31 May 2017 07:46:31
I don't understand the negativity on here in regards to possibly getting Clichy on a free.
If we cannot get Sessegnon or Mendy which right now are seemingly unlikely, I would be happy with Clichy on a free.
IMO he's better than Robinson and a lot of the other bang average LB that are being linked.
He also would bring a lot of experience and more importantly, winning experience.
I would rather Sessegnon or Mendy but if not attainable I say take CLichy on the free for 2 years.

1.) 31 May 2017
31 May 2017 08:02:26
Completely agree on this. Clichy is an experienced LB who has won titles. At 31 he still has a few years left and could really offer us a decent option .
City can afford to go and spend £50m on an new LB, we simply cannot. I think Clichy offers a good option in the short term and could really help to develop a younger LB when they come in, shrewd business if you ask me.

2.) 31 May 2017
31 May 2017 08:11:03
Nope! The point is, Clichy is no improvement whatsoever on Milner and would probably command a significant sign on fee and high wages. Money that could be spent far better elsewhere.

3.) 31 May 2017
31 May 2017 08:33:45
I'm confused by this. Part of me thinks it's good to get in an experienced pro who was a good record of winning stuff but another part of me wonders if a 32yo (when season starts) is what we need in the LB position. I'm confused, I suppose if it keeps funds available for other positions.

4.) 31 May 2017
31 May 2017 08:44:23
Doubt he will be on more than Milners reported wages.

5.) 31 May 2017
31 May 2017 09:09:25
Chaps we have zero interest in clichy!

6.) 31 May 2017
31 May 2017 10:52:36
Guys, considering what we have at fullback, i'd even take Sagna.