19 May 2017 02:25:47
If we are to believe James Pearce from the Echo (usually a reliable source for all things Liverpool FC) our main defensive target at CB is Van Dijk. He also stated that Koulibaly from Napoli would be our second choice.
Question to Eds - Who of the two do you rate more? I have seen both play and I would definitely select Koulibaly ahead of Van Dijk.
Would like to know if others share the same opinion.

{Ed001's Note - why is he reliable? He is far from reliable and full of brown stuff.}

1.) 19 May 2017
19 May 2017 04:54:34
Is that to say he is a brownnoser Ed?

{Ed001's Note - no, the brown stuff comes in the form of the articles he writes, which are very rarely worth reading. The Echo has gone downhill at a vast rate of knots since being owned by the Mirror group. No one will reveal anything to a paper that will just tell it all to a tabloid. If Pearce had anything definite worth having about Liverpool, it would go to the main paper, not the Echo. Which means it is pure speculation.}

2.) 19 May 2017
19 May 2017 08:33:03
Got to agree, Pearce is a very unreliable journalist. Although the likes of Tony Barrett and Paul Joyce are both reporting that van Dijk is a target.

3.) 19 May 2017
19 May 2017 14:18:41
That's not what I've been told, quite the reverse in fact.

4.) 19 May 2017
19 May 2017 14:22:14
There is nothing reliable about James Pearce except for being a lap dog for his BFF Brendan Rodgers. Do you really think we are in for players like Khoulibaly, a player who rejected Conte's Chelsea last season? or MacGuire, the slowest and one of the poorest CB's in the PL? Come on, man. You got to be smarter than the article you are reading.