05 Jun 2020 13:56:01
Chelsea apparently has the second best front three after Liverpool
Pulisic werner Ziyech
😁😁😅😁.

1.) 05 Jun 2020
05 Jun 2020 14:29:45
Let’s face it, if we bought Timo Werner. Our front 3 would be Salah Firmino and Mane.

2.) 05 Jun 2020
05 Jun 2020 15:00:13
Exactly why he went to Chelsea 😅😅😅😅.

3.) 05 Jun 2020
05 Jun 2020 16:07:37
But pulisic didn't play that much?

4.) 05 Jun 2020
05 Jun 2020 17:24:20
Let's have it right, Chelsea have spent a lot of money on strikers over the past 10 years or so and not many of them have worked out too well - Torres, Morata, Costa, Shevchenko. However I'm glad in a way that we haven't paid £50m for a player to sit on the bench because that's not fair on him either. Will it come back to bite us - possibly if one of our current front three leaves but I can only assume we've had assurances that they are staying. I also assume that we have other options that may be a better fit with some kind of rotation or who may be happy on the bench initially.

5.) 05 Jun 2020
05 Jun 2020 20:19:18
OP, Chelsea don't have the second best front three in the PL. That belongs to Man City, hands down with of course, LFC having the best front three on the planet, not just the PL.

Now since Pulisic can't get a game to save his arse, how does Chelsea have the second best front three when they actually don't have a front three based on your own standard and team selectio?