Liverpool Banter Archive August 11 2015

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

11 Aug 2015 23:47:08
{Ed's Note - We have posted a new article entitled, The Van Gaal Philosophy Revealed (No, Really!)

Believable1 Unbelievable1

11 Aug 2015 22:56:45
All this talk about Rodgers messing players about has got me thinking. Steven Gerard, a lad that brought me so much pride and enjoyment as a Liverpool fan over the years. I was at Anfield the night he scored that goal against Olympiacos. Not to mention the countless other joyful moments of sheer brilliance he conjured-up over the years. For me, he should never, ever have been allowed to leave. He should've been groomed for manager. Compared to a Sterling, for example, he is an icon, a giant among men. And this is a fella that has Liverpool football club in his heart. He was with us since he was 8 years old! 8 years old!!!
This question then is to any of you eds. Did Rodgers have a hand in his leaving? I'm not bothered too much about Rodgers and his shortcomings. I've seen worse to be honest. But if he had a hand in my club disrespecting Steven Gerard - our leader, our saviour on so many occasions. Then for me that would be unforgivable. Did Steven Gerard leave because of Brendan Rodgers? Did Rodgers force him out? Or did our captain just fancy a change of scenery at the tail end if his career??? Please tell me it was the latter .

Believable4 Unbelievable4

{Ed002's Note - Gerrard has said that the decision to leave was made when he was dropped against Real MAdrid.}

12 Aug 2015 01:18:06
I love Stevie and I don't begrudge him his time in LA. He has earned it. He had an awful season last year and maybe his time had come. Enjoy the sunshine fella you will always be a legend.

Agree6 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 02:09:02
As much as I disagree with rodgers decision, the whole 11 was basically dropped. Good job they all didn't decide to leave

Agree2 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 10:07:02
Bad decision to drop him but didn't Rodgers say he dropped a lot of them because they weren't putting effort in, like in the Newcastle game before it? Also our first 11 didn't exactly play well against Madrid in the first leg, so I don't completely disagree with what Rodgers did on that occasion.

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 10:36:46
how may seasons did Stevie give good dervice to Liverpool they could have afforded him 1 bad one he is only human even though as fans we see him as so much more. I would have like to se him end up like Ryan Giggs did at man u where he finished his career at Liverpool and then went straight into management.Remember what he did in Istanbul.There were other clubs with world class players and everyone rated our players and mediocre but at the time Milan were very strong and not the manager but the captain rallied the troops to victory so i think him having great leadership skills wold be great if he was to be come Liverpool manager as Liverpool is always in his heart and blood just as mine even though i live in SA

Agree2 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 14:00:25
Great point, Zaak

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 22:41:37
My two cents worth regarding Lucas.

As it stands Lucas should be the first name on the team sheet. He's the only midfielder that naturally comes deep for the ball and brings other midfielders into play. He's also the only defensive midfielder at the club. In an ideal world you'd have a top class holding midfielder, someone like Kovacic or Illarramendi in the starting XI and have Lucas on the bench for when we need to see out a game or tighten up defensively. Maybe give him the nod when we go into a game that will require a lot of defending.

He's not someone that should be sold at this moment in time. Hendo and Milner can not play a full season as holding midfielders. Both are naturally attacking players and need someone behind them to allow them freedom to get forward. Neither is defensively good enough to protect the back 4.

Red Rum

Believable8 Unbelievable8

12 Aug 2015 00:19:31
Illara is not better than Lucas because he was bought to take Alonso's job at RM and for two years, couldn't get a game and still couldn't when he left so no thanks. As for Kovacic, I would have liked him here if Milner was not here. Lucas has shown his quality and BR did not sell him in Jan because he needed him. Now. He's back to trashing him because he thinks he does not need him anymore. BR has learnt nothing and the fact that Lucas or Can did not start at DM vs Stoke and we did sod all until Can came on, proves that.

Agree4 Disagree1

12 Aug 2015 06:10:10
Redohio

Illara is a good player mate and technically sound. There was a reason he was bought to replace Alonso and it's his quality.
There are no of reasons a player doesn't get enough games at a club. Lucas for instance, it need not be quality.
Ever Benega or Medal would be realistic depending up on the price. Kovacic would be the best.

Agree0 Disagree5

11 Aug 2015 22:09:54
"Give me Lucas Leiva and 10 pieces of sticks, and I will win you the UCL" ~ Me
If we are actually looking to sell a player of Lucas' character and attitude, it is such a shame, especially after convincing him to stay in January. Lucas is a model professional, a player we have massively underappreciated and underrated and would have been one of the best holding midfielders if not for injury. I can only wish him all the best as I think he is fed up with such treatment now.
Eventually though, it may give the likes of Rossiter and Chirivella a much needed chance in the first team so could be a plus.

Believable15 Unbelievable2

11 Aug 2015 22:33:48
assuming we don't purchase a slightly more experienced player ahead of them, as that seems to be the trend.

Agree5 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 22:46:10
I think 70% of liverpool fans don't agree with BR wanting to sell Lucas and I'm one of them, but even so if he won't play him then Lucas has to go really. As for possible replacements I can't see us going for a big price tag player, rather someone who will have a squad role because it would holt Emre Can's momentum in the team. Thiago Motta would be my choice, we wouldn't lose top level experience that way as well. illarramendi would be too much like a Allen/Borini/Lallana signing why buy a player you don't need at a price we don't need to spend to fill that role.

Agree2 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 06:11:54
Haych

I disagree mate. It's the position we should have made the best signing IMO. Such a crucial position in Football. A CDM / DLP is the spine of your team.

Agree2 Disagree6

12 Aug 2015 07:18:56
I can't see us replacing him at all. Brenda is so determined to have creative players all over the pith and does not believe we need a dm. Why on earth would he buy another. If he was going to play with an actual dm in the starting 11 then lucas would not be getting sold, he would be happy as he would be playing more regularly. He should be the first name on the team sheet but unfortunately for lfc any type of dm is going to just rot either on the bench or in the reserves until we replace rodgers.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 07:39:43
Johnlfc

He wants a playmaker in that position someone who could defend also. There are very few in europe and that makes not looking at Morgan a bigger joke. If you could convince Frimino, You could have easily convinced Morgan.

Alonso would have been a very good signing.

Agree0 Disagree5

11 Aug 2015 22:09:43
First of all: Eds, thank you for this site and all your insight. I have followed this page for years and have never needed any other outlet for LFC-related information regarding player transfers and the complicated system around them. I have learned heaps, even about that of which we do not speak; finances.

Over these years there has always been your fair share of plastic fans who slaughter players before they've kicked a ball for us, and jumps on the backs of others who have served us greatly and maybe went into decline. That is to be expected, as that's how things are in society in general. However, there always used to be a certain positive shine to things and a sort of togetherness. This off season though, I personally feel that the negativity is overshadowing that.

Now, I don't mean those who are voicing their concerns about transfers and treatment of certain players, or even the manager - but this doom and gloom about everything LFC.

Surely my little rant won't make a difference, but I just needed to get i off my chest as I really appreciate this site and don't like what is becoming the norm seemingly. You have my full support and I guess I just feel like saying the site deserves a lot better, as does our club.

Support!

YNWA, thank you - pronin

Believable10 Unbelievable1

12 Aug 2015 10:43:52
I totally agree that we are Liverpool I remember some saying that a club is nothing without its supporters so let try to comment on the positives let just try

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 20:51:59
Question for ed001 we moved suso on who brendan spoke highly of at times and we delayed his career do you think the same will happen to texiera? Do you think we will keep him another year when ultimately he will be moved on
Ed002 can answer also as she never sugar coats the truth wich i think is the best policy

Believable1 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - It is hard to see how he will get a chance this season with so many similar players at the club - perhaps a run out in the League Cup. Moving forward a decision will need to be made.}

11 Aug 2015 20:51:25
Ron keague:
''I feel sorry for you all, you are going to have to do some serious back pedalling if we win the league. Perhaps you'd rather we didn't?''

care to turn that into a bet,me and EMS did one last year. This would be easy money,lets make it for charity big boy,come on put your money where your faith is!

Believable5 Unbelievable7

11 Aug 2015 23:20:09
To make it more fair you should make it top 4 for a fighting chance.

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 00:23:44
If we don't win the PL, Ron will have an excuse and who he's going to blame on deck and ready to go, just like his BFF

Agree2 Disagree1

12 Aug 2015 08:02:13
Sorry Irish but if he's going to make big claims like that he needs to back them up

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 10:45:50
So bobatron, we are only one game in and you are that confident the club won't win the league you are making a bet?

Agree0 Disagree1

12 Aug 2015 11:58:41
Yes Jay,it wasn't that difficult to understand was it?

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 20:35:33
Love your site Eds. great work

I just want to say that there appears to be people on here who will be disappointed if we do well this season because it will mean Rodgers survives! Surely our club challenging and winning is the most important thing. I appreciate that some of you have no confidence in Rodgers to achieve that but while he is the boss we should support and back him. If he fails then the owners will act.

Treating players badly? Where's the evidence for that? Players who left? Really would you trust the word of people who are trying to justify why they left or can't face the fact that they were not good enough.

We got a great result at Stoke now let's make sure we continue to support our team and let whatever happens happen

Believable3 Unbelievable6

11 Aug 2015 23:01:51
I would trust the word of Daniel Agger over BR any day of the week, yeah.

Agree6 Disagree1

12 Aug 2015 00:27:21
Cook ester, your attempt to absorb BR of blame on this issue has failed, miserably. We have the Eds to rely on for info on this issue and all you did in your post was make suppositions which have no basis in fact or reality. If you have better info, prove the Eds wrong on this issue or Combe back when you have true facts to debunk their information.

Agree3 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 07:24:35
What do you mean "if he fails the owners will act" he failed miserably last season and all the owners done was change his backroom staff. He has since continued to throw money around without reducing the size of the squad or the wage bill, continued upsetting players and going back on promises made. How many more times does he need to fail lfc before the owners act?

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 20:28:59
To the people slating Rodgers for the poor treatment of Lucas i agree every manager must be true to the players but let's all consider what the manager wants in a dm and what lucas does. I think Rodgers wants a ball playing Dm in which the ball playing quality of the DM is more valued than his ability to tackle. So does lucas fits the bill I think no. Yes he is the best midfielder in our team in certain departments which are tackling, interception and defensive positioning but he is nowhere good enough as a ballplaying midfielder. Can on the other hand while playing Cb has shown us he is a good ballplaying footballer who is also mobile and a good tackler so I think Can is a better option in DM than Lucas. But again Lucas's commitment to the club deserved better treatment from Rodgers but rather than questioning his motive in making Lucas the 4th or 5th choice mid I would question the way he has communicated it to Lucas

Believable7 Unbelievable7

11 Aug 2015 22:34:52
well if that's what you think let's see if Can gets a game ahead of Milner or Hendo? come to think of it I would be surprised if Teachers pet Allen is not ahead of him when fit?
I'm slating Rodgers the mans got us going dizzy

Agree0 Disagree2

11 Aug 2015 23:46:06
Cruelharsh - Lucas is our best ball playing defensive midfielder we have because he's the only senior defensive midfielder at the club. If Rodgers wants a DM who's better on the ball than Lucas, then he needs to buy one. Can's a fine player, but he has no positional discipline at the moment and regardless of how fit, strong and good at tackling he is, that's a huge problem for a defensive midfielder, it will cost us and could potentially upset Can's development as a player. It should as plain as day looking at him play that he's not suited to the position (which would be a waste of his attacking potential anyway). Neither is Allen.

I'll put it to you this way: Rodgers dropped Lucas at the start of last season, but had to recall him because we were leaking goals like mad and had no semblance of cohesion bringing the ball out from the back. And the only change to his central midfield options this season is that he has Milner instead of Gerrard. This time he won't have Lucas to recall. Hopefully there'll be a silver lining and he'll call up Rossiter who'll step up to the plate, but personally I expect to him shoe horn Can, Allen and Hendo in there one after another and sit there scratching his head wondering why it doesn't work.

Agree4 Disagree1

12 Aug 2015 00:32:09
Spot on, Something! Cruel, you are missing the point. If
Lucas is not good enuff, then let that be a football issue that can be debated. Treating players disgracefully and going back on your word at every turn is the issue here which many are not happy about. Lucas was gone in Jan but BR begged him to stay because we were aweful and couldn't keep a clean sheet and Lucas and Sahko, another one of his punching bags, delivered. Now, he's back to trashing them. Try to seperate the two in order to see the bigger picture.

Agree3 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 07:14:38
Agree Something Red
Even though Lucas was converting from an attacking midfielder to a defensive midfielder (explains why he still gets caught out of position) he is the best we have

Trying to get Milner/Henderson/Allen/Can to play this specialist role is asking for trouble

The only way to avoid needing this role is to change tactics to a 4-4-2 , get the midfield 4 to sit closer to the back 4 (high or deeper) squeezing out any space between the two banks of 4
Drop the pressing game for the midfield as this creates gaps for the opposition to play and leave the pressing to the front 2
This is deemed as archaic and negative counter attack style of football but it still works for certain teams

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 10:57:03
I couldn't agree more, Something Red. If Lucas isn't he's type of DM, then he should have bought someone else, who plays the role the way he wants. These makes Milners signing all the more confusing.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 19:31:42
Cont from previous post going back to Lucas the guy seriously deserves to be treated better if everything we read is to be believed.I still remember the Lucas that first came to the club with the long hair and the headband that couldn't pass the ball 5 yards who got dogs abuse at Anfield ( from myself included I have to say) but respect to the guy he got his head down and for a couple of seasons before the injuries started he was the best player of his type around.

Good luck lad if you do end up moving on.

Believable19 Unbelievable1

11 Aug 2015 18:50:35
If the rumours about Lucas leaving are true than I for one will be deliriously happy. The guy is the epitome of class and deserves to be treated with dignity and be one of the first names on the team sheet. We can't offer him any of the above although we reneged on promises made to him of this very nature. I know some of you think Can is the second coming (myself included) but one swallow doesn't make a summer. The kid is going to be special but I still feel he is too inconsistent and raw to be a regular. That's why we need lucas the destroyer, Mr consistency to do the unsung hero job that Milner and Henderson can't do and that Can hasn't got the discipline for yet. Just shows again what a disingenuous charlatan Brendan Rogers is who has a distinct lack of class to go with his supersize ego. Good luck in pastures new Mr Lucas Leiva and thank-you for your unflinching service to Liverpool FC.

Believable25 Unbelievable5

11 Aug 2015 19:22:17
I also want him to leave.

Agree3 Disagree9

11 Aug 2015 21:55:15
I actually don't think Lucas' ability and talent is either here nor there in this argument. Personally, I think to treat a player of ours who has given so many years of good service in such a deplorable way is the issue. If BR doesn't rate him, fine. If he doesn't want him, fine. But there is a way to go about this especially with a model professional like Lucas. We currently seem INCAPABLE of moving players on without some sort of row/falling out/scandal.

Agree5 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 22:37:44
indian red you haven't a clue

Agree2 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 00:33:44
My sentiments exactly, Puzzled.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 18:14:26
Well done harry for your ITK statement yesterday, you were actually right about this one.

Anybody sugar coating this and saying we're all using this as an excuse to have a go at rodgers, wow the hypocricy is maddening. You ask us to stand by the manager and accuse us of being disloyal, yet you seemingly don't care about the management and treatment of players.

Let me remind you the list of players (excluding the youngsters who we assume he screwed over) who have claimed to be mismanaged, mistreated and screwed over by rodgers are:

Sahin
Carra
Downing
Agger
Sterling
Lucas
Sakho

and even sinclair, a young player, has recently made such calims.

I think the evidence is there what the main cause of problems is at liverpool, but i guess some fans know better than the people who actually have to play under him.

Believable13 Unbelievable10

11 Aug 2015 18:38:06
For the most part I agree but I feel Rodgers gave downing ample chances to prove himself.
Agger couldn't stay fit and even minor injuries kept him out for months.
I seem to recall Sahin refusing to play a number ten role for us.
Although sterling was mismanaged by Rodgers it would be unfair of us to lay all of that blame on him.
There are individual circumstances to each case. I don't disagree with most examples but I do think the total generalisation is a touch unfair.

Agree8 Disagree5

11 Aug 2015 18:48:05
There are 2 sides to every story, just taking the players version at face value is naïve.
Movement is normal in football. Sometimes the clubs want the move, sometimes the players want the move. It should be done with dignity and discretion.
Sakho disrespected the fans and the club last season because he wasn't picked. He was totally unprofessional and is in no position to hand out opinions on people's actions.
Sterling is worse than Sakho, no respect for the club or the fans, just a selfish unprofessional kid.
Sahin was rubbish, not many will argue with that.
Downing also worse than Sahin. Where are they now?
Never heard Carra say Rodgers mistreated him or screwed him over, maybe you could give quotes and context?
Agger was moved on, it happens get over it.
Movement is normal. Paisley moved players on when he found better ones, it's no big deal. Sadly these social media times have turned it all into a children's playground with people playing the blame game.

Agree7 Disagree8

{Ed001's Note - Paisley told players honestly when he was moving them on, not begged them to stay in January promising them all sorts, then dump them again in the summer. This is not normal, this is mismanagement.}

11 Aug 2015 18:52:49
Good post. People will turn a blind eye but there are far underlying problems at the club with the manager being the foremost
#negativeandpessimistic

Agree8 Disagree1

11 Aug 2015 19:01:56
I am pretty sure you could add a couple more names by next summer. Markovic, Ilori.
Don't ask me what's their crime.

Agree7 Disagree5

11 Aug 2015 19:19:22
I don't see why there's a problem, people seem to be desperately looking for problems.
As Ed002 would say managers (and players) are transient employees of the club. Some will feel aggrieved when they leave, so what? They're multimillionaires, I'm sure they'll get over it.

Agree9 Disagree5

{Ed001's Note - it doesn't mean you should treat them like pricks. Give it a rest Ron, on this point only a fool can think it is a good thing to treat players like utter scum when we are already struggling to attract the ones we want. We need every selling point we can get, instead of more reasons for them to look elsewhere.}

11 Aug 2015 19:19:55
Entirely agreed with Ed001 on this. It's not just poor management in a footballing sense, it's poor management of people in general who are working for you. Players, like all employees, simply want to be told where they stand and BR is seemingly very, very bad at doing this part of the job. I don't particularly have a problem with BR thinking player X, Y, or Z needs to move on as fair enough, it's how he handles it (or doesn't) that massively needs to improve. I imagine he expects honesty and open communication from the board, perhaps he could give his players the same courtesy.

Agree3 Disagree5

11 Aug 2015 19:35:31
Ron
I seriously think you should apply for the post of BR's press secretary.

Agree3 Disagree2

11 Aug 2015 19:46:24
Do you know what the best part about this is?

Within 12 months (possibly after a certain transient employee leaves), we'll spend at least twice what we get for Lucas on another player to exactly the same job, and to do it no better than Lucas does.

Agree10 Disagree3

11 Aug 2015 19:49:20
Ron, your post makes little sense. First you talk about how people need to be dealt with respect and dignity and that the likes of Sakho and Sterling deserves none from LFC, then you talk about Sahin and Downing being crap. So, just because they didn't perform, Rodgers can disrespect them and be unprofessional towards them? Like Lucas?

Agree3 Disagree3

11 Aug 2015 19:50:48
I hope we have a good season but I am expecting Brendan to mess up sometime and then when John Henry pulls the trigger we can hopefully move on .

There are lots of positive aspects to the club with the stadium expansion a stronger squad and some good young prospects at the Academy.

The coaching staff also looks to have improved. All in all there should be a good base for when we get a first class coach/manager.

I just think that Brendan is the one big negative. At least we should not have to put up with his antics after this season.

We need to continue to invest in youth and as the Edda say we need to be so much better in managing their career paths so that they develop in a proper managed way.

How we can let Lucas go is beyond belief.

Rodgers clearly has no idea how to set up a side.

All he needs to do is view this site and follow advice from Ed001 and others and he would not make the stupid mistakes that are going to cost him his job in the end.

So bloody frustrating!

Agree3 Disagree1

11 Aug 2015 20:14:36
Completely agree with Ed001 & RDL, it's clearly a problem that can do nothing but compound the poor reputation the club is rapidly gathering

Agree7 Disagree1

11 Aug 2015 20:17:11
Oh and Woolback, let's not forget that our current captain would've been sold to Fulham for less than £10m had he not dug in and refused the move.

And Skrtel, like him or not, seemed to be days away from being sold after we signed three center backs in one window and made Agger into the vice-captain, but then he had to be pressed into service against Man U due to injuries and all of sudden was first choice again. And Illori, his replacement, never got a look in as a result.

Rodgers' man management is just plain terrible. I don't think it's intentional, or stems from an arrogant belief that he can do whatever with the players and get away with it. But there's an established pattern of not being able to correctly assess what he has and flip flopping over who he wants and when. He may genuinely believed he needed Lucas in January when he persuaded him to stay. But then 6 months later, he's decide he can do without - and without signing a replacement, so it's not a case that he saw Lucas play 2nd half of last season and decided he wasn't good enough.

If he doesn't sort this out, we will never be able to build a side that can consistently finish in the top 4 and challenge for the league.

Agree6 Disagree1

11 Aug 2015 20:33:34
Rodgers is single handedly destroying the club, he's doing the incredible and making Van Gaal look like a good man manager. I hope he's gone sooner rather than later

Agree6 Disagree2

11 Aug 2015 21:24:48
Ed1, genuine question.

Other than not playing these guys in what way has Rodgers treated them badly? In Lucas' case I understand he was promised game time which he got. The situation has now changed and he'll be allowed to leave.

That doesn't sound disrespectful to me. It sounds like giving a player what he wants and doing it twice for good measure.

Could you give me more detail on how Rodgers has treated these guys?

Agree2 Disagree3

{Ed002's Note - It is poor behaviour by the club.}

11 Aug 2015 22:31:29
Ed2,

There must be more to the situation which isn't common knowledge. Everything I've heard about the Lucas situation points to the club respecting his wishes. He wasn't lied to last winter, he wasn't lied to this summer.

I can understand that people are upset that Rodgers doesn't rate their favorite players but that's our problem not his.

Agree0 Disagree1

{Ed002's Note - It is not the done thing to stop a player from leaving with commitments about his future and then screw hime a few months later. The club has handled numerous players badly in recent times - including those on loan. It is unprofessional.}

11 Aug 2015 23:53:16
Think you're missing the point. Rodgers kept Lucas from leaving by promises of game time. I hardly think it was taken by Lucas to mean for the next couple of months only. It's like your employer giving you a raise to keep you from leaving when you have another opportunity then Turing around and sacking you a month later. It's just not right.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 00:11:42
Muscat, Rodgers is racking up an impressive level of player mis-use. Let's just take the really obvious on the surface stuff, that doesn't require any "ITK" knowledge, shall we?

Rodgers arrived and promptly froze out Enrique, Downing and Hendo before having to use all of them as first choice by December because his replacements weren't good enough.

The following summer, we appointed Agger vice captain, signed three other center backs, and Skrtel, who hadn't started the majority of our games for a few months previously, was practically gone. Then he had one good game and became first choice. Illori never got a look in as a result and a year later Agger left under a cloud. And then we bought another center back.

Same transfer window we loaned out Suso with no clear plan for his future development, and then signed Alberto who plays the same position. Alberto barely played and was loaned out himself a season later, but only after we had alienated and sold Suso.

We loaned in Cissokho and Moses, but ended using players we already had at the club (Flanno & Sterling) instead of them. Wouldn't imagine that did either of those players any good or made their parent clubs particularly happy. Not to mention the expense.

We trumped that last summer, by loaning out one right back and loaning in a far worse one. The fact that Wisdom signed a new contract after that is astounding. But I bet whatever promises have been made to get him to sign won't be fufilled if BR is still in charge when Wisdom returns from Norwich. Oh, and we cut short Manquillo's loan after barely using him. Another player and club no doubt ingratiated to Liverpool FC.

We loaned out Ibe, signed another player who plays his position for £20m, and then recalled him 5 months later.

We completely dropped the ball on Sterling and gave his agent a window to force a transfer.

Despite signing four center backs in two years we still managed to have to play a central midfielder and center back for most of the season, because the manager didn't rate all the CBs he'd bought.


Can it be any more obvious that BR can't make up his mind on what to do with the players he has and that has contributed to so many instances of the club mishandling players? There isn't a "situation which isn't common knowledge" on all of them, mate.

Agree3 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 00:18:28
RDL what was Lucas promised? Were you there? Has it been published? Has Lucas or Rodgers made a statement on the matter?

With due respect to the Eds they've given us no detail on any of this other than 'promises were made and have been broken' and I've seen nothing else reported on the matter.

I like to base my opinions on something more than rumor and outrage and given the evidence presented to me I couldn't even say for sure that Lucas was upset let alone was being treated badly.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - I explained it in January.}

12 Aug 2015 00:24:38
Some people seem to think that just because one is paid a lot of money that they have no feelings like every other god damned human being on this planet.

As for brendan and his management of this club. basically its a crying shame that a man of no morals whatsoever is in charge of this great institution and he is destroying the legacy of much better men than himself from within much like a cancer.

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 00:40:43
Those trying to defend BR on this issue are just as disingenuous and morally dishonest as he is, IMO because there is no way any man with any self respect and dignity will endorse this type of treatment UNLESS he too, would have no prob treating someone else the same way. As for Ron, I think he is BR in disguise because he says the most incoherent things and makes the dumbest comments just to defend his BFF.

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 01:41:14
This is nothing that doesn't happen at other top clubs something red. You keep hold of players until their value is at its highest then if they are not in your plans you sell. It probably is treating players badly but in this world of business it's a necessity. Take your example of Wisdom who in my option is a mid table premier league defender. Do we sell him now for £500,000 or do we send him out on loan, see if he is good enough for us and if not then he had premier league experience and we'll probably get 2 million for him. Makes sense to me.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 01:43:49
Regardless of the ability of the players does it not ring huge alarm bells that that many of them (many more i had forgotton about as well) cited the manager as being an imbecile and the sole reason for them leaving!

Players dissapoint like downing did all the time! And yes he did give him a chance, but downing still claimed he was managed poorly! Surely that says a lot!

And Something Red, the sktrel/agger debacle has baned our defence for what will be the third season in a row now. Yippee.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 01:57:36
That's a brilliant, albeit incredibly sad, summary of Rodgers' transfers Something Red. I don't know that I've ever seen a single manager buy or loan in so many players in such a fairly short amount of time. He's got to be near a record by now?

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 17:56:23
Rodgers has successfully built an under 21 team. and yes yes some players are older. but he wants to control everything where no one can think for themsevles. and lucas is the last to go. unfortunately

but don't worry chaps. when liverpool struggle with clear signs that a dm would have been ideal then u all get your wish and i'm sure the next manager would probably identify that position as important.

so just watch this space

Believable10 Unbelievable7

11 Aug 2015 18:16:02
red lobster with more negative, pessimism, I-told-you-so banter. Boring

Agree9 Disagree5

11 Aug 2015 19:18:25
RL , with some teams we play against the formation we play won't need a DM , and i'm sorry to say but Lucas is not that good anymore there are better DM's out there ,

i think we should keep lucas in the squad but for me he should not be the 1st player on the team sheet , his last 2 games he played last season he was terrible , he gave away a goal in each of the last 2 games from his own mistakes with one he got the ball taken off him because he was taking too long to pass the ball ,

lucas is a great person to have around the club i remember watching a show on LFCTV and he was coming back from injury again but he helped the new players that we had signed settle in and he showed them around the club , but has a player he should not be the 1st name on the team sheet , i think Emre Can will become a very good DEF-MID he has all the tools for this , its just down to BR on how he plays him

Agree3 Disagree9

12 Aug 2015 00:46:26
If BR did not need Lucas, why did he beg him to stay and promised him game time in Jan when we were leaking goals for fun? Didn't think about that now, did you? Listen, whether he is good enuff or not is not the issue because that is a football matter. The issue is the way he is being treated and lied to by BR whenever he feels like it and then leak his boots because he's in trouble, is the issue. Try to seperate the two so you can see the big picture. As Ed said, Paisley was honest and told players the truth when it was time to move them on. What stops BR from doing that? I'll tell you. BR is a liar and irresponsible, a man who can't keep his word or man up face to face with another man is a coward and shouldn't be trusted. That's the diff. Got it?

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 17:30:32
Hi eds,
Any chance you can shed any light on why we didn't move for shaquiri? It seems strange that last year and in January we were interested but he was too expensive and now when he's available for 13.5 m we aren't interested
Cheers pud, great site by the way

Believable4 Unbelievable2

{Ed001's Note - because he is trouble and has not played well in years.}

11 Aug 2015 18:41:56
Yeah his club form has been poor but still has been very consistent in the national team

Agree2 Disagree3

11 Aug 2015 20:16:23
Not being funny, but his international form is irrelevant

Agree1 Disagree4

11 Aug 2015 22:40:09
Yet when we didn't sign him you were all slagging BR and the club, Now he is rubbish and trouble.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 22:53:36
I don't think it's irrelevant it shows he can still be a top player playing in a team that he's happy with I think the loan move to inter didn't work and he was always going to struggle to really push into the bayern team . I don't want him at Liverpool but I think if he settles down and is happy he will be a very useful signing for Stoke . Some players just fit with certain clubs sometimes it's down to attitude of the player other times is just about getting the right fit . Switzerland play to his strengths and if Stoke do the same he should start to get back to becoming a quality player again at club level

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 00:48:09
I didn't slag him off. I knew he wasn't good enuff and the fact that he's off to Stoke, proves my point. From Bayern to Stoke, defo a rise in the footballing world. Lol!!!

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 17:19:37
As far as DM's go, Lucas is our best option for that position by a mile. Its just become more difficult for him to get in the team because we now have a lot of competition for Midfield from the likes of Can Henderson milner. All in all I think it a big mistake if we sell him, if anyone was to leave it should be Allen as he is average at best.
I also think Can hasthe potential to be a world class Mid and I hope he gets lots of game time and goals this season

Believable6 Unbelievable0

11 Aug 2015 18:34:21
The competition is not the problem.

Agree2 Disagree1

12 Aug 2015 00:48:42
The two faced manager who can't keep his word, is the prob

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 16:49:07
Ed01, this one to you mate.
You said earlier in the window of bringing a top class CM to play alongside Lucas in the midfield. Who was your pick mate?

Believable3 Unbelievable2

{Ed001's Note - I would have been happy with Kovacic, though my preference was Medel, as he could help with developing players such as Rossiter.}

11 Aug 2015 17:08:18
Given Lucas departs do you think we might add one?

Agree0 Disagree2

{Ed001's Note - no.}

11 Aug 2015 17:13:20
I still hope we will try for Kovacic if we sell lucas ( 😢) but seems highly unlikely atm

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 17:17:08
Brilliant, So more Milner / Henderson / Allen if Can picks up an injury.

Agree3 Disagree2

11 Aug 2015 17:21:57
Ed1 it could lead to Rossitier having a few more opportunities, especially in cup games, is he ready for the step up?

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - he is ready but we have a logjam in front of him, so it will make little difference to him.}

11 Aug 2015 17:41:22
Kovacic would have been a top signing, but Illarramendi would be a good option.

Red Rum

Agree3 Disagree2

11 Aug 2015 18:02:04
Illaramedi is overrated IMO. Kovacic would have been an infinitely better option. I'd rather we give someone like rossiter a chance than go and sign Illara

Agree2 Disagree1

11 Aug 2015 18:06:30
Kovacic would make the team more complete and balanced. No more Countinho dropping deep to pick the ball as Kovacic would do it perfectly in the middle.
A wonderful creative central midfielder.

Agree2 Disagree5

12 Aug 2015 00:28:05
One of the rare occasions i agree with you Harry.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 00:49:19
Would have had him over Milner any day.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 07:54:31
We need a proper defensive midfielder like lars bender.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 16:09:41
There will be games that we play well. There will be games that we play bad. The difference between a top 4 finish and a finish outside the top 4 is whether we win those game we play badly in. Against Stoke was 1 of them.
Many have said there wasn't any creativity and we diidnt play well. But try to remember that against certain sides, everyone will have thos scrappy games. And Stoke is one of those sides.
Flowing, attractive football will be played agianst teams that play a more open game.
Also, remember that we will concede goals! And it will be by fault of a mistake by a defender or a midfielder. That's football! If all 1w of our players always play a perfect game, we would score everytime we have the ball, we would never concede a goal, and win every game.
Sundays game wasn't the best to watch, but I jumped up and screamed when we scored.
I saw some promise in movement from Benteke, I saw glimpses of our midfield looking up to make the cross to Benteke, I saw a 1-2 with Coutinho and Beneteke. I saw Skrlt make a decisive block.
Can was briliant when he came on. So was Firmino.
But best of all, we won an away game. A difficult game.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - I take it you haven't seen Stoke since Pulis left? They play an open game under Hughes. I expect even more open this season without N'Zonzi.}

11 Aug 2015 16:45:33
It's not the opposition who decides what you play, it's yourself.

Agree0 Disagree5

11 Aug 2015 17:13:20
EG it is the opposition you play that dictates your play and player selection. It happen every week in all leagues across the world.

Agree1 Disagree2

11 Aug 2015 17:43:39
Stoke have a very good squad. A stronger "team" that Spurs, Everton and West Ham if you ask me.

Agree1 Disagree2

11 Aug 2015 20:27:51
Forza I didn't say they have a weak side.I actually think their squad is very good. And Ed, they have changed their game a lot since Pulis, but they do play a more physical game. Its a very different game as to playing Swansea for example. Stoke close down players and break up play very well. Its a good way to play. But it also doesn't allow teams like Liverpool to walk the ball into the box. So a lot of fans won't see the "exciting" game they expect. Liverpool always look a "stronger" side when they play an attacking team. And I'm not saying Stoke isn't moving towards an attacking way of playing. But they still have the physical break down of play. The slower flow of play

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 16:08:31
Well I would have preferred it if we had lost at weekend then I could understand all the whinging.

Really looking forward to Monday night and a Bournemouth win.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

11 Aug 2015 16:14:00
Arsenal game would be the real eye opener, unless you put Bournemouth in the top 10 clubs ( no disrespect )
Real character would be judged against Arsenal😎😎😎

Agree3 Disagree2

11 Aug 2015 17:09:39
Think lavers is having a bit of banter there .
Jamesee

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 17:13:56
You do realize that LAVERS was being sarcastic, Harry?

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 17:44:37
Bournemouth will be a very tough team for a lot of clubs this season. Howe is a good manager, better than rodgers at that stage and talks a lot less.

Agree2 Disagree1

12 Aug 2015 01:06:44
Prolly renegs on promises less than BR does, too

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 14:29:32
It's a banter page but also a base to explore opinion. I don't care if it was the first or last game against stoke. It was a good result but awful performance. And yes the pressure is on Rodgers because he has failed us for three seasons so no I don't see why fans who are aware of this will ignore how we perform. After all if we were to lose the next three games it would come as a surprise to those whose heads are up there backsides.
Rodgers said the performance was very good against stoke and I hope he is sugar coating because if he's not then he will be gone by Christmas. Better teams will punish us. realistic fans are happy with the result but highlighting the areas we need to improve. And the team didn't win against stoke, magic from our best player won the game.
We will need to significantly improve and press against arsenal if we are to get a result.

Believable11 Unbelievable3

11 Aug 2015 15:21:54
To be fair Arsenal looked just as bad as us. Hope they don't get a decent striker till two weeks

Agree7 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 15:51:25
No, the team did win against Stoke. Coutinho didn't play on his own. It is his job to create and score goals. Just like it is Mignolet's job or Lovern's job to not concede them.

Agree7 Disagree2

11 Aug 2015 15:56:41
Wenger is certainly an upgrade on BR Reet. My hope was all on City to crumble. They showed no mercy against west brom.

Agree3 Disagree3

11 Aug 2015 16:56:11
Harry.
Manchester city's performance will depend on how their defense copes. We all know how stubborn Wenger i just hope he refuses to buy a striker. Though yep he is better than br

Agree1 Disagree1

11 Aug 2015 16:31:49
Big Al, I agree with your sentiment (except the team vs Coutinho bit), it's just a shame you yourself are not one of those realistic fans.

How can you say any performance where we kept a clean sheet and won away was 'awful'. You can say we looked flat or rusty, you can say we were set up badly, you could say that the players struggled to adapt to the system, but awful? That's simply not an accurate descriptive word.

Awful was the 6-1 defeat or our form over the final 9 games of the season. This was a long way from that.

Agree4 Disagree2

11 Aug 2015 17:12:37
Muscat

Apparently we kept 10 clean sheets last season and 8 out of which were terrible performances. We just got lucky by the wonder goals and when you see it all over again, you raise your finger.
If what we saw against stoke is BR planning to do for the season then we are in trouble mate.

Agree3 Disagree2

11 Aug 2015 17:16:45
The defenders did well what they had to do. SKrtel did what he always does. It was pragmatism and the defensive side of the game wasn't too bad, but we were never really tested by Stoke in that area. Attacking performance was poor, that much is very simple to understand.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 17:25:30
Muscat
The performance was woeful. Nothing to add on that. And were is this clean sheet rubbish about. Stoke were way off from putting pressure on the defence. You can mention a clean sheet if it's against an arsenal or man city or a team that creates chances

Agree2 Disagree5

11 Aug 2015 18:18:32
Big al, you say we should be realistic and lambast the people who say it was a good performance then you go and do the same thing just at the other end of the spectrum.

Follow your own advice. Recognise that we can play a lot better but we could also play a lot worse.

Agree2 Disagree1

11 Aug 2015 18:42:11
Top post Al (the first one). It's not just one game, it's a lot of games in the past three years.

Agree1 Disagree1

11 Aug 2015 19:03:51
Muscatred
I believe you have read a different post. Putting your reading glasses on will point you in the right direction chap.
Ofcourse we can improve, we can't get much worse

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 01:12:04
We were aweful until Can came on then we were decent. Stoke did not play well at all hence could not make BR regret his aweful tactics in the beginning. We won I'm happy and we can improve provided BR learns his lesson which based on his game tactics, his idea that we were outstanding and the digraceful way he is freezing out Lucas an Sahko, he has not.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 14:04:25
Lucas for us has been as influential for us as Gerrard mascherano alonso hyypia carragher hamman etc. Perhaps not technically as good as these players. But he gives it his all on the pitch and is a solid player.
Within the current squad he should genuinely be the first name on the team sheet.

He has been a top servant for us. And it's not just him football which is great. His attitude on the pitch towards the opposition and ref is top, he just gets on with it. Brendan Rodgers genuinely doesn't have a clue.

He deserves to be treated with more respect, and I wish him all the best. I do hope he leaves so he can get game time and not be messed about any longer by Liverpool.

Believable9 Unbelievable10

11 Aug 2015 16:07:50
Lucas has Not been as influential as Gerrard mate

Agree12 Disagree2

11 Aug 2015 16:59:57
I think everyone at Liverpool would like Lucas to be in the squad, including Rodgers, but there is fair debate about whether he should be a first 11 or a squad player. Unfortunately for Lucas the guy who makes the decision is in the latter camp.

Lucas hasn't been treated badly, he was given plenty of playing time after the talks last winter. I expect he has been told that he will be 4th or even 5th choice this year and decided that's not enough for him and asked to leave. If that is accurate it is honourable on both sides, I will be sad he's leaving but I'll always consider him a red.

Agree0 Disagree5

11 Aug 2015 16:24:20
Dbol no Lucas has not been as influential as Gerard. My meaning is that he's in that mould, a leader a battler etc. of course the talents are not the same.

Agree3 Disagree6

11 Aug 2015 17:19:38
He should have been given the vice captaincy role at least and I am not a big Lucas fan either.

Agree3 Disagree4

11 Aug 2015 17:39:24
Lucas should be one of the first names on the team sheet, unless we bring in a better holding midfielder.

Red Rum

Agree4 Disagree3

11 Aug 2015 17:55:19
Muscatred, Lucas only stayed because he was told he would play. Apparently what BR meant was I will play when I have to do after we lose several games first. I really don't see how you could not think he's been treated badly- we convinced him to stay when he had a move away lined up, then dropped him like a bad habit when a new, shiny toy came along.

Agree3 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 18:11:40
Rdl, we told him he would play and he did. Now it appears the situation has changed.

Treating him badly would be not selling him and forcing him to sit on the bench.

Agree0 Disagree2

11 Aug 2015 18:42:05
If the situation changed, why wasn't Lucas told he might should look for a new club weeks ago? Instead, he was dropped unceremoniously and, I imagine, quite unexpectedly from his perspective. It's really poor treatment of a player who doesn't deserve, same as happened with Agger and many others under BR. He seems to have real difficulty telling players anything other than platitudes in order to avoid confrontation and instead just winds up making them angry through his inability to communicate or manage (see Sahin, Downing, Carroll, Agger, Reina, etc. who have all largely said the same thing- Rodgers told them one thing to their face then did something entirely different behind the scenes).

I've had managers like that before and I absolutely hated them.

Agree2 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 21:34:27
Lucas to be given the Vice captaincy ?

And what has happened to our former vice captains pretty much since Fowler. Seems to be the sure stamp you are on the way out. I therefore wonder why it's given to Milner.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Aug 2015 01:20:55
Muscat, you are again missing the point. BR begged Lucas to stay and promised him game time because his defence and his DM SG and Joe Allen could not stop a nose bleed. Lucas comes in and we barely concede. Now that he thinks he has no use for him, he trashes him. Whether he is good on the pitch or not is a footballing matter. The issue here us that his treatment goes beyond football. It is now bordering on people's manhood and honour. Lucas has carried himself with dignity, honour and respect, all the things BR lacks based on his dreadful behavior. RDL is right. BR is a coward who can't look players in the eye and tell them the truth so he resorts to these underhanded and high school tactics to make his point. I will never respect a man who can't look me in the eye and tell me what he thinks of me which is why BR has been a failure since he's been here

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 13:50:52
Ed001 Lallana or Teixera for you? I know not exactly same position but would take the same spot in 11 for us

Believable6 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - Teixeira for me, though I do like Lallana, I think it would be best to move him on and get some money back.}

11 Aug 2015 15:59:11
Well that's not happening as BR wouldn't swallow his ego else the world will laugh at his 27 mill spending.
He would sell Markovic for peanuts as he was bought by the TC.

Agree2 Disagree4

11 Aug 2015 16:09:33
There are lots of players I really like at Liverpool because they take being a pro footballer seriously and look like they have some degree of professional pride- lucas, allen,lallana, borini,kolo- but they seem just short of the quality or haven't been given a good run. Shame really

Agree0 Disagree2

11 Aug 2015 16:47:49
Allen? Not given opportunity, I expect BR to hand him a new contract.

Agree3 Disagree2

11 Aug 2015 17:18:49
Allen and Lucas are not good enough for starting 11 in premier, I can see both playing in Europa but if Lucas is not happy as a squad player we have to sell him and buy another DM,

Agree2 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 18:47:10
Even if u think Lucas isn't good enough, he's the best DM we have. So unless we buy Busquets, or Alonso or Really start playing Emre Can in midfield, he should always play.

Agree1 Disagree2

11 Aug 2015 13:32:07
Well done lads on the Stoke win. It was a big pressure game and to be fair we looked solid enough defensively, Stoke is a tough away game for any team.
We created little, I put that down to Milner and Henderson being work horses and not creative enough. Hence why coutinho was drifted further back to get the ball and try make something happen.

Firminho looked very confident and really shows he'll be ready to have a go in this league. So I'm quietly confident with him.

Overall it's a win and a good start, I have no issues at all regarding our attack, it is solid and strong enough to compete with anyone.

The only thing that can hold us back is BR

Believable3 Unbelievable0

11 Aug 2015 14:00:56
Milner and Henderson are never creative. They are box to box midfielders. Countinho ll keep dropping.

Agree3 Disagree11

11 Aug 2015 13:09:57
BBC Sport reporting:

"According to the Daily Star, Spanish newspaper AS claims Barcelona winger Adama Traore has rejected interest from Liverpool, Everton and Stoke to move to Aston Villa.

Reports claim the 19-year-old winger has agreed a three-year deal.

Manager Tim Sherwood is a fan of the player but refused to confirm a move over the weekend."

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Aug 2015 12:41:39
We won! WE WON!! Get some perspective, lads. We won away at one of the most difficult places to travel to - and on opening day too!! I don't understand all this debate and discussion.
Compare the mindset of united fans. I been talking to a few since their opener with Spurs - they're delighted to have got their win - and it could be argued that they played worse than us (they were certainly luckier!). AND they were at home for Gods sake!
3 points is 3 points.
Citehs great performance last night gets them the same amount of points as our dogged, disjointed, hard fought 3 points away to Stoke.
I watched the game with my 7 year old son - and as Coutinho rattled that screamer into the Stoke onion bag we weren't thinking about BR's defensive midfield shortcomings nor his very white teeth nor how much he spent last summer: nope, we danced on top of our red sofa in the living room hugging and roaring our approval. Then we spent the next 4 minutes at our wits-end hoping Stoke wouldn't equalise and oh jeeziz how we loved it!!!!
I'm a Liverpool fan. And we won and I'm
over the moon! I can't wait till Monday night and Bournemouth. Me and the wee man will be on that red sofa again - proudly wearing our red shirts and the both of will be full of hope and expectancy.
At the risk of sounding condescending - for that's not my intention, let's get perspective lads! Enjoy it!! We won on the opening day of the season and we should just savour and enjoy it.

Believable18 Unbelievable0

11 Aug 2015 12:14:00
Hey eds,
Do you reckon Texeira will get any gametime this season? He's not exactly young anymore and needs to be given the opportunity. His assist vs Swindon was class.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - it looks most likely he will go out on loan if anything.}

11 Aug 2015 11:37:40
i can't believe the negative posts about the game , i swear some on here would have been happy if we had played high tempo attacking football but lost

we won ugly and never conceeded get over it

we never played bad ,all the players played within themselves was this down to the manager and his tactics yes its possible ,

we win , we did not play like real madrid or barca but we did not play bad

we had a teenager playing out of position at left back and he played really well , firmino and benteke and milner will get better with games and understanding their team mates , lovren looked good as did mingolet and clyne could be the signing of the season , jordan ibe did not play to his best but it looks good for the link up play between him and clyne , as I've said not one player had a bad game , and fans still moan , look at arsenal they played nice attacking football , but ask them would they rather have 3 points

we will play better and lose so be careful what you ask for , we will also play better and win but not all the time

Believable13 Unbelievable5

11 Aug 2015 12:15:09
We will see how happy every one is come the end of October.

Lets see how the enthusiasm for bad football plays out then when Coutinho can no longer produce a 30 yard stunner vs Chlsea, and Southamptons well drilled defences having already dropped points vs Man Utd and Arsenal

Agree6 Disagree2

11 Aug 2015 12:21:47
being fair though, the team cannot just sit and be happy with the 3 points performing like that. they need abit of pressure to improve, they are at a club looking to challenge, not a club happy to stay up in the league.

the 3 points is a good thing, but for them to continue picking up 3 points, they need to look back at the game, identify areas of improvement.

Agree11 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - now that is exactly it Kaizer. Well said.}

11 Aug 2015 13:24:06
playing badly and winning is an art the likes of chelsea and united have mastered in their way to win titles . let's appreciate we got ourselves the 3 points out of a dull game and with most players being average.
We need hope, come on ; most of us did n't expect anything more than 1 point , we got all 3. let's stop having a downer on everything we do

Agree1 Disagree1

11 Aug 2015 13:30:54
We will improve!
It was first game of the season!
People are so negative it's depressing!

Agree2 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 14:21:22
Never easy to win away to Stoke but a point would have been fair so let's be satisfied with an OK display and the three points. Yes, we will need to improve but all of the top sides will struggle with Stoke, West Ham and Crystal Palace. Take care of Bournemouth next week and we are in a good position for the run of truly tough games.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 14:28:52
No craig it's not negative.
It's not being delusional,posting utter tripe like some have saying
''Gomez was motm'',and it was a ''terrific performance'' ,''Skrtel had a great game'',''Bentake link up play was brilliant all game'' These are all quite frankly delusional statements,I'd rather be negative than delusional. Are we that far off the mark now,that we take 1-0 victories in poor performances as measuring stick for a ''great game''
We have a hard set of fixtures coming up in October and November,we needed to hit the ground running like City did. Instead any one who watched the game properly should already be wary that if the performance doesn't pick up drastically,by the end November we will be out of the title race,there was no improvement on that 1st game than what we got at the end of last year.A better side than a weak Stoke (who won't finish above 10th) would have beaten us yesterday

Agree2 Disagree1

11 Aug 2015 16:11:13
I am worried because we said exact same 12 months ago against Southampton and we were terrible throughout.
It's very difficult for a normal person to trust BR.

Agree1 Disagree3

11 Aug 2015 16:58:46
Equally, last time we won 1-0 against Stoke on the opening day of the season our keeper rescued us with a penalty save. One of our main strikers was out (suspended) and we continued to scrape good results for a few weeks.
Then we played the most entertaining attacking football we've seen for a generation and narrowly missed out on winning the league.

It's all about which example you choose to use.

Agree2 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 17:21:09
Ron

Is Suarez due in October? I have no problem then.

Agree2 Disagree3

11 Aug 2015 17:58:06
Sturridge is due in October

Agree3 Disagree1

11 Aug 2015 19:10:30
Bobatron and EG , like i said in my post we never played bad , we never played open attacking football maybe its because of the last result we had against them i'm just guessing as i don't know how the manager tset up the team or i'm not aware to how the manager told them to play , but where you use chelsea and southampton as examples of how we will get beat by them i will use the other side because there will be teams we will beat and easily beat so your opinion falls down there , it was the 1st game of the season and we got 3 points , so what's important to you really , is it playing well or coming away with 3 points , ask chelsea and man utd fans how many games did they play in where they never played that well but come away with 3 points and where them games the games that won them the prem league ,

like every fan i want us to play nice exciting attacking football and win games by a couple of goals but you will find its not that easy to do in the prem , so instead of looking at the negatives look at the positives , then think we can only improve on our 1st game of the season , that's the way i'm choosing to look at it , i will not concede defeat to any team in the prem like chelsea or southampton like you have bob , we always have good games against chelsea anyway , also with it being the 1st game of the season we can see where we need to improve and work on that so we do improve and just maybe if we get it right we can go on a good run , our fixture list has not been kind but we have to play these teams sometime this season and i prefer to play them away 1st because if we go to their ground and get a result then when we play them at anfield we will know any kind of result for us will give us the upper hand or if we lose we can make amends at anfield , but that's just me as i think we will beat these sides , i won't give up the 3 points that easy

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 20:48:31
Sorry M brock I said we won't have countinho to pull out worldies to rescue us from blushes. we certainly did play poorly in areas and lacked any invention in the attack,that can't even be denied,it's a fact.
We came up with 3 points today but as i said against the big boys we will not. Stop trying to justify 3 points from 1 moment of magic as a standard for a whole season,we play that way for a whole season I guarantee we won't win many games and will be so far off the pace we will be a dot in the distance to our rivals.
I have no idea what you're on about giving up the 3 points that easily? what point are you trying to make it actually makes 0 grammatical sense.
I don't want us to give up any points,but it's going to happen if we don't start playing attacking football.

In all honesty I'd rather play well and win 3 points than play badly and scrape them.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 11:20:28
I've only seen brief highlights on Sky Sports News so have limited information to go on but the general mood on this forum seems to be one of disappointment with the first match of the season. Media reports suggest it was a pretty dull match that neither side really deserved to win. That's exactly the type of match where you look to someone capable of individual brilliance to win it for you, which is what Coutinho did.

So can some of the people who saw the whole match, either on TV or at Stoke, help me out? Were we really lucky? Should Stoke have scored a few goals? Did they repeatedly carve us open and create a load of chances? Based on my limited information my view would be that it's a clean sheet, which isn't a bad start given our defensive problems of the last two seasons. It's an away win. Furthermore, it's an away win against a team that are hard to beat at home and who smashed us last season. Sounds ok so far. I think back to how our season started in 2013/14, when we nearly won the league. A 1-0 win against Stoke, at home on that occasion. An uninspiring performance as I recall, settled by a good strike from Sturridge from the edge of the box and salvaged, perhaps undeservedly, by a late Mignolet penalty save. Two similarly turgid 1-0 wins followed to give us maximum points and no goals conceded after three matches. I would definitely take the same this season. Yes I want the team to play great football. Grinding out unconvincing 1-0 wins isn't sustainable and the shortcomings will get exposed sooner or later if not addressed but it's the first match of the season, after a pretty gentle pre-season fixture list, with five debutants and our number 1 striker still injured so I would have taken any win, with a clean sheet as a bonus.

I wouldn't expect to be making any judgements until at least the first four matches are out of the way, and even then it would be very early days. Bournemouth at Anfield next Monday will give us a better idea of how we're going to set up and play this season. Stoke away is a tough match for anybody, but one would hope that we'll be dictating and setting the tone at home against newly promoted opposition. Arsenal away is another tough one where I wouldn't be unhappy with a draw, and then West Ham at home. Let's see how things look then.

Believable4 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - dull game both teams were awful and the goal was the only really outstanding moment. Stoke did look to play the ball over the top a lot, which saw our defenders exposed a number of times, for pace, but Diouf was simply not good enough so they failed to take advantage. Other than that, they didn't really trouble us, but we didn't really trouble them much either. If it had finished 0-0 it would have probably been more goals than either team deserved. You were lucky you missed it! Plus points were Clyne is a huge improvement over Johnson and Gomez, while clearly lacking experience, which showed at times, is an equally big improvement over Moreno defensively. Impossible to judge Benteke, he got no service other than a few punts up to his head to battle for. First game of the season, so not really a worry on its own, but it follows on from a whole season of dreadful performances, so that becomes a worry. We will be lucky to beat a team playing well like that, but hopefully this is just first game gelling issues and we will improve over the next few weeks.}

11 Aug 2015 11:18:50
I get that we won and getting 3 points is cool. But that doesn't change the fact that we were not so good. If Rogers was in his first or second season, I'd have been over the moon with this result. Unfortunately, that's not the case. He's in his fourth season, and is still making the same mistakes. He changed the game alright, when he brought on Can. But why didn't he start the game to begin with.?What if Stoke scored us before then? Every team needs a DM. It's not rocket science. But we have badly played with one since he came and doesn't look like he's about to.

Believable4 Unbelievable1

11 Aug 2015 12:49:47
You say he makes the same mistakes but fail to mention what those mistakes are. I don't know when so many people become such experts on football management but they come on here and instead of saying it is an opinion they have they make out as if it is a fact that they know better than our manager

Agree3 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - and you never explain your opinion either, so what makes you so special? All you do is say the manager knows best, when that is simply not true, which is why his coaching staff were shown the door and why we struggled all last season. His choices are questionable, as shown by our results, so try explaining why you think the choices he makes are good, instead of just saying they must be right because, even though the performances are shambolic and he is alienating players, he is the manager. Shanks and Paisley got our faith because they earnt it and deserved it, not because they were the manager.}

11 Aug 2015 19:04:23
Red since 64, I stated the problem clearly in that post. If you can't read, don't bother commenting.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 10:46:23
Eds, can this be moved back to banter page 1?

Cheers for the mixed responses guys. I knew I'd be stirring sup some heat with that post and obviously I've got to reply to most.

ED001 - yeah I did forget about Sahin, not surprising though :) and yep, my bad on Moreno but I'd rather it was a loan.

Mighty Reds & Teddy - I'm all about giving players time, that being both game time and time to gel with each other but my focus here is purely on the impact of BRs transfers. not players potential ability or not as may be the case.he's sign a lot of players for good money that he's either dropped, farmed out at a loss or loan or played out of their natural position, so in my mind I would judge them as poor signings.

Essexred - Like above, I'm not saying the players are failures.sure none of them can be failures on the basis that they signed for Liverpool. but did/have/will they work out? In the most part, so far I say no for most of them.
-Fabio Borini
-Joe Allen
-Oussama Assaidi
-Luis Alberto
-Iago Aspas
-Mamadou Sakho
-Kolo Toure
-Aly Cissokho
-Victor Moses
-Alberto Moreno
-Javier Manquillo
-Mario Balotelli
-Rickie Lambert

Muscatred - there's like 22 players there. do you honestly believe they will become players that will either take us back to the top or be of interest to last seasons top for? Don't say Coutinho. I've already said he's done good.

Pommy - that's pretty much my point. even if a player does look like he has potential, BR will make a sh*te of him some how like poor coaching, not playing or playing out of position.

User013 - I don't see what's so laughable about my Coutinho comment, the lads a good player and over the last several years we've not managed to hold on to our good players since. signing a new contract does not mean much if Real/Barca come in with 50+ million

Kizz- yes Emre can fail on the basis that BR either does not play him or plays him out of position. I don't see that as a sucessful signing.it's like if we signed Messi, great player but if we don't play him or play him out of position how is that a successful signing?

Puzzle Red- Coutinho / Sturridge = Success :)

So my point being is that I for 300mil spent, I believe BR has made poor transfers since he's spent a lot of money on players that he either did not play, played or plays out of position and mainly players that I don't think would be of interest to last season top 4.

Believable1 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - Ed033 is currently working on a live newsfeed for the profiles, so you can continue to see replies easily for threads that have fallen off the front page.}

11 Aug 2015 11:29:15
Based on not played/played out of position/who won't cut it I agree with the list.But in that list there is only one player who can help is in getting back to top 4,that player is Sakho.
Also we can add Markovic to the above list.

But as Eds mentioned Rodger's simply doesn't evaluate his transfer targets before signing them.He is like a small kid with money who buys random candies without checking its taste,then throws away the candies which he doesn't like.

Agree2 Disagree1

11 Aug 2015 17:01:40
Do people REALLY believe Rodgers decides how much to spend on a player?
It doesn't work like that, he hasn't spent 300 million, the club has spent that money.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 09:49:46
Does anyone know the fee involved with WBA for Enrique? I hear we're paying £2m but I think they'll ask for more.

Is Digne a possibility to replace him? I read he is available for only £5m. Would we still have funds for him after we've paid WBA?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Aug 2015 10:27:00
It would be a miracle if we convince any club to buy him

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 11:38:48
Now Gomez is playing well, there's no need to buy another left back

Agree3 Disagree1

11 Aug 2015 09:21:37
This isn't moaning, it's just describing my feelings
and even though we won the game I felt/feel so disappointed
I don't want want my/our team just to win (if so, I wouldn't be supporting liverpool for so long)
I want them to play football, to want to play for the shirt and I didn't see that
What do others think?
Thank you all

Believable1 Unbelievable8

11 Aug 2015 10:41:38
I agree with you there Armendn. I simp,y want my team to entertain me and if they win something come the end of the season it's a bonus. A few years back we were the most entertaining team in the league.loss of Suarez, poor signings, poor tactics and a mid table mindset has changed all that.

Agree0 Disagree5

11 Aug 2015 10:55:26
Armendn, It's OK to think we didn't play great on Sunday and to wish for better, as many posters have pointed out we're unlikely to challenge for the top 4, let alone the title, if every game is similar to that, we could just as easily lost as won against Stoke.

But try not to look at games in isolation, over the season we'll have bad games and good games and neither on their own are representative of where we are as a team, give it at least till game 5, preferably longer, to make your judgement.

Rodgers wants Liverpool to play classic, good, quick, short passing football, that's his vision of how to make Liverpool successful. But if that doesn't get results he'll compromise as points are the priority. We saw a bit of that on Sunday with the defence playing much further up the pitch and long balls being played to Benteke.

Hopefully as the team settles and Rodgers fine tunes his tactics we'll be happier with how we play.

Agree2 Disagree1

11 Aug 2015 11:07:09
Very good performance and result. i think you did not watch out last game with stoke.

I still believe its goals and number of goals which will determine our chances, mind that we were able to keep lot of clean sheets last time.


Also none of our strikers received enough service last year. every one is not suarez, but if they are given enough service players like balotelli and lambert can finish.

This year we have bought players who can create and score the likes of ings and firmino, they have played both no 10 and 9 role.

Agree0 Disagree4

{Ed001's Note - how can you accuse people of not watching the game when you call this one a very good performance? Get your head out of your backside please. I am astounded by the deluded few calling it anything other than a good result but the performance needs to improve for the future.}

11 Aug 2015 11:25:44
The only difference between us and stoke was Countinho. Since stoke ain't equipped with Aguero and costa up front we survived. Any decent striker would have scored against us.

Agree2 Disagree1

11 Aug 2015 11:25:55
It is not a real choice between two options. If we play badly we will lose. it is a very competetive league. You can be lucky once or twice and its not that we play a very defensive game. saying this it is always good to start with a win. it should bring some confidence and it will be easier to improve when we have 3 points in the bag. In any case this is exactly how we started last season. played badly and won

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 11:33:34
Really, you got serious there, that was just meant to be a joke. :).

We didn't play well, i think firmino can change it. Can should get into midfield.

Ben,firm,cout can,hendo,milner

Will improve the attack.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - sorry mate, misread it.}

11 Aug 2015 11:35:51
But Musacred, it's not just one game. We've been seeing the same thing for the past 3 years.

Agree0 Disagree1

11 Aug 2015 12:27:06
Jax, that's not really accurate is it. We played badly certainly for parts of last season but certainly not for the last three years.

Also, we clearly played a different style on Sunday to how we've played in any game before under Rodgers so this game should be looked at in isolation, it's unique.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - how was it different? Other than a few minor tactical tweaks it was the same. The main difference was purely that Mignolet hoofed it at Benteke for him to fight for, whenever he got the ball. It is hardly a huge change in emphasis, as the rest of the team were not continually launching it long to him.}

11 Aug 2015 12:29:51
Jesus the time since we were playing well just gets longer and longer it's been a year and a couple months. The last few weeks when we started talking about this season it already became two seasons since we came second and now somehow it's at 3 years? I don't understand the thought process of some posters (although maybe that's the point)

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 17:02:48
Ask Shanks about winning vs entertaining.

Win first, then we'll worry about the performance.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 07:08:11
Not a good performance but good result, I think it should be left at that rather than peps saying we're not good enough and city look title contenders.
ITS 1 GAME! 3pts! Job done!

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - or people saying it was a good performance? Because that is just the same.}

11 Aug 2015 09:53:32
To be honest Stoke are not an easy team to play against, we should be happy with any win against them

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 12:31:43
It wasn't a good performance ed clearly not. But would you not agree that it wasn't a bad performance as in no player was awful just a bit lethargic at times. I think that there was enough there to build on going forward anyway.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - no player was awful, I agree, but no player was playing well either and that should worry us all. I would rather see one or two have an off game but the rest play well. If everyone is a 6 out of 10 every week, then we will struggle badly to win. There is always something to build on, even if it is a disastrous performance, you should be able to learn lessons from it. The problem is that this performance showed no signs of an improvement over last season's performances. So we have good reason to be worried. Though it does need to be put into context that it is a new season, so it can be understood, but the players need to improve next time out.}

11 Aug 2015 14:28:15
Completely agree ed my point was defensively we were better. Stoke weren't great but I doubt many other teams will give up so few chances there. We were also never really under threat. My hope is that the forward fluidity almost takes care of itself as lalanna and Ibe had off games compared to preseason and coutinho was quiet and benteke didn't get a sniff. so if we have somewhat more stability defensively my thought would be we just have to hope coutinho firmino lalanna ibe Benteke etc. Start linking up as they get familiarized and do what they're essentially there to do. providing and scoring goals

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I was worried by the ease that a ball over the top opened us up, I hope that is looked at because we will face better forwards, in terms of ability and form, as the season goes on.}

11 Aug 2015 14:31:18
I would also have to disagree as I'm of the opinion that you're only as strong as your weakest link and last season even when we did play well a couple of individual errors cost us games from one or two players having on off day. I would prefer to see us for the time being anyway hope for consistent 6 or 7/10 and then hope one or two players have a good day to push us over the line as a good start is key and don't think we could afford any 3 or 4/10 performances at the moment! Cheers

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - but we should have consistent 7/10s plus a few 8/10s as well as one or two having a poor game. A consistent 6 out of 10 will lose too many.}

11 Aug 2015 16:02:42
Fair enough ed and yeah in the first half it did look like diouf would have a field day as I think you said somewhere else a better striker would have had chances. I guess I'm just the eternal optimist ha I don't disagree with your points at all most are pretty much coinciding with what I was saying just think you're a little more sceptical than I am which is fair enough. But if you offered that performance and result on Friday I would have taken it no questions asked. Not over the moon with it but I think it had the look of a potential step in the right direction for me! Good talking to you and hearing your opinions as always!

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I would have taken it too, especially after seeing the team sheet and fearing the worst!}

10 Aug 2015 21:31:06
Eds just reading through all the negative banter in regards to Milner and Henderson playing together in midfield! Posters saying they can't play together, with both of them in the team we'l be uninspiring and unimaginative!! How do u see them playing together? Will we be more creative?

Believable3 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - I said before they came in they were too similar and the only way to get it to work for the team is for one or both to sacrifice their game for the team. They will be fine if someone is behind them so they have freedom, otherwise they are wasted.}

11 Aug 2015 05:34:19
Niallo

Can't say it's a negative banter towards them. It's an insight of the game if you watch them play. They are too similar and it's like playing two left back in the same starting eleven.

Agree5 Disagree5

11 Aug 2015 07:50:37
It really isn't about them being the same its about them being too deep, they need a playmaker behind them and be further up the pitch!

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 10:38:02
The only way they should play together is if we are playing a diamond 4-4-2, with another DM, Can/Lucas, playing behind them or in a 4-2-3-1, with Henderson playing B2B, and Milner on the left Wing. Otherwise, It should be one, or the other.

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 10:46:40
OG

Disagree, If they need a playmaker and enforcer behind them. What exactly are they contributing?

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 11:42:48
EG those two statements aren't related. They could have a holding player behind them, allowing the, both to press high and play their best. I don't believe they should both play, unless it's against a top 5 team, but they still have a lot to contribute.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 12:04:50
Fencey

I will give you a situation, BR will field the three men midfiled with Can-Hendo-Milner for the next 5 games and slowly would understand Milner and henderson are pretty much the same and would drop one for sure.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 12:54:32
EG it's about there position on the pitch and running onto balls from the playmaker and not having to dictate the play!

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 02:11:59
Got to say I thought young Gomez didn't get overawed at all against Walters. He's a horrible player! I've watched him torture our more established defenders time after time and I thought he did great. Good on you lad

Believable25 Unbelievable1

11 Aug 2015 00:39:18
Digne to Roma per ESPN
YNWA

Believable1 Unbelievable0

11 Aug 2015 00:03:58
I don't confess to know what makes a great footballer but I have a fair idea what makes a great person and Lucas is in my view a top man.

He has bought great credit on the club with the work he had done outside the club and is a great ambassador. I hope BR does not piss him about and if he now wants to leave ( and who could blame home) they don't stand in his way. My image of the year was him leaping into the crowd after Lambert scored. His face was a picture.

I don't know enough to say if he is a top DM but he didn't look any worse than anybody else and better than some.

Believable30 Unbelievable1

11 Aug 2015 03:59:33
BR has been disgraceful to such a good LFC player and even a better man equipped with hon our, dignity and respect. It's a shame BR has none of those to reciprocate. As a man, BR can only wish to become such a great man of dignity that Lucas is. Whether he should play or not is not the issue. The issue is that he has shown time and again to show disdain, contempt, and disrespect to players like Sahko, Lucas, and Agger and said behavior is disgraceful.

Agree9 Disagree10

11 Aug 2015 03:48:15
ill be sad to see him leave bt he needs to be playing.

Agree6 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 06:47:17
Ohio can't you just praise the player without using it to have another pop at the manager?

Lucas YNWA

Agree11 Disagree11

11 Aug 2015 07:23:50
Well there'd be no point in Redohio posting would there Ron if he did that. I know it's hard for you to accept Ron but Rodgers has more faces than a town clock. He is a fraud of the highest order, a kids coach at best but more akin to a PE teacher. The one saving grace we have is that the squad is now half decent. When he eventually cocks things up again this season, an incoming manager should have no problem in putting things right.

Agree6 Disagree1

11 Aug 2015 07:24:12
Ron Keague. Please do tell why should he not have a pop at the manager, In lucas situation manager is at complete fault, he was the one who made false promises of getting more game time when lucas wanted to leave in January, which he did with so many other better players than what we bought and let them rot on the bench or let them leave the club for peanuts, Ron it's better u accept the fact that rodgers is a good coach but he is a horrible manager with no man management skills, and please don't bring in your same old Cr#p that he is the manager of our team so we should back him up, we are backing our team also him, because we have no alternative to do so, he comes with in the package.

Agree2 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 07:28:51
Im surprised you haven't tried to excuse Rodgers from responsibility in this Ron.

Agree2 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 08:42:54
Ohio,just exactly how has BR disrespected Sakho, Agger and Lucas. Are you implying that it is disrespectful to a player not to play them regularly. I agree with Ron, you take every opportunity to have a pop at BR no matter what post you are replying to

Agree0 Disagree4

11 Aug 2015 09:25:09
Personally I was hoping Lucas was still with us by the time Rogers was replaced. He's too good a player in his position not to be used, and to sell him for some trifling amount makes no sense at all. 'Napoleon complex' anyone? Certainly might explain the idea of players being 'Brendaned' for no logical reason.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 10:37:44
Disagree with Ron and Red since, Rodgers blocked the move for Lucas in January with the view that Lucas would play and to be fair he did. But he played really well and there is no reason why he shouldn't at least be in the 18. This isn't a needless pop at the manager this a real problem. Look at Agger rejecting moves from Barca and City due to loyalty and love for the city and it's fans, not to mention he was class. Agger was the perfect player for Rodgers system and yet he chose Skrtel, it's just mad. I know Carra wasn't happy with the way he was treated by Rodgers towards the end of his career. Lucas should get out while he still can because Rodgers has wasted about 6-8 months of his career through breaking a promise not to mention how he was treated before that. Sakho will be next. We're not having a pop at Rodgers for no reason he is ruining players careers, Ilori is another. I can list more if you want. All I can say is thank you to Lucas for all his service if he goes and I will be delighted if he stays.

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 10:50:00
Red 64

You could call it as either ignorance or Arrogance. We/every team becomes stable and balanced with the right players at the right position. Lucas is the only natural DM we have got with us and there is no excuse tofield a team without someone who knows how to stop an attack.

I am not a big fan of Lucas either.

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 11:23:26
There is a very valid reason why there is a new term used frequently when referring to how many of our players have been treated. That term is of course "Brendaned".

Agree2 Disagree1

11 Aug 2015 15:12:34
I have missed brendaned as a term, the newest one being Lucas,promised to be an integral part of the plans in convincing him to stay and not go in January,only to be dropped.

Same goes for Wisdom,once again signs a new contract based on being given a chance in pre season,as soon as he signs,barely gets a run out in friendlies,and is shipped out on loan to Nowrich.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 17:08:57
i think it's disrespectful to Lucas to turn a positive thread about him as an LFC player and turn it into a negative thread about the manager.
I feel sorry for you all, you are going to have to do some serious back pedalling if we win the league. Perhaps you'd rather we didn't?

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Aug 2015 22:56:29
Tomorrow's papers reporting the Lucas Brendan just up, well done eds. I didn't believe it at first.

Now if Lucas leaves do you see us chasing a replacement or getting by with what we have?

Medel?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

11 Aug 2015 00:52:25
we will buy kroos :)

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 04:00:23
BR doesn't want a DM so as good a DM as Medel is, it ain't going to happen.

Agree2 Disagree0

11 Aug 2015 05:37:14
Kovacic might happen.

Agree0 Disagree6

 
Change Consent