Liverpool Banter Archive February 17 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

17 Feb 2014 19:27:47
Nice to see both Ilori and Suso playing so well for their loan teams. Both are playing major parts in Grenanda's and Almeria's survival in the top flight.

This will only strengthen them for next season, and in turn strengthen us.

Really hope they get their chance next year. If not another season loan would be better than selling either of them on. They both have great ability and will only get better. Youth is on their side so if they are to be loaned again, a team that could accommodate both would be very welcome.

Out of all our loanees I think these two have the best chance of breaking through.
I feel all of Reina, Assiaidi, Robinson and Wisdom wil all leave this summer. The only reason I include Wisdom is his size, his favoured position is centre half and I just don't think he will get that chance at Liverpool. I feel Borini could get another chance next season. He's done fairly well at Sunderland since Poyet arrived.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

His 6'1, same as Carra. His going nowhere.

Agree0 Disagree0

I;ve stood next to Wisdom at a friends bbq. He's not 6'1

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Feb 2014 12:27:37
Andre Wisdom is 186cm tall or, 6ft 1inch. Whichever you prefer. The myth of him being short came about because he was 5ft 11inches when he made his first team debut. You have to consider that men don't stop growing until they are 21 years old. Martin kelly grew 3 inches in the same period of time and Ryan Shawcross apparently grew 5 inches between 20 and 21 years old resulting in serious muscular issues. Not sure how true the Shawcross thing is as it's just a regurgitated story my mate told me, but Wisdom is not short anymore. He is the same height as Carragher, taller than Puyol, Toure, Collocini, Cannavaro etc. Plus he's built like a train.

YNWAdam

Agree0 Disagree0

Bobatron, were you maybe standing on a box? LFC website states Wisdom is 1.86m. 6'1" is 73". Which is 73x2.54cm = 185.4cm. ?

Agree0 Disagree0

Thinking long term Sahko and Ilori would be ideal partnership. Ilori is like agger but waaay faster and right footed. Hope he realises his potential.

Agree0 Disagree0

Maybe Bob was on the top step? ;0)

Agree0 Disagree0

No I was stood next to him on some ''crazy paving'' he's not 3 inches taller than me.

Agree0 Disagree0

I would maybe go with YNWA Adam's explanation, but in the summer last year, he was definitely on a par with me height wise. Maybe that tesco finest beef burger gave him that protein burst he needed?

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 15:49:07
Could have won the game easily if only sturridge played how he usually plays. Hope he come backs stronger and waiting for johnson to replace cissokho.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Johnson really needs to improve his performances to get in our side now. I think it will be the bench at best first of all.

Agree0 Disagree0

I saw a reply from you to an earlier post from me on Glen Johnson Ed001. I mentioned how we could have trouble shifting Johnson and you replied that he only has 1 year left on his contract.

Do mean, that he would have 1 more year left on his contract FROM this summer?

I just think with his wage, no one would want him and we probably will have to keep him until he becomes a free agent.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - All contracts end in the summer. So yes.}

I'm hoping that it was Johnson's mysterious injury that has made him play like he has been, and when he gets back in he will be a different player. But I can't see what injury he could have had that has healed itself so quickly? Maybe he got pulled from the squad for poor effort, who knows, but I hope he comes back better.

Agree0 Disagree0

Keep dreaming johnson would walk back into the team over flanno
Brendan loves an attack minded fullback and cissokho is more solid defensively

Agree0 Disagree0

Laziness isn't an injury lol
I'm hoping flanno and Kelly do enough between now and summer so that we can sell Johnson.

Agree0 Disagree0

When Glen was injured earlier in the season, he was really missed. I have no idea whether niggling injuries have played a part in his lack of form of late, but when playing well, he has to be first choice RB. Ok, he's not the best defensively, but adds so much going forward that he keeps the opposition on the back foot. We love Flanno, but his delivery, as seen on Sunday, is not a patch on Johnson, or Kelly for that matter.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - he was missed by who?}

Hi Ed001,

I guess the manager missed him back in October:

Quote: Speaking last month Rodgers was eager to get his first choice right-back back out on the pitch admitting his side have missed him in his absence.

"Glen is the type of player you don’t realise what you’re missing until he’s not in the team, " he said.

"He was outstanding against Manchester United so it will be great when we get him back. He’s got the cast off his foot now and he’s working hard to be back in the next few weeks."

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - you expected him to say something along the lines of 'Johnson is rubbish, bloody glad he is injured as I can put that kid in instead of him' perhaps?}

Not seen him offer much forward as of late either mate. Used to be able to look past his shoddy defending because he was dangerous on the wing. But he offers little going forward now and he's even worse tracking back.
But to be fair to him he is a lot better at left back or in a wing back position with 3 central defenders. But is he really worth the wages we pay him?

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Feb 2014 12:43:09
Are you sure we missed Johnson? Or did we just miss a right back? At the time of his last injury Flanagan and Kelly were not match fit, McLaughlin was deemed not ready, so we had to settle for playing centre backs like Wisdom and Toure out of position. You may also recall at the time Rodgers was experimenting with a 3-5-2 formation making the lack of a right back even more glaringly obvious. We didn't miss Johnson, we missed all 3 of our first choice right backs. You don't see Rodgers making the same "we miss Johnson" comments now he has Kelly and Flanno fit. Simply put, that's because they are both better defenders than him. I see people saying Johnson is great going forward which makes up for his poor defending but he has 8 goals in 160 games. that's a goal every 20 games, and roughly 2 a season if he stays fit. He also has just 20 assists which is an assist every 8 games and roughly 5 a season, again should he avoid any injuries. If you check out his stats for each of his 5 seasons at the club you'll also see that his attacking potency is declining with his best attacking return coming in his first season 2009/10. So far this season for example, he has 0 goals and 1 assist in 18 games. For a so called attacking full back, that is awful. In fact, in less games and despite being considered more defensive, Cissokho and Flanagan have both contributed towards the same or more goals than Johnson this season. They've been far better defensively as well. For me, Johnson is just a large wage being paid out to an aging player who is now our 5th choice fullback behind Kelly, Flanno, Cissokho and Enrique. Johnson also has the worst passing accuracy out of every defender in the squad this season as well. He's not good enough because he doesn't focus and he's lazy. The only thing annoying about it is that if he tried he could be as good as the likes of Ivanovic and Zabaleta.

