27 Jun 2017 10:52:59
Eds, why are we still chasing VVD when there's a chance to sign Koulibaly for a price we can afford? Plus a very good player imo.

{Ed001's Note - because we don't want Koulibaly, we want VVD.}

1.) 27 Jun 2017
27 Jun 2017 11:27:45
There are plenty of options for CB that are as good as VVD or even better for less than VVD. I don't really get it either.

2.) 27 Jun 2017
27 Jun 2017 11:48:09
Still think we could get someone like Nastasic or even Christensen for a fee of around 20 million. Better value for money than either VVD or Koulibaly.

3.) 27 Jun 2017
27 Jun 2017 11:53:02
Regarding the VVD saga, Matt Hughes of The Times writes. " Premier League lawyers have spoken to both clubs and are satisfied that the correct procedures have been followed"

So why the apology from LFC. I'm slightly confused now.

4.) 27 Jun 2017
27 Jun 2017 11:56:42
Its VVD we want guys. No point naming us, we can't have interest in every player. There doesn't seem to be a back up either so its him or stick with what we have.

5.) 27 Jun 2017
27 Jun 2017 12:36:40
We could get Ake?

6.) 27 Jun 2017
27 Jun 2017 15:28:04
Mighty: I don't think this is how it works. As a Club i imagine you have to think about a few points when cosidering a players: a) is he good enough, b) does he fit, c) How much are they asking, d) how much are we willing to pay e) how much can we actually pay and does the money we could spent value his ability. VVD is a good CB no doubt about that but spending €60/ 70mio when there are other decent CB on the market for far less should really be thought through.

Another thing is Mendy from monaco. Sure he is a decent LB but is he worth sendig a) stupid amounts for a LB and b) having to pay his wage as he demands. I think if you look around, like we do on here and we all are far from experts, you can find better solutions considering a good money/ ability ratio.