Liverpool Banter Archive January 03 2015

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

03 Jan 2015 23:33:49
It is interesting that Stevie today and Suarez in his book have been
fulsome in there praise of BR;

Despite being a self confessed Rafa man I am beginning to feel BR has had a frankly rubbishty hand to play this year and managing Stevens decline is a particularly acute problem.

He has created a lot of troubles for himself I think by his recruitment and team selection. However now it I decided Steven is leaving hopefully it might help the others (particularly Henderson and Lucas) to step up

I know SG is a multi millionaire but it must be tough for anybody to leave the place the have been for all those years.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

SG wanted things we could no longer provide and IMO, he no longer deserves hence, we let him go and a good deal for both parties. BR has created troubes for himself which if the Eds are to be believed and barring a miracle, will be the end of him come this summer.

Agree2 Disagree1

I just am not understanding why Rodgers has until the summer if he is dead set to go? Surely if the second half of this season is written off, a new coach/manager can use this time to see what he has here already to then use the summer with a direct plan.

Otherwise they arrive in June, have 5 preseason games to view our 1st, U21 and academy players. Poor players that need to move on like Enrique, Allen, Lambert and Mignolet/Jones get another chance ahead of unestablished youth

Agree1 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 23:01:08
Raheem Sterling is close to agreeing a new £100,000-a-week contract to stay at Liverpool.

Believable4 Unbelievable2

Disappointing if true. He isn't a $100,000 a week player. It seems Liverpool are continuing to pay our players over the odds.

Agree3 Disagree3

Brisbane, i agree he isn't worth 100 pound a week. But he is the hottest young property in Europe right now. A little extra cash might help keep some talent around so the future might not be as bad as recent years. Barring last year of couse.

Agree1 Disagree0

Aussie, I am yet to be convinced he will even be here in 2 years time, and I yet to be convinced he is the player that the media and many fans go on about. I think while he will be a good Premier League player. I don't think he will ever be great. You don't pay good players $100,000 a week, you pay that and more to your great players. I think Sterling is good, but not as good as many make him out to be.

Agree4 Disagree1

Completely agree with BrisbaneLFC. Sterling has simply got more publicity than any other youngster in Europe because he plays for Liverpool and is English. The likes of Koke, Isco, Jese Rodriguez, Chamberlain, Varane etc have all gone about business without too much fan fare and fuss being made of them but Sterling and his reps have done a very good job of making him look like an incarnation of God. I really do not see what the hype is all about. If Ibe and Suso get the same opportunities, i can see both being the better players in the long run.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - I assume you only read the English press otherwise you would not make such ridiculous statements.}

What will be his release clause - anyone knows?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - "Release clause"?}

Sterling is doing a job for the team at the moment out of position, also when Sturridge is back Sterling will be even better. We need to keep talent like this at our club.

Agree2 Disagree0

Unfortunately stupid wages are paid along with stupid transfer fees.
Yes sterling isn't worth 100 grand a week, but if we don't pay it then someone else will.
Also sterling's value is only going up so keep him on a long contract and when the time comes when he wants to leave, we can get top dollar for him.

Agree1 Disagree0

04 Jan 2015 12:11:24
Correct I think Lavers. We aren't payimng Sterling 100K a week because we think he's worth it, we're paying it because we think he will be worth it and are scared that if we don't, someone else will. The fact we have no 'big names' anymore other than Gerrard - who will be limited from here on in, probably also swayed it. I note that 'performance' figures highly in the bonus element though

Agree1 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 22:15:04
Love to know what was so controversial about my last post

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Nothing, it was just embarrassing.}

Ouch!

Agree5 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 22:12:16
Gutted Gerrard is leaving Liverpool. but here's to hoping Columbus Crew get the signing of the century!

Believable2 Unbelievable1

03 Jan 2015 19:46:48
I must be one of those fickle fans who has been beside the club since the late 50's and back then through to the digital age fans sat around the pubs discussing the team their players or the manager. Nothing has changed in those 50 years or so for me except thatwe can put these thoughts down and have people around the world engage not just the lads down the local. Obviously some of these people are quite immature but it is wrong to berate them as fickle for having an opinion football is a very emotive subject doesn't matter what team you support. I have had to watch a lot of liverpool greats move on some where right to go others could have stayed but no matter who it was there was always this kind of furore
SG is going move on

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - You might want to find someone to explain the meaning of the word "fickle" and then read the posts for the past few years.}

03 Jan 2015 19:54:32
Hi eds this is a post that you may start getting in about 10 months time so I will be the first to ask.Hi eds do you think Frank will take Stevie G back on loan to help with r midfield injury crisis.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

03 Jan 2015 18:45:19
Some of you may remember I had been suffering from ligament strains in both ankles. Today, I would like to give everyone some advice. If you are suffering from an injury, and the doctor tells you to rest it for a month, listen to him! I decided that I knew my own body today and went to play an 11 a side game on a full size 3G pitch and I got exactly what I deserved.

I've torn ligaments in my left ankle and now face up to half a year on the sidelines. I'm currently unable to walk or drive which will affect my everyday life and my work. All because I loved football more than I trusted the doctor. Never again. I implore you all, if you're ever in a similar situation, don't take the risk. A&E isn't the best place to spend your Saturday afternoon.

Physio here I come!

Believable10 Unbelievable6

Get better soon mate! I would hate to be out for that long; a week is enough for me!

Agree3 Disagree0

I concur and sorry to hear you are injured afain, i did the same thing with my achilles. I hopevu recover soon mate.

Agree3 Disagree0

Ouch,

Been there mate, played with a slightly fractured wrist in a cup semi final with a light cast .

Won the game and scored twice but then spent the next 3 months in a full arm cast, with metal pins holding my arm together after finding out I had actually broke it along the bone not across.

The problem is that love of football is able to overcome rational thought every time.

Get well soon mate !

Agree4 Disagree0

Tut Tut Adam

Statistically speaking, 5 out of 10 Doctors talk bananas

3 out of 10 don't, and the other 4 prefer 3-5-2

Eye for 1 being a cyclops can confirm this.


P.s, Automated vehicles have recently been invented.


YNWA

Agree5 Disagree0

Good luck mate.

Agree2 Disagree0

Unlucky EMS, I know how you feel! Was in training a couple of months ago and hyper-extended my ankle on collision after following through from a shot I took. Caught the defenders knee and my foot stretched right back. Went to the doctor and I was told it may be a slight tear in foot/ankle ligaments and I should be out for about 6 weeks. After 6 weeks I went back playing, still felt pain, went for an x-ray and turns out I had broken my talus in my foot. Now I'm out for 5 months! I've only played one game this season, and its the only game we've won all season!

Agree3 Disagree0

Cheers for the support lads. That sucks ROI. Get well soon mate.

Agree1 Disagree0

Unlucky EMS I hope you have a good recovery
I never missed a single minute of football through injury then I broke my leg and dislocated my ankle in a friendly when I was 31
Nobody even near me I just rolled on a divot
And that was that, I'm sure you'll he back soon

Agree2 Disagree0

Hard cheese EMS, hope you get well soon, i hurt myself last week when i broke into a fiver!! LOL, no really mate get well.

Agree2 Disagree0

Get well soon, man.

Agree2 Disagree0

It's unlucky, but I have no sympathy for people who go against the Doctors order! Sorry buddy, as you said, you got what you deserved.

Agree2 Disagree2

03 Jan 2015 22:47:55
Tore my ACL and had cartilage torn over a year ago, had surgery and what not so it's all sorted, it's a long road to get back from any ligament injury so wishing you the best!

Agree3 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 22:51:27
Gutted for you lad. Did my ankle last year ligaments like you and it finished me mate.
Swear I was just going to get the call off Brendan aswel ! I'm terrible, even worse than Aspas so I think i had a chance in getting the nod

Agree1 Disagree0

Is EMS an alias for Daniel Sturridge?

Agree1 Disagree0

EMS; please forward to Sturridge

Agree1 Disagree0

Stay strong, EMS! I had a torn patella tendon in my left knee and luckily, I had no setbacks to the point of going back to playing NFL flag football (we pull opposing players` flags instead of inflicting vicious hits which NOBODY is capable of, LOL) and staying active and in great physical condition. Stay Strong, my friend!

Agree1 Disagree0

I twisted me sock once that ended up in a full ladder.

Agree3 Disagree0

Dude. Danny Sturridge. You should have known better. It wasn't international duty was it?

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 18:36:02
Just watched the Stevie G interview. One of the most emotional interviews I have ever seen for a footballer. He loves this club, despite some of the person supporters who we seem to have these days and think they are smart to decry our great players.
He made it clear that the reason he is leaving is due to the difficult conversation Rodgers had with him, that was the turning point for Steve. let's hope BRs decision wasnt influenced by Pascoe or Marsh.
So no more speculation, he is leaving and will give his all. I personally wish him every success in his new career away from LFC. We love you Steve YNWA

Believable4 Unbelievable0

If it's to be believed that he's leaving because Rodgers wanted to use him less frequently, then is that not what everyone on here has been crying for? If he isn't willing to accept a lesser role, that's on him.

Agree16 Disagree1

03 Jan 2015 20:08:35
The man owes nobody anything I think he is doing what's right for him and his family and in a weird way the club aswell it would be hard watching stevies level dropping where average players are getting the better of him a bit like giggs Gazza at everton.good luck to him. Slan go foill.Y.N.W.A.

Agree5 Disagree0

Why would he want to sit on the bench after being our most valuable player for about 15 years?
That in itself is hard for any player to take.
If you were a Pilot and after 15 yrs service the airline you work for offered you a role as a flight attendant would you take it?
This is the best solution for everyone.
It's hard to accept.
It hurts because he was the main man for so long.
We have lost players of his pedigree before and we will again.
We have to move on.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sorry Tel, Gerrard is leaving for one reason only - money. He wanted more than he was offered and wanted a longer deal than offered. While he may love Liverpool, Steven Gerrard is all about what's in it for Steven Gerrard I'm afraid.

Agree1 Disagree1

Sorry Brisbane i have to disagree. You could feel the emotion in the interview, he has more money than he will ever need. Yes cash is ok, but he wants more than just cash. He has been our outstanding player now for years and will be sorely missed

Agree0 Disagree0

Isnt football a business these days? So we are told anyway! Why would a proffesional footballer and his agent not act in the same manner? Its just the way it is, time to move on i think.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 18:25:42
Hi eds,

Do you see Rodgers playing Gerrard less and less over the season?

I previously saw that you said about our finances, now I don't want to know the ins and outs but I thought FSG were being sensible and not putting LFC into more debt, but have we gone the way of Leeds etc by investing heavily in the team expecting Champions League football every season?

Cheers
Sean

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I suspect SG will be used when required, which won't be every game. I don't want to get in to the money but Liverpool has very significant debt.}

Funny old time for lfc and sg.coming so close last year, I firmly believe that slip was the defining moment despite the fumble by the Sunderland goalie in the man city game, toure's gaff against west brom, sterlings disallowed goal against man city.still, the change this year has been and still is immense.many reasons caused this but Suarez going was main one.I have had kops season ticket 23 years now and last season Suarez took the biscuit.boticelli was an awful replacement lazy, slow and doesn't fit the system in place.for me, cut losses, sell him and boringly for cash and get some pace and finishing and trickery up top.for me i'd go all out although I know chelski wouldn't be keen due to the Moses thing but cech till end season at least.I've been watching EDS replies with interest for a long time and Skytel i agree is a big problem and not good enough so cash in while can, would really like to see what Lori and wisdom could do.Coates could have a chance or be sold, there is sales to be had to get money as EDS says we are losing money so need to sell to buy.like EDS also says, why loan out all these players and keep buying, we have some cracking young talent, let's play them, people like suso, llori, wisdom, rossiter, ibe and on that note recall him straight away.we know sterling can play upfront now so buy a new to supplement studge and have Lambert and sterling to change things.Can't wait for flanno to get back, a proper front footed defender that will get stuck in.we also imp need an enforcer in central midfield, big, strong, pacey and with energy.with sg getting older and now going we have lost pace and power, irreplaceable really but we need to find a new way. Rossiter maybe?i like delli ali and will Hughes, maybe wanyama or de yong, would any big stars come like khedira?i wish. I think we will struggle top 4 this year but then last year I thought 5th or 6th at start.Europa league is probably our best bet as aldo said.sg must hope for trophy and league cup is one we are in touching distance it would be nice to see him lift again if nothing else, and would as always be a good day out.watching with interest EDS views on Brentan and fsg restructuring, dof might be way forward but seems like Br is on borrowed time.big thing I want to say about the new stadium development is do fsg realise what the kop will look like? it will look small, dwarfed and they harp on about it being the showpiece but will seem insignificant to the other stands in a way even the Annie road with a third tier.I know the pillars at end pose problems but architecture is immense these days, they can take the kop higher, there is space to the road, make it steeper and create more leg room and also make the corners with the jaggedy incoming bits into a square and get at least another 5000 seats? don't get me wrong, i like the new plans and they are desperately needed but the kops HAS to have something done to it and soon.great work EDS and love your work, you sure know what's going on.coxxy

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 17:49:52
Alex Song would be IMO a great replacement for Gerrard. His last season at arsenal he played at the base of the midfield in either a single (4-3-3) or double pivot (4-2-3-1) and had 14 assists. He had 5 assists for Van P and I think the majority of them were from his deep lying midfield position. You can see from his performances this season he also has drive from midfield. The reason for all the above is that we all know what you get with Alex Song; tackling work rate etc but people maybe don't rate him as a passer. I think he would add so much to our team in the middle of the park and think this would be a no brainer signing. Do any of the eds know if this is something Brendan and the committee would consider? Clearly he has no future at Barca would be available on the (relative) cheap? Under 15m? First time poster here please go easy on me!

Believable7 Unbelievable9

It's a good shout, he's a top class player.

Agree1 Disagree2

We don't need to buy a replacement. We just need to start playing people in their correct positions and give some of the youth a chance.

Agree3 Disagree0

We don't need to waste money on a DM, we have one in Emre Can and Jordan Rossiter as back up.

Agree1 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 17:35:12
I am surprised with some reactions on here when a legend is about to leave our beloved club. I don't understand why in the midst of this surprising news some people questioned his contributions and seems to disrespect or underrate his role in the team.

A lot of people on here seems remember mostly his weaknesses during his twilight years and glad that he will leave instead of remember what he has done for our club for more than a decade. Some people compare him with Souey, the King, and so on and argue that Stevie is not as good as other Liverpool greats.

I think there is no point in doing so. We never knew how good Stevie would if he play in the 70s or 80s and we never know how King Kenny or other previous greats would perform if they play in the Premier League ere and under Hodgson or Rodgers.

It's all speculation. Why can't we just applaud his achievements and remember Gerrard as someone who spent 17 years in our beloved club and won 10 trophies with us?or just like Ed002 said because he's a Liverpool player so he should be slagged?