YNWAdam

Agree0 Disagree0

Spot on Adam. He's been poor for a while and this injury isn't the reason.
I'm hoping Kelly and flanno both produce the goods and stay fit for the remainder of the season so it's an easy decision for Rodgers.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 15:15:26
How ya doing Eds. Bit quite on here of late other than the discussions on the peno not given yesterday. Are you feeling positive that we can push on now with only focus and cement top 4 placing? You think we can and should aim higher than 4th?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - I don't see that we should aim to do anything other than win the next game and see where we end up. I really don't like this talk of aiming for a specific position. It affects players mentally, increasing pressure for no real reason. I really couldn't care less about 4th, if we aren't winning the league then it is simply never going to matter to me the position, so long as the team is looking better than it was the previous season.}

European nights at anfield though ed. can't say you don't miss them. Last year when Zenit came to anfield it was magic and reminded me what we are missing out on. i'm desperate for more tbh

Agree0 Disagree0

Hello ED01, so if we don't win the league you couldn't care less if we finish 4th or 5th?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - not really, no. Does it really make a difference? I don't like being in Europe by a back door.}

Wow that's incredibly naive Ed, if we don't win the league (which isn't going to happen) it's extremely important to finish in the top 4

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - no it is not, except financially. It certainly won't affect anything else. Nothing naive, that is insulting to suggest I am naive, it is simply that I don't like finishing second.}

The fall out if we don't get CL this season could be huge though Ed! We'd all rather win, but we will be further away next season if we finish 5th than we would be if we finish 4th.

We would be less attractive to top level players, have less money to buy them, potentially lose Suarez. whilst 4 other teams pull away that little bit further from us.

It is a shame that finances are so important these days, but unfortunately CL has such a huge financial effect that we simply have to qualify to have the resources to kick on.

Ash

Agree0 Disagree0

But better players will want to come to us, and 4th is a better way of making progress than finishing 5th, otherwise how are we going to get that title?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - but I won't care, nor will I celebrate mediocrity.}

It's not meant as an insult Ed simply an observation. As you say financially it's hugely important but also in terms of keeping players and attracting players it's crucial.
I wish it weren't the case.
I wish winning a trophy were more important than finishing fourth because winning trophies should be what it's all about but the reality is champions league football has become more important and that's just the way it is

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I wasn't asked that, so your whole point is irrelevant.}

Perhaps Ed001 is being subjective here? I think he meant that he doesn't want the team he supports to finish second best. It is what he WANTS.

I agree winning trophies is what the game is all about, but if we can't win it, we have to make sure we get the next best thing, which is going as far as we can and continued improvement on the way.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - exactly mate.}

Glad that is cleared up now Ed001. Hopefully the other posters understand what you mean now.

Agree0 Disagree0

No1 jumps from 7th to winning the league. But we ARE heading towards where we want to be. IMO I believe if we had defenders we'd of walked it this season

Agree0 Disagree0

Hello again Ed01, I have agreed with approx 90% of your comments in the past 6 months or so (that's a lot more than all other Eds by the way) but can't agree with you here, at the end of the day only 1 club can win the league when around 3 or 4 think they have a divine right to win it and about the same number realistically have a chance to win it, there is a lot more than the position at stake, money (as you said) attracting players to improve our chances of winning the league in the future, building our fan base further etc etc.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - and? I don't see that has any relevance to my answer. Unless you all think we should just aim for 4th each season and then wonder why the players all struggle the moment we hit the top and fall away? Just win the next game and the position will take care of itself.}

I think there has been a misunderstanding here, or maybe I am wrong, but come the end of the season, Ed0001 will be happy if the players get the highest possible position they can. If that is fourth, then I don't think the Ed will be unhappy with it. Am I right in thinking this?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - yep.}

No Ed, I don't think we should aim for 4th at all, but as Mick Jagger said" you can't always get what you want",
I bet the got his fair share though,

Agree0 Disagree0

Aim for 1st and see where we end up I say! We are in the mix with under 1/3rd of the season left so no reason not to.

Agree0 Disagree0

Correct me if I am wrong, but I think Ed001 is just saying finishing 4th is nothing to shout about. I see his point, you don't look back ten years and think "Remember when we finished 4th, that was a good year." You remember cup wins and titles. No one remembers the losers. Also that setting targets only adds pressure, if you just focus on small goals (eg winning the next game) the bigger goals take care of themselves.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - exactly, Paisley never once set out to win the league ever. He set out to win the next game.}

Don't agree again ed (your average is reducing by the minutes)Paisley will obviously have set out to win the league, he just didn't say so

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - not true, and I would believe his word over yours.}

Ed also said there is no difference to him in finishing 4th or 5th, come on get real will yous all agreeing or justifying that comment, ed, respect as I hinted earlier but can't agree at all, peace!

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - what is the difference to me? None. We have achieved nothing finishing 4th. I am embarrassed by people who seem to think mediocre finishes are worth anything.}

I see where ed is coming from Yes champions league is good and great finishing fourth from this position with only league games to play is still abit of a let down why shouldn't we aim for the league as much as it might be a step to far this season we shouldn't just aim for the top 4 once the europa league starts again we should kick on from spurs and focus on the league

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree that finishing second third or fourth is nowhere. Except that if we finish in any of those positions then to achieve that from seventh shows great progress has been made and the bonus is that we get into European competition. I don't believe that is the back door though. It is the set down qualification rules. The biggest bonus though in today's game is that financially it helps us to be stronger which opens up opportunities to sign strong players.

