert 'come home'. It makes me so proud to be a Liverpool fan when I hear the passion in his voice when talking about the club. The fee is £4m with add ons, and for me that is a steal. He adds another dimension to our already formidable attack, this will be essential for CL.

PS: Welcome back Macca. Nice to see you back on form mate!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Agree with all that u say above mr pistol

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 11:38:59
fox sports oz sayin suarez to Manchester United for 120 mill

Believable0 Unbelievable0

03 Jun 2014 12:47:59
Wouldn't sell them a virus.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 12:41:50
dont think so

Agree0 Disagree0

There is more chance of man u getting relegated

Agree0 Disagree0

Maybe sell them a virus!

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 13:25:06
In other news, England on the verge of signing Cristiano Ronaldo from Portugal

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 11:14:59
Sounds like Emre Can is very close now. Disappointingly though, if we cannot sort out a price for Lallana, then we are going to make an approach for James Milner.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

03 Jun 2014 09:31:49
Interesting poll of the day will Liverpool's place in pot 3 not get them out of the group tbh with a small defensive improvement you could win the thing

Believable0 Unbelievable0

We won't know until we see who we are up against. It would be interesting to do the poll again when we see the teams. But yeah a bit of luck and we can get through.

Agree0 Disagree0

We haven't been in Europe (CL) for a good few seasons - you can see how difficult it has been for Man City with their world class squad. I'd be happy if we just made it out of the group stages to be honest.

Agree0 Disagree0

Im optimistic about playing in pot 3.
I feel we are capable of beating most teams when we are at our best

Agree0 Disagree0

The key word is "ensure" which it certainly doesn't. If we feel that we should be ranked higher then we have to beat the higher seeded sides.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 09:43:57
Was talking with my brother and sisters boyfriend who is a big Liverpool supporter would you like to see Henderson captain the team a couple of time next season Suarez and Gerrard won't be playing most cup and if Agger leaves I can't see anyone more deserving btw we all said he should

Believable0 Unbelievable0

03 Jun 2014 10:07:44
What about Lucas.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 10:24:10
Your brother and sister have the same boyfriend?

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 10:50:12
Lucas is offski

Agree0 Disagree0

Erm, why would Suarez be playing mostly cup competitions with Gerrard? He's 6.5 years younger than Gerrard.

Regardless, I can't see him being captain anyway.

I would probably plump for Henderson after Gerrard, or possibly Lallana (obviously depending on what happens. )

However, we may get some new emerging/bought candidates over the next 2-3 years.

Agree0 Disagree0

Your brother and sister have the same boyfriend? What part of Ireland are you from?!?!

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 11:02:05
I would go Henderson 100%

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes I probably would. If anyone can lead by example it's him.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sakho would be a beast of a captain.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ill give it too Sturridge

Agree0 Disagree0

I wouldn't go for Henderson personally. I love him as a player and his desire and commitment is undeniable. I think a captain needs to have a really sharp footballing brain (which Gerrard clearly has) - whilst Henderson has many positive attributes I don't think his footballing brain is either his best nor good enough to be made captain. Sakho would be a good candidate once he is better established in the squad. I'd go for Lucas but people seem to think he's a going to - that's really disappointing! I've got a lot of time for the lad. Anyone know where he potentially off too?

Agree0 Disagree0

Hasn't hendo captained the under 21 England side?

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 09:10:09
Hey eds. Just wanted to know whether martin kelly will be 100% for the start of next season.? I hope so. I would love to see him next to sakho at RCB at times through the season. Hope all is well eds n reds.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

03 Jun 2014 08:54:37
Happy to see Liverpool sign a player so soon.
Am glad Rickie Lambert joined the club he loves.
Am sure we will give his 100% whenever given chance to play. These are the type of players LFC should sign.
The likes of Gerrard, Agger, Skertel and now Lambert are senior players who will be extremely important in the Busy Season ahead.
Hoping for a great season ahead.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Agree I think Lambert is an incredibly shrewd signing. I know a good number of fans were bemoaning us signing him instead of some world class wonder player but I think, from a footballing perspective, Lambert makes perfect sense. He's a local lad so automatically has the heart and desire to do his utmost for the club. He gives us a completely different dynamic/option up front and one which we did not have last season. On top of that his fee was fairly modest at 4million so even if he doesn't set the world on fire it isn't a big loss financially (like Carroll for example). For me it ticks all the boxes for a smart transfer that has the potential to make an impact on the squad - I hope whatever other transfer business we are involved in is as savvy as this.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 08:50:02
Eds I'm just wondering if there's any kind of preference for loaning our players to BPL sides if an interested one can be found? It seems obvious that it would be more beneficial but I'm sure all factors are considered. Is there reasons, for example, that a Spanish player might be sent on loan to La Liga instead? Was there simply no English clubs interested in Suso or Ilori or was it seen as the best move for their development? If they do end up being loaned would Liverpool prefer Aspas, Alberto, Suso etc to play the season in England if possible? (I know it's the same question rephrased but you get my drift ;)

Believable0 Unbelievable0

03 Jun 2014 07:24:47
Hi Ed:
What are the chances of LFC landing Fabregas? I hear so many rumours I find most of them hard to believe.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Measured how?}

In inches Ed. Most of us here are men and measurements in inches come naturally to us.

Agree0 Disagree0

As measured on the Richter scale, please Ed and then cross checked against the Kelvin scale.

Thanks :)

Agree0 Disagree0

According to Aguero's law of probability it's 99.8% likely.
that he will not be signing

Agree0 Disagree0

In men's inches or ladies inches though?
They are a different set of measurements lol

Agree0 Disagree0

On a scale of 1-10, with 10 indicating a dead certainty and 1 indicating the same chances of Messi an Ronaldo joining, I'd rate Fabregas as a 2.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 08:18:18
Any idea Ilori situation. Please. I was pleased to hear BR got his man, reports suggest he wanted him for LFC. He has had a good season on loan in a decent league.
We are always linked to CBs and I would like to know if Ilori is in the plans. How is he rated.
Thanks

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I can see Skrtel going to Napoli and Lovren coming in Toure might leave that leaves Lovren Agger Sakho and Ilori more than enough and if you add Toure if he dosen't go your back four is instantly one of the best in the league and Moreno on the left Flanagan on the right your have a solid young back four with the experienced Lovren being the Caragher style leader lacked all season Johnson Enricue Skrtel would recoupe all of Morenos fee at least

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 12:43:45
Paddy, I thought it was Agger that Napoli are interested in?

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 13:47:21
It is Agger that is of interest to Napoli. I don't see Toure leaving as it might cost us quite bit.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 08:10:22
Banega being quoted as available for around 8 mill and Bertrand part of a deal for around half of that to another prem club. Have we decided against both of these players previously linked to us? On another note the prices for players just seems ridiculous now. David Luis goes for 40-50mill because it's PSG and Chelsea transfer then another player I would regard as no better or worse goes for 4-5 mill from say Villarreal to Sunderland sure the top players you could argue should, go for top money but the disproportionate figures make these windows crazy. I no it's about what a club dictate the price, to, be and what the other club is willing to sell for, but it defiantly changes when certain clubs and certain players start to get linked.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Do you want Banega or Bertrand? Was Banega not released from Valencia for free last year? And Bertrand isn't good enough, he wouldn't improve us one bit.

Agree0 Disagree0

Harsh on Bertrand, hasn't been given a lot of time to prove himself. I think he looks decent and has a lot of scope for improvement (+ would be reasonably priced). Banega apparently has numerous off-field issues and for that reason alone it'd be better for us to steer clear in spite of his talent.

Agree0 Disagree0

What's harsh on Bertrand? Do you think he'd improve us? Is he better than Flanagan? Is he better than Enrique when fit?

We're talking about the weakest position in our team - we need to sign somebody better than what we already have for LB.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sean Ireland my post isn't specific to those players necessarily it's about the ridiculous fees that are attached to certain players and quoted to certain clubs. I don't know what benega is like now but he was tidy and is only 25 so I wouldn't write him off tho. Bertrand is a BR type player, had potential but we need proven for me not potential in the LB position that's why I'm not convinced by the Seville lad

Agree0 Disagree0

@ Seano

Bertrand?

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 08:00:27
I get infuriated by some of the posters on her with regards to Lallana.

If I have to read once more Ed put we have simply not met Southampton's valuation I will scream.

Its simple guy's.
They want more then we have offered.
No one is being difficult.

Lets put it another way.

Are we being difficult with Stoke with our valuation of Oussama Assaidi?

Same scenario but with us in the driving seat.

If stoke don't meat the asking price and we won't negotiate they will walk away.

SIMPLES.

vrcomp
Y.N.W.A.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

The difference is we don't have an unrealistic price for a player that's served us well & now wants to move up to further his career that's the difference. They don't value him as high as they want us to pay they just don't want to sell so are asking a ridiculous price. This is Southamptons fault not ours as the eds say. They are entitled to not sell but the fact they have put a price on him means they are willing but only for an unrealistic inflated price. We want to pay about what he's worth, a fair pricefor both clubs. We aaren't trying to rip them off with our offers.this is Southampton being deliberately unreasonable

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 12:51:01
I don't see a problem, they want to keep hold of their best player and we either have to match that figure or look elsewhere. It's not rocket science and we do the same and made us keep Suarez last year.

Agree0 Disagree0

@ fanatic viewer

But he is a Southampton player - they have every right to put whatever price, reasonable or unreasonable, on his head. I don't really see how they are being awkward - this is business, he is a prize asset and they want substantial compensation for his loss. We'd surely do the same with Suarez no?

Agree0 Disagree0

Fanatic viewer, no, just no.

Agree0 Disagree0

I am glad some other fans on here agree with me.

Assaidi.no way worth what we are reported to be asking. So are we being difficult?

If RM (or any team for that matter) tried to buy Suarez for £50 mill and we waned MUCH more. would we be being awkward and stopping him "moving up to further his career?"

If we don't value Lallana as much as they do and we are not prepared to match it, walk away and find someone else.

Not draw it out over weeks maybe month's to end up either paying the full asking price or walking away.

The Eds have said all we have to do is match what Southampton want for the player. Obviously we are not prepared to do this so just walk away now.

vrcomp
Y.N.W.A.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 07:57:10
Just back from hols n watched Richie lambert interview, how excited is he! Here's a stat for you. No Liverpool player has come off the bench n scored the winner since joe cole in 2011. Now that is what BR has bought our man for in my opinion. Last season when we were struggling he bought on aspas against Chelsea and he was ineffective as he has been throughout so the lambert signing will change things big style :-)

I'm thinking borini and aspas will go TBH, book balancing is still important to the club. The other names that will leave have already been mentioned so it's just a waiting game now and the rumours board will be frantic come the window.

Just one question, as the window doesn't officially open until July how can the deal for lambert have gone through and he can be sat in LFC colours and unveiled?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

03 Jun 2014 11:17:24
If I'm not mistaken the deal is completed but is yet to be ratified with the FA processing the official documents. That I imagine will happen in the early hours of July 1st.

Agree0 Disagree0

Seen the video and he is absolutely made up. Only problem is I think I am going to have to buy a bigger tv to fit his smile across it!

Agree0 Disagree0

I hope we keep Borini. If we do play with 2 strikers up top next season then Sturridge and Suarez will need to be rotated more to keep them fresh due to the more intense schedule - Borini did well at Sunderland, I think he deserves another chance.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 07:50:05
Here's a question for fellow reds:

Q. Emre Can or Will Hughes? I would imagine the price would be in a similar region for either (£9-12mil)

I have to confess I haven't seen much of Can before it was announced we where interested. From what I've read he's versatile which is a big box tick for BR's prefared player profile. Apparently he can play LB as well as CM or DM.

Will Hughes is player I've been aware of for some time being a Football Manager/Fifa addict! (But back in the real world) I've watched him only a few time including the Championship play-off final. He played about 60-odd minutes and looked lively and had plenty of drive.

Both have time on there hands at 20 and 19 respectively. It's a tough call, what's everyone's thoughts?

Would you sell Lucas and replace him with either? Or keep Lucas one more year as a squad player whilst either 'beds in' to their new club.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Brilliant question because it's so hard to give any definitive answer. In both cases you'd be gambling on potential as opposed to actuality. That said I like the jib of both these lads but I think Hughes will cost more than Can (slightly). dammit, I can't decide, lol.

Agree0 Disagree0

Can on his versatility (haven't watched either but read that can can play several places

Agree0 Disagree0

I like both but Can is cheaper and has experience at a big club and has played CL. Therefore he's further on. Different players who would be deployed in different positions by Liverpool though.

Agree0 Disagree0

I'd probably go for Will Hughes as we seem to be building up a strong, domestic contingent within our squad - he'd add nicely to that. He also has bags of potential and, for the system we play, would fit into it seamlessly. I've not seen much of Can but, given the contractual problems involving Bayern, I'd think Hughes, if we were going to make a move, would be the slightly better option.

Agree0 Disagree0

I watched a video this morning with all the highlights of can during the leverkusen v dortmund match and my god he gave the ball away a lot. Looked very sloppy, johnson esque.

Obviously one game isn't anything to judge a player by but it really wasnt good, hope he's actually a good player.

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Jun 2014 23:20:00
Hi ed's, was just wondering, when pre-season comes around who are the young players (e.g. Ibe, Teixeira etc.) that BR is thinking of taking with him? Will they have a role to play next season? I no he said recently that he thinks if a player is good enough they'll play no matter the age.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - No idea.}

He will have a look at them over the summer and make his mind up. I think Jorden Ibe is ready to step up now. Awesome potential!
Rossiter, Dunn and Teixeira not far behind.

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Jun 2014 21:37:33
Hi Eds, just wondered whether you have seen much of Shaqiri playing? And what your opinion of him is? I don't pretend to have watched every player Liverpool might be interested in and I also don't think FIFA 14 stats determine whether a player is any good or not. Thanks

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - There is no question that he is a decent player.}

He is a very quick versatile attacking midfielder. He can play either flank, or in the hole and even in midfield if required. He runs a bit like Tevez; very fast, powerful, low centre of gravity and exceptional balance. His end product is a bit inconsistent. He is too direct for Guardiolas liking, but he'd suit us down to a tee. I'd go and fetch him from Munich myself and just forget about Lallana at the price being quoted. He is predominantly left footed but he can use his weaker foot. Powerful long range shot and great at driving beyond players effortlessly. Defensive awareness is not non-existent but needs work.

Agree0 Disagree0

Cheers for that EMS.

Agree0 Disagree0

I was told the reason teams have walked away is due to the players desire to play for real Madrid, his heart is set on it and he is showing no passion to sign for anybody else, also the fans know this and that is why they have turned on him.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2014 03:19:47
Hate seeing others questioning the Moreno interest, seeing that Chelsea walked away. Yes I think the price is a bit high, but this was also the team that found Sturridge not good enough. In BR we trust

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Remember when Mourinho joined Chelsea. How much did he pay for Ferreira? Was he the best RB in the world? Did he overpay? Did he fit into a TEAM? Did Chelsea win the title? You don't look at every deal in isolation. The targets we have all seem to have very specific qualities that we need for OUR team. What anyone else does or thinks is irrelevant.

Agree0 Disagree0

I don't think Chelsea didn't deem him good enough. He was unhappy, wanted to leave and had only 6 months left on his contract.

Agree0 Disagree0

Drew I think it is more to do with why they walked away. If you look at some of the Ed's answers, and on the other team pages, there are suggestions that there were "complications" and that the fans will be happy for him to leave.
It does not sound like it was the cost or his ability? I believe UTD were keen and are now going to pay a lot more for Shaw.
I would think that Liverpool are aware of the issue and have decided to go ahead anyway, so maybe it's not important to us.

Agree0 Disagree0

Maybe he doesn't like london. Maybe he's had an argument in the past with hazard. Maybe he doesn't want to work for moriniho. Maybe he idolises Suarez. Maybe his english is bad. It seems clear that we know whatever this "issue" is and are happy to go ahead with the deal anyway, so trust in our department, and if it goes ahead, get behind the lad. The fans are happy to see him go in the same way that chelsea fans weren't too bothered about us signing sturridge, they think that the money they are getting is more than he is worth. They're probably right, but so was hendo.

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent