17 Aug 2017 08:39:13
Evans to city looks like they understand the vvd situation and moved on.
1.) 17 Aug 2017
17 Aug 2017 08:57:10
My initial thought was they were struggling for the home grown quota and also needed a CB so they thought why not do both.
If they need homegrown players I'll happily sit on the sidelines for 20k a week!
2.) 17 Aug 2017
17 Aug 2017 09:01:15
They don't have much left! They have crossed the limits and are looking to sign Sanchez as well.
3.) 17 Aug 2017
17 Aug 2017 09:10:58
VVD will end up at Chelsea if he moves anywhere.
4.) 17 Aug 2017
17 Aug 2017 09:14:43
In what sense is Evans home grown?
{Ed002's Note - In every sense. Evans is home grown.}
5.) 17 Aug 2017
17 Aug 2017 09:31:41
Mr Dennis are actually Dennis Wise? You seem very keen for VVD to sign for Chelsea 😂.
6.) 17 Aug 2017
17 Aug 2017 10:32:03
City probably want some homegrown players in the squad, hence the Evans interest. let's be honest, he won't start many games just like Delph, Roberts, Sinclair who all wasted precious years at City. Kompany and Stones will still be their first choice CB pairing and when/ if Kompany gets injured, City will do a Liverpool in defending.
7.) 17 Aug 2017
17 Aug 2017 10:54:10
Ings n things, It is just logical that Southampton are very very annoyed with the way that we acted, they now have a centre back who will not play for them and Chelsea are said to be in for VVD (Notwithstanding the social media post stating that he was in London yesterday that was quickly deleted) and if they make a bid that Southampton think is too good to turn down he will go there, we will have zero say in the matter. I personally think because of the way we have acted hell would freeze over before Southampton would consider selling to us, to think otherwise is just self deluding.
8.) 17 Aug 2017
17 Aug 2017 12:39:07
The second poster refers to the home grown quota, Evans is Irish and does not qualify for the home grown quota, being neither English or Welsh.
9.) 17 Aug 2017
17 Aug 2017 13:13:27
Northern Ireland?