Believable5 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - The world's most fickle "fans" decided after the last game that they wanted him out.}

Totally agree . But ed don't tarnish all LFC fans the same please . Cheers

Agree2 Disagree2

{Ed002's Note - This is typical of the moron fans who think it smart to say something like this.}

Tbh I think that Liverpool fans look at what's best for the club and team moving forward. There is nothing wrong with opinions.

Agree6 Disagree3

{Ed002's Note - Right - after the last game they were forming a mob to go and lynch him. A day later they are all in tears. They want the entire team changed every year so they can say it is simply "another year of transition". There seems to be a complete lack of knowledge coming through with this new breed of fans.}

Many of the worlds most fickle fans jumped on the bandwagon when Liverpool were actually winning things.

When they don't win much (which they really don't anymore), the fickle fans question everything down to the cleaning lady.

I suppose it's down to the global game that is football/soccer, and a football fan is becoming a generic fan across the board.

Gone are the days of the true identity of supporting the reds.

They make us a laughing stock, as do many other fans of the big clubs in English football.

Brendan was the messiah, now he's just another football manager who deserves the sack.

Tut tut.

Agree5 Disagree3

It is now the right time that he leaves, for both himself and the club. Saying this is slagging him or being fickle or being an person how? I have untold happy memories thanks to his contributions the past 16 years and they will always stay with me. Recognising a player is past his best and thus in need of playing less, irrespective of his legend status, is neither fickle nor some sort of terrible reaction as both the OP and the Ed are suggesting. Why can't honest, alternative opinion be shared? Or do we all have to reach an absolute consensus because its Gerrard? Utter nonsense.

Agree5 Disagree0

It is not worth commenting on this ill thought through statement. Are Liverpool fans any more fickle than other clubs who are under achieving. Remember last season re United, Chelsea with AVB and Benitez. How many world wide fans do LFC have and what percentage comment on this site? Stupid comment.

Agree4 Disagree8

{Ed002's Note - Liverpool fans are the most fickle - and constantly embarrass themselves about trying to make everything about Chelsea.}

I think ................

Agree0 Disagree1

{Ed002's Note - I can't believe you still want to make this about Chelsea. Let go of it - Gerrard is going for more money - move on.}

I believe it is just this site attracting those "fickle" fans in numbers - more than it is Liverpool fans in general.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Based on what evidence? You appear to be simply making stuff up.}

Not all of us though ed .

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - No one suggested it was everyone - except those that are not terribly bright.}

Why don't you .....................

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Suck it up - Gerrard is leaving for more money. Last week everyone wanted him out - all of the fans were looking to drive the worn out, slow, money sucking leech out of the club. Once he says he is going then he is some sort of god. It is nothing to do with Chelsea. It is simply Gerrard and money - and the fans getting what they want. Then out come the whining little bitches like you who somehow think it is something to do with Chelsea. Embarrassing to the extreme.}

Why do people have to include Chelsea everytime they post on here? It is just pathetic. SG wanted more money and more game time that many in and outside the club including me, don`t think he deserves any more hence, he left and goodluck to him. Fans bitching about him leaving after bitching that he should be gone are doing the very same thing they accuse BR of doing which is, trying to have it both ways. PATHETIC!

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Folk need to try and drag Chelsea into things to try and have a pop at Ed002, and I've noticed a lot of LFC supporters are jealous of Chelsea's money/transfers and their consistent(ish) success over recent years.}

04 Jan 2015 00:48:21
I don't think anyone actually wants SG to leave, I think the majority of people wanted him to be used more appropriately ie resting him more often to keep him fresher for bigger games. It's just some people are better at wording it than others. Wanting him to be used appropriately is not the same as wanting him out.

Agree2 Disagree1

04 Jan 2015 08:01:10
Sorry Ed002, but not all Liverpool fans act like that. It's just like saying "all English people don't brush their teeth" or "all african american men are criminals and in gangs".

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - And where did anyone suggest it was "all" Liverpool fans. Find someone to read it to you slowly.}

03 Jan 2015 16:06:28
Ed1 looking forward to next season so you believe that either or both Rossiter and Williams who came on v Boro could come into our first team squad and save us some money by looking for a Gerrard replacement. Also we have Henderson and Can who can develop into a regular in midfield. Surely. It's time to look within.

Believable5 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - I think we have to, we can't afford to buy the players we need, we have to develop them.}

Williams looks a good prospect, can tackle, strong good on the ball and sees a pass.

Agree2 Disagree1

Wow just posted that about Hendo etc!

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 15:47:03
i watched the interview with BR talking about stevie leaving and reading between the lines he said that because of his age stevie would not be playing as many games has he would like and i think that's the real reason he is leaving because where ever he goes he will play in the position he wants c-a-m and play as much as he wants and i don't think BR was willing to give him that, if we can see he is not a d-m then so can stevie and he knows he is not playing well there so i think he has asked to play further up the field and BR has said no, no matter how slow he becomes he will never lose a step in his brain and that gives him the edge over faster players, that's why the like of lampard and pirlo are still playing so well but its down to BR that stevie is leaving, i don't think its down to the money, i maybe wrong but doubt it after watching that interview, if you get to watch it think about it yourself after it, i will see if i'm right or wrong when he signs for the new team and see what his position is, maybe after the swansea game he realised the team can win without him, plus it must have been a kick in the teeth when he never played against real madrid, believe me when i say its down to BR and the way he is doing things to the club he is going to destry it, all our good young players are getting let go and our older players are leaving . so that agger and stevie, who do you all reckon will be the next top player to go, it would not suprise me if studge and sterling leave in the summer BR is that arrogant

Believable3 Unbelievable4

BR is full of crap.

BR was continuously slobbering about how he would keep Gerrard for years - and how he was/is capable of playing every minute of every game.

Now that Gerrad has decided to walk, BR has totally changed his tune.

I can't stand this charlatan. I've never seen an LFC manager lie and contradict himself so much.

BR's already destroyed Gerrard's career prematurely - to the point that Stevie is seen as an awful DM player who is jumping ship, now BR's going to try to spin this as if it's somehow partly his decision.

BR is truly an person. I can't stand the guy tbh. I love LFC too much to stand idly by and keep my mouth shut about it either!

Agree13 Disagree6

I'm afraid that's how I feel about Rodgers too

Agree4 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 17:07:16
ZinedineKilbane you are simply a blert.

Gerrard knew he was going a while back, as did Brendan.

Now, as Brendan sits in Stevie's house (which he moved into as a mutual agreement with both of them knowing the circumstances), he simply had no choice in the matter.

Out of curiosity, if we had lifted the league trophy, would you still blame the manager?

Remember one thing lad, regardless of us winning the league or not, this team would have performed exactly the same.

Stevie's injuries which plagued him in his early career have simply played it's toll on his body.

A good move for Stevie, a good move for our team, a good move for the manager (takes the added stress of him having to play the Captain to keep many fans happy) and a good move for us as fans.

Stop moaning and appreciate that another great is heading out of our club with his head held high.

I'm made up we won't have to sit back and listen to the obsessive songs we hear week in week out.

Beckham had to endure a similar thing and via Spain or wherever, it worked out for him.

Good luck Stevie and enjoy the sun and your freedom.

Agree5 Disagree8

Daveybootle, before you start calling people names wait for your manager to win something or do something right, last season it was easy for him because of siarez and studge, now it was not easy to replace surez well it was impsossible, but beside sanchez there was other top players out there we could have got with the suarez money, but he got balotelli, and BR is on the recruitment boad who sign players so he would have to give the go ahead to buy Mario so you can't say it was not his signing, all the rest of his signings have not worked out, they are not bad players its just the way they are getting played as in out of position or told their orders before they go out on the pitch, he gets us playing like last season were we win and score 4 goals and play really good, so this really good manager then changes the tactics back to the slow build up of earlier games were we played very poor and without getting penalities we would have got beat by the bottom team, so yea the manager is right and sttevie is wrong, look at the likes of pirlo, lampard, giggs, even scholes, they carried on playing into their late 30s and to a top standard but they were being played in their best position and not out of position, where as stevie is getting played out of position where he is needed to run all game to close down players, something the players i have mentioned never had to do, they were managed better, so when the manager actually does something good off his own back and wins something he is not that good is he

Agree3 Disagree0

That's ridiculous, davey. Your comments make little-to-no sense. I could swear that you're drunk or something!!

Nothing but platitudes and hypotheticals. Nothing in any way factual. If you're denying that BR said the things I said he did, then you're delusional tbh.

Nevermind that you seem glad to be rid of Gerrard too, so what's your problem?

In relation to your other comments: Last year was last year. This year is this year. Does this confuse you?? Does the concept that without Suarez to inspire the team, we are pretty rubbish confuse you too??

And yes, that is the only major change to the side, also don't forget the money spent on 3-4 strikers to compete with Sturridge (Borini, Lambert, Balotelli, Aspas)- all of whom are not deemed worthy of a place in our team! Instead BR would rather play players out of position!! Try to explain that rationally. These guys cost us millions.

Also - If we had won the league, of course the manager would deserve some praise - but likewise, If he royally f*****d-up the team the next year like a clueless self-contradictory, lying berk - I'd obviously not be happy.

Is that really so difficult to understand?

Also, if f I want to know 'who is living in who's house?' I'll ask you in future. But I really don't care tbh - doesn't change a thing I said or make you correct about anything.

It made you seem like a little star-struck scouser tbh. The type who probably reads Twitter religiously and who complains about fans that aren't mindless sheep.

As for the small-minded idea that a manager should play a player to 'keep the fans happy', that's pretty ridiculous - (unless you like your managers to have no spine). SG has been one of our worst players this year - it's hardly like Ruud Gullit dropping Shearer in his prime!

The ironic thing is that SG as an att mid is a great player. It's BR who has destroyed him, not me - and as you said yourself - you are happy to see Gso go have a go at him, will you?

Agree6 Disagree2

Sorry there - The last paragraph should say:

"The ironic thing is that SG as an att mid is a great player. It's BR who has destroyed him, not me -so go have a go at him, will you? - and as you said yourself - you are happy to see Gerrard go. 'Good for the fans' you said, wasn't it?" So chillax, you clearly have issues, man!

Agree4 Disagree2

03 Jan 2015 15:44:42
Hey eds.
If u could just giive an insight into the working of sir bob paisley.
have been very curious to know how he made us the force dat we were.
Thanx!nd keep up the good work!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - You cannot blame Bob Paisley for the force that Liverpool are now.}

03 Jan 2015 14:42:51
It will be next February'. Busy 2015 ahead

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Not any February.}

03 Jan 2015 14:41:58
Edd002 which mls team do you see gerrard heading to? Brother lives in new York and I might take the son over during February to visit and watch gerrard in his new team.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - He will have options but you won't be seeing him in February in NY.}

03 Jan 2015 15:14:58
So folks do we all think we will have him comeback during the MLS break next winter?

Think it's a shoe in that he will do a Robbie Keane on it.

Believable0 Unbelievable6

I see no point, I think it would be detrimental to the players here and their development, unless we are top of the league and he could do enough sub appearances to get a medal.

Agree4 Disagree1

Please God no!!

Agree1 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 14:58:00
with the way BR is treating the younger players who we know are very good for their age and have the ptential to make it, i have been thinking when stevie, carra and michael owne came through what would have happend to them if BR was in charge, i think they would not have got their chance and may as well have been sokd or just let go and look how they turned out, the same can happen with suso and ilori and all the other who are getting no chance with BR in charge, we would not have won the things we have without stevie and carra, the knock on effect of them coming through has been to our benefit, the same can happen with keeping the players BR is trying to get rid of and not giving a chance to, we all know they have the talent and jordan ibe has proven BR is wrong in getting rid of these young players who the club have invested in a lot of money, as some one said about shaqari and ibe being the same type of player, the only difference to me is that shaqari has been given the chance to show what he can do at a top club, if ibe had been given a chance with us then he would have gone down the same road has sterling and been a star for us by now, the same goes for suso, he has been with us and knows the england game so he knows what to exoect in games and to be honest he has has some very good games for us when he has played, i'm still waiting for texaria to get a few games, but it does not matterr with BR or the owners because they are not big names so they don't get a chance, as the comparison between shaqari and ibe has been said, one is a big know name the other is not, so the owners would rather pay out £14 mill for a player that we have a younger version of, its the only reason i can think of why we would buy him, after watching ibe play for us, i would rather see ibe given a run of games, imagine ibe and sterling linking up they know each others games and they both are very quick they would rip teams apart and the other team we play would have to double up on them leaving space for others to go in and score, the signing of balotelli should be a lesson for all at the club who was involved in his signing for me he was never going to work, he is not the right type of persom or player our club goes for even if he got games and started scoring it would not last for long, i just want the club to spend money on a wuality top goal keeper then use the kids with the potential that will move our club forward because they know what our club is all aboutand the way we play

Believable6 Unbelievable2

I agree, use Ibe next season and spend 14 mil on a keeper.

Agree2 Disagree1

03 Jan 2015 15:33:07
£14m? Any reason why that amount or is it just yor favourite number?

Agree2 Disagree6

14 mil because that's the supposed fee of shaquiri. My point being we need a keeper desperately and as we've witnessed it's a position we should not skimp on.

Agree3 Disagree1

Puzzled red, you seem a bit puzzled about the price its just that I've seen 15 million euros being mentioned its not agreed so i put that amount, i'm sorry if that's the only comment you have to make about my post, you name suits you well, because your post puzzled me with no point you make

Agree2 Disagree0

Stevie and Owen were exceptional talents, Carra less so but what he lacked in ability he made up for in effort. If today's young players are good enough they will get a chance, like Raheem has done. Jordan's loan at Derby has been an essential part of his development, he is held in high regard by BR and will get his chance.

Agree2 Disagree0

They will get one chance, but will they get a second? At least that's what I would be wondering if I were Jones or Teixeira.

Agree1 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015
We have posted a new article entitled, Steven Gerrard: Why Liverpool Will Miss The Man But Not The Player

Believable2 Unbelievable1

Eds, I think it is the right time for Stevie to move on, but I just wanted to ask, was SG offered a player/coach role as i've seen reported in some of the Press?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - not that I am aware of, no. I was told he was offered a role with a reduced playing time, but no one mentioned coaching. I don't believe he has the badges anyway yet does he? I certainly don't remember him getting them, but my memory is not that good.}

Good article.

Agree0 Disagree0

Thanks Ed001 for the quick reply. I certainly didn't think he had completed all the required things to obtain the badges. I guess, the Press are looking for anything and everything to add to the departure story of SG.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - it certainly seems that way.}

Great read. Very much how I feel.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 13:48:51
Hi eds
I was wondering whether gerrard could be replaced by somebody .Rossiter looks good however he is very young and for the future . What about Fabian Delph or even Radja Nainngolan?

Believable1 Unbelievable3

{Ed001's Note - Delph? What is it with the talk of him? Inconsistent thug.}

03 Jan 2015 14:10:33
I'll admit that I haven't seen a lot of Delph, but from what I have seen, he looks like a high energy player who's sort of okay at everything but doesn't seem to excel any one thing. Hendo and Can are the same style of player, but are better technically and are both younger.

If that's the sort of player we're looking for to replace Gerrard, then we don't need to sign anyone. We should instead concentrate on signing someone to compliment Hendo and Can's style. Morgan Schneiderlin would be ideal, but will likely cost money we don't have.

Agree2 Disagree2

I really do not see the need to replace Gerrard with a similar player. If the club can move Allen on as well, then Schneiderlin would be perfect for our team with Rossiter being promoted to the first team squad. Delph is plain average and Nainngolan would command an unreasonably high fee considering he is in very good form and does not want to leave Roma in the first place.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 17:05:18
Rossiter does not have as much potential as gerrard did at that age. Sorry man.

Agree1 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 13:29:02
Probably going to get shot down for saying this but I keep reading gerrard won us champions league but I that does the mighty hamman injustice he changed the game in are favour gerrard scored and rallied the troops but hamman made the difference how I'd love to remember I'm 26 have hypia and henchoz at the back with gerrard hamman in midfirld

Believable4 Unbelievable1

The Kaiser changed the game in our favour, we were being run through at will by Milan as Gerrard didn't have the discipline to play the position required, Hamann allowed the others to play by tackling and doing the simple things brilliantly, Gerrard played a huge part getting us back in the game, but Hamann changed it in our favour. Plus he (Hamann) took a pen with a broken foot.

Agree1 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - personally I think everyone played their part. Carra's firing up of the players and pushing them forward was just as vital too. Alonso getting the rebound etc. They all played their part. It is wrong that certain individuals have been given all the glory for a team performance.}

Agree with both east anglia and ED01, and also with Mr Dennis for a change.

Agree0 Disagree0

We were getting mullered til the kaiser came on but there were so many little things that added to the result, the point blank save by dudek, smicer's wonderful long range daisy cutter, carra fighting cramp, Traore having the game of his life. What a night.

Agree4 Disagree0

Agree with Mr Dennis again, something is not right!

Agree2 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 13:07:03
After watching Ibe this season. A tricky, stocky and quick winger.

Is this not just a younger version of Shaqiri? I have not seen too much of him to judge this but maybe others can correct me if I am wrong?

Believable4 Unbelievable0

You're right the two players are very very similar apart from they play on opposite sides but their style is very similar

Agree1 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 13:45:36
But one of them is a young experienced international and at 15m Euro (if true) then its a very decent deal . many of you wanted him signed in the last summer window.
I care little if we signed him or not, to me he will be another risk just like Balo

Agree1 Disagree3

03 Jan 2015 13:57:29
We have many young players with plenty of potential, but for some reason rather than manage them properly and use them, BR wants to hinder their progress by not giving them a chance. It really worries me. Suso, Texiera, Ibe, Ojo, Sinclair and Rossiter all have potential, it really concerns me that we will end up letting them all go.

Agree4 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 12:55:21
Had a big convo about Gerrard last night which led onto Liverpool as a club over the last 25 yrs.
I think next season equals the same amount of time for Liverpool having not won the league as Man Utd had to wait before they won it in 1991?(not 100% but its close)

Since 1990 we have been involved in a title race 4 times.
Under Rafa, Evans, Houllier and Rodgers.
4 times in 25 years is an awful record and I would like some comments as to why people think this has come about?
Even the title races under Evans and Houllier, we were never really in a position to actually win the league.
Only Rafa and Rodgers can claim to have had it in their own hands and then lost the league.
That makes 2 attempts in 25 yrs really.
How bad is that record?
I would really appreciate some reasons why we have a record like that?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Simple really, we have spent a lot of money on the wrong players.

Agree7 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 13:30:53
I was thinking that I could spend hours talking about what each manager did wrong, but actually 18and5 has summed it up quite well.

I would say that sometimes the management was constricted in who they could sign which contributed to that.

Agree1 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 13:40:25
We have spent a lot of money on average players :-)

Plus the teams above us have always spent more on fewer players of better quality :-)

Agree2 Disagree1

03 Jan 2015 13:42:25
We've never had a plan. Sold world class players and bought terribly also

Agree1 Disagree0

We come close and then seem to shoot ourselves in the foot
The time under Rafa we did not invest the following season in order to, push on
This season we have lost world class striker and re-built the whole squad.

However, I keep hearing football is different now to the 80's
It's not - it's fans expectations of immediate success asa result of the society we live in that has changed

Look at Fergie's record - United came 2nd i think and then 11th the following season whilst he built his side. Then came high up and dipped again - and since his first 4years in charge he never finished outside the top 3!

Patience and a lack of knee-jerk reaction is the key to successful long-term development of a football club -especially one that isn't backed by a money-bags owner.

I believe some of the buys we have made set us up long term, bit like when I was sticking up for Henderson when he signed and stated he would be a future captain.

Once this season is out of the way I think we will challenge again.

Agree2 Disagree1

It is the money that has come into the game that has changed football. You spend £50 million you don't get 3 seasons to get it right. This is the reality of todays game.

Agree1 Disagree0

Souness. I don't think we ever recovered from his dismantling of a good squad and replacing them with fairly average thugs.

Agree0 Disagree2

Think AggerDo has hit the nail on the head - when we've been close we've failed to strengthen the following season and in fact have often weakened ourselves. Inability to keep quality players has been the biggest issue as its always meant that we have never had the quality in depth to win it. Rafa is the perfect example of this - if we could have kept that team together who finished 2nd and added say 2 more quality signings we would have been close. We never seem to have enough quality and, more worryingly, we seem really bad at replacing the quality we lose.

To summarise we simply are not run, as a club, in a very good way compared to others.

Agree0 Disagree0

Thanks for the comments.
My summary is that something is not right off the pitch for this abysmal record to have continued for so long.
Hopefully, FSG are understanding why we have failed for so long in winning the league despite being in the top 6 for pretty much the whole 25 odd years.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 12:29:00
To all those who doubt (or will not for some reason admit) how good Gerrard has been, Mr Dennis in particular just take a look at the SKY career highlights and tell me that Molby, Whelan or Mc Mahon was better, you are having a laugh, and as I said yesterday I loved all 3 of them lads but come on let's have it right here Gerrard deserves to be mentioned in the top few (1, 2, 3, 5, 10) LFC players of all time, none of the 3 other lads do. If anyone can show me a red who thinks Gerrard is not in the top 10 LFC players of all time I will show you a manc.

Believable2 Unbelievable1

03 Jan 2015 13:33:03
18and5 , I appreciate your insight and think you have more knowledge football and LFC than the average poster on here, so a question, why did it go wrong this year? I know the transfer window was a shamble, but why was that ? I am sure a little study of the pl history would've have told the board and those concerned they needed to replace Suarez like for like ??

Agree0 Disagree0

You sum your point up with a HIGHLIGHTS real which is what it is, highlights.

I saw McMahon, Whelan, Molby and Souness in the flesh(and to qualify the statement, I've also seen Gerrard pretty much all of his time at Anfield), they were consistant and very rarely bettered, Gerrard didn't have that ability to boss a midfield the same way that they could, don't get me wrong he had some fabulous moments, but some of the gushing hyperbole about Gerrard is just wrong. A great yes, but greatest? No way.

I would just draw your attention to the first half of the European cup final in 2005 when he played centre midfield along side Alonso, he was awful that first half and got bypassed, I can guarantee you that none of the four I mentioned would have been so easily brushed aside, it was only when he was pushed to the right and told to just attack that he had any impact.

In terms of my top ten ever it's these guys and yes he doesn't make it in there, but that's simply my own honest opinion.
Hansen - greatest centre half we have ever had
Souness - a beast of a midfielder, could tackle, shoot and dominate like no other player
Rush - best striker we've ever had, no one has scored as many as him and it will be a long time before his record is broken
Dalglish - cleverest footballer I've seen, always thinking ten yards ahead of everyone else
Callaghan - 800+ appearances, switched positions very successfully in his later years
Emlyn Hughes - would run his heart out for the club, but also a superb defender
Kevin Keegan - a player who was ahead of his time in terms of skill and finishing, also was prepared to put a shift in too.
Alan Kennedy - the original modern day fullback, could attack and defend brilliantly, scored in two European cup finals.
Ray Clemence - best keeper we've ever had, immense concentration levels and good at all aspects of keeping, no weaknesses
John Barnes - on his day, unplayable a true genius with the ball at his feet

And I've missed out Fowler, Beardsley, Lawrenson, Carragher, Gerrard, Neal, Thompson, Whelan, Molby, Grobelaar to name a few.

Again, am grateful for the memories from Gerrard, but it's the right time for him to leave, although really it's some that should have happened a few years earlier and certainly won't be getting dewy eyed about something that is essentially a good decision for all concerned.

Agree5 Disagree1

Roy, I think you have hit the nail on the head, a like for like (well as close as possible) replacement for Suarez would surely have give us a chance to carry on where we left off last season playing the system that almost got us the league and in my opinion we should have went for quality not quantity. Did we really need Markovic and Lallana when other positions could have been addressed, did we need Manqillo on a strange loan which means if he performs well enough for us to want to keep him Athletico can simply take him back (I think that's correct anyway) and say thanks for the help and game time. Also Balotelli has been a disaster but to be honest I was quite ok with us signing him, I know he has his problems and I know he has never been prolific but I was hoping he would come here and step up a level, i was looking back at how he performed and scored against England which I thought showed he could be a success, up to now I was badly wrong.

Agree0 Disagree0

Mr Dennis, I too watched all the careers of the players you mention and Gerrard too, home and away for about ten years throughout the 80's and at home since 1971 upto present day.

I agree with your comments on almost all the players and I won't split hairs over a few comments because every single player you mention I love to bits, howewer to me Steven Gerrard gets in our top ten every day of the week.
By the way Souness, what a player.

And just to clarify I too think it is a good time for Gerrard to go, I just think we will only really realise what a player he has been when he has gone.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 11:18:59
hello ed, please please, can you clear it for me, 2 month ago gerrard said that he want to stay and its up to liverpool, than the offer came, so what's happend than? the offer wasnt good? did he pushed out? did liverpool realy didn't want him that much ?
thank you ed !

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - it was a combination. He was offered reduced wages, for reduced playing time over a short period. He wanted a longer contract, more money and didn't want to have his playing time limited. There was no common ground so he is leaving. Right decision for me.}

03 Jan 2015 13:47:09
A players time has to come to an end, the club has to move on and will do. Why pay a fortune on wages for a player who will just decline as time goes on (SG will always be a lengend for our club). I think it's great that he is going to get one more massive pay day and the chance to prolong his career a few more years by playing less than in the PL.

I reckon he would have taken a pay cut if we were competing like last year, but clearly we are no closer than we were a few years ago.

Agree0 Disagree0

How could he dare ask for more money? He knows the club is in debt, he is getting older and needs to play less to allow younger members the chance. easy to forget your roots. I love Stevie and what he has done for the club on the playing front but he should take a leave from king Kenny that the club's is always bigger.

Baz

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 11:17:34
Right lads our squad is very very young lucky or young players have decent experience but with Gerrard Johnson and possibly Lucas and/or Toure leaving that will leave a huge gap in the dressing room on the pitch of experienced players will this affect our transfer activity ??

Believable0 Unbelievable0

03 Jan 2015 11:07:30
What would people think of Defoe coming to Lfc this month us he is old but is better suited to our pay then some players at the club and can finish

Believable0 Unbelievable1

I suggested it many transfer windows ago and was roundly criticised on here by posters and Eds alike
Do I think we should sign him now?
Actually not a bad call, if it's because the owners don't want to give a manager who they are going to replace any more money then a short term deal is probably the best we can hope for

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - he wasn't good enough for Spurs, he isn't good enough for us.}

I agree he isn't any more Ed and he's not a player I would now sign however if we assume there will be next to no money spent in January wouldn't you take him instead of having no-one?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - no, I would rather take a chance on a youngster who might have a surprise element to his game. You never know, he might just step up and turn out to be good enough, whereas we already know Defoe isn't and never has been.}

I would rather a young gun myself but I don't see that happening for some reason

Agree0 Disagree0

But we don't have a striker young or otherwise bar Sturridge at the club who will come close to being as good a finisher as Defoe
Maybe Yesil but I'm constantly told his injuries have ruined him

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 10:58:51
If we sign Shaquiri this will be yet another example of the clubs shocking transfer business.

Yes, he is a good (but inconsistent) player. Yes, €15m is a good price. But why?

We already have Lallana, Sterling, Coutinho, Ibe, Ojo, Origi, Markovic, Assaidi, Luis Alberto, Suso, Texeira, Brannagan and Wilson. That is 13 players all capable of playing either attacking midfield or out wide, all of whom will be looking/ready for first team football next season in some capacity.

That is not €15m well spent. That is €15m burned that could've been used to sign a keeper, a holding midfielder or a striker.

Virtually the only position our squad isn't weak/depleted in and we are apparently looking to add to it!

You only really need about 4 or 5 of these players in your squad. Take away the Wilson, Ojo and Brannagan as they're kids anyway and with Shaquiri you still have 11 players there who need regular game time. So at least 6 of them need to be leaving us to make this transfer worthwhile. Transfers for the sake of transfers.

Believable12 Unbelievable3

I agree with this Adam.
The only money I would like to see spent is on a keeper.
I would like to see both Origi and Ibe return from loan if possible (I would pay a small fee to Lille as well to allow the move).
That would be like signing 2 new players and add that to Sturridge not being far from returning would be enough in my opinion.
Maybe sell a couple as well.
Enrique, Skrtel would be my first two out the door.
There is an argument out there that by recalling Ibe and Origi we are putting too much pressure on them too early.
My argument is that both players fit our style of play perfectly.
That is what we need.
Players who are comfortable playing our system.

Agree6 Disagree2

I think you are right EMS. why does Brendan want shaqiri when we already have an abundance of midfielders/wingers at our disposal. Our transfer committee should concentrate on a special goalkeeper and only if possible a decent striker. Even then I still think we are overspending and digging a bigger hole for orselves when it comes to FFP. The only way I can see this happening is if we were to sell some of our average but still worth something players. Brendan really has messed us up big time and not been cute enough in the transfer market. The sooner as the de boer twins arrive the better if you ask me. Pure football intelligence as players and probably the same as coaches/managers . YNWA.

Agree3 Disagree1

If the owners have already started looking for a new manager, I don´t think they would hand BR money to buy players that fit into his tactics. If the commitee were to buy a player for Rodgers, then I´m quite sure the player will be no more than a bench player until post BR.

Instead of buying players in this transfer window, they should make sure that youth players such as sterling, Ibe and Flannagan gets a new contract. Also find a spin doctor for BR.

Agree0 Disagree0

You mention a striker but 4 of those could play as a striker too which to me shows you know the importance of having a few ready made players which we have very few of with most of our 1st 11 and subs are 3-7 years off their peak. Obviously ojo and Wilson are closer to 10 years from their peak it's widely accepted that players hit their peak at 27ish. Why can't we sign a few players who are maybe 1 or 2 years away from their peak for a change

Agree1 Disagree0

That's actually a very good point.

Agree0 Disagree0

I think we signed markovic instead and it's old rumours recycled

Agree0 Disagree0

I have a bad feeling the club is already preparing for life after Sterling. The lad has still not signed a new contract, and i'm afraid his financial demands may well exceed what the club is able to offer him. If the club really wants Shaqiri, why not tell Bayern to bid for Sterling plus another 25-30 million in cash since Bayern are rumored to be one of the interested parties in Sterling? I would take cash plus Shaqiri for Sterling if he wants out.

Agree0 Disagree1

As shop windows go Adam i think a high percentage of posters on here may like to see the following line up versus the wombles.

Mignolet

Rodgers Skrtel Achterberg Enrique

Lucas

Marsh Allen

Pascoe

Balotelli Borini

Agree2 Disagree0

You can't tell Bayern to bid for Sterling and you can't make Sterling go if he doesn't want to.

Agree3 Disagree0

Irish Rover, Bayern will be making a shortlist of candidates who could replace Ribery and Robben in the long term and i would be really surprised if Sterling was not on that list. Sooner rather than later, Sterling is going to move to one of the elite clubs if he keeps improving so rapidly. So why not just notify Bayern about a potential swap deal? They will need to replace Shaqiri too so a swap deal makes a lot of sense. We also have Ibe coming back from loan who will be as good as Sterling(hopefully) so its a win-win situation for all parties.

Agree1 Disagree1

03 Jan 2015 13:59:24
By your logic Buzzer , why should LFC offer the swap deal. If you are that optimistic about Sterling's progress, then surely he will be worth a lot more that 15m Euro in a year or 2. Wont you rather keep him, get the best of him, then sell him in a couple of seasons for a lot more

Agree0 Disagree0

Possible Indian Buzzer, but Sterling would still want to go there.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sterling would cost £30m plus now it's almost certain that will continue to increase

Agree0 Disagree0

It's not that simple. If sterling is turning down 80k+ a week to stay why would bayern pay him more to replace a sub? Plus pay another 25 mil in a swap deal!? Sterling is a good prospect but if I had 40 mil burning a hole in my back pocket there would be dozens of better ways to spend it. English players are over inflated price wise- foreign clubs do not need to pay over the odds as a general rule as they don't help meet CL restrictions on home grown players. Bayern could just offer shaquiri to Dortmund and 10 mil and probably get Reus in return.

Agree0 Disagree0

Roy, Sterling has not signed a new contract with the club. What if he continues to refuse a new deal and leaves on a free in a couple of seasons? If Bayern want him (im sure he will be an option for them to replace Ribery), then let him go. 30 million plus Shaqiri is a reasonably good fee for a player who is stalling on a new contract, considering the player coming the other way is also extremely talented and high profile.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I don't get this desire to sign Shaqiri. Talent wasted will be all he will be remembered for when he retires. His attitude sucks and he would be a terrible signing.}

Aside from the rest I mentioned if sterling were to be sold we have a replacement in Ibe and the cash could be better used elsewhere in the squad.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree ed001 very overrated, if we really need another winger i would go for depay from psv much better player.
But if we have money to spend i would buy keeper+ we will need to bring in a defensive midfielder once gerrard leaves.
Lucas is not in BR long term plans and i can't see allen stepping up.
Malta

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 10:44:51
There are eyes shrouded by the mists of time.
Ok, so Stevie has had a hard time off some fans, in some quarters, in the past 3 or 4 seasons.
But he's 34 for gods sake.
Cast your minds back, did age and injury not catch up with past legends ?

Kenny was 27 when he joined. He missed matches by 84 on. The double year, I think he hardly played before the Xmas of that season. And he virtually never kicked a ball in anger after 86. So, as good as he was, Liverpool did well to get 9 years of excellence from him.

Johnny Barnes was the barn-storming winger we all remember for 3 seasons before injury forced him to completely change his game. Still brilliant but nothing like he was.

By 88 on, there was a collective drawing of breath from all Liverpool fans every time a high ball was lobbed into the Liverpool penalty area with the goalie and centre backs. It was panic stations, but you don't see that on the highlights videos anymore.

All the great players faltered as they got older. How could they not, it happens to everyone ?
But they never got shredded on social media every week, so we remember the good times they bestowed on us.

Steve Gerrard has given 17 years, and I'll say that again so that you can take it in, 17 !
It's momentous.
Yes fitness, diet, recovery techniques have leapt forward. But the player had everything - athleticism, aggression, could tackle, heading ability, set pieces, skill, technique, shoot from anywhere.
He should be remembered as a great.
But, if moaning is your thing, remember back or ask your dad, about the latter years of all the other greats.

Believable11 Unbelievable0

You're missing everyones point mate. Nobodys denying Gerrard Is a legend or one of our best ever players. People are just saying that it's the right time for him to go and that it won't affect our team as badly as others are making out.

When all the legends you have mentioned called it time, I'm sure nobody was begging them to stay to collect a massive wage for costing us points ir sitting on the bench.

Agree2 Disagree0

The problem is, Gerrard has been our best player and fan favourite for so long that people can't let go and still think Gerrard is the same player. Most people, includi g yourself have recognised his decline. Shankley and Paisley wouldn't have even harboured Gerrard for as long as we have. He'd have been gone in 2011/12 when it became obvious he wasn't as good as he once was so that a new crop of talent could come through.

I think that we as a club are so insecure that we don't want to let go of the past for fear there is nothing in the future.

Agree2 Disagree0

Agree with all your post Juicer, we all know time has caught up with Gerrard but its the people who for some reason play down how good/important he has been for the club and compare some players from the past and current teams to him who in truth can't hold a candle to him.
I am thankful that we have had him in out team rather than having to play against him for all these years.

Agree1 Disagree0

On field, good decision to let him go
Off field, terrible, he could have stayed bled in new youngsters, offered a helping hand to newbies and become an inspirational figure to rally the players.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - Gerrard didn't want that mate. He wanted to make his presence felt on the field, which he can do in a slower league.}

Spot on again EMS

Agree0 Disagree0

Shankly and Paisley wouldn't have had to hold onto Gerrard. We were winners back then. A team full of winners all over the pitch. Loosing a good player was usually replaced by a better one. Completely different to now. Adam you say the club is insecure of the past yet you bring up managers from 40 years ago that have no relevance with todays game.

Agree4 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 10:00:10
What's the latest on Sterling's contract?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - There is no "latest".}

03 Jan 2015 09:30:32
Morning Ed

The fact we are after Shaqiri, is this based on us shifting either Balo or Borini or not linked at all please?

Believable1 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - If Liverpool were to buy Shaqiri it would be as a replacement for someone like Coutinho, Lallana, Markovic or Sterling.}

Not sure why Shaqiri would want to join LFC to sit on the bench.

Agree0 Disagree0

Well it don't look like any if those 4 are leaving does it mate? A strange one then unless there is no truth in it.

Agree1 Disagree0

Well who out of that 4 is likely to go Ed? Strange one as i don't see any of them leaving?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - I don't see any leaving in January.}

03 Jan 2015 08:48:59
Just a quick one to let you know your post is on the others page Sandon. We are trying to keep the banter page a bit more light hearted, and I have a feeling that post might not end up being light hearted!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Thanks ed001 really appreciate it. its going to be an interesting one! Will be refreshing the page every minute!

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 10:48:34
Really think that page needs a new name the other page sounds real boring. The blow off room though on second thought it sounds more like an adult site

Agree2 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 08:35:29
Just seen that Jordan Ibe's contract expires end of the season. Surely we need to renew it as soon as possible?

Believable12 Unbelievable0

03 Jan 2015 08:11:30
Brendans Advocate got to ask what did Stevie do that was so bad?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

03 Jan 2015 05:19:46
I posted at the end of last season when people were discussing whether SG was the best ever. I said then that for me it was Dalglish, but SG was running a close second. I stand by that but it might just be a generational thing.
Having said that, on the pitch he has been a legend and deserves to be spoken about with the same respect given to Dagger et al. I am really disappointed to see posts saying good riddance, or what a load of garbage? I thought we as fans were better than that!
I have to agree though, his performances this season have not been to standard and constantly playing him has held us back as a team. Age has caught up with him and playing him out of position (and 3-4 other players every game) has hurt us. Hopefully SG will be used as an impact player from the bench in an AM role for the rest of the season, and started in a few cup games where experience is needed. I think Jordan Henderson will make a great captain and deserves to be playing back in his natural CM role. We look so much more comfortable with him in there and Lucas sat in front of the defence. All in all I wish Stevie the best of luck for the future and thanks for giving us your best years and all the fantastic highs. I for one will never forget him lifting the European cup in Istanbul. Great memories!

Believable10 Unbelievable0

03 Jan 2015 05:01:39
Can any of the ed's enlighten us on the circumstances of Gerrard's departure. Was he offered a new contract by the club or not? Personally i'm nonplussed by his departure. At worst we see an icon of the club leave and we become a little less attractive to other players knowing they won't be playing alongside Gerrard. At best his void will be filled with someone who merits the place i.e Can. Steven Gerard great player, but one of the most narcissistic human beings I've ever had the displeasure of meeting. Gerrard makes Rio Ferdinand look like an honorable chap.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - he was offered one but wanted more money.}

Thanks ed's 001. So Carraghers piece in the Daily Fail questioning why the club didn't do more to keep him is just a load of tosh then. I thought so. I'm warming to this FSG mob, no one is going to hold the club to ransom. We lost great players in the past and yet we still managed to be successfull and win silverware. The king is dead long live the CAN!!!

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - Carra is just trying to make a living and give his mate some backing. He only gets to see the Gerrard side of the story, so his viewpoint is skewed by that. They offered him a very high wage, but not as much as he is on now, without the clause previously demanded by him of being the highest paid player at the club. He was willing to accept that clause going, and also to take a pay cut, but nothing like what the club felt he should accept, nor could they agree on the length of the contract either. He wanted a longer term than the club were willing to consider. All in all it is best to part now, while he is remembered for what he was, and he can go and add a couple of league titles to his collection.}

Ed001, do still see Carra managing a football team someday? He can do a bloody good job at the championship level.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - hard to say mate, it seems unlikely he will get the chance now he has chosen punditry.}

Do you see him doing a Lampard Ed001?
Hapy New year as well fella!!

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - god no. I really don't think Gerrard would want to do that at all. I expect him to go to NY Red Bulls (I think it was them that secured his rights before he even said he was considering Liverpool so have first option) or LA Galaxy and go over there properly.}

Carra has stated time and again he never wants to manage

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jan 2015 04:52:03
hello eds.

1.who was responsible for tactical changes under the tenure of rafa benitez?

2. it is sad that we won't have Gerrard next season, what is u r opinion on how Liverpool should proceed for next season.

3. and does the present crop of players has potential inspire the club to great heights?

thanks.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - 1. Depends. Rafa chose the tactics, but sometimes he made changes because of the input from his fitness coaches.
2. Get a proper DM and stop messing about forcing players with no defensive nous to play there.
3. With the right leadership, yes.}

03 Jan 2015 02:08:39
Heard Leicester are in for Schwarzer. I would take him on a short term deal. Better than migs and jones in my opinion. Will buy us time until the long term choice is available.

Believable2 Unbelievable1

02 Jan 2015 23:52:34
Funny but I can't recall too many complaints about Stevie last season whilst we were flying. truth is he hasn't played well but who has this season.He isn't the player he once was but I'm sorry but if there are many better in our current midfield I've missed them. most aren't fit to lace his boots even now and he's still the player most likely to make things happen.
Let's just remember the many fabulous moments capt fantastic has given our club over the years and good luck to him.who cares where he fits into the top 10 !

Believable8 Unbelievable1

But he isn't a defensive midfielder, his age has caught up with him and he doesn't merit an automatic start. Gerrard at 25 was great Gerrard at 35 has been poor except in flashes.

Agree0 Disagree0

I always had him following the path lothar matthaus of Germany took, namely moving to a sweeper roll. How ironic now that we could move to play such a system that he calls time on his Liverpool career. I would love to see it tried out before the season end, as he and matthaus were very similar in their approach and ability.

I know it won't happen now, as BR is a bit of a person, but it didn't do matthaus any harm in fact he went on to play another 5 years and two world cups in that position.

Never mind, good luck SG in everything you do. You've deserved the option to choose and will go with the blessing of all no doubt. hopefully

Agree6 Disagree0

We were flying because we had Suarez and Sturridge outscoring most teams, not because of Gerrard.

He played a part yes, but we would probably still be outscoring teams if we had the both of them without Gerrard.

Look i'm a big Gerrard fan, grew up watching him getting into our team. But he is no longer the same person, and shouldev been used like Lampard. Lampard is still scoring because the manager knows his qualities, when and how to use em. Lampard was not put as a defensive mid because he was getting old.

Agree5 Disagree0

There was plenty of people moaning about him last year actually.
Changing his position got about 10 good performances from him though, but he got found out in the end, unfortunately.

Agree4 Disagree1

Every team in the league now knows that when gerrard plays everything goes through him. They put a man on him and we lose the game. Lucas moves the ball on quicker, keeps us fluid and stays in position. We conceded an awful lot of goals with SG in the DM role.

Agree1 Disagree1

03 Jan 2015 09:43:08
Found out for what.?.still being easily our best midfield player despite the turning circle of the titanic. I agree with others that the club is more important and shouldn't be held to ransom. but honestly believe SG still has plenty to offer when used correctly.Mikey1985. there are some supporters on here who would twist on 21!!!

Agree3 Disagree0

You can't have seen any of my posts then lol.

Agree0 Disagree1

Swishcleaner.
I think its called the superman effect.
We have a player who has bailed the team out for so long that it has become a team habit to rely on Gerrard when the shi. hits the fan.
The difference between the Swansea game without Gerrard and the game against Leicester was stark.
When Gerrard is not playing everyone else plays differently.
The other players assume responsibilities that they don't when he is playing.
That is a consequence of the "superman" effect.
It has everything to do with how other players play around Gerrard when he is in the team.
Having Superman in your team is great but having Clark Kent in your team isn't so great.
That in my opinion is what has happened.
I just hope if he does go and play in a competitive league to win a couple of titles that he does not choose the premiership.
My other issue with this announcement is that it has offered the players an excuse for things not working out in the 2nd half of the season.
I think Gerrard will play really well now and the pressure is off but I don't know whether his team mates see it that way.
Players don't need much to look for an excuse as to why they are not performing.
Gerrard's announcement offers up a great excuse now.
Still gutted he is leaving though.

Agree2 Disagree0

I agree to some extent Jonnybarnes but it's also the fact that Brendan wants them to play through him which is predictable for teams to counter. Instead of taking the best option it often goes back to Gerrard which slows play up. He demands the ball and you can't argue with the Captain. I would have liked to him to have stayed another year albeit as an impact player.

Agree0 Disagree0

Stan theman

There weren't any complaints about stevie, cus we were playing a different style of football. He allowed us to peg back defenses. as they'd play deeper due to SaSaS pace, and Gerrards constant over the top balls. Go watch some of last years football again. As it stand we are playing just Sterling up there, who hasn't a clue how to play the long striker role, and we've switched to a more posession rather than pressing and counter style of play. Stevies ball playing talents, are thus wasted on the team this year.

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent