Liverpool Banter Archive December 19 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

19 Dec 2014 22:47:32
Brendan, If you're reading can I make a suggestion which may help us defensively. How about playing Emre Can at left back? He has played this role for Leverkusen and played it well. Since Flanno has been out of the team we have lacked discipline from the fullbacks, but Can would give us that extra protection against the pace and quality that Arsenal have up front. Can I also suggest playing a partnership of Toure and Sakho with Lucas protecting them in defensive midfield? Get the defence right and that will give the likes of Sterling, Lallana, Coutinho, Henderson etc the freedom to get forward and do what they do best.

Not trying to tell you how to do your job or anything ;)

Red Rum

Believable4 Unbelievable10

How about playing Emre Can FULLSTOP!!!

Agree14 Disagree1

There's more chance of aguero coming to liverpool than Rodgers playing a more defensive player at left wing back

Markovic scored and lfc won on Wednesday so automatically that same team will beat arsenal

Rodgers won't change no matter what the situation
Defence will always be absolutely shocking
Lovren will not be coached to fill those huge gaps he leaves
Liverpool don't make enough tacklers in bar Lucas
So for liverpool to win games. They have to hope lallana plays amazing every game and that he sets up sterling even though he's not a striker

That's about as simple as it gets

If u think I'm wrong just check the stats

Even with Sanchez or salah. The defence would stil be rubbish

Agree6 Disagree0

He would be wasted at left back, he is needed in centre midfield alongside Lucas so we don't have a great big hole there.

Agree7 Disagree1

19 Dec 2014 23:55:21
Already enough posts with people complaining about players being played out of position. And you've just gone and thrown a curve ball by suggesting Can to play left back haha!

I'm not convinced solving our defensive woes would be that simple. I'm also not sold on the whole if the defence is settled the attack will start firing. Could argue that if our attacks start firing it may ease some of the pressure at the back which may slowly lead to confidence coming back!

Personally feel it's in midfield that we lose out, tactically specifically. I can't defend the unforced errors from Lovren, Skrtel etc but, if you keep bypassing midfield and fronting defenders and putting pressure on them, then inevitably mistakes will happen, forced or unforced.

Here's to hoping that Bournemouth result can be the start of something. Not special, just something!

Agree2 Disagree2

Given the recent epiphony of the last two games where brendan surely to god has realised what the fans have been asking for all season, which is that we can only play wel with high intensity and pace, then surely it makes sense to do it again this weekend against the team it worked best against last season.

Goalie is anybodys guess, what an utter shambles.

Back four of manquillo, toure, sakho and moreno, two most sensible and effective centre backs who have done very little wrong in a red shirt i feel, and the two full backs are simply better than johnson or enrique.

Lucas in holding, as his form demands it. Can will bully arsenals weak and imbalanced midfield with lucas, and is great going forward, very direct and will tear them open. Lallana alongside Can, as he is industrial as well as skillful and has been playing far too well to be dropped. Coutinho at the tip of the diamond, simply as we've been better while he has been in the team the last two games.

Sterling and markovic up front, both have been playing well and will offer direct play and pace which will scare the hell out of arsenals makeshift defence hopefully.

Of course, none of this will happen, and of course the sideways passing of gerrard, henderson and allen will be brought back, lambert will be uselessly up front, lallana wil be on the wing even though it isn't his position, and the same calamtous back four of johnson, skrtel, lovren and enrique will come back, just to ensure we lose.

Agree7 Disagree0

20 Dec 2014 04:43:58
Ted Rum

If you could read mine. Emere Can played at LB against Valencia Ronaldo. Have a look at that game and he was terrible.

Toure and Sakho that should be last pair ain't it after all of your other combinations are proving to be terrible at the back.

Playing Toure over and over again would make us look a bigger joke in buying Lovern.

Agree0 Disagree3

{Ed001's Note - no one would look a joke for playing a combination that works, that comment makes no sense.}

20 Dec 2014 04:56:57
Ed01, Of Course it makes As players like Toure and Lambert for bought to cover and play when we suffers injuries.

People wanting Can to play must realize, Only one of Hendo or Can would feature alongside Lucas in a 3-4-3. Someone will have to sit out.

Agree0 Disagree4

{Ed001's Note - you are deluded. No one laughs at a winning team. You play the in form side, no matter how much they cost or what price you have paid for the alternative, it is when you don't do that people laugh.}

20 Dec 2014 05:22:11
Agreed ED01, but then then OP makes no sense.
Playing Can at LB? Just because he has a monster of a physique and looks good with a clean shave, other than I don't see any reason to play a midfielder at LB. He has no natural instinct of a full back.
Some here are throwing random names to play wherever left.

TBH Ed01, Our TC s*** As we overrated a lot of players and overpaid, now trying desperate to show outside world, we were right in bringing those.Else Lovern and Allen would never cement a place.

Agree0 Disagree4

{Ed001's Note - Allen was nothing to do with the committee so your point is nonsense and simply a lie. Rodgers is not trying to prove any committee right at all, you simply do not have a clue what you are talking about, he has been very vocal in his criticisms of the system, so why would you think he would try and prove it right?}

20 Dec 2014 06:09:25
The committee before and after included either BR all alone or under a group of players.
He is trying to save quiet a lot his own decisions.

Agree0 Disagree3

{Ed001's Note - irrelevant to Allen and irrelevant when Rodgers is clearly trying to put the blame on others in the committee for the signings made. He chooses the players he trusts, not the ones the committee signed.}

Big E, I agree that the weakest area is our midfield and if you read my recent posts you will see that I been going on about this, but there's nothing we can do until January. For me Can has the discipline and physicality to play LB. He has done it numerous times before and I feel he could do a good job for us. God knows what Harry's going on about, "looks good with a clean shave"?

Red Rum

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Dec 2014 09:25:58
Redrum

Could you tell me y do you need a player a LB, isn't Moreno available?

Agree1 Disagree0

Ed001

I guess then there's only one outcome if BR hates the committee system and the owners want it.

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - yep.}

Harry, Moreno reminds me of a young Johnson. Decent going forward but has a lot to learn defensively. If Flanno was fit I'd play him there.

Red Rum

Agree0 Disagree1

That's not to say I don't rate Moreno. I just think that in these big games we could do with more security at the back.

Red Rum

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Dec 2014 10:12:48
Red rum.

I agree that he doesn't track back enough. However he is not decent going forward but excellent who has been asked to stop advancing.

So how do you rate Marcelo, Alves, Coentrao, korolov, baines etc.

They All are poor in tracking back in fact Maecelo doesn't even bother to come back.

The difference is all those plays for a team who has one brilliant DM and their CO are equally good.

If you are asking for a Cole type player then there aren't many.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Dec 2014 11:15:43
I don't disagree Can could play there mate, I just think whilst Moreno is fit he should be a shoe in at wingback.
I see Can as more of a Yaya type powerhouse box to box player, however until I see more of him that is just somewhat of an ill informed opinion!

And I'm glad I'm not alone with the midfield opinion. It's fixable but not without Rodgers not being stubborn!

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 19:26:43
Quick question eds just can't make sense of it! Is origi going to come back in Jan or not?sorry can't find an answer.

Believable1 Unbelievable2

Doesnt seem to be a firm answer anywere mate tbh.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 22:06:06
Summer

Agree0 Disagree0

Maybe Allen should be left back and by that I mean left back in the changing room!!

Agree3 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 19:17:31
Hi eds.

You reckon Sheyi Ojo will get his chance in the 1st team soon? The lad looks the business imo. Lightning quick!

Cheers eds

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - he should do but I don't expect it to happen for a while, maybe the 3rd round of the FA Cup is a possibility, but I wouldn't hold out too much hope for him this season.}

If the was going to play it would have been against Bournemouth but maybe he will play the last game of the season like Ibe was only given his debut at the end of 12/13 season.

Agree0 Disagree0

The Bournmouth game was so important for Rogers saving his own skin, never mind the team needing a win, that there was never going to be a chance of any experimentation with the younger players. Kind of just how it is at the moment, we've not looked comfortable in any game I can remember this season, bar Spurs.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 18:13:33
If any of the EDD'S are around, what do we make of ORIGI joining in January.myself I just hope he can stop us conceding goals.

Believable3 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - it is odd that we didn't just pay the extra in the first place, rather than doing the Balotelli deal. He isn't going to save us, but at least we will have a forward who offers a goal threat when Sturridge is out.}

Sorry to ask Ed but I take it if OrIgi was to arrive in January, there wouldn't be any chance of the likes of Bony also?

Agree1 Disagree0

Infact forget that because the club have now denied Origi will be coming in Jan and said he will remain at Lille? Still a chance of another striker then.

Agree1 Disagree1

19 Dec 2014 17:59:54
I don't understand this site sometimes. After a long time Ed's 002 comes up with a name that Liverpool may look to complete in January and nobody bats an eyelid. But still people persist with Lacazette, Chech etc etc. These guys ain't coming people we have no money to spend. We have to shop in River Island for a season or two not Harrods please get used to it. Tolgay Arslan is the player ed's 002 mentioned and a very good one at that in a position we need to strengthen in. I hope we get him because from what I've seen of him he's a poor mans Mascherano but does an effective job much like Lee Cattermole. Tolgay, Hendo and Can in the middle would be an dynamic combo.

Believable0 Unbelievable4

19 Dec 2014 18:43:58
A poster asked the Ed his opinion on a certain position. Ed002 offered one potential player that he thinks would be a good buy.

That's it. He was asked his opinion and he gave it. Everyone has their own opinions on this site of who they think would be a good buy. They are equally entitled to theirs mate.

Agree6 Disagree0

I think you'll find puzzled red that Ed's 02's reply was more than an opinion of who would be a good buy for us. What I deciphered was that if the finances were right and we could make space for the German kid then we could do a deal. Maybe I've put 2 and 2 together and made 5 and I stand corrected if I have Puzzled Red. Ed's 002 maybe we could get some clarification here please?

Agree0 Disagree3

I asked the question, ed only said that he would be a good if she was buying. She also stated that he may end up at another prem side. I think you got the wrong end of the stick mate. DM is incredibly hard to fill with quality within our budget. We need to sell player but we're not very good at that apart from superstrars. Don't see us raising to much in way of funds for purchases. Getting rid of a few will save a few quid on wages though which has got to be good for the future. If they don't play or offer anything more than the youth can offer no point them sticking around.

Agree2 Disagree0

Why don't we just start giving Can game time at DM?

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Dec 2014 00:02:44
DM could be easily fixed within budget. It just depends on what DM you want, or what you want in a DM.
Someone like Alonso, Kroos etc who are the playmakers whilst also protecting the defence. A flashy controlling DM.
Someone a bit more old school. A makele or Hamann? Tactically fantastic. Strong tackler, distributes the ball simply.
Or finally a 'destroyer' I've seen it called. Someone that will put in real strong challenges, takes no prisoners type. A real old time DM, I see this as.

A makele or Hamann type is what we crave, we have plenty of playmakers further up the pitch. I can't suggest names off the top of my head but there is plenty out there!

Agree1 Disagree0

20 Dec 2014 04:02:28
Brendans Advocate, I think perhaps you just misunderstood Ed002's reply but I do agree with your earlier comments regarding use of the loan system though.

It may be the best way to bring in a GK and perhaps a DM too considering funds will be very limited.

Although it's worth noting that some loan signings can prove quite expensive. I seem to remember Sahin costing us a fair bit!

Agree1 Disagree0

20 Dec 2014 05:01:04
Big E

None of that playmakers drop deep and then turn the ball in a whisker. instead we pass around ourself and to the back 4.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 17:41:40
I'm no accountant but isn't the simple answer to our DM and GK problems to sell or loan out some players and with the money we save on wages/transfer fee(s) we receive loan a DM and a GK. This way were filling key areas with bodies and the financial outlay isn't as high a transfer would be. Oh i've just realized the caveat, clubs need to interested in our players! Oh well back to the day job. Good luck on Sunday redmen.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Good point Brendan's Advocate. Apart from Lucas and Borini, i really do not see us recouping much money from players like Balo, Aspas, Allen, Enrique, Jones, Migs. They will all be sold for half of what we paid for them which means huge losses. The owners will still need to put in more money to fund transfers for next season regardless of player sales.

Agree1 Disagree0

Yes, but that's if things like naming rights of the Stadium and Stands etc can be sorted, revenue in any capacity can increase 10 fold. LFC can't continue to mess with FFP rules like they have been to some extent, or else the Club will be hammered big time.

Agree3 Disagree1

Thats my whole point we can't rely on the owners to invest money into the club anymore. We are hemorrhaging money on a ridiculous scale and its not as if the owners haven't been generous with making monies available we have just spent it incorrectly. We have to shop in the bargain basement now i.e players like the guy from Hamburg whose out of contract soon and we can pick him up on the cheap and hope he makes a massive impact.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 19:31:31
There's a lot of confusion here. Whether we sell a player for a profit or a loss is irrelevant. What is relevant is how much money we raise to reinvest in other players.

A very simple example - player a) is bought for £1m, and sold for £2m. Great, we made a profit.

Player b) us bought for £10m and sold for £8m. Oh no, we made a loss!

However, with player a's sale we have £2m to spend and with player b's sale we have £8m to spend.

I have of course ignored other fees, agents etc,but my main point is that the absolute money raised through sales is more important for reinvestment purposes than whether we have made a profit or a loss.

So if we need, say, £40m to spend on the 2 key positions, as the OP has said, then Balo, Allen and Borini, for example, may well get us there regardless of making or losing money.

Agree3 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 17:28:26
Just a note that Rodgers was annoyed with false stuff being written about what's happening the dressing room maybe that's why he was like he was in the press conference. Give the bloke a break.

Believable0 Unbelievable6

Wrong! He made a comment that there are issues in the dressing room that he would not talk about in public after the Utd loss. HE made that comment and the press seized on it. The upteenth case of trying to have it both ways. He opens his big mouth and then is pissed that the media ran with it. Personally, I`m over his God aweful mouth because he is hopeless in that area.

Agree2 Disagree0

So everything in media is always right now redohio? Good luck with that one.

Agree0 Disagree0

Wrong again, Genius! BR made that comment and the media ran with it. HE made that comment and not the media and like the politician that he is, is now trying to undo his screw up by blaming said media (shocking as he has no fault in anything). Next time, pay attention, do your research or better yet don`t get into conversations you clearly have no idea of.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 15:06:45
Hey eds,

Any interest in the Celtic defender, I think Virgil VD?
If not, who is interested?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Arsenal and Manchester United both maintain an interest in him - but he is likely not first choice for either.}

Apparently he is a quality defender (according to a Celtic fan I know), can't say i've watched him play to be honest, but from youtube vids he looks like a David Luiz type centre back. A bit risky on the ball but decent defensively.

Red Rum

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 15:00:47
Do John Ruddy and Guillermo Ochoa seem viable targets for January, it's seems almost certain we'll go for a keeper and given cechs age and wage demands he'd seem an odd choice, plus Stoke would demand silly money for begovic, espespecially against a rival PL team they know are struggling. Who do the eds rate as better?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Try the search engine please.}

I don't think either are better than what we have even, Ruddy is a terrible keeper, begs the question as to what the scouts are actually up to if this is the best they could come up with. And if it is, should the club be investing in white sticks.

Agree0 Disagree0

I`m not sold on either of them especially Ruddy.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 13:06:36
A question for ed001 if he's around. What did you make of Rodgers press conference today. It only lasted 4 and a half minutes. It sounded petulant and childish to me.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - sorry mate I haven't seen it, I have been out most of the day with the boss.}

I thought exactly the same. Regardless of the length, his tone and body language was really strange. Can't quite work it out

Agree1 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 15:29:27
He has been spouting nonsense from months now.

Agree1 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 15:11:51
From what the eds have said he knows he's going so maybe the facade has dropped? The cliches and management speak has been worse over the past few weeks

Agree1 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 15:17:41
I've sent a newspaper report of it in to Other Liverpool Posts.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - WE are not going to post cut and paste articles from newspaper web sites - please stop sending them in.}

I've just seen it. It was an odd one and very subdued. The impression I get is that it felt like someone has had serious words with him.

Agree2 Disagree0

Jeez He can't win!

He waffles and is accused of talking too much, so he shuts up and now he's petulant!

ffs give it a rest !

Agree6 Disagree2

19 Dec 2014 16:25:36
Agree with Marshy, I watched it and could n't see anything wrong, precise and to the point. Stop picking on him for the sake of it. Save it , I am sure you will get your chance to knit pick soon enough

Agree3 Disagree1

Marshy. The issue is the vast majority of us are sick of the fish that comes out of his mouth. We would give him a break if he just kept to the facts and didn't tell the world how wonderful if was and that we're playing well when were clearly not. He just sat there looking like a child who had been told off and he was just sulking, pathetic

Agree3 Disagree3

19 Dec 2014 16:52:50
Brendan 's interview's remind me of Raffa's when he was infighting with the first yanks. I have been informed that Brendan is in a fight with the committee who select players to bring in and their choice of players already brought to the club which he did not want that maybe why we can't understand his team selections and his interviews having slagged Brendan off and having this information I think I may of been hasty in my thought on Brendan

Agree1 Disagree4

19 Dec 2014 17:09:41
It's clear he didn't want Mario. But then why sign him? Surely if the manager says 100% no the club won't sign him?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - That is simply not the case.}

Albeydered,

The Eds have already mentioned that the Committee members, which BR is very much part, each have equal rights to vote, and is consensus based.

This is an answer provided by Ed001's to a question I had about the Committee “the chaos was created by Rodgers' failing in the first place. Plus, if he had said he wanted to give some youth players a try and so didn't need so many players, then I am sure no one would have disagreed with that. Instead he pushed for the club to spend big with bigger promises that he is also failing with”.

Agree1 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 17:45:56
Ed002 - articles were being reproduced as recently as a couple of days ago, so that is a change of policy. The Telegraph is partially firewalled and so many fans will not get to read their articles. Perhaps one of the lesser used buttons in the menu bar should be re-allocated as Liverpool In Press and used to reproduce firewalled articles from the Times and Telegraph etc

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - copyright issues prevent us doing that mate.}

19 Dec 2014 18:20:15
Consensus means everyone has to agree .

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 18:21:25
Fair enough. Don't want the site injuncted.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - cheers mate, sorry.}

19 Dec 2014 17:45:00
So Ed002, are you saying that Rodgers did want Balotelli or that he had no choice but to say yes?

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 19:35:16
"He has been spouting nonsense from months now." - so have you Harry, but you're still around! We're one big happy family :)

Agree8 Disagree0

I don`t blame the commitee. I blame who thought it was a good idea to have a vote on a commitee as to who gets bought. I my 30 plus yrs of watching footie, I have NEVER heard of such a shambles at any club. Who ever that person is, should be fired. And if it was the owners who did this, then they deserve the blame for the chaos said shambolic commitee.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 13:53:33
I've worked out Brendan Rodger's press conference template win or lose. It reads: I thought young (insert player name) was outstanding today, followed by something about being technically superb, then appetite and hunger for the game, and finally something about a lot of changes over the summer to the squad.

Nailed it?

Believable13 Unbelievable0

19 Dec 2014 12:53:38
If the transfer committee want to help us they need to pull cech and laczette out of a magic hat!
Sell borini to top up the kitty and even balotelli.

Believable3 Unbelievable2

19 Dec 2014 13:43:35
people keep on about Cech , it won't happen, he is not young and won't be for free, so no resell value (what ever that means). Also why would Peter leave Chelsea, I know he is not first team, but he is on route to win a PL medal, probably a CL medal , and probably CC medal.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - And what about an FA Cup medal?}

19 Dec 2014 14:09:50
Tranmere rovers all the way after a tight final with chelsea in which a horrible keeper error from courtouis cost them the game. whilst cech just sits on the bench rolliing his eyes

Agree1 Disagree0

It's all well and good getting young players but you all so need the experienced players as well, which is where were going wrong.

Agree3 Disagree1

I also highly doubt Chelsea will win the CL. Read Madrid and Bayern are absolutely flying. Capitol One cup they have to get past us and then Tottenham which is hardly a given. FA cup hasn't even started for them yet for Prem teams.

Agree1 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 15:28:53
Jose could win all the three, He won with a mediocre Inter. And regarding CC, don't see Spurs reaching the final.

Agree0 Disagree2

A mediocre Inter?!

Ceasar, Zanetti, W.Samuel, Lucio, Maicon, Cambiasso, Motta, Sneijder, Milito, Eto'o etc!

His Inter Milan team were excellent. A lot of them were aging admittedly but they were a very experienced and solid team. Perfect for Mourinho's defensive and disciplined style.

Far from mediocre though mate.

Agree3 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 15:59:28
Ed002's Note - And what about an FA Cup medal
==================
You getting too greedy there Ed002 :), I don't think the Chelsea team ready to win the FA cup, another year of transition me guess

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 12:23:12
All the best to King Kenny in today's Hillsborough inquest. I'm sure his profound contribution to the families will never be forgotten. Can't be easy for him to re-live those days so just wanted to air some support.

Believable16 Unbelievable0

19 Dec 2014 10:12:42
Hi Ed's hope all is well on the run up to xmas, Slightly off liverpool topic but,

I recently read an article regarding money issues within the Russian league of all things, which stated the majority of the big earners (hulk, Witsel, etc) having to have their contracts cut short? But since. have not managed to find the article again. Just wondered if you knew anything of this?

Cheers

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - There are a considerable number of "overpaid" players in Russia (your examples of Hulk and Witsel are good and there are others (e.g. Valbuena, Movsisyan, Kuranyi and Ozbiliz) who are earning significant wages and bonuses).

The Russian Football Union has been trying to negotiate a salary cap (at the behest of the Government) but it is not being well received. The clubs are not in an Anzhi-type situation but would generally welcome a reduction in wages. Three Russian clubs (Zenit St Petersburg, Anzhi Makhachkala and Rubin Kazan) are subject to UEFA sanctions (similar in a way to Manchester City and PSG) and each wants that behind them.

The likely result will be that (a) a salary cap will be gradually introduced over perhaps a three year period, (b) a number of the higher paid players (such as those named above) will be offered a one of payment in exchange for a salary reduction but this may not be attractive to all; (c) a number of the higher paid players (such as those named above) will be sold in the summer.}

Well we might be able to afford hulk if they sell in roubles

Agree7 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 14:12:24
topical joke of the week *thumbs up*

Agree3 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 09:43:27
I for one wanted to see more of Markovic and felt he was being unfairly cast aside, but I have to say that I don't think he should start the next match. He's getting to grips with the speed and stamina required to play in England and having a much better impact than he was early on, but considering our for and that he's just had 90 minutes midweek, starting him vs Arsenal would be a mistake for me. I'd much rather see him as a reasonably early (55-60 minute) sub coming in with the remit to target Mertesaker and just leave him in the dust. If we somehow manage to reach the last third of the match in contention, the pace of a fresh Markovic and potentially Coutinho as well could panic and break them.

Believable2 Unbelievable2

I think Markovic did enough to deserve a start, he worked hard, attacked with intent and scored a sublime goal, I'd put him in instead of the rather pointless Joe Allen.

Agree3 Disagree0

Allen is NOT who we need right now BUT in my opinion, BR seems obssessed with possession hence, playing him when in reality, we need the high press and high energy players in the team especially vs the gunners who crumble when somone breathes on them. Allen should sit on the bench until we need to hold a result or regain control of midfield in a game. Can, arko, Sterling, Lallana, Couts are the players who should b playing right now.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 03:38:26
Ed002 a quick question if I may, if you were manager who would you sign to play DM who would realistically be available and what do you think of Lucas there?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Emre Can is certainly capable of playing that role and Kirikou played in a similar role for PSG on occasion - so he could certainly provide cover. If it were a player from outside to arrive that is both available and financially viable, the club could look to Hamburg's Tolgay Arslan - who may yet end up at another EPL side.}

Would any of Alex Song, Wanyama or Schneiderlin be an option and would you think they would fit? Lucas is solid and I like him, but I would think Liverpool would preferably have a more mobile DM that can also distribute the ball from the back. I really like Can too but perhaps needs a couple of years before holding midfield in the really big games, I think he's great right now as box to box like Henderson and part of a back three

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - No.}

Still not convinced that the club will let Lucas go. Brendan by now must have seen how important he is to the team and the likes of Can, Gerrard and Allen simply do not have the discipline to play there. We need someone like Matic to protect the defense and i'm sure the team's fortunes will improve significantly. Just look how badly Chelsea struggled against Newcastle, the only league game in which Matic did not play. The club should see sense and keep Lucas till the summer and then buy a quality replacement if the player himself wants to leave.

Agree1 Disagree2

19 Dec 2014 12:14:11
Indian

Agreed on the DM Role, but someone like Matic will cost somewhere near 25 mill now.
We had the opportunity and Ed01 was crying to get someone there like Medal.
Lucas ll be tested against a strings of Arsenal attackers who plays through the middle.

Agree1 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 14:09:43
thanks Ed, never heard of Tolgay so will keep an eye out for him.

Agree0 Disagree0

Thought I saw Arslan linked to Arsenal a while back, but could be well wrong on that. Anyone else like Jack Cork or is it just me? Thought he was excellent last year at Soton holding and if memory serves he seemed to play more than Wanyama last season.

For me, I'd probably just start playing Can there. He's certainly capable of it and I think at this point in his career he might need to start settling down into a specific position and make it his own although he is quite capable in any number of areas.

Agree0 Disagree0

If we sold Lucas and kept Allen, I'd be gutted. Lucas is a good defensive midfielder who gets stuck in and shields the back 4. IF they sold him we would be left with no specialist in that area. Really the club should sell Allen as he offers nothing.

Agree0 Disagree0

Agreed, RDL! He plays CB for the German U-21`s and can play almost anywhere in midfield and even LB. His appetite for the game is awesome and IMO, a coach worth his salt should be able to find a place for him on the team sheet, Not saying he should start every game BUT should be playing more regularly than he is now.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 08:04:40
The performance against Bournemouth was good.
Why can't some people just say that?
It was a 1000% improvement on recent games.
I was looking for anything positive.
Well we got something positive and people are still moaning.
It's not about Rodgers in or out
It was about Liverpool getting a much needed win.

Believable12 Unbelievable2

The upturn in form has been to the fact Markovic Sterling Coutinho and Lallana have played in the same team they add that bit of explosiveness that you have lacked players that are prepared to run at and in behind the defense and if Rodgers has the b. . to drops Gerrard and Skrtel and play Can and and Lucas just behind that front four and Sakho in defence then you will score goals and concede less

Agree8 Disagree0

Bournemouth rested 4 players, they are also in the division below.

Agree10 Disagree6

19 Dec 2014 07:52:35
Just saw a stat which is shockingly awful but not a great surprise. BR has been at the helm of our great club in 122 (competitive) games and we have conceded 154 goals.He has also spent 63 million pounds on defenders and a goalkeeper (who he has dropped).This doesn't include the loan fees for Cissokho and Manquillo. This equates to 1.26 goals conceded per game.And he said defending was easy and refused help from a defensive coach!

YNWA.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

No no, according to BR, the problems we have defensively are "un-coachable".

I have never heard such a ridiculous statement from a coach!

Agree4 Disagree0

That is why IMO, he is simply NOT interested in coaching the defence which is why he will b sacked mainly due to the money he has wasted on defenders . Yet he says if the defence is bad, it`s not his fault as nothing else ever is.

Agree2 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 07:37:37
hi fellow fans

would you guys consider winning the carling cup and Europa league a successful season for us considering where we are right now?
funny, how we were aiming to win the title last season and have gone back to fans forced to just being satisfied with some cup triumph!

Believable3 Unbelievable4

19 Dec 2014 08:16:27
Would I take that along with a 6th place finish?
Yeah, probably.

Agree3 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 08:54:18
Absolutely, it's all about winning trophies with added bonus of the CL next season

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 09:35:30
Successful? No, but it would certainly be an improvement over expectations at the moment and maintain our CL status for next season, which would be nice as well. So not a disaster by any stretch, but not a success

Agree2 Disagree0

It would be an ok achievement. I don't see it happening though.

Agree0 Disagree1

19 Dec 2014 09:50:21
Yeah I'd call it a success because I have only seen liverpool lift ine trophy inymy years as a liverpool supporter

Agree0 Disagree0

I said at the start of the season that winning the league was out of the question.

I said top 4 finish and getting out of the champions league group would be a success.

Our main goal has got to be making sure we qualify for the champions league again.

Agree1 Disagree0

This season is already a right-off since we did not even make it out of a relatively easy group in the UCL. The league cup is just a poor consolation for a club of Liverpool's stature when the aim was clearly to challenge for the UCL and premier league where Brendan has failed spectacularly. Right now finishing in the top4 or winning the Europa league so that the club is back in the UCL next season is vital and maybe winning the league cup as a consolation prize will do. But Brendan should not be in charge next season regardless of what happens over the next 6 months.

Agree3 Disagree1

If that happened, I hope we don't get arrogant and refuse to look at the problems.

Agree2 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 11:51:46
Don't see how it wouldn't be? Fair enough is a slim chance of both happening but even if we only won the Europa league it would be successful.

Trophy = check
CL next season = check

Saying that even with winning those would say BR would need to start taking him help/advice or go

Agree0 Disagree0

Even if we win the CC and not be top4, BR will still be let go. That can never make up for how poor he has been on many other fronts.

Agree0 Disagree0

Winning five games in a row would be a success, beating Arsenal would be a success at the moment LOL!

Agree0 Disagree0

I`ll take that, Jacko!

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 06:13:54
Ok, so it was a much better performance vs Bournemouth but LFC should be beating these team anyway so no point in getting to excited. If we beat Arsenal on Sunday then there could be some room for optimism but their form is as also very bad.

I do not think we are going to get away playing 3 at the back vs Arsenal and if Rodgers does go that route then we will be beaten.

Markovic and Sakho should be starting. Not sure what we should do with our midfield as we are so poor in that department. Why is Can not being given a run, the only way he will improve is to get minutes on the pitch.

I for one am going to take the win midweek with a pinch of salt. Let's see if we can beat Chelsea in the semi final.

Believable4 Unbelievable1

Same here!

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2014 01:01:31
A bit early maybe but I expect LFC to start winning consistently in the new year.

Hopefully Sturridge will remain fit and with Sterling and a fit balotelli this could be enough for a late push to top four.

LFC need pace upfront, we rely upon it. Pushing defences back and getting one on one. Sturbridge is sorely missed.

Wishful thinking, yes definitely, but hopeful. Lallana, Markovic and Balotelli to come good.

Believable13 Unbelievable1

 
Change Consent