Liverpool Banter Archive December 19 2017

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

19 Dec 2017 20:59:08
Some good points on here the last week or so. I'd constantly called for Sturridge to go in the summer but got slated time and time again. I loved studge when he was at his best but I don't see other top clubs indulging in has Beens or maybes they get rid and are ruthless.

The fact that the Opinion in Moreno has completely changes can surely not be down to his performances! Yes he has done better but he has also been a liability in manyu games and he constantly distorts the shape of the team. Robertson is by far a better option. Better defensively, more composed, better delivery and not as hot headed.

The big issues remain in goal and at the back with Matip injury prone and Klavan and Lovren although decent back up centre half's playing far too much! We need 2 new centre backs badly maybe one we great experience who can help Gomez into the role eventually and someone reaching their prime. Easier said than done.

In goal Karius, bar dawdling on the ball v Arsenal has been improved and Mignolet the same old inconsistent Mignolet.

On a bright note the emergence of Gomez and TAA has been a huge bonus and will likely save us a fortune. Both have been very impressive and have many years in a red shirt ahead.

Centre mid has also become a concern, hendo who I rate Highly just hasn't been at his level, Wini needs to take less touches, move the ball qucikly and drove forward more. Milner and Can are good squad players. Really we need 2 new centre miss, Keita is one, who the other?

As for Coutinho, he has been a great signing and I enjoy seeing the club buy good players, get good service and sell them for millions more . Beats the old days of paying big money for players who eventually gave poor service and were sold for a reduced price.

Lessons haven't been learned since Klopp arrived in holding onto leads. We continue to drop points and lose or draw games after going ahead. Some has been unlucky but there is a consistent theme that needs to be rectified. Get that right and we will be well in the mix .

YWNA.

Believable3 Unbelievable11

19 Dec 2017 21:54:48
Personally I’d say moreno is ahead of Robertson. He offers more going forward plus Robbo hasn’t be tested defensively yet. However by the end of the season I believe Robbo will be our number 1 left back. Definitely agree we need a CB maybe just one and give Gomez a shot then sign a RB pereira? I’ve been impressed with Ox so he could be the other cm provided we push Woodburn, Wilson or ojo on next season. I think we’ll have a much more solid squad going into next season I just hope we can kick on a challenge for trophies.


19 Dec 2017 23:57:03
I find it odd. This Moreno is better going forward. He and Robertson have similar assist stats if I am right? With moreno playing more games. And in a team that more often than not dominated games, and with far superior players than no disrespect but Robertson had at Hull city. Moreno has improved this season and huge respect to him. But I for 1 don't see much difference in the pair off them, Robertson edges it in defensive side in my opinion.


20 Dec 2017 01:39:31
Regardless who is better, isn't it important we have depth at this position that has been a problem for years? Moreno goes down and we are fortunate to have an actual left back in his place. With all the comparisons between the two, we will see how Andy makes out this Friday against a top 6 team before we start comparing him to Moreno.


20 Dec 2017 09:50:39
Just picking up on that comment about 'has-beens. Firstly it's an increadibly disrespectful way to talk about a professional who is still doing his best for a cause you want to succeed. And secondly whilst Arsenal still play Walcott and Welbeck, United still keep Carrick who is 35 years old with a heart problem in contention, Chelsea still give minutes to the increasingly unreliable Cahill, Spurs buying Fernando Llorente in the summer, I think your assessment of what other clubs do with players as soon as they pass their peak ability levels is pretty wildly inaccurate. I'm not saying that we should keep every single player indefinitely, but it wouldn't kill us to discuss our desire for them to move on with a little more respect would it?


20 Dec 2017 12:49:41
Studge had the third best goal involvement stats this season ahead of both Firmino and Mane. That doesn't mean he's amazing but it does mean he's not a has-been. Couple this with the fact that almost every start he's been given is against deep lying defences which give him no room its little surprise that he's not setting the world on fire. If he wants to stay I'd have no hesitation in keeping him. If he wants to go I'd say thanks for everything and please be injured when you play Liverpool.


19 Dec 2017 20:25:43
If Henderson wasn't the captain who would be a good choice?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

19 Dec 2017 20:36:00
The vice captain.


19 Dec 2017 20:39:20
I’d say Firmino, I know he isn’t the most vocal player but he always leads by example and puts 100% in every match. He is everything Klopp wants in a player. If I were to pick another player to be captain I would pick Lallana for the same reasons. In the future maybe gomez as I think he is a vocal player who also gives his all just lacks experience!


19 Dec 2017 20:47:01
Ox springs to my mind, I think he'd do a top job followed by Gomez in the future.


19 Dec 2017 20:54:40
Good call lfcleon.


19 Dec 2017 21:11:37
Gomez! Said it a while back, once he cements a place in the centre I would make him captain.


19 Dec 2017 23:17:47
Don’t think Hendo is anywhere near done yet, but with Milner and Couts (how did he get the armband? ) and Can likely to move on I think the likely candidates are Bobby, Lallana, and here’s a controversial one, Lovren.
No wait! Come back! He seems a player based on confidence and in my opinion is our best defender. Yes frustratingly inconsistent but a vote of confidence such as the captaincy could be the making of him? Maybe? Anyhow think it will eventually be Gomez but not yet.


19 Dec 2017 23:24:33
Good question and the fact there are few others that are capable or worthy speaks volumes. We are crying our for 2 or 3 leaders . Problem is they are few and far between.


19 Dec 2017 23:26:12
If Hendo wasn’t Captain I would give it to Hendo 👍.


20 Dec 2017 03:26:28
lallana when fit.


20 Dec 2017 07:49:03
"If Hendo wasn't captain, then the new captain would be whoever Klopp picked" - Michael Owen.


20 Dec 2017 07:51:52
Spot on, Mikey. Hendo is captain and has been capt. under two managers. Why this is even a discussion, I will never know.


20 Dec 2017 08:38:49
Id go for lovren. Feel like the responsibility would do him good.


20 Dec 2017 11:21:11
Karius- it would put the keeper fiasco to bed.


19 Dec 2017 15:19:23
Hi fellow reds,

one for banter.

I was just wondering which striker you guys would like to see leave in January either permanently or on loan.

My shout would be Sturridge on a permanent move as when he plays he just jogs around at 75% now and he has definitely lost a yard of pace which was his main strength.

I think Solanke is getting good experience with us even though it is not often enough. Ings could do with some game time out on loan but I would rather keep him for cover.

Believable4 Unbelievable2

19 Dec 2017 15:41:34
out of the strikers Lfc has on books which includes Struddige, solanke, ings, firminio, origi and brewster, only 3 can stay in the first team. Firminio is a starter and then i want to keep Solanke and Brewster as a back up. i agree with u about sturridge and i think Ings will take a year or so to get back to complete fitnes and sharpness. And as per the rumours that we are about to loose brewster as he wants game time i would like to keep him in the team by giving him decent game time.


19 Dec 2017 16:28:30
Sturridge and Ings will both leave for first team football unless they get it over the next 6 months. Maybe even in January. Origi will likely stay at Wolfsburg. Brewster will probably sign for BVB or Juventus. I'm not convinced we need any more strikers even if those 4 leave. How many first team appearances have they made combined this season? About 8?

That leaves Firmino, Salah, Mane, Solanke and Woodburn; all capable of playing as a striker.

Next summer I'd focus on signing a creative attacker to replace Coutinho, adding another centre back if that isn't done in January, a right back to replace Clyne, an experienced keeper to replace Mignolet/ Ward/ Bogdan (with Karius No.1 and Grabara No.3) and a midfielder to replace Can. Other than that, just replacing any other first team regulars who leaves unexpectedly.


19 Dec 2017 16:50:54
One comment I would make is that none of our strikers are what you could call top class twenty a season types, for various reasons, so when you compare us to City, United, Chelsea and Spurs we are possibly lacking. But equally I’d expect Salah to get to twenty and he’ll be ably backed up with Firmino, Mane and Coutinho all getting double figures so it’s swings and roundabouts and for me, Centre defence, centre midfield and goalkeeper positions are the bigger concerns.


19 Dec 2017 17:42:34
Keep up with the scoring stats Mr Dennis.


19 Dec 2017 18:47:35
Firmino has thirteen before christmas.


19 Dec 2017 18:52:07
Our forward line is a natural goalscorer by "commitee" as in, all front players can score double digit goals and if they are all chipping in with double digit goals, who care about having some natural CF who if he has a bad game, the team is screwed. Ask Spurs and Harry Kane.


19 Dec 2017 19:17:50
Ings and sturridge should both leave for their own sake, when they were brought in they were good players and what we need, but the shape of the squad has changed and it is best for them to leave. Both good players when fit and firing and i wish nothing but the best for them.

I would keep one of origi or brewster but it is up to klopp to decide which one.


19 Dec 2017 19:41:30
Mr Dennis are spurs above us in the table? And apart from city we battling with the others for second place so for us lagging behind them as you say we aren't doing to bad are we? Another one of your posts that is just total nonsense.


19 Dec 2017 20:39:57
Spurs battered us though didn’t they? We still don’t have a top class striker and that is a fact, dress it up any way you like, we dropped 4 points against West Brom and Everton because we lacked a focal point for our attack when they sat back.


19 Dec 2017 21:33:13
Salah or Firmino not top class? You're having laugh?


19 Dec 2017 21:56:45
Lol exactly MK. I think he is having a laugh mate, surely?


19 Dec 2017 22:52:58
Spurs didn't batter us we literally handed them the game.


19 Dec 2017 23:24:20
Studge is done I’m afraid, and injuries have robbed ings of a potential fruitful stint with us following a good start. Bobby first choice, Solanke challenging him and Brewster to come through behind them when needed. Whilst I would like to see Ings make something with us I just can’t see it happening. Let’s hope he proves me wrong. Basically I’m a believer in having a definitive first 11 with another 11 players capable of filling in/ challenging and doing similar jobs to those first 11, supported by youth players coming through.


20 Dec 2017 08:42:38
We might as well sell Sturridge and Ings in January to be honest. That leaves us with Firmino, Solanke and Brewster as well as Salah and Mane to fill in if needed. We have 2 great young stikers in Solanke and Brewster, we can't let them rot in the reserves.


{Ed025's Note - both a bit raw yet for me Cyklopps, they may develop into great players but they are not there yet, especially with brewster it should be slowly slowly catchee monkey mate..

20 Dec 2017 10:24:43
Good Point Ed25 I think I can agree with you on Brewster as he is very young but I just hate to see our young talent get wasted like it has the last few years (Suso, Texiera, Smith, Coady, Rossiter) .
I really like what Everton have done with their youngsters. Having their first team players and then instead of buying in players for Squad rotation they give them places to their youngsters and I think in a few years it will all be worth it for the likes of Davies, Kenny, Calvert Lewin and Holgate.
And As for us Why not just move Salah to Striker then if Firmino get injured? I think it would work better to have someone like Solanke on the bench who need minutes then if needed instead of having someone like Sturridge who unfortunately look like he's passed it.


{Ed025's Note - as stevie wonder wrote " the children are our future" Cyklopps, i love how everton have used ours but maybe that was out of necessity rather than planning, its nice to see youngsters progress though and liverpool have some good youngsters of their own, but they need to give them a little run out now and then in a league cup game or coming off the bench when a game is won mate..

19 Dec 2017 14:49:14
Hi Eds, is it true or just rumours that Athletico have reported Barcelona for an illegal approach for Greizzman?
Could have implications for ourselves if true.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - you are on the wrong page - it is nothing to do with Manchester United.}

19 Dec 2017 14:53:41
Im thinkin along the lines of if its true and they get a transfer ban. Which effects us with Coutinho. i couldn't give a toss about utd.


{Ed002's Note - No, Coutinho wants to move on from Liverpool. This is nothing to do with Liverpool at all. I have explained the situation with Coutinho over and over again.

19 Dec 2017 15:16:01
cheers.


19 Dec 2017 15:10:16
i was thinkin along the lines of Coutinho Ed.


19 Dec 2017 15:38:48
The only link I can think of to greizman is if they can come up with the money for both. AG looks like it's going to happen and the noise coming out of Spain is that we value coutinho much higher than Barcelona do and their offer may be less than what they looked to offer last summer. The figures touted are less than €100mil, we have a problem now in that coutinho needs to go as he will start playing up as/ when the window opens if he thinks he's not getting his move but we can accept what we deem to be unacceptable. Their are a few that think that Barcelona will come in very low just so they can say he was too expensive when the offer is turned down. It all sounds worrying as we could be left with a very unhappy player.


{Ed002's Note - I have explained the situation with Coutinho, the significance of November 30 and the players Barcelona has available to fund incoming players.}

19 Dec 2017 16:05:04
Do you think we are going to price him out of the move Ed?, it seems to be the most likely scenario judging by all of the noise.


{Ed002's Note - Barcelona are looking at other options now given that no agreement could be reached by November 30. Ideally they would like Coutinho and he wants to join them - and he has had two family members and Kia begging at the Boston offices of the owners to let him have his wish. Typically clubs will let a player who wishes to leave move on should a suitable offer be made - it avoids disruption and allows someone else to come in to ensure a settled squad. If Liverpool wish to price him out of a move and accept any consequences they can easily do that. I would expect Barcelona to make another offer and then perhaps to turn elsewhere.}

19 Dec 2017 16:53:05
Thing is though Ed, Barcelona haven’t made a suitable offer as yet, if he wants to go AND they make a suitable offer then everyone is happy.


19 Dec 2017 17:25:32
That's the trouble Mr D, I don't think we are going to get what we deem to be an acceptable offer and Barcelona will spin it that we asked for way to much money. I don't think we want to include any of their players not ones that they are willing to lose anyway. So we are left with a choice of accepting less than we feel he is worth or holding on to an unhappy player.


{Ed002's Note - Barcelona has no need to "spin" anything. Why would they do that?}

19 Dec 2017 17:31:27
Same family members who were spouting off to the media in the summer? Let them beg,


{Ed002's Note - It shows how much he wants the move. Perhaps you yshould try and figure out why there is so much unrest?}

19 Dec 2017 17:55:46
Stop grabbing at straws. Get rid of him, we held firm in summer and it hasn't helped anyone. Why can't people see this? He's a shadow of the player he was and all parties as a whole would be better off with the deal to go through.


19 Dec 2017 18:18:16
You are right aoe, 5 league goals, 5 assists, 5 more champions league goals, he’s proving to be absolutely useless this season!


19 Dec 2017 18:31:38
Yep, and imagine how great a position we'd be in if his attitude was right. Make no mistake, id love if he was happy and settled and shooting on all cylinders but he's not at all near his best. It's testament to his quality that he can reach those numbers with his attitude the way he is. It shows how talented he is that he can do little in a match and still pull off some magic. As it is, his behaviour has been dreadful and the fans allow it cos every few games he turns in a cracking performance or more likely does something brilliant to get a goal. You might recall Suarez was in a similar position but he never dropped his performance- in fact he raised it. Coutinho raises his game when he feels like it and for a club like ours, it's not enough. We're fighting for 4th and carrying a player instead of relying on his fantastic ability.


19 Dec 2017 18:41:34
The Coutinho you are describing is the same Coutinho that has been playing for the last 5 years, he has always had periods where he has played brilliantly and others where he has disappeared. There was the incident in August which was disappointing but other than that it’s been business as usual, he has always been inconsistent and this season is no different.


19 Dec 2017 18:55:28
If Barcelona want him they should pay the asking price, the same way people on this site say we should do instead of putting in unrealistic offers which is what's repeatedly stated if we don't meet the asking price straight away. the attitude is never that the players club are pricing him out of a move. it does be"Liverpool know the asking pays and what they have to pay". after all, we have"no want or need to sell".


{Ed002's Note - what asking price is that?}

19 Dec 2017 18:59:00
aoe i agree we should let him go but it should be for our valuation not what Barcelona reckon they can get away with paying if they unsettle him enough or get every player on their staff to state how good a signing he'd be.


{Ed002's Note - it was Coutinho who approached Barcelona and they have done everything by the book. You need to get over these delusions.}

19 Dec 2017 19:39:55
Fair enough, if he was big and bold enough to approach Barcelona he should also be man enough to realise that we shouldn't have to sell him for anything under what we believe he is worth. you asked me"what asking price is that? ". that asking price is whatever amount we decide he is worth, in the current transfer climate i doubt we'd accept less than £120m. At this stage i'd imagine the club would sell if Barcelona match whatever amount we'd be willing to sell him for but neither Barcelona or Coutinho should be expecting the club to simply roll over and sell him for anything less than that.


{Ed002's Note - It is just another transfer - no more, no less, and there is nothing special about.}

19 Dec 2017 20:18:58
Well I feel really sorry for Barcelona, they wanted some agreement by Nov 30th, and to sell Couts for a low price,
why did we not do as they asked,
they prob see Liverpool as a smaller club who will just fall in line,
Suarez is just one more player / ex Barcelona player who works off their blueprint of un settling player, club and Fans,
and Couts is playing quite well at the moment, he is our player, we should set the price and yes, come the summer let him go, giving us time to bring in the right replacement .


19 Dec 2017 20:26:08
Meet the asking price he goes. if not he stays! your right, nothing special about dat.


19 Dec 2017 21:38:57
well said Big Emre .


19 Dec 2017 22:12:06
Why doesn't Couts ask for a transfer request if he wants to go that badly
?


{Ed002's Note - Coutinho submitted a transfer request in August.}

19 Dec 2017 22:23:21
Oh sorry. Missed that. We need to just let him go. Need players who want to play.


19 Dec 2017 23:13:15
You are spot on Big Emre

BTW, it seems Barcelona has special deadlines every month regarding Coutinho. They already broke their own "deadlines" several times.

So guys we are not the only club being managed by clowns, we have some stiff competition out there

Just want to draw them in the CL QF and do them a new one.


19 Dec 2017 23:45:13
Denzil, why do we? At the end of this year he will have 4 years left on his contract. Yes I understand that he may throw a little wobbler but he is a pro, and if he refuses to play then what message will that send to any to potential buyers? He won’t want to lose his Brazil place either so he will want to play? I didn’t see Utd backing down over De Gea, where would they be now without him? I didn’t see Southampton backing down over VVD? Or arsenal over Sanchez, Napoli over Koulibaly, the list goes on and on over and over. Question is Are we better off with a proven quality player for the next 4 years and him leaving for free when he’s 29 years old with the occasional whinge on the way, Or better having to spend likely the entirety of the money from his sale on a player who may not be as good, Lemar for example, looks good in a weak French league, can he do it here? Maybe. I don’t know what’s best but I know that if I signed for a club for 5 and a half years, I’d feel pretty bloody stupid about that same club not allowing me to leave 6 months later just because I suddenly saw some potentially greener grass elsewhere. Unlucky son, iv said it before and will again now, the club comes first. Even if Couts becomes the worlds best player and is remembered in the same vein as Pele, Maradona, Messi and Ronaldo, (unlikely) eventually he will be forgotten whilst the club will live on.


20 Dec 2017 09:53:14
Hey ED thanks for all your info, do you think the lack of agreement in this negotiation is on Liverpools side or asking price too high, or do you think that Barcelona are trying to to under pay? Maybe if everyone had release clauses in the contracts it'd be simpler lol.


{Ed002's Note - Liverpool did not want to sell in the summer. That is why there was no agreement.}

20 Dec 2017 10:21:10
Can nobody remember coutinho's behaviour this summer? He declared he'd do whatever the club wanted and then when we said no he threw his toys out of the pram? He handed in a transfer request and then declared he had a back injury and refused to play until magically he turned out for Brazil. His behaviour has been shocking and personally I can't see why Barcelona would want a player who does that. The sooner he leaves the better. It would take a gerrard turn around before I'd forgive him. And I really am disappointed that both clubs can't come to an agreement before the window. With many of our dealings, it's a mess.


20 Dec 2017 10:47:38
Unfortunately none of us our privy to the negotiations that have been happening so we can't realistically comment. Coutinho is an asset to what is effectively a business. the owners of LFC will have a price for that asset and are well within their right to sell or not to sell. Yes, keeping him will have implications on the squad harmony etc, but that is no reason to drop from the value you have. As business owners, i trust them to try and get the best deal possible for LFC whilst hopefully being fair to the players wishes and not being completely unrealistic in their valuation.


20 Dec 2017 11:25:36
Spot on stui though so far, our owners have shown little savvy in the art of negotiation and dealings with other clubs. Personally, I'd love yer stegan as part of the deal and trust klopp with whatever money he was given from the deal.


19 Dec 2017 12:01:35
Brover and smeghead, I'm sure lovren is a lovely lad and is not playing badly on purpose, but stop it with this "sympathy for a human being" and "family problems" etc. This is purely about ability on a football pitch, it's his job. If he worked in a factory and kept making error after error, do you think his boss would say "its OK dejan you keep messing up you were a refugee", and I'm sure the man himself wouldn't want you making excuses for him like the ones you've said here, support him all you want but give footballing reasons why you support him not excuses.

Believable23 Unbelievable17

21 Dec 2017 14:12:22
If he worked in a factory they'd sign him off work. I know they would because they did for me when i was struggling with mental health.

No offence Waro, but you seem to be under educated on mental health and how severe it is. The brain is the most important organ in the body and yet it is the only one which we refuse to acknowledge can have problems. It isn't your fault if you don't understand it, it just wasn't understood or even well documented until very recently. When i had depression and i had a violent outburst at my dad, he just kicked me out the house. That same week i came within 50 yards of a deliberate head on collision with an artic lorry. I needed support, not deriding. I climbed out of my hole, but many people don't.

Football and society has a major problem in this area. Aaron Lennon is one of the only players i can think of to go public and he got the help and time away he needed to come back when he was ready. The fact you would even dare to call it an "excuse" is bordering on abhorrent. That will offend a lot more people than just myself. Every feeling and emotion is a chemical reaction in the brain, and depression is caused by chemical imbalances.

You wouldn't be saying this if Lovren had cancer, yet mental health is just as damaging to a persons well being if not diagnosed, managed and treated. Two people i know have committed suicide in the last two years of my life. One a middle aged man, and another a young girl. It strikes anyone at any time. I don't know if Lovren is in that place (and i really hope not), but we as supporters should feel morally obliged to support him through his troubles.

"But he earns £100k a week" is irrelevant. Robin Williams was a millionaire Hollywood actor and his cash didn't help him either. When you are ill, you are ill. You don't get to just force yourself to feel better when you have a visible illness, and the invisible illnesses in the brain are no different.

I get your point that we are not a charity and we shouldn't just accept his form. However right now, we are so lacking in options that we can't afford to sign him off for 6 months to recover. He is doing us a favour playing through his problems and we should respect that if nothing else. He has nothing to gain from it. We'd have to pay him regardless because he is under contract. Sympathy is very different to acceptance. I accept his performances aren't good enough, but i also have enough respect for a fellow human being not to actively try and compound the mental difficulties he is having.

I hope i haven't offended you because this is a subject i am vehemently passionate about, and i am only seeking to educate others on the difficulties that surround the brain, it's health, and the impact it can have on us and others. Lovren has been through a lot as a child, and being burgled at gun point will have had a huge impact on the regression of his mental state. You have every right as a paying supporter to want him taken out of the team whilst he recovers, but until we sign another centre back, we should all just respect that Lovren is putting in 100% on the pitch whilst battling demons none of us will ever fully understand. Maybe he wouldn't get support in every industry. However, football is one industry which has the financial resources to fully support this major health problem, and it is also in a relative position of power due to it's position as a major role model in society. It could make a difference.

Again, i really hope nobody is offended by this. I know it isn't strictly Liverpool related Eds, but i think this is a really important subject that is being brushed under the carpet by people not taking it seriously, particularly in sport. I hope it's acceptable for these pages, but I'll understand if not.


21 Dec 2017 15:57:05
Touching waro.
If he worked in a factory and had personal issues that effected his performance he would be given a long period of absence to sort it out, as he’s a footballer he’s forced to work in front to 50k people each week who are judging every moment then slag him off and send him death threats on social media immediately after. Little wonder he’s struggling really.


21 Dec 2017 17:12:26
Waro you are the one who brought money into the conversation, please tell me how money is a factor on the pitch? You want footballing reasons? How about in the last 2 1/ 2 seasons Lovren has had 3 errors that have led to goals, by comparison John Stones has had 6 over the same period. Lovren always gives 100% in a Liverpool shirt, he may mistakes but he’s not as bad as people make out and he certainly isn’t uncoachable.


21 Dec 2017 18:22:01
Can’t believe the number of thumbs down to that post. Maybe because Waro was a bit blunt about it perhaps but he is bang on. He may be having a rough time of it in his personal life, but it has very little to do with some of the howlers he has committed.

He has been carrying an injury however, which could be partially to blame, but most of his errors are down to bad decision making, simple as.


21 Dec 2017 18:29:16
Everyone is different though Waro some can switch off and focus on football as a release but if some of the stories are true about fearing the kidnapp of his kids and multi million pound ransoms by a known gangster then you can’t really blame him for his head being in the right place at times.
Agree that his performances haven’t been consistently good enough and you can’t ignore it completely just because of personal issues but if we had done what we should have in the summer and got another CB in then we could have taken him out the firing line at times.


21 Dec 2017 19:14:52
the thing is waro, when we love a football team we love the players too. if Lallana were in a car crash and in hospital I would be worried for him and his family, I wouldn't just be upset that he couldn't play. dejan has been playing better recently and klavan looks a different player. I really feel we are going to buy vvd in January. I don't think we can win this league with the cbs we have.


19 Dec 2017 11:41:35
Hello Redmen,

What a difference a weekend makes. I see people now talking about us breaking into the top 2 which is always nice to read.

Just FYI this will be my last loan update until after Christmas. Firstly because there seems to be matches every day so it is hard to keep up but also because I am going to be pretty busy/ drunk and won't have the time.

Ryan Kent did not make the squad as Freiburg drew 3-3 with Augsburg.

Jordan Williams came off the bench in the 75th minute as he continues his return from injury as Rochdale drew 0-0 with Oxford.

Gomes was an unused sub as Forest Green lost 2-0 to Luton

Allan played the full 90 as Apollon thrashed Olympiakos Nicosia 5-0.
Apollon are currently in a 3 team race for the title.

Orig started for Wolfsburg at the weekend despite his miss of the season contender a week earlier (if you haven't seen it he scooped it over from under the bar almost) .
He unfortunately did not make amends for his miss with opta scoring his performance at 4.8 (the worst on the pitch) . Wolfsburg lost to Koln 1-0.

Chirivella played for 88 mins as Willem II lost 3-2 at home to PEC. They were 2-0 up at half time!
The defeat leaves them just 3 points above the drop zone.

Shamal George was not in the squad as Carlisle lost 2-1 at home to Port Vale.

Connor Randall continued in Hearts starting 11 after earning his place back last week. This week he started at Left back as Hearts faced a Celtic team unbeaten in 69 domestic matches.
However Randall produced a solid performance which helped Hearts keep a clean sheet and he got an assist as Hearts thumped Celtic 4-0.
Sorry Brendan

Ojo and Fulham visited Sunderland in confident mood with good form on their side and facing a Sunderland team who had not won at home for a year!
Unfortunately for Ojo the only thing he left Sunderland with is a yellow card as 18year old Sunderland substitute Josh Maja on for his debut scored the winner 5 minutes after coming off the bench.

A strange game for RBL saw them lose 3-2 at home to Hertha Berlin despite playing against 10 men for most of the match.
Hertha took the lead in the 5th before being reduced to 10 men in the 7th. However they found themselves 3-0 up in the 50th!
RBL fought back but it was to little to late as they recorded back to back defeats in the league.
Keita played the full 90 and scored a 7.8 on opta, the second highest of any RBL player.

And that's your lot redmen.
Heres hoping we beat Arsenal on Friday, I work with 3 gooner fans and they are not confident for this one. They are at home and so will be expected to attack, hopefully we will be able to pick them off on the counter.

Believable24 Unbelievable0

19 Dec 2017 11:52:36
Thank you xx.


19 Dec 2017 13:34:57
Cheers carra. Have a good one mate.


19 Dec 2017 14:47:35
Thank's a million Carra. Happy Christmas.


19 Dec 2017 14:48:11
Tell you what carra, you're such a legend we'll let you off until next year.

Have a good one mate 👍.


19 Dec 2017 15:27:26
Ron is back🤣.


19 Dec 2017 16:00:09
Thanks all,

Merry Xmas to you all to.

Ron, where have you been? Someone hacked your account and were saying all types of negative things :)


19 Dec 2017 10:27:34
To all Eds and posters.

Do you find the new generation has got into us too, Like with everyone taking mobiles to games instead of actually watching and enjoying the moment. Even after a win it seems to be all about the end of the season. I found myself looking ahead to the next few fixtures seeing how many point we could get and how many points the teams around us can drop. I should have been enjoying the moment of winning 4-0 against Bournemouth, I should have been enjoying the moment, I should have been grateful that the lads put in such an entertaining performance.

Im finding myself and other fans forgetting to just live in that moment, Celebrating the lads winning, Or defending them to the world when we lose. But nope from match day 1 onwards its all about where we finish instead of enjoying the journey.

Believable6 Unbelievable0

19 Dec 2017 19:14:55
Completely agree with you, this is all stuff i frequently moan about.

However if i was to say something about that it would be that it is not my generation who record matches on their phones and gawp, its the elders who are still in awe of the technology at their disposal. And the tourists. People my age can only dream of being on a steady enough income to afford a season ticket, and when we get the chance to go, we wouldn't dare record it on our phones. When i go the game i see both tourists and people who have held season tickets for decades on their phones all the time. Its the generation gap that is killing anfield, not neccasarily the foreign fans as so many oafs solely blame it on. If anfield was full of more lads like me and my friends as opposed to the whinging middle aged men it currently services, it would be a better place. On your second point, people my age seem less inclined to be obsessed with this strange end goal, this new golden age of liverpool that older fans see on the horizon. We are not entitled to win anything, and that is not going to happen again. We enjoy each game as it comes, we enjoy players while they are here. Im too young to get depressed waiting for liverpool to win a league title, as so many seem to do. Liverpool football club is first and foremost a community, a relief from the outside world. If people cannot enjoy a 4-0 win, or support the boys when they lose because they are simply waiting for us to win a league title, i feel they have simply missed the point of liverpool football club altogether, and should find a different outlet to invest their time in.


19 Dec 2017 02:12:26
Ed002 Genuine question so hope you have some info
From the outside looking in it appears to the layman that Spanish clubs in the top echelon seem to have a lot of funding for transfers, mostly it seems when it comes to trying to purchase high level players, im sure Couthino, De Gea, Hazard etc have all been looked at in recent times as it seems common knowledge that these lads are much sought after,
Id like to know what their wage structure is in general compared to The Premier league? We sought of know that Man city can pay top wages but what comparison is there on that score with the Spanish league?
And as im an LFC fan is it such a huge difference when it comes to what LFC can pay or say Spurs compared to such as Man City/ Utd?
Im not bothered to be complaining Im just interested in the difference in what clubs can offer a player and what clubs have pulling power when compared to others.
Also my sons a massive Chelsea fan, as it seems you probably are, what's your assessment so far? My lads none too happy with the old loan system and isn't the biggest Courtois fan this season!
A very merry xmas to all the eds and to all the regular posters too, its a minefield of opinions some days but in all fairness in between ups and downs its such a good website and i personally check in everyday, top lads and lasses everywhere YNWA.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Real Madrid and Barcelona have the highest wage bill of football clubs world-wide. After that come PSG and then Manchester United. They can do this because they are two of the three highest revenue earning clubs - with Manchester United. Additionally they, particularly Real Madrid, manage their spending on players well - bringing in significant income from sales. Both have manageable debt - compared say to Manchester United who still have significant debt that needs servicing. Additionally, both sides top the sponsorship leagues ahead of Manchester United and Chelsea and they are second and fifth placed in terms of CL income over the past five years (behind Juventus). LFC are toward the bottom end of the top 10 overall because they have not had sustained Champions League income - Chelsea are fourth in the lis of CL income and Liverpool are way, way down. In terms of annual sponsorship Chelsea are again fourth and Liverpool seventh at a little over half what Chelsea has and a third of what Barcelona has. Liverpool has a 7% debt right now (that is 7% of the total value of the club) whist Chelsea are debt free. This is not an insignificant amount of debt that Liverpool has but when compared to Inter's 37%, Roma's 31% and Milan's 73% it is not a major concern. Spurs carry 17% of debt right now and Manchester United 24% - so when all of that is taken in to account Liverpool are in reasonable financial shape - but they cannot run wild with the spending. Liverpool's income has been boosted by the sale of players such as Suarez and Sterling and will be going forward will be again with the sale of Coutinho and, at some point, Salah. Putting aside the two major Spanish sides, the rest of the Spanish clubs have suffered with the economy and only Atletico are in the top 20 income wise. In Italy the game is debt ridden and needs to address that - Juventus is by far and away in best shape - in fact very similar to Liverpool. In terms of wages paid in the Premier League the top five are Mancheser Unted, Manchster City, Chesea, Arsenal and then Livepool.

As for the loan system, Chelsea has a business model where players are loaned out for experience - some come through to the first team (Courtois, Christensen) and some have demands that are to rich for the club (Solanke), some move on to get frrst team football on a regular basis (Chalobah, Ake) and some fall by the way side as they don't cut at the level Chelsea want. It works.

Thanks for the question and have a good holiday period.}

19 Dec 2017 11:37:50
Great question OP and an equally great, insightful answer. Thank you ED02.


19 Dec 2017 11:56:05
Nice reply Ed 2 interesting read.


19 Dec 2017 12:09:28
That’s what makes this site so good.

Great question and thanks to ed002 for the detailed reply.


{Ed002's Note - You are welcome.}

19 Dec 2017 13:11:58
ED if you don't mind, how does man city fare on this list?

I see they are second in the wage bill, which is surprising as I thought they will be topping that list.


{Ed002's Note - Manchester City are assessed to be the fifth most valuable overall, in terms of sponsorship they are 8th - just behind Liverpool, and in terms of the 5 year Champions League income they are 7th beind Juve, RM, Bayern Munich, Chelsea, Barcelona and PSG (in order 1 - 6). They carry debt of 5% and pay the second highest wages in England (fourth worldwide). Their commercial income is skewed somewhat and eventually that will have to be resolved - attempts have been made to deal with it under FFP.}

19 Dec 2017 13:16:51
Just to build on the Chelsea loan system point, did anyone see Terry discussing Salah (and by extension De Bruyne) last night? It was quite an interesting perspective on how it works for Chelsea from a player on the ground level.


19 Dec 2017 13:33:19
Thank you Ed2. Great information. Hope you and yours have a great Christmas!


{Ed002's Note - You are welcome - thanks.}

19 Dec 2017 13:57:47
Salah? Have I missed something.


19 Dec 2017 13:48:30
Thank you ed! very informative. I was wondering about their income and ffp compliance. I figured they are set up in a similar way to PSG!


{Ed002's Note - Manchester City (a) have a larger income than most, and (b) whilst working within the rules are making use of some pretty extreme sponsorship that comes via their owner's business interests. So the figures are skewed.

This is seen as an issue by UEFA and the reason there have been efforts over the past four years or so to agree a sponsorship cap. UEFA are happy for those "elite" European clubs that meet (now twice or three times a year) to come up with a proposal, but so far they have failed to agree a figure. UEFA are aware that taking the matter to the European Club Association will not help them. Eventually they will come up with a cap themselves and that will be it. A similar issue is being discussed about capping TV and media income for FFP. With a UEFA senior official moved on it might be easier to push something through as the resistance was related to the three clubs that would be most impacted by a change include Manchester City and two clubs that play in the French league.

Effectively the cap would say something like, "regardless of the amount of sponsorship a club obtains, only the first €115M will be allowable for the purposes of the FFP calculation". The same could be done with the media income - obviously that would hit the English sides and a few others only. It is contraversial but there is a swell of effort from other sides to make it happen. One side who were leading the push pulled out of the group of "elite" sides earlier this year so it will take others to pick up the ball on that one. But it is fair to say that mainland European sides do not see it as fair that the English sides can benefit from media income and would like a more level playing field.}

19 Dec 2017 14:40:33
What I fail to understand in your answer ed is the fact that you talk about Chelsea’s loan system and say it works yet when Liverpool do the same thing with the likes of Luis Alberto, Markovic and the like we are ruining people’s careers. It would seem to me that you are showing a massive biase towards Chelsea who in my view pick players up and drop them like they are nothing.


{Ed002's Note - where is Markovic playing right now? How much did Liverpool pay for him? How much have Liverpool continued to pay a third party for him until recently? There is no bias, Chelsea have a well documented and understood system that sees the progress of loan players monitored and if they make the cut then they are integrated in to the squad. Liverpool don’t - it is a shambles that often sees no contact with the players whilst on loan. Grujic will get a loan to avoid him walking away for nothing. Markovic will leave or will walk away for nothing two weeks after the end of the season. And this is in addition to players who are already unsettled at the club. Klopp interfered with Ward’s loan leaving him in limbo now. You have no idea about what happens at Chelsea and spend too much of your time trying to pick holes in what I say. Clearly your knowledge of the game is about zip.}

19 Dec 2017 15:27:55
Thank you ed!


{Ed002's Note - You are welcome.}

19 Dec 2017 15:29:25
In fairness our loan set up is a shambles unfortunately.


19 Dec 2017 15:47:07
I can see why teams in Europe would want to level the playing field in terms of tv money, if it was an even keel there's no way I'd be plying my trade in the north of England when I could be cutting around in Spain, Italy or France.


19 Dec 2017 16:12:39
Ed you can’t come onto a Liverpool page spouting your usual tripe about how great Chelsea are at everything and how Liverpool are lower than a snakes belly then get annoyed when Liverpool fans pull you up on it. I don’t pretend to know more than you, I don’t. I just think your views are massively skewed because you are a Chelsea fan and hate Liverpool and everything about Liverpool.
It’s ok though I haven’t got many nice things to say about Chelsea either. To me they are everything that’s wrong with football today. Each to their own though.


{Ed002's Note - I was asked by a poster whose sons are Chelsea supporters. I am not in any way biased. Chelsea's policy and execution of a loan system to gain experience for players works extremely well - there is no one denyiong that except you. Liverpool do not have such a policy. You raised Markovic not me - it is a prime example of how bad Liverpool are at dealing with loans. You raised Luis Alberton - he was sent on loan after the embarrassment of a court case and not to gain experience. And do you think Klopp did Danny Ward a favour by cancelling his loan and then not giving hjim a chance? Now he is third choice and has no future at Liverpool. I certainly don't "hate" Liverpool and have only ever written anything that is truthful. I have no idea what you know about Chelsea but it seems very little - the same is true of your knowledge of Liverpool. You are trolling posts again and making an embarrassment of yourself - it makes a lot more sense for the other posters if you don't visit the site any more. You are not interested in what is going on. You just want to wreck the posts of others.}

19 Dec 2017 16:13:16
Thanks for that Ed02, a very insightful answer and much appreciated, have a great xmas, cheers!


{Ed002's Note - You are welcome.}

19 Dec 2017 16:20:47
our loan system and Chelsea can't even be compared. If we had De bryne in our youth academy and with the loan system we have we would have screwd his career completly.


19 Dec 2017 18:53:00
Spot on about Ward Ed. Imagine if Chelsea had recalled Courtois 6 months into his loan deal to watch Cech between the sticks where would he be now. I believe he was at Athletico 2 seasons before he was deemed ready and now he's in the top 3 in the league IMO.


{Ed002's Note - Right.}

21 Dec 2017 09:08:30
Thank you Ed002.


19 Dec 2017 09:06:05
I just realised the only team who has lost less games than us is Man City.

We can easily go on and finish second this season lads. Just got to be at the top of our game and not let it get to us that the title is already lost.

United are scraping through right now, and i watched them get passed off the pitch by West Brom on Sunday. De Gea is keeping them in the race single handedly right now.

Arsenal are just weak in every position except Kolasinac and Ozil.

Chelsea are weak in every position except Hazard, Kante, Azpilicueta and Courtois.

Spurs have capitulated and despite having a good team, their manager has lost the plot and started playing technically poor Sanchez, Wanyama, Sissoko, and Aurier.

2nd place is there for the taking.

Believable9 Unbelievable9

19 Dec 2017 09:37:05
I'd like to think so MK. Personally I'm hoping for a top 4 position, if we get above 4th we've made improvements and like you say, it certainly is possible. It'd be interesting to see Utd without De Gea, they wouldn't be anywhere close to where they are now without him and that's not me been bitter towards them, it's true. The lad is outstanding I hope he goes in the summer elsewhere, they will find it difficult replacing him.

I like to have the opinion of ' it's not over until it's over' Man City are indeed flying with the title right now, but we're not even half way through, anything could happen, I'm not saying we're going to go and win the league and I do believe City will do it but, should a few injuries happen and not go there way, it could disrupt them incredibly, this is football. What a league.


19 Dec 2017 09:44:21
That could very well be the case. It is a case of consistency and staying fresh, alltho some of the draws need to become wins in order for that to happen. This is similar to some of the Rafa's seasons, difference now is that we have squad depth.
All in all were doing better and better and our form looks like we'll have a strong run in a cup competition, hopefully the CL.


19 Dec 2017 10:58:19
A lot could depend on the CL. If we go far in it I think we'll struggle - too much of our squad will struggle with the extra games and pressure at the crunch time of the season. If we don't, and a few others like Chelsea do, I can see the 2nd-4th place competition still being up for grabs in the last few games of the season.


19 Dec 2017 11:23:30
Spot on, MK and the other posters. Since Klopp's first full season last year, we have only lost EIGHT games under him. Can you imagine that? With the way people lose their minds after a draw, you would think it was double that amount. It is not only that we don't just lose as much. We have never lost back to back under Klopp in the PL since the start of last season. This shows the ability of Klopp and the boys to bounce back after every defeat which is remarkable. The issue here now is the draws. e have to turn those into wins, ASAP if we wanna finish 2nd.

In addition to your observation MK, I noticed how tired and leggy Arsenal, Utd and Chelsea were towards the last 2o mins of thier games this weekend. Spurs were virtually knackered with half an hour to go vs City. This is what Klopp is trying to avoid and it showed on Sun as we played at a MUCH higher tempo from start to finish vs B'mouth. These teams are literally on their knees physically as they can't finish games cos they don't rotate esp. Chelsea and Spurs and Arsenal so we are he fresher team now and we should make this advantage count starting with Arsenal.


19 Dec 2017 11:25:53
I generally agree a lot with you mk, but don't underestimate chelsea and arsenal. chelsea isn't weak at all and arsenal isn't consistent but could be really good if their players tried, they were unlucky against manU for exemple. agree on utd and tottenham at the moment though.
btw really nice assessment on robertson.


19 Dec 2017 11:43:18
I'd say De Gea is more than single-handedly keeping United in games right now.

It's more like double-handedly, often both legs, the greater percentage of the surface area of his body, and most likely his face at one point or another.

Truly a ridiculous keeper, and the bane of many a United fax machine.


19 Dec 2017 12:40:57
If we cut out the draws, yes. The football clube can't always win by 4,5 goals. We won't always barnstorm teams. Souness is right that we have to find a way of turning those 0-0/ 1-1 games into 1-0/ 2-1 wins.

The draws are disastrous. Against 0-0 against ManU/ WBA becomes 1-0. 1-1 against CFC/ EFC becomes 2-1 etc. I get that we inevitably WILL draw some matches. But at this rate it's suicidal really. Ridiculous to think this team's lost only a game less than City yet we 18 points behind them.

Klopp and the players HAVE to muster a way to win those "high impact" and do so differetnly. By rights and merit, the team should of beaten WBA and EFC at home, which would of put us joint second right now.

Past coupla fixtures presented the team with an opportunity to wipe out the gap between us and 2nd place whils leaving Spurs and Arsenal further behind. That's what I mean by "high impact" matches cause of the effect they have. That opportunity was squandered.

That's why no matter the football clube brilliant front four and exhilarating performances, we'll ultimately either fall short or end making hard work of a walk in the park as happened last with top 4.

Upside of City's form is that there isn't really any standout from the rest of this bunch. 2nd and 3rd are there for the taking.
Bad news is that am not convinced of our ability to grip those position and run away with them.

There's no easy games in the league for sure, there are games which should be routine wins. You don't have to win them all, no. You just have to win enough of them, that's it.
Chelsea, City, Utd and Spurs win those.

This team will enthral and excite for sure. But ultimately his much harvest will it bring home? That's the most critical criteria. MK is posted the other day that anything above top 4 would be "overachieving".
I disagree. What Spurs been doing the last few years IS overachieving. LFC on the contrary have been underachieving to downright shambolic, given the vast monies spent since FSG arrival.


19 Dec 2017 13:26:02
*edit: lost a game MORE than City.


19 Dec 2017 13:30:19
the title looks gone but it is not over until the fat lady sings. I really fancy us to finish second. if we don't make top 4 then surely that is down to our defence. our attacking play is as good as anyone in the world and personally i'm not scared of anyone in the champions league. I think we have scored more European goals than anyone this year. Big games away at arsenal and utd, also Chelsea. I think those games will be the deciders as to who makes ucl. if we don't make it then the back three (cbs and gk) need dropping for good. Our team is so good and we are let down by stupid mistakes.

ox is coming good, I knew he would.
Robertson I really really like, a few weeks ago I claimed he is a one trick pony who can throw back post crosses in all day but his end product was so much more varied against bournmouth. More solid than Moreno (who I still like)
Klavan looks a different player from the poor cb of last year. he looks a really assured cb these days. I prefer him to matip all day. works harder and is more aware. I think confidence was a big factor for him last season.
Salah, what can I say? amazing player. him and couts are so deadly.

The player who I think needs to improve or sort his head out is mane. I love the guy, great player but I think he feels although he is in salah's shadow this season. last year mane was the man and now salah is. last year mane would have squared that ball against everton. either that or he would have buried it,

mane! we all know how good you are, you don't need to prove yourself to us, just play your game and forget about African rivalry.


21 Dec 2017 16:25:14
So having a top GK can get you second with a poorer team, hmm.


19 Dec 2017 08:49:08
I know this won't happen, but what do people think about Marco Asensio as a replacement for Philippe Coutinho?

Believable4 Unbelievable0

19 Dec 2017 09:10:12
Yeah I'd love it, but like you say, it won't happen.


19 Dec 2017 09:21:28
I'd snap your hand off for that Asensio is class and has an extremely bright future, Real would be stupid to let him go.


19 Dec 2017 11:25:54
Klopp's already way ahead of you, OP. I believe we put in a bid for him last Jan. but obviously it did not happen and clearly, it won't happen now.


19 Dec 2017 13:34:18
if we win ucl then I think couts will stay. I think this is the only way we can hope he will stay. The thing is pc is balon dor potential winner and he probably thinks he can only win it if he plays for barca. I just hope Barcelona prefer kdb or hazard.

We all thought gerrard was irreplaceable but we have managed well without the legend. we will be fine again. keita is coming remember.


{Ed002's Note - Coutinho does not want to play for Liverpool - he wants to play for Barcelona and has done everything he can to force a move. I thought this was clear.}

19 Dec 2017 08:34:20
The argument on gini not getting in the top sides. City aside, he'd get games at the top. United have Pogba matic and Herrera at the moment, he'd play. Chelsea have bakayoko and Kante and there's games I'd pick him over Fabregas or drinkwater. Arsenal, with a choice of Ramsey Wilshere and xhaka, he'd play. Spurs have played sissoko in the middle a bit, gini would get games.
The word is use for him this year is anonymous, but hopefully he'd regain form. At times you couldn't get the ball from him last year!

Believable5 Unbelievable6

19 Dec 2017 10:23:25
I agree mate. Gini would get games at City too. He is at least as good as Delph. He wouldn't start ahead of Fernandinho, Silva or De Bruyne but he'd definitely get game time.

He's a decent utility player if nothing else. One we don't appreciate enough. Is he good enough to be starting in a title winning team? Arguably not. But as City are proving with Delph this season, a utility player can get you through an injury crisis if nothing else. Gini will be vital at times over a long season.

He looks bad this season because he was so contrastingly good last season, but he can't help that we've moved away from the tactics which suited him.


19 Dec 2017 11:56:26
I agree that right now the tactics don't suit him. That being said, It is almost January so he needs to adjust because right now he isn't giving us very much.


19 Dec 2017 11:58:35
Delph plays a hybrid LB/ CM position for City which he is awful at. Do you think Gini would play there and this is coming from a Gini fan who has been frustrated with his disappearing acts away from home?


19 Dec 2017 20:57:14
I think that Delph is having a very good season, and plays a lot of forward passes, Gini on the other hand has been a passenger for most games, he goes missing in all away games, and most of his passes are 5 to 10 yard passes backwards and sideways,
I hope that Gini improves, or he won't get many games next season when the midfield is re vamped .


19 Dec 2017 23:06:21
I wouldn't call him a utility player, he played one game at CB badly, and is now being asked to play a little deeper and doesn't seem to manage. I think he can be decent holding, as he's quick, decent passer and strong on the ball, just needs to work on position and actually getting involved a bit.


19 Dec 2017 04:12:08
Salah to Real Madrid for 100 million. Coutinho to Barça in exchange for Suarez! What am I reading today? 🤒.

Believable2 Unbelievable6

19 Dec 2017 04:21:29
There is a simple solution, don’t read this rubbish in the first place.


19 Dec 2017 06:19:44
You are in control of what you choose to read, my friend.


19 Dec 2017 08:09:35
£100m? What are they doing? Bidding for Salah's services, or his signed shirt?

Double that and then maybe we'll open talks about Asensio and Varane being included as well.


19 Dec 2017 08:40:26
What am I reading to my daughter today apparently Dipsey has fallen out with Lala and Tinkeywinky is due to have a bath this morning.
Hopefully not true!


19 Dec 2017 08:45:43
Salah has also come out and said he wants to win titles with Liverpool.

Media is a strange old thing, to sell a newspaper they need eye catchIng stories. If they don’t have anything concrete just make it up.


19 Dec 2017 10:27:23
He might be reading transfer banter. Shocking on this site aye?
Anywho salah will go eventually right? Only factor I can see him sraying for is if klopp continues building the squad to be consistent challengers for titles. Even then I don't think that'll be enough to prevent our best players leaving for likes of real and barca.


{Ed002's Note - I have explained that Salah had his agent enquire if Real Madrid would be interested in him - try the search engine.}

19 Dec 2017 13:00:40
Should he be instructing his agent to ask if Ronaldo is interested in him? Seeing as the stroppy git doesn’t enjoy anyone else scoring aside from himself :)


 
Change Consent