Agree0 Disagree0

ED01, Sgt red, piledriver, Jamesy & AG nobody is saying aim for 4th, we should aim for first but so do all the big clubs and only 1 can win it. Simple question to all of yous, would you prefer to finish 4th or 5th?
ED01, I don't for 1 minute think you are niave ( but Chris Tamworth I understand why you said it) but I do think you are being stubborn. And you think Paisley didn't set out to win the league? Niether of us know what was in Paisleys mind but i'd bet my bottom dollar he set out to win the league EVERY year he was in charge, after all he did say that LFC existed to win trophies.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - yes, Liverpool existed to win trophies, he bought players that he felt were good enough to win them, but you don't set out to win the league at the start of a season. They expected to win the league, but it was never set out as a target. Ask anyone involved back then, it was all about the next game, not the title. Once you start taking your eyes off the present and beginning focusing on the possible futures is when you drop silly points.}

Another thing boys, we finished FOURTH in 2003/4, qualified for champions league and won it, tell me yous would forfeit that because we never qualified by finishing first, and if any of you say you would I've got one thing to say to yous B******S

Agree0 Disagree0

@Alanhuyton

That 2003/04 season would not have been regarded as a success. The Ed is talking for the present, not what the Champions League offers in the future. I get it, I don't understand why you don't?

Agree0 Disagree0

Piledriver, 2003/4 season was a means to an end, and end that saw us win the champions league and keep big ears forever, would you now prefer that we finished 5th, 6th, 7th etc in 2003/4 or what?
I would like to point out that as I said at the start of this thread that I have agreed with approx 90% of what ED01 has said over the past 6 months or but not on this occasion.
Some people on here really do have to stop treating Eds like gods that are never wrong.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed, I can't believe you believe what you are saying, to clarify, in your words

They (the club) expected to win it

You yourself aim to win it (Not settle for mediocrity)

But it was never set out as a target

Total contradiction, you aim and expect but do not set out to win it?

We could go on all week at this rate so that's my final say on this matter, let the other posters decide, I expect a reply from you trying to justify your comments because I have learned that you are stubborn. I suppose its a bit like expecting Howard Webb to come out and admit he got it wrong on Sunday, not going to happen is it!

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - it is not a contradiction, it seems to be going over your head this whole concept of aiming only to win the next game. It is not as difficult to understand as you are making it seem.}

To be fair to the ed here Alan, Rodgers has actually come out and proposed a target of 76 points for 4th. An average of two per game.
That never happened in the past mate, because it was never possible to say that with such precision.
You're twisting the argument there.
What once was failure, is now success.
That's the point for me.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree in a way Ed. I agree that if we don't win anything then there is nothing in particular to get excited about. But I do think it is crucial to finish top 4. If we want to win the league, we need the best players to suit the club, a great manager and a great mentality. I believe right now, we have two of them things, all we need is a couple of more quality players. These quality players want Champions League football, and if we get 4th, we can provide this for them. From there, we can build a team capable of winning the league and other trophies, which is where your point comes in. Fair enough, 4th place only really provides us with those European nights we crave and we don't win silverware for doing so, but it gives us a platform to push on and win those trophies. As you say taking things on a game by game basis is the best way of doing this, but I think it is important to get 4th place as well. But yes, it is nothing compared to winning a trophy.

Hope I haven't misunderstood the argument but that's just how I interpreted it.
Cheers,

Agree0 Disagree0

Bayern last season in the Champions league, they humiliated Arsenal at the Eimerites (spelling) then only went out with an attitude not to get defeated and almost snatched defeat in the jaws of victory so psychologically it is wrong to set a long term target.
Every season you see a West Brom, Swansea, Southampton, Sunderland go on a very good run and then get to February and die away.
Spurs for about 3 seasons in a row lost their bite after January, when a title looked a possibility and didn't even make the champions league.

Agree0 Disagree0

Juicer I am twisting nothing mate, I said from minute 1, 4th was better than 5th, Ed said it didn't matter were we finished if it wasnt 1st, are you telling me you agree with that? a simple yes or no will suffice.

Agree0 Disagree0

I'd rather we competed to win the European Cup of course mate.

Agree0 Disagree0

Top of the league would be amazing! But champions league is the bread and butter.
Sorry but that's how it is.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 13:35:38
I'm intrigued to know why Stevie G should have been sent off - according to some people on here.

He makes a tackle, narrowly missed the ball and makes contact with the player. It wasnt cynical, ie, to stop a counter attack and it wasnt dangerous - and it wasnt as if he had made two or three other fouls after his booking - it was slightly mistimed that's all.

I appreciate you have to tread carfully but just because you have been booked you can still give away a free kick without getting another yellow.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Gerards tackle should of been a 2nd yellow, take your red tainted glasses off

Agree0 Disagree0

Gerard should never have been booked in the first place, Webb has got something against Liverpool, it was 15mins into the game and his first offence, handing out 3 yellows to Liverpool within the first 20mins, he's a joke of a ref, why wasn't podolski yellowed for that terrible tackle on flano? Oh yes because he's not a Liverpool player! He made another bad tackle towards the end if the game to that again wasn't deemed a yellow. So if you want to be objective pod should have been sent off aswell.

Agree0 Disagree0

Robertosthemainman ;


. is every foul a yellow then?

Agree0 Disagree0

If Gerrard hadn't already had a yellow, I can near guarantee he would have gotten one for that tackle. Webb was card happy yesterday and (unfortunately) set an early precedent for when a yellow was to be handed out. If there was a fault then for me that was the biggest one- he started carding people way, way too early in the match and in general the flow of the game was non-existent.

Agree0 Disagree0

Robertosthemainman, not every foul is a booking otherwise every game would end up a shootie,

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 18:16:24
Stevie second foul could've easily have earned him a yellow card had he not been already on one.

I could same the same about Nacho Monreal though.

Agree0 Disagree0

Webb started carding people way to early for little fouls. Then in the second half, he probably realized this and stopped carding. It was just a poorly refereed game by Webb.

He also forgot to card the serial offenders, Podolski, Koscielny and Arteta.

I agree that it would definitely have been a yellow if SG had not been carded in the first half.

Agree0 Disagree0

ROBERTOSNOTHEMAINMAN

Arteta in that case should have gone along with ox and Monreal.
No red tinted glasses, common sense.

Agree0 Disagree0

Robertosthemainman you have been banging on about this sending off all day. Every post about the game has you in the thread somewhere saying it should have been a second yellow.

I actually replied to your post earlier when you asked the question should Gerrard have been sent off but you keep bringing it up.

Yes it could have been a second yellow but we should have had a second penalty so it evens out.

Believe it or not your team won yesterday and are in the quarter finals of the cup. Why not focus on that on your own page rather than the Liverpool banter page.

Typical Evertonian more interested in Liverpool than their own team.

Agree0 Disagree0

In my opinion it could have gone either way. He lunged in on Ox but no malicious intent, if Ox was on a run centrally or cutting inside it would be a definate yellow and the end of SG's game IMO, but as he was wide and we had cover he got away with it.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 13:32:09
Our defence is the biggest concern, and what we should focus on for the summer transfer window.
Most people would agree that Brendan Rodgers considers our best defence is Glen Johnson, Martin Skrtel, Daniel Agger and Jose Enrique.
They're cover is Martin Kelly, Kolo Toure, Mamadou Sakho and Aly Cissokho. With Jon Flanagan competing with all full backs for a starting role.
On the face of it, that's a solid structure but it has it's flaws. Liverpool's supposed favoured line up is too attacking.
Each player has the potential to carry the ball into the opponents half with a surge of power and pace. Each player has the potential to score, Skrtel and Agger from set pieces or Johnson and Enrique cutting in.
This is good but it leaves our defence in a weak position. Not every time do these players surges or attempts at scoring lead to goals, they usually lead to an opponents counter attack. Applying the pressure where the player that just attacked should be.
As well as that Martin Skrtel has a tendency to drop deep and tackle the player when they are going to shoot instead of doing it before hand. Allowing the counter attack to become more of a threat by the opponents team pushing up the field in support.
Also, our defence is incredibly injury prone, Johnson, Agger, Enrique, Kelly and Sakho are expected to pick up an injury throughout a season.
Which leaves our most reliable defence as Flanagan, Skrtel, Toure and Cissokho, the defence that played the last four premier league games.

First of all I think we should start with full backs, take from the big clubs that are currently not playing quality players. Micah Richards or Toby Alderweireld for right back and Ashley Cole or Fabio Coentrao for left back. In these four players you are looking at a better defensive full back than Glen Johnson and Jose Enrique respectively. Providing quality competition for a starting spot, just like we have in our centre backs.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Johnson is poor has been for years

Agree0 Disagree0

Sakho has not been brought in to cover.

Agree0 Disagree0

We could have trouble shifting Johnson.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - only another year left on his contract.}

LB: Enrique seems to be injury prone but is a very good defender, Sissokho can do an average job but doesn't offer a huge amount of attack or defence.

RB: Johnson looks very bored and I think he was taking his place for granted, he has the talent and experience to be the player we need but needs to improve if he wants to keep his place. Kelly seems injury prone but has the potential to be better than Johnson if he can hit a run of form.

Flanno can play both sides and has suprised everyone, he is consistent, confident, energetic and a great defender. Need another player like him in the summer, just hope he can keep it up.

CB: Skrytle is a brilliant defender but his box defending is very questionable, all this grabbing of players is going to get noticed one day and he will cost us points if he doesn't stop. Agger has always been injury prone but is probably our best defender, just needs to get back into the swing of things however once again, he isn't great at defending in the box. Sakho looks brilliant and in his first season has done quite well, just hope he can shake this injury off and become a rock for us. Toure is a perfect replacement for Carra, he has done us proud most of the season but has been unlucky to conceed those 2 goals, its a bummer but a man of his experience should be able to overcome that and not loose confidence, 1 more mistake and I think he will be dropped as we cannot afford that at this stage of the season.

Agree0 Disagree0

I don't think we would have trouble selling Johnson, I just don't think (much like Reina) we'll get much for him. Maybe 4M or thereabouts if we're lucky?

Agree0 Disagree0

It doesn't matter who is at the back,
They have all been tried, as a unit they
are not good enough they on average concede 2 a game.

Agree0 Disagree0

I would also point out that Liverpool has basically brought in the replacement of Reina, Carragher and Agger with Mignolet, Toure and Sakho.
Arguably the best defensive players we had at the club. So time will tell if we get a Johnson, Skrtel or Enrique replacement in the next transfer window.
Obviously it is our defence that is holding us back in the Premiership. Suarez and Sturridge are the two top goalscorers, Gerrard has the most assists, Coutinho has the most clear chances and Henderson has the most interceptions. So attack and midfield is solid.

Agree0 Disagree0

Skrtel can not read the game to save his life, takes up poor positions, is slow. He will be gone this summer, he is NOT in BR's starting 11 if all fit.

Agree0 Disagree0

Skrtel needs someone vocal beside him to dictate the positions he takes up because, he drops all of the time (last week for Arsenal Goal) comes across at bad times (Man City away springs to mind instantly) and isn't so dominant in the air or quick enough to compensate for these flaws.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 13:20:58
Gents, I have a day off work and I'm bored, lol.

So, just for fun.

You are getting married next week and have to choose 2 best men, who would you choose from the following.

A) Liverpool player/manager past or present.

B) Famous person (non-sporting)

Like I said, i'm bored, lol

Believable0 Unbelievable0

A; defo Carra because at least if he says anything bad in his speech about me, 99% won't understand him lol
b; Eddy Murphy because his speech is bound to be a riot and his laugh cracks me up

Agree0 Disagree0

Steven Gerrard/Stephen Fry

Agree0 Disagree0

Love that answer Simon. I have heard even Scousers don't understand Carra, lol.

Agree0 Disagree0

Well I'm Irish Dags so by the end of the night we'd all be talking gibberish anyway ha ha

Agree0 Disagree0

Would have to be Razor as he is a nut job and would be gold. 2nd would have to be hugh Heffner and pray that he would bring the playboy bunnies along with him

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 16:05:58
I've met gary Maccallister in Leeds a few times(Loves oporto bar), he's a great laugh and has time for everyone. So would go with him based on personal experiences.

Famous person. I'd probably have to go with Jim Jefferies, as a comedian I think he's brilliant + could probably throw a brilliant batchelor party

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 18:16:59
1) Rafa Benitez

2) Sir Patrick Stewart.


Yes, I am odd.

Agree0 Disagree0

(1) Dietmar Hamann, I've met the bloke and he's a top bloke.
(2) non football, Doug Stanhope, US comedian and drunken shambles. Funniest comedian since Bill Hicks.

And here's a question back, who would be the worst? I would say Tim Lovejoy. He's a complete person.

Agree0 Disagree0

1) Bob Paisley because he was sheer class by any definition.
2) Chris Rock, although I'm not sure Bob would have approved.

Agree0 Disagree0

Interesting, lol

Agree0 Disagree0

John terry, ryan Griggs. I didn't really want to get married

Agree0 Disagree0

Haha lovin that reply Rob b!

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 12:40:12
Joe Allen played well yesterday. He looked sharp, made some good interceptions and was willing to get stuck in. He also never panics when surrounded by opposing players- he just calmly waits until a pass becomes available, and then plays it. He looks a really decent player to me.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Finally, someone who REALLY watched the game. Allen was very composed in possession and BARELY lost possession regardless of who was around him. He`s great at doing the small things and that`s why NEVER gets the credit he deserves atimes.

Agree0 Disagree0

I have to agree with you both, we have only seen glimpses of JA at his best. Will only get better imho. Best years are ahead of him too, he reminds me of a young Paul Scholes and if he turns out to be half as good I'll be happy with that.

Agree0 Disagree0

He will be a good player in time and if he gets a good run injury free. Not sure if he will be the same level as Scholes but I think he will come good.

Agree0 Disagree0

I also agree. Seen plenty of comments saying he was terrible and I really couldn't understand them. It left me wondering if I'd watched the right game as I thought he was very good!

Agree0 Disagree0

I also agree he just needs to adjust to injuries stay fit and become vital to our team

Agree0 Disagree0

I've been one of his biggest critics, but he played well yesterday.

Agree0 Disagree0

Allen at the minute reminds me of Henderson before he went up a level, is doing a steady job in midfield but not taking games by the scruff of the neck at this moment in time. I think once he hones the qualities needed he will go up a level. Hopefully that will start next season of even better before!

What I want to see from Joe is a bit more muscle on him as he works his socks off but is frequently outmuscled when trying to regain possession, forward incisive passes and the confidence to beat a man going forward. He has great feet, workrate and balance so he is not far off and has ample base qualities.

Agree0 Disagree0

Joe Allen offers something the others in midfield don't. He's not flash in possession but keeps the ball moving with a lot of short, sharp passes often under pressure from the opposition.
His movement off the ball, trying to create an angle to receive a pass often goes unnoticed.
His style of play is similar to the current 'Barcelona' style which we know Brendon Rodgers is an admirer of.
I believe he has the technical ability to succeed, BR must know what his attitude is like. In time, if he can improve his final ball, finish off the chances he has been missing he will come good. Hopefully!

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 12:27:08
Hi Eds,

I see young Coady scored and got MOTM yesterday for sheff utd. I know is a big step up from that level to prem, but do you think he has what it takes and also what are the clubs views on him?

thanks

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - I have always liked Coady, he has the ability, but he needed to add some experience. I do feel he can make it at Prem level, though he needs another season out on loan, in the Championship, in my opinion. The club like his attitude and have always held high hopes for him, though he was never seen as the 'Next Gerrard' like he was sometimes referred to.}

Eds and reds,
I see him as the next Lucas Leiva or perhaps Jordan Henderson. A holding midfield player with an engine and a love for this club.
Perhaps he could be referred to as the next Gerrard, looking at the role Gerrard is currently playing in the team.

Agree0 Disagree0

Could be a good but not spectacular squad option/utility player after a year or 2 of successful loans. Flanno has proved in recent weeks that lads from the accademy can make it with the right attitude, so fingers crossed for coady. We need people in the squad who are there because they want to be and not just for the wages and coady would be one of them.

Agree0 Disagree0

Thanks Ed001, I have heard great reports about the lad so here is hoping. Great seeing a few of the academy lads getting a go. When you see Sterling, ibe, flano and texi getting a go and doing well the future seems bright. Hopefully Coady will get a chance and get added to this list.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I think he will get a chance, I just hope he takes it, as he certainly has ability.}

17 Feb 2014 11:56:49
Great show by the boys. Nice to see Arsenal defenders blow their cheeks in relief, having survived our attacks. We have moved up a tier, it is plain to see. This was another match we could have won 5-1. Never mind! The boys were brilliant! In this form top4 is a certainty and the league will not be that far behind.
It is a blessing in disguise, as much as I would've loved to see our boys at Wembley, the league is much more important for us, at this point of time.
BR is doing a great job and the team look MEAN!
We have moved up a tier, I no longer fear any team and that is down to the everyone at the club. You made me proud yesterday, boys. Thank you.

YNWA

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I agree. We were awso me and we dominated them to the point of them pooping in their pants each time we penetrated their box with slick passing and movement. If we beat the Swans on sun and Everton tie or lose to chelsea, they might be semi-eliminated from top 4 contention. In fact, if we win, whatever result in the everton-chelsea game will benefit us regardless.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 11:45:07
Why do I get a bad feeling that Webb will be in charge when we play the Manca at Old trafford?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Don`t be surprised if it happens because I wouldn`t be.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 11:32:44
Sturridge was poor yesterday and he knew it. When all the players had left the pitch he walked over to us all and gave his shirt to a fan. He looked proper gutted. Great reaction by him. Great player, just a bad day at the office. We all have them

Believable0 Unbelievable0

You my son, need to take your head out of your ass! Liverpool were great yesterday and will finish way above your so called (on loan) team, Lol!
Must be getting to you that you come on our site and talk out of your ass.
Enjoy boy, it's going to get a lot worse for you team of loanees!
ENJOYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I think you might have replied to the wrong post mate.}

Sturridge poor?

I know he missed a few but I thought he was the best player on the pitch yesterday, along with Suarez and Sterling.

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree. He sat on the pitch an looked dejected and sad. As a striker who missed those chances and lost, you always have this feeling that its your fault your team lost even though nobody`s blame you for it. As a former striker, I went thru that a few times and u can`t wait for the next game to make amends. He has our support and I`m sure BR will massage his bruised confidence and get him going again. We were class at the emirates.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sturridge didn't have his best game but it shows the type of lad he is becoming. last year or two he would have walked off and thought ah well with his its all about me attitude. Yesterday at the end it shows to me he cares more now about the team and club, also shows what he expects from himself. Glad we have him. Things are looking positive for us for the future let's just get that final push now for the CL place.

Agree0 Disagree0

You could tell he was gutted at the end if the game when he was head between knees sat on the pitch. He played well but too flashy with his 2nd and 3rd effort and it didn't come off for him. If it goes in like it did v Villa then its amazing but he should have hit the 3rd attempt instead of trying to round the keeper, who also had a great game for Arsenal and read him well in fairness.

He will make up for it against the Swans all being well! Not that he needs to, he has been immense this season!

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 11:32:43
So that's another season without silverware for you then. Not even the triple salko with tucked pike fooled Howard Webb either towards the end of the game. Haha. And by the way has your manager been moonlighting on Coronation Street? Only that there are numerous mentions of Fat Brenda in the Cab Office.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

U stick to watching Corrie, We'll have something better to watch midweek in the evenings next season

Agree0 Disagree0

Archetypal EFC supporter. So engrossed with LFC that the only satisfaction in their day is when something completely unrelated to their OWN team happens.

Sad, pathetic and amusing in equal measures. Congrats for making your meagre fan base look even more stupid.

JFT 96

JP

Agree0 Disagree0

Haha great reply UnicornRiver

Agree0 Disagree0

Titles not over yet until the fat Brenda sings

Agree0 Disagree0

A bluenose poking fun at our trophy cabinet, am I missing something here?

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 12:35:40
you have to laugh at an everton fan scoffing us about going another season without silverware (1995): ), i'm sure arsenal have enough in them to hit them for at least 3-0, so where left with the battle for top 4 finish I know whos position I would rather be in hope you get europa though thursday sunday going to need plenty of loan signings for that.

Agree0 Disagree0

Don't mention about silverware Davey
Last time you won it, we were busy doing our job with Windows 95
By the way, just want to say hi to everton's amazing player: Kevin Miralles.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hey Blue nose, I`d be more afraid of what could happen to your village team by sun because if we beat the swans and you lose or tie to chelsea, u could be b/w 10 or 11 points behind us for top 4 in which case, you would be looking at a mountain to climb and even your game in hand might not be worth that much after that. So you can have your fa cup q-final while we cruise into top 4 or maybe even better. Perrenial losers!

Agree0 Disagree0

Hey bluenose, "another season without silverware" wow how funny is that, embarrassing!

Agree0 Disagree0

Daveyboy, you're just right awful at banter mate.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 11:25:36
the dust as settled now, it was a pen no doubt, but if webb would of had a perfect game he would off send gerard off.so what would you rathr have.a replay and gerard misses games

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I have said all day Arsenal have the squad to cope with more games than us. Their team yesterday was a suposed to be a second string but the only weak link on paper was Sanogo and he played well.

I think we would miss Gerrard in the next few league games if he was sent off so really Webb has done us a favour.

I would rather go out than have a replay but we had enough chances to win the game outright yesterday, even without the penalty.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 11:11:06
Eds fellow reds, 12 games left for us this season
Team talk from BR should be . That he want at least 27 points
From these remaining games .

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Nah, want 36 at least really.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 10:57:31
@JimmyHustle. Thanks for offering help with the Cardiff game tickets.
Have provided email i'd to Ed02 :) (how kind of you 2 guys).
Please let me know if tickets can be available

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Hey mate - I am still waiting for confirmation. As you can imagine (or maybe can't), a lot of lads in Cardiff are Liverpool supporters so the tickets are wanted badly.

I will do all I can to get them for you though, and will give you a definite answer as soon as I can. I will certainly aim for the end of this week (can't remember your travelling days)

Cheers

Agree0 Disagree0

Hi Jimmy:) Cheers . Thanks again amte.
its 15 - 29th March, I have weekend of Cardiff vs LFC to enjoy
22nd March .

And sure even in Cardiff LFC will be madly supported
even Down in India its a massivly supported club

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 10:33:28
Has anyone been keeping up with how Illori is doing he looked amazing in his last game.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_H8drZCnNNY

Believable0 Unbelievable0

He appears to have very good long passing abilities for a young CB. Encouraging and hope he does well on loan.

Agree0 Disagree0

Remind anyone of a young agger? good on the ball, tall but not the strongest. Good thing is he has time on his side and apparently has pace to burn

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 10:20:02
BANTER PLEASE/

Good performance, bad result. I know Sturridge must be gutted as he knows he should have buried a couple and on another day the timing of Fabianski's save with his foot would have been too slow to stop suarez's shot. An YES we should have had a second penalty . BUT we should just take it as a blessing in disguise. I would have loved for Liverpool to WIN the FA Cup but if we were not going to would prefer to get knocked out now rather than play 3 more games(if there aren't any replays) and lose in the final.
We have 12 games to go, not extra games or potential replays. Its all set up and we need to try to win every game.
YNWA

Believable0 Unbelievable0

17 Feb 2014 10:01:01
Awful decision on the penalty - surely now it is time for technology to come in as I am sure HW would have given it with the benefit of a replay.

In fairness he got that badly wrong but he was absolutely spot on with his handling of Sterling. Another ref would have sent him off and a lengthy ban would have followed.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

You can't keep stopping the came for replays because players are unhappy. The game needs to flow and it can only do that if decisions are made instantly.

Agree0 Disagree0

You could watch a replay and make a decision based on it in roughly the same time it takes the players to shut up after a bad decision.

Agree0 Disagree0

Every decision is both good and bad because every decision is favourable to one side and unfavourable to the other. All you will do is encourage players to continually challenge the referee on the off chance the replay will overturn it.

Agree0 Disagree0

I totally agree you can't keep stopping but what if it was like cricket but only get one descion to go for it

Agree0 Disagree0

Touching the ref is NOT a sending off offence. It`s a caution hence, sterling could`ve gotten a yellow at worst. Webb didn`t book SG just as he didn`t book podolski for his rash challenge on flanno. Those are open to ref interpretation. But the pen WAS a pen and should`ve given it. And nobody should give me the excuse of he already gave one because there`s no rule regarding a quota of penalties that should be given to a team during a game.

Agree0 Disagree0

Easy red Lenin just give each team a maximum of 1 appeal each match.

Agree0 Disagree0

Redohio, have to say if I had been Webb my personal reaction to Sterling would have been far more severe than Webb's talking to and he probably would have been on his way down the tunnel. You never, ever touch the referee like that and I hope young Raheem apologized for his actions.

Agree0 Disagree0

IMOHO, using camera technology for the likes of goal line scrambles etc make sense to do this, but on decisions which are based on opinion then surely these decisions have to be left down to the referee, only matter of fact, black or white decisions can surely be challenged with any real lasting effect?

Agree0 Disagree0

Rugby is done in seconds it should be brought in its 2014 6 years old can use iphones but replays are to hard to do in football

Agree0 Disagree0

Kirkbyjohn - as it is the ref has to call it one way or the other in a split second. With technology they have the opportunity to look at it again to get more information to make their opinion. They would be more likely to get it right. This works well in other sports where the referee asks for the replay.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 09:15:29
I know people will be gutted about yesterdays result and going out the cup but you have to take stock and really think about it.
We still played well and should earnt a replay, something I would have hated, and Sturridge had an off day. We can continue our league form unfaltered by what happened in the cup, and Arsenal simply have more fixtures.
I understand that its the FA Cup and its meant to be this massively prestigious event worldwide, but that isn't really reflected in the prize for winning it.
Even if you go all the way and win it the monetary prize is not even a weeks wages for a top prem club and it gets you long thursday night trips to deepest darkest Russia, Ukraine, Turkey before a league game at the weekend. Does the above not mean it is simply the same as the League Cup? You get the same prize essentially, and if your a top 6 prem club, pushing for top 4, then the league is more important.
Just compare the two, finish 5/6th with the FA Cup, yes you have silverware but you now have to shop at the second tier of talent, play ridiculous away legs and in terms of monegary prizes you can't even pay your staff.
Now, finish 3rd/4th, no silverware but your now in the most prestigious club competition in the world with a minimum £30m tv deal and are now able to attract the best players in the world with extra money to buy and pay them.
Unfortunately the FA Cup is billed as prestigious but in reality is just as Mickey Mouse as the League Cup.
I personally believe that winning the FA Cup should give the winner a place in the 3rd Qualifying round of the Champions League, instead of fourth.
The reason we have seen smaller teams win the FA Cup in recent years is down to the fact that by the time the 4th/5th round comes round the big teams are vying for other things. Some are hopeful of the Champions League. Some the Premiership, others top four. The only time this differs is when there's a big team clash such as City/Chelsea or Arsenal/Liverpool, and even then City and Arsenal both played weakened sides ahead of Champions League fixtures.

In summary, the FA Cup is not what it is billed to be, it is simply another distraction from bigger and better competitions, and winning it only promises the chore of long distance travel for next to no monetary reward the following season, which is how a businessman would view it, and unfortunately football clubs are businesses as well as a passion for millions, and until the reward for winning the trophy is as good as finishing in the Champions League places we will not be blessed with big teams offering it the respect we all think it deserves.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I think some of your post makes some decent point, but could you imagine wigan in the champions league over chelsea or arsenal?

Agree0 Disagree0

I totally disagree with you. The FA cup is the 2nd biggest prize in our domestic game after a top 4 finish. Why not finish top 4 and win cup, then you don't play in Europa cup . Also think the likes of Suarez and Coutinio would love the atmosphere of a Wembley final

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 10:27:15
The difference is that the big teams would put in better teams and performances in the FA Cup and a Wigan winning would be more unlikely, but the Cup would become the event it is billed as.
And if a team like Wigan or whoever did win it, they would still have to overcome the qualifying round, which these days include much bigger teams. If they genuinely got through into the group stage then they wouod have won the cup and qualified by rights and thoroughly deserved their place, and in your example Arsenal would have not finished in the top 3 or won the cup and therefore would not have any right to the Champions League.
The only way 4th place would be hsed as Champs League spot would be if one of top 3 teams won the FA Cup.
I think it would work much better.

Agree0 Disagree0

What team did City put in that final? The champions league is meant to be about the best teams facing off against 1 another. Wigan certainly wouldn't be that. They've proved they have neither the depth or ability to compete at that level. They are barely staying alive in the championship, having played in this years europa league.

It would be embarrassing. This weekend fixtures pitted the top 4 against each other.so 1/2 the strong competion is out before the quarter finals

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 12:29:48
JW, if the FA Cup was the second biggest prize, as it is supposed to be, then the reward for winning it would be as such. Unfortunately the prize is around 30 times less than getting into the Champions League.
So it is the second biggest trophy but in terms of biggest prizes you have to say that 1st 2nd 3rd and 4th in the league are worth more, and even winning the Championship play off final is worth more than the FA Cup!
Finishing in top 4 and winning the Cup is obviously preferable to finishing top 4 without the cup. Think about the possibility of replays and double legged semi finals, extra injuries. Just look at the weakened line ups from Arsenal and City, then tell me they see the FA Cup as the 2nd biggest prize in our domestic season!
I get the clamour for silverware from fans, I am a fan but also a realist, top 4 is worth more financially and gives the club a better foundation to improve and move forward than the FA Cup does, in its current form.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 13:29:53
Im not saying my idea of Champions League for winning the FA Cup is the best idea, was just an idea.
But I think all must agree that winning the FA Cup should be worth more somehow to make it the prestigious event it is supposed to be.
The FA Cup is historic and a tradition but has failed to move with the times, and has failed to adapt since the introduction and then development of the european leagues.
Perhaps the answer is that the Europa League needs to be worth more hence increasing the value of winning the FA Cup, but still, you get Europa League from winning the inferior League Cup.

Agree0 Disagree0

It could simply be worth more in terms of cash value for winning. Right now I think it's what, a little less than 2M or so for winning? Or enough to pay our wage bill for all of a week or so? Try to somehow get it to be worth 10M-ish and I think you'd see an improvement in the competition.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 09:03:44
I always get a bad feeling when Webb is chosen for our matches. I'm not necessarily saying that he is always biased against us (even though it certainly feels that way), but he always makes game changing mistakes, every bloody time I see him ref. Granted, Suarez tends to wave his arms about like he has fallen down a hole and nobody can see him, but it really doesn't alter what happened 10 feet infront of him. He is worse than a bad ref. how he can called an 'elite ref' is a complete bloomin' mystery to me. All I can say is I hope that his next mistake goes in our favour, but I would be surprised if it does. And there will be a fair few more mistakes, I'm sure.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

17 Feb 2014 08:53:11
In the end the facts are - Arsenal made 7 changes to their side for yesterday's game which is understandable in view of a very important CL game this week.

BR made 3 wholly unnecessary changes, which I really didn't understand - why change a winning team, particularly when this was our only real chance of silverware this season

They had 2 shots on goal and scored twice. We just cannot defend anymore.

Please don't get too carried away by the performance - they got a 2 goal lead and then sat back to defend, conceding all the possession to us.

We were in effect playing their 2nd string.

Very, very disappointed that once again, we have failed.

KBL

Believable0 Unbelievable0

BR made three changes which were:

Goalkeeper to give Jones a game.

Agger for Toure, who has been poor in recent weeks so I don't blame him and Agger is the vice captain.

Allen for Henderson, who has a wrist injury and has played every league game this season so deserved a rest.

Arsenal have such a big squad that they can afford to make so many changes and still have a strong team. It was by no means a second string.
The only surprise was Sanogo who actually gave our CB's a hard time.

Any other day we would have been 2-0 up in the first 10 mins and had a second penalty.

Agree0 Disagree0

Fair points Jay.

I just worry that we have not been able to open up a points cushion on Spurs - or Everton really. So it will be touch and go for 4th, so the FA Cup was an opportunity for a trophy at least.

KBL

Agree0 Disagree0

KBL we have an 8 point gap over Everton. That's not too bad and a three point gap over spurs and just four off top.

Agree0 Disagree0

And a good that might as well be an extra point.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 08:45:54
Kemlyn red. i'm sorry but you are a disgrace. I agree webb was poor but to blame it on him being an ex-cop is ridiculous. The police officers of merseyside and everywhere else in the country do a fabulous job and should be applauded not ridiculed. U cannot judge the current day police on the few who made so many mistakes in 1989.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

There is a minority of police officers in merseyside who are a disgrace mate.
Absolutely no doubt about that.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 08:14:48
I didn't get to see the game yesterday, but I read the match report and caught a few highlightes. Well done to the lads, BR doesn't take losing too well, I guess he's as passionate as any fan .
Last season at this time and we lost to Arsenal, i'd be furious. But this year I really couldn't have a care in the world, cause I know that the next team we play will get a bashing to remember. Were a work in good progress, keep it up lads.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

17 Feb 2014 08:05:37
Hi eds
Was just wondering do we have a dedicated coach in charge of defending at the club like arsenal do with bold? Really think with a few changes to defence we could have saved a great deal more points and goals this season as out attack and general play is sensational and other than a slight upgrade on full backs especially on the left I don't think the personnel is the problem with the defence except for the slight positional issues of skrtel at times
Cheers

Believable0 Unbelievable0

They have Bould who was a beast in his day and they are still awful. We carved them open at will over the two games which proves my point. Defending is an attitude, a culture and a mindset that needs to be instilled in the team thru its players and coaches and tactics IMO.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 02:14:52
For me, Suarez is wasted out wide. He needs to play more central with Sturridge and Sterling at either side.

Red Rum

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Sturridge would be wasted wide more than Suarez is.

Agree0 Disagree0

Yeah Strurridge had an off day.

BR should have taken off him in second half and put Suarez in the middle and played Mosses out wide.

Sometimes BR need to make these adjustments Suarez this goalless streak is not good.

Agree0 Disagree0

I think it is to control the midfield and still be attacking minded, but I agree Suarez is less influential out wide.

Against Swansea, hopefully, we go back to a 4-4-2/.

Agree0 Disagree0

I believe we missed Henderson and the way he covers the wide area when Suarez drifts infield. His energy levels allow him to cover that half of the pitch.

I thought Allen played well yesterday however he seemed to play the role different to Hendo.
He was getting into advanced positions but very centrally. This was keeping Suarez outwide and with only Flanagan overlapping there wasn't much of a threat down that side.

Having said that Suarez still nearly scored three which just shows how high his standards are.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Feb 2014 02:11:53
A little bit disappointed with the result but overall not too bad feeling due to the way we play our football and the fact that it's not a league match
Really hope we can win the FA cup again to be honest but league is our priority
I am really impressed with Sterling, he performs very well in every position
Even when he plays as a right back
Hope he can continue progressing
I also think that Gerrard is getting better and better with his new role
He's not a young powerful player as he used to, but he still got that energy
His sprint to cover Ox on the first half really surprised me
Howard Webb again and again proves that he is a poor referee
I don't think he has special agenda against us, he's just a poor referee
One quick question for the people here, according to your opinion:
Who is the best referee in England right now?

Indonesian Red

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Best referee in England? Well, I think Michael Oliver is better than most, but he is not great either.

Agree0 Disagree0

Webb is useless in that he makes mistakes that affect both teams whereby he`s always trying to make up for a mistake for one team by penalising the other IMO. Mihael Oliver`s a VERY promising ref but my fav`s always been Mike Dean.

Agree0 Disagree0

Love Michael Oliver as well. No ref is going to get 100% of decisions always right as that's just the way it is but I like how Oliver isn't afraid of a bit of banter with the players and generally seems to actually like what he is doing. Probst generally seems to have a good sense of humor about him as well (or at least Bellamy seems to think so).

Agree0 Disagree0

Michael Oliver also looks like Branislav Ivanovic. Lol.

